On Dec 3, 2010, at 6:28 PM, Phil Northeast wrote:
> My Macquarie describes the dish and who it was named after, but there is no
> attribution of origin.
Must have been playing it safe if they didn't know for sure. Or maybe they
have some expat kiwis on their staff and couldn't settle the argum
On Dec 2, 2010, at 7:59 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Larry,
> The first 2 or 3 loose sight of the mushrooms.
> The 4th and 5th look good again.
> What I like best about the mushrooms you've shown
> is the translucent nature of the mushrooms and
> the 3 dimensional fullness they had.
Thanks for the
My Macquarie describes the dish and who it was named after, but there is
no attribution of origin.
On 3/12/10 4:04 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 17:48 +1300, "David Mann"
wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11897482
Sorry just had to mention :)
Oxford English
On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:32 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:06 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>> The only advantage is it will work with the manual focus lenses you have now
>> and will work with AF lenses in the future without having to buy another
>> converter. It just has the contact
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 17:48 +1300, "David Mann"
wrote:
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11897482
>
> Sorry just had to mention :)
Oxford English Dictionary
Pshaw
I bet the Macquarie Dictionary gets it right.
:-)>
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele"
Subject: Re: OT: excellent online print experience
Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "Ann
Marked: Asahi Opt. Co. Japan, Takumar 1:2.8 105mm, 1:4 100mm, 49Ø
1.5 inchs deep X 2.4 inches diameter.
In excellent condition.
Make offer
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-11897482
Sorry just had to mention :)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "Ann Sanfedele"
Subject: Re: OT: excellent online print experience
Ken - bay photo is who does the work for smugmug sales ... I'm using
them exclusively now and offering buye
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele"
Subject: Re: OT: excellent online print experience
Ken - bay photo is who does the work for smugmug sales ... I'm using them
exclusively now and offering buyers luster, glossy
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Ann Sanfedele"
Subject: Re: My book is up on blurb
Ken Waller wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote
Cotty wrote:
Bu
No not at all, the 2XS-A (and all -A) convertor has the A contacts.
- Peter
-Original Message-
From: Eric Weir
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 2:02 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Teleconverters?
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:06 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
The only advantage is it w
Beautiful blossoms! Unfortunately, that black background area is very
distracting, the pedals peeking in on the left edge should be cloned out and
the fuchsia color in the upper left corner eliminated. The black background
area would be a tough edit, but the image is worthy of a significant eff
Larry,
The first 2 or 3 loose sight of the mushrooms.
The 4th and 5th look good again.
What I like best about the mushrooms you've shown
is the translucent nature of the mushrooms and
the 3 dimensional fullness they had.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I was
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:06 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> The only advantage is it will work with the manual focus lenses you have now
> and will work with AF lenses in the future without having to buy another
> converter. It just has the contacts the AF lenses will need if you ever do
> decide to try
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:45:24 +0200
Boris Liberman wrote:
> Well done, sir... Now, please choose your new nick name - Scotty,
> Chief O'Brien or Geordi...
> >
> > http://picasaweb.google.com/pdml.live/Peso#5545404485618435346
thanks for looking Boris, appreciate it. :)
--
regards, subash
--
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I had lunch today with a friend who claimed not to be photogenic. I pulled
> my camera out of my fanny pack and snapped this to prove her wrong:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5227961798/
>
> Her house has quite a few interesting featur
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:24 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Another resource that comes to mind is to drop by a used bookstore and
> hunt up a copy of the old classic "Basic Photography" published by
> Focal Press in the 1960s. Invaluable information at whatever level of
> depth you can tolerate.
I pi
Wow, that is a good price.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
> Howdy, folks,
>
> Several people have been asking around about photo quality LCD monitors. I
> just got an ad "flyer" from PCMall (brother of MacMall) offering the HP
> ZR24w 1920 x 1200 S-IPS LCD monitors for US$3
On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Miserere wrote:
> Yeah, s unphotogenic :-\
Send that to her, Larry.
--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA USA
eew...@bellsouth.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.ne
Every dog, no matter how small, still thinks he's a wolf. Nice shot.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Judging from the direction of the dog's sight, we may be speaking of a
> rather poor guard ;-).
>
> And that would be a picture by Frank we all know and appreciate for the
Howdy, folks,
Several people have been asking around about photo quality LCD monitors.
I just got an ad "flyer" from PCMall (brother of MacMall) offering the
HP ZR24w 1920 x 1200 S-IPS LCD monitors for US$399.99. Thought some of
you might be interested:
http://www.pcmall.com/p/product~dpno
- EX1/TL500: $349
- NX100: $449
- NX10: $499
Details here:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/12/02/discount-codes-for-samsung-cameras-at-adorama/
Usual EtL affiliate account caveats apply.
Cheers,
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Qu
Yeah, s unphotogenic :-\
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
On 2 December 2010 20:50, Larry Colen wrote:
> I don't *only* photograph mushrooms. Yesterday as I was leaving Costco I
> noti
http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=main&webtag=djm1963&entry=29
Comments, Suggestions, Criticisms and Abuse are All Welcome.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.ne
Great shots, and great story, Larry!
And, I now have a ready explanation for when people inevitably ask me,
"Why are you always carrying a camera around?"
-- Walt
On 12/2/2010 7:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I don't *only* photograph mushrooms. Yesterday as I was leaving Costco I
noticed the
I don't *only* photograph mushrooms. Yesterday as I was leaving Costco I
noticed the light on the trees in the Costco parking lot in contrast with the
tower at Granite Rock Construction across the street.
Safety before all else:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5227340089/in/set-7215762539
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:33 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> Thanks for that info, Godders.
>
> I just about betcha five bucks the local used book store has a copy of "Basic
> Photography" on the cheap, and have already bookmarked the photo.net page.
> I'll send them an email telling them to go to hel
Thanks for that info, Godders.
I just about betcha five bucks the local used book store has a copy of
"Basic Photography" on the cheap, and have already bookmarked the
photo.net page. I'll send them an email telling them to go to hell as
soon as I finish reading it all. ;-)
-- Walt
On 12
Thanks, Paul.
I'll put those on my Christmas wish list, beginning with "The Camera"
and see what I get.
-- Walt
On 12/2/2010 7:22 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
For a full film education in technical terms, purchase the three Ansel Adams books: :The Camera,"
"The Negative," and "The Print." M
Another resource that comes to mind is to drop by a used bookstore and
hunt up a copy of the old classic "Basic Photography" published by
Focal Press in the 1960s. Invaluable information at whatever level of
depth you can tolerate.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Althou
Although I no longer go there due to the management stupidity and
censorship that I got fed up with,
http://photo.net/learn/making-photographs/ does a reasonable job of
the primary concepts of photography.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Being not particularl
For a full film education in technical terms, purchase the three Ansel Adams
books: :The Camera," "The Negative," and "The Print." Much of what you've
inquired about here will be covered in that first volume. But the other two
will gi you a complete understanding of film and processing. Some of
Yeah, the Dell 2410 is the one I've been eyeing. I don't want to pay
$1K for a monitor, that seems to be the going rate for the NECs. $599
seems more reasonable. For 1K, I might as well get a 27 or 30 inch
model.
Samsung has 24 inch models that are around 300$, but they are 1080
pixels instead
From: Eric Weir
On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:34 AM, eckinator wrote:
> You may want to shop for the Kenko MC7 Pz-Af teleconverter - it is
> optically fairly good with 7 elements and couples all mount contacts
> including SDM and/or power soom. It also comes branded as Bower and
> Soligor. On eBay Germa
On 12/2/2010 6:52 PM, eckinator wrote:
I'm at a bit of a loss for a better
imagebut the general idea is that closing the aperture cuts out the
stray rays so to say
Hmm ... it alleviates photon overcrowding, in a sense.
dang... tell them that after a while it becomes intuitive knowledge
and y
the funnel explanation isn't that bad really - if you look at the
definition of the circle of confusion (sounds kind of like a secret
round table for politicians) on this page
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/depth-of-field.htm (close
the prompt to register for a newsletter) you'll find t
Thanks, Ecke ... that will be helpful down the road, no doubt.
I guess what I'm looking for is a combination of both. Nothing overly
scientific -- like down to the atomic level, or anything.
Maybe if I can explain the way I've grasped the concept of the effect of
aperture size on depth o
It certainly means some new topics in the Biochemistry course.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Miserere wrote:
> Some people will feel let down because of the blogsphere hype that
> preceded the announcement, but I think it's frickin cool what they've
> discovered.
>
> See guys? It's not just the
Roman posted this link a while ago and I find it quite useful for
doing the math. Is it that or are you interested in the underlying
logic?
http://roman.blakout.net/?dof
HTH Ecke
2010/12/3 Walter Gilbert :
> Hi all,
>
> Being not particularly mathematically inclined (to put it very charitably),
>
From: Boris Liberman
I will "pay a long visit" to e-Bay and buy me some goods to try. I
noticed two types of diffusers, by the way:
* one that looks like a plastic cup of some form that probably makes the
light source somewhat bigger and somewhat softer
* one that looks like a screen of variou
> A short photo-essay in diptychs from my trip to Austria and Romania:
> http://www.lukaknezevicstrika.com/gallery.html (click on the
> first slideshow - austria romania)
>
> c&c welcome
that's a great set - I really admire your work, and putting the pairs
together like this has really worked
Hi all,
Being not particularly mathematically inclined (to put it very
charitably), I was wondering if any of you could point me toward a sort
of online idiot's guide to understanding and calculating exposure
values, depth of field, and other basics along those lines. I figure
having at lea
On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
> I've used two TC's: A2X-S and F 1.7X AF,
> both mostly for "macro" (or close-distance) shots.
>
> Here is an example of my first use of the A2x-S (with a zoom - since you
> asked):
> http://www.komkon.org/~igor/PHOTOS/WildAnimalPark/IMGP5086w2.
On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> I've used my Promaster 7-element 2X teleconverter with my 50-200mm kit
> lens to shoot birds and gotten *decent* results as long as the birds
> cooperated and as long as I stayed away from the farthest reaches of the
> lens. Of course,
On Dec 2, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> I currently have the rear convertor A-1.4 X-S, X-1.4X-L and A2.0X-L & have
> used them extensively when needed without any particular issue. The A2.0X-L
> is the least used for me.
>
> They're a great way to extend your 'photo reach' relatively c
On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Nick David Wright wrote:
> By different I didn't mean hard
>
> It can be very very easy though. The V500 is an exceptional scanner
> (especially for the price), and I'm finding it very easy to use. Black
> and white particularly so.
>
> Don't let what anyone els
I think you might be unpleasantly surprised :-D
On 02/12/2010, Boris Liberman wrote:
> On 12/1/2010 10:01 PM, Miserere wrote:
>> Boris,
>>
>> This is the issue:
>>
>> http://shutterfinger.typepad.com/shutterfinger/2010/08/automation-strikes-again.html
>>
>> Igor might want to run a test similar
On Dec 2, 2010, at 5:33 PM, David Parsons wrote:
> You don't join professional organizations to impress clients and
> customers. The ASMP isn't going to throw prospective leads your way,
> that's not what they do. They provide information and organize events
> for members.
>
> Either it's wort
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>> How expensive is it in comparison to a refurbbed 24" iMac?
>
> I'm tired of trying to keep photos and Lightroom catalogs synced between my
> laptop and our desktop; so I'm planning to stick with the laptop, a FireWire
> drive, and a monitor.
>
> I wouldn't put it to use immediately, but I've got my eye on
> a Pentax 2X Teleconverter-A. I know nothing about
> teleconverters. General advice would be welcome as well as
> comments specifically about this one.
>
> I haven't really done any wildlife photography, but it's on
> my agen
Duly noted, and much appreciated.
-- Walt
On 12/2/2010 4:39 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Yes!
Jack
--- On Thu, 12/2/10, Walter Gilbert wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
Subject: Re: Teleconverters?
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 2:36 PM
Speaking of which, do
TC
Yes!
Jack
--- On Thu, 12/2/10, Walter Gilbert wrote:
> From: Walter Gilbert
> Subject: Re: Teleconverters?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 2:36 PM
> Speaking of which, do
> TC's have as noticeable an impact on IQ when
> used on film bodies as they do
Speaking of which, do TC's have as noticeable an impact on IQ when
used on film bodies as they do on DSLRs?
-- Walt
On 12/2/2010 4:28 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 2 December 2010 15:53, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
FWIW, I have refrained from using TCs because
of the simple fact there is a slight loss
You don't join professional organizations to impress clients and
customers. The ASMP isn't going to throw prospective leads your way,
that's not what they do. They provide information and organize events
for members.
Either it's worth it to you or not. It has nothing to do with getting
business
On 2 December 2010 15:53, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
> FWIW, I have refrained from using TCs because
> of the simple fact there is a slight loss in
> resolution and contrast(added flare). Somehow
> prime lenses don't feel right with TCs added on.
>
I stopped using TCs because they're obsolete in the d
I've seen the add and am going to archive this as it answers some questions.
Thanks for posting.
Jack
--- On Thu, 12/2/10, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
> From: kwal...@peoplepc.com
> Subject: OT: excellent online print experience
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, December 2,
Some people will feel let down because of the blogsphere hype that
preceded the announcement, but I think it's frickin cool what they've
discovered.
See guys? It's not just the upcoming full-frame and mirrorless cameras
from Pentax that get people excited:
http://www.cjr.org/the_observatory/close
Same has been true for me, Ken. I've never used anything beyond a 1.4, so have
been conservative and thus conditionally pleased with the results.
Jack
--- On Thu, 12/2/10, Ken Waller wrote:
> From: Ken Waller
> Subject: Re: Teleconverters?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, D
Ken - bay photo is who does the work for smugmug sales ... I'm using
them exclusively now and offering buyers luster, glossy or metalic - but
I haven't looked at any of my stuff printed on the metal yet didn't
realize they were really printed on aluminum. I know one
smugmugger who shows his
Strange finding. They discovered a bacterium that uses arsenic in place of
phosphorus in its DNA. That is somewhat earth-shaking in the biology field, as
no other organism on earth has been able to substitute other elements in DNA.
Jeffery
On Nov 30, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
>
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Thu, 12/2/10, Larry Colen wrote:
> How expensive is it in comparison to a refurbbed 24" iMac?
I'm tired of trying to keep photos and Lightroom catalogs synced between my
laptop and our desktop; so I'm planning to stick with the laptop, a FireWire
drive,
Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: My book is up on blurb
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote
Cotty wrote:
But you're right on t
Yes, those two.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 12:51:19
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: More mushrooms
On Dec 2, 2010, at 6:09 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Larry, I think you're d
On 2010-12-02 16:14, Ken Waller wrote:
When using them is the difference of getting/not getting the image I
want - I use them.
I can't say the loss of resolution and contrast has been an issue for me
in their usage.
Ditto. When I use one, I'm typically adding it to a long lens to get
more re
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "J.C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Teleconverters?
FWIW, I have refrained from using TCs because
of the simple fact there is a slight loss in
resolution and contrast(added flare). Somehow
prime le
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: My book is up on blurb
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote
Cotty wrote:
But you're right on the money with regards
On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
> I'm planning to set up a laptop-based workstation at home. My wife is
> working on a book manuscript, and it's very difficult to get photo editing
> done on the iMac these days.
>
> So, any experience with the 24in ACD to share? It's expensive
Just wanted to share an excellent experience/result with an online service
that I used recently.
I was looking for a unique presentation for a print I wanted to give as a
gift & decided not to go my usual route (home print on an Epson printers &
then mounted/matted/framed by a local framer).
FWIW, I have refrained from using TCs because
of the simple fact there is a slight loss in
resolution and contrast(added flare). Somehow
prime lenses don't feel right with TCs added on.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Join the CD PLAYER & DISC Discussions :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.co
A very engaging image, Boris. Have a wonderful holiday season.
Dan
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Well seen & captured Boris.
>
>> Have a great year end holiday season, everyone!
>
> Same to you fella ;+}
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
--- On Thu, 12/2/10, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Rick
> Womer
> wrote:
> > I'm planning to set up a laptop-based workstation at
> home. My wife is working on a book manuscript, and it's
> very difficult to get photo editing done on the iMac these
> days.
> >
> >
On Dec 2, 2010, at 6:09 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Larry, I think you're developing an unhealthy obsession with these
> much rooms. ;-)
The stump is about five feet in front of my front door. It's hard not to
notice things to photograph on it.
I really was trying to photograph the stum
I've always been of the mindset to use converters from the same maker as the
lens, tho I have never evaluated brand X convertors on brand Y lenses.
I currently have the rear convertor A-1.4 X-S, X-1.4X-L and A2.0X-L & have
used them extensively when needed without any particular issue. The A2.0
Walter Gilbert wrote:
>On 12/2/2010 1:37 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> Ken Waller wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Mark Roberts"
>>>
Cotty wrote:
> But you're right on the money with regards to the puns.
he's shilling...
>>> Bob said pensively.
>>>
>>> When it comes to puns
On 2010-12-02 13:03 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The current model is a 27", not 24", and its cable connects to a Mini
Display Port, which requires a converter box if your laptop doesn't
have a Mini Display Port connection. I don't know much about the 24"
models which preceded them.
the 24 inch is
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
> I'm planning to set up a laptop-based workstation at home. My wife is
> working on a book manuscript, and it's very difficult to get photo editing
> done on the iMac these days.
>
> So, any experience with the 24in ACD to share? It's expensi
One thing to note is that you're not a photo editor or publisher,
Cotty. They're buying services if they're booking me for an
assignment. They're buying goods if they're buying a usage license for
an existing photograph.
Yes, booking an assignment is quite different from selling licensing
for a ph
Even better deal from Amazon, Transcend 16GB Class **10** SDHC Cards for $24.49:
http://tinyurl.com/34y2c5o
Purchase something else for $0.51 and you get free shipping (within the US).
Same URL caveat as before applies to the above.
Cheers,
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
On 12/2/2010 1:37 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
From: "Mark Roberts"
Cotty wrote:
But you're right on the money with regards to the puns.
he's shilling...
Bob said pensively.
When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm
not one to buck the trend.
that makes
Or rather "deal", singular. B&H has a Cyber Thursday (whatever that
is) deal on Transcend 16GB Class 6 SDHC Cards for $26.95 + free
shipping:
http://tinyurl.com/2f5xyvt
Full disclosure: the URL includes EtL's affiliate B&H code, so if
enough of you buy this card today through the above link I mig
Ken Waller wrote:
>From: "Mark Roberts"
>
>> Cotty wrote:
>>
> >> But you're right on the money with regards to the puns.
> >
> > he's shilling...
>
> Bob said pensively.
>
> When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm
> not one to buck the trend.
Igor Roshchin wrote:
>I just noticed that "Best Price Electronics" (aka US1 Camera)
>has the K-5 for $1500, which appears to be $100 below its price at B&H
>and Amazon
>http://bestpriceelectronics.com/bp/product_info.php/pentax-k5-163-megapixel-digital-slr-camera-body-k5-p-20007
>http://tinyurl.co
Well seen & captured Boris.
Have a great year end holiday season, everyone!
Same to you fella ;+}
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Boris PESO #57 - Happy Hannukah
Hi!
http://pentax-ways.blogspot
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: My book is up on blurb
Cotty wrote:
>> But you're right on the money with regards to the puns.
>
> he's shilling...
Bob said pensively.
When it comes to puns, n
On 2010-12-02 11:45 , Rick Womer wrote:
I'm planning to set up a laptop-based workstation at home. My wife is working
on a book manuscript, and it's very difficult to get photo editing done on the
iMac these days.
So, any experience with the 24in ACD to share? It's expensive, but by the time
Good to have you back. We wish you a complete and speedy recovery.
Dan
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
> Thanks Miserere and all. I am back, sorta.
> My operation Monday turned into a bit of a saga. The procedure before mine
> was delayed for 4 hours as they worked to bring
Congratulations!
Dan
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Just noticed that an old PESO of mine, that was also reproduced in the 1st
> PDML book, was included in a gallery of hood ornaments as part of a
> front-page article published today at car enthusiast site Jalopnik.com ..
Thanks, Frank.
I know it's tilted; I liked the way the lines of the station and the
lines of the track converged toward the left. Somehow, it seemed to
enhance the feeling of motion.
I did a different crop, which is more "level" with the station structure:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_
The "L" version sold for more when I bought my "new" 1.4.
Jack
--- On Thu, 12/2/10, paul stenquist wrote:
> From: paul stenquist
> Subject: Re: Teleconverters?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 10:51 AM
> They were the A2X-S and A2X-L. They
> were priced the
On 2010-12-02 09:03 , Igor Roshchin wrote:
For the K-5 droolers:
I just noticed that "Best Price Electronics" (aka US1 Camera)
has the K-5 for $1500, which appears to be $100 below its price at B&H
and Amazon
http://bestpriceelectronics.com/bp/product_info.php/pentax-k5-163-megapixel-digital-slr
They were the A2X-S and A2X-L. They were priced the same when first introduced.
The L versions were less common and sold for more used. The Ls couldn't be used
with every lens that was over 300mm. For example, the rear baffle on the
A400/5.6 precludes their use. Both are excellent optics.
Paul
Thanks for commenting, Boris.
Dan
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> On 12/1/2010 10:09 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> Dan,
>> Makes me want to go for a visit.
>> Regards, Bob S.
>
> I concur. And the deep shadows seem to be in place here no matter how much I
> like to open
I'm planning to set up a laptop-based workstation at home. My wife is working
on a book manuscript, and it's very difficult to get photo editing done on the
iMac these days.
So, any experience with the 24in ACD to share? It's expensive, but by the time
I buy a docking station (which will be o
Thanks, Brian.
The colors caught my eye, but I was also drawn by the contrast with
the USS Constellation, see in the background, together with its
museum.
Perhaps you were expecting a dragon boat like the one in this old can
from a 1966 Spotmatic image:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12
The AX and AL converters were never the same price when I was shopping them in
the late 1990's. At that time the Pentax "L's improved quality and
configuration are provided to accommodate the 300mm and up telephoto lenses."
The exact wording notwithstanding in the absence of any further research
Christine, tanya, wendy - substitute "HUSBAND" and "BOYFRIEND" in
appropriate places -- although none of them will run
on current equipment :-)
ann
Original Message
Subject: tech support question
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 10:57:24 -0500
From: Jacobsmike807
To: ann...@nyc.rr.
Hi!
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/12/peso-2010-58-rokach-house.html
As usual - brutal and honest comments are sought after.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly ab
On 12/2/2010 7:09 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
I've now made a few more changes.
It's horizontally laid out and few more slides removed.
feel free to check it out
luka
Horizontal lay out is good, but I think you took away a bit of a story
by removing some slides. I kind of liked the initia
The A2X-S and A2X-L were originally the same price if I recall. I don't think
the "L" is better glass, just different. It has the long snout to optimize its
use with lenses that have the recessed rear element. That group includes more
than just the *** lenses, and not all of the latter.
Paul
O
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
