Re: Trap Focus with AF Glass (was: Why wont but MZ-S)

2001-07-19 Thread Jaros³aw Brzeziñski
That's possible but I remember that my words quoted here were in response to a statement that paint had to be scraped off extention tubes to short circuit the contact and thus enable trap focus - if those were third party extension tubes (Kenko, Soligor etc.) than they might have AF contacts b

Re: A 200/4 Macro vs new FA 200/4 Macro

2001-07-19 Thread tom
Sunpak makes one that will fit. http://www.sunpak.com/dx8r.html tv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Not so easy- the Pentax AF140c ring flash accepts a maximum filter size of 58mm; any >size above this will mean the ring flash just cannot be attached to the lens. > I understand the filter size of

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, well, all I have left now is my original MX and a 40/2.8 lens. Not much fat there. If I had to reduce everything including the non-Pentax stuff down to the bone it would be: 2 x MX or LX + winder A 24/2.8 K 28/2 A 50/1.2 A* 85/1.4 A 70-210/4 > Anybody else want to play? People on these lis

Re: MZ-S Frame Overlapping: Not A Problem

2001-07-19 Thread Jaros³aw Brzeziñski
Uneven spacing happens more often in cameras relying on traditional spool and sprocket system to transport the film. Some brands use infrared beam for spacing and this is damn precise but has a disadvantage - you cannot use genuine infrared films in those cameras cause film gets fogged. Thus t

RE: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Erik Nordin
I like to travel very lightweight, and from my current equipment list I would choose the following: MX SMC-M 35/2.8 (or FA 35/2 AL) SMC-M 135/3.5 A better complement to the 35 mm would be something like 85/1.8. I have a Tamron AF SP 90/2.8, which is very good but somewhat big. I am thinking of i

Flashes & questions

2001-07-19 Thread atvars_karro
Hi! I have a list of questions about flashes. 1) daylight fill-flash: can any of Pentax flashes be used for that? See, I'm not a flash guru, maybe this question should be asked a bit differently: will the exposure be correct with any of Pentax flases used, let's say, on ZX-5n? 2) bounced flash: po

Re: MZ-S review in Amateur Photographer (first UK review)

2001-07-19 Thread Jim Moniz
Very well put. Years ago, I had a Nikon F3HPwith the SB12 (?) winder...a damned good camera, yes, but I have had just as good results with my current beasties, the Super Program and P5. I was trying to impress people at the time, in more ways than one, and it got me nowhere but broke. - Orig

Re: Why I won't be using a tripod unless I really need it.

2001-07-19 Thread Jim Moniz
- Original Message - From: petit miam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 6:55 PM Subject: Re: Why I won't be using a tripod unless I really need it. > What? They can actually ban you from using a tripod? > And no-one tries to sue them? That's all

Re: pentax-discuss-digest V1 #980

2001-07-19 Thread Camdir
In a message dated 19/07/01 06:12:59 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << True enough, but another thing that makes a pro camera a pro camera is the ability to rent expensive bits of the system. Even here in little ol' Charlottesville, I can rent, say, a 300/2.8 or 600/4 for my

Sigma 28-300

2001-07-19 Thread Camdir
What would be a good price on this in PAF? GBP199? inc VAT Kind regards Peter - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Re: Flashes & questions

2001-07-19 Thread Jaros³aw Brzeziñski
1) Yes you can use a Pentax flash - and even the RTF - with yout ZX- Pn for daylight fill-in and it will render nicely balanced results. The limiting factor is the synch speed - 1/125 s is sometimes too slow for fill-in since good background exposure would ususally require a faster one. Of cour

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread bc
> If you could but together a basic but complete Pentax outfit--everything you > need but no fat, no extraneous items included--what would it be for you? OK, I'm thinking. 67II with AEII Pentaprism Finder, 75mm F4.5 Shift, 105mm F2.4 Standard, 135mm F4 Macro, 165mm F4 Med Tele with Leaf Sh

Re: K2, SMC-F 100/2.8 Macro AND flower photos (all in one post!)

2001-07-19 Thread Mark Roberts
"Paul Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi Mark, > >Nice shots! > >How do you find the manual focusing on the F100/2.8? i think from memory it >has a quite small focus ring. It does, but I don't have any trouble with it. The quality of that lens is certainly worth putting up with a little incon

Re: Five Photographs

2001-07-19 Thread Mark Roberts
Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Thanks, Mark. I appreciate it. If I'd get myself together, >I'd do a proper update, but where's the sport in that? It takes a lot of work, and if you spend a lot of time at work writing HTML, it's the last thing you want to do when you get home. >Good w

Re: PM's Spotmatic dilemma solved

2001-07-19 Thread Ray Allen
You can still buy the proper 400-series mercury batteries in Australia, Darryn. Be a devil and go buy a battery for it. Ray Allen. Sydney. Australia. Check out Spotmatic at Yahoo!Groups at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spotmatic - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMA

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Frank Theriault
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Mike Johnston wrote: > > > Okay, I've got a question to pose to everybody/anybody, just for fun: > > > > If you could but together a basic but complete Pentax outfit--everything you > > need but no fat, no extraneous items included--what would it be for you? Well, since a

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread John Mustarde
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 21:08:57 -0500, you wrote: >Okay, I've got a question to pose to everybody/anybody, just for fun: > >If you could but together a basic but complete Pentax outfit--everything you >need but no fat, no extraneous items included--what would it be for you? > PZ1p M 20/4 A* 50/1.2 F

Re: PZ1-p & 280T

2001-07-19 Thread Nicholas Wright
You just have to set the flash to TTL mode... it's a great combo. A z1p and 280T was my primary setup for more than a year, never dissapointed me. :) nick --- Jim Apilado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any precautions when using the older 280T > flash with the PZ1-p? > What Mode should I

Re: shooting balloons - which film?

2001-07-19 Thread admin
Amita Guha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, my boyfriend and I are in disagreement over which speed film to use > for this - I say 400 to freeze the action, he says slower to capture > greater detail. We are going to shoot during the day and in the early > morning. >From what I've seen of b

Re: Paper Results

2001-07-19 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Collin Brendemuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: July 19, 2001 7:41 AM Subject: Re: Paper Results > >Ektalure doesn't really come into its own until it has been > >selenium toned to set the blacks. > > Know a good source to read about do

Re: Pros (+ OT)

2001-07-19 Thread Steve Cottrell
>The only camera I own that is a "pro" for sure is a Leica M6, but I >keep its pretension at bay by putting Russian lenses on it :-) Juan! You've got it the wrong way around. It's the Leitz lenses that you should be putting on a Russian body. I wish I could afford an M6. I have a CL coming wit

Re: shooting balloons - which film?

2001-07-19 Thread William Robb
Har. They are still talking about that one at Wal-Mart. L8R Bill - Original Message - From: "Norman Baugher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: July 19, 2001 8:41 AM Subject: Re: shooting balloons - which film? > What film would you suggest Bill for emergency landings in p

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Pål Jensen
MZ-S K 18/3.5 A 24/2.8 FA Limited 43/1.9 FA Limited 77/1.8 FA* 200/4 ED IF Macro Pål - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Re: used equipment in NYC

2001-07-19 Thread Brendan
You get the taxes back when you cross back over but if you mail order or have then ship south you won't get charged for it. Remember at .66 a $100 used lens is $66 usd there. --- herbet brasileiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Plus 15% taxes. You would likely get a refund for > those, but factor t

Re: a screwmount question

2001-07-19 Thread Bill D. Casselberry
J.C. wrote: > tHE ONLY SCREWMOUNT pENTAX MADE WAS THE smc 20 4.5 AND IT SUCKS. Now, there you go again! Bad-mouthing my dog ;^) Bill - Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast

Re: DOF Scale

2001-07-19 Thread Bill D. Casselberry
Dave Stratton wrote: > I shoot a lot of landscapes here in Alaska...and, as others have said, DOF > is a very useful tool. > I try an shoot at f8 - f11 for best performance of the lens...AND I rate the > DOF at least a stop less than I am shooting. Thus, if I shoot at f/11 I > rate the DOF s

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Tom Rittenhouse
Always: 2 Pentax MX bodies with matt grid screens SMC Pentax M 35mm/f2.0 SMC Pentax M 100mm/f2.8 Sekonic L-308 BII meter As needed: 2 Motor Drive M with Nicad Pack M SMC Pentax M* 300mm/f4.0 SMC Pentax M 20mm/f4.0 Tokina ATX 80-200mm/f2.8 2 monopak strobes Tripod This would do for 90% of the pho

Re: Pros

2001-07-19 Thread Mike Johnston
John Edwin M. wrote: > Let's not even get into what's available to the pros > from Nikon's and Canon's Professional Services. Very true. When Canon set out to win over professionals, it was at least as much a bettle between CPS and NPS as it had anything to do with the cameras. A minor additiona

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Mike Johnston wrote: > If you could but together a basic but > complete Pentax outfit--everything you > need but no fat, no extraneous items > included--what would it be for you? That's difficult as the answer would depend on what and where I'd be shooting. But you didn't mention that this wa

Re: Purchase dilemma

2001-07-19 Thread admin
I'm pretty sure that's the way I'm going to go. Perhaps the price of the MZ-S will come down a little in a few months, too. No hope of that happening with the lens. On the other hand, I'm kinda peeved with my local camera shop because when I asked them about the MZ-S they said they had no plans to

RE: Purchase dilemma

2001-07-19 Thread admin
-- Original Message -- > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] asked: >> >> [what to buy] >> My candidates are: >> >> MZ-S (of course) >> 80-200/2.8 zoom (Tokina is the most likely one at this point) >> PZ-1p (a second one) > >If you are buying the body for the AF capabilities, get the MZ-S. >That's the primary re

Re[2]: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, reminds me of a story I once read about 2 of the original Magnum guys, probably Capa and Chim, standing around somewhere each with one Leica round their neck. Another photographer enters the scene, body draped with 5 slrs, flashguns, tripod, bag, you name it. Chim turns to Capa and says 'Just

RE: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread admin
MX SMC-M28/3.5 - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Shel Belinkoff
I agree completely ... I'll never go out shooting with all that gear. Reminds me of a story that took place about two years ago. A group of us from the list got together, and not knowing what gear to take (never having shot with a bunch of Ace Photographers before, and wanting to be prepared for

RE: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Matamoros, Cesar A.
A couple of years ago it would have been my snapshooting package of: LX with Grip B Pentax-A 28-105 f4 Pentax-A 70-210 f4 Now it tends to be: LX with Grip B Pentax-F 28 f2.8 Pentax-A

Re: DOF Scale

2001-07-19 Thread Tom Rittenhouse
Bill is correct, up to a point. Many SLR lenses have scales based on 5x7 prints. For each size larger using the mark for the next larger aperture works well. OTOH, the human eye can perceive a dot (circle of confusion) only so small, a smaller dot is not visible. DOF is based on that size dot. So,

Re: Five Photographs

2001-07-19 Thread Bucky
I like the first and second very much. The colors in #1 are so vibrant that at first glance they appear to have been manipulated. It's only after looking at the background that you see they're just very interesting hues. I am also a sucker for "big sky" shots, being from out Wheatfield's way, wh

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Nicholas Wright
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Mike Johnston wrote: > > > > Okay, I've got a question to pose to > everybody/anybody, just for fun: > > > > If you could but together a basic but complete > Pentax outfit--everything you > > need but no fat, no extraneous items > included--what would it be for you? > > -

Re: newbie

2001-07-19 Thread Scooterman
Hey listers. I'm the latest guy to join your group. A work/study in the college photo-lab/graphic arts (20+yrs ago) gave me the photography "bug"... & I've been a die-hard PENTAX fan since or maybe I just like to cheer for the "under dog". I'm near Detroit, MI, USA I have: a ME-Super w

Re: COLD WEATHER USE

2001-07-19 Thread Dave Stratton
http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Re: Purchase dilemma

2001-07-19 Thread Pentax Clover
Hello please, forget the Tokina. One of my friend told me that it is a 80-200mm f/:3.5 in fact (comparing it with nikon one) There is a Sigma 70-200mm f/:2.8 EX not as well built, but seems to be a best lens formula and cheaper Best is the Pentax one, but too expensive, buying it new... Why not

Favorite Lens Roll Call Results UPDATE 20

2001-07-19 Thread Albano_Garcia
These are the conditions: 1 - You must answer off-list exclusively. On-list votes will not be included. 2 - You must choose Your Favorite Pentax Lens. ONLY ONE. Yes, ONLY ONE. 3 - It must be original, no third-party allowed. 4 - Primes and zooms. 5 - You must specifiy: Tak, Super Tak, SMC Tak, K,

Bodies Roll Call Results UPDATE 104

2001-07-19 Thread Albano_Garcia
Please send the messages to me directly, to not disturb other members,thanks. Also, I've not included 110 and digital cameras, just because I started this way, and I didn't want to change in the middle of the way. Also, if you already submited and want to add new items, please put clearly in your

Favorite Film Roll Call Results UPDATE 17

2001-07-19 Thread Albano_Garcia
These are the conditions: 1 - You must answer off-list, right to me. 2 - You must choose your favorite emulsion (35 and 120/220 allowed. Color and b and w) 3 - You must choose ONLY ONE (color print OR slide OR b and w, etc). 4 - You must have personal experience with it. WINNER by now: Tri-X with

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Todd Stanley
C'mon. You people with 4+ lenses have to be kidding saying that's a no fat kit. Especially when they are 67 lenses... Here would be my no fat whatsoever kit: ZX-M (without grip) A 50mm F1.4 (or A 50mm F2 for about the lightest Pentax SLR combo possible) If I wanted a basic WA/Normal/Tele comb

Re: SMC-A 100/2.8 Macro

2001-07-19 Thread Dan Scott
>Hi, >I wanted to buy SMC-FA 100/2.8 Macro, >but now I saw used SMC-A 100/2.8 Macro >for about 1/4 of price of FA. > >Any thoughts about build quality, optical quality >(sharpness, reflections, ...) of A version (esp. compared to FA) ? > >Thanks for any advice/opinion. >Ivan Hi Ivan I've only us

No Fat--Really light kit

2001-07-19 Thread Christopher Lillja
This is what I'm bringing to Bermuda in Oct. MZ5 Sigma 24/2.8 MF FA 28-80/4 F 50/1.7 F 100/2.8 macro and/or, if space is really limited Jupiter 9 85/2 M42 mount (brand-new "01" production, looks great, waiting on M42/Kmt adapt. Bogen mini pod w/ballhead F Cable release Haze and Cir Polarizer Op

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Mary Jane
Hi, 1. MX + normal (50/f1.4 or 43 Ltd) 2. MZ-S + wide (FA* 24/2.0 or FA 20-35/4.0) + portrait (FA 77 Ltd) 3. 645n + normal + wide 4. polarizers 99% of my needs. See ya Mary Jane > > On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Mike Johnston wrote: > > > > Okay, I've got a question to pose to everybody/anybody, just f

Re[2]: DOF Scale

2001-07-19 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, I don't think this is quite correct. Although it would make the coc smaller than we can resolve, it is not futile because an increasing number of otherwise progressively more out-of-focus points approach the size of the coc and are therefore acceptably sharp, so the depth of field is increase

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Robert Harris
Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > 3 LX with Grip B (serial # above 535) [snipped -- exhaustive listing of lenses and accessories...] > > An Assistant You mean a mule team. : Bob Harris - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow th

RE: No Fat--Really light kit

2001-07-19 Thread Ramesh Kumar_C
Hi I will carry Compulsory items (in Tamrac Nova 4 bag): MZ-5n A 24/2.8 FA 50/2.8 Cokin Square filter holder Neutral Graduated Filter Extra roll of film CPL GrayCard Lens cleaning kit Optional: Tokina 20-35 AF zoom Slik 700Dx tripod (Will always be present in the car) Bye Ramesh - This m

Re: Hello, and a screwmount question

2001-07-19 Thread Frank Theriault
Your are correct, sir! Mea culpa, mea culpa... regards, frank Adrian Sorescu wrote: > Thursday, July 19, 2001, 12:25:14 AM: > > FT> I've seen a few Carl Zeiss Flektogon 2.0 20mm lenses for auction on eBay > FT> of late. They seem to go for over $100 US. > It's 20/2.8 > > -- > adrian sorescu >

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Paul C
Z-1p FA* 24 f/2 M 50 f/1.4 FA 135 f/2.8   This is what I plan to take with me when I hike the West Coast Trail at the end of the month.   -Paul  Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.p

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Frank Theriault
I think the problem with the question as posed, is that it is so open ended and non-specific. My "low fat" group is what I'll take on vacation with me, however when I do go sightseeing or generally taking photos, much of that will be staying in the hotel room/place that I'm staying. On the other

Re: Purchase dilemma

2001-07-19 Thread tom
Pentax Clover wrote: > > MZ-S is not the perfect body I am waiting for, but more like a super > MZ-3n... Yeah, I think you've made your position pretty clear. tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forg

Re: No Fat--Really light kit

2001-07-19 Thread Rfsindg
OK then, really light...For years it was Super Program A-50/1.4 and M-85/2 with film and a lens brush + chaomis plus some baggies (rain hats for the gear). For some reason I threw the M-40/2.8 in the bag too (it was light and doubled-up back to back with the 85mm), but I never used it. Later

Re: A 200/4 Macro vs new FA 200/4 Macro

2001-07-19 Thread Kenneth Waller
You can attach the flash with a step down ring, but I can't say comment about vignetting as I don't have that lens. Ken Waller - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 2:56 AM Subject: A 200/4 Macro vs new FA 200/4 Macro > Not s

Re[2]: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, Here's what David Douglas Duncan used to cover the Korean war:- 2 x Leica IIIc 50mm and 135mm lenses (Nikkor) Backpack: rolls of film, toothbrush, soap, insect repellent, single blanket, extra socks & waterproof poncho Webbing belt: 2 canteens. Wrist compass. Spoon. Sometimes the most impo

Pentax level of price in Japan

2001-07-19 Thread Pentax Clover
Hello can every body go there to read ? http://www.photim.net/nci/discu.php3?code=20010719235750clover You can understand that the 24-90 is quite cheaper than outside of Japan, why ??? See you Thanks for private Mail, to write me to this Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Kenneth Waller
No, he needs a sherpa. Ken Waller - Original Message - From: Robert Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 5:24 PM Subject: Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit > > > Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > > > 3 LX with Grip B (serial # above 535) > >

Jupiter 9 85/2 in M42 (was No Fat--Really light kit)

2001-07-19 Thread Matt Liggett
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 04:59:35PM -0400, Christopher Lillja wrote: > F 100/2.8 macro and/or, if space is really limited Jupiter 9 85/2 > M42 mount (brand-new "01" production, looks great, waiting on > M42/Kmt adapt. As an SP-F user, this intrigues me. Where (in the USA) can one buy brand new Ju

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Bill D. Casselberry
OK - I'll play, too:^) SuperProgram, Winder IIME, K-adapted 85mm f1.9 SuperTak ... and ME Super, Winder IIME, K-adapted 24mm f3.5 SuperTak ... and ProgramPlus w/ SMCK 45-125 f4 zoom with a small shoulderbag to hold the two I'm not usin

Re[2]: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Mike Johnston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > MX > SMC-M28/3.5 Salud! Least fat so far. --Mike Shel wrote: > I took a few bodies, several > lenses, a tripod, and lots of film. I don't think I got a > decent picture all day, but I did get to injure my back, > confuse myself with all the choices, and laugh

Re: DOF Scale

2001-07-19 Thread Bill D. Casselberry
Tom Rittenhouse wrote: > > Bill is correct, up to a point. Many SLR lenses have scales > based on 5x7 prints. For each size larger using the mark for the > next larger aperture works well. OTOH, the human eye can > perceive a dot (circle of confusion) only so small, a smaller > dot is not visible

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Kenneth Waller
This is my (no fat), go with me at all times, Pentax outfit: PZ1P and PZ1 (will eventually start carrying MZ-S in place of PZ1) 20mm SMC Tak28-80mm F70-210mm F200mm A Macro 300mm FA1.4X-SCable release Ken Waller - Original Message - From: Mi

Re: Pentax level of price in Japan

2001-07-19 Thread Pentax Clover
Sorry, wrong link : this one is the good one : http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/product/lense/35mmlist.html - Original Message - From: "Pentax Clover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: vendredi 20 juillet 2001 00:06 Subject: Pentax level of price in Japan > Hello > can eve

Re: Jupiter 9 85/2 in M42 (was No Fat--Really light kit)

2001-07-19 Thread Juan J. Buhler
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Matt Liggett wrote: > As an SP-F user, this intrigues me. Where (in the USA) can one buy > brand new Jupiter 9 85/2s in M42? And how much? There's a guy on ebay selling them, usually with a BIN of $50. His handle in order300. I have bought stuff from him a couple of times

Re: Jupiter 9 85/2 in M42 (was No Fat--Really light kit)

2001-07-19 Thread Todd Stanley
They sell them on eBay now, I think most auctions have a BIN of ~$50. Todd At 05:35 PM 7/19/01 -0500, you wrote: >On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 04:59:35PM -0400, Christopher Lillja wrote: >> F 100/2.8 macro and/or, if space is really limited Jupiter 9 85/2 >> M42 mount (brand-new "01" production, loo

Re: PM's Spotmatic dilemma solved

2001-07-19 Thread darryn . richter
You can still buy the proper 400-series mercury batteries in Australia, Darryn. Be a devil and go buy a battery for it. Ray Allen. Sydney. Australia. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to vis

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread darryn . richter
No! To pick up the lens' which fall out of the Domke bag. I think I'm your man. Unless of course the assistant is for recreational purposes. Pass. Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > 3 LX with Grip B (serial # above 535) [snipped -- exhaustive listing of lenses and accessories...] > > An Assistant

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Michel Adam
- Original Message - From: "Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 7:12 PM Subject: A Harder Game > Okay, now how about this for a slightly different and more difficult game: > > Let's say you suddenly win a grant. It allows you to phot

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Juan J. Buhler
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Mike Johnston wrote: > Which body and two lenses would you choose? LX (because it is sturdier then the MX, one extra stop in the shutter, real MLU) Selecting two lenses is really hard. I cannot go without a 50mm, and then I can only choose between a wide or a tele... M50mm

Re: newbie

2001-07-19 Thread Chris Brogden
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Scooterman wrote: > I'm near Detroit, MI, USA We have a list location survey that's ongoing, but I'll fill you in on the details off-list. > I'm thinking of upgrading, but spending $500-700 on some plastic AF > (Pentax ZX-5N/Nikon n80) piece of junk doesn't sound like a sm

Re: Five Photographs

2001-07-19 Thread Doug Brewer
and you call yourself a photographer... Doug really. thanks. At 6:34 PM -06007/19/01, William Robb wrote, or at least typed: >Nice work Doug. Which three needed the automatic cameras to make >the shot better? >William Robb -- Douglas Forrest Brewer Ashwood Lake Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

Re: Ahem... K55 1.8

2001-07-19 Thread Bob Poe
Juan, I have one of these. I like the perspective, which seems closer to my "normal" vision that the 50mm lenses. Check out the resolution tests which seem to confirm its better than average performance: http://www.takinami.com/yoshihiko/photo/lens_test/pentax_normal.html I think you got a bonif

Re: PM's Spotmatic dilemma solved

2001-07-19 Thread Matt Liggett
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 04:01:19PM -0700, Rofini wrote: > Darryn Richter asks: > >Hence my previous questions to the > >list re exposure guides (I'm still looking > >for an entensive guide). This is the most extensive guide I know of. It is accurate in daylight and at night, indoors and out. I

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Nicholas Wright
No fat ~to me~ implies that you have enough muscle for whatever job that might come your way. I listed, along with others, what would turn out to be something of a heavy bag. When I worked for the paper I often ran into situations when I needed a lens that I did not have, this kit would never have

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread PAUL STENQUIST
I'd photograph the big island of Hawaii: volcanos, rain forest, ocean, desert, wild flowers, and native population. From among the lenses I own, I'd take my Pentax SMC-M 35/2 and my Vivitar Series 1 100/2.5 macro. If I had a Pentax lens that was as good at both distance and macro as the old Vivita

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Bob Poe
OK, this seems more like reality photogrity, (sic.) how about I get a grant to photograph rural and urban ruins with a LX, M35/2 and a K105/2.8. Yeah, I could do that...Bob --- Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, now how about this for a slightly different > and more difficult game

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Stan Halpin
> Mike Johnston proved that it is not only trained monkeys who can use a keyboard, and wrote: > . . . All your film is provided and > all your travel expenses are paid. However, you can only use only one type > of Pentax camera body and two Pentax prime lenses. > > Which body and two lenses w

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Shel Belinkoff
This one's easy: An LX with an M24~35/3.5 and a K85/1.8 I'd shoot in Latin America, and would focus on Peru, Argentina, and Chile. I'd be photographing people in cities and rural areas, mostly the impoverished and oppressed, and those living subsistence lives. I'd work my way down to Tierra d

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Nicholas Wright
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Mike Johnston wrote: > > > Which body and two lenses would you choose? pz1p, without a doubt... lenses would be a tough choice though, prolly end up taking the FA*24/2, and the FA*85/1.4. > > Totally optional: name the subject and/or locales > you'd choose to > > photogr

Re: used equipment in NYC

2001-07-19 Thread Dmitry Gromov
Hi! > Hey NYC PDMLers, could someone please recommend a good store in addition to > B&H to buy used equipment? Any place in the five boroughs or even on the > outskirts would be fine. Thanks in advance! :) Try www.adorama.com I don't know why, but I use them more then B&H lately... Some prices

Re[2]: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread John Edwin Mason
Bob done wrote (re: Bill Allard of beautiful Charlottesville, VA, and National Geographic): [much snipped about Allard's travel kit] >>Not to mention...a fifth of George Dickel bourbon >>whiskey. ...for three weeks in Mississippi. For three weeks!? Barely enough for three days. --John =

Re: Ramblin' Man Keeps Ramblin' On

2001-07-19 Thread Lasse Karlsson
> Which totally clichéd subject really rubs you the wrong way? Glamour type nudes. > Which one do you have a weakness for, despite your > better judgment? This one is difficult. I don't have any better judgement. :( What the hell - nude women! Lasse - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss M

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Lasse Karlsson
This one is easy. > > Which body and two lenses would you choose? MZ-S 77/1.8 50/1.4 > > Totally optional: name the subject and/or locales you'd choose to > > photograph. Nude ladies/the US. Lasse - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.n

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Doug Brewer
The equipment part is easy: MZ-S, FA35/2 and 77/1.8 Limited. The project? I'd photograph the people with the jobs nobody wants. Chicken catchers, septic tank cleaners, roadkill removers, and the folks who really keep this country running smoothly. Doug At 8:12 PM -05007/19/01, Mike Johnston

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread tom
Mike Johnston wrote: > > Which body and two lenses would you choose? > > Totally optional: name the subject and/or locales you'd choose to > photograph. They're pretty closely related aren't they? In fact, you'd probably need to have an idea of the 2nd to answer the 1st. I've been sort of docu

Re: used equipment in NYC

2001-07-19 Thread PAUL STENQUIST
Dmitry Gromov wrote: > > Hi! > > > Hey NYC PDMLers, could someone please recommend a good store in addition > to > > B&H to buy used equipment? Any place in the five boroughs or even on the > > outskirts would be fine. Thanks in advance! :) > >For used gear, Olden's on the south end of Herald

Re: program/super program

2001-07-19 Thread Scooterman
From: "Bill D. Casselberry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit OK - I'll play, too:^) SuperProgram, Winder IIME, K-adapted 85mm f1.9 SuperTak ... and ME Super, Winder IIME, K-adapted 24mm f3.5 SuperTak ... and ProgramP

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Jon Hope
At 09:12 20/07/01, you wrote: I'd find that one pretty easy. An MZ-S, FA 300/2.8, FA 85/1.4. Photographing harness racing. Every race track in Australia and possibly New Zealand would do me fine. Well, you did ask. :-) Cheers >Okay, now how about this for a slightly different and more diffi

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Frank Theriault
Shel Belinkoff wrote: > This one's easy: > > An LX with an M24~35/3.5 and a K85/1.8 Hey, Shel, You cheated. No zooms. Only primes. regards, frank -- "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer - This message is fro

Re: Flower Photography, was Re: Ramblin' Man

2001-07-19 Thread Dan Scott
Mark wrote: > >I think the reason I don't care for flower photography is that most seem to >focus on capturing the bloom. Rarely is there a relationship between objects >or a story of some kind. I'd be much appreciative of a photographer that >took into consideration the meaning of flowers... > >h

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Mike Johnston
Stan wrote: > I would take this combo on the road in Mexico, Guatemala, Ecuador, Peru, and > Bolivia (one month per country plus a month of travel/rest between). > Villages, village markets, beautiful pastel (sunfaded) mismatched paint on > adobe buildings, fancy dress, field workers, campesino w

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread tom
Lasse Karlsson wrote: > > > > Totally optional: name the subject and/or locales you'd choose to > > > photograph. > > Nude ladies/the US. Right, Sweden has such ugly women. Didn't you guys invent porn? tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www

Re: Flower Photography, was Re: Ramblin' Man

2001-07-19 Thread Dan Scott
Rodger wrote: >Now that you mention it... > >Flower photography is damned difficult! I agree! > >My other hobby (my *real* hobby) is gardening. My garden is a very >complex one, and the scenes in it change constantly as different >plants come into and go out of flower. Every so often, just as w

Re: Your "No Fat" Pentax Outfit

2001-07-19 Thread Steve Sharpe
> >Anybody else want to play? > My lightweight Pentax kit is - ZX5N 28-200mm FA zoom 50mm FA macro 17-28mm Vivitar zoom mini tripod Manfrotto monopod I take this when I know I will be carrying it around for awhile, such as when I go hiking. -- Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Frank Theriault wrote: > You cheated. No zooms. Only primes. Whoops! I missed that. Then I'd take a K28/2.0 along with the K85/1.8 ... -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "It matters little how much equipment we use; it matters much that we be masters of all we do use." - Sam Abell

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: July 19, 2001 7:12 PM Subject: A Harder Game > Okay, now how about this for a slightly different and more difficult game: , you can only use only one type > of Pentax camera body and two Pentax

Re: A Harder Game

2001-07-19 Thread Hernan Mouro
You'll have lots of people to take pictures to in Argentina. I just read the news on an on-line newspaper: unemployment is the highest of Argentine history, 16.4%. You'll probably find me there after December, I'll have to charge you for a picture. The K85/1.8 would be enough. Hernan Mouro.

  1   2   >