Thanks to all who commented. I confess I _did_ play around with the sky a
little in PS Elements, but was never happy with what I got so I left it
alone. It _was_ a grey November day and after the bright Indian Summer days
of October, November in Wisconsin is mostly grey, cold and rainy. It
Say these are correct. How do Canon Nikon deal with it? Do they have
more effective solution?
Alan Chan
1) Throw more ED and other special glass at it, upping the price of the lens.
2) Optimize to limit CA at the expense of other optical flaws.
3) Supposedly the 14/2.8 Nikkor has problems on
So the *sit D is a flag ship, that's supposed to support PS sales, which is
supposed to support the sales of medical/industrial products...:-)
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 29.
Fra: John Mustarde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I sure won't be ponying up my hard-earned bucks for any expensive new
lens with this nice CA feature. As far as I'm concerned, the DA 14
is crapola just because of the color fringing. I thought the purpose
of making a digital-specific lens would be to
Hi,
Dada Madonna?
I Googled it, and that didn't help much.
You're going to have to help me out here, Bob! g
Dada was an art movement of the 20s and 30s which set out to shock and
scandalise. It can be considered a precursor of surrealism. It often
used the juxtaposition of unrelated
Given Rollei and Hasselblads 6x6 systems both take digital backs, and
have done for quite a few years now, it would be nice for pentax to at
least follow suit with its medium format gear too.
Antonio
On 29 Jun 2004, at 01:30, Pål Jensen wrote:
Jens wrote:
So, my point is: Don't expect line up
Not according to fotoMagazin/Olympus. They hand polish the lenses for the
E-1.
I don't know if they are very expensive, but I guess the manual labour is a
relatively small investment, compared to the otherwise presumeably mostly
robot-made camera body, centre of a totally new camera system. I
Right. You are saying, that Pentax is now targeting their lens production at
digital (APS format) cameras. Sounds reasonable enough to me.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 29. juni
This is the Pentax 'Efina', a small APS PointShoot, a funny little thing.
Sven
Zitat von Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Great Portrait!
What is the smaller, grey and white camera to the right of the MZ-5n?
Pål Jensen wrote:
Although this fits well in with Pentax lack of marketing
strategies (perhaps it is a strategy!), I was actually told
that Pentax had no plan to meet demand of the *ist D ever.
They would never make any volume with this camera. This was
at the introduction and plans may
The easy (and affordable) way to go arround this is to use two camera
flashes. One on the camera, perhaps reflected off a wall, a door, a piece of
white cardboard or an umbrella. And a second flash - to reduce shadows -
mounted on at tripod and fitted with a slave triggering cell. Some
That photo is Exhibit A. Warning: This list will cause you
to open your purse strings. That is a lot 'o stuff, Sven.
keller.schaefer wrote:
I had this idea of taking them all out on a bright day - for a family photo of
Pentax gear. Here is the result:
www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/19.JPG
So go out and buy some film.
David Miers wrote:
snip.
I was going to sell off a bunch of my film stuff, and had it on the stands
taking pictures to promote said sale, but this created excessive fondling
and...sigh...I couldn't do it!
Well said. I believe Pentax is seated between two chairs - one of the non
enthusiast and PS market - and one of a niche market for nice, exclusive
products - limidted stuff, that appeals to people who use/regard their
camera as some kind jewelry, that can even take pictures.
And then there's the
they are very expensive lenses.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 3:27 AM
Subject: RE: Lens manufacturing
Not according to fotoMagazin/Olympus. They hand polish the lenses for the
E-1.
I don't know if
it's expensive enough that paying only $8K is a bargain. the person selling
it is the same person i bought my A* 400/2.8 from. occasionally, i think of
it.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 10:50 PM
Subject:
Mmm not using webmail at all and sometimes, I experience this too.
Guess it's the more PDML rather than your mail.
Thibouille
-Message d'origine-
De : frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 29 juin 2004 0:48
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: PAW - Man Getting a Shoe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a $500 used Sigma 14/3.5 because I couldn't scrape together $1300
for a new Nikkor 14/2.8.
That 14/2.8 Nikkor is actually a rebadged Tamron.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Hi,
I would like to know: How does the K24/f3.5 compare to the K24/f2.8 with
respect to contrast, distortion, vignetting, and corner resolution?
Arnold
A magnesium back si enough for me - I can do without the gold writing...
Cheers
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: David Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 29. juni 2004 02:02
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: MZ-S Limited
Hi Jens
that's is interesting, could you name some flash with integrated slvae
trigger cell?
I had an external one from Hama that died quickly
thanks in advance
Markus
white cardboard or an umbrella. And a second flash - to reduce shadows -
mounted on at tripod and fitted with a slave
I have 2 Osram SC18 SERVO (w. sensor) and one S18 SERVO (without sensor).
Quite clever, since they have a built in clamp, which allows them to be
attached to - let's say a door, a table etc. And I have a Phoenix 46x, which
looks like a camera flash with a hot shoe mount.
I know that some BRAUN
This is my first post to this list so bear with me if I goof it up.
I have been using one of these:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=3860item=3822497139;
tc=photo
along with 3 Bought at the hardware store 10 inch reflectors equipped with
Daylight 100 watt
Compact Flourescent
Herb wrote:
in total camera sales, Pentax has been hovering around 3%
market share for nearly a decade. the camera division lost money for a
couple of years before rebounding for 2003, but the most optimistic forecast
by Pentax shows market share holding nearly constant. the only places where
Herb wrote:
50%? not from what i read today. imaging products, which includes cameras,
maybe, but not the camera division.
REPLY:
50% is photo related products which means for Pentax cameras and lenses. Without
cameras, no lens sales. Mind you, in overturn the lens volume is probably quite
Malcolm wrote:
It seems a bizarre way to market any of their products to manufacture loss
leaders, without some 'in your face' advertising for the range of camera
products available in store to the general public. How are you going to
recoup money invested in R D, without some form of high
There you go:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=21973item=3823353103
rd=1ssPageName=WDVW
This one is without computer (not SC - slave computer - just S - slave)
sensor for AE control.
I some times carry on in my camera bag!
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you search ebay for slave, flash
There are more flashes available.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 29. juni 2004 14:24
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Lighting for ebay sales?
Cesar wrote:
I shot almost 13 rolls in a wedding this past weekend.
Reply:
Are you in the market for a Flash Trax (:-) - or do you actually prefere
film for some jobs?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Cesar Matamoros II
Of course, most folks that I know (consumer types) think in exactly the opposite way.
Use digital for important stuff since you can see your result. After all, you may
have blurred that shot or cut a head off, etc. For consumers, there is no fancy post
processing with digital. They print
I have, what i hope will be, an interesting and exciting photo op this weekend(Canada
Day
long
weekend up here):-)
The Ressor family,one of the first settlers in the Markham area of York region, is
having
their 200th
year family
Antonio wrote:
Given Rollei and Hasselblads 6x6 systems both take digital backs, and have done for
quite a few years now, it would be nice for pentax to at least follow suit with its
medium format gear too.
REPLY:
I believe Pentax will release MF based digital solution the moment prices are
I'm looking for a second hand AF Pentax body.
For now, I have a P30/P3 and very soon a K1000 but would like to have an AF
one for the usual family stuff.
Any clue? Would an SFX or Z70/PZ70 do the trick? I really do not a have a
budget for sqomething like PZ1P/Z1P.
Anyone with feedback on this
Cory wrote:
How sure are you about that $20 Million? At that price, given that they
can't have expected to sell more than a few thousand units netting perhaps
$2-300 per camera, it seems like total lunacy to even consider making them.
Of course, if that $20 Million could be spread between
Email is a funny thing. When I was running my own mail server, I used to do
periodic propagation tests. There are servers set up around the world for this
that bounce a message back to you with time and date stamps. Quite often I would
get messages back from Australia in a 1/2 hour or so and
A Z50 or a Z20 could be a good choice for you (the Z70 has a plastic bajonet).
SFXes do not show the aperture in the finder - something I find important.
Sven
Zitat von Thibs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm looking for a second hand AF Pentax body.
For now, I have a P30/P3 and very soon a K1000 but
BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You should really buy records, that way you can play them
backwards.and get your wife, dog, house, car and job back.
Norm
(I hope you were drinking when you posted this...)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 20:30:59 +0100
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry
I believe that same kit is in the BH Photo catalog for $199.
It is basically a portrait setup. If she is selling clothing it may be just what
she needs. It would not be the best setup for small products.
--
Gonz wrote:
A friend of mine is upgrading her photo setup for ebay sales in response
to
Jens Bladt wrote:
It seems that some of you are still buying film gear. Are you camera
collectors or do you actually still use film (like me)?
I have been very close to selling all my 35mm film gear (Pentax bodies). I
wonder if I should keep it or sell. Is ait already to late to sell at
MZ/ZX-5n!
CW
- Original Message -
From: keller.schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: Looking for 2nd hand pentax
A Z50 or a Z20 could be a good choice for you (the Z70 has a plastic
bajonet).
SFXes do not show the aperture
I think that backwater camera company called Canon has a DSLR that will
rotate images taken vertically.
Jim A.
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:50:56 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wouldn't it be nice
Resent-From: [EMAIL
These suggestions I ahave been seeing all suppose she is using something she can
sync to studio strobes. If she is using a digital PS as many eBayers do none of
these suggestions are much use to her. For serious small product photography in
that case I would want a couple of baby spotlights and
In the browser of PS CS you have to instruct it to rotate it, it will remember this
the next time and show the thumbnail correct, as well as open the image correct.
It would have been nice if the instruction came from the camera though.
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 14:50, cbwaters wrote:
FJW If the
JB The slave flash seem to work with a digital camera like my Sony F717 - but
JB for slow speeds only - from app. 1/2 second and above! So it's no good for
JB digital portraits or things like that. For stills, it's fine, though (long
JB shutter speeds). Someone here might care to explain this
Other than the freight train sound my SF-1 makes when the shutter is tripped,and the
film
advances,i'm
pretty satisfied with that one.
Good AF,solid.Not hard on batteries and has the pop up flash.
I like my PZ-1 much better though,now that i have a finder i can see through .
Dave B
For my Picture Every So Often:
http://bellsouthpwp.net/c/b/cbwaters/disney/roll_1/Jelly_4.html
Taken at Disney World in the Epcot park, through the glass.
*ist D, F35-80 @ 48mm F4.5, 1/45 second, 1600 ISO, ***L
Shot at 1:41:38 PM on 5/24/04
Ain't EXIF info groovy?
Cory
---
Outgoing mail is
Jim,
I am fortunate to have a wonderful relationship and trust my photo
developers. I have even worked behind the counter for them. I am part of
the family. Therefore I have total confidence in them.
I can more quickly view the prints than the computer screen when editing. I
usually take
PJ in anything resembling volumes. Eg. the Nikon F series cameras
PJ have less than 5% pro share. Hasselblad less than 10%. Obviously
PJ the high-end is totally dependent on amateurs willing to spend.
PJ However, amateurs willing to spend $15 000 on a digital back are
PJ rare indeed.
Hi Pal, do
More ...
Slow slave response is a problem with some digitals.
I wish Pentax' ps cameras had a shoe or sync connector
to allow a proper sync with an external flash. Bummer.
Right now the Nikon 5000/5200/5700 have been going pretty
cheap. Nice outfits and very practical for this purpose.
Collin
It's expected that the new Minolta D7 will have this feature since the
existing film 7 already does change the numbers and data on the back as well
when you turn it to vertical. So they already have the technology in it
that knows the cameras orientation.
-Original Message-
From: Jim
Music to hate yourself by? I have always subscribed to
the idea that
music
should make you feel better, not make you want to kill yourself.
THANKS. As a result of reading the above post, I now have
You don't have to
call me darlin, darlin, You never even called me by my name
erm, photos please, sir?!? we want to SEE the evidence to back up your
ludicrous claims!
;-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 June 2004 3:45 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss (E-mail)
Subject: A photographic weekend - a!
I have
i wanna come too!!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 June 2004 11:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: A photographic weekend - a!
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June
cbwaters wrote:
For my Picture Every So Often:
http://bellsouthpwp.net/c/b/cbwaters/disney/roll_1/Jelly_4.html
Taken at Disney World in the Epcot park, through the glass.
*ist D, F35-80 @ 48mm F4.5, 1/45 second, 1600 ISO, ***L
Shot at 1:41:38 PM on 5/24/04
Ain't EXIF info groovy?
You bet it
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
That's right. Works great for my SONY. I hardly ever think of the missing
viewfinder anymore. It works great - and even enlarges the image center for
manual focusing.
One of my favorite things about switching from the Sony DSC-F717 to my
*ist D is that I
I WOULD worry about a polarizer, because they are normally thicker.
DJE
Any polarizer on a 20mm will give a weird result as polarization
won't be uniform over the whole field of view.
Andre
I see/understand, Alex.
I just think Pentax should have made or make a all-in-one camera like the
SONY DSC F717 (rangefinder) or the Olympus E-20 or dom Nikons (SLR). I agree
with you as to the the noice problem - to some extend - and sertainly about
focusing in the dark. I made concert shots with
Thanks Frantisek - the answer I was hoping for.
It works fine with external flash (AF280T in the hot shoe) + slave
flash(es). I think the sync cord option is meant for dedicated flashes
only - and i don't want to invest more in the SONY. But I admit to using it
more than any other camera at the
...now I also know why somebody calls the didicated SONY flash pseudo-TTL -
it has obvoiusly the same pre-flash function as the built in flash!
Intersting: No good in conjunction with studio flash set-ups. Thanks,
Frantisek!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Hmmm... So thats how Pentax spend the advertising budget!?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 29. juni 2004 16:03
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: The public and Pentax
Cory wrote:
I think it could be done on the ist-D in a firmware upgrade. I figure if the camera
could know when the vertical release is used on the D-BG1 then it could easily
mark those images for rotation in whatever browser you are using.
Christian
-Original Message-
From: cbwaters [EMAIL
Nice. Love the colors and the way the jelly behind complements the main subject.
Christian
-Original Message-
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jun 29, 2004 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: PESO
For my Picture Every So Often:
Dada gloried in the useless, a Dada icon was the fur lined tea cup.
(I forget the artist).
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
Dada Madonna?
I Googled it, and that didn't help much.
You're going to have to help me out here, Bob! g
Dada was an art movement of the 20s and 30s which set out
It reminds me of the photo I took during one of my trips to south Florida.
I had taken all my screwmount gear with me. While waiting for my friend to
get out of work and after cleaning the gear I set it on a table with my new
MZ-S.
I have acquired some more screwmount gear in the interim :-)
Jens,
A lot of digicams use a prefire (similar to P-TTL) to determine the flash
intensity in advance of the actual exposure. The prefire is usually too
small and too close to the main firing to notice its presence with your bare
eyes. Thus, attempting to slave an external flash will not only
BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You should really buy records, that way you can play them
backwards.and get your wife, dog, house, truck and job back.
Norm
(I hope you were drinking when you posted this...)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 20:30:59 +0100
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry
Thanks Graywolf and all others who have responded. It sounds like those
continous setups are a PIA and too hot.
Yes, in fact she is selling clothing, and that's one thing that prompted
her to try to move from her current setup, which is an inexpensive PS
digital, I don't know what
For some reason I don't comprehend I'm putting this in my archive.
Amita Guha wrote:
Music to hate yourself by? I have always subscribed to
the idea that
music
should make you feel better, not make you want to kill yourself.
THANKS. As a result of reading the above post, I
Well, this is just fantastic. (I don't know what else to say beyond that).
cbwaters wrote:
For my Picture Every So Often:
http://bellsouthpwp.net/c/b/cbwaters/disney/roll_1/Jelly_4.html
Taken at Disney World in the Epcot park, through the glass.
*ist D, F35-80 @ 48mm F4.5, 1/45 second, 1600 ISO,
Thanks, Anthony.
If you ever recall that name, please let me know.
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Anthony Farr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 29. juni 2004 18:01
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Digital camera
Cory,
EXIF is groovy, but your image is even groovier. Very nice - one of
the better jelly shots that I have seen. Nice work.
Bruce
Tuesday, June 29, 2004, 7:33:33 AM, you wrote:
c For my Picture Every So Often:
c http://bellsouthpwp.net/c/b/cbwaters/disney/roll_1/Jelly_4.html
c Taken at
Tanja,
And I am not even close in terms of some other people on this list.
Hmmm, I may have to do a family photo of my own now - ohhh, photo
project!
Maybe I need to include Pentax memorabilia,
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography
It's OK!
I learned that on the woodworkers list.
Anyone need any good used WW tools? ;)
Don
-Original Message-
From: cbwaters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 8:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:New Guy-- Lighting for ebay sales?
Welcome Don,
Beware, this
Ditto.
Norm
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Well, this is just fantastic. (I don't know what else to say beyond
that).
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Jeff Post wrote:
I am wrestling with that same question, although it sounds as if
you have far more gear then me. My largest investment is in a single
lens. Since the *istD works with A* lenses, I do not expect them to
depreciate considerably. The value of my
THE FASTEST!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 29. juni 2004 21:05
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: M80-200 vs F70-210 ?
I am leaving within a few days for Mongolia and decided to
I suspect my future is with 10D/dD100/*istD level cameras, so I see very
little point in switching brands. I admit that I have no experience
with these other cameras. OTOH, I've been very pleased with the *istD.
My problem with selling my film gear is that I wan to keep one film
camera, and
Or rather geese in a row. I was down at the shore, hoping for a glimpse
of the osprey parents that lived in a nest, when these guys swam by. I'm
curious to see what you guys think of it. Check out the little guy in
the right of the frame looking at me.
On 29/6/04, Amita Guha, discombobulated, offered:
Or rather geese in a row. I was down at the shore, hoping for a glimpse
of the osprey parents that lived in a nest, when these guys swam by. I'm
curious to see what you guys think of it. Check out the little guy in
the right of the frame looking
Cotty wrote:
On 29/6/04, Amita Guha, discombobulated, offered:
Or rather geese in a row. I was down at the shore, hoping for a glimpse
of the osprey parents that lived in a nest, when these guys swam by. I'm
curious to see what you guys think of it. Check out the little guy in
the right of the
Steve wrote:
My problem with selling my film gear is that I wan to keep one film
camera, and that would be the MZ-S. It's also the only one that I could
actually get much money for.
Reply:
I second that, exactly.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig
Hi, Sven,
Nice family reunion but a serious problem you have! A whole
generation of family members are missing -- S.F. and his siblings
are not there. Grandpa Asahi is not happy. You need to call them
up:-)
Yefei
[...]
www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/19.JPG
[...]
Sven
Hello Boris,
My screen resolution is 1400 X 1050 on a 16 LCD. The reason I state
that is because when I look at the pic I see One dot, another dot,
and the city - I really can't make out the man or his dog other than
two small blobs. Maybe a bigger image would help.
I do like how you framed
Jeff Post wrote:
Jens,
I am wrestling with that same question, although it sounds as if
you have far more gear then me. My largest investment is in a single
lens. Since the *istD works with A* lenses, I do not expect them to
depreciate considerably.
OK, I rather agree.
The
Interesting to speculate on how the 54% do digital photography when only
40% own a digital camera.
John
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:47:05 -0400, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I bet it's a fair sample of serious amateurs. Many serious
5512 in March 2004 from Canada
John
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:52:18 +0200, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
In my effort of understanding (guessing?) something better about the
*ist D,
I'll ask all *ist D owners to post the main part of the serial No. of the
camera they own, together
John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting to speculate on how the 54% do digital photography when only
40% own a digital camera.
What makes you think only 40% own a digital camera?
40% own a *DSLR*
Many more than that own digicams.
John
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:47:05 -0400, Mark
True!
John
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:49:13 -0400, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting to speculate on how the 54% do digital photography when only
40% own a digital camera.
What makes you think only 40% own a digital camera?
40% own a *DSLR*
GRIN!
Isn't it strange? We all tend to think everyone will, or at least should, do as
we do.
I say wait a another year. I think you will find that some have grabbed on to
digital and never looked back, and some have become disallusioned and gone back
to film. Some others will be using both,
Only 75% of them actually use their cameras?
--
John Forbes wrote:
Interesting to speculate on how the 54% do digital photography when
only 40% own a digital camera.
John
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:47:05 -0400, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GRIN to U too, Graywolf. I do not disagree.
But I do both digital and film - and I will keep on doing that for - maybe
as long as film is available. At least 6x6 i think. But my digital
production grows for every day.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Go apply for a job, Dario. This sounds good enough for me!
:-)
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 29. juni 2004 23:23
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Selling Pentax 35mm gear (WAS
Thanks, Bob,
I knew about when Dada was (or at least started), and I knew the part about
shocking, but that's about it.
H...
Next time, I'll ask Milan to - oh, never mind... vbg
thanks,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true.
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
affordable new as it is. The Pentax lenses are just too expensive for a lens
I would probably only use once or twice per year although they would retain
their resale value.
As you know, there are bargains to be had. I bought the 17/4 Tak for
100
Hey Folks,
I'm in the market for a good fish-eye lens for my ZX-5n. (Well, really, it's
for me.)
I'm looking at buying either a used Pentax 17/4.0, or perhaps a Sigma
15/2.8. Does anyone on this list have comments about either lens? I tend to
stick with Pentax lenses, but if the 17/4.0 is
Hi, Bob,
I know!
I think it's overly aggressive anti-spam filtering or something.
Whatever, quite a few friends have complained that it sometimes takes
several tries to get through to me. Maybe time to change to Yahoo.
BTW, thanks for the (unspecified) compliment of my PUG. vbg
cheers,
frank
Wonderful!!
Hey, ya can't go wrong with cute fuzzy little goslings (or ducklings, or
whatever they are).
Great grab, Amita.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Jens,
I have only one lens worth much. I have four Pentax lenses, but
the sale of my 300 might fund a jump to another camera format. I mainly
shoot nature and landscapes. I do zero people photography. My brother in
law tried to convince me that people add scale to the shot. I
since we're going to be gone over the weekend, thought I'd post this early.
Tamron 28-80/3.5-4.2 with Adaptall 2 K/M mount.
$25 + shpg. PayPal.
Collin
- Original Message -
From: Amita Guha
Subject: PAW: ducks in a row
http://www.sunny16.net/photos/paw/2004-06-29.html
Amita
Cool shot.
b
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
