From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:45:13 -0500
According to Pentax, it's to prevent bonehead consumers (they didn't
actually use the word bonehead but that's my poetic license!) from
accidentally moving the lens off the A setting and taking all their
photos at f/22,
On March 13, 2003 06:22 pm, Keith Whaley wrote:
Is she even _capable_ of speaking in either American or the King's English?
I missed the news. When did she die?
Nick
(wrt GFM) My plan is to be there and add some color to the canvas.
Perhaps this is the year that PDML sweeps the contest categories...
wudduya say, Bubba?
- ambitious jerome
On 03.3.14 7:25 AM, Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not jpeg artifacts. That's just dust on the sensor.
Where did you get this strange info from?
Ken
On 10 Mar 2003 at 7:48, Chris Stoddart wrote:
Last month I ordered two filters (big circ polarizers are 1/2 the UK
price in the USA!) from New Jersey, and they were shipped USPS airmail on
the same day. One turned up in 5 days whilst the other turned turned up
last Saturday, exactly a month
Hi all,
I have virtually never used a motor or a winder, so I am relatively
ignorant in this area. I received a question from a KMP reader, if the
Winder ME (not the ME II) works properly with the programPlus.
On the Winders KMP page I say that the ME and ME II winders work with
all A bodies.
You were correct, the lens arrived yesterday,
Great. I guess you're a bit relieved now.
Regards,
Lukasz
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Gary - just don't show those pictures :)
For the record, outside of the dust and water spots, they're really not
that bad. :)
I was going to write that we had a naked orgy in the Egyptian tomb and go
thrown out of the
museum but decided someone might
Hi
About masking some contacts I have read. I know that Alan did so with his M135/2.8.
Cheers
Alek
Uytkownik Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Dear All,
I own M35/2.8 but think about buying A version to have spot/matrix
on my PZ1 and more flexibility on Super A. Could you write any
Hi,
But if I use it mostly for landscapes and shoot from f=4 the results should be great I
hope. So even at 2.8 is not so good but probably better than 2.8 version full open.
Thank you!
Alek
PS Is it similar to FA version if performance is concerns?FA lens got great reviews...
Uytkownik
Do you have/had any other 35mm from Pentax?
Indeed, K35/3.5 is said to be very nice but ... contacts would be nice to have.
Alek
Uytkownik Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
I was not satisfied with my A35 f2.8 - just never seemed to be sharp. I
replaced it was a K35 f3.5, and that lens
I wonder what enlargements you have done to compare your 35mm.
K35/3.5 would be nice but a little too dark and no A but I do not exclude it-some
people believe it is great performer and not so expensive
Alek
Uytkownik Peter Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
I\'ve played with the K 35 f3.5 I
Thank you William!
Alek
So maybe A35/2.0 would be nice for me. I must look at the prices of it. If it is
really pricy, maybe it is better to buy FA version...
Alek
Uytkownik William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
- Original Message -
From: Peter Alling
Subject: Re: Re: A35/2.8 lens
Sounds like a good idea to me. I plan on taking the Jobo processor so we
can have more than one roll to pick our entries for. I'll have enough
Tetenal chemicals to process 6 rolls
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Nick Zentena wrote:
Which may be the problem. ND filters if you can't cut the light
any other way? You may solve all your problems by going back to the
1:9 and cutting the exposure down some how.
One of the things I'd like to get a feel for is basic and simple
So You did not like A35/2.0. Why?
What about optics?
Alek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Despite the fact that they are
significantly less common than the M lenses, the A35mm F2 handles like a
dream. Mind you, I haven\\\'t shot it.
Oops. Small typo. Should have read the A 35mm F2.8 handles
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Butch Black wrote:
I'm not familiar with Sprint chemistry but 30-45 seconds sounds too short
for a developing time even with RC paper and a 15W lamp bounced off the
ceiling sounds like it's way too weak of a light source. I would normally be
Believe it or not, its pretty
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
You did too much in even metioning the movie. I thought you were cool like
that! Now you are making me have to take a trip to PA! :-) Oops, now
if you don't show up on the list people will look to me :-0
You'll have to have the same person
I wrote:
---
Dear Sirs,
I'm feeling very excited about the *ist, but since I have a lot of K-mount
equipment (lenses, extension tubes...) I would like to know if the *ist can
use my K-mount lenses and accessories without problems ? (Does aperture
coupling and metering works?). I have a MZ-5n
Roland Mabo said:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:45:13 -0500
According to Pentax, it's to prevent bonehead consumers (they didn't
actually use the word bonehead but that's my poetic license!) from
accidentally moving the lens off the A setting and taking
I have tried both winders on a P50. ME didn't work, ME-II did.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Bojidar Dimitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 1:58 PM
Subject: Winder ME and A-series bodies
Hi all,
I have virtually never used a motor or a
Well, a little power-point presentation (or Freelance graphics) running on
the LCD-panel at the back would probably do the trick. :-)
Best wishes,
Roland
From: Gregory L. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:19:49 -0500 (EST)
You think they'd read the user manuals?
Perhaps the
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Don't change the developer mix or the development time. Change the
exposure time.
I'm hoping that a contrast filter should also help me out by cutting back
some of the light reacing the paper, too.
Unfiltered MG paper is somewhere around 0 or -1.
When I asked for clarification, they wrote:
---
Well I believe the A series lenses should work too, but I do not
Have enough information to confirm it.
---
So, no word on K-mount then... Only KA, KAF and KAF2.
Best wishes,
Roland
Too bad. Time for the Pentax mantra: The flagship is coming, The
flagship is coming, The flagship is coming, The flagship is coming...
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Roland,
The *Ist SLR can take all auto focus Pentax lenses.
it's a K lens and I'm sticking to that...
Vic
In a message dated 3/14/03 7:34:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
200mm f2.5 m (it's not a K lens, and I am sticking to that)
Gee, Peter, did it actually say Pentax-M on the barrel ???
Fred
I might even consider the American model if it yelled out, Hey,
Stoopid! With custom functions for loud and louder. Lend it to in-laws
so they can take good pictures at music recitals.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps the camera should give a verbal warning when the ring is moved
from the
So You did not like A35/2.0. Why?
What about optics?
Alek
Hello Alek. It was an ugly graded lens. Quite horrible. Plenty of paint wear,
dings, dents, scuff, you name it. Of course I never shot it. The previous
owner was an LX wielding pj who travelled the world moved to Nikon AF for
On March 14, 2003 08:56 am, gfen wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Nick Zentena wrote:
Which may be the problem. ND filters if you can't cut the light
any other way? You may solve all your problems by going back to the
1:9 and cutting the exposure down some how.
One of the things I'd like
200mm f2.5 m (it's not a K lens, and I am sticking to that)
Gee, Peter, did it actually say Pentax-M on the barrel ???
Fred
Fred. As it was puchased new in ?1983? and sold in 1986 (moved to Canon FD
system) I can barely remember. Fairly sure 'K' was not marked, though. Even
though
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
But if I use it mostly for landscapes and shoot from
f=4 the results should be great I hope.
Yes indeed, I have meade some really great shots with
this lens.
So even at
2.8 is not so good but probably better than 2.8
version full open.
Thank you!
Alek
On March 14, 2003 09:25 am, gfen wrote:
I think this is what I expected to hear, and I'm surprised i haven't yet.
I'm glad to know that I can point more to teh paper and less to my
often-less-than-ideal exposed negs. The greater bulk of my 4x5 stuff was
done before I really came to full
Folks
I have one here nbg to me. First grovelling reply gets it.
Kind regards
Peter
Uytkownik Roland Mabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Pentax UK answered:
---
Dear Roland,
The *Ist SLR can take all auto focus Pentax lenses.
Hmm, I wonder if this is a sort of a standard answer for a standard customer. I
can imagine that the majority of current Pentax users can't tell the plain
RE: FOR SALE FRIDAY
HERE'S A FEW ITEMS FOR YOU ALL:
http://jcoconnell.com/JCO_AUCT.HTM
=
Items for Sale by jco(1062)
Soligor C/D 135mm F2.0 Lens for Screwmount$99.99
1
Mar-19-03 18:30:10
Soligor C/D 35mm F2.0 Lens
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 05:03 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Dan, you shudda been ther - we had fun!
ann
Ann, don't make him feel bad
--jc
Hi folks,
http://camecame.ddo.jp/cosina/data/293.jpg
From Cosina
Stop down metering, magnesium body, finder view 95%
I have no interest but some folks might :-).
Cheers,
Ken
JCO:
It's nice to see but with MILLIONS
of spotmatics sold and THOUSANDS
of them on the used market in very nice condition
where's the need for this camera???
I totally agree with you. Nothing beats the elegance of a black Spotmatic.
The lenses might be interesting though... if priced correctly,
Hi
my free ticket arrived today - two days too late, so I had to pay 35
Euro entrance :-( If anyone can need this ticket and find a way to get
it fast enough (I'm living near of Dortmund), then feel free to contact
me. I won't take money for the ticket.
Cheers, Heiko
On 03.3.14 0:35 PM, Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi folks,
http://camecame.ddo.jp/cosina/data/293.jpg
From Cosina
Stop down metering, magnesium body, finder view 95%
I have no interest but some folks might :-).
Cheers,
Ken
It reminds the Spotmatic: very different
Ryan K. Brooks wrote:
I can see the red one being a hot pixel, but that white one doesn't look
at all right to me. Either way, I wouldn't call them artifacts.
No.
Maybe it's a dead pixel?
Could happen, I suppose.
keith whaley
Herb Chong wrote:
those are hot pixels and should not
On Friday, Mar 14, 2003, at 06:07 US/Pacific,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently this is a
real problem that costs Pentax dealers and service departments a lot
of
time (ie, money) because of cameras brought in for warranty repair
when
there's nothing wrong with them.
Perhaps the user manuals
I definitely like the Perfekter Body description ;-)
cheers,
caveman
Heiko Hamann wrote:
Hi Rüdiger,
on 14 Mar 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
thank you very much for your detailed answers and for your scanned
flyer. From the flyer you can see that Pentax watches the list. As Pal
complained that
I thought that was a GM/Ford thing... Do you know which Japanese cars
talked?
I remember Door is Ajar, but I thought that was in some big boat of a car.
R
Peter Alling wrote:
Sound's like the Japanese attempt to sell talking cars in the US. We
didn't take to them.
Peter:
I will try to do a little work later to allay your ridicule.
Oh, I hope you didn't take what I said (which was intended as
constructive criticism) as ridicule. As I tried to explain,
usually the buyer can figure out what was meant, and it is only
when there is a chance of confusion that
GM was just following Toyota's lead. Around 1980 maybe.
At 12:37 AM 3/14/2003 -0600, you wrote:
I thought that was a GM/Ford thing... Do you know which Japanese cars talked?
I remember Door is Ajar, but I thought that was in some big boat of a car.
R
Peter Alling wrote:
Sound's like the
French cars has talked for a long time. They always seems something to talk
about you know. :-) I believe that the Peugeot 505 Turbo in the early 80's
were one of the first.
Best wishes,
Roland
From: Ryan K. Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 00:37:04 -0600
I thought that was a
Hi Heiko,
too bad... Even if the *ist can meter with K and M lenses, it's of no use if
you only can use them at the widest aperture setting. I was hoping for
something better...
Oh well, I have to wait for the more upmarket *ist's then.
Best wishes,
Roland
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Heiko
Accept my appologies too. I've been a bit testy lately.
- Original Message -
From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: Is flare bad?
Bob, I'm sorry. I was not trying to win a battle. I thought it
would have been
Alin wrote:
All in one, it seems Pentax still has a lot to work on the *ists,
while we're talking USM and IS. It's time to get real.
REPLY:
Yes, lets wait until they finalize them :o)
It is obvious that Pentax designed both the *ist and *ist D with crippled mounts.
Lets wait and see what
Heiko wrote:
- It has no stop-down coupler.
- I put my SMC-M on it and it didn't work - there was only Av blinking
in the display
- I changed the custom function 17
- now it seemed to try to meter (it showed no aperture number but the
time), but the metered times were wrong. I was told that
Mark wrote:
My Pentax source says It is as backwards compatible as a PZ-1p (less
power zoom contacts)
REPLY:
The *ist D is not finalized yet.
However, I think it would be silly not to have full K-mount compatibility unless
future lenses and equipment demand such limitations.
Pål
Bruce wrote:
You used to say that entry level was where Pentax made most of their money. Did this
change because Pentax may not be competing in the segment.
REPLY:
I didn't say entry level. I said bottom of the barrel. All MZ-series Pentaxes are
entry level except the MZ-S.
All MZ-series
The A 35/2.8 is not a great lens by todays standards. You get similar image quality in
consumer zoom.
Pål
It's nice to see but with MILLIONS
of spotmatics sold and THOUSANDS
of them on the used market in very nice condition
where's the need for this camera???
I think this was a dumb move on their part.
JCO
I'm not so sure. How many people out there have spotties with dead meters or
have had bad
Humm Guys, wait for the final version
--- Roland Mabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi
Heiko,
too bad... Even if the *ist can meter with K and M
lenses, it's of no use if
you only can use them at the widest aperture
setting. I was hoping for
something better...
Oh well, I have to wait
-Original Message-
From: Butch Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's nice to see but with MILLIONS
of spotmatics sold and THOUSANDS
of them on the used market in very nice condition
where's the need for this camera???
I think this was a dumb move on their part.
JCO
I'm not so
On March 14, 2003 02:39 pm, tom wrote:
Plus it's new, it's black, it's minty, it's probably got an improved
meter, a more accurate shutter, channels to have it fixed, and it
won't have been through 30 or 40 years of use.
I think people are buying that new Russian made M42 camera so
millions made and thousands
in VERY NICE condition. By
very nice I mean NEAR MINT,
working perfectly, old but
like new. If it's any near
as nice mechanically as a spottie
is going to be very expensive.
I bet it doesnt even have a mechanical shutter.
If not, it's no spottie replacement thats
for
Plus it's new, it's black, it's minty, it's probably got an improved
meter, a more accurate shutter, channels to have it fixed, and it
won't have been through 30 or 40 years of use.
Not everyone wants to buy a old camera.
tv
My spotmatics are 25-35 years ols BUT because they were so
what new russian one?
JCO
On March 14, 2003 02:39 pm, tom wrote:
Plus it's new, it's black, it's minty, it's probably got an improved
meter, a more accurate shutter, channels to have it fixed, and it
won't have been through 30 or 40 years of use.
I think people are buying
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
It's nice to see but with MILLIONS
of spotmatics sold and THOUSANDS
of them on the used market in very nice condition
where's the need for this camera???
I think this was a dumb move on their part.
JCO
I think it's great. Cosina has been
Butch Black wrote:
It's nice to see but with MILLIONS
of spotmatics sold and THOUSANDS
of them on the used market in very nice condition
where's the need for this camera???
I think this was a dumb move on their part.
JCO
I'm not so sure. How many people out there have spotties with
On March 14, 2003 02:40 pm, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
what new russian one?
I couldn't remember so I did a search. Seems Zenit is making various models
using the M42 mount. They even make one using a K mount. These aren't feature
rich. Shutter goes from 1/8 to 1/500. That's the
1. Brownie Darkroom Lamp Kit $5
Bulb with green amber domes
In original box
2. Kodak Polycontrast Filter Kit $5
#1 through #4 plus holder to mount to lens.
Includes Exposure Computer to adjust time for exposure.
In original box
Heads up,
These make great cases for the Pentax 67.
I use one and it's perfect for the 67 body prism
with normal size lens and hand grip mounted.
I liked them so much I bought three more for other uses!
Theyre well made and the price is great.
Our 87 Maxima did.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that was a GM/Ford thing... Do you know which Japanese cars
talked?
I like the idea of Bessaflex. It's a nice design.
I hope they make a K-mount version.
Speaking of Cosina... Why don't they make autofocus versions of their
excellent prime lenses? Their zooms are cheap, in every sense of the word.
How about a Voigtländer AF serie with excellent optics and metal
Price is the definition of segment. Everything else is marketspeak and
double talk.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...the same camera sold at various price points.
On 03.3.14 1:37 AM, Ryan K. Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that was a GM/Ford thing... Do you know which Japanese cars
talked?
I remember Door is Ajar, but I thought that was in some big boat of a car.
From 1986 for about 5 years, I was driving 300ZX Turbo (Nissan), and it was
a
Again, some folks here expect a camera/lens with flagship features for
entry level prices.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Roland Mabo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: Bessaflex in M42 mount
I like the idea of Bessaflex. It's a
It accepts a trigger wnder also.
- Original Message -
From: KT Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 3:22 AM
Subject: Bessaflex in M42 mount
Hi folks,
http://camecame.ddo.jp/cosina/data/293.jpg
From Cosina
Stop down
http://cgi.ebay.it/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3013326671category=21165
...of course, the auction has been interrupted by the seller due
to an error...
:-|
Gianfranco
=
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
Your Message has been carefully placed in it's very own, specially prepared,
luxuriantly hand crafted circular file where it will receive ALL the dignity and
attention it deserves!
And, in case you're too dumb to understand that. It's been placed in the TRASHCAN,
moron!
Later,
Gary
Gianfranco,
Thanks, that's made my night :-)
Malcolm
http://cgi.ebay.it/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3013326671categ
ory=21165
...of course, the auction has been interrupted by the seller due
to an error...
:-|
KT wrote...
Also, the instrument panel was a star wars or video arcade
game thing with strange histogram-like vertical bar graph, which occupied
most of the front instrument panel, indicating the manifold pressure (I
thought it was) which goes up and down constantly. Other indications such
as
Some people will try and sell anything, even stuff
that isn't made yet lol.
--- Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.it/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3013326671category=21165
...of course, the auction has been interrupted by
the seller due
to an error...
:-|
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Plus it's new, it's black, it's minty, it's probably got
an improved
meter, a more accurate shutter, channels to have it fixed, and it
won't have been through 30 or 40 years of use.
Not everyone wants to
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
millions made and thousands
in VERY NICE condition. By
very nice I mean NEAR MINT,
working perfectly, old but
like new.
Funny, I've seen exactly 2 and neither were for sale.
You must mean !!!LQQK MINTY!!! ebay
And, in case you're too dumb to understand that. It's been placed in the
TRASHCAN, moron!
What's this all about? It wasn't my message, but why all this hostility?
Lukasz
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Gary L. Murphy wrote:
And, in case you're too dumb to understand that. It's been placed in
the TRASHCAN, moron!
If you're upset because someone's posting a for-sale message, its commonly
accepted to do so on Friday. We also love our Collin, because he finds
strange things
this close to manufacturing, the hardware specs are set in stone and this is a
hardware specification. what the firmware does is another story.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 14:06
Subject: Re: CeBit
Hi all,
I have a question concerning the use of a Takumar lens with k-mount adaptor
on (for example) my K1000:
Will the automatic diaphragm work or do I have to close the diaphragm for
each shot manually?
Especially I thought of using a SMC Takumar 20mm lens which will be less
expensive than
Perhaps they are the only people in the business (other than Leica) who
recognize that autofocus technology is not all that accurate (or desirable)
and are unwilling to compromise their rather fine optics. I personally like
the built quality of their MF lenses. As for the Bessaflex, it just
Does anyone know if Mike Johnston's article Lens Contrast And the Basics of
MTF is available anywhere?
Cheers, - Andrew.
On Friday, Mar 14, 2003, at 13:35 US/Pacific,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the idea of Bessaflex. It's a nice design.
I hope they make a K-mount version.
I believe they already are, just not under the Cosina or Voigtlander
names. Unless I'm mistaken, the Vivitar 3800N is made by Cosina.
--
Gary.We here in the Brooks home are sad to hear this news.We are cat folk(and BW
flower folk)
and know what you are going through.We had two special cats leave us last year.I did
manage to get
a number of pictures too and they also have graced the PUG.
A new kitten enterd our home at Xmas but
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Automatic diaphragm on adapted Takumar?
forget it the 20mm SMC Takumar sucks.
All the Kmount 20mms are much better.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: U+B Scheffler
Subject: OT: Automatic diaphragm on adapted Takumar?
Hi Herb:
I really do not want to go into this old argument, but if you want to
explore the subject you could start here:
http://medfmt.8k.com/third/af.html
I simply made a comment that not everyone appreciates the autofocus
technology. I also do have some personal experience indincating that
If you're interested I can check in my local store, they have a K 20mm for
sale. What's the going price for these beuties?
Paul
The real answer to your question is no, you have to stop the lens down
manually for metering and for exposure.
The 20mm is lovingly called the Bow-Wow Takumar by some
saying you don't want autofocus or you don't like it is not the same as saying it's no
good. it's an old argument because there are a specific set of circumstances where MF
will consistently outperform AF of any recent vintage, and that is a small percentage
of the time. the rest of the time,
the article selects its data to support its argument and ignores the rest.
What rest? Seriously - I'm really curious.
Lukasz
PS. I finally did it - I changed the name of a thread! Yippie! ;-)
Me too. One for the front row please. Popcorn. Salted (can't stand sweet
popcorn). What time's the show start? Oh! Started already, I'll be quiet
now.
Whoa! I missed the beginning of this one. Sounds like a great flame war
brewing. What was the original message?
Paul
Gary L. Murphy wrote:
Hi,
After only 4 months of use and 12 rolls, the camera refuses to boot-up. It stays
with the film sts indicator (little roll)
blinking.
I'm sure it's not a power problem cause I've switched to battery grip, same behaviour.
As addt'l info I was about to finish a 36 exp
fuji film, turned off,
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 16:16:03 -0500
From: KT Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 03.3.14 1:37 AM, Ryan K. Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought that was a GM/Ford thing... Do you know
which Japanese cars
talked?
I remember Door is Ajar, but I thought that was in
some big boat of a car.
stopped down performance, not on a tripod, not using slide film, subject farther away
than a few feet.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Lukasz Kacperczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 18:33
Subject: AF vs. MF [was: Re: Bessaflex in M42 mount]
I traded for Super A last year. I knew at the time it was a project camera.
Everything on it seams to work with one minor exception. I get the
occasional photo with a black stripe across the bottom of the photo. There
is no detail in the stripe. It shows up once in about every 5 to 8 frames.
- Original Message -
From: Jerry in Houston
Subject: Re: *ist and the lens mount
I don't know abou5t the car, but I do remember a
friend in the 80's who had a camera called the Minolta
Talker. I can't remember everything it said, but I do
remember than when there was not enough
- Original Message -
From: James Fellows
Subject: Super A with issues
I traded for Super A last year. I knew at the time it was a project
camera.
Everything on it seams to work with one minor exception. I get the
occasional photo with a black stripe across the bottom of the photo.
stopped down performance,
I don't really understand - you mean that if the lens is stopped down, then
the AF inaccuracy is neglible? If that's what you're saying, I can't agree.
Something is either sharp or not. Even when stopped down, there's a definite
plain of focus that you can see on the
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
