Hi Team,
I finally have my server back up and operational, long story (thanks
Christian) and a couple of lenses worth in $ value so it's better left
alone. All that now behind me and now that I'm in a better humor I
would like to assess how my now relatively old hardware is performing
(file
On 5/20/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(2 x 9000 pixels x 16bit,
@ what resolution (300 PPI)?
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Beautiful!
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Christian
Sendt: 11. maj 2007 20:11
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: PESO - last one for a
Most of the myths around the deaths of famous people are just that -
myths. I include the Kennedys in this. In general the most prosaic,
dull and boring explanations are usually the correct ones.
There seems to be some need within people to look for less ordinary
explanations when it comes to
Interesting one
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6665723.stm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 5/19/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
How about Thunder is caused by angels bowling
...or Canadians snoring.
I always womdered why the bears in the habitat looked tired. Must be
from lack of sleep:-)
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I just finished watcjing parts of the WhiBal video. He is doing the
white balance conversion in Raw but is there a way todo this with
jpgs.
Meaqning he is opening the shot and the WhiBal shot and adjusting the
WB. Can this be done in PS in Jpeg mode.
Its really cloudy out this morning, for the
Nice,
but as the article says that at F1.4 but the edges might suffer, and
considering that it's been tested on a digital camera (which still has
smaller exposure area, right?), I guess it will be pretty useless on a
film camera. And what's the point in stopping down? Then the 'poor man'
Your bike may be similar in many respects to those, but I expect the
engineering that went into producing it is greatly improved,
even if the
appearance hasn't changed all that much.
Here's an interesting article called Myths and Milestones in Bicycle
Evolution:
Beautiful composition. I agree. Would love to see a large version.
On May 19, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Lovely. Serene and intense. I wish I could see it a lot larger.
G
On May 19, 2007, at 12:34 PM, Toine wrote:
Actually a very small dune on a very large beach:
It doesn't matter. It just has to be 2000 x 9000 pixels.
On May 20, 2007, at 2:23 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 5/20/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(2 x 9000 pixels x 16bit,
@ what resolution (300 PPI)?
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
AlexG wrote:
women have something to say :p
Oh, you're a femininist. Isn't that cute. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On May 20, 2007, at 5:11 AM, Cotty wrote:
Interesting one
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6665723.stm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Check out her photos:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rebba/
She's one damned fine photographer!
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Fabulous stuff. No wonder it's being stolen. But you wouldn't think
they could make nice prints from images that small. Perhaps they
fractaled them. Still.
Paul
On May 20, 2007, at 9:19 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
On May 20, 2007, at 5:11 AM, Cotty wrote:
Interesting one
Well it made 15 seconds worth of difference. Why? I don't know.
Cheers,
Dave
On 5/20/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't matter. It just has to be 2000 x 9000 pixels.
On May 20, 2007, at 2:23 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 5/20/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/20/07, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 20, 2007, at 5:11 AM, Cotty wrote:
Interesting one
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6665723.stm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Check out her photos:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rebba/
She's one damned fine
Cotty wrote:
Interesting one
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6665723.stm
One of the ironies of the entire situation is that Rebekka is Flickr's
greatest success story. She's a brilliant photographer (I'm one of the
zillion users that have her on their contact list) and her
It's sad that Kennedy was killed, and it's sad to think that a single
non-entity could kill the President of the United States. But most
assassinations and attempted assassinations of US Presidents have been
just that. The computer analysis of the bullet trajectory shows that
the bullet
Terrible to hear.
I despise watermarks but maybe it's time to start using them.
I have no plans to sell anything I shoot, but i'll be god damned if
some jackass thinks he can make some money off
1) something I do to amuse myself
using
2) gear I paid for that will never pay for itself.
And I
Hey, leave Tom out of this. If you fall asleep while it's raining and
the sun is out, tennis balls will fly out of your TV.
Norm
David Savage wrote:
Sitting too close to the TV will give you square eyes.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Ya want a conspiracy theory here's one. Jimmy Hoffa is feeling the heat
from Bobby Kennedy, (Attorney General and brother of the President). He
goes to the Godfather of New Orleans Carlos Marcello to get the heat
taken off, (The teamsters strike fund is a piggy bank for he Mob and it
Hoffa
In a message dated 5/19/2007 9:02:54 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looks to me like there were multiple overlapping, conflicting
conspiracies; at least 2 to kill him and another 2 or 3 to cover it up.
At least some of the people who killed Kennedy wanted Castro to
In a message dated 5/19/2007 9:10:17 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
women have something to say :p
===
Men don't need to ask for directions.
Marnie aka Doe :-P
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be
In a message dated 5/20/2007 6:38:19 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fabulous stuff. No wonder it's being stolen. But you wouldn't think
they could make nice prints from images that small. Perhaps they
fractaled them. Still.
Paul
===
Maybe they weren't nice
On May 20, 2007, at 10:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Men don't need to ask for directions.
Of course they need to, but they just don't.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The USAF killed him because he was about to reveal the secrets of
Nazca, the Bermuda Triangle and Roswell, thus exposing the Illuminati.
The magic bullet was a classified++ miniature fighter jet flown by a
nano-scale pilot developed under the Accelerated Human Evolution
Program which the USAF had
Heck, I didn't have to resort to bad science fiction. Have you met El-Ron?
Bob W wrote:
The USAF killed him because he was about to reveal the secrets of
Nazca, the Bermuda Triangle and Roswell, thus exposing the Illuminati.
The magic bullet was a classified++ miniature fighter jet flown by a
On May 20, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Bob W wrote:
The USAF killed him because he was about to reveal the secrets of
Nazca, the Bermuda Triangle and Roswell, thus exposing the Illuminati.
The magic bullet was a classified++ miniature fighter jet flown by a
nano-scale pilot developed under the
If you're using Lightroom, you do white balance correction in exactly
the same way regardless of whether you're working with a RAW, JPEG,
TIFF or PSD file.
If you're using Photoshop, of course you do white balance correction
in Camera Raw with RAW files using a similar eyedropper tool. For
And if you have PS CS3 you can do WB, exposure, sharpening etc.
non-destructively to .tif .jpg files as you would to a RAW file in
ACR.
Cheers,
Dave
On 5/21/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're using Lightroom, you do white balance correction in exactly
the same way
No, but I know a man who has!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/panorama/6655207.stm
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of P. J. Alling
Sent: 20 May 2007 16:58
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Way, Way OT: Help!
Ah yes: forgot that CS3/Camera Raw v4 implements the same ability to
work on JPEG/TIFF files as Lightroom v1.0. :-)
G
On May 20, 2007, at 9:52 AM, David Savage wrote:
And if you have PS CS3 you can do WB, exposure, sharpening etc.
non-destructively to .tif .jpg files as you would to a RAW
Hi,
If you're going to GFM, can I politely ask if anyone will mind burning
my selected file(s) to CD for me? I'll be bringing a rather ancient
PowerBook (circa 2000!) but it has two long-life batteries aboard and a
gig of RAM and it's indestructable - a great road machine.
Can I FireWire my
Two more shots from the same island, Terschelling. This time two
different orchids from the same species.
http://leende.net/galleries/Terschelling%202007/6405.htm
http://leende.net/galleries/Terschelling%202007/6430.htm
The first is rendered with a reduced saturation and the second in bw.
I like
I will print it big once I receive the roll of epson paper.
If you click on the image you see a larger version (1500 px wide).
Toine
On 5/20/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lovely. Serene and intense. I wish I could see it a lot larger.
G
On May 19, 2007, at 12:34 PM, Toine
On 5/20/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're going to GFM, can I politely ask if anyone will mind burning
my selected file(s) to CD for me? I'll be bringing a rather ancient
PowerBook (circa 2000!) but it has two long-life batteries aboard and a
gig of RAM and it's indestructable - a
Ying and Yang...
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=17653full=1
Have your honest and brutal say...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'll have my wife's MacBook along (rather than my HP),
and of course you are welcome to use its burner.
Rick
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If you're going to GFM, can I politely ask if anyone
will mind burning
my selected file(s) to CD for me? I'll be bringing a
rather ancient
On 20/5/07, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'll have my wife's MacBook along (rather than my HP),
and of course you are welcome to use its burner.
Excellent, thanks Rick. Hey aren't you in the UK???
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 20/5/07, Mat Maessen, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'll have my somewhat-less-ancient G3 iBook with me, and I can do the
burning for you. Just make sure to throw in a firewire cable just in
case I forget mine.
Mat, that's great, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
So, you've gone freelance? A new job? Or a one-off?
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the tremendous response to my request for
help this
morning. It was immensely helpful. I was faced with
having to develop
several campaigns in one day and didn't really have
Is there af PEF plug in for Photoshop that supports K10D files, please?
A friend og mine needs to know - (I use Capture One 3.7.7, which supports
the K10D PEF files).
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free
Please feel free to watch my latest experiments:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/Blomster/Blomstalbum.html
Regards
Jens
http://www.jensbladt.dk
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Jens -
Adobe Camera Raw is packaged with Photoshop. It will read the PEF files.
See you later, gs
http://georgesphotos.net
On 5/20/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there af PEF plug in for Photoshop that supports K10D files, please?
A friend og mine needs to know - (I use Capture
Shot a wedding and reception Friday, do this once every few years just to
remind me how much hate it. ;-)
Got lazy this time, instead of sync cables all over I just used a small
onboard
bare bulb and set my 4 monolights to slave mode.
BAD idea! Forgot about all the incorrigible point and shooters!
Nice sound effect!
Seriously though, some beautiful shots.
The only niggle is that the 'pop-up' window comes up way too small and has
to
be scrolled or enlarged each time.
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Jens Bladt
Sent: Sunday, May
That sounds about right, Bob.
Bob W wrote:
The USAF killed him because he was about to reveal the secrets of
Nazca, the Bermuda Triangle and Roswell, thus exposing the Illuminati.
The magic bullet was a classified++ miniature fighter jet flown by a
nano-scale pilot developed under the
Thank you, that will be magnificent at about 10 inches by whatever in
print! :-)
G
On May 20, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Toine wrote:
I will print it big once I receive the roll of epson paper.
If you click on the image you see a larger version (1500 px wide).
Lovely. Serene and intense. I wish
On May 20, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
OK Don, say it.
No more weddings,
No more weddings,
No more weddings,
No more weddings,
LOL ... I said that about 1973 and have stuck to it ever since. :-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On May 20, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Is there af PEF plug in for Photoshop that supports K10D files,
please?
A friend og mine needs to know - (I use Capture One 3.7.7, which
supports
the K10D PEF files).
For Photoshop CS ... Set K10D to RAW/DNG mode and use Camera Raw
v2.4.
Bob W wrote:
martyrs go straight
to heaven and enjoy the company of 77 virgins;
The big suprise about that one is that they will all be GOP
card-carrying, gun toting nuns.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Boris,
Did you try from a more perpendicular point of view? It is what my mind demands
when looking at it.
(maybe it wasn't even possible)
- Mensaje original
De: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net; PAW Project Discussions [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
...this is starting to look really bad:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=23297829
(Pentax corporate news, for those who do not care)
¡Descubre una nueva forma de obtener
Yup, as of about 10.00 today, and planning to see you
tomorrow evening!
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/5/07, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'll have my wife's MacBook along (rather than my
HP),
and of course you are welcome to use its burner.
Excellent, thanks Rick.
On 5/20/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob W wrote:
martyrs go straight
to heaven and enjoy the company of 77 virgins;
The big suprise about that one is that they will all be GOP
card-carrying, gun toting nuns.
You mean something like this?
In a message dated 5/20/2007 1:54:24 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...this is starting to look really bad:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=23297829
(Pentax corporate news, for those who do not care)
===
Read the article, it
On 20/5/07, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yup, as of about 10.00 today, and planning to see you
tomorrow evening!
Excellent. Call on the landline - I should be home about 6pm.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Bob Blakely wrote:
Too much self stimulation will cause you to go blind!
Where are my dark glasses?
Reminds me of a joke - guy goes into to his optician. He finally gets
called by the doctor into his office. Doc tells the guy he has to stop
masturbating. Patient asks very worried, Am I
Thanks a lot, Godfrey and George.
I'll pass on your helpful answers at once :-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Godfrey
DiGiorgi
Sendt: 20.
One minor clarification:
For this workflow:
For Photoshop CS ... Set K10D to RAW/DNG mode and use Camera Raw
v2.4. Or capture in RAW/PEF mode, use DNG Converter to convert them
to DNG format, and then use Camera Raw v2.4.
You must use DNG Converter v3.7. The DNG files it outputs can be used
Thanks Marnie, but the poster refer to a 'Nikkei report', not to the one linked.
The Nikkei report include a few more details than the FT report:
Do you also refer to this Nikkei report?
I am afraid I am too lazy to read all those financial articles. English is not
my first language and an
martyrs go straight
to heaven and enjoy the company of 77 virgins;
The big suprise about that one is that they will all be GOP
card-carrying, gun toting nuns.
You mean something like this?
http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry/nuns.jpg
They may have some opposition:
Digital Image Studio wrote:
If any of you are willing to indulge me by performing similar tests
(timing doesn't have to be too accurate) and posting your results
either public or private (along with a very basic system outline,
OS/CPU/RAM/Network) that would be much appreciated. My system
In a message dated 5/20/2007 2:56:28 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Marnie, but the poster refer to a 'Nikkei report', not to the one
linked.
The Nikkei report include a few more details than the FT report:
Do you also refer to this Nikkei report?
I am
Yes, and also one of my favorite little editing programs, Paint Shop Pro XI
and up (Corel) now supports the K10D as well as K100D, K110D and all manner
of *ist via a free upgrade.
Regards,
Bob...
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there af PEF plug in for
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/business/20070516TDY08004.htm
Yet another article that takes even a different slant.
Take your choice.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored.
Thanks again Marnie.
So, personally, I feel it is too soon to be an alarmist.
Now, after May 24th, maybe you can be then. ;-)
So it seems than my 'moratorium' about buying Pentax equipment should last at
least 3 days more...
;-)
Time to go to bed.
- Mensaje original
De: [EMAIL
On 21/05/07, Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rob -
My results -
70 gig WD Raptor SATA Drive - 12 seconds to save, 15 to load.
250 gig WD SATA - 20 seconds to save, 20 seconds to load.
120 gig Maxtor EIDE drive - 2 minutes to save and 1:45 to load (!)
500 gig WD My Book USB 2.0
I said that in 1977, and have only violated it once. But that was for
my favorite model.
On May 20, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On May 20, 2007, at 11:45 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
OK Don, say it.
No more weddings,
No more weddings,
No more weddings,
No more weddings,
LOL
Yawn...
On May 20, 2007, at 4:37 PM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
...this is starting to look really bad:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=23297829
(Pentax corporate news, for those who do not care)
Which means there won't be any. There are no GOP nuns. They're all
card-carrying liberals.
Paul
On May 20, 2007, at 4:05 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Bob W wrote:
martyrs go straight
to heaven and enjoy the company of 77 virgins;
The big suprise about that one is that they will all be GOP
On 21/05/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yawn...
There's a lot of it going around apparently, Pentax execs have been
asleep at the wheel for some years now.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 5/20/2007 5:51:44 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yawn...
==
I think that's silly. The is the most crucial junction Pentax has ever been
at (since I have been on list anyway, about 5-6 years). It could easily be
bought out and the camera
Hi Rob,
Oxford IDE Device 1 58 p-LUN, 465.76 gig: 17 seconds to save,
thirteen seconds to open
Maxtor OX 7100, 280 gig: 13 seconds to save, 11 seconds to open
I have another of eachof the above.. They seem to perform the same
way. Three are firewire. One is wired internally on a Mac G4 dual
You keep saying that Paul, but if the Penatx camera division goes tit's up
(big if), you'll wake up pretty damn quickly.
Cheers,
Dave
At 08:44 AM 21/05/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yawn...
On May 20, 2007, at 4:37 PM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
...this is starting to look really bad:
On 21/05/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rob,
Oxford IDE Device 1 58 p-LUN, 465.76 gig: 17 seconds to save,
thirteen seconds to open
Maxtor OX 7100, 280 gig: 13 seconds to save, 11 seconds to open
I have another of eachof the above.. They seem to perform the same
way. Three
On May 20, 2007, at 5:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul: yawn
I think that's silly. The is the most crucial junction Pentax has
ever been
at (since I have been on list anyway, about 5-6 years). It could
easily be
bought out and the camera division gotten rid of. Currently, that
David Savage wrote:
You keep saying that Paul, but if the Penatx camera division goes tit's
up
(big if), you'll wake up pretty damn quickly.
I think Paul's points are:
1 - All this stuff is mostly rumor at this point
2 - All the list hand-wringing over it accomplishes nothing,
--
PDML
I'm just tired of all those who spend so much time watching the sky
to see if it's falling. If I were inclined to dump my Pentax gear, I
would do it now. But I'm not going to. It works quite well, thank
you. A yawn is appropriate.
Paul
On May 20, 2007, at 8:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/20/2007 6:33:04 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sure, it's a question mark as to what's going to happen. But I don't
see the point of a bazillion speculative posts about something that I
have no power to affect, and on which I have insufficient,
Exactly. Sell your equipment if you must. Otherwise, relax.
paul
On May 20, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
David Savage wrote:
You keep saying that Paul, but if the Penatx camera division goes
tit's
up
(big if), you'll wake up pretty damn quickly.
I think Paul's points are:
1 -
I shot quite a bit today. I think I have quite a few nice street
pics, but I haven't had time to really study them all. But here are a
few that caught my eye right away.
At the car wash, baby:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5989720size=lg
Posing:
In a message dated 5/20/2007 6:42:15 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm just tired of all those who spend so much time watching the sky
to see if it's falling. If I were inclined to dump my Pentax gear, I
would do it now. But I'm not going to. It works quite well,
On 21/05/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just tired of all those who spend so much time watching the sky
to see if it's falling. If I were inclined to dump my Pentax gear, I
would do it now. But I'm not going to. It works quite well, thank
you. A yawn is appropriate.
It's not
At 09:32 AM 21/05/2007, Mark Roberts wrote:
David Savage wrote:
You keep saying that Paul, but if the Penatx camera division goes tit's
up
(big if), you'll wake up pretty damn quickly.
I think Paul's points are:
1 - All this stuff is mostly rumor at this point
2 - All the list hand-wringing
Digital Image Studio wrote:
Thanks for doing that, in the main your results pretty much accord
with mine, though the speed of your Maxtor is bit of a mystery. Maybe
your Secondry contoller isn't set to DMA mode? In the Device manager
under the IDE ATA/ATAPI controllers tab check the Advanced
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5989890
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
No a yawn is appropriate, because it's a conversation based on
misinformation. Let's wait until we have some real information. Then
we can wring our hands, bail, or do whatever is appropriate. But why
speculate based on what is apparently partial truths mixed with a lot
of BS.
Paul
On May
In a message dated 5/20/2007 7:25:15 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No a yawn is appropriate, because it's a conversation based on
misinformation. Let's wait until we have some real information. Then
we can wring our hands, bail, or do whatever is appropriate. But
On May 20, 2007, at 7:00 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
It's not really, this is a conversation about Pentax on a Pentax
discussion list. Try to exercise just a little empathy, granted
Pentax's future is not entirely clear at the moment. However consider
for just a moment that some others
On 21/05/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to me the only thing we have to discuss is when to have the
party and whether to wear black or white. ;-)
Seems to me the only thing I don't like is being told what to discuss.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio
Subject: Re: Don't want to sound too alarmist but...
Seems to me the only thing I don't like is being told what to discuss.
You probably wouldn't like being told to wear a little pink tutu.
WW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Like the car wash catch. Candid with good energy. All interesting
shots.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot quite a bit today. I think I have quite a few nice street
pics, but I haven't had time to really study them all. But here are a
few that caught my eye right
Way up here in the northern hemisphere, spring has arrived (finally)
in full glory. I've been basking in the gorgeous smells that these
blossoms release, and they are inspiring to photograph. Here's one
you might enjoy:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/2007/05/20/spring-blossoms/
K10D,
...I'd rather be a Girl Scout cookie?
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5989890
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 21/05/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You probably wouldn't like being told to wear a little pink tutu.
WW
I'm generally pretty flexible.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO
At 11:02 AM 21/05/2007, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio
Subject: Re: Don't want to sound too alarmist but...
Seems to me the only thing I don't like is being told what to discuss.
You probably wouldn't like being told to wear a little pink tutu.
I only wear my pink tutu on special occasions. That makes it special:-).
Paul
On May 20, 2007, at 11:11 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 21/05/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You probably wouldn't like being told to wear a little pink tutu.
WW
I'm generally pretty flexible.
--
Uncertainty is distracting. Unknown vagrant possibilities unsettling.
All brought on by honest care and concern. Speculation is the natural
course.
We shouldn't be surprised.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 20, 2007, at 7:00 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
It's
On May 20, 2007, at 11:09 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
...I'd rather be a Girl Scout cookie?
Jack
Each to his own, Jack :-))
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5989890
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
