... I think "hotshot" is about four levels higher than I am ...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Have a go at it, Marnie ;-))
>
> Shel
>
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/3women-23.html
>
> > You mig
Hi,
It loks certainly very artistic. I'd never thought of sand dunes if you
hadn't mentioned it. How on Earth did you get that color? Was it
reflected light or a photoshop job?
I think its a nice piece of artistic graphics (photos can be that way
sometimes) but as a desert picture? I don't k
Pawel Bartuzi wrote:
Ronald Arvidsson wrote:
aggresively one uses the skis. When doing photos of downhill skiing -
use fast shutterspeed as skiers move quite fast.
I know it depends on actual shooting conditions (focal length, skiers
speed etc.) but that is exactly what I will try to avoi
I thought Ken Rockwell's site was devoted to Ken Rockwell.
John
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 05:51:21 -, Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
not to mention
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/nikkor.htm :)
mishka
On 1/2/06, Jostein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not exactly equvialent, but lots of info n
Yea, I was gone. But as mostly a lurker I guess it wasn't noticed. :)
Ursprungligt meddelande
Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Jan 2, 2006 8:03:09 PM
Till: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Ärende: Re: Back online
You were gone? :-P
Paulus Eriksson wrote:
> Hi all
>
> After some computer problems
Sorry list for posting two PESOs within less than a week.
I'm going through some raw files from the summer, and found this.
Different from what I usually do, even though I didn't intend it to
be.
http://flickr.com/photos/jbuhler/81374033/
I don't think it works in black and white. But I like it
I spent more than an hour looking at Rockwell's
site. I don't know what to make of it.
Don
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Don't miss this:
http://tinyurl.com/azk9a
Very best wishes from me, too.
John
Same here John. Happy New Year.
I had a look at Ken
Scott Loveless wrote:
So I got this Holga color flash camera for Christmas. Took it to a
family Christmas party and shot two rolls of TMAX 100 with the flash
on. The first roll was processed at iso 100 in Ilfosol S. Way
underexposed. The second roll I pushed to 400 in HC-110 dilution B.
It
Hi All,
Has anybody used iPhoto Book printing service or any other similar service?
I was considering using iPhoto Book service for printing out
a wedding photo-album for my sister-in-law, - an album that includes
variety of pictures quckly arranged together digitally (instead of
printing out p
Oly Stylus Epic worked fine for me. Tiny to fit in a pocket, pretty
robust, and cheap
enough notto worry too much about it. Sharp 35mm lens too.
best,
mishka
On 12/31/05, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...wise or foolish? Discuss.
>
> I'm going skiing for the first time at the end of February
That seems like poor due diligence on the paper's part. It happens
sometimes but congrats and do save it as a tearsheet.
--jc
On Dec 31, 2005, at 10:07 PM, Ryan Lee wrote:
Thanks everyone! Yes, unfortunately there weren't any credits. I can
understand there not being a credit for the shot,
not to mention
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/nikkor.htm :)
mishka
On 1/2/06, Jostein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not exactly equvialent, but lots of info nonetheless:
> Bjørn Rørslett's website:
> www.naturfotograf.com
>
> Jostein
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Igor Roshchin" <[EMA
It all boils down to how paranoid one wants to be.
The stuff that *really matters* gets (in addition) uploaded to a
server abroad (but, unfortunately the storage there is limited to 15
or so GB).
I have a number of CDs and DVDs that I burned a while ago, which have
corrupted files now.
I wouldn't
I just thought I would post a few shots from an afternoon out around my
town with my dog Mackie over the holidays. She's in a couple of the
shots, of course. For anyone interested. All but the deer shot was
taken with the K35 f 3.5. The deer was taken with a Tokina 80-200 F2.8.
Comments welcom
Let's think in practical terms, ok?
Between 93% and 97% coverage viewfinder with 35mm format, the
difference amounts to somewhere around 1.5mm more format coverage on
the long axis, less than that on the short axis. If you can really
see that and find it significant in hand-held field photo
Suprisingly, mine doesn't seem to have any light leaks..yet.
On 1/2/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I considered one (gotta love 'two people and a midget' focusing), but I
> scored a TLR off eBay for less than a Holga, and it lacks light leaks
> too. doesn't have the 'toy camera' l
Thanks, Paul.
On 1/2/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool. Some nice shots here. I especially like the pic of Steve.
> Paul
> On Jan 2, 2006, at 9:47 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
>
> > So I got this Holga color flash camera for Christmas. Took it to a
> > family Christmas party and s
I considered one (gotta love 'two people and a midget' focusing), but I
scored a TLR off eBay for less than a Holga, and it lacks light leaks
too. doesn't have the 'toy camera' look, but my Box Camera helps for that.
-Adam
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 1/2/06, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's pretty much it. I even shoot with the A/M switch set to M on the
Spotty. And since it's sorta-AE with auto aperture vs. continuous AE
with no auto aperture, I'm happy to chose the latter.
-Adam
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
So in essence your saying you value AE more that Auto aperture
func
brighter is not automatically better in a vf.
sometimes contrast, ground glass roughness, magnification,
etc. are compromised to achieve greater brightness
and while they may allow for easier composition,
they are not necessisarily easier to manually focus for
the reasons stated.
jco
-Orig
Godfrey, the Nikon FM has 93% coverage and .86x magnification, which is
distinctly inferior to the MX's 97% coverage and .95x magnification
(which is actually more coverage and as much or more magnification than
any non-F body from Nikon, the closest for coverage being the F100 at
96% [albeit .
So in essence your saying you value AE more that Auto aperture
function. That's a tough call. I really don't know if I would
rather have stop-down AE or GB hypermanual but retaining auto aperture
which the GB function and K/M lenses give you. I honesty think
GB with auto aperture would be my prefer
Note the FM3a screens are even better than the FM2/FE2 screens.
-Adam
Don Sanderson wrote:
Hi Godfrey and Happy New Year.
I like the idea of the FM ring on an FE2!
I'd simply scavenge it off the FM I have.
And thanks for all the other comments and suggestions in your
previous posts.
Don
> If Pentax is trying to move on from supporting obsolete lenses, or if
> they're trying to force me to upgrade to newer lenses, they have
> succeeded only in encouraging me to buy even older lenses.
Har !!!
Fred
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 2 Jan 2006 at 20:21, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
that's interesting, your in complete opposition to the "green button"
apologists who insist it's easy and not a big deal. What I want
is a higher model that supports all kmount lenses fully.
That would be nice feature, espec
Flipping the auto/manual switch, pressing the green button, six of one
Compared to using K/M lenses on the *ist (once again, film body), the
M42s are heaven. If the *ist had an aperture simulator or something
similar to the green button I'd definitely use the non-A lenses. Fact
is, "disc
I do actually focus often with the lens stopped down. As I tend to shoot
at f5.6 and wider, this isn't a huge deal. If I need to stop down more,
I usually discover that after focusing.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
But don't you still have to switch to auto to open the aperture for
focusing?
> oh and apparently one can auto-focus.
Fred
On 2 Jan 2006 at 21:32, William Robb wrote:
> I did a locking adaptor on my 17mm Fishy Tak.
> I don't know if all the Taks are built thusly, but I took the lock spring
> off an adaptor, then used the screw to lock the adaptor to the lens, marked
> the back of the lens where the lock pin would be
On 2 Jan 2006 at 21:19, Fred wrote:
> So, I prefer to think of the A* 85/1.4 and the FA 77/1.8 Limited as being
> sibling lenses, two peas out of the same pod, just one of which (the baby
> brother) happens to also have autofocus capability. That is to say that
> the 77/1.8 is not the replacement
One could always leave the M42 lens on "manual"
mode, and just rotate the aperture ring open to
focus and then closed to shoot. anywhere in between
would still give correct exposure. Still kludgy
in my mind but would be OK for rarely used lenses
not worth buying in the "A" mount all over again
But don't you still have to switch to auto to open the aperture for
focusing? You certainly don't try to focus with the lens stopped down??
I don't see what's easy about using the screwmount lenses.
Paul
On Jan 2, 2006, at 10:24 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Glen wrote:
At 02:48 PM 1/2/2006, Paul Ste
On 2 Jan 2006 at 20:21, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> that's interesting, your in complete opposition to the "green button"
> apologists who insist it's easy and not a big deal. What I want
> is a higher model that supports all kmount lenses fully.
> That would be nice feature, especially when you cons
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert"
Subject: Re: M42 lenses on *ist bodies, or, I'm an idiot
If you wished to fix a screw adaptor on each of your screw lenses you'd
need to
remove the adaptor locking flange and fabricate a locking pin hole on each
lens
assembly that mimics
So you like hyper manual. So do I but it would be much more convenient with
an aperture simulator, then it wouldn't make any more noise than using
it with
a A F or FA lens...
Don Sanderson wrote:
I'm more of a "Green Button Advocate" than apologist.
Even if full K compatibility was added I'd
With the *ist's, you can just rotate the adaptor further to remove,
since the slower removal technique is intended for bodies with the
aperture simulator. I've no issue in mounting and removing lenses with
the adaptor staying on the lens. This is in fact the way the adaptor
normally stays, as I
I don't think so. The view finder in the MZ10 has the same coverage and
magnification as all the other lower tier MZ/ZX bodies.
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/bodies/MZ-ZX/index.html
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Don Sanderson wrote:
On the ZX-10 with its small and dim viewf
Rotate the lens/adaptor combo 1/3 further to remove. Note this trick
ONLY works on the cameras that lack the aperture simulator (It will
badly break cameras that have the aperture simulator if tried).
-Adam
Scott Loveless wrote:
The adapter stays on the camera. It's impossible to remove th
Glen wrote:
At 02:48 PM 1/2/2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Not only do you still need the green button, but you have to attach
an adapter as well. K and M lenses are much easier to use on the DSLR
cameras. Adapter = pain in the butt.
Paul
I've never used a screw-mount adapter. If you have mu
Those were the some of the "lowest" SLR models
pentax ever made for people who wanted an
SLR but knew nothing about them essentially.
They always had higher models at the time those
were made that did offer the features more
experienced users wanted/needed so no harm done..
I would want the AE with
On 1/2/06, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looks like a still from an old B horror movie! Right down to the
> extremely high contrast.
Thanks!
> I love it! I think a Holga might suit my style of shooting (such as
> it is). Gotta pick me up one of those babies (however, being a
>
Cool. Some nice shots here. I especially like the pic of Steve.
Paul
On Jan 2, 2006, at 9:47 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
So I got this Holga color flash camera for Christmas. Took it to a
family Christmas party and shot two rolls of TMAX 100 with the flash
on. The first roll was processed at iso
Wonderful moment, Frank. It's obvious they're enjoying being with
their Dad! I'm starting to think Toronto is just a fun place to be
all the time.
> frank theriault wrote:
>
> >A couple of weekends before Christmas, my two younger daughters
> >visited me in Toronto, so they could do a bit of Chr
Nice exposure. Overall, I really like it.
On 1/1/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's one across from where the TOPDML meet was held, but from about 3
> weeks ago when we had some snow on the ground.
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/80662747/
>
> One of my rare forays with my N
I really like that one. It drew me into it and I wanted to know exactly
what they were talking about
sandy
> I don't think pentax ever made a SLR that had K/M aperture priority AE
> without some sort of AE lock or at least AE compensation to go along with
> it...
I agree that it's pretty rare (and that it's pretty limiting, too), but I
do think that the MG, the MV, and the MV1 all had AE with no lock a
Congrats!
On 12/30/05, Ryan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sent on the day itself but list appeared to have eaten it up.. Anyway, small
> joy- a photo I took has been published around 4 x 6 in the Courier Mail (4th
> highest circulation Aussie paper (2nd highest broadsheet). Page 52 on xmas
> ev
The TOPDML photos always seem to indicate a good time being had. One
of these days I'll have to drive up and ruin the fun.
On 12/30/05, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I was killing time before the TO-PDML meet, I dropped by Henry's
> and scored myself a Spotmatic SP, with the nifty
2 DVD copies ( different brand media) would be even smarter than a DVD copy
and a hard drive copy.
hard drives just are nowhere near as "trustable" as optical media for
archive usage IMHO.
jco
-Original Message-
From: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 9:36 PM
On 1/2/06, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I got this Holga color flash camera for Christmas. Took it to a
> family Christmas party and shot two rolls of TMAX 100 with the flash
> on. The first roll was processed at iso 100 in Ilfosol S. Way
> underexposed. The second roll I push
The thing is, and I have thought of this several times
in the past and keep forgetting to mention it in the
"green button" threads, the green button function is
exactly like AE lock OPTION when using aperture priority AE.
I wouldn't want aperture priority AE without AE lock OPTION
so in essense wha
On 1/2/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check out
>
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> All comments solicited
>
> Yeah, nay, and/or otherwise
>
> What would you do differently?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Kenneth Waller
It's positively Wallerian, Ken (th
On 1/2/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool. I like the way the angle of the escalator breaks up the curve of
> the second floor.
>
> BTW. Damn that's a big store. I'd much prefer a small cramped one any day.
Well, as Marnie said, Indigo is like the Canadian version of Barnes
and Nob
So I got this Holga color flash camera for Christmas. Took it to a
family Christmas party and shot two rolls of TMAX 100 with the flash
on. The first roll was processed at iso 100 in Ilfosol S. Way
underexposed. The second roll I pushed to 400 in HC-110 dilution B.
It came out much better. Th
Nice texture, I honestly couldn't tell you what I would have done
differently. Oh, by the way did I mention that I hate you?
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
All comments solicited
Yeah, nay, and/or otherwise
What would you do dif
On 1/2/06, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great job, Frank! I love the way the fisheye adds to
> the sweep of the architecture, and your timing got the
> people on the escalator in just the right positions.
>
Thanks, Rick. I'm still learning how to use that lens to its full
potential, b
On 1/2/06, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ideal fish-eye shot. Sweep of the near railing dissected by the stairs
> and all nicely placed.
> I'd say you easily have a fourth reason...eh?
>
I have more than three reasons; I said I have three ~major~ reasons.
But, if you're referring to
I use it for *backup* -- that is, the *second* copies. I consider the
probability of both,
external HDD and my internal drives getting fried at exactly the same
moment to be small enough for all practical considerations.
BUT -- again, the *second* copies.
I would consider pretty stupid to keep t
Hi Godfrey and Happy New Year.
I like the idea of the FM ring on an FE2!
I'd simply scavenge it off the FM I have.
And thanks for all the other comments and suggestions in your
previous posts.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, Jan
On 1/2/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grabbed some lunch a while back and saw these three women in conversation.
> Spent some time and shot a roll of Tri-X with one of the Leicas. The woman
> on the viewer's right is the daughter of the woman in the center, and the
> woman on the
Very often I hear Pentaxers comparing the FA 77/1.8 Limited to the FA*
85/1.4. In some ways, the comparison is valid - they're Pentax's two
autofocus portrait lenses, but many of the comparisons do point out the
many differences between the two lenses, too - they're really very
different lenses by
Don Sanderson wrote:
Hi Kostas, you're right, the ZX-10 is fully compatible
with all K mount lenses, manual and Av modes work fine.
It is however a penta-mirror finder and quite small and
dark.
I've also found the autofocus to be very unpredictable.
For the low money they go for these days, the
It looks like a Kodak Gimmick/Kludge. It wouldn't be the first time
they've created something to bridge technology.
Perry Pellechia wrote:
Is this the start of a trend?
Real wide prime (23mm equiv.) coupled with a second zoom lens and ccd.
Interesting idea and it addresses wide angle on a co
On Jan 1, 2006, at 1:53 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
... And it's a lot cheaper to get an MX than an F.
My buddy in Reno, NV, just bought a Nikon F Photomic FTn head with
five Nikkor lenses, all in *mint* condition, for $340. He had the FTn
head overhauled for $50 more. Works perfectly, beautiful
On Jan 1, 2006, at 5:37 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
I have the Nikon FM and don't find the viewfinder anywhere near
as bright as the MX.
This may just be my copy, the prism shows very faint seperation
lines so is undoubtedly not at its best.
You have a bad prism and you could fit a brighter scre
On Dec 31, 2005, at 11:48 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
I would venture a guess that you get a good bit of pleasure
out of adapting some of those beautiful enlarging lenses to
M42, mounting them on an M42 bellows, adapting that to K to
fit on a nice KX and taking beautiful images to help sell
the wh
Don,
I dunno what you're looking at, but I owned and worked with Nikon FM/
FE2 cameras for 20 years.
The FM2/FE2 have interchangeable focusing screens that are 1 stop
brighter than the FM, and the FM is on par with the MX as far as my
eye can tell, both for brightness and for magnification
On Dec 31, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
Anyone know the register on Canon and Minolta bodies???
http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mounts.htm
Godfrey
I'm more of a "Green Button Advocate" than apologist.
Even if full K compatibility was added I'd still use
the green button as I do now.
I can set the aperture I want, zoom in on the subject,
tap the button and it sets the proper shutter speed.
No fiddling with the dial and watching the little LEDs
In a message dated 1/2/2006 3:00:31 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.storagereview.com/guide2000/ref/hdd/perf/qual/issuesCooling.html
http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/technolo/drivetemp/drivetemp.htm
http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/perf/qual/issues-c.html
Rob Studdert
=
On Jan 1, 2006, at 2:16 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
It just occurred to me a couple weeks ago to put a screw mount lens on
my *ist film body. Can anyone else say "aperture priority"? Feel
free to point at me and laugh. I suddenly feel a multiple M42 lens
enablement coming on.
Can't say as I'd
Marnie -
Yeah - it's easy to recommend an expensive solution. But the key is
to have at least two copies. If the two copies can be different types
of media all the better.
In it's simplest form, it can be a working copy on your hard drive
with one or two sets of DVD's as backup. One can be kep
I like the concept overall and you caught some great expressions. I
think a bit more could be done to separate the subject and background
elements, to direct the eye to the right associations. Tonally, it's
a bit constrained on my screen ... too much close-together-gray, not
enough highligh
Hi Kostas, you're right, the ZX-10 is fully compatible
with all K mount lenses, manual and Av modes work fine.
It is however a penta-mirror finder and quite small and
dark.
I've also found the autofocus to be very unpredictable.
For the low money they go for these days, the 5n is 10
times the camer
In a message dated 1/2/2006 2:46:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have a go at it, Marnie ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/3women-23.html
> You might want to take out the white purse on the right
> (w
In a message dated 1/2/2006 4:48:51 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
All comments solicited
Yeah, nay, and/or otherwise
What would you do differently?
Thanks in advance
Kenneth Waller
Whoa. Grea
that's interesting, your in complete opposition to the "green button"
apologists who insist it's easy and not a big deal. What I want
is a higher model that supports all kmount lenses fully.
That would be nice feature, especially when you consider
that most pentax brand bayonet lenses are not A com
Hi,
I'm looking for a form fitting case for my DS2. I had a zing case for
my PZ1p that was great-- I like the tight fitting neoprene, and it
gave good impact protection. Can anyone recommend a similar Zing
product you've had experience with? Or an off brand would be good
too-- the pentax b
Ronald Arvidsson wrote:
aggresively one uses the skis. When doing photos of downhill skiing -
use fast shutterspeed as skiers move quite fast.
I know it depends on actual shooting conditions (focal length, skiers
speed etc.) but that is exactly what I will try to avoid on my next
winter hol
I tend to doubt it. It looks like a gimmick to me.
Godfrey
On Jan 2, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Perry Pellechia wrote:
Is this the start of a trend?
Real wide prime (23mm equiv.) coupled with a second zoom lens and ccd.
Interesting idea and it addresses wide angle on a compact.
http://www.dpreview.co
What was the vantage point. A mountain top?
No, actually it was taken from the access road, south of the park. At
roughly the same elevation or slightly higher.
Thanks for commenting Paul.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re:
You're welcome, Jack.
The excursion was fun ... almost entirely a family visit. I think I
took 10 pictures or so with the Panasonic LX1, all of the latest
newborn in the family.
Godfrey
On Jan 2, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks, Godfrey! Best wishes for the New Year.
Hope you
Excellent. What was the vantage point. A mountain top?
Paul
On Jan 2, 2006, at 7:47 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
All comments solicited
Yeah, nay, and/or otherwise
What would you do differently?
Thanks in advance
Kenneth Wa
Kostas,
Don is right about the dim finder. The plastic mount also makes me
think he might be right about it is not being worth the effort to fix
it. Still I like to take things apart
Perry.
On 1/2/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Don Sanderson wrote
Yeah, I like it. Almost abstract. It makes we want to see a wider
view. I mean this is a good way. Mystery makes it interesting.
Perry.
On 1/2/06, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check out
>
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> All comments solicite
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Don Sanderson wrote:
On the ZX-10 with its small and dim viewfinder I doubt
repairing it is worth the effort.
I am pretty sure the ZX-10 is a pentaprism, full K-mount camera. It's
a sleeper if ever there was one.
Kostas
Don,
Thanks for the confirmation and advice. While I have no real plans to
use it, I love a challenge, and would not mind trying to fix the
ZX-10. It might be fun to try but do you know of an online source for
a service manual? Mark Robert's site seems to be inaccessible at the
moment so I canno
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
All comments solicited
Yeah, nay, and/or otherwise
What would you do differently?
Thanks in advance
Kenneth Waller
I've had several MZ/ZX bodies that acted this way.
What I found in all but 1 case was that the gear on the
mirror assy drive motor was loose from the shaft.
The sound is the motor trying to 'cock' the mirror or
shutter assy.
I've fixed 3 of them by pushing the gear back on and
securing it with supe
The adapter stays on the camera. It's impossible to remove the
adapter until you have unscrewed the lens.
On 1/2/06, Glen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never used a screw-mount adapter. If you have multiple screw-mount
> lenses do you buy an adapter for each one, or do most people use a singl
Yes, the ND deep coverage has been noticeably lacking. They don't seem
to be playing with the confidence that they displayed during the
regular season. Second half kickoff is upon us. Let's hope for
something better.
Paul
(Watching the game but listening to U2.)
On Jan 2, 2006, at 6:50 PM, fr
One good eBay purchase I made several months back was a ZX-10 with a
FA 50/f1.7 and FA 80-200 for $85. Since I really was only interested
in the lenses I was not too upset to discover that the camera seemed
to be faulty. But now that I am doing some New Year's cleaning I
thought I would ask the g
It's interesting to note that since the *ist (film body) has no "green
button", there is no metering at all in manual. All other settings
are effectively aperture priority as is, I'm assuming, the digital
bodies.
On 1/2/06, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd have to say it's exactly the o
Actually I'd like to see people virtually filling the background. The
obvious concentration level would show even more evidence of intensity
and emphasize their mental isolation.
That is, if no cheek high mini-skirts (in this case) or white attired
massive rear ends. Ideally, faceless or turned w
Well ??
What news??
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 1/2/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cheer, cheer for old Notre Dame!
Hmmm...
It's 1/2 time, and Coach Weiss has a few adjustments to make. Not
that I'm giving up or anything.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Rob Studdert a écrit :
LOL, your procedure sounds pretty safe however you don't seem to be factoring
the travel and duplicate equipment costs into your price per GB :-)
You're right, my math was pretty quick and dirty (BTW I didn't count the
laptop, which is provided by my dear employer ;-) )
Frank,
The warming up is definitely an improvement. However,
this photo is unsettling, because:
1. You have had a long run of -sharp- photos recently,
and
2. This is the second shot this week, IIRC, in living
color!
Massive paradigm shift here. I'm thoroughly
disoriented.
Need a drink but go
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> And of course you remember Blackstone Avenue on the south side of old
> Chicago town. Not to mention the Blackstone Rangers, the Chicago street
> gang that used to chase me when I delivered pizzas on their turf. Our
> congress gave them credibility when they called their
On 3 Jan 2006 at 0:11, Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) wrote:
> This solves the redundancy issue, the media refreshing
> issue, the increasing data volume issue, all at once, and at a low cost
> (HD GigaByte is much cheaper than DVD GigaByte)... And I still burn best
> images to DVDs/CDs just to be o
1 - 100 of 303 matches
Mail list logo
