knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
It certainly rubs me the wrong way. I just don't know what she's up
to (other than to make money - not that there's anything wrong with
that).
It's late and I'm not so articulate just now. Perhaps I'll sleep on
it and come up with a pithier response tomorrow.
Che
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Supposedly K mount and a K-5 quality sensor:
>
> http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/hot-pentax-k-01-mirrorless-camera-coming-soon/
More...
http://m.techradar.com/news/photography-video-capture/pentax-k-01-mirrorless-camera-revealed-in-feb
Interesting and fascinating. I love the tone and the composition.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 4:04 PM, DagT wrote:
> http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
> K-5, DA70mm, 1/250s, f/11, ISO100.
>
> DagT
> http://ww
Black with yellow leather? The Bumblebee model? I'm in! ;-)
It looks like they leaned toward functionality. Now the problem might
be the other side, i.e., if it's too big not to just buy the DSLR.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Bong Manayon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Steven
On 19/1/12, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Red Rocket is what we call our streetcars. I think the name started
>off as being somewhat derisive, but it stuck and is now used with
>great affection. Here's one under the Queen/Dufferin underpass:
>
>http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.com/
On 1/19/2012 23:38, Kenneth Waller wrote:
What's next? Will she produce B&W images from someones color prints?
Seems wrong to me. she should go out and produce some original work of her own !
I think I'm in this camp too... Remember the film colorization mess a
few years back??
I think
So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
I found it hard to believe. so what is going on here? I think
this guy used a projector to project a photo he took (the first
one I might find sligh
At least it was his own photograph that he painted. This is
interesting because photography, before they discovered silver and
hypo, was simply taking a camera obscura and using it as a tracing
tool.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> So on the Scrabble discuss list last wee
This shot *really* works for me, Frank. I like how much lines dominate
this scene, the motion blur, and the way the blurs and shake make for
a softness that neatly abstractifies [*] this image.
The only suggestion I'd make would be to burn, perhaps blur or
otherwise reduce the contrast of the adve
Hmmm - a techie version of paint by numbers?
-p
On 1/20/2012 7:40 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
I found it hard to believe. so what is going on here?
I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's doing.
-Original Message-
>From: Ann Sanfedele
>Subject: Re: So wrong
>
>
>
>On 1/19/2012 23:38, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>>
>>
>> What's next? Will she produce B&W images from someones color prints?
>>
>> Seems wrong
Like the red color the pedestrian and the two bars across the top of
frame. Everything says color in motion.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:49 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> Red Rocket is what we call our streetcars. ?I think the name started
> off as being somewhat derisive, but it stuck and is now us
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
> doing.
I doubt it. I would assume either she has permission or the copyrights have
expired. She's doing it very publicly. And very well IMO. Quite Obviously, a
lot
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
> Hmmm - a techie version of paint by numbers?
>
> -p
My, the list is judgmental today.
Painting with a projector and a photograph is nothing like painting by numbers.
More accurately, it could be considered a contemporary version of the camer
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
> What say you guys?
I can't really get into it, either. I wrote a bit when I first learned
of his work:
http://scotchtape.ductwhisky.com/2011/06/on-photoreal
Great shot. Good colours and excellent motion to this one.
Dave
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:49 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> Red Rocket is what we call our streetcars. I think the name started
> off as being somewhat derisive, but it stuck and is now used with
> great affection. Here's one under
> > http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/hot-pentax-k-01-mirrorless-camera-coming-soon/
>
> More...
>
> http://m.techradar.com/news/photography-video-capture/pentax-k-01-mirrorless-camera-revealed-in-february--1056080
>
> --
> Bong Manayon
> http://bong.manayon.net
>
If true, does anyone else have a bi
I'd say that it's right up there with cat photos.
Seriously a lot of the same arguments against coloring photos could be made
against photos as art, rather than painting.
Did Dylan get upset when the Byrds or Hendrix did better versions of his songs?
If someone colorized my van when it was parke
I can see a few reasons.
The kx is right on the verge of pocketability, the k5 is slightly too large. A
little smaller and a better shape could make a big difference.
Face recognition on focus
It could be cheaper to build
Manual focus in low light
The k5 doesn't have a lot of gaps in its performan
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>
>> I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
>> doing.
>
>Quite Obviously, a lot of skill and artistic ability is required to achieve
>the
>results she's accomplished.
Nope. It's very
Tom C wrote:
>Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless system
>that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5?
The K5 being discontinued?
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/
From: Bong Manayon
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Supposedly K mount and a K-5 quality sensor:
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/hot-pentax-k-01-mirrorless-camera-coming-soon/
More...
http://m.techradar.com/news/photography-video-capture/pentax-k-01-mirrorless-camer
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Tom C wrote:
>
>> Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless system
>> that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5?
>
> The K5 being discontinued?
If no DSLR upgrade were introduced, that would induce me to sell my gea
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
>>> doing.
>>
>> Quite Obviously, a lot of skill and artistic ability is requir
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>>>
I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
doing.
>>>
>>> Quite Obviously, a lot of s
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> Tom C wrote:
>>
>>> Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless system
>>> that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5?
>>
>> The K5 being discontinued?
>
> If n
On Jan 20, 2012, at 07:55 , Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>
>> I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
>> doing.
>
> I doubt it. I would assume either she has permission or the copyrights have
> expired. She's do
It makes some sense if the new EVIL body is a smaller, lighter body
with K5 innards and this is accompanied by the release of a new DSLR.
The "new line" has a lower end model which is mirrorless and the
higher spec model which is a DSLR. Effectively, this new mirrorless
model is replacing the K-r
No one seems to know if it has a built in EVF, aside from the LCD.
>From what I've seem with other companies, not mentioning the EVF means
that it's not built in and is only an add-on if it exists at all.
OTOH, who knows the nature of this rumor? I always wonder if the
company floats these rumors
What Paul said.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: New Pentax EVIL rumor, with specs
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Tom C wrote:
>
>> Assuming I had a K-5, what w
On 20/1/12, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I can live without the mirror, but without a viewfinder it's no use to me.
I never thought I'd say this but I agree with John Sessoms.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysn
On 20/1/12, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I never thought I'd say this but I agree with John Sessoms.
Mark.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
P
On 20/1/12, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>My, the list is judgmental today.
MARK.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
If Mark included every "I never thought I'd agree with ..." quote there
wouldn't be room in the list for anything else.
On Jan 20, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Cotty wrote:
> On 20/1/12, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> I never thought I'd say this but I agree with John Sessoms.
>
> Mark.
>
> --
I find Bruce's comment bothersome. (Sorry Bruce.) Pentax would never
abandon the SLR format completely, but I'm not so sure about Ricoh. I
hope they would at least run both for a while before completely
converting to mirrorless.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 20/1/12, Cotty
On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>>
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright iss
>I find Bruce's comment bothersome. (Sorry Bruce.) Pentax would never
>abandon the SLR format completely, but I'm not so sure about Ricoh. I
>hope they would at least run both for a while before completely
>converting to mirrorless.
The assumption seems absurd, even for Ricoh.
What seems more a
On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> It makes some sense if the new EVIL body is a smaller, lighter body
> with K5 innards and this is accompanied by the release of a new DSLR.
> The "new line" has a lower end model which is mirrorless and the
> higher spec model which is a DSL
I'm hoping for this. I'd really like to see Pentax try a plastic
version of what Fuji just released (the X Pro 1) with a built in EVF.
I think Fuji is going after the M9, but I don't' think Pentax has the
mojo for that.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 2012, a
On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>>
>>> I don't know, but it would seem there are copyright issues in what she's
>>> doing.
>>
>> Quite Obviously, a lot of skill and artistic ability is requi
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>>
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>
>> I don't know, but it would seem
The very nature of performing arts means that works are often interpreted by
someone other than the writer/composer. The performers are artists in their own
rights. Works are interpreted and presented from the unique perspective of the
performer(s).
The visual arts are such that a finished work
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:05 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>>> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>>
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 10:35 AM, K
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:08 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
> The very nature of performing arts means that works are often interpreted by
> someone other than the writer/composer. The performers are artists in their
> own rights. Works are interpreted and presented from the unique perspective
> From: "Larry Colen, l...@red4est.com (From Droid)"
>
> I can see a few reasons.
> The kx is right on the verge of pocketability, the k5 is slightly too large.
> A little smaller and a better shape could make a big difference.
> Face recognition on focus
> It could be cheaper to build
> Manual f
If there is no mirror, it's pretty hard to have an optical viewfinder.
Unless you are talking about it being a rangefinder (which I don't
see Pentax doing), without a mirror, it's going to be an EVF.
I doubt that Pentax has anything to do with these rumors. People love
to speculate.
On Fri, Jan
>> Tom C wrote:
>>
>>> Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless system
>>> that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5?
>>
>> The K5 being discontinued?
>
> If no DSLR upgrade were introduced, that would induce me to sell my gear and
> go to Nikon.
>
> Paul
I never thou
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:40, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
>
> http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
>
My biggest issue with this is that "shelterisland" isn't a real word!
-Charles
--
Charles
on 2012-01-20 12:45 Steven Desjardins wrote
I find Bruce's comment bothersome. (Sorry Bruce.) Pentax would never
abandon the SLR format completely, but I'm not so sure about Ricoh. I
hope they would at least run both for a while before completely
converting to mirrorless.
in ten years or les
on 2012-01-20 12:53 Collin Brendemuehl wrote
*Make the camera a real computing device* and not just a PC peripheral. That's
my plan. Why won't they listen to me?
that age is upon us, just not in the DSLR realm yet
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listi
Mark Roberts wrote:
>>she replaced all the various grays with color elements of different tonal
>>values.
>>Look at the color detail she created in the Times Square buildings.
>>Not easy by any stretch of the imagination.
>
>Layers. Displacement masks. Blend modes.
That should be displacement
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:54:03AM -0700, Tom C wrote:
>
> If true, does anyone else have a bit of a problem understanding this strategy?
>
> Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless system
> that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5? And likely without
> the weather-
Somehow missed this thread, but just read the interview.
This quote is interesting to me:
"If you look purely at what we're hearing from customers, there's a
lot of demand for longer focal lengths. Something like 300mm f/2.8,
something like that. As far as what's on the road map, it's not
somethin
Where will all this end?
The next thing you know people will be calling sculptures of Brillo
Boxes and screen prints of Campbell's Tomato Soup cans "art"!
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE fr
>
> I'd say that it's right up there with cat photos.
>
Black & white cats painted ginger, perhaps.
> Seriously a lot of the same arguments against coloring photos could be
> made against photos as art, rather than painting.
> Did Dylan get upset when the Byrds or Hendrix did better versions of
On Jan 20, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
>> http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
>
>> What say you guys?
>
> I can't really get into it, either. I wrote a bit when I first learned
> of
Those earlier pics from the work area with the vertical interference line ...
Looking @ the images again ...
the sensor apparently has a number of frozen/hot (red/green) pixels.
Well, we took back the K7 and got a new Kr.
Today I took it out to the same area.
No pixel issues. No vertical interfe
I missed it too the first time around, thanks for the heads up. I had to
search for the link. If anyone else missed it
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2012/01/12/imaging-resource-interviewjohn-carlson-pentax
On Jan 20, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> Somehow missed this thread, bu
on 2012-01-20 06:40 Ann Sanfedele wrote
So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
hyperrealism is an established movement in painting; the artists do usually
work from photos, but i don't
>
> > http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-
> steve-mills/
>
> > What say you guys?
>
> I can't really get into it, either. I wrote a bit when I first learned
> of his work:
>
> http://scotchtape.ductwhisky.com/2011/06/on-photorealism.html
>
all modern art is an
On 1/20/2012 15:13, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
Agreed. No one has to like it or feel good about it. But it's not wrong or
immoral.
Just to be picky -- immoral and wrong are not always the same thing
right?
ann:-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/l
> So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
>
> http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-
> steve-mills/
>
> I found it hard to believe. so what is going on here? I think
> this guy used a projector to project a photo he took (the first
> one I
On 1/20/2012 15:36, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:40, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
My biggest issue with this is that "shelterisland"
> On 1/20/2012 15:13, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> > >
> > Agreed. No one has to like it or feel good about it. But it's not
> wrong or immoral.
> >
> >>
>
> Just to be picky -- immoral and wrong are not always the same thing
> right?
>
> ann:-)
>
Immoral is where the Royal Family go for Scottis
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
>
> On 1/20/2012 15:13, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> >
>> Agreed. No one has to like it or feel good about it. But it's not wrong or
>> immoral.
>>
>>>
>
> Just to be picky -- immoral and wrong are not always the same thing
> right?
I see
on 2012-01-20 13:36 Charles Robinson wrote
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:40, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
So on the Scrabble discuss list last week someone posted this link
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2012/01/hyper-realistic-paintings-by-steve-mills/
My biggest issue with this is that "shelterisland" isn
Interesting. I like what he said about long, fast glass for the APS-C cameras.
And based on that interview, it certainly doesn't sound like DSLRs are going
away.
Paul
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I missed it too the first time around, thanks for the heads up. I had to
>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Bob W wrote:
>> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
>> Darren Addy
>
>> I'm all for competition (and a lower priced product) but some of the
>> COMMENTS on this page give me reason to pause...
>>
>> http://www.dpreview.com/news/2
On 1/20/2012 15:52, Bob W wrote:
I'd say that it's right up there with cat photos.
Black& white cats painted ginger, perhaps.
ohoh, you've been looking at graphic arts gallery.
http://annsan.smugmug.com/Graphic-Design/Anns-design-work/3346046_7HfWvF/1/1158685402_HS4MX/Medium
But it is n
MARK!
cheers,
frank, just kidding, but I couldn't resist.
:-)
--- Original Message ---
From: Larry Colen
Sent: January 20, 2012 1/20/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: New Pentax EVIL rumor, with specs
If Mark included every "I never thought I'd agree with ..." quote there
woul
Too funny, Bob. Thanks! I'm at a meeting waiting for it to start, so thanks
for the giggle. Cheers, Christine
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:25 PM, "Bob W" wrote:
>> On 1/20/2012 15:13, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>> Agreed. No one has to like it or feel good about it. But it's not
>> wrong or immo
Listed the flash on ebay
http://www.ebay.com/itm/190629059884?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
ebay was annoying me trying to get me to add item specifics for this
but their item specific thingy said this was for a CANON... however, it
stayed up.
still have sundry filters fro
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
>
> On 1/20/2012 15:52, Bob W wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd say that it's right up there with cat photos.
>>>
>>
>> Black& white cats painted ginger, perhaps.
>
> ohoh, you've been looking at graphic arts gallery.
> http://annsan.smugmug.com/Graphic
On 1/20/2012 16:25, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 1/20/2012 15:13, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Agreed. No one has to like it or feel good about it. But it's not wrong or
immoral.
Just to be picky -- immoral and wrong are not always the same t
I guess I agree with Paul, but I have to say it would break my heart to see the
K5 to go away with no upgrade to follow. I'd probably use my Pentax gear until
I couldn't any more, then switch. Cheers, Christine
On Jan 20, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 2012, at 1
I have Corel to thank for becoming a huge fan of Framemaker.
My wife and I were fully invested Ventura Publisher users until not
too long after Corel bought it. They screwed it into the ground. We
settled on Framemaker after that and still use it to this day. I'm
very unhappy that Adobe discontinu
Let's hope for this one:
http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/i-hope-marc-newson-can-make-a-better-pentax-k-design-than-that-one/
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
> I guess I agree with Paul, but I have to say it would break my heart to see
> the K5 to go away with no upgrade
If you want words for Scrabble play, use Dave's posts as a reference! :-)
> There is also apiece I havent read yet
Or your own… :-)
On Jan 20, 2012, at 13:21 , Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> On 1/20/2012 15:36, Charles Robinson wrote:
>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:40, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>>
>>> So on
The same source reported, on March 30 2011, that the Pentax K-mount APS-C
mirrorless would be released in the summer of 2011.
On Jan 20, 2012, at 5:44 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Let's hope for this one:
>
> http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/i-hope-marc-newson-can-make-a-better-pentax-k-design
Like she said.
I have a mirrorless camera - the PEN EP-L2. Like most compact cameras, it is
designed to be held at arms length in front of you while you try to obtain
sharp focus on an LCD screen made unreadable by glare. And/or by presbyopia. It
has a clunky add-on EVF which works reasonable w
On 1/20/2012 18:04, Joseph McAllister wrote:
If you want words for Scrabble play, use Dave's posts as a reference! :-)
There is also apiece I havent read yet
Or your own… :-)
yeahyeahyeah :-)
ann
On Jan 20, 2012, at 13:21 , Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 1/20/2012 15:36, Charles Robinso
I suspect Paul knows this, but in case other people don't...
A few years ago, a physicist Charles Falco in collaboration
with David Hockney (artist and art historian), has demonstrated
that a lot of renaissance artists were using lenses and mirrors
to project images - so that they can paint so
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Igor Roshchin
> I suspect Paul knows this, but in case other people don't...
>
> A few years ago, a physicist Charles Falco in collaboration
> with David Hockney (artist and art historian), has demonstrated
> that a lot o
Well that's depressing.
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Let's hope for this one:
>
> http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/i-hope-marc-newson-can-make-a-better-pentax-k-design-than-that-one/
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Christine Aguila
> wrote:
>> I guess I agr
Hi all,
just a short one to let you know that I'm still alive.
I have just ordered a K-r. Not for myself but for MIchael who had been
using my K10D since I got the K-7. Unfortunately the K10D has developed
an electronics problem and after the OK button stopped working months
ago (Pentax quoted a
On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just a short one to let you know that I'm still alive.
>
> I have just ordered a K-r. Not for myself but for MIchael who had been
> using my K10D since I got the K-7.
Very cool. The K-r is really a sweet little camera.
W
Thanks. I missed it too. Cheers , Christine
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I missed it too the first time around, thanks for the heads up. I had to
> search for the link. If anyone else missed it
>
> http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2012/01/12/imaging-resource-inter
You have to do better than that, Christine. To which depressing thing
are you referring? ;-)
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
> Well that's depressing.
>
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>
>> Let's hope for this one:
>>
>> http://www.mirrorles
Good to hear, but there's nothing like a good despair to clear the nasal
passages:-). Cheers, Christine
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Interesting. I like what he said about long, fast glass for the APS-C
> cameras. And based on that interview, it certainly doesn't s
A few lines from one of my fave movies, Burn After Reading, come to
mind here ...
CIA Superior: What did we learn, Palmer?
CIA Officer: I don't know, sir.
CIA Superior: I don't fuckin' know either. I guess we learned not to do it again
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>
Well, I think that's a butt ugly camera. Cheers, Christine :-)
On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:08 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> You have to do better than that, Christine. To which depressing thing
> are you referring? ;-)
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Christine Aguila
> wrote:
>> Well tha
I have 3 sticks of 2 gigabyte memory which was displaced when I upgraded
my PC's ram last weekend.
They are labelled Kingston KVR1333D3E9S/2G - 6 gigs total of matched
RAM. Matched as in bought together - same production run etc. 9 chips on
each stick.
They work fine. It does not look like
From: Paul Stenquist
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Tom C wrote:
Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless system
that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5?
The K5 being discontinued?
If no DSLR upgrade were introduced, that would induce me to
From: Steven Desjardins
It makes some sense if the new EVIL body is a smaller, lighter body
with K5 innards and this is accompanied by the release of a new DSLR.
The "new line" has a lower end model which is mirrorless and the
higher spec model which is a DSLR. Effectively, this new mirrorless
The "specs" look like it's going to be one of those hold it out at arms
length & squint at the little TV screen on the back cameras.
From: David Parsons
If there is no mirror, it's pretty hard to have an optical viewfinder.
Unless you are talking about it being a rangefinder (which I don't
s
From: Darren Addy
Somehow missed this thread, but just read the interview.
Haven't seen it in the digests prior to your reply.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and f
I've been on this list for about 11 or 12 years now and I've seen variations of
this thread more times than I can count. They all start with a rumour. Then we
wail and gnash our teeth:
"Pentax is abandoning the enthusiast market!"
"I'll have to sell or get rid of my valueless Pentax gear and bu
On 2012-01-20 22:22, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been on this list for about 11 or 12 years now and I've seen variations of
this thread more times than I can count. They all start with a rumour. Then we
wail and gnash our teeth:
If nothing else, a couple of years of mandatory militar
Heh, that's why I respond to any rumor with: I'll believe it when I see it.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
> On 2012-01-20 22:22, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I've been on this list for about 11 or 12 years now and I've seen
>> variations of this thread more time
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
> Well, I think that's a butt ugly camera. Cheers, Christine :-)
Naw.
Now THIS is a butt ugly camera:
http://www.pacificrimcamera.com/pp/omega120/omega120.htm
Obligatory Pentax content: One man's opinion -
http://theclick.us/2012/01/butt-
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
