On Jun 7, 2007, at 3:44 AM, graywolf wrote:
The thing is rated at 30 pages a minute. You will have noted that
it only printed 10 pages a minute above. Three reasons for that: 1.
duplex is a lot slower than one sided as the paper path for
printing the second side is a lot longer than it
On Jun 7, 2007, at 4:38 AM, John Francis wrote:
As a satisfied user, I can recommend panix.com.
The only time *any* mail has been filtered was during one
of the most prolific email virus floods, which could easily
fill your mailbox with tens of megabytes of messages.
Panix implemented a
On 7/6/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
P.S. - hey, Cotty. I got Landis' email addy, too! So there.
Brian will be jealous!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 6/6/07, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.alphoto.com/images/helen.jpg
taken Saturday morning at GFM.
Doug, you don't know what this pic does to me ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/06/06 Wed PM 09:55:10 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - recovering files with Linux
Looked. It's too late now, I read the rest and I'm just very, very, pissed.
Vista certainly seems to have great potential
On 2007-06-07, at 04:23, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Uh, yeah it sold for way to high a price. Good to see that Pentax
gear is still drawing large dollars. But I don't understand what that
has to do with a high-res MF camera
That's not good so far, at least for newcomers who are still building
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/06/07 Thu AM 03:05:22 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Portrait of Helen
On Jun 6, 2007, at 10:22 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Okay, if there's a lady in there, I totally missed her. Far too small
an
I like the compositions, particularly the last two. But I'm not keen
on the high contrast and subsequent lack of shadow detail.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 1:46 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Three pictures from Wednesday's explorations in a new site ...
High-res MF cameras aren't part of current Pentax reality.
This is.
At 10:00 PM 6/6/2007, you wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:23:53 -0400
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: who cares about 22mp
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 07/06/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, I do seem to recall reference to Photoshop temp files not being
deleted and accumulating on Windows systems, I think it was on
Photo.net.
PS CS creates a temp file per session (on the nominated drive, I'm
Hi.
I like all the three pictures.
I can see some details in shadows in the last two, and I think a
lighter background with more details would be distracting.
Being a little perfectionist, I would point that halos on the
fishies. I don't know if it's due processing or if it was there when
the
On 6/6/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
On 6/6/07, Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice gallery, Dave - Doug looks like you swiped his beer or something
If it were only that.
LOL
Dave
Dave - nice gallery! I remember when you took
After reading the excellent reports published already, there's not much
to add really. So here's a few random thoughts, in chronological order...
I really don't like bad turbulence - on a flight. I think I'd rather
have bad turbulence of the 'I've eaten too much' kind any day.
Fortunately
Maybe someone kept him up all night.:-)
Good shot Cory. The 50-200 seems to handle a tele very well. I'll have
to try my 1.4
Dave
On 6/6/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like he's pissed!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/7/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/6/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
P.S. - hey, Cotty. I got Landis' email addy, too! So there.
Brian will be jealous!
i have it to.:-)
Dave
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 6/7/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reading the excellent reports published already, there's not much
to add really. So here's a few random thoughts, in chronological order...
My son wants to come along, and that
would be fine, as he's 13, and so am I :-)
Sorry! Pictures!
On 7/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
i have it to.:-)
I've got Helen's :-P
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Didn't get to shoot as much as I would have liked, due to official
responsibilities, but I'll be making more photo-specific trips there in
the coming year due to a project listguy Doug and I are undertaking.
But here are some snaps I threw together with Web Album Generator:
Nice pics and report. Thanks for sharing them.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After reading the excellent reports published already, there's not much
to add really. So here's a few random thoughts, in chronological order...
I really
Some nice ones. I especially like the sun shining through the fog.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Didn't get to shoot as much as I would have liked, due to official
responsibilities, but I'll be making more photo-specific trips
On 07/06/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked my system: It's Camera Raw that creates cache (not
temp) files of about 4.3 meg each On my system they're in
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application
Data\Adobe\CameraRaw\Cache and I haven't found any way to change
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: housekeeping
I just checked my system: It's Camera Raw that creates cache (not
temp) files of about 4.3 meg each On my system they're in
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application
Data\Adobe\CameraRaw\Cache and I
Some great shots Mark. I like the sunset tree and Doug, in that order.:-)
Dave
On 6/7/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't get to shoot as much as I would have liked, due to official
responsibilities, but I'll be making more photo-specific trips there in
the coming year due to a
Nice Bill.
Good background
Dave
On 6/6/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well done.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: A Flower Picture
I shot this in my back yard last evening with the K10, A100mm/2.8 Macro and
Good shot Wendy. Good to see someone was working whist we played on a
mountain..:-)
Dave
On 6/6/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard
Subject: PESO: Teo
aka another dog pic
This past weekend while everybody was whooping it up at GFM,
Fills you with a vague sense of disappointment
Cotty wrote:
On 6/6/07, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.alphoto.com/images/helen.jpg
taken Saturday morning at GFM.
Doug, you don't know what this pic does to me ;-)
--
All dogs have four legs; my cat has
I don't think Brian has any reason to be jealous, e-mail? Feh. She
probably has an extra e-mail to give out to guys she might want to talk
to but might want to ignore. Now a phone number, if she wants to hear
his voice again, (and is willing to risk getting a stalker), that should
make Brian
Back when the US was prosecuting Microsoft for monopolistic practices US
Gov. requirements were that contractors, suppliers and agencies were to
use some flavor of Unix. Unfortunately after that episode was finished
all was forgiven. On top of that I'd bet just about every country in
the
On 6/6/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The dog appears under exposed on my calibrated monitor.
I'd probably crop out the white post @ the top.
The FA 300mm f4.5 is one of my most used lenses.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/80001413
Looking back on the
On 6/7/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think Brian has any reason to be jealous, e-mail? Feh. She
probably has an extra e-mail to give out to guys she might want to talk
to but might want to ignore. Now a phone number, if she wants to hear
his voice again, (and is willing
On 6/6/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/80001413
Beautiful. Great action. Kinda funny how the dog isn't looking where
it is going...
It is really. It's looking where it's going next. The handler is on
the side the dog is turning towards.
This is
lovely shot, Bill. With imperfections and all. :-)
Jostein
2007/6/7, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I shot this in my back yard last evening with the K10, A100mm/2.8 Macro and
the FGZ-540 flash.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/columbine1.html
Enjoy
William Robb
--
Doesn't matter to me anymore. Files are recovered, Ubuntu is installed, I can
print over the network, and Lightzone can open PEFs from the K10. Life is good
without Billy and the gang.
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com/
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
--
That's pretty! We have a yellow Columbine that started blooming profusely
after you left. Fifteen or more blooms on it, all open at the same time,
right next to a deep royal purple Clematis.
Must try to take some macro shots this weekend.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The halo is diffusion caused by the water.
I like #2 best, but I think the contrast is too hard in all of them.
Looks like you've used contrast settings to subdue reflections in the
water surface.
Jostein
2007/6/7, Cassio Vogel Dorneles [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi.
I like all the three pictures.
GRIN!
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Cotty wrote:
After reading the excellent reports published already, there's not much
to add really. So here's a few random thoughts, in
Nice job. Especially on the pasture shot and the Calloway Peak vista.
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: GFM 2007: My Gallery
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:21:54 -0400 (EDT)
Didn't get
On Jun 7, 2007, at 6:54 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
Not a big deal except that I have my computer set up to use the C
drive
for the operating system *only*. These cache files just increase the
size of my system back-up and, of course, the time required to
make the
back-up.
I have
Nice collection of shots both scenic and people. Kinda plasticky though. ;-)
Tom C.
Sorry! Pictures!
http://homepage.mac.com/cottycam/PhotoAlbum6.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 22 MPix digital MF under 1$
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 10:33:56 +1000
On 07/06/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you just imagine the
In a message dated 6/6/2007 2:14:35 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 6/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Anyway, this is where I live...
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/wc.htm
Comments welcome.
Nice shot Marnie. Love the
In a message dated 6/6/2007 2:56:48 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
The problem is that the advancing wave of houses is
the subject, but they don't stand out in the photo.
Especially in #3, they lose to the mountains and
dramatic sky.
Nice pix, but they aren't
From the Astronomy Picture of the Day website, a great example of
multiple exposure techniques:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070607.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Great story and great pix, Cotty.
Thanks.
-Brendan
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After reading the excellent reports published
already, there's not much
to add really. So here's a few random thoughts, in
chronological order...
I really don't like bad turbulence - on a flight. I
William Robb wrote:
From: Mark Roberts
I just checked my system: It's Camera Raw that creates cache (not
temp) files of about 4.3 meg each On my system they're in
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application
Data\Adobe\CameraRaw\Cache and I haven't found any way to change the
In a message dated 6/7/2007 6:31:04 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Didn't get to shoot as much as I would have liked, due to official
responsibilities, but I'll be making more photo-specific trips there in
the coming year due to a project listguy Doug and I are
In a message dated 6/7/2007 5:02:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry! Pictures!
http://homepage.mac.com/cottycam/PhotoAlbum6.html
--
Cheers,
Cotty
==
Good report. Nice gallery with some great people shots. Thanks for sharing.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
From: SpaceWeather.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Night-Shining Clouds Sighted over EuropeDate: Thu, 07 Jun 2007
11:59:30 -0500
Space Weather News for June 7, 2007
http://spaceweather.com
NIGHT-SHINING CLOUDS: Last night a vivid display of electric-blue
noctilucent clouds (NLCs) appeared over
Much enjoyed your report - pics and text - so I've left it all in this
reply as I never delete send messages
and I'll be able to read it again later :) bookmarked the pics.
It was great to see ya and meet your old school chum I wonder what
there is about Ohio -
two of my high school buds
In a message dated 6/6/2007 12:54:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, another quick one. Maybe this could be more saturated, but the dry
grass really does get light, light in the sun. I probably won't use this
unless
I don't have
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: housekeeping
Thanks Bill!
(I hadn't thought of checking in *Bridge* for that.)
Glad I can still be of some use from time to time
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Last night I went up to a hill again. This time I found one with a great
view, more than 180 degrees.
I am thinking this has potential (for my project) if I can get the BW
conversion right. The clouds also look crooked, although the horizon is not,
so I
am thinking of cutting them out
On 7/6/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Didn't get to shoot as much as I would have liked, due to official
responsibilities, but I'll be making more photo-specific trips there in
the coming year due to a project listguy Doug and I are undertaking.
But here are some snaps I threw
Little imagination? I thing Mr Gates has the same imagination as The Brain,
Tomorrow, I am taking over the universe. But even then he is not as strange
as Mr I take open source operating systems, clean them up a bit and sue anyone
who copies it Jobs.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Well, maybe I should give that a try and find out...
OK printing 11 copies of a page, one side only, and timing from when the first
one hit the tray to the last one hitting the tray (10 copies with nothing else
being done) was just under 20 second which is 30+ pages per minute. So they
were
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last night I went up to a hill again. This time I found one with a great
view, more than 180 degrees.
I am thinking this has potential (for my project) if I can get the BW
conversion right. The clouds also look crooked, although the horizon is not,
so I
am
In a message dated 6/6/2007 10:53:57 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Three pictures from Wednesday's explorations in a new site ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/25b.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/25c.htm
A related question. How can one regenerate the thumbnails displayed in
Bridge? I'm on CS2.
It seems (not sure) that several times when I've opened Bridge and looked at
a folder that was still being copied to, from the camera CF, that it loses
it's mind and does not generate all the
Isn't that sweet!
She just sent me an email a couple of days ago.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
David J Brooks wrote:
On 6/7/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/6/07, Scott
Cotty wrote:
On 7/6/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Didn't get to shoot as much as I would have liked, due to official
responsibilities, but I'll be making more photo-specific trips there in
the coming year due to a project listguy Doug and I are undertaking.
But here are some
In a message dated 6/7/2007 11:56:32 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I like your Walnut Creek much better but the two buildings are so
ugly that it might do for the visual pollution PUG
gallery :) :)
What project is it? I think overall, though, the image is kinda
I like this in color too. Wish Lightroom would get here for my BW
conversions, but have to pick out some shots to show tonight at class.
Again from the top of the hill. I think this shows nicely how houses here
can be built right up to an open space boundary. Except, from high up you
Ugly buildings and sun angle haze (suggesting air pollution) may fit
well in your project.
I do think that you may not be able to completely overcome the time of
day haze and its detail cloaking effect.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last night I went up to a hill again. This time I found
Organizing my photos from GFM I found a shot on the memory card that I
took about a week earlier when I was in Columbus, Ohio for the
Photoshop seminar:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I tried a 3 shot pano last night, on the Mac, and used the auto stitch
in CS. The three photos were all shot in M mode and the exposures look
the same across the board, except when i stitch, i get 2 distinct
lines at about 40 degrees or so coming from the top middle and out to
the far sides of the
In a message dated 6/7/2007 12:07:15 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ugly buildings and sun angle haze (suggesting air pollution) may fit
well in your project.
I do think that you may not be able to completely overcome the time of
day haze and its detail cloaking effect.
Good graphic shot, geometry,and composition.
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO unrelated to that place in North Carolina
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:09:13 -0400 (EDT)
Organizing
Enjoyed your ramblings and the photos. Good to meet you also.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GFM - Report and pics
After reading the excellent reports published already, there's not much
to add really. So here's a few random thoughts, in
On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this in color too. Wish Lightroom would get here for my BW
conversions, but have to pick out some shots to show tonight at
class.
Why don't you just go to the Adobe website, download the Lightroom
free trial and then register
Beautiful tones and composition in that one, Mark!
Godfrey
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Organizing my photos from GFM I found a shot on the memory card that I
took about a week earlier when I was in Columbus, Ohio for the
Photoshop seminar:
David J Brooks wrote:
I tried a 3 shot pano last night, on the Mac, and used the auto stitch
in CS. The three photos were all shot in M mode and the exposures look
the same across the board, except when i stitch, i get 2 distinct
lines at about 40 degrees or so coming from the top middle and out
Set Bridge to use a distributed cache.
Quit Bridge, go to the directory you want to have it reprocess,
delete the two files it makes ...
Adobe Bridge Cache.bc
Adobe Bridge Cache.bct
... then restart Bridge. It will reprocess the folder in its entirety.
Otherwise, when you have the Folders
On Jun 7, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
... I found myself using the 43mm Limited much more than I have
before - I
think it was my most used lens of the weekend. The more I use it the
more I like it.
My DA21 and FA43 are the two lenses that are getting the most use
with the
On 7/6/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
I notice both our Image-Stabilization/Shake-Reduction systems
worked well!
yeah but you were walking in faith and I wasn't ;-))
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 7/6/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nope. It's the new 10-17 fisheye zoom. Really fun and much more useful
than I expected. In places like those mountains you can hide the
fisheye distortion pretty well.
Wow - nice lens. Remember I sold Albano Garcia's 17/4 for him, musty be
Cotty wrote:
On 7/6/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
I notice both our Image-Stabilization/Shake-Reduction systems
worked well!
yeah but you were walking in faith and I wasn't ;-))
No more than with predictive AF and autoexposure.
Extensive tells me they work and the indicator
In a message dated 6/7/2007 12:48:43 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why don't you just go to the Adobe website, download the Lightroom
free trial and then register it when your box copy arrives? It is
exactly the same. You'd have it in ten minutes.
On 7/6/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Organizing my photos from GFM I found a shot on the memory card that I
took about a week earlier when I was in Columbus, Ohio for the
Photoshop seminar:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
Love the shadows mate. Great pic.
--
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Dave I use Panoramamaker can recommend it.
Oh yeah. That's the one I use as well. :)
My 22 x 36 GFM print was done with Panorama Maker 3.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PS CS1 Photomerge
David J Brooks wrote:
I tried a 3 shot pano last night,
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
Beautiful tones and composition in that one, Mark!
Thanks! A bit of Photoshopping involved: Perspective correction and the
usual levels/curves/etc. to get the tonality roughly
Dave I use Panoramamaker can recommend it.
Very easy to use with excellent results, for me.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PS CS1 Photomerge
David J Brooks wrote:
I tried a 3 shot pano last night, on the Mac, and used the
Thanks. I couldn't get the Refresh command to do anything at all.
I selected the Purge Central Cache command, and it decided it needed to
automatically regenerate the thumbnails.
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6060740
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6060712size=lg
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
CS3 photomerge should work fine. I use panoramafactory and ptgui.
Panoramafactory is very easy to use and includes tools for finetuning
the result. If you want total control you need ptgui.
On 6/7/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried a 3 shot pano last night, on the Mac, and used
I like it.
The side lighting really adds to an already good capture.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO unrelated to that place in North Carolina
Organizing my photos from GFM I found a shot on the memory card that I
took about a
Excellent. A great concept, well executed.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6060712size=lg
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Still not quite what I want, but getting closer.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/atron.htm
That's it for today, and probably the next few days. Thanks for bearing
with.
Comments welcome.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Warning: I am now
Well done.
A very minor nit is the proximity of the LH tree branch to the LH edge. Give
it some more room if you can.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Another Tree On The Hill
Still not quite what I want, but getting closer.
A different take on a common subject. I especially like the new green growth
with the old green.
A second image I see in this one is obtained by totally cropping out the
reeds in the lower RH corner - a very minimalist image.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL
Yes, I expect that a color version would tend to de-homogenize the
trees and result in a bit more interest.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this in color too. Wish Lightroom would get here for my BW
conversions, but have to pick out some shots to show tonight at
class.
Again
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this in color too. Wish Lightroom would get here for my
BW conversions
Have you tried the BW-Plus plug-in for Photoshop? It's free and very
useful.
http://www.cybia.co.uk/bwplus.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Anyone would looked at this before, and has the time, might look at it
again.
Still working on it, has some oversharpened bits, but see if you like this
better...
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/cities.htm
Thanks, Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 6/7/2007 2:12:32 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I expect that a color version would tend to de-homogenize the
trees and result in a bit more interest.
Jack
Problem is getting it contrasty enough without being too. Still working on
Like it, largely due to the composition.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still not quite what I want, but getting closer.
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/atron.htm
That's it for today, and probably the next few days. Thanks for
bearing
with.
Comments welcome.
Good eye Tom - well seen captured.
Really conveys old.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 4:45 PM
Subject: PESO - Bottles of Yesteryear
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6060712size=lg
Tom
That's actually what I meant. Certainly, use the haze to make your
point. I gather you also feel as I do that even if you wanted to, the
haze may be difficult to overcome and in addition, I see no reason for
you to fight it.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/7/2007 12:07:15
In a message dated 6/7/2007 2:09:46 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well done.
A very minor nit is the proximity of the LH tree branch to the LH edge. Give
it some more room if you can.
Kenneth Waller
===
Okay, I cropped it so I could. Thanks, Ken.
In a message dated 6/7/2007 2:23:24 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's actually what I meant. Certainly, use the haze to make your
point. I gather you also feel as I do that even if you wanted to, the
haze may be difficult to overcome and in addition, I see no reason
In a message dated 6/7/2007 2:19:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have you tried the BW-Plus plug-in for Photoshop? It's free and very
useful.
http://www.cybia.co.uk/bwplus.htm
==
Thanks, I have CS (1) and that is for 2 or 3, otherwise I would. I've tried.
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
