Bruce Dayton wrote:
Taken at the beach at Pt. Reyes - The sun was near setting and caused
the soft glow depicted.
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 123mm
ISO 800, 1/3000 sec @ f/4.5, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/ptreyes_0097.htm
Bruce, you should do a series for a calendar - these
$599 after rebate isn't cheap enough? The K10D's price has been in freefall for
the last couple of months.
-Adam
Rebekah wrote:
Hopefully a new camera will drive down the price of the K10 :)
But this 'I want FF' thing is really out of proportion IMO.
What's wrong with dreaming of FF?
On Oct 19, 2007, at 7:04 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
So here's one from a couple of years ago:
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7d504802.htm
ist-D and 43 Limited.
Adjustments in Photoshop for color/levels/curves, but the
impressionistic effect is caused by photographing the reflection
On Oct 19, 2007, at 8:48 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Interesting question.
Is it a real analog pen or a digital one?
I use a simple, cheap Wacom pen. I have made a PSD file with a
signature ...
That wouldn't count as a real signed work in my book ...
The gallery folks I work with are in
Maybe it is how my brain is wired, but I see it as a reflection -
rather than impressionistic. So I keep wanting to see it as shot -
upside down. As presented it feels upside down to me. It is a nice
reflection.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, October 19, 2007, 7:04:03 AM, you wrote:
MR So
Jens Bladt wrote:
Interesting question.
Is it a real analog pen or a digital one?
I use a simple, cheap Wacom pen. I have made a PSD file with a signature
mask, to drag and drop into any image:
http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/482801832/in/set-72157600172610993/
Jens Bladt
That wouldn't count as
Hopefully a new camera will drive down the price of the K10 :)
But this 'I want FF' thing is really out of proportion IMO.
What's wrong with dreaming of FF?
rg2
On 10/19/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feels right, Paul.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It wouldn't be logical
On 10/19/07, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's wrong with dreaming of FF?
rg2
Dreaming? It was only a dream?
--
Best regards,
Alex Sarbu
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Please, ring it daily!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 09:52
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
If I may ring
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Right clicked images find there way home
Nope, does not work in the BBPro web pages.
I tried it in several locations in the head, and i still get the save
picture as pop ups.
It shouldn't matter where it goes in
Two disclaimers:
1. Not Pentax
2. Not Art. Just aaaw
..and one warning: Adorable kitten!
With all that out of the way... http://charles.robinsontwins.org/
photos/2007/best/pages/page_79.html
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis, MN
In fact, more likely than a full frame camera and a line of lenses is the 645D.
Lenses for that camera are already in production. If Pentax wants to go pro,
that seems to be the only logical way to do it.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It
I like it.
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/19/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So here's one from a couple of years ago:
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7d504802.htm
ist-D and 43 Limited.
Adjustments in Photoshop for color/levels/curves, but the
impressionistic effect is caused by
It wouldn't be logical from a marketing point of view to introduce a camera
that can't use the lenses that you've just introduced. The DA* 60-250 hasn't
even seen the light of day yet. Plus, most of the full frame lenses seem to
have been discontinued. I suspect that the only ones being sold
Great concept. Intriguing. Took me a few seconds to realize what I was looking
at.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So here's one from a couple of years ago:
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7d504802.htm
ist-D and 43
No.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Starfighters Co. (was: Completely and totally OT: Politics)
I thought it was half of a P-82 Twin Mustang, but my guess
So here's one from a couple of years ago:
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7d504802.htm
ist-D and 43 Limited.
Adjustments in Photoshop for color/levels/curves, but the
impressionistic effect is caused by photographing the reflection of the
chateau in the water.
Oh yeah... I also used
Oh, possibly. But the point is that two megapixels *alone* won't do
anything - there has to be more to it. Lower noise would count :)
I don't expect Pentax to go full-frame yet but I certainly hope they
don't try to cram more than 10 MP into an APS-C sensor. A 1.2-1.3 crop
would suit me
Comments on the T34 from somewhere in my memory suggest it was better
because of wider treads. It was more able to negotiate soft ground.
(maybe from 900 Days - the Seige of Leningrad) (The Russians built
those tanks while the Germans shelled the factory!)
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/19/07, mike
I expect that the sensor size will be restricted to the limits of the image
circle on the DA* lenses. I doubt that's bigger than 1.3. From what Adam has
told us about the newest sensors, 12 megapixels with good noise characteristics
might well be possible at 1.5.
Paul
-- Original
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:44:23 +0200, Dario Bonazza wrote
Can Not Tell
Dario
Thanks Dario.
John
The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed and may
Good luck then. That is a great price. BH did have the 16-50 last I looked.
Probably Wednesday or Tuesday of this week. My problem with Adorama was with a
Sandisk card that was defective from day one. They insisted I return it to the
manufacturer, who made me jump through hoops.
Paul
Z10, SFX and SF7 have that 3rd Digital pin too AFAICT
2007/10/19, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Bob Blakely
I'm curious. What can the flash know of rear curtain sync timing save
that given it by the camera's shutter? If nothing, what's to set on
the flash? What difference could it
I thought it was half of a P-82 Twin Mustang, but my guess its one of
those Cavalier Mustangs (Mustang II? Piper Enforcer?) ...
On 10/19/07, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Civilianised P51 Mustang?
Nope. You have another chance, as I wrote WWII when it's actually
In front of Cameras, and giving an award, that's the difference.
-Adam
Bob Sullivan wrote:
I don't know what the difference between pictures with President Bush
at the Residence and Bush plus Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the House) in
Congress really are, perhaps some diplomatic distinction? In
Mark Roberts wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
William Robb wrote:
From: Mark Roberts
Knowledgeable sources have mentioned that Pentax have been working on
their own design CMOS sensor since before the Samsung deal.
Rumors say it's 14 megapixels.
It had better be at least that. Two more megapixies
mike wilson wrote:
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/18 Thu PM 08:14:36 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
Well, Canada did buy a bunch of F-104's. Too bad ours were low-level nuke
ground attack birds (Absolutely no
Look again Paul, I just went to BH to check their current price and find
that at this moment they do not have the DA* 16-50 on their site either. I
am getting the 16-50 and for some reason Adorama did not receive any of the
first shipment - I have it on order for US$750 which they apparently will
Adam Maas wrote:
William Robb wrote:
From: Mark Roberts
Knowledgeable sources have mentioned that Pentax have been working on
their own design CMOS sensor since before the Samsung deal.
Rumors say it's 14 megapixels.
It had better be at least that. Two more megapixies aisn't going to
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:28:21 +0200, Dario Bonazza wrote
That officially starts the IKBCNT game at PDML, repeating the big
success of the K10D pre-launch time.
I'm afraid I smell some stink here too ;-)
Dario
IKBCNT? I Know But...?
John
That officially starts the IKBCNT game at PDML, repeating the big success of
the K10D pre-launch time.
I'm afraid I smell some stink here too ;-)
Dario
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007
On 10/18/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: WTB DA 50-200
I'v never made it past step 2:-)
You shouldn't have bought that Super Program from me.
It would have come to you with enablement cooties.
Humm, that was
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/19 Fri AM 09:05:02 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
On 19.10.2007, at 02:36 , Adam Maas wrote:
That depends, if those extra 2MP come with a
Being slightly unnerved by the OP's comments I checked on my earlier emailed
order accepted on May 10th at a considerably lower price than BH's at the
time and still so now.
I received a prompt reply that the order was still current and was told that
they are expecting supplies in the near
Stan,
What if Adorama people really did send you an e-mail, but as usual it
might have included some promotional material that was recognized as
spam and that e-mail never reached you?
I am not trying to advocate, merely thinking out loud here.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
mike wilson wrote:
Civilianised P51 Mustang?
Nope. You have another chance, as I wrote WWII when it's actually post-WWII.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
Err... let's better say post-WWII.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 12:01 PM
Subject: Starfighters Co. (was: Completely and totally OT: Politics)
mike wilson wrote:
From:
mike wilson wrote:
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/18 Thu PM 08:14:36 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
Well, Canada did buy a bunch of F-104's. Too bad ours were low-level nuke
ground attack birds (Absolutely
It'll need more than that to create the horizontal and diagonal lines
to match the existing vertical patterns ;))
Peter
That depends, if those extra 2MP come with a stop or two better noise,
they just might.
I can only confirm it won't be just 2 MP of difference ;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/18 Thu PM 08:14:26 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
On 10/18/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we talk about the Lockheed F-104 Starfighter? Please Bob? There's a
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/18 Thu PM 08:14:36 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
Well, Canada did buy a bunch of F-104's. Too bad ours were low-level nuke
ground attack birds (Absolutely no air-to-air
On 19.10.2007, at 02:36 , Adam Maas wrote:
That depends, if those extra 2MP come with a stop or two better noise,
they just might.
I can only confirm it won't be just 2 MP of difference ;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/18 Thu PM 06:16:54 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
The arms of Krupp is not entirely correct. The invasion of France was
carried out using a large number of training
Two things:
1. Unlike your own town, Newcastle is one word. 8-)
2. How so we get signed copies?
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/18 Thu PM 06:15:04 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: FS Friday - coals to New Castle , I know - but please checkt this
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Presidents should simply commit hara-kiri when their approval rating
falls below 20% and make way for the next joker. GWB could be a
leader and show the way ... History would them remember him well.
I think you just issued an invitation to the
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
GWB met with the DL in the White House, but no photo ops so we
wouldn't upset the Chinese. ???
Pics and video here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7048284.stm
--
Cheers,
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Beach Scene
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:27:28 -0400
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @
colostomy bag?
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,,,or douchebag.
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/20/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dirtbag shouldn't be overlooked.
Jack
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah,
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
The Canadians. They walk among us. William Shatner. Michael J. Fox.
Monty Hall. Mike Meyers. Alex Trebek. All of them Canadians. All of
them here.
You missed Celine Dion.
BTW, you
All of them jokes or comics. Well except for Fox who qualifies as a
tragic figure now. (The sad part is the most admirable of your examples
is a game show host). Yep I've set it up come on and hit the hanger...
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Oct 19, 2007, at 12:04, Bob Blakely wrote:
From:
Definitely a cutie.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Visitor in the office
Two disclaimers:
1. Not Pentax
2. Not Art. Just aaaw
..and one warning: Adorable kitten!
With all that out of
Tom Wrote:
Are you sure those lenses are in production? Designed maybe, but I would
think otherwise in the same status as the 645D. They're not making lenses
for a camera that's not on the production line.
I'm not expecting it or holding my breath, but to me it makes *more sense*
to produce a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It wouldn't be logical from a marketing point of view to introduce a
camera that can't use the lenses that you've just introduced.
Of course. You'll note I mentioned that I *didn't* expect the new
camera to be FF. I'm *hoping* it's more than APS-C.
The DA* 60-250
David J Brooks wrote:
Cute cat.
Is'nt this why Mike Johnson left the list. Oh that and flowers.
LOL
Dave
No, it was to avoid sending me his book.
On 10/19/07, Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two disclaimers:
1. Not Pentax
2. Not Art. Just aaaw
..and one
San Jose is in Canada? You learn sooo many new things here.
Must tell Google Earth.
P. J. Alling wrote:
He's in Canada, they'll farm it out to the Mounties.
mike wilson wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Presidents should simply commit hara-kiri when their
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It wouldn't be logical from a marketing point of view to introduce a camera
that can't use the lenses that you've just introduced.
The Nikon mentioned *can* use the smaller format lenses; it will
automatically crop the picture to the appropriate size, as far as I
It looks a lot like the front end of a P51 but a lot of planes noses
looked a lot like that.
Dario Bonazza wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/18 Thu PM 08:14:36 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT:
It's enough to make even me buy one. :-) A large number of PS compacts on
the market cost 1/2 to 2/3's of that.
Tom C.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 10:06:18AM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what Adam has told us about the newest sensors, 12
megapixels with good noise characteristics might well be possible
at 1.5.
Could be. But every so often I look at what Nikon's getting from 12
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 19, 2007, at 8:48 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Interesting question.
Is it a real analog pen or a digital one?
I use a simple, cheap Wacom pen. I have made a PSD file with a
signature ...
That wouldn't count as a real signed work in my book ...
The
mike wilson wrote:
Two things:
1. Unlike your own town, Newcastle is one word. 8-)
I can rationalize that (aside from being miss typo, second only to
Brooks in that area)
I once had an honorable mention in one of the New York Magazine's weekly
contests
with the theme of slightly changing old
On 19/10/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
I thought Cotty was the only one able to bestow shitbag status on a list
member. I'm feeling that my exclusive club is becoming over run with
pseudo-shitbags.
The pecking order is
1. Shitbag
2. Fartbag
3. Sleazebag.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Dave -
Try using JAlbum as your gallery generator - the one Scott is using for
the PUG gallery. Right clicking on the image only gets you the link to
previous, index page or next image. At least, that's the way it
works w/Firefox 2.0.0.8.
-p
David J Brooks wrote:
Nope, does not work in
Very nice, and a great idea.
Dave
On 10/19/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So here's one from a couple of years ago:
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7d504802.htm
ist-D and 43 Limited.
Adjustments in Photoshop for color/levels/curves, but the
impressionistic effect is
Christian wrote:
I thought Cotty was the only one able to bestow shitbag status on a
list
member. I'm feeling that my exclusive club is becoming over run with
pseudo-shitbags.
I can *aspire* to shitbagness.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/19 Fri PM 12:48:10 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Starfighters Co.
Doug Franklin wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote:
And now, let's discuss WWII planes with a quiz for warbird buffs out there.
Please take a
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/19 Fri PM 01:17:23 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
Comments on the T34 from somewhere in my memory suggest it was better
because of wider treads. It was more able to
Doug Franklin wrote:
Dario Bonazza wrote:
And now, let's discuss WWII planes with a quiz for warbird buffs out there.
Please take a look at www.dariobonazza.com/public/KGP03047.jpg
What's that?
Nose of an early P-51 Mustang? Or maybe a Hawker Hurricane?
Neither. Although it's almost
Dario Bonazza wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/10/18 Thu PM 08:14:36 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
Well, Canada did buy a bunch of F-104's. Too bad ours were low-level nuke
ground
While the trails off the back of the jet are somewhat interesting,
this one just doesn't grab me at all. The placement of the jet by the
trees seems a bit strange.
--
Bruce
Thursday, October 18, 2007, 4:57:25 PM, you wrote:
GD Been a slow week, dealing with business and bronchitis (yuck), so
From: John Francis
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 07:25:12PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
From: pnstenquist
I went on a Saab press junket to Sweden in 1981. Saab engineers
demonstrated the Viggens short takeoff distance. It was truly amazing
how quickly it got off the ground. The Swedish
Kenneth Waller wrote:
I don't see the magenta - either the trhee of us are really going blind
or Ken needs a trip to
the eye doctor ;)
I won't deny a trip to the eye doctors would probably help my close distance
focus, but I've never had an issue with color.
Kenneth Waller
What he said.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Haven't posted a PESO in a while...
Maybe it is how my brain is wired, but I see it as a reflection -
rather than impressionistic. So I keep wanting to see
645 bodies and lenses are gone from the Pentaximaging web site. If the
645d does return it will be a large scale New Product introduction.
Something I don't think Pentax has the chutzpah to carry off. Nor do I
think they have the production capacity to meet any kind of real demand
for new 645
Taken at the beach at Pt. Reyes - The sun was near setting and caused
the soft glow depicted.
Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 123mm
ISO 800, 1/3000 sec @ f/4.5, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/ptreyes_0097.htm
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 10/18/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI
My photo
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/53154137
His version
http://www.cafepress.com/belgians.114253288
Damn cheek
Wendy
I'm sorry, but I just don't see it.
I'm sure more than one person has taken photos of
I don't know what the difference between pictures with President Bush
at the Residence and Bush plus Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the House) in
Congress really are, perhaps some diplomatic distinction? In any
case, the Dali Lama deserves the honor and recognition.
He's a gentle and brave fellow. He
May 10th? Last time I looked BH had both DA* lenses in stock. I had
some problems with Adorama regarding returns of defective
merchandise. I steer clear of them.
Paul
On Oct 19, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Rod Connan wrote:
Being slightly unnerved by the OP's comments I checked on my
earlier
On 10/18/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding from the other drivers is that it will be
through Chicago and up 39.
In that case you'll be able to get some real street photography VBG
Slow enough to not have to pan.LOL
Dave
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
Hi!
It is Friday here. So here goes.
I am offering for sale and/or trade the following items:
1. Single element soft lens
2. An assortment of Cokin-A system filters (orange, tobacco, etc)
Please let me know if you're interested.
Thanks.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 10/20/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also, why is everyone assuming that the 645D will be so much cheaper
than the current products on the market?
Cheers,
Dave
Have to say it:
Also, why is everyone assuming that the 645D will be so much
Can Not Tell
Dario
- Original Message -
From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: hints about sensor for next camera(s)
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:28:21 +0200, Dario
Yes I experienced the same.
I use it as a normal despite the fact it is more a small tele.
It is defenitely a very nice (and very cheap) portrait Tele.
Kinda like a 77mm limited on a 35mm I suppose (never tried a limited,
unfortunately so the comparison is pure theory).
--
Thibault Massart aka
On 10/20/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just can't see Hoya management, more pragmatic than the former
Pentax mgmt., going down a risky road with a 645D.
Given the recent news that the 645D project, while not scrapped, was
'no longer a priority for Pentax.' (Hiroshi Onoda, European
Nothing wrong with dreaming of FF, if that's what you want. But realistically,
it ain't going to happen. Not now.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hopefully a new camera will drive down the price of the K10 :)
But this 'I want FF'
Doesn't look very sharp to me ;-)
Mark Roberts wrote:
So here's one from a couple of years ago:
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7d504802.htm
ist-D and 43 Limited.
Adjustments in Photoshop for color/levels/curves, but the
impressionistic effect is caused by photographing the
Not exactly free fall, you can find it for $599, (after rebate), but a
lot of places are still selling it for 999 or more.
Adam Maas wrote:
$599 after rebate isn't cheap enough? The K10D's price has been in freefall
for the last couple of months.
-Adam
Rebekah wrote:
Hopefully a new
I sort of like it, but I'd either like to see the figure to the right
just a little larger, or not there at all. Now how to arrange that I'll
leave as an exercise for the photographer.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Taken at the beach at Pt. Reyes - The sun was near setting and caused
the soft glow
You missed Celine Dion.
No. You both missed the..
Twain, as in Shania !
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Completely and totally OT: Politics
- Original Message -
From: Charles Robinson
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So what makes you think Pentax can do any better than Hassleblad,
Maymia, Leaf etc?
REPLY:
Because the companies listed above a backyard businesses in size compared to
Pentax and have to make all their earnings from selling
On 19/10/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sounds like a good prognostication to me.
Sorta like a wet dream.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
So is the Cotty cam.
Sandy Harris wrote:
On 10/20/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any camera on the market that has a 1.2/1.3 crop at the moment? It
does not make sense to me to shoot for somewhere between APS-C and FF. You
wouldn't *need* new lenses of course...
201 - 292 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
