My photo workshop group gathered for our annual summer party last Sunday. I
carried the Polaroid SX-70 and two packs of Impossible Project film to see what
I could get with it. There's something just beautiful to my eye about the
photos this camera makes, despite all the defects and weirdnesses
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Attila, I can only see the preview; nothing happens when I double-click on it.
Just click it once, and you will see keyboard shortcuts at the bottom
(M is for maximize). Original size is 1024x880.
Based only on that...
Depends on the bird.
Obviously cormorant plumage is the most expensive and the heaviest, pound for
pound, in the world because of its very high beauty content.
It is also remarkable that if you drop a cormorant off the Tower of Pisa in a
vacuum, it follows a rapid perpendicular arc towards
Must be Garmin's handiwork, if my GPS is anything to go by (which it isn't,
since those are the kind of directions it gives).
B
On 11 Sep 2013, at 02:09, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
On my way to work earlier this week:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17524170size=lg
Looks like crop here marks for street maintenance:)
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
Must be Garmin's handiwork, if my GPS is anything to go by (which it isn't,
since those are the kind of directions it gives).
B
On 11 Sep 2013, at 02:09, Rick Womer
a pound of feathers, gold only has twelve troy oz per pound.
On 9/10/2013 9:08 PM, John wrote:
Which weighs more a pound of gold or a pound of feathers?
On 9/10/2013 7:35 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:48:42PM -0400, John wrote:
So much more affordable when you think of it
I will say that a while back the one brand that had my attention was
Sony. Pentax made a huge leap when they adopted Sony Exmor sensors,
and Sony gives itself an edge in the sensor department. They also had
fairly reasonably priced full frame options and the internal shake
reduction that I
Close. In Pennsylvania anyone wanting to dig has to call 811, an agency that
maintains maps of all below-ground utilities. When digging is contemplated
they come out and mark the streets and sidewalks with a different color for
each utility.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
-
Or Apple Maps.
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 3:19 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Which way?
Must be Garmin's handiwork, if my GPS is anything to go by
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
... I'm not a big fan of composing on the LCD and have yet to
actually try an electronic viewfinder.
You may be very pleasantly surprised on both counts here. I don't
easily recall when I last used my K-5 and I totally
Bummer...
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 10, 2013, at 11:30 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Was running to catch a bus. My tripod swung around and got caught in
between my legs. Down I went tumbling with the camera slamming into
the asphalt. I had my A35-105/3.5 mounted. Its now bent
Sh*t happens. Its just a lens.A somewhat inexpensive one at that. I
had grown rather attached to that one thoughseeing if I can score
one on ebay or keh right now.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Paul Sorenson pentax1...@gmail.com wrote:
Bummer...
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 10, 2013,
We were in Oklahoma City in 1995 and recall the feelings after the Murrah
bombing. On 9/11 we watched and could only hold each other afterwards. We
felt that same numbness again.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
... I'm not a big fan of composing on the LCD and have yet to
actually try an electronic viewfinder.
Well, silly Darren, one composes with an LCD or electronic viewfinder
exactly the same way one does with an optical
Dave,
Most everybody in the northern US are growing peppers as annuals.
And growing chili peppers specifically because the supermarkets don't 'HOT'.
We have a local mexican market that may, but as a rule the big chains don't.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:28 AM, David Mann
Years ago somebody bought a digital PS with a digital viewfinder.
I was instantly turned off by the lines on the screen.
Tell me it's better now???
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
Nice. Can you say 'Nighthawks'.
You should get a bigger display image.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Philip Northeast
rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Pentax K5 DA 21mm Limited - ISO 3200 - f3.2 and 1/20sec (hand held)
Yes, they do have a unique look about them.
I can't tell how much is the camera/film and how much is your POV.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi
godfreydigio...@me.com wrote:
My photo workshop group gathered for our annual summer party last Sunday. I
carried
Still a bad link...
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:45 PM, John Coyle jco...@iinet.net.au wrote:
The manipulated shot works much better, IMHO.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of CollinB
Sent: Tuesday, 10 September
Far better, Bob. Far better.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Years ago somebody bought a digital PS with a digital viewfinder.
I was instantly turned off by the lines on the screen.
Tell me it's better now???
Regards, Bob S.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Years ago somebody bought a digital PS with a digital viewfinder.
I was instantly turned off by the lines on the screen.
Tell me it's better now???
Regards, Bob S.
Hi Bob,
You answered part of it yourself. :) This is today, that was years
ago. No lines.
I was mildly blown away by the IQ of
Well not really looking through... looking at.
Tom C.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
Years ago somebody bought a digital PS with a digital viewfinder.
I was instantly turned off by the lines on the screen.
Tell me it's better now???
Regards, Bob S.
Hi Bob,
Inviting and intriguing.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Philip Northeast
rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Pentax K5 DA 21mm Limited - ISO 3200 - f3.2 and 1/20sec (hand held)
Thank you Cotty! and Bob!
Godfrey
On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/sets/72157635478987878/
DELIGHTFUL set of pics! Love the square format and the endearing
softness. Really really nice job Godders
--
PDML
On 10/9/13, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
My photo workshop group gathered for our annual summer party last
Sunday. I carried the Polaroid SX-70 and two packs of Impossible Project
film to see what I could get with it. There's something just beautiful
to my eye about the photos
I used a Nikon Coolpix 5700 with an EVF, for evidence photography, years ago
and in my opinion it was a great camera for static image capture but wasn't one
to use for any sort of dynamic capture - there was a noticeable time delay
between pushing the shutter release and the actual image
Ken, can it be that you're confusing the shutter release lag with EVF
operation. With my Ricoh GXR and (manual focus) Leica M-module,
everything is quite excellent in this regard. Both the viewfinder is
very easy to use and focusing by b/w focus assist is easy. The shutter
release is very fast,
The modern EVF cameras have reduced lag to almost non-existent.
My older EVF cameras - Sony F707/F717/F828/R1, Olympus 8080WZ, Panasonic FZ10,
Minolta A2 - were fairly pathetic on viewfinder responsiveness and resolution.
I used the viewfinder primarily as a targeting device. I remember the
I like the effect; well done indeed.
It reminds me of the Hawaiian sunsets colored by vog from the
volcanoes on the Big Island.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
There has been some
Thanks for looking and for the comments Bob S., Bob W., Bruce, Chris,
Darren Dan!
I'm no Butterfly expert (my job is Curator of Dragonflies and Small
Orders, which is essentially the river insects and lacewings), but
John I think the leaf mimics would probably move once a caterpillar
started
On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:14 AM, Kenneth Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
I used a Nikon Coolpix 5700 with an EVF, for evidence photography, years ago
and in my opinion it was a great camera for static image capture but wasn't
one to use for any sort of dynamic capture - there was a noticeable
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013, Boris Liberman wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
... I'm not a big fan of composing on the LCD and have yet to
actually try an electronic viewfinder.
You may be very pleasantly surprised on both counts here. I don't
And just like that someone from pentaxforums messages me with a good
copy for a very good price. Waiting to see some pictures of it. :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
You guys are making me think I should go down to the store and take a look at
these new EVF's. Another question I have is in regards to sports shooting -
any lag as you pan the camera following the action?
--
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 11, 2013, at 8:31 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013, Darren Addy wrote:
But if you asked me the brand that appears most likely to be my 2nd
choice, should it ever come to that, I would say Sony. Their NEX
cameras are pretty clearly the best mirrorless option out there,
IQ-wise, but I'm not a big fan of composing on the LCD
Ben,
I forgot to mention how effective those pictures of the butterflies on
the plain white background were. Not a choice I thought I'd like.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Ben Price ben.wills.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for looking and for the comments Bob S., Bob W.,
Hi Marnie,
Was browsing and came across this interesting little article. Caveat: it
was written over 9 months ago so I don't know if updated firmware is
available.
http://photomojomike.com/2012/11/21/fujifilm-x-e1-first-impressions/
I'm V interested in the X-E1, hence my post.
--
Cheers,
Very well done, Bruce! Composition is just great. Exposure is dramatic and
without appearing pushed.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
To: pdml@pdml.net pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8:05 AM
Subject: PESO - Smoke Effects
Bruce wrote:
You guys are making me think I should go down to the store and take a look at
these new EVF's. Another question I have is in regards to sports shooting -
any lag as you pan the camera following the action?
I don't shoot sports but I wouldn't think so.
I pan with the NEX-7 just
Mike Johnston just reported on rumors that next month will see the
announcement of an interchangeable-lens sibling to the full-frame Sony
RX-1.
Food for thought. And not long to wait to see if it's true.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013, Steve Cottrell wrote:
Was browsing and came across this interesting little article. Caveat: it
was written over 9 months ago so I don't know if updated firmware is
available.
http://photomojomike.com/2012/11/21/fujifilm-x-e1-first-impressions/
Given Marnie's interest
On 9/11/2013 6:31 PM, Tom C wrote:
For those of us with older eyes, the modern EVF's almost feel like a
new pair of glasses.
Mine are not older but weaker and I totally second that.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
The latest generation of EVF cameras have substantially reduced the tendency to
tearing and jitter with camera motion—it's down to almost none now, and is
certainly very usable for my needs. But it is still one area where a good
reflex viewfinder has an advantage.
Likewise C-AF tracking
Perhaps of more interest:
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/tag/fuji/
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
Mike Johnston just reported on rumors that next month will see the
announcement of an interchangeable-lens sibling to the full-frame Sony
RX-1.
Food for thought. And not long to wait to see if it's true.
My opinion only... As nice as that
on 2013-09-11 7:15 Tom C wrote
Take a look through a NEX-6 or 7 EVF. It's a 2.3 million pixel image.
That's more than twice the pixel count of the LCD monitor.
be careful here - pixel is the wrong word; unfortunately, camera manufacturers
have taken to inflating viewfinder resolution by
KEH shows a BGN A 28-135/4 currently in stock. Also a couple of
35-105 F4-5.6 SMC F MACRO (58) EX+ EX and a BGN 35-135 F3.5-4.5 SMC
F MACRO (58). And two EX 28-105 F4-5.6 SMC FA (58)
That says to me you should be able to find some suitable replacement to
fit your needs once you are ready to
Andy Warhol's SX-70 was up on eBay recently
http://petapixel.com/2013/08/09/andy-warhols-1986-sx-70-polaroid-land-camera-selling-on-ebay-for-5/
On 9/11/2013 2:51 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
My photo workshop group gathered for our annual summer party last
Sunday. I carried the Polaroid
Yet, oddly enough, an ounce of gold weighs more than an ounce of
feathers. Go figure.
On 9/11/2013 5:26 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
a pound of feathers, gold only has twelve troy oz per pound.
On 9/10/2013 9:08 PM, John wrote:
Which weighs more a pound of gold or a pound of feathers?
On
Beautiful sunset, but the air's not fit to breathe. Looks like there's
going to be some unplesant consequences for water supplies in the area
as well.
On 9/11/2013 12:39 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Very well done, Bruce! Composition is just great. Exposure is dramatic and
without appearing pushed.
I considered the F 35-105s pretty hard. I decided that I didn't want
to give up the f3.5 constant. The A35-105 is pretty darned sharp wide
open in the center. Perfect for portraits and bokeh is good @ 100mm.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
KEH shows a BGN A
On 9/11/2013 8:34 AM, Tom C wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
... I'm not a big fan of composing on the LCD and have yet to
actually try an electronic viewfinder.
Well, silly Darren, one composes with an LCD or electronic viewfinder
exactly the
They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
condition or not.
http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Thanks Godfrey - I probably need to get my hands on some of the newer EVF's
just to see how they currently are.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com
Subject: Re: Which second party camera system do
Somehow, I doubt that spending $50K for Andy's camera will make my photos any
better.
I already have three SX-70s ... All of them were given to me.
Of course, an order of ten packs of film just cost me $250 ... But I can buy a
LOT of film of $50K. :-)
Godfrey
On Sep 11, 2013, at 12:11 PM,
Suburban = nowhere near as cool as a 46-48 Cadillac limousine.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:42 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
Check Craigslist for a used Chevy Suburban install the deck yourself.
On 9/9/2013 3:20 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I'd love an old limo like his (with platform on
Well, Aahz, I suppose it is power to you then. You see, starting with
K-7, the default focusing screen wasn't properly located for accurate
shallow DOF manual focus (think 77/1.8 wide open or worse yet 50/1.2
wide open). I had a saga with K-7 shimming. The K-5 that I bought brand
new - I
There has been some smoke in our area from the Yosemite Rim fire that provided
an opportunity.
Taken with the K5, Sigma 100-300/4 EX
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/101434682@N06/9725783174/#large
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Shot through a window? The reflection is distracting.
On 9/10/2013 9:39 PM, Philip Northeast wrote:
Pentax K5 DA 21mm Limited - ISO 3200 - f3.2 and 1/20sec (hand held)
http://abouttas.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Battery-Point-restaurant.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Check Craigslist for a used Chevy Suburban install the deck yourself.
On 9/9/2013 3:20 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I'd love an old limo like his (with platform on top) to run around in
now. ('cept, given the fact that I'm a weenie and we are currently
enjoying 100 degree temps, I would like it to
on 2013-09-08 14:04 Larry Colen wrote
It turns out that the 27 display isn't noticably taller, just wider.
This gives me a bit more room on the sides for menus and such. My second
display is a Dell u2312hm in vertical format. I'd prefer something with
less of a wide aspect ratio in vertical
I keep considering the A 28-135, but then look at the reviews on PF
and decide against it. It looks pretty badass though.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
I considered the F 35-105s pretty hard. I decided that I didn't want
to give up the f3.5 constant. The
I'm not boycotting Sony, I just don't like their crap products.
Every piece of Sony consumer electronics equipment I have ever owned
failed had to be replaced exactly one day after the warranty expired.
Although, I haven't forgotten (or forgiven) that root-kit debacle either.
On 9/11/2013
On the downside, you have to deal with that funky Minolta flash mount.
On 9/11/2013 7:21 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
I will say that a while back the one brand that had my attention was
Sony. Pentax made a huge leap when they adopted Sony Exmor sensors,
and Sony gives itself an edge in the sensor
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013, John wrote:
Every piece of Sony consumer electronics equipment I have ever owned
failed had to be replaced exactly one day after the warranty expired.
Timex bought Sony???
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:37:57PM -0400, Zos Xavius wrote:
They average $1500 used usually. $90 seems like quite the steal, ugly
condition or not.
http://www.keh.com/camera/Pentax-Manual-Focus-Non-Mfg-Fixed-Focal-Length-Lenses/1/sku-PK080090382060?r=FE
For about a C-note, it's probably
KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in metal,
excessive finish loss and brassing. Glass will have marks, fungus and/or
haze which will affect picture quality.*
which will affect picture quality says it all for me. It's not might
affect picture quality, it's *WILL* affect
OhI thought that ugly lenses were still ok optically. Yeah, you
are right it probably has fungus or something really awful.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:19 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in metal,
excessive finish loss and brassing.
I had one of those along with the 35-105 and it is a big chunk of glass. It is
nowhere near the performer as the 35-105. I ended up sending it back to KEH
because of the mediocre optical quality.
--
Bruce
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 11, 2013, at 12:40 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
And besides, I don't think there's any way for you to mount a Nikon 6mm
f/2.8 Nikkor AI Fisheye Lens on it.
8-D
On 9/11/2013 3:15 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Somehow, I doubt that spending $50K for Andy's camera will make my photos any
better.
I already have three SX-70s ... All of them were
I'm with John on this one. Somebody ELSE can have THAT steal.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:19 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in metal,
excessive finish loss and brassing. Glass will have marks, fungus and/or
haze which will affect
Not on the latest ones. They now have an ISO shoe fitted with the interface for
their EVF on the RX-1, and the ISO shoe on the NEX 6 as well.
In general, however, I'm not partial to the NEX bodies. They feel very cramped
in my hands. The 6 seems the best of them so far, but it doesn't give me
Driving home last night, I caught a show on NPR about color perception.
http://www.radiolab.org/2012/may/21/
There were some interesting discussions about trichromats, tetrachromats,
and animals that are penta or hexchromats.
It is something that I've been thinking about a lot lately, espcially
Unless you're a working pro on paid assignment from Sports Illustrated,
you're required to have shutter lag. Except, I can't remember if that's
in the Constitution or the NFL's rule book.
On 9/11/2013 11:37 AM, Bruce wrote:
You guys are making me think I should go down to the store and take a
Cotty could do it. He'll mount anything.
B
On 11 Sep 2013, at 21:09, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
And besides, I don't think there's any way for you to mount a Nikon 6mm
f/2.8 Nikkor AI Fisheye Lens on it.
8-D
On 9/11/2013 3:15 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Somehow, I doubt that
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:53:52PM -0600, steve harley wrote:
on 2013-09-08 14:04 Larry Colen wrote
It turns out that the 27 display isn't noticably taller, just wider.
This gives me a bit more room on the sides for menus and such. My second
display is a Dell u2312hm in vertical format. I'd
Boris, focusing wasn't an issue with the 5700 and moving animals/birds - but
I mostly never was able to capture a moving subject and get it in the center
of the frame - I had to anticipate where it was going to be when the camera
decided to capture the image. Granted that was with an EVF that
I'm embarrassed to say that I have YET to even try out my O-GPS1,
which I purchased mainly for the AstroTracer functionality. Life has
been a little disrupted, but is getting back to nominal (as NASA
likes to say during their spacecraft launches).
I now have an even greater incentive to get ON
G'day all,
Thanks for all the comments and thanks, Igor, for that detailed
explanation. It appears that chile, chili and chilli are all
correct - depending on location. I'm fairly sure 'chile' is accepted
in New Mexico - we actually picked up a hand-out at Chimayo which went
to great
On 11/9/13, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty could do it. He'll mount anything.
And frequently do.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Thanks - I'll let you know how it checks it.
stan
On Sep 11, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I'm with John on this one. Somebody ELSE can have THAT steal.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:19 PM, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
KEH UG - Ugly Very rough looking. Multiple impressions in
Non manufacturer 400s average $1500? Not on this planet.
Paul via phone
On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:54 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote:
Thanks - I'll let you know how it checks it.
stan
On Sep 11, 2013, at 4:29 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I'm with John on this one. Somebody
Yesterday's was Which way?, so now I'll answer the question.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17524180size=lg
or
http://gallery.photo.net/photo/17524180-lg.jpg
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Yes - that is what I meant - A 28-135 f4. Nice lens.
On 9/10/2013 1:30 PM, John wrote:
Did you mean an A 28-135/4? I couldn't find an A 28-100/4.
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/short/A28-135f4.html
On 9/9/2013 8:29 PM, Mark C wrote:
Thanks - I remember you posting about this lens
These remind me of photos from a Holga. Interesting and unusual way to
document the party, I think.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi godfreydigio...@me.com
To: PAW Picture-A-Week project p...@micapeak.com; SeePhoto Talk
From all accounts the GXR is a very good camera system, but I don't
understand it (at all) and when you have something that is radically
different than everything else out there, the burden falls upon the
marketing department to make it clear. I look at the GXR modules on
Amazon and it is not
My favorite second party camera is my iphone5. It's all I need in a compact
camera. I've even done some work for the Times with it when circumstances
required that.
Paul via phone
On Sep 11, 2013, at 9:56 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
From all accounts the GXR is a very good
Hi Team,
Can anyone here help me with a reliable Pentax parts supplier, I need
to find out the price for a component (outside Oz)?
Cheers,
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours
Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
The way I understand it is that effectively each GXR module
is the camera portion of a digital point and shoot. I.e. the
lens, aperture, shutter and sensor. The body part is the
computer half of a digital point and shoot, that holds the
display, viewfinder, memory, buttons etc.
The
Thanks Darren - you expressed my frustration exactly! I have 2-3 legacy Leica
lenses, because of these I have a passing interest in any adapter or system
that purports to provide me a chance to use those lenses digitally. I tried to
look at the GXR and I just don't get it.
Back in the day,
Thanks Larry - that helps.
On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:21 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
The way I understand it is that effectively each GXR module
is the camera portion of a digital point and shoot. I.e. the
lens, aperture, shutter and sensor. The body part is the
computer half of a digital point
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:26:30PM -0400, Stan Halpin wrote:
Thanks Larry - that helps.
I should post the disclaimer that I don't think that I have ever
even seen a Ricoh GXR in real life. I've seen a lot of Suzuki
GSXRs, but they are subtley different.
It is possible that I was in error about
Darren,
I don't know how your comments relate to the quotations by John and Aahz Maruch
that you included.
The Ricoh GXR is a unique camera system, and Ricoh has not been very good at
explaining what it's all about.
The concept is this:
Build a compact, light camera as a pair of modules:
Darren (Larry, et al), it is in fact very simple thing. Have a look:
1. You have a camera body. The body serves all the electronic functions:
- card
- battery
- screen
- user interface
- external interfaces
2. You have two small sensor lens modules (I think it is 24-72 and
28-300 or whatever),
Oh, I was looking at pentaxforums prices and saw 1500. I swear
pentaxforums reviews manipulate prices. So you are saying that the 400
is worth less? Interesting. I'd actually love to pick up a 400 even if
it said sigma on it. Those lenses were supposedly very good and work
well with matching TCs.
95 matches
Mail list logo
