--- Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, it's from a Sigma 24mm
Sigma 28/2.8 shares the same hood as well.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we
.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more.
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good news. It tells me that Pentax is at least thinking in terms of
full frame digital.
Or they just borrowed the FA optics and repackaged them into the more compact
plastic bodies?
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My hood is flocked :-)
I just noticed it in your picture, although I prefer to airbrush it matt black.
:-)
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get
included).
Unless you are a heavy flash shooter, rechargable AA NiMHs should be longlasting
enough in most situations.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http
a camera I don't ever use
any more. I hardly ever shoot film and when I do, the PZ-1 or the LX would be
my choices ahead of the ZX-5n.
Nor would I ever get that kind of money out of selling it, once fixed.
I enjoyed it for several years, though.
Oh well.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com
to wide open. It seems like the blurred
background is somehow _too_ blurry at F1.4.
I too have found little use with very large aperture. Usually I prefer to stay
with
f4 for most people shots. I don't really like completely blurred background.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Posted before?
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2004/12/01/554.html
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good.
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
, and the FA31/1.8.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good.
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
From jeff Mon Dec 13 10:46:34 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Mon
than
HOYA SUPER HMC which is much better than their original HMC. However, since
SUPER
HMC is as expensive as SMC, you might just go for SMC if possible. PENTAX
filters
also have thinner and higher quality rims. Don't know about B+W MRC, but their
rims
are thick.
=
Alan Chan
http
://www.digitalcamera.jp/
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/lens/2004/12/13/619.html
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
, if the same symptom occurs to all
your
lenses, you should have the camera checked, although there will be a good
chance you
would be told that the camera was working within specification.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo
are carrying many Pentax
PS, as
well as the D DS, or at least they are being listed and you can order them.
However, consider many FA lenses are difficult to obtain in recent months,
perhaps
they are reserving their marketing resource until the D-FA lenses are
available. Who
knows?
=
Alan
FedEx.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Was the one w/o the aperture ring rubber? I don't remember. But if you saw
one, don't forget to snap a few good pics. I think Bojidar could use a good
pic of this lens for this site. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Hi everybody on the PDML,
I have been silent for a while. Wich does
I could only imagine it was either the motor, or some worn parts like shaft
or gears etc. Never open mine to see what it looks like, sorry. But it
doesn't sound expensive to fix, for the parts at least (labour ecxlude).
:-(
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Out of the blue, my much-used
it looks like. I
don't have the MX anymore so I cannot how you.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
the worst of the bunch in this
area is the FA24/2, it made the Sigma look great.
That Sigma is a gem. Pity about the flare and built quality.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal
section) and see if it moves. If it is fixed
solidly,
quite possible my guess was correct. Pentax primes are very simply in design
and not
much could go wrong.
=
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you
Just beware that the S-HMC CPL does not have front thread, only the Pro1
does (also S-HMC, but thinner rim). Pro1 UV is S-HMC with thinner glass and
3mm rim, you might save quite a bit but using the S-HMC UV which has 5mm rim
and regular thickness glass (more protection I guess).
Alan Chan
According to Pentax Japan web site, the lens should come with case, hood, PF
filter. BH also lists the filter included. I remember there was mentioned
internal filter was part of the system and should be used at all time, but I
cannot confirm.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
For those
of
plastic (taped). You need a fine needle to remove the plastic cover
carefully. The plastic knob has a fixed contact brush underneath so be
careful. However, I do not understand why unmounting the lens would unjam
the lock.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I found a dealer in Germany, who's
either
one, but not both (I guess the camera's built-in flash would be more
flexible).
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Maybe because of the 70° up not providin enough light, the 2 others were a
bit 'too much'? I really dunno. Tell me what's the mistake I made?
, not sure about 50/1.7).
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
The collector in me is in conflict with the user, and I've been wondering:
A clean SMC-A 50mm F2 lens can easily be had for, say, US$ 50. The 43mm
Limited lens is a little wider, a tiny bit faster, and about eight times
more expensive
So far I have only seen Tamron, Pentax (Tamron clone), Nikon (new style) and
a brandless caps (Nikon clone on eBay) with this fearure you mentioned. I
have seen Tamron at a local retailer, and BH carry the Tamon, Pentax
Nikon too.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
That should be Someone
Just contract Pentax Canada and they will look up the parts for you.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
OK, thanks to advice from the group I now have the lens apart and have
found the cause of the locked focus.
The illustrated saga is here:
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/70-210.htm
I need
) and
save the shipping. The bad news is, the smallest bottle is 200g which is not
exactly small.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
OK, thanks to advice from the group I now have the lens apart and have
found the cause of the locked focus.
The illustrated saga is here:
http://members.shaw.ca
found no
service centre I can trust. I miss the Camera Clinic back in Melbourne a
lot. They always fixed my cameras well.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Prior to joining this list,and in a non thinking mode day, i tried to field
clean some
dust gunk, what have
you off my K1000 mirror. I used
.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I'm probably opening mself up for a flogging but here goes:
I've had only one camera so far that didn't focus properly,
by that I mean in-focus in the viewfinder wasn't in-focus on film.
That was an MX, and it was off by a mile.
What I wound up doing was re
Hell, I don't even think my 15 is that bad
I am surprised to see purple fringing when the lens was purposely designed
for digital. Maybe the FA*24/2 is not so bad afterall.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
What's being supplied seem to be different in every country. I suppose many
US users simply prefer Maha or other US famous brands, instead of the
Japanese 4hr chargers which are also good, but not recognized in North
America.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
One of their negatives
grease,
while modern F/FA lenses have very light grease. The aperture rings of
LIMITED lenses have almost no grease. I have got some NYE grease from Fargo
and found them very stable with excellent lubrication, but might be a little
expensive if you need very little. Btw, oil should not be used.
Alan
Quite likely the plastic pin which holds the spring is broken. You can
either drill a hole and install a brass pin yourself, or have that part
replaced by Pentax.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
The retractable flash on my Zx-5n seems to have lost it's spring. It pops
up,
but no longer
will leave
brushng mark on it). My own way of cleaning is to use kitchen detergent on
soaped cotton pad (those found in drug stores) and wipe the wet screen
lightly in one direction several times. Frush the screen with tap water then
blow off all water drops with a rubber blower.
Alan Chan
http
I did not compare them directly, but both A35-70/4 A35-105/3.5 are very
good optically.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Another question: is the KA 35-105/3.5 either a) as good as,
b) about the same, or c) not quite as good as -- the KA 35-70/f4?
A very old US magazine (Modern Photo?) did not rate it high as well, as I
remember (read it in library many years ago).
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
It seems they are both rated 2.5 (F) and 2.7 (A) at Photodo.com
Not very good. This is only a litle better than the Pentax SMC-FA
28-80
to
obtain the feel you like. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Yesterday, at a camera show, I got an A 50/1.4 that obviously had never
been taken out to work. It has no internal dust of course, but its focusing
ring is surprisingly feeling bad, too easy to turn and lumpy, as if it had
too
I have not worked with this lens, but I would suggest not to disassemble the
aperture blade assembly which could be difficult to reassemble precisely.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
David Nelson wrote:
G'day,
Looks like I'll be cracking this lens (Kiron 105mm f/2.8 macro) open
zoom,
but I am no fisheye shooter either. DA40/2.8 is certainly a ridiculous
decision. Why make DA14 when there is 16-45 zoom? Why not make it wider
which is more practical? Something like the Canon EF-S10-22 would be very
attractive and practical.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I guess
mechanically so will not suffer from this potential problem.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
browsing Bojidar's K-mount site I wonder: Sometimes F and FA lenses have
what looks like identical optical formulas. Would you say that for
instance the F 135/2.8 [IF] and the FA 135/2.8 [IF] also have
For a 11 years old a DC might make more sense since she won't have to worry
about processing fee (assuming she has PC at home), something like Powershot
A400. For film PS, Olympus Stylus Epic 35mm seems to be the logical choice.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I've been advised my 11
wow, another jump down! I wonder if it's even cheaper somewhere else in the
world, japan for example...
The price in Japan vary quite a bit. The one I have found is 398,000 yen,
which is about US$3,860 at the moment. It would be even cheaper if not for
the weak USD.
Alan Chan
http
How about a piece of Sandisk ExtremeIII 8GB CF? I don't suppose many people
have that. :-)
Or get him a crazy Really Right Stuff ballhead, again really rare stuff.
:-)
http://www.reallyrightstuff.com/ballheads/index.html
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
So, what do you get
misaligned viewfinder which makes the grid screen useless.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I used the nikkor 55/2.8 macro for a little while for some macro and found
the viewfinder rather hard to use. Call it psychosomatic, but I didn't like
that finder one bit. On a related note, I
/4.5
which is even heavier and longer than the M/A*300/4. But the B1 head helps a
lot, and not exactly a cheap solution. Now imagine the original AF Nikkor
80-200/2.8 without the collar!!
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I concur on the M*300/4 as a very nice hand-holdable long lens.
I use
http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=pentax_forumno=6274
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Looks like most people agree 20x30 is fine for 6MP. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
The FA*300/4.5 is still being listed on the Japanese website so they should
be available, in Japan at least. This lens shows up frequently on eBay so
just keep looking. However, I have found 300mm too short for birds. Maybe
what you really needed is the A*600/5.6? :-)
Alan Chan
http
Not mine.
http://dizin.co.kr/dipeople/proreview/ds/02.htm
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
the
same optics but with triple plastic barrel instead of double metal on the
F/FA.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
The optical formula and mechanics are different.
I don't have the FA or F, but I believe both use internal focus mechanisms.
Theses lenses don't change length as you focus.
I
And speed as well...
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Most of the users moving up from PS cameras that use SD card would most
likey
have cards that need to be replaced due to their capacity.
I suspect the use of SD for the DS is a technical one. Maybe they were
trying to keep it as compact as possible. Personally, I do not like CF
because I feel the pins are fragile. I like the way SD works better.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
The Costco here had one of the Noritsu console damaged for the same reason
as well. The way the slot was design, it is not difficult to bend the pins,
especially when people got nervous and being rough.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Good point. We had our countertop unit down
I am certain I would be very mad if I had to pay for the repair. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
You are much more charitable towards the masses than I.
The only DC I have uses CF, but I cannot imagine myself using that CF in
DSLR because of speed and size. I imagine most DSLRs shooter migrating from
DC might just buy a couple of fast CF for the job. The same may apply to SD
as well.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
SD is by far the most
I cannot imagine how a 6MP file can do 20x30 print nicely without looking
fuzzy, but my PS skill is limited, so I am asking, Has anyone actually done
that?
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
to Leica lenses, when a Pentax user asked which Pentax lenses are
good.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I recommend these 3 too, but not the Velvia 100F.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
1. Velvia 50
2. Velvia 100
3. Kodak E100VS
Provia's nice, but not as highly saturated if that's what you're looking
for.
faster. Some AF
bodies have better algorithms might lock focus and track moving subjects
better.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I used to have these for 35mm cameras. The shoe for the tripod part is okay,
but the release plate for 35mm didn't work well for vertical position at
all. You will be much better off with Arca style plates from Kirk RRS. And
the design of the plate itself is not quite convincing.
Alan Chan
You can use a product called DeoxIT www.caig.com which can remove and
prevent the rust. I recommend the 100% solution for the job. It is best if
you can remove the mount so you might soak the rust with this solution
multi-times for best result.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
My ESII
Aren't all Japanese made products based on their own JIS (Japanese
Industrial Standards)? Well, at least the NIWA JIS blades work fine for
Pentax products so far, and Pentax Canada is using the same fitting blades
as well (but provided by Pentax Japan directly).
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com
Many people have reported some Sigma lenses took longer to lock focus (tend
to hunt more). It seems that the distance and focal length data are required
for AF as well, and those data are held by a chip inside the AF lenses.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
So the answer
Actually that is because threadlock was applied to them in the factory. The
screws themselves are rather short surprisingly (2.5mm only, even for
FA*300/4.5), and 3mm for some heavy lenses.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Depending on the location of the screw, one can often pop it loose
I think for tiny size like 1.4mm is pretty much interchangeable. I used to
have a Wiha small philips which fits well for 1.4mm cross point screws. For
bigger size or tight screws (lens mount screws etc), the fit is important.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I don't know how accurate
Yes it will, as I said before. I used it on my sold MX years ago for the
same purpose.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Assuming I don't need it to look new, will the DeoxIT or something similar
at least stop any additional damage to the mount? This is a good user body
-- can I just seal
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=cartA=detailsQ=sku=41297is=REG
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Anyone know who stocks rear lens caps for KA?
It's easy to find K caps but I'd like some that also
cover the electrical contacts.
Need about 10 of them.
I don't think it's Canon because their 4 data contracts are located on one
side only while Pentax's data contracts are located around the centre
contract.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I seem to remember that someone found out that certain Canon
synch cords are compatible. Mark
Pentax has constantly updating their cameras lenses so I won't be
surprised if they did fix it (maybe using better grease?). The sample I just
returned, had smooth focus ring. I did not tried a heavy metal hood on it
though, just the FA43/1.9 hood.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I believe it's the extra Nikon contacts which are placed farther apart.
That's why it is safe to use Nikon flash on Pentax bodies w/o firing the
circuit.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Nope. The two rearmost contacts of the Nikon flash connection are spaced
farther apart
I have reason to believe that part is defective during the molding process
because it is a plastc tube which cannot be bent. I would never expect such
problem however.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Let's be fare, we don't know when that happened to the lens, it could have
been
Yeah, the barrel that holds the fixed rear glass element, is plastic.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I expect that non-essential parts may be made of high grade plastic. I
doubt everything on any lens is made entirely of
metal these days. For most purposes the plastic in that location
Only the centre contact is located the same. It means you can fire the
flash, but no extra communication, no auto zoom, no ttl or anything else.
Just plain manual focus. So they are not compatible.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Could anyone who uses both Pentax and Nikon equipment
,
but with the advantage of being much cheaper.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Someone suggested marketinium, which is essentially true in that
ED glass is merely a name and doesn't have to mean anything specific, or
even consistent.
However, it usually refers to glass with a very low (high
I have finally bought another FA77/1.8 (silver). Pentax seems to finally
solve the focus ring issue as it is light and smooth now. However, to my
surprise, they replaced the nice green case with a rather cheap looking
black one. :-(
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Am I luck or what? LOL!!!
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/fa77.jpg
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I would never leave any trail. That's the art of stripping. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
HAR ! Alan Chan is not alone ! ;-)
Don Sanderson wrote:
The rearmost element, which has just a slightly different
curvature on the front than the back.. was reversed!
AFAIK, the SP17-35/2.8-4 is a much better lens than the 19-35 which is the
older design. The other 2 latest SP lenses are quite good from what I have
heard - 28-75/2.8 180/3.5 Macro. Looks like Tamron has finally get serious
about their SP lenses.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I went
I am surprised B+W filters are thinner than Pentax or HOYA, because from
what I have seen so far, regular B+W filters are as thick as any filters can
get. Regular Pentax filters are slightly thinner than regular HOYA, and I
thought HOYA Pro1 is the thinnest of all (3mm with front thread).
Alan
Was the HOYA regular (monocoated), HMC or HMC Super? I have found the HMC
Super is much more flare resistance than HMC, though it is not better than
w/o filter.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I did a little test a few years ago using several f1.4 lenses (faster
lenses
seem to amplify
For Energizer, there are 357 EPX76 (both silver oxide). Based on the
technical data provided by Energizer, EPX76 seems to be more sutable for
cameras.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
The ME Super was designed to use Silver Oxide cells which die quite
rapidly, the discharge curve
Secondly, isnt a 15mm F3.5 A lens like $2000 list?
Well, US$6xx not that many years ago. :-) It is expensive now probably
because they are made on order.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
The Nikon 14 is actually a Tamron 14 clone, with ED element. At least that's
what Tamron HK said.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
BTW, are there any other Pentax PRIME DA lenses
other than the 14mm F2.8?
JCO
Maybe someone with better memory can have the final word. A15/3.5 was my
dream lens back in early 90's and I saw it advertised in PopPhoto Magazine
at US$6xx. I don't have any old magazines to double check now of course.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I do not believe the 15mm K or 15mm
AF Tamson SP 17-35-2.8-4.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Are there options I have overlaooked? Tamron SP?
Damn! LOL!
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
After stripped and reassembled on myself,
Workbenches are much more useful for this sort of thing. 8-)
IMHO, FA*85/1.4 is great for portrait, and only. I used it for scenery, and
close-up with extension tubes, but the results were disappointing. FA77/1.8
performs more even for different subjects.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Thanks for all your comments!
So it seems that a 28-105 zoom
The lowest price in Japan I have found is 63000 yen for the silver, but they
don't do overseas. It costs about the same in HK Taiwan. BH has it in
stock again after a long wait, so you might want to snap one up if you can
live with the silver.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Rumor says
True for the MX as well, except the speed between 1/30s 1/60s. But then
again, the mechanical shutter is not that accurate there might not be any
practical meaning to do so.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
In all the Pentax cameras I'm aware of, shutter speed is controlled by a
*single
Applies to me as well. Btw, I think the 2nd shoot was cropped a little too
tight, particular too little space on the top. Maybe it's the 400mm effect,
it looks a little uncomfortable, to me anyway. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I simply think that the reflections which you
After stripped and reassembled on myself, I have to say I much prefer
electronic shutter for much better accuracy reliability. The MX is a real
joy to use, except for slides... :-(
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Same here. My choice would be an updated MX with
mirror lock-up and ISO
.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
At least that's what I think. So what
about let's say a FA 100/2.8 (too heavy?) or the FA 135/2.8 (too long?)?
I am still quite a novice so any advice is really appreciated. Thanks
Peter, Sweden
The back can be removed easily so you might just buy another one to replace
it. Or you may strip down the back and see which part needs to be replaced
(the rubber probably) and order from Pentax Parts Department. It will be
much cheaper this way.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Or driving exotic cars in city traffic...
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
You're right. That's nothing but pleasure of handling nicely krafted camera
in hands. That's one of the main reasons why so many people still likes
their manual cameras very much.
I remember someone mentioned Pentax had recommended the LI setting for
rechargables just in case.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
3. What about the LR6 / LI Switch on the battery grip, what setting do you
use and what difference does it make ?
LR6. I figure that 1.5v is close to 1.35v
suggestion anywhere else outside PDML. Any direct link to any creditable
source to prove this suggestion?
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I believe in lens IS is far more complex. Typically, an IS lens has twice
the number of lens elements than comparable lenses without IS. All
This babe is even rarer than the 15mm. Might just get the Tamron SP
17-35/2.8-4 if you can live with zoom.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Does anyone have a K 18/3.5 they'd be willing to part with?
I got the feeling that by the time they had made the decision, some of us
might not be around to see with our own eyes. LOL.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Who knows. According to the Pentax boss Pentax have decided to market IS in
one form or another. This was a couple of years ago
Don't clean it, you will destory it and end up buying another screen. Just
unclip the metal clip, remove the screen and blow off the dust.
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/MZ-Mscreen0.jpg
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/MZ-Mscreen1.jpg
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Just noticed some dust
But if you must, Camera Clinic is good.
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~ccrepair/
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Just noticed some dust on my 5n's focusing screen and thought may it is
about time I considered getting a CLA just to make sure it's healthy in
general. Anyone know what sort
301 - 400 of 2564 matches
Mail list logo
