Mark wrote:
ME The tyranny is not the mirror box
ME per se, but rather the fact that a 35mm box is oversized when
ME compared to the imaging array. I submit that a properly
ME sized mirror box is not tyranny.
You are right, of course, but why bring the optical assembly (lens
included) down
Jeremy wrote:
Can I be relatively confident that *at some point less than 5 years from
now* Pentax will release a Digital SLR that can take all my nice Pentax
lenses?
In a nutshell yes. Pentax is working on a K-mount digital slr. According to
Pentax people, they expect something to be shown
On Fri, 03 May 2002 09:00:15 +0200
Pål Audun Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a nutshell yes. Pentax is working on a K-mount digital slr. According to
Pentax people, they expect something to be shown at Photokina in the fall.
Whos fall, it is fall now here in .au
Kevin
-
This message is
From time to time this lens (FA 80-320) gets regular bashing, and
apparently from the same Sigma proud owners. I'd like to hear from
someone who actually owned both Pentax and Sigma tell us his
impressions. Published tests don't give neither lens a significant
edge at the long end.
Thanks for you comments Maciej
On Thu, 2 May 2002 14:09:08 +0200, Maciej Marchlewski wrote:
Fruits of labor by Jan van Wijk - This could be a very good
photo as it is well composed and the lighting works great but I
find the yellow fruit in the bottom right corner to distracting.
I kind
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The screwmount 300/4s have a tripod collar; the K-mount doesn't.
I sure wish my screw mount 300/4 had one, but it doesn't, and my
Pentax service tech says it's not just missing, either; it was never
there. Different models, maybe? Or did you get it
On Thu, 2 May 2002 13:24:13 -0700 (PDT), Mishka wrote:
I guess, what I would care to know is what are the situations when 1 or
less extra stop makes critical difference.
I can understand fast tele: when you stick 2X converter on 300/2.8, 1
stop initial difference would translate into 2 stops,
Hi PDMLers,
Of those attending the Flying Legends Airshow this July at Duxford
(Cambridge, England, full details at
http://www.macads.co.uk/pdml/
if you don't know already) - the show is held on both a Saturday and a
Sunday. Both days are identical, with the display starting at 2pm and
Hi all,
I just put in my order for a secondhand Pentax digital spot meter which I
just couldn't pass up.
These things are a little over NZ$2,000 new. I paid NZ$600 for mine
secondhand last year.
Earlier this week I found one selling for NZ$275, including a 3-month
warranty (which is just as
erm 4/3 inch? Thats like 30mm by 20mm isnt it? Thats as big, if not
bigger than most DSLR sensors right now.
-Original Message-
From: Pål Audun Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 May 2002 13:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Will Pentax join Olympus?
From Photo
I agree. I tried Vuescan on a Mac and found that it offered no advantage
over the Epson or Agfa software I had been using. But I do the real
correction work in PhotoShop as well. I generally try to get just a
somewhat low contrast baseline scan that includes all the highlight and
shadow detail,
As I mentioned in another post, I didn't like Vuescan last time I tried
it, but perhaps I should have another go at it. Sounds like it has some
genuine advantages.
Paul
Mark Erickson wrote:
Shel,
VueScan has some very nice features that the Minolta software lacks. The
feature that I find
At 21:42 2.5.2002 -0700, Alan Chan wrote:
But the same question remains, Are most 135 SLR users ready to dump all their
expensive lenses just yet? It reminds me what happened to Minolta and Nikon APS SLRs.
Right!
If Pentax will come out with a new lens mount with lenses compatible only
with
I might be missing the point here, but the camera seems reminiscent of a T90,
whilst the lens resembles a Nikkor 600mm - the gold band at the front, the
wide focus ring, but the tripod mount looks wrong. Maybe it's one of those
Sigma 1000mm lenses.
Natch Canon actually made EOS big glass in
Hi Bill, thank you very much. I am from Egypt although, because of my work , I
have been travelling all over the place almost all the time. Right now I am in
the United States.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham
Subject: RE: Will Pentax join Olympus?
Oh, those well known lens manufacturers!
Fuji is a very well regarded lens manufacturer.
William Robb
-Original Message-
From: Pål Audun Jensen
Subject: RE: Will Pentax join Olympus?
JC,
I like the brighter 2nd version, too. Overall depth
is much better to my eye.
Have you tried 35mm yet? I've been hearing mixed
reviews of this scanner, and have considered getting
it.
BTW, the Collins book is top-notch.
Cheers,
Bob
--- J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject:
It's a good thing you nabbed it, James, or I'd have got it this morning. I check for
telephoto metal hoods twice a day for my 200/2.5 (77mm), 300/4.5 (67mm), and 400/5.6
(77mm). Truth be told, I've just acquired one for each, all via EBay. But none is as
long as I'd like. Your 72 with a
From what I understand, the registration length (or what you may call
it) of the new lens would be a lot less than for normal SLR.
Wouldn't a mechanical adapter (sim. to 645 to K and 67 to 645) be the
answer? You'll get to get the best of both worlds: inexpensive
equivalent of 600/4 and very
Hi PDML folk:
I've got a Velbon 540CX Tripod up for sale with an extra QR plate.
The 540CX has a 3 way pan head with auto lock quick release (QR)and measures 24 inches
folded and 59.8 inches fully extended. It also has a built in spirit level.
The tripod's 9 months old, in good condition and
Alin Flaider wrote: I don't see why this specie has to be smaller then current 24x36
systems, unless smaller area chip can support 16 MPixels.
Well, I remind you what someone pointed out this week: With a typical small CCD, f/2.8
yields the same depth of field as a 35mm camera's f/11. That's
Thank you very much Paul. I am certainly interested in being associated with
your group and joining you whenever I am in Washington ( my job entails a lot of
overseas travel). I am sure I can benefit from your knowledge about the older
Pentax I am using. As I mentioned, I have not used it for the
From The Writer's Almanac, by MPR:
It's the birthday of journalist and reformer Jacob Riis, born in Ribe,
Denmark (1849). He came to America looking for work as a carpenter,
then started working as a reporter. Within a few years, he bought the
struggling South Brooklyn News and transformed it
it's alright. but not much better than Nikon F100 though, if you don't
care about weight.
vbg
From: wayne willis \(aka pinkys right hand man\)
Subject: how good
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 04:14:44 -0700
mz-s is it any good?
i have a pz-1
Check this out.
http://www.markcassino.com/index.htm
On Friday 03 May 2002 08:03 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, I intend to dabble a bit in nature microphotography and
would appreciate any advice on technic or gear.
--
Kenneth Archer, San Antonio, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This
I might be missing the point here, but the camera seems
reminiscent of a T90, whilst the lens resembles a Nikkor 600mm -
the gold band at the front, the wide focus ring, but the tripod
mount looks wrong.
Aw, Peter, you can even read the PENTAX label painted on the
extended lens hood in the
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 01:53 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I agree. I tried Vuescan on a Mac and found that it offered no advantage
over the Epson or Agfa software I had been using. But I do the real
correction work in PhotoShop as well. I generally try to get just a
somewhat low contrast
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 03:49 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
As for the cost in weight and size, well, again, if you need the speed,
then you put up with the size and weight. However, many - not all,
maybe not even most - people who use fast glass also have slower,
smaller, lighter lenses
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 02:33 PM, Cotty wrote:
LOL! Can I just send the derned thing to you, you load it, send it
back??
Sure. Please be sure to include some form of bribery in the package.
Cookies are effective.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
I paid $750 US for a 75mm f2.8 for the 67, when I could easily find a
75mm f4 for half that.
So it's worth at least double to me. ;)
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
Well, not necessarily. DOF also depends on COC (circle of
confusion), which is inverse proportional to resolution. Hence,
together with future higher resolution, we will see today's
amazing DOF dropping towards... 35mm standards.
It amazes me how many see film and digital as comparable
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Welcome aboard, Mohamed. The list has four active members
in greater Washington, DC: Tom VanVeen (I know I spelled
that wrong; sorry);
That's ok, I'll probably mispronounce yours.
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 12:56 PM, Evan Hanson wrote:
Aaron you're a genius the words I was looking for but couldn't
find are my base isn't clear enough. What causes that?
Overdevelopment of some kind. How is your agitation? Are you
aggressive at all? Are you precise with dilution
In a message dated 03/05/02 14:50:16 GMT Daylight Time, Kevin writes:
What is the IF for on a lens?
eg 1:28 135mm IF
IF only..it were less expensive.
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 08:06 AM, David Brooks wrote:
Hi all.I am going to assume that one pre mixes
his or her chemicals for home developing prior
to starting the proccess.
My ??? to those is,whaat do you use as far as
chemical holders and what is a good way to get
the chemicals,rinse
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Brooks
Hi all.I am going to assume that one pre mixes
his or her chemicals for home developing prior
to starting the proccess.
My ??? to those is,whaat do you use as far as
chemical holders
I might be missing the point here, but the camera seems
reminiscent of a T90, whilst the lens resembles a Nikkor 600mm -
the gold band at the front, the wide focus ring, but the tripod
mount looks wrong.
Aw, Peter, you can even read the PENTAX label painted on the
extended lens hood in
In a message dated 03/05/02 14:50:16 GMT Daylight Time, Lukasz writes:
Weren't all T90 black?
Not all. Some were made for the Japanese miltary in white.
Is't that camera black then? My eyesight must be going
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Actually, that's what, in my view, is good for: get as much accurate
data from your CCD as you can, for further tweaking in Photoshop. I am
not aware of any other tool that allows you to store 4 channels (IR
included) of raw CCD data
Its color correction tools have a lot to desired (although for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeremy Clegg
Hello All
I have been absent from the list for about a year, but have
been drawn back
since I have been taking a photography class at university.
Anyways, I dont have a *lot* of
In a message dated 03/05/02 14:50:16 GMT Daylight Time, Paul writes:
The Pentax MH-RA67 hood arrived yesterday. I must say, it looks stunning
on my Rikenon APO 300/4.5. I paid $40 BIN, and I feel that half of that can
be justified on aesthetics alone.
You bought an 85 hood for a 300? Did
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mishka
Tom, you said, you'd pay 3 times more for a 75mm normal
lens, but you
didn't say why.
Um...because from my perspective the biggest drawback to medFo is
speed. The lenses are slower...pretty
In a message dated 03/05/02 14:50:16 GMT Daylight Time, Fred writes:
Aw, Peter, you can even read the PENTAX label painted on the
extended lens hood in the photo - unless part of the camouflage
involved making some Nikon lens look like a Pentax A* 600/5.6 - g.
Then my eyesight definitely
On 3 May 2002 at 9:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I remind you what someone pointed out this week: With a typical small CCD,
f/2.8 yields the same depth of field as a 35mm camera's f/11. That's why the
pictures taken by my friends' digicams often put mine to shame.
And your paper thin
From: Jan van Wijk
I kind of like it myself, it adds another color to the whole palette
of slightly different raspberries ...
All in all it's your photo. But if I had a chance to re-shot this subject I
would either eliminate this yellow raspberry or move it closer to one of
strong points. I
Having just bought a winder LX, I have a question. Does anyone else find
it extremely loud, or do I possibly have a bad one. The winder itself (the
gearing and motor) sound loud. I would imagine whatever I am shooting
would get startled after the first shot and bolt.
My answers interspersed below.
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Overdevelopment of some kind. How is your agitation? Are you
aggressive at all? Are you precise with dilution and temperature? If
you're already pretty relaxed when agitating, and your temperature is
bang on, I'd suggest shaving 10%
On 3 May 2002 at 20:59, wayne willis (aka pinkys righ wrote:
mz-s is it any good?
Hi Wayne,
Yes it's good.
is the 24-90mm lens of pentax any good?
Yes it's good.
For more informative answers you might tell us what you do or want to do with
your cameras and what lenses you have experience
On the Rollei list this morning:
Pentax 40mm f/2.8 Pancake lens. $175 (quite a bargain-check KEH or
*bay)(makes a M body Pentax pocketable)
Please don't contact me. Contact Mike Stoesz: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
Mine is pretty loud too. I'm getting used to everything for or on the LX as
being loud. Definitely not a stealth camera! ;-)
Wouldn't give it up though!
Christian
On Friday 03 May 2002 10:32, Jeff Post wrote:
Having just bought a winder LX, I have a question. Does anyone else find
it
On 3 May 2002 at 6:01, Mishka wrote:
From what I understand, the registration length (or what you may call
it) of the new lens would be a lot less than for normal SLR.
Wouldn't a mechanical adapter (sim. to 645 to K and 67 to 645) be the
answer? You'll get to get the best of both worlds:
David wrote:
Hi all.I am going to assume that one pre mixes
his or her chemicals for home developing prior
to starting the proccess.
Yes - you mix up the bagful of chems first. I use
those plastic gallon or 1/2 gallon fruit juice jugs
and keep'em in a dark
I don't want to over react, but nothing could be further from the
truth. One of my first jobs was with R.W.Schott Photographic
Specialists, Denver, CO. Kokak tech reps often brought other
photographers to tour our lab to see how it was supposed to be done.
We had all the temp control
For all those interested in film scanners, I highly recommend looking
at
http://www.mail-archive.com/filmscanners%40halftone.co.uk/
That's by the way one of the places where Ed Hamrick shows himself frequently.
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com
-
This
If you have enough DOF, bokeh is not an issue. Grin
When you say an order of magnitude, do you mean that you can enlarge 35mm
ten times larger than a digital image?
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Alin Flaider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:47 AM
To: [EMAIL
Rob,
By the same token, because one has spent tons of cash for 55mm 67 lens,
there's no reason to make 35mm cameras where 50/2 often comes for free
;)
Besides, the 35mm equivalent of 67 55mm lens is what, roughly 24mm?
There are tons of those available for fraction of what one has to spend
for a
I see you've received some replies already.
I prefer to use dark brown glass bottles for my stock solution of
developer, but, until I get more, I've been using the dark brown plastic
photo jugs that you can buy in any decent photo shop. HOWEVER - BIG
CAVEAT HERE: Do not use jugs made by Kalt,
Hi Ken ...
I've wondered about that recently. I used to work very hard to maintain
constant temperature across the entire process, but a couple of years
ago, in an Ilford or Kodak instruction sheet, or in one of kodak's photo
guides, it was clearly stated that as long as the stop, fix, and
Think of Olympus position this way. Canon and Nikon
are stuck with their 24x36 platforms because of their
huge user base while Olympus has been phasing out for
years. Olympus does a little research and finds that
it is difficult to produce 24x36 CCD or CMOS sensors
even given significant
Shel, on temp consistency, wrote:
The problem as I understood it was reticulation, not grain clumping per
se. Try as I might, I can't get reticulation at all these days.
I also got that impression from the posting. It seemed as if
it was of a long past time. I have only
Leonard wrote:
PL If you have enough DOF, bokeh is not an issue. Grin
Right. No DOF for me, please.
PL When you say an order of magnitude, do you mean that you can enlarge 35mm
PL ten times larger than a digital image?
No. It was just a figure of style. At its best, 35mm film can be
Kodak made some world class lenses over the years and I'm sure they have ample
resourses to do so again.
I have a 100mm luminized (single coated) Ektar on my 3x4 Speed Graphic and it's a
truly fabulous lens.
Oh, those well known lens manufacturers!
As far as I can see, this is currently a
Which brings me to the question, does anyone know, what may be the
reason for not making leaf shutter lenses for 35mm SLRs, like they have
for P-6x7 (and almost everything 6x6)? That would bring sync speed to
the *really* nice 1/1000!
From: Ron Bhanukitsiri
Subject: RE: how good
Date: Fri,
Freed wrote:
It would look a lot nicer to us Pentaxers (many of whom are your customers, I would
like to subtly point out - ) to see the Home page links
read as Nikon and Pentax, rather than Nikon and Other Brands
(of which you have only Pentax, anyway, at the moment, right?).
Fred,
I love
Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You bought an 85 hood for a 300? Did you get the soft case with the hood?
Yes, Peter, the hood is brand new. It was one of three new ones for sale on US EBay
last week, all from different sellers I bought one, the other went for I guess around
$27, the
Ron,
I've got to reply to this. Bear in mind that for quite awhile I owned
and heavily used 2 PZ-1p's and like them very much. I now own 2
MZ-S's.
See my comments below
Bruce
Friday, May 03, 2002, 9:08:16 AM, you wrote:
RB I'm in the same boat ;-). Although I haven't seen the MZ-S yet,
Fred.
The site is due for a tart-up soon - I know.
Unfortunately I will have to stop reading the digests in order to make time
to do this. :(
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 12:11 PM, tom wrote:
One flip is about 1 or 1.5 seconds of agitation, amounting to 2 or 3
secs of agitation per minute. I've never seen a recommendation for
less than 5 secs of agitation per minute unless you're doing something
weird like stand developing.
Sure
Well, I guess Americans interested in the leather hood case would do better to write
to the aforementioned EBay seller, who couldn't unload the case and hood for $20.
But you blokes in the Old World...
PS: As soon as I posted my offer to sell the hood case to N. America and Europe, I saw
a
I don't recommend a pre soak. It has, for me, upset the development
time and i could never get consistent results. It has been said that
when the film has received a pre soak, uptake of developer may not be
consistent.
I'd like to get some comments regarding consistent, or inconsistent,
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Post
Subject: Pentax Winder LX
Having just bought a winder LX, I have a question. Does
anyone else find
it extremely loud, or do I possibly have a bad one. The
winder itself (the
gearing and motor) sound loud. I would imagine whatever I am
shooting
In local.pentax, you wrote:
Which brings me to the question, does anyone know, what may be the
reason for not making leaf shutter lenses for 35mm SLRs, like they have
for P-6x7 (and almost everything 6x6)? That would bring sync speed to
the *really* nice 1/1000!
Maybe because of their
I never heard of that one before, now I have several things to
try this weekend. Just like I tell my kids you learn something
new everyday.
Evan
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Sure you have, you just saw me recommend it! ;)
Pre-soak is a good tip that I forgot to throw in. Evan, definitely
I can only guess. So here goes:
I haven't seen any leaf shutter lenses in the range of f/1.2 or f/1.4.
Could be design difficulties, perhaps?
There'd still have to be a sort of focal plane shutter and mirror
arrangement, like the hasselblad, because you'd have to have at least one
shutter
Having just bought a winder LX, I have a question. Does anyone else
find it extremely loud, or do I possibly have a bad one. The winder
itself (the gearing and motor) sound loud. I would imagine whatever
I am shooting would get startled after the first shot and bolt.
Jeff -
With LX +
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:26 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't recommend a pre soak. It has, for me, upset the development
time and i could never get consistent results. It has been said that
when the film has received a pre soak, uptake of developer may not be
consistent.
I have
Rollei does 1/1000:
http://www.rollei.de/cct/files/rollei/data/DB_System6000_d.pdf
There're lots of cheap 35mm cameras (e.g. all ps) that have LS lenses,
so it can't be *that* difficult.
From: Johan Schoone
Subject: Re: leaf shutter for 35mm? (was RE: how good)
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002
03 May 02 Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which brings me to the question, does anyone know, what may be the
reason for not making leaf shutter lenses for 35mm SLRs, like they have
for P-6x7 (and almost everything 6x6)? That would bring sync speed to
the *really* nice 1/1000!
Mishka,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
I don't recommend a pre soak. It has, for me, upset the development
time and i could never get consistent results. It has been
said that
when the film has received a pre soak,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron Reynolds
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 12:11 PM, tom wrote:
One flip is about 1 or 1.5 seconds of agitation,
amounting to 2 or 3
secs of agitation per minute. I've never seen a recommendation
Hi,
continuing the off-topic search for the Portland Hotel which may be of
interest to some people other than me and Lasse, today I had a look
in the London telephone directory for 1920. In fact, there are 2
directories for that year, issued in April and October, which I
suppose reflects the
Thanks for the info Bill.Looks like a trip to
Home Depot/Henrys/Aarons for trays etc.
BTW i had some proofs done of the IR roll
taken last month.I think 2-3 are worthy of a
scan and insertion on my site.The ones of the
tree/wire look very eerie Aaron.
dave
Begin Original Message
Thanks Aaron,Shel,Tom.I think colour is quite a
ways off so i can cancel the trip to the fish
store:)I remember the heating of water being
brought up,did not realize that the colour end
was more crtical.
I thought that might be the best way,put a tray
of water out during the day and let it
Bruce, thanks.
Considering that the Epson 2450 is a flatbed and around the same
price (thus more versatile), I wonder how much I'd give up by getting
the Epson over a dedicated film scanner? I need a flatbed for other
stuff as well.
I'm putting a moratorium on purchasing of photo equipment
Thanks for the film scanner info. I know I get what I pay for, just
want to see if getting the dedicated film scanner for under $400 is
worth it or just to get the Epson 2450 flatbed, like JCO just did.
I'll be scanning print film color negatives, so probably easier than
BW.
Taka
-
This message
Because it generally captures *all* of the information on the film without
clipping highlights or shadows, and does so with a minimum amount of
adjustment. Many (including myself) prefer to adjust highlights, shadows,
contrast etc. using Photoshop or a similar graphics program where the image
You can get 1/1000 from the shutter of the old Super Graphic and 1/750 from the
shutter on a
Fuji GA645.
--
Collin Brendemuehl, KC8TKA
---
Get over it.
Dr. Laura
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Thank you Bruce for the info you've supplied. First of all, I
suggest that we refrain from making remarks about the poster and
concentrate on the facts. This will be more helpful to the
originator of this thread in helping him/her decide.
I'm not writing a review of the MZ-S which is why
For those saying it's difficult:
Olympus Stylus Epic, street price $100 for the whole camera, 35mm/2.8
lens, shutter 4-1/1000s.
As far as OPC, Pentax is making it for 645 and 67. Seems like a logical
step to make one or too for 35mm as well. SMC-FA 85mm/2 LS -- wouldn't
THAT be sweet?
Yahoo!
Johan Schoone wrote:
I haven't seen leaf shutters that can do 1/1000.
It's rare, but it's there:
A few of the AF point-and-shoot compacts, such as the Olympus Stylus Epic, can do
1/1000 second.
Back in the 1980s, the Olympus XA-4 could do 1/750 second.
The Vivitar 35 EM, a late 70s or
Pre-ebay offer to the list asking $75 + $10 Insured Priority Mail in US.
Great fast manual focus lens. This particular lens seems to be extremely
sharp, it was very hard to decide whether to sell it or my 1.4 which is not
quite as fantastic as this 1.7. It is about ex++. Original Pentax caps.
Pre-ebay offer to the list asking $200 + $10 Insured Priority Mail in US.
This is the one that everybody says is so very good. It is about ex+.
Respond to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
Pre-ebay offer to the list asking $40 + $10 Insured Priority Mail in US.
This is the lens I used for a lot of my static aircraft photos. It is very
sharp and has little distortion. In box with all papers, including blank
warrenty card. It is about ex+.
Respond to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ciao,
Pre-ebay offer to the list asking $100 + $10 Insured Priority Mail in US.
A great mid-tele manual focus lens. Works in program mode with the AF
Pentaxs It is about ex+.
Respond to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ron Bhanukitsiri
Last but not least, can you tell us which features of the
MZ-S got your
sold? Remember, some features that you like may be
unimportant to others.
I certainly like the height of
I'm going on vacation with the family for a week so I'll be off-list for a
week as of tomorrow. (would you have noticed?)
Anyone in the Carolinas have a good place to get Tri-X processed in Myrtle
Beach? I'll have lots of family members who'll want to see what I've been
shooting all week ;)
They do not have leaf shutters. The Leica has a horizontal running
cloth focal plane shutter.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Schoone wrote:
I haven't seen leaf shutters that can do 1/1000.
The Leica M rangefinders have long been able to
reach 1/1000 second. So could the Leica CL and
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 03:12 PM, tom wrote:
Yeah, but you use a Jobo and agitate constantly!
I do now, and I also recognize that many developers are worthless in the
Jobo for precisely that reason. I love Rodinal in hand tanks. I hate
Rodinal in the Jobo.
-Aaron
-
This message is
This is from James Adams, whose messages to PDML don't seem to be getting through:
Can anyone tell me what batteries I need for the Program Plus. The Ebay
seller forgot to re-fit the batteries before shipping it. The Prog. Plus is
supposed to be arriving by UPS today. James
My experience is that I was unable to get consistent results. I'd soak
the film for X minutes, develop, and get a result. If it were
satisfactory, I'd try it again, but the results would be different. It
just didn't work for me. Maybe I didn't find the magic combination of
pre soak time and
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
