On Dec 6, 2006, at 9:15 PM, Bob W wrote:
It seems a little odd to hear someone regret the passing of an airport
for homes when here there is always someone protesting about new
airports, either because they will destroy a wildlife haven, or
because they have to flatten a thousand homes to
It's hard to find a filter that is as flare resistant as the lens.
I agree with you 100% on that argument in fact I sometimes take the
filter off when shooting in situations where flare is likely to be a
problem (e.g. backlit situations). OTOH having some protection for the
front element allows
On 07/12/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need the little disc that goes on top of the rewind lever. Don't
know what happened to mine. Does anyone have a broken LX that they're
using as a parts camera? Would love to find this piece.
Paul
You should still be able to order it as a
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/06 Wed PM 07:58:59 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Another interview articles
Tom C wrote:
I take it then you saying the resolution limit has been reached with
digital?
No. What I'm saying is that
From: rodney almodovar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/06 Wed PM 10:06:15 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Any purchase an extended warranty on their K10D
Hello,
When I purchased my *istD several years back, I bought the extended
warranty through my local camera shop. I never did have
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060825142318
--
new photos ever so often... http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
When I buy the K10D I will be taking out extended warranty. I just have had
to have my istD repaired under extended warranty and believe its great
insurance. (My delete button wouldn't work.
Regards
Charles Wilson
Sydney Australia
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
My guess is pretty close to Paul's. A 22 Mpix sensor has been
suggested before, so if that's still in production it will have my
bet. Pricewise my guess is between $5000 and $6000.
As for appeal... Throw in some weather sealing, and I believe at least
some non-pentax outdoor/landscape
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/07 Thu AM 11:03:26 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
My guess is pretty close to Paul's. A 22 Mpix sensor has been
suggested before, so if that's still in production it will have my
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Jack, my terrier mutt, who my daughter saved from a dumpster one
January:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3023179
I like Jack!
He looks like one happy pup!
keith whaley
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi William
why is the dog called Burnese in english when it is a Berner Sennenhund
from Berne in Switzerland ?
Oh, all those lovely dogs, my cat Leo Leu Lowenzahn really hates dogs and
even tries to attack them.
greetings
Markus
Let me guess...
Because when some
mike wilson wrote:
What about SR?
Yes, please? :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hello! I have been lurking on this list on and off for the past few
years, but did not subscribe until now (I belong to too many
subscription lists already). I have found many of the email
discussions positively enlightening and the photographs from the list
members superb. Anyway, here I am - I
I'd prefer a 13-14+ MP 35mm full frame DSLR.
Dave
On 12/7/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will have a 24 megapixel sensor, it will cost $4000, and it will
appeal to a wide range of pros and serious amateurs. That's my
prediction.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 07/12/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer a 13-14+ MP 35mm full frame DSLR.
The standard reply generally is: 645 is the new full frame camera! ;-)
But hey yeah, I'm with you, and chuck in an aperture feedback sensor
too, $3k would have me handing over the cash. No way I'll
John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Indeed a common problem is the little mirror for the arperture
reading in the viewfinder.
I always wanted to know can that be fixed with a CLA?
It's a common problem, and easy to fix. There's a tiny mirror sitting
on a flexible metal holder behind
On 12/7/06, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A color one, for a change:
http://color.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=149
K10D, A50/1.4, shot full open at 1/4000s, in the sun. Kind of a grab
shot, but so are all my pics :)
Comments welcome.
Yes, as a matter of fact I do still hate you.
On 12/7/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/12/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer a 13-14+ MP 35mm full frame DSLR.
The standard reply generally is: 645 is the new full frame camera! ;-)
Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the
Did you compare the cost of the extended warranty with the cost of the
repair?
As a general rule, never insure against any risk you can afford to pay
for. Over your life you will spend two or three times as much on premiums
as you would on repairs and replacements. Who do you think is
On 12/7/06, N Ambalavanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello! I have been lurking on this list on and off for the past few
years, but did not subscribe until now (I belong to too many
subscription lists already). I have found many of the email
discussions positively enlightening and the
William Robb wrote:
Did you hunt your GSP?
No. Biggest mistake I made with him. That dog was born to point and
retrieve. We pretended to hunt, take a walk in the fields, he'd point
birds (bobwhite mostly), I'd flush them and we'd watch them fly away.
He was s steady. His dad was a
Jostein Øksne wrote:
My guess is pretty close to Paul's. A 22 Mpix sensor has been
suggested before, so if that's still in production it will have my
bet. Pricewise my guess is between $5000 and $6000.
First iteration: 18MP, US$3000. 18-month upgrades to 22MP and 30MP.
As for appeal...
Thanks for looking, Boris. Good point regarding the child chair. I
intend to go back in and burn in the tabletop a bit.
Paul
On Dec 7, 2006, at 2:30 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
My mother eats her lunch in the kitchen. I shot her from the
adjoining room. 800 ISO, f4 @ 1/45th. My wife,
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Digital Image Studio wrote:
Assuming that they are cashed up sufficiently to fulfill the demand
that they have created though their aggressive pricing.
Rob, what aggressive pricing?
SRPs and actuals from http://www.parkcameras.com/
No Canon 40D
Canon 30D 1,100 742
Thanks Rob. I'll give it a try.
Paul
On Dec 7, 2006, at 3:46 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 07/12/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need the little disc that goes on top of the rewind lever. Don't
know what happened to mine. Does anyone have a broken LX that they're
using as a
They look useful:
http://www.joby.com/index.html
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Welcome. Enjoyed your photo.net page. Some very good work there.
Paul Stenquist
On Dec 7, 2006, at 7:29 AM, N Ambalavanan wrote:
Hello! I have been lurking on this list on and off for the past few
years, but did not subscribe until now (I belong to too many
subscription lists already). I have
I think the 645D smaller than the Canon full-frame DSLRs. I used only
6x7 for quite a while. Took it everywhere.
Paul
On Dec 7, 2006, at 7:51 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 12/7/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/12/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer a
Here we have the opposite problem. Some developers want to create an
artificial lake close to the flight path of our airport. The airport
are fighting that one pretty hard as they fear birdstrike.
Birdstrikes are bad news... one of my very few big concerns
while taking off and
It's bigger than a 5D, smaller than a 1Ds.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I think the 645D smaller than the Canon full-frame DSLRs. I used only
6x7 for quite a while. Took it everywhere.
Paul
On Dec 7, 2006, at 7:51 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 12/7/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just one catch. The existing 645 600mm is manual focus. :-(
Jostein
On 12/7/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jostein Øksne wrote:
My guess is pretty close to Paul's. A 22 Mpix sensor has been
suggested before, so if that's still in production it will have my
bet. Pricewise my guess
David Savage wrote:
On 12/7/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/12/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer a 13-14+ MP 35mm full frame DSLR.
The standard reply generally is: 645 is the new full frame camera! ;-)
Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument.
I get them on used kit and stuff with potential expensive failures
outside the manufacturers warranty period, unless the Manufacturer has a
2 year or longer warranty (Pentax is 2 years in Canada).
The sole exception to that is Future Shop's CSP, which is worth it for
the no-hassle policy.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I'm interested in your thoughts on this one.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 38mm, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/350 sec @ f/13
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3811.htm
The criticism I have is something over which you had no control: The
light is too harsh to make this work really
Looks like it's made from flexible coolant hose :-)
Dave
On 12/7/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They look useful:
http://www.joby.com/index.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 12/7/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the past
(or are currently) lugged around a Pentax 645 on their daily walk, to
work etc for their day to day shooting?
Considering that a 1Ds is the size and
You are =really= fortunate to be in striking distance
of such locations! Since you are, I would visit it
again. For me, the shot lacks a center of interest.
If there were big crashing waves sending up spray, or
if the texture of the rocks was more apparent (I like
William Robb's suggestion of
Welcome, N! (what should we call you?). Lovely
gallery. This group will make it all too easy for you
to add to your lens collection!
Rick
--- N Ambalavanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello! I have been lurking on this list on and off
for the past few
years, but did not subscribe until now (I
Really nice quick-reflexes shot, and I like the colors
and composition. I wish the DOF were a little
greater, though--only the cuff of the red jacket
appears to be in focus.
Rick
--- Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A color one, for a change:
On 08/12/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like it's made from flexible coolant hose :-)
Not quite, but my Plamps are ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax
...and a 1 kg battery to provide enough power to move
that sensor around!
--- Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
What about SR?
Yes, please? :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Check the terms of your VISA/Mastercard. Often purchases made with
these will extend the warranty to double the manufacturer's warranty up
to an additional year.
-P
Charles Wilson wrote:
When I buy the K10D I will be taking out extended warranty. I just have had
to have my istD repaired
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No. What I'm saying is that we've reached a point at which average
consumers are going to be able to see very clearly that more
megapixels
don't necessarily mean a better camera (or better pictures). That fact
holds true for
Not to mention plane strikes. My uncle gave up flying
and sold his Cessna 172 after witnessing a midair
collision. He was waiting to take off from a small
field with only an advisory com, and the plane ahead
of him squarely hit crossing traffic after takeoff,
killing two pilots he knew well.
It's a beautiful story-telling shot, Paul. You even
manage to make a cluttered kitchen look beautiful.
Would you please come photograph mine? bg
Rick
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
My mother eats her lunch in the kitchen. I shot
her from the
adjoining room. 800 ISO,
Thanks, Boris. I'll interpret your suggestion as an indication that the
shot is a worthy effort.
I think the lifting fog makes the difference in this scene and there is
no way to re-shoot it.
I might mess with gaussian blur a bit and see what it does for me.
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL
Welcome, Ambal,
You have put up a really nice collection and it's obvious you've done
some traveling. =)
Very incidentally, Aspen Lake is near Aspen, but its actual name is
Maroon Lake. The peaks above, Maroon Bells. Have been there five or six
times, but always in the fall.
If your pockets are
Thanks Rick.
On Dec 7, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
It's a beautiful story-telling shot, Paul. You even
manage to make a cluttered kitchen look beautiful.
Would you please come photograph mine? bg
Rick
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
My mother eats her lunch in
Jostein Øksne wrote:
Just one catch. The existing 645 600mm is manual focus. :-(
Jostein
Not a catch for me. I still rely a lot on manual focus. Even for some
flight shots. :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Why do you want to use a lead-acid cell?
:-)
Jostein
On 12/7/06, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...and a 1 kg battery to provide enough power to move
that sensor around!
--- Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
What about SR?
Yes, please? :-)
Jostein
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/07 Thu PM 01:57:26 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Another interview articles
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No. What I'm saying is that we've reached a point at which average
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/07 Thu PM 12:10:08 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax 645D Sensor size(?)
mike wilson wrote:
What about SR?
Yes, please? :-)
Time to start buying lenses, I think
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Rick Womer wrote:
Not to mention plane strikes. My uncle gave up flying
and sold his Cessna 172 after witnessing a midair
collision. He was waiting to take off from a small
field with only an advisory com, and the plane ahead
of him squarely hit crossing traffic after
David Savage wrote:
On 12/7/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the past
(or are currently) lugged around a Pentax 645 on their daily walk, to
work etc for their day to day shooting?
Considering that a 1Ds is
Mark Roberts was responsible for this appearing on my LCD -
The criticism I have is something over which you had no control: The
light is too harsh to make this work really well.
So it begs the hypothetical question - would you have taken the image or
just enjoyed the scene for what it was
http://www.nps.gov/archive/usar/photos1/indexa.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Mark Roberts was responsible for this appearing on my LCD -
The criticism I have is something over which you had no control: The
light is too harsh to make this work really well.
So it begs the hypothetical question - would you have taken the image
or
just enjoyed the
Similar, only focal length entry, not aperture (technically the D200 only needs
the aperture info, the focal length just allows for multiple lens info to be
stored).
-Adam
David J Brooks wrote:
Ok, so its the same as the D200 with the older Nikon lenses, set the
focal lenght
Thanks
Woh. Very saturated on my monitor. But nice framing and pic. I would
like to see more dof though, at least enough to see some more detail on
the old lady.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A color one, for a change:
http://color.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=149
K10D, A50/1.4, shot full
It looks like a pretty spot but maybe just not the best time of day/angle of
light. The top left where the sky is peaking through and what looks like a
little flare, could be cropped out, IMO.Overall I find the composition
pleasing.
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For me, there is a quality to this light - some of the harshness
emphasizes the feeling there. I have a bunch of shots the other
direction that don't look harsh, but have a totally different kind of
feel to them.
There is also the learning factor - applying techniques and seeing how
they affect
answering my own mail :)
I love my local Staples guys -
I can get 5.0 by itself for $89.00 and the rebate
without having to do it on line
(did I mention I hate to buy things on line?)
phew
happy birthyday to me
ann
ann sanfedele wrote:
ack
I didn't realize what PREMIER meant - I just
That's Tyra - aka
Ch Blackcomb's Dreaming of Ewe AGN (SGDC MJDC OAJ)
She's a Belgian Tervuren and came from a kennel out in BC, but she
lives with me. She's a gem. Brains as well as beauty.
I also own her half-sister, Indy. She arrived at our house exactly 1
year ago today!
I just bought some printable cd's
Would you like me to send you some?
ann
graywolf wrote:
Yes and the R220 is already a year old. I kind of like my R200. I've
just started using it to print CD's, so the local stores quit carrying
printable CD's. That seems to be the story of my life. Too
On 7/12/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the past
(or are currently) lugged around a Pentax 645 on their daily walk, to
work etc for their day to day shooting?
I'm always the odd one out. 1D+EF24-70 2.8 + spare battery.
I looks like it would have alot of vibration.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They look useful:
http://www.joby.com/index.html
--
Someone handed me a picture and said, This is a picture of me when I
was younger. Every picture of you is when you were younger. ...Here's
a picture of me when I'm
I missed the first post
I see, Ambal that you are also on photo net...
your shots are very nice and I chuckled when I saw one particular flower...
a variet we obviously both admire :)
Your second butterfly shot is particularly lovely - that's a variety
called a swallow tail -
which one I'm
Dan, thanks for posting - its helps us remember.
I noted in the paper today an article stating that due to extremely heavy
(more than ever anticipated) usage, the memorial is due for a
rehabilitation. Seems it's slowly sinking.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=160060811759
Seems like they are trying to unload these
older leftover models now.
How about that kit lens : Pentax SMC FAJ 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 Autofocus
Zoom Lens?
Is that a APS or FF lens? Curious be because 28 isnt very wide
on APS now is
Thanks all
Dave
Quoting P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes. (ambiguous answers a specialty).
David J Brooks wrote:
Had a nice chat with e fellow how does our BW on the Danforth, and he
is VERY exited about the K10D.
He had 1 question which i could not answer
Will the SR work with K, A
Cotty wrote:
On 7/12/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the past
(or are currently) lugged around a Pentax 645 on their daily walk, to
work etc for their day to day shooting?
I'm always the odd one out. 1D+EF24-70
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: 5. desember 2006 20:30
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: Norwegian novelist
I wonder though if I program multi-thread/multi-process applications and
thus think several
Here is one more taken away from the sun at about the same time as
Rugged Coast. Still doesn't have the same kind of feel.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 31mm, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/350 sec @ f/11
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3785.htm
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 10:12 +1100, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 07/12/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, it seems to be best price-to-features ratio. One of my
private clients whom I tutor recently bought her first digital camera -
without consulting me. She ended up
This one was shot away from the sun the same time frame as Rugged
Coast - there is an entirely different feeling to it.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/350 sec @ f/11
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3752.htm
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 23:39 -0600, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Michael Chan
Subject: Re: My Next Dog?
I humbly introduce my friend, The Griffin:
http://www.mcmm.net/albums/20040203_snowshoe/img_1724_m.jpg
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=160060811759
Seems like they are trying to unload these
older leftover models now.
How about that kit lens : Pentax SMC FAJ 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 Autofocus
Zoom Lens?
Is that a APS or FF lens? Curious be because 28
Kenneth Waller wrote:
So it begs the hypothetical question - would you have taken the image or
just enjoyed the scene for what it was worth?
Something that I've come to grips with after many years of capturing images
that I eventually discard for similar reasons. There are very few images
Last one, I promise. This is shot back into the harsh light, but
gives it a rough quality that I like.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/350 sec @ f/8.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3760.htm
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 00:42 -0600, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer
Subject: RE: My Next Dog?
Hi William
why is the dog called Burnese in english when it is a Berner
Sennenhund
from Berne in Switzerland ?
The Canadian Kennel Club calls them
Hi all,
Guess I am joining the ever growing K10D club now :-)
Got a big box set from Germany today, with the K10D,
grip, AF540FGZ flash and a spare battery ...
Unfortunately I will not be able to do much with it for several
weeks since I broke my leg two weeks ago, and have a long
titanium
Jan,
Bad to hear that.
You weren't on a motorcycle were you?
Speed recovery, Bob S.
On 12/7/06, Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Guess I am joining the ever growing K10D club now :-)
Got a big box set from Germany today, with the K10D,
grip, AF540FGZ flash and a spare battery
Bruce Dayton wrote:
This one was shot away from the sun the same time frame as Rugged
Coast - there is an entirely different feeling to it.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/350 sec @ f/11
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3752.htm
I like it! Nice and bright and I like
This one, for me, has too many subjects. The surf,
rocks, bridge, ship, sailboat, and even the tree on
the hill seem to compete for my (limited) attention.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one was shot away from the sun the same time
frame as Rugged
Coast - there is an
I like this one, too. The colors of the rocks and
water are nice, and there is a peaceful mood that
matches the lighting.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is one more taken away from the sun at about
the same time as
Rugged Coast. Still doesn't have the same kind of
Happy Birthday, Ann!
-graywolf (who can take a hint grin)
ann sanfedele wrote:
answering my own mail :)
I love my local Staples guys -
I can get 5.0 by itself for $89.00 and the rebate
without having to do it on line
(did I mention I hate to buy things on line?)
phew
happy
Jan,
Ouch!
You should rent a copy of the movie Rear Window and
take photographic inspiration!
Rick
--- Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Guess I am joining the ever growing K10D club now
:-)
Got a big box set from Germany today, with the K10D,
grip, AF540FGZ flash and a
Between #2 and 3, I prefer this one. The little tree on top of the left
hill made me grin.
I'd mess with the light some (in the enhance menu) using the
light/shadow tool.
The bright surf froth has dominated the meter and dulled the balance of
the scene..on my monitor.
Nice composition!
Jack
---
The spray behind the rock makes this shot. I can
almost hear the surf! The violence of the surf and
spray and the harshness of the light complement each
other.
Very nice!
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last one, I promise. This is shot back into the
harsh light, but
gives
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 05:13:06 +0100, P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that your MX is properly adjusted.
When I got it it had the mirror bumper glued on the mirror and light
baffling on the back door. I'm glad to hear there was something done
properly on the camera :o)
Like this, as well. You've cropped it to concentrate the eye by
featuring the scene's action. Very good lighting!
Well seen and frozen.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last one, I promise. This is shot back into the harsh light, but
gives it a rough quality that I like.
If you light candles, be sure you're not near any fire sprinkler heads.
(BG)
Seriously, have a happy and memorable one.
Jack
--- ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks, Tom
sunday it is
ann
graywolf wrote:
Happy Birthday, Ann!
-graywolf (who can take a hint grin)
ann
Who wouldn't, (uh oh, now we're in for it).
David Savage wrote:
I'd prefer a 13-14+ MP 35mm full frame DSLR.
Dave
On 12/7/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will have a 24 megapixel sensor, it will cost $4000, and it will
appeal to a wide range of pros and serious
thanks, Tom
sunday it is
ann
graywolf wrote:
Happy Birthday, Ann!
-graywolf (who can take a hint grin)
ann sanfedele wrote:
answering my own mail :)
I love my local Staples guys -
I can get 5.0 by itself for $89.00 and the rebate
without having to do it on line
(did I mention I hate to
Did I answer the question?
Doug Brewer
I'd say.
Thanks
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Rugged Coast
Kenneth Waller wrote:
So it begs the hypothetical question - would you have taken the image or
just enjoyed the scene
Nope, not wide at all, (like 43mm on a FF film camera), and the FAJ is
FF. They're unloading a kit they put together fairly cheaply at a
relatively high price.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=160060811759
Seems like they are trying to unload these
Hi Bob,
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:01:05 -0600, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Bad to hear that.
You weren't on a motorcycle were you?
No, it was a very unlucky fall at the river Rhine shore.
I fell onto a block of concrete with my left thigh (femur),
double fracture, just below the hip joint ...
Regards, JvW
Cotty wrote:
On 7/12/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well I don't prescribe to that BS argument. How many here, in the past
(or are currently) lugged around a Pentax 645 on their daily walk, to
work etc for their day to day shooting?
I'm always the odd one out. 1D+EF24-70
High price? Wasnt the istD originally
over $1000 for just the body? This is
about $450 for a new *istD body and
about $50 for all the rest including the
FAJ lens by my estimate.How do you
know they got them (the bodies) cheap?
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I´m not a very eager pixel peeper but I think this is worth showing:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=277182
Handheld at 1/20s, ISO1600 and underexposed one step. Processed RAW
to jpg in the camera with standard settings, no sharpening or noise
reduction afterwards.
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
