Shel Belinkoff a écrit :
Have you noticed any differences between the DS and the DS2 in terms of
speed or function? Is the larger screen on the back a substantial
improvement?
A sad thing about this larger screen is that they only changed its size,
not its resolution. That is, the screen
Hi Sunny,
Nice and beatiful photography. Thanks for sharing.
Ronald
Sunny Chung wrote:
Hey everyone thank you for all your quick and extremely informative
responses. Just wanted to introduce myself a little more
I've only just began to work with DSLR's and I'm a poor college
student
David Mann wrote:
I think it's very well balanced as they do spend a lot of
time reviewing more realistic stuff.
A small fraction of what the programme many years ago set out to do; then it
was about cars the average motorist was likely to buy and a few commercial
vehicle motorcycle tests
On 13/12/05, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
Probably old news to some of you. I just heard of it. No not the Grand
Canyon itself.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0826_050826_grandcanyon.html
Excellent!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Tom C wrote:
the old Vuescan I have. It's been probably 6 months since I've made a
scan but if I remember correctly the new Minolta software includes some
of the mutipass scan abilities now. I still haven't used the new Vuescan
yes, up to 16x.
I've tried Vuescan once and I did like its
On 12/14/05, Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, apart from this bigger screen, the only hardware difference with
the DS, that could not be reflected in the firmware upgrade 2.00, is the
retractable autofocus coupling, for manual AF retouching. IMHO, this one
is a much
David Mann wrote:
The testing I've done with the driver for my Multi Pro indicates that
most adjustments are best left for Photoshop. The only driver control
I set these days is exposure, and I have to be extremely careful to
avoid clipping the highlights. I also use 4x oversampling and
HJmm,
I'm obviously not up to date with acroread. Thanks for the information.
Cheers,
Ronald
John Francis wrote:
The last couple of versions of Acrobat (6.0 7.0, I believe)
have support for forms with areas that can be filled in by
the user. It's also possible to re-save the form with
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/12/14 Wed AM 05:06:57 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Top Notc^H^H^H^HGear [Was: Re: OT: For Roberts, Brewer and
others
On Dec 13, 2005, at 11:26 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Almost any car programme will be successful.
I
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Don Sanderson wrote:
Hi Bill, the only reason the 40 is in the running is that I
already have the K35/2, K35/3.5 and A35/2.8.
I'll feel a little guilty buying another 35 with the 2
excellent K's on the shelf. I've heard so many good things
about the FA35/2 though.
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I'd sell the older lenses and buy an FA35/2. It's a better lens in my
opinion.
Have you used the Ks? Or are you comparing with the 40 in the above?
Kostas
p.s.: I believe Tom was positively commenting on the straightness of
your answer (which is
Fred wrote:
Does anyone know anything about this lens? Its a manual focus Sigma XQ
200mm/f3.5 on an interchangeable lens mount.
The focusing mechanism is interesting. It has a quick focusing ring, and
a second, fine focusing ring that gets it into the macro mode,
although I think it
Yes, that's an excellent shot. In al fairness, I must say that while
the FA 35/2 is a superb lens, this shot and other tests suggest that
the DA 40 is an excellent performer as well. I have yet to see a DA
series lens that was any less than excellent. In truth, even the M40 is
much better than
2 years ago I decided to acquire the FA35/2. Both for
its good reputationd and also preparing for digital.
Now that I have recently acquired a Ds, I think that
this was a good decision. I have been using the lens a
lot for candid shots (mainly friend's kids) with
available light and I find it more
Hi Sunny,
Welcome to the Pentax forum. I enjoyed our portfolio. Some very good
work. You have an excellent eye.
Paul
On Dec 14, 2005, at 1:07 AM, Sunny Chung wrote:
Hey everyone thank you for all your quick and extremely informative
responses. Just wanted to introduce myself a little
Some beautiful work Sunny.
You've proven once again that it's more the eye behind the
lens than the lens itself that counts.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Sunny Chung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 12:07 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Amature
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Funny enough, some time after the FA35 purchase, I
sold my K35/3.5 to Kostas, and I am glad to hear that
he finds it as good as I did.
Pleasure, little treasure. Unlike your AF500FTZ, which is pleasure,
giant treasure :-)
Kostas
p.s.: Still can't
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7572750740
I now have 2 on the way, eventually I'll get another really good one. ;-)
I've always wanted to buy something from this guy, he has some
excellent deals if one can stand buying sight unseen.
Even with his 3053/99.9% rating that's hard
I could probably part with the K35/2 but I think the K35/3.5
will be buried with me. ;-)
Little Gem is an apt description.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 4:31 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE:
G'day Don.
Mate, I've bought from him before and he is a top seller.
I picked up a SMC-F 35-135 Af from him.
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor
Grafton, Australia
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2005 11:31 PM
To: PDML
Subject: Couldn't
Thanks Trevor.
What do you think of the 35-135?
I've bid on a few but wouldn't go very high, there aren't many
comments out there on this lens.
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 6:49 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
On 12/13/05, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2451.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
It's another Dayton signature piece.
Brilliant, Bruce!
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who's using their Pentax gear to make a buck or two, what gear are you
using, are you using film or digital or both, and what kind of jobs are
you doing?
Though I'm a full-time student for one more semester, my only job is
photography these days. I did a
Quoting keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Okay then. If that's how you define it, that makes sense.
However, let's do the numbers. If that bug that Davuid Mann showed in
his image was indeed 1/2 mm long, how large was the original image?!
The bug, as shown on my monitor, measures about 2.5 cm
Is there a public reason why they close it?
Jostein
Quoting Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just been informed of the sad decision to close the Pentax Benelux
branch and the relevant repair lab next April. That lab in Breda is the most
renowned Pentax service, the only one capable
Do you happen to have a photo of the lens, Derby? (Thanks.)
This is the ebay listing... http://tinyurl.com/blnpt
Thanks, Derby. That's interesting looking. I've never seen one of 'em
before, and I was just curious.
I have to say, I'm a bit intrigued with this lens. It is definitely
Hi Ann,
Saw the other replies and know you turned it down. Good thing you did. As Bob
says, they make money on the entrance fee.
A google search brought up a series of user experiences from people who have
been fooled. Apparently they don't deliver according to promise.
For example:
$39.00 You Pirate!
Don Sanderson wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7572750740
I now have 2 on the way, eventually I'll get another really good one. ;-)
I've always wanted to buy something from this guy, he has some
excellent deals if one can stand buying sight
Mark,
You mention that you had considered a Quantum power pack for your Sigma flash.
Is there a power in' connecter on the Sigma? Does Quantum make a connector? I
own both the Sigma and a Quantum Battery II, but I never saw anything on Sigma
that suggested an external power source could be
I haven't seen official information about that. However, it is widely
believed it is for Pentax world cost cut policy.
I've also heard rumors of job cuts at Pentax Germany/Europe, but cannot
confirm that.
In Italy, those 8 folks working for Pentax in Florence sales dept. for years
are no longer
Shel Dave -
I've not noticed a major difference between the two in either speed or
function and if there is a difference in battery life with the larger
screen it hasn't been bad enough to slap me in the face (at least at
this point). The larger screen is nice, and is somewhat easier on my
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 8:47 PM
Subject: Grand Canyon
Probably old news to some of you. I just heard of it. No not the Grand
Canyon itself.
Paul,
What speed(s) are the SD cards that you're using?
Godfrey thought that the DS2 could take advantage of cards with speeds of
up to 133X or so, iirc. IAC, if you're using slower cards, you might not
notice any write speed difference.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Sorenson
Shel
Sonny, lovely stuff! You've made some wonderful images there.
About the lens, I know everyone raves about the 50/1.4 primes (with
reason), but I got the FA 50mm/1.7 for two reasons: it weighs two
ounces less than the 1.4 (minimizing weight is important to me), and
I only paid about $90 for
That is very cool. I'd love to see it and walk out on it. Glad to know
it's not at the Grand canyon, though. That would be a disaster.
Shel
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0826_050826_grandcanyon.html
- Original Message -
From: Ronald Arvidsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 2:50 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - not a skimmer
Hi Christian,
Do you have any picutre of the ballhead-frying pan pod? How did you mount
the ballhead to the frying
Where have you been the last 40 years or so, Paul? Quantum's power packs
usually use a dummy battery pack with a cord to connect. Often require a
hole to be drilled or notched into the battery door of the flash as
well, which I never much liked.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot
Thanks for the ifno Christian. I'll make one myself.
Cheers,
Ronald
Christian wrote:
- Original Message - From: Ronald Arvidsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 2:50 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - not a skimmer
Hi Christian,
Do you have
Shel,
You're right in your premise that I'm not using high speed cards. For
what I do, the inexpensive (read that cheap ;0) cards have a sufficient
write speed. With faster cards the buffer will clear a little faster so
if one is shooting lots of continuous action there would be an
Well, I've quickly discovered that its very hard to find pentax lenses.
I would like to buy the 50mm FA/1.4, but besides bhphotovideo.com and
1 single hit on ebay, I don't know where else to look. It seems like
either because of
marketing or just number of users, pentax lenses are a lot harder to
Try KEH.com
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Sunny Chung
I was wondering if there's another website I don't know about that
everyone else here gets
their lenses from. I can't afford a new one so perhaps a place that I
can trust buying used ones (maybe even one of you?).
The Pentax AT 400 has a power connection for external power supplies. Quantum
makes a cord that plugs right into it. That's the only relatively recent unit
with which I'm familiar. My thirty-five year old Honeywell potato masher
strobes also had connections for external power. I've never
Pentax USA also went thru a reduction in employees this fall. Bob S.
On 12/14/05, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen official information about that. However, it is widely
believed it is for Pentax world cost cut policy.
I've also heard rumors of job cuts at Pentax
Just after the *istDS came out, there seemed to be a HUGE run on
Pentax lenses on the used market.
They were quite common before, and quite rare after.
I find myself wishing that I'd picked up a few choice lenses (Tokina
100-300/4, A28/2.8) before people started buying them all up.
-Mat
On
Hi Kostas,
You are correct. I was amused at Godfrey's reply because it was devoid of
ambiguity.
Tom C.
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Help me decide, DA40 or FA35???
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:32:56
Friday for sale (a little premature, but...)
Vosonic X's-Drive (Harddrive/Card Reader/MP3 player) with 40GB harddrive.
Like new with all acceccories included.
Asking price: 150 USD.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
The gold colored leaf grabbed my attention. So I was trying to show
the leaf much how I saw it - a standout in a crowd. It needed the
context around it to be more than just a picture of a leaf.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, December 13, 2005, 9:16:21 PM, you wrote:
BL Hi!
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4,
On Dec 14, 2005, at 2:32 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I'd sell the older lenses and buy an FA35/2. It's a better lens in
my opinion.
Have you used the Ks? Or are you comparing with the 40 in the above?
I tried a K35/3.5 for a couple of days (seemed good, but I didn't buy
it) and own
Many thanks, Frank.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, December 14, 2005, 5:10:20 AM, you wrote:
ft On 12/13/05, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_2451.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
ft It's another
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Ann, all I could say is wow!... And I thought you were more of a
street/people shooter... Man, I was wrong!
Boris
Well I kinda do both - it is just what ever is in
front of the camera that
I want to look at again... it may not seem that
way, but most of these
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friday for sale (a little premature, but...)
Oh, I love Fridays. How much do you ask for it?
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
You mention that you had considered a Quantum power pack for your Sigma flash.
Is there a power in' connecter on the Sigma? Does Quantum make a connector? I
own both the Sigma and a Quantum Battery II, but I never saw anything on Sigma
that suggested a
n external
Hi!
Got today my LaCrosse BC-900 intelligent battery charger. Now I have 5
sets of batteries for my camera - 2 * 2300 mAh and 3 * 2000 mAh...
The charger is charging the batteries as I write this message ;-).
My thanks goes to Rob Studdert who made me think and eventually enable
myself with
A!
Don
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 8:42 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Couldn't resist.
$39.00 You Pirate!
Don Sanderson wrote:
Thanks, but I think I'm out of luck. My Quantum Battery 2 is a 9 volt unit. I
use it with the AF400T. The Sigma would require the 6 volt Battery 1 or one of
Quantum's other 6 volt power packs. I guess I'll keep swapping those nimh
batteries in and out.
Paul
-- Original message
This was taken a few days ago at a family portrait session. I usually
shoot each of the children individually along with the family.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, AF360FGZ on Stroboframe bracket
ISO 400, 1/90 sec @ f/4.5, Manual Mode, Center weighted metering
-1.5 stops flash compensation, shading
Looks really flat and of quite low contrast on my semi-calibrated screen.
Can you explain a bit about flash compensation? Why did you chose -1.5
stops? Why would you chose any compensation? I know virtually nothing
about flash ...
Shel
...
[Original Message]
From: Bruce
Very good portefoleo.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Sunny Chung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14. desember 2005 07:07
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/13/2005 7:58:22 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm... :-) I realize it may not be the right aesthetic, but I would quite
like to stand on it and look down through it if it's built.
Tom C.
=
Count me out.
Hi Boris,
I used mine to fix several sets of old
NiCad AAs that I thought were absolutely
finished. I'm using them in the flashes
and they are holding up like they were
new. The La Crosse (not available in
Finland) is a very smart device.
Don
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Got today my
Hello Shel,
You've mentioned flatness/low contrast before. I have viewed it on
two calibrated monitors - one CRT and one LCD and it seems fine to me.
I'll be interested to hear what others think. Could be your monitor
or mine or just an individual preference. Hopefully others will give
their
Very nice. Good use of fill. You generated some catchlights and hair detail
without overlighting. The contrast level is subtle but well suited to this type
of portrait, IMO.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This was taken a few
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
(of her subjects)
it is just what ever is in
front of the camera that
I want to look at again...
This is going in my quote file.
One of the detail pics from my bedroom shoot. Two monolights. Fill at minus one
stop. FA 50/1.4 on the *istD f10 @ 1/60
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3950383
Hi list.
A friend of mine wants a flat screen / computer monitor for photo editing.
Which kind are considered adequate for this purpose, please.
I think Rob wrote about this once, but I can't seem to find that mail...
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Very nice, Paul, but...what's holding the vase to the
wall?
Rick
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the detail pics from my bedroom shoot. Two
monolights. Fill at minus one stop. FA 50/1.4 on the
*istD f10 @ 1/60
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3950383
Hi Bruce;
My first reaction was very beautiful; great tones and lighting then I
read Shel's comment
I don't think it's flat or too low contrast. I really like it!
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday,
Paul;
to be honest I don't like the color of the wall It's kinda nit-picky
but to me it distracts from the image as a whole. Also, the feeling of
looking up at the vase is uncomfortable
I do like the composition, the arrangement of the flowers and the colors:
bright green, subtle
Hi Jens,
I'm not Rob, so I will just put forward a personal recommendation.
I have a LaCie 20 flat panel that I'm happy with. It was about 30%
cheaper than the alternatives from Apple and Eizo, and the colours
have been very stable.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
A relaxed portrait of a relaxed moment. Well balanced, the lines works
together... I like it.
Shel says it is flat. I don't.
I find it subtle but rich, and this is not the first time.
This makes me wonder. Is it a matter of different tastes or different
monitors? To be honest, I have no idea.
On Dec 14, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
A relaxed portrait of a relaxed moment. Well balanced, the lines works
together... I like it.
Shel says it is flat. I don't.
I find it subtle but rich, and this is not the first time.
This makes me wonder. Is it a matter of different tastes or
On Dec 14, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Jostein wrote:
Hi Jens,
I'm not Rob, so I will just put forward a personal recommendation.
I have a LaCie 20 flat panel that I'm happy with. It was about 30%
cheaper than the alternatives from Apple and Eizo, and the colours
have been very stable.
Actually,
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 3:06 PM
Subject: OT: Which Flat Screen
Hi list.
A friend of mine wants a flat screen / computer monitor for photo editing.
Which kind are considered adequate for
Hi,
I may change my opinion later. I realized that I was wearing a white shirt,
and getting more than the usual amount of reflected light on the screen
even though the shades in the office were drawn. Now is not a good time
for me to review the photo because the sun streaming into the office is
There are flat screen CRT monitors and, of course, flat screen LCD/Plasma
monitors. Which does your friend desire?
Shel
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A friend of mine wants a flat screen / computer monitor for photo editing.
Which kind are considered
I'm not mad or upset, I just couldn't make out what he was suggesting or
to whom. ;-)
Godfrey
Ironic, is it not, that my attempt at humorously acknowledging the lack of
ambiguity in your words, was itself apparently, ambiguous. :-)
Tom C.
I'm not as bad as you.
6 big guys and some strong tranquilisers
and they might get me out there.
If they could stand the screaming. ;-(
Don (8 feet up is my limit.)
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 1:10 PM
To:
I use the Apple Cinema Display 20 and find it to be an exceptional
performer. Calibrates easily, is extremely stable, very solid
resolution and high quality color fidelity.
Godfrey
On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:06 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
A friend of mine wants a flat screen / computer monitor for
The testing I've done with the driver for my Multi Pro indicates
that most adjustments are best left for Photoshop. The only
driver control I set these days is exposure, and I have to be
extremely careful to avoid clipping the highlights.
I agree with that. In general, what I try to do
On Dec 14, 2005, at 2:15 PM, Tom C wrote:
I'm not mad or upset, I just couldn't make out what he was
suggesting or to whom. ;-)
Ironic, is it not, that my attempt at humorously acknowledging the
lack of ambiguity in your words, was itself apparently, ambiguous. :-)
lol ... ain't it the
I feel the quiet subdued light. Flat, in this case is restful and
suits a melancholy scene.
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
A relaxed portrait of a relaxed moment. Well balanced, the lines
works
together... I like it.
Shel
I'm aware that aggressive agitation increases contrast
substantially but have never heard/considered/noticed
it having a pronounced effect on grain size.
Could you elaborate a bit on this?
Don
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Don't forget and a bit of talant honed by years of experience to go
with it.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
(of her subjects)
it is just what ever is in
front of the camera
My first thought when I saw this was 'content'.
(As in: Comfort and a feeling of satisfaction.)
Nicely done Bruce.
I need to use the A70-210 more.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 12:52 PM
To:
Hi Jens,
I recently bought a ViewSonic VP191b. It's a highly recommended LCD. You can
see in the link a test with several 19'' lcd''s. And it has a fair price here
in Portugal of about 550€.
http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/06/06/finding_the_best_19/
Best regards,
Manuel
-Mensagem
A neat image Paul, I like it. Almost an abstract.
A minor nit is the glare off the vase.
My thought is using polarized light with a polarizer on the lens to dial out
the glare. Never tried this, have you?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO:
I've recently been using a 17 flat screen from Dell. Not the monitor I
wanted, but it seems to be doing the job. I have no complaints with it.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Which Flat Screen
Hi list.
A friend of mine wants a
I did most of my film experimentation in the past decade or so with
subminiature formats (Minox 8x11mm) becaust these tiny format
negatives show effects of processing much more clearly than working
with something even as large as 35mm, in comparative terms.
Lots of experiments and precise
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/whatever.pdf
Quote File, Schmote File!
It's going on my wall!! ;-)
(Thanx Ann)
Don
-Original Message-
From: E.R.N. Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 1:51 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GESO or PESO - the
That's interesting, I never thought about it that way.
It's the same 'local exhaustion' of the developer that
will hold contrast down and prevent blocked highlights.
Cool! Kinda Zone system meets Minox. ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
graywolf wrote:
Don't forget and a bit of talant honed by years of experience to go
with it.
Yes -- that would be a comment on her results. I read it as a comment on
her choice of subject, though.
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
(of her subjects)
it is just what ever is
I know there is no such thing as a correct tonal range. I used the word
very deliberate to draw attention to the fact that we often comment out of
personal preferences, not out of one objective standard.
I think overall I prefer BW photos with a little more
contrast than Bruce, although, for
I feel confident that no PDMLer will feel cheated if I post this auction:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7572507947
So, if any of you folks are in the market for a color film camera,
here's your chance. Let us know how many rolls of film come with the
camera, too.
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
(of her subjects)
it is just what ever is in
front of the camera that
I want to look at again...
This is going in my quote file.
LOL!
finally _I said something quoteable! :)
ann
Don Sanderson wrote:
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/whatever.pdf
Quote File, Schmote File!
It's going on my wall!! ;-)
(Thanx Ann)
Don
The pictures? or the quote? ;)
a
-Original Message-
From: E.R.N. Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005
Something happened to my last post. Some formatting that made it a bit hard
to read. This is how it should be:
I know there is no such thing as a correct tonal range. I used the word
very deliberate to draw attention to the fact that we often comment out of
personal preferences, not out of one
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
graywolf wrote:
Don't forget and a bit of talant honed by years of experience to go
with it.
Yes -- that would be a comment on her results. I read it as a comment on
her choice of subject, though.
you read it right..
And, hey, I can say what _he_ said about
Don Sanderson wrote:
I'm not as bad as you.
6 big guys and some strong tranquilisers
and they might get me out there.
If they could stand the screaming. ;-(
Don (8 feet up is my limit.)
I cound stand a few feet back from the edge of a
cliff or mountainside,
and, with some trepedation,
Same error again. Bare with me, I'm to tired to correct it.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL
Well, hows about I put the Quote on my wall,
and order a CD??
Don
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 6:37 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GESO or PESO - the calendar is done - phew!
Don Sanderson
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
