On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:11:01AM -0500, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Cotty has a hairpiece
I was told we didn't have to discuss merkins on this bboard ...
On Jan 21, 2005, at 1:25 PM, frank theriault wrote:
[...] and Cotty's hairpiece aren't inflammatory, [...]
Is it made of Nomex or something?
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
On Jan 21, 2005, at 2:32 PM, John Francis wrote:
Well, if you *will* use web browsers as mail clients ...
FWIW Apple Mail sees it as an email address, too.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
Actually it's not fungus, the rear aspheric element separates, it can
look like fungus or simply a bit of haze on a surface or anything
in between. Unfortunately your problem is the same one I have. That's
why new parts from Pentax are hoped for.
Chad wrote:
Peter,
I have a 28-70/4 that I
On Jan 21, 2005, at 5:38 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It would be what, about a 300mm equiv. on the istD?
That'd be about right. My FA200/2.8 is telling me it wants to behave
like a smaller, lighter 300/2.8. It's Cotty's fault.
Maybe instead of buying a digital body I could just cut my film into
John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:11:01AM -0500, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Cotty has a hairpiece
I was told we didn't have to discuss merkins on this bboard ...
That's just much too much information...
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you
Wow, the prices on the A*85 1.4 and A*135 1.8 are crazy. They are great, but
they are not worth that much.
DagT
fra: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jcolwell.ca/_SPLOSdb/SPLOSdb-2004-09-31.pdf
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:38:37 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang,
My 200 F2.5 (earlier model) is one of my favourite lenses on the ist-d...
Vic
I find it absolutely a joy to use my older lenses on the Ist-D. Nothing makes
me happier than to put my 85F2, 200F2.5 or 120 f2.8 on my ist D and shoot
away. I often think how much I would have to invest to replace these older
lenses
with new autofocus lenses as so many other owners of other
On 21/1/05, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
That'd be about right. My FA200/2.8 is telling me it wants to behave
like a smaller, lighter 300/2.8. It's Cotty's fault.
Guilty as charged, punishment: 10 lashes. No, make that 20. Please.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 20/1/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Too inflamatory, just like gun control, abortion and politics. OTOH,
bikes, beer, SUV's, coffee, and Cotty's hairpiece aren't inflammatory,
That's the irksome thing - I don't have a piece of hair.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
Haven't seen this pop up yet, so sorry if it has by the time this mail
hits the list.
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/info/20050121e.html
Version 1.01 contains the following change:
At the long time exposure situation such as astronomical photography,
green noise might be generated partially
Dave wrote: Oh well.Might be nice to sit back and enjoy a show for a
change.LOL
Good attitude. Seeing an event through the viewfinder often isn't as much
fun as just seeing it.
Pat White
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:20:05 -0800, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So THAT'S why religion isn't allowed.
(;
Oh, we're allowed to show photos of religion, we just can't talk about
it is all.
Too inflamatory, just like gun
From: Norman Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I sent an email to that address and received a reply with one of my
photos (non-digital) attached and a gift certificate for 10 cents.
Norm
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Francis wrote:
1/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Netscape mail
On 21/1/05, John Francis, discombobulated, unleashed:
I was told we didn't have to discuss merkins on this bboard ...
No, firkins.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 21 Jan 2005 at 9:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, the prices on the A*85 1.4 and A*135 1.8 are crazy. They are great, but
they are not worth that much.
They obviously are if that's what people are willing to pay.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
On 21/1/05, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
On Jan 21, 2005, at 1:25 PM, frank theriault wrote:
[...] and Cotty's hairpiece aren't inflammatory, [...]
Is it made of Nomex or something?
ok ok, I give in - I cannot tell a lie.
Here it is:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare5.html
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, if you *will* use web browsers as mail clients ...
Agreed. I have to set the one at work to accept html mail, as many of the
dipsticks who are supposed to be running the place think it's good to send 15Kb
messages to ask simple questions.
Wow, the prices on the A*85 1.4 and A*135 1.8 are crazy. They are
great, but
they are not worth that much.
I think they are well worth the price :-). Besides, there is nothing in
the
current lens line as good as these (in the same focal range).
Antti-Pekka
On 21/1/05, Fairy Gal, discombobulated, unleashed:
[snip]
My new guy is fantastic and my
kids adore him. They go back to school on Monday, so hopefully I will have
a little more time on my hands
and that's not all! ;-)
Hey, you told him that we slept in the same room ?
Good luck on
It's not a problem to use older lenses. I have a couple of M
series lenses and find them easy to use with the *istDS.
Install lens. Set exposure to manual, set desired aperture.
Point at meter target, press AE-L button. Frame, focus, tweak
settings if you feel it's warranted. Take picture.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:51:30 +, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over here a great deal of that additional markup goes to the
supermarket, not to the grower, because they will happily milk those
of us who do not buy on price alone.
I try and avoid buying coffee in the supermarket if
Oh, no... what have I started? grin
I had a shock when I realised how small it is (compared with my MZ-6).
It would be smaller even if I put a winder (I've saw one at ~50 euro
and it looks nice - but I have no interest in buying it. Btw: the
camera+repairs - i.e. cleanupfoam replacement - costed
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: A* 200/2.8 Value
Guilty as charged, punishment: 10 lashes. No, make that 20. Please.
You REALLY must meet my wife.
William Robb
witty sig file
You don't appreciate a lot of stuff in school until you get older.
Little things like being
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually it's not fungus, the rear aspheric element separates, it can
look like fungus or simply a bit of haze on a surface or anything
in between. Unfortunately your problem is the same one I have. That's
why new parts from Pentax are hoped
fra: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 21 Jan 2005 at 9:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, the prices on the A*85 1.4 and A*135 1.8 are crazy. They are great,
but
they are not worth that much.
They obviously are if that's what people are willing to pay.
I was waiting for that
fra: Antti-Pekka Virjonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wow, the prices on the A*85 1.4 and A*135 1.8 are crazy. They are
great, but
they are not worth that much.
I think they are well worth the price :-). Besides, there is nothing in
the
current lens line as good as these (in the same focal
My 200 F2.5 (earlier model) is one of my favourite lenses on the ist-d...
Not on any digital body (yet), but: Used to have an A* 200/2.8. For a
while, had the 200/2.8 and a K 200/2.5. Now only have the K 200/2.5. I
guess I'm just a dinosaur...
Fred
BTW, another poster mentioned being limited to center-weighted and spot
metering. Note that M and earlier lenses always have that limitation
anyway on any body, unless you modify them as Mark Roberts describes on
his web site, in which case I believe you'd get matrix metering with them
on the
Just a quick revision which will, hopefully, expedite the sale.
USD130, packaged, insured and shipped anywhere, or AUD175, packaged,
insured, shipped in Australia.
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:04:14 +, Cotty wrote:
It's Cotty's fault.
Guilty as charged, punishment: 10 lashes. No, make that 20. Please.
Masochist: Hurt me!
Sadist:No!
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Hi
I am interested in purchasing a superwide lens, like SMC-A 20/2.8, FA
20/2.8, Tokina ATX 17/3.5, Tamron SP 17/3.5 or similiar, for reasonable
price (well, I couldn't afford JCO's SMC 18/3.5 sold few days ago...).
If you have something interesting, please contact me off-list.
Thanks
Jerry
For Sale:
Metz mecablitz 32 MZ-3 with standard foot, boxed, instructions, soft case
plus dedicated Pentax SCA 3701 M3 module also with instruction booklet
GN 37 @ ISO 100
Tilt Swivel reflector Quadrolight
Motor Zoom
System SCA-3000 / SCA-300
Integrated AF measuring beam
$50 + $10 shipping
For sale:
Pentax SMC-M 40mm f/2.8, the pancake lens! EX condition. Exterior
shows very minor wear at some of the sharp edges. Glass is nice,
especially since I had it cleaned last year to remove some dust.
$150 includes shipping in the continental U.S.
Pentax Tele-Takumar 300mm f/6.3
Beeautiful photograph.
It's funny how many digital BW photographs have this metal greyish - or
silver greyish apperance!
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 21. januar 2005
Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just this past weekend I bought a Bialetti coffee maker.
http://www.bialettishop.com/MokaExpressMain.htm
Really designed for making espresso, but makes 2 mugs of
regular coffee.
Best coffee I've had was brewed in a Sunbeam vacuum coffee
maker. We had
It seems it does NOT work anymore with IST-whatever (including film one).
Thibouille
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:14:09 -0500, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, another poster mentioned being limited to center-weighted and spot
metering. Note that M and earlier lenses always
And for the rest of the whole world too...
We love George...
Albano
--- Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, for almost half of the country that is a
negative ad, so I
suppose they'll break even.
j
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:06:25 -0500, Bill Owens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While
Cool collection,
My favorite is the Foo Fighters' one. Great logo.
Regards
Albano
--- John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, for those curious, I took a higher-res photo of
my name badge/pin
collection (which includes a few new ones):
http://www.neovenator.com/special/pins.jpg (NOTE:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mom at 90
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/Mom1.htm
Comments welcome.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Really nice, Marnie.
The BW rendition really suits the subject
Wendy
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Too inflamatory, just like gun control, abortion and politics.
OTOH,
bikes, beer, SUV's, coffee, and Cotty's hairpiece aren't
inflammatory,
so we may talk about them as often as we please. vbg
Can we talk about his codpiece? Not that I want
It isn't. It meters almost instantly, and it's never deterred me from
buying more K or M lenses.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/20/2005 2:54:31 PM
For some reason, this strikes me as hellishly awkward. I'm familiar
with the
Green Button on my MZ-S, and it's nothing like this with M series
lenses.
Do
This one does not have the sticky mirror problem. Brassing
on corners by the strap lugs, and unfortunately someone neatly
engraved their name on the body and the lens barrel, so it
is a user. Everything functions properly. I put some new
foam in the back rails a few months ago. Includes
Good news:
Firstcall have in stock Pan-F, Delta 100, 400, 3200 and according to them it
is still being produced at the present time despite Ilford being in
receivership. Hope this is of some help.
John
John Whittingham
Technician
-- Original Message ---
From: Mark Roberts
Lovely!
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
I jump into the matter just to add something photographic, hope
you'll enjoy it:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3054083
Tech. data: LX, 50/1.4, Agfa Scala.
Hi Frank,
I like contacts, and enlarged contacts as well. But having Photoshop
make an automated contacts sheet or gallery in addition is a real plus.
Shel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A final thought: I posted this photo because I was looking though
some old contacts (from the summer),
Great idea.
My reaction to this is that I would take it in a portrait orientation, to
acentuate the proportions of the hands eliminat the extraneous upper LH
corner include the finger tips from both hand.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jan 20, 2005
This is a very early photo. I don't think I had my camera more than six or
eight months. My girlfriend (a Nikon shooter for those who care) and I
would wander around The City looking for interesting situations. One day
we came across a group of about seven or eight guys hanging out on a street
In a message dated 1/21/2005 6:55:15 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Really nice, Marnie.
The BW rendition really suits the subject
Wendy
===
Thanks.
Normally, I am a color gal. But this seemed a BW thing. Shows the wrinkles
better. :-)
Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 1/21/2005 8:30:08 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Great idea.
My reaction to this is that I would take it in a portrait orientation, to
acentuate the proportions of the hands eliminat the extraneous upper LH
corner
include the finger tips from both
I have for sale the FA 28-105 F4-5.6 (58mm thread) zoom lens. It is in
EX+ condition. This is the Power Zoom version that Pentax made. Its a
nice lens and takes great photos. I'm selling it since it has become
redundant. I have other lenses now with those focal lengths. It will
come with the caps.
I would have thought Greenpeace...
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Albano Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 18. januar 2005 16:16
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Pins (was: Re: Do you have one of these?)
The
Hi Shel,
It's looking quite good, but it lacks any strong blacks (at least on my
monitor). However, I don't think it would benefit from more contrast as the
highlights are about right. I'd go into curves and pull the bottom end until
the blacks are stronger. I might also try converting to rgb
Looks a lot better in BW ... this RGB version looses the beauty of Scala.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 1/21/2005 8:25:40 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Making Espresso (was: Re: OT-Coffee Theory)
Lovely!
Gianfranco Irlanda
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:30:00AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, if you *will* use web browsers as mail clients ...
Agreed. I have to set the one at work to accept html mail, as many of the
dipsticks who are supposed to be running the
I'm a little out of my element here, but...
With a scene of black folk, do you think it's good to add black to
black, just to get some deeper shadows, more contrast?
It seems to be a touchy situation, and much manipulation of the
black/white mix of shades might lose the gentle contrast of the
For B W, the MX.
Super-A has TTL but I don't like the speed buttons and the general look.
MX's best point is that it offers nice control up to a half-stop with
its orange light. Great viewfinder also.
Andre
Excellent!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.2 - Release Date: 1/21/2005
Hi Paul ...
Never saw your post, just a reference from Keith's post.
There are some deep blacks in the image, but not many. I didn't want to
fiddle with contrast and tonality too much until the resto work was done,
but you're right, there are some areas in which there can be a little more
Hi Keith,
Paul's right in that there can be a little more depth in some areas. See
my note to him if you care to look. There are ways to add depth without
compromising the skin tones.
I'm interested in your comment below. Why wouldn't you have made the
photo?
Shel
[Original Message]
I knew Cotty was a product of the English school system but you William?
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Cotty
Subject: Re: A* 200/2.8 Value
Guilty as charged, punishment: 10 lashes. No, make that 20. Please.
You REALLY must meet my wife.
William Robb
witty sig file
You
The skin tones here are all medium gray. If you selectively adjust contrast
with curves or add black to black with selective color, you won't affect the
skin tones.
Paul
I'm a little out of my element here, but...
With a scene of black folk, do you think it's good to add black to
black,
On 21/1/05, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I knew Cotty was a product of the English school system but you William?
Au contraire mon frere, the vast majority of my schooling was in
California :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
In a message dated 1/21/2005 10:10:48 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Excellent!
graywolf
==
I think you just made my day. :-)
Marnie aka Doe
Paul, They're far from medium grey here. A lot closer to Zone 4
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The skin tones here are all medium gray.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Keith,
Paul's right in that there can be a little more depth in some areas. See
my note to him if you care to look. There are ways to add depth without
compromising the skin tones.
That's interesting. Seems to me, fussin' around with the dark end of the
scale, with a
Hi Keith,
There are many ways to adjust the shadows without making the faces or other
areas darker.
As for your comments about making the photo, well, the situation wasn't
quite like my approaching them and asking for and taking a pic. My GF and
I were there for a while, talking, chatting,
I replied to Keith from memory, but I took another look now. On my monitor they
vary between zone 4 and 5. The slats in the fence behind them are close to zone
5. Medium gray is an ambiguous term. But I'd describe zone 5 as medium gray.
However, I am running at gamma 1.8, which I mentioned in
Oh my God, that's worse...
Cotty wrote:
On 21/1/05, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I knew Cotty was a product of the English school system but you William?
Au contraire mon frere, the vast majority of my schooling was in
California :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Hi Shel,
Something just occured to me. I'm looking at this shot at work on a crap
Viewsonic monitor. I sometimes forget that. I've opened my photos here at times
and felt the urge to change something. I always have to remind myself that what
I see here may not be real. I'll look again when I
In a message dated 1/21/2005 6:14:02 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
while it's a very nice picture, there's something distracting to me -
perhaps this triangular white area in the upper right corner. I've
slightly modified your picture (sorry if you dislike it). See
In a message dated 1/21/2005 8:30:08 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Great idea.
My reaction to this is that I would take it in a portrait orientation, to
acentuate the proportions of the hands eliminat the extraneous upper LH
corner
include the finger tips from both
In a message dated 1/21/2005 6:55:15 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Really nice, Marnie.
The BW rendition really suits the subject
Wendy
===
Thanks.
Normally, I am a color gal. But this seemed a BW thing. Shows the wrinkles
better. :-)
Marnie aka Doe (Resent.)
In a message dated 1/21/2005 10:13:55 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are some deep blacks in the image, but not many. I didn't want to
fiddle with contrast and tonality too much until the resto work was done,
but you're right, there are some areas in which there can be
Hi,
Like I said, people are people, and we were just being human.
Well said. Nice photo - made by the guy who's standing.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Marnie,
I agree with Ken and would like to see all the fingers and finger tips.
Then I thought about her face...
Why can't we see her face? Why the cliche of the hands?
I guess that I'd like to see her wrinkles and all.
Maybe you could get a twinkle in her eye,
or a dour expression or whatever.
All excellent points and well told.
You're right, of course.
I'll re-read that and take it to heart.
keith
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Keith,
There are many ways to adjust the shadows without making the faces or other
areas darker.
As for your comments about making the photo, well, the situation
A bit late, but I'm jumping on the same bandwagon as these guys- great shot
and a unique perspective.
Keep it up and hope to see the rest sometime.
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 2:09 PM
Here is some very disturbing news, at least from my point of view:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4194963.stm
Can you shed any light on this, Jostein?
Hi Jens,
I noticed the same thing actually, especially with skin tones. At first I
thought it was black and white points which needed adjusting, but I couldn't
seem to duplicate film quality black and white with the ist D.
Here were some ist D samples (shot in colour, then greyscaled, then black
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A final thought: I posted this photo because I was looking
though
some old contacts (from the summer), looking for another
shot, and
noticed this one which seems to have escaped my eye the
first time.
That's why I love contacts. I don't know that I'd do
It's funny how many digital BW photographs have this metal
greyish - or
silver greyish apperance!
I noticed the same thing actually, especially with skin tones.
At first I
thought it was black and white points which needed adjusting,
but I couldn't
seem to duplicate film quality black
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: A* 200/2.8 Value
I knew Cotty was a product of the English school system but you
William?
English wife.
William Robb
In a message dated 1/21/2005 1:24:23 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
I agree with Ken and would like to see all the fingers and finger tips.
Then I thought about her face...
Why can't we see her face? Why the cliche of the hands?
I guess that I'd like to see her
In a message dated 1/21/2005 6:55:15 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Really nice, Marnie.
The BW rendition really suits the subject
Wendy
===
Thanks.
Normally, I am a color gal. But this seemed a BW thing. Shows the wrinkles
better. :-)
Marnie aka Doe
Thanks for the tips Godfrey- much appreciated!
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: Mom at 90
It's funny how many digital BW photographs have this metal
Very nice, Gianfranco. Good example of how interesting pictures can be
made out of mundane everyday objects and situations.
j
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:17:16 -0800 (PST), Gianfranco Irlanda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just this past weekend I bought a Bialetti
Oh, but doing that would require thought. I got the
first few then decided i wasn't going to go through
all that. Such a spoil-sport I am.
/me goes back to sugar wafers and coffee
--- Tim Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been a slow day on the list, hopefully everyone
is out
I would have _loved_ to have seen more images, of other times...
Your feel of what's important is well felt and portrayed!
I'd love to have been a fly on the wall, as it's said... to hear what
was being talked about. If I understood Norwegian?
All of which makes it such a very interisting photo!
G'day Keith.
Thanks Mate.
I can feel the love :-)
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2005 11:22 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: She's alive!!
Trevor is sorta kinda cute, isn't he?
Uh huh.
Just
Thanks Keith. It was the only time I ever had a chance to see the place where
my father came from. I was there for just two days on the tail end of a
business trip. Both of these men are long since gone. By the way, they were
speaking Swedish.
Paul
I would have _loved_ to have seen more
On 21/1/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
No, but if he did, we would surely make fun of it!!
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare5.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Nice remembrance, Paul. Interesting and likeable photo, just the kind that
makes me want to see more - other shots of the house, the area, other
people, people engaged in different activities.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I shot this in Sweden 25 years ago with a Fuji
I shot this in Sweden 25 years ago with a Fuji 801 and a Vivitar 20/3.5 lens.
(Wish I had a better wide angle at that time.) The two men in the photo are my
uncle Olle and my great uncle Einar. This was the first time I met them. The
location is the kitchen of the farmhouse where my father was
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:43:30 +1000, Fairy Gal wrote:
Here is our route for the first few days, which includes South Grafton on
Day 2 - anywhere near you?
Tanja,
You will have to supply the rest of the schedule for those of us around
the rest of the country who would like to say hi. Sydney,
It's been a slow day on the list, hopefully everyone is out engaging in
creative pursuits. I thought I'd post a puzzler I ran across recently:
Figure out the names of candy from clues. Those of you not in the states may
find it a bit more challenging, but probably fun anyway.
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:11:01 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty has a hairpiece
No, but if he did, we would surely make fun of it!!
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:56:36 +0100, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this one discussion you guys ought to zip up quickily?
But not too quickly, I guess...
Jostein
That was a bad one, Jostein! ROTFLMAO!!
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 06:17:16 -0800 (PST), Gianfranco Irlanda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I jump into the matter just to add something photographic, hope
you'll enjoy it:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3054083
Tech. data: LX, 50/1.4, Agfa Scala.
Ciao,
Gianfranco
Lovely
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
