???
Resolving power is not spread over the image (lenses are
essentially holographic devices). The medium format lens
simply has a wider field of view. Older MF lenses may not
have been as highly corrected as 35 mm lenses, but in these
days of CAD/CAM the resolving power of the lenses are
essenti
Actually it is a $1000 digital camera, the 22mm x 34mm ccd
is what you pay the other six grand for. I have said it
here before, and say it again. The only camera on the market
in that category right now is the Kodak DCS 460/560. They
recently dropped the price to $15,, so how do you feel
less
Troll alert!
--Tom
Pentax Clover wrote:
>
> Hello
> One of my friend tells me that the Digital MZ shown at the PMA is no more
> devellop ! The projet is stopped, aborted...
> Does anybody know something about this ?
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
No, a ball head is not meaningless for horizontal shots.
Tilting the monopod about 15-20 degrees and leaning into it
holds the camera far steadier than with the monopod
vertical. To do that you need some kind of head.
--Tom
Stan Halpin wrote:
>
>
> One additional variation. Instead of attach
Remember several of the regular contributors to this list
are at Grandfather Mountain this week end. I would be there
myself if it was next weekend. Unfortunately I had more
month than money in May.
--Tom
Bob Poe wrote:
>
> It's OK, Eduardo...I noticed your image quite a while
> before I read
Interesting comments here. Guess I look at things
differently than most of the list. My ratings:
Artistic/emotional appeal. 3,1,2
Technical ability. 2,2,3
In long, technically the first picture is a total wash out.
Artistically your picture, Dave, is just another pretty
camera club shot. It w
The first thing to do is call Pentax. That is the kind of
thing that remains in stock long after interal parts are
gone and tend to be inexpensive. I they do not have one in
stock then I would try searching for one as other members
have mentioned.
Too bad the previous owner was not someone famo
The red eye is caused by the angle off the lens axis of the
flash. At 1 meter the shoe mount flash is maybe 15 degrees
off the axis, at 8 meters it is only one ot two degrees off
axis. Very much the same as using the RTF at closer
distances. In fact at longe distances you can even get red
eye with
Heiland use to make flash guns, then strobs. They expanded
to selling Pentax in the late fifties (I think). Honeywell
bought them out about 1963 or so and became the Pentax
distributor and continued to make the strobs untill the late
seventies (78?) when they sold those to Rollei. They had
given u
Interesting idea, Bill. While I used to use XP-1s variation
in contrast, higher speed in contrastier lighting, I never
thought of doing so rigorously as would need to be done to
approximate the zone system. I don't see why it wouldn't
work with a little serious testing.
--Tom
William Robb wrot
of what Pentax is doing is about the same as most
other members on the list, pure speculation, so you have as
much of a chance as I do of being right.
--Tom
William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[E
If that was offensive to you, you really live a sheltered
life. I guess you don't let your kids watch TV as there is
far more offensive stuff on Saturday morning kiddie shows.
But I guess for people like you it should have had an "R13"
rating in the subject line.
--Tom
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
Actually, I thought rappelling was the english term and
abseiling was french. Abseiling is not in my dictionary,
rappelling is. Nor does my spell checker recognize
abseiling. I always figured folks who said abseiling were
just being pretentious.
--Tom
petit miam wrote:
>
> When I went abseilin
Ya, Rob, you are right about that. Also, most of them
(maybe all) take several seconds to make an exposure. But,
like just about all electronics today if you can buy it it
is obsolete . I understand the old three pass
scanning backs are being replaced by one pass backs. That
is an improvement.
Interesting, the same magnification factor between 23 mm and
28 mm, as 31 & 35, 43 & 50, and 77 & 90. Four lenses? You
guys want to tell me again that it is a coincidence?
--
tom
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the dire
IIRC, the traditional US start of summer is Memorial Day
(May 30) and the end is Labor Day (first Monday in
September). Some time between the early sixties, and the
late seventies the media started calling the Solstices and
equinoxes the beginning of the seasons. Why? I don't
know. My calendar
I believe USAR stands for "USA, Rochester, NY". It indicates
that the film is made and distributed in the US by Kodak.
USA is made in the US and distributed elsewhere and
reimported by the vendor. And, IMP means it is made in an
overseas plant and imported by the vendor.
--Tom
Shel Belinkoff w
Hi Bob:
The Sunny-16 rule came about long and long ago, before the
manufactures removed the the safety factor of about one stop
that they used in rating the films. That is, film went from
200ASA to 400ASA without any change in the emulsion. This
happened back in the late fifties. For best resul
I believe Wein makes a gizmo that fits into the hot shoe and
takes a pc cord, but also isolates the strobes from the
camera. Not sure of the price.
Should be cheaper than IR slaves, or radio slaves.
--Tom
Bob Keefer wrote:
>
> Hi all:
>
> I do a fair amount of studio work with an old set of Sp
Ever hear of a wake? FWIW (for what its worth*), I don't own
a LX, but I
think it is a fine idea.
--Tom
* I suppose we have to do this with traditional internet
abriviation from now on, because newbies are too lazy to
read FAQ (frequently asked questions). ANVSIC (a not very
seriously intended c
HAR! You guys don't fool me. You are all drinking long neck
Buds. I can tell by your redneck posts. HAR, HAR!
--Tom
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http:/
Actually, they are 1.4 volts and once unsealed last about 30
days. Zink/Air cells are not really a viable replacement.
If the camera has voltage regulation in the meter circuit
than silver or alkaline cells are the way to go. There
is/was a company selling adapters that had a zener diode
regulato
Isn't it neet how information never changes? In 1900 leaving
a spring tensioned may have eventually weaken it, but modern
steels? There seems to be some sense to storing the lens
front down as the lub tends to work its way to the back when
in use. Do modern synthetic lubs harden up like older lubs
Well, he made one of those unilateral contracts with you
didn't he? I think you made my point exactly, Bill.
--Tom
William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "aimcompute"
> Subject: Re: Or Best Offer: a misleading--and dishonest--phrase
>
> > BTW, If anybody wants me to build
n be withdrawn at any time.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Rittenhouse
> Sent: April 23, 2001 11:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Or Best Offer: a misleading--and dishonest--phrase
>
> If t
Ethanol (alcohol) has been used as a lens cleaner for many
decades. I know the navy used it to clean periscope optics
on submarines during WWII. So I don't think it would be a
problem. Chlorine (bleach) may not harm the glass, but it is
corrosive as hell and I would not trust it around my photo
ge
The first thing to do is look at the negatives. Ofte when I
have been completely dissatisfied with my work a look at the
negative showed that the problem was with the lab.
Second, trying to do photography and something else, in your
case officating at the race, tends to make the photography
not s
If you read what you wrote, there is an implied contract in
force once you say you will pay me $100 and you let me start
building the dog house. OTOH, if you offer me the $100 and I
come back next week and say I accept your offer, you can say
you changed your mind, there is no contract until both
That means either he has not been deleting posts after
reading them directly from the server, or more likely his
e-mail client is not deleting the messages on the server
after it downloads them.
--Tom
Tanya & Russell Mayer wrote:
>
> James,
>
> if you are reading this, I keep getting all of th
AFAIK there is no such thing as a unilateral contract. Two
or more parties have to come to an agreement before there is
a contract in effect, at least under English common law
which pretty much applies in most English speaking
countries.
--Tom
Frank Theriault wrote:
> Trying to remember what lit
Legality, is between him, you, and the law. If you say I
will give you $X, and he says, "OK" then he is legally
obligated to sell it to you at that price, and you are
legally obligated to buy it at that price. Please note: It
is the fact that the two of you have made an agreement that
makes it a l
I've always translated that to "best acceptable offer".
IMHO, a seller has no requirement to accept any offer, even
a full price one until he says "sold". However, I feel that
if he does not take an offer when offered it is subject to
being withdrawn without notice.
--Tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
Guess the oldest would be the Crown Graphic (1952), unless
the Ricohflex is older but I don't think it is (definately
pre 1955 though). Oldest (and newest) Pentax are ME Supers.
Film? Ilford FP4. Favorite films no longer available? Ansco
Super Hypan, and much later Ilford XP1 developed in XP1
deve
> -Alkuperäinen viesti-
> Lähettäjä: Tom Rittenhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Päivä: 21. huhtikuuta 2001 22:28
> Aihe: Re: Cable Release for MEII Winder
>
> >Doesn't the winder have to be modified to
mote cord on the winder MEII
> or Winder LX - unless removing the plastic cap where the cord
> attaches is considered a modification.
>
> Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> >
> > Doesn't the winder have to be modified to use it? There is
> > no remote jack on my ME II winde
Doesn't the winder have to be modified to use it? There is
no remote jack on my ME II winder. Also, I recall that my MX
winders had to be sent into Pentax to have a remote jack
installed.
--Tom
Donald Ross wrote:
>
> Is there such a beast, and if so, are they still readily available?
>
> Don
>
"Genuine Imitation Metal Finish" . That comes from
the wallet someone gave me as a present when I was small. It
was stamped in gold "Genuine Imitation Leather" an was
actually made out of pressed paper. To this day the
expression comes to mind any time I see or hear about fake
crap!
--Tom
Doug
Yep, and they will buy a $5 item for $10 and pay a $15
shipping charge and tell you what a bargin they got.
Treena Harp wrote:
>
> It is a never-ending source of amazement to me that people will go to garage
> sales and argue over a nickel's difference in the price of an object whose
> conditio
essage -
> From: "Tom Rittenhouse" <
>
> Subject: Re: US Copyright law
>
> > http://www.loc.gov/copyright/faq.html#q35
> >
> > Always check the horses mouth.
>
> So then, I suppose the 64 dollar question would be: Is
> portrait pho
http://www.loc.gov/copyright/faq.html#q35
Always check the horses mouth.
--Tom
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
http://www.asmp.org/information/guides/copyrightguide.html#006
--Tom
William Robb wrote:
>
> The following was gleaned from the Cornell University website.
> This looks very similar to the Canadian ownership clause. It
> would be intersting to see what minds sharper than mine have to
> say abou
AFAIK, there is only one place in my town (Charlotte, North
Carolina, USA) that still does b&w. They charge $13 for an
8x10. Let's see $13 cost minus $5 net equals negative $8
profit. These are customers you don't need.
--Tom
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> Harry Baughman wrote:
> >
> > yes . she a
Excellent explanation Bob. However with the Speed graphic it
was f16 @ 1/100 sec, #5 flashbulb and be there. Usually with
the focus locked on 10 ft giving a 5 to 20 foot in focus and
plus/minus one stop exposure. That did for 80-90% of the
shots. Soup two minutes in Dekol, squeegee and pop into th
metering the shadow area and placing it at the level you wish to
> achieve. In some cases you may want to push the shadow all the way to
> zone 5 (your 16% gray value, in other instances you might want it at
> zone 3, a level where detail is just barely discernible.
> Paul
>
> Tom
Well, evey incident meter I have used was also a reflective
meter. Spot meter? Never found a need for one. Usually, get
by fine with an incident meter and some common sense.
--Tom
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> Bob Walkden wrote:
>
> > Every photographer should have an incident light meter.
>
> ..
t; pictures... how long have you lived here?
> >
> > Tom C.
> >
> > From: "Tom Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > Of course, outside the US the laws may be different, but
> > > most civilised countries are signaturies of th
WRONG
Work for hire is when you are an employee of the
people who you are working for. As a simple rule of thumb,
if they are not paying you wages and taking out taxes you
are not doing work for hire. Short of a written agreement
otherwise that is the only way they could prove you were
doing
You are right her work is only worth what people are willing to
pay for it. However comparing her work to Sears and JC Penny's
is what we are advising her not to do. Respect is very
important
in how the public views your work.
You are aware, are you not, that most of us telling her not to
low
While there are people here that may complain that this
thread is OT. The fact that there are so many replies
indicates that we find it interesting. Besides old
farts like me just love to give advice, especially
to someone who may listen.
--Tom
Tanya & Russell Mayer wrote:
>
> Doug Brewer wrot
By the way, Tanya, I use ME Supers for my 35mm photography.
How dare you say that I ain't a professional because of that
.
For several years I used one camera (medium format) with one
lens. Equipment is an amateur buggy-boo, to a pro a camera is
just a tool. It helps to have the right tool to do
Hi, Tanya,
Tanya & Russell Mayer wrote:
> The mother of the little fairy in the shots I posted earlier
> said to me that the thing that really
> "got" her about the shots I took was that they have so much "heart", and
> that I went to great lengths to consider the
> child's and the parents belief
Just tea this time, and I didn't have any in my mouth. But, I
fully intend to collect that beer, is the snow gone up there
yet?
I get the impression you have the same liking for cameras d'jur
as I do.
--Tom
William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Cy Galley" <
> Subject:
My MEII winder fires and advances the film when I press the
button. The MX winders I had worked the way you describe, but
the MEII does not. This irked me quite a bit because I used
that feature of the MX winder a lot for street photography.
Snap the pic, hold down the button, walk off, release
Some of us think the control layout of the 5/5n/3 is the best
thing about them. It is the only AF camera with a traditional
control layout. So you think Pentax should toss them and the
unique segment of the market and make another me to camera? I
think at least some of us hope not, we want an M
The two standard sizes are 39mm and 25mm. Most enlargers can be
adapted to these. There is/was also a 25 to 39 adapter for
enlargers that did not have interchangable lens mounts.
--Tom
Delano Mireles wrote:
>
> I guess this directed to those who do their own printing:
>
> Are all enlarger le
I think Sam Vinegar, Classic Camera, Photorama, is who you are
talking about, Bob. His store is one of those wonderful places
where you can browse for hours and find something you didn't no
even existed. I haven't been in the Detriot area for more than
ten years, but did business (buying and sell
k into the pdml server. interesting. I contacted
>the tech people there, who didn't sound surprised.
>
> Doug
>
> At 3:42 PM -05003/11/01, Tom Rittenhouse caused thus to appear:
> >Heck, maybe my multiple message problem wasn't Netscape after
> >all. This ki
Over on rec.photo.? a gentle man has compared film v digital and
concluded that digital is better. He did this by scanning a 4x6
photo and printing it out as a 8x12 and printing an 8x12 taken
with his 3 megapixel camera. He says the digital picture was
definitely the better of the two.
???
--To
On Ebay they call them unused old stock. As far as I know there
is only one company in the world currently making flash bulbs.
There is/was supposed to be another one in China but I have
never found any information on them. Megaflash in Ireland does
not make FP rated bulbs as far as I know.
Now
ear I was being sarcastic, I thought would be taken to
be in fun. It certainly was more apparent than a smiley face.
But, I guess one man's sense of humor is another man's rudeness.
--Tom
Chris Brogden wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
>
> > Well, n
Well, no. Mint comes from coin collecting. It means just like
it came from the mint with no signs of wear what so ever, even
the little rough edges from the stamping press are not worn.
For cameras it means that is is like new but the packaging and
papers are missing.
Like new should mean the
I have found this to be true myself. Congradulations on your
move to "PRO" photography.
--Tom
Treena Harp wrote:
>
> I think everybody's got this whole camera body thing all wrong. :) I have
> truly found the secret for respect (yeah, right ...). When I first started
> using my ZX-5n with an
If it turns out to be defective, you could see if they would
have it repaired instead of refunding the money. Many dealers
will do this, a bird in hand being worth two in the bush, so to
speak. And they will have to have it repaired before they can
sell again anyway, or let it go for almost nothi
If my message was taken as a diatribe against Eduardo, I
apologize to him, and anyone else that took it so. It was an
out spoken comment I admit as I hope the last line made clear.
And, please note, I did not say Eduardo was dumb, I said certain
actions are dumb. That is so even when I am the on
Netscape seems to have gone crazy on me. I'll try reloading it
before I post this one. BTW it is doubling in both directions.
--Tom
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
BUT! Do those dealers who have been quoted here sell any of
those cameras? I think not.
--Tom
Mike Johnston wrote:
>
>
> Maybe...but off the top of my head I think of the Contax S2, Aria, and
> TVS...the tiny Minolta, what's it called, that sells for more than $1K...the
> Nikon 35Ti and 28Ti,
Money. What are we talking about here $15,000 worth of MX v.
$60,000 worth of LX?
--Tom
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> Who's doing all of this MX purchasing?? AND WHY AREN'T YOU BUYING LXes??!!!
>
> AAARRRGH!!!
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go t
IMO, the rectangular hoods, not the square,k like they used to
make for the 50mm M lenses are the best. BTW, If someone has
one they want to sell please e-mail me.
--Tom
dosk wrote:
>
> Read an article in a photomag by an older, experienced writer whom I
> respect. He says these new tulip sha
Since my primary camera for most of the last fifteen years was a
Mamiya Universal, I don't think so.
But, if my primary income, instead of just occasional, was from
photography I would have felt the need for a newer system. The
reason for that is the need for off the shelf equipment
availablit
post it in the list for those who might be
interested.
--Tom
aimcompute wrote:
>
> Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
>
> > Except for folks who are too poor to own but one camera, why would one
> want to work
> > that way with 35mm? And, those relatively poor photographers
> &
Interesting. That is a very high percentage doing their own
darkroom work. I would guess it would be one or two percent for
color. Of course in pure numbers that would come out to about
50-50 wouldn't it?
--Tom
Mike Johnston wrote:
>
> Paul wrote:
>
> > I was surprised to discover that graded
What you say is astute, to a point. But. You knew there was
going to be a but, right? Some of the folks think that the only
thing that belongs in PDML is things like, "The 85/2 is soft
wide open", and "I agree".
Now while that is useful information, it is not very
interesting. Any discussion h
Well, the LX probably sold only 1/20th as many as the Nikon F3,
but many on this list would say it was the better of the two.
High end cameras other than Nikon or Canon have a tough row to
how. They do not sell well, but of course the dealers don't
stock them so you can not walk in and by one, b
Sure, Bill, I agree with you to a point. But those large slow
moving cameras are for that kind of work. Except for folks who
are too poor to own but one camera, why would one want to work
that way with 35mm? And, those relatively poor photographers
aren't going to have a bag full of primes.
I
At this point, with availability in two months, I would think
that production has already started. That would mean that
mechanical specs are firm, however, software can be tweeked
right up to the last moment. Many of us forget that these
modern gee-whiz cameras are basically a computer with some
Your comments make some sense for ups Pentax users who can use
just about any lens Pentax ever made. But, for those other
brands? However, I would venture if you make your living with
your camera you won''t be using elderly equipment, you could not
afford to.
--Tom
"Provencher, Paul M." wrote:
> IMO, what Pentax needed to do was release the Minolta Maxxum 9 with the
> abilty to accept K-mount lenses and everything that goes along with it.
> That would have been the killer camera.
Yep, this would make it especially interesting to those of us who dislike
Minota intensely. Pentax has, an
Interesting. I didn't know a lens had a point of view. I thought that was
what the photographer decided. Point of view (perspective and angle) are
decided by location. You use your feet to get it correct. Framing is
decided by focal length (or cropping) you use your zoom lens, or cropping to
c
Killed? That is truely sad. I am sorry to hear it.
--Tom
Dennis Klimovich wrote:
>
> sorry for my silence about all today's messages...
>
> it was black day for russian photographers - Oleg Belkin
> from my favourite Moscow photo shop "Novy Kolisey" was
> killed...
> He also made www.photoweb.
And a higher wage for skilled labor than Charotte NC, a town
where $750K homes are advertised as a bargain.
--Tom
Treena Harp wrote:
>
> And indoor plumbing and (gasp!) SHOES!!
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Th
Since I bought a couple of ME Supers just 6 months or so back, I
guess I will give my opinion here. If you want light and
compact, important to me, go with the ME Super. If you don't
trust battery dependent cameras go with the K-1000 (an aside:
the K-1000, from day one to the end, were lost lead
Ok, I have gotten confirmation that the top, bottom, and front
covers a definitely mag alloy.
Opinion: I would guess that it is actually an
aluminum-magnesium alloy probably only 20% or so mag. That
would be far more corrosive resistant than if the mix was the
other way around and stronger, but
IMHO, yes. But that is just my opinion from handling both, I
have never shot any film with either camera.
--Tom
Pål Jensen wrote:
>
> Tom wrote:
>
> >The MZ-S looks and feels more rugged than the
> > LX, but it's what's inside that counts, and only time will tell.
>
> Is this to be taken li
Matjaz OSOJNIK wrote:
>
> > Tom wrote:
> > Wow guys, I got to fondle the MZ-S today. The rep who told me I
> > was wrong about the A35/1.4, called me and said he was in town
> > and did I want to see the new camera. Four speeding tickets
> > later (figuratively speaking) I had it in my hands.
"Arne Lie (f)" wrote:
>
> Tom,
>
> You have so far not answered: how noisy is it? The shutter, the motor (I
> mean winder...)?
About the same as a Canon EOS 3 I would estimate. In other words
quite quiet for a MD/AF camera.
>
> What about AF accuracy and responsiveness: is it hunting? Did y
Hey, when you press the button the lenses stops down. I did not
try the electronic DOF if it even has one, but would imagine it
works like the ZX-5n.
Paul Jones wrote:
>
> How good is a electronic DOF preview is comparison to the standard
> mechanical type like on the Super Program and LX?
-
As I have stated previously, no I am not sure. I was going by
the texture of the top plate. It could be some kind of tough
coating on die cast. The spec sheet definately states the top
and bottom plate are diecast magnesium. The camera does feel
very solid.
As I answered in a previous message
"David A. Mann" wrote:
>
> Tom Rittenhouse writes:
>
> I can't wait to handle the camera for myself to get a feel for the controls. I
> really like the interface of the Z-1p although the left-hand dial is a little
> cumbersome. I especially notic
Answers inline.
--Tom
John Francis wrote:
>
> Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
> >
> > The mode selection is almost transparent. Touch a green button
> > convenient to your index finger and it goes into program mode.
> > Set the f-stop on the lens it automatically goes in
Wow guys, I got to fondle the MZ-S today. The rep who told me I
was wrong about the A35/1.4, called me and said he was in town
and did I want to see the new camera. Four speeding tickets
later (figuratively speaking) I had it in my hands. I asked if
I could write about it to the list, and he sa
I rek'n you ain't been reading rec.photo.largeformat, Mike. I
have it on good authority that them old press camera lens cain't
make a good 8x10 from a 4x5 negative. And if you stop them down
defractions jus' distroys the image to unusability. If'n it
war't true they would'n post it thar.
--Tom
To the best of my memory which is often not so good Pentax held
the original patent for multi-coating. Everyone else, incuding
Zeiss, licensed it from Pentax or developed a different way of
doing the same thing.
--Tom
Pål Jensen wrote:
>
> Len wrote:
>
> > Some may not know it so it may bear r
Ah, such is life. I noticed when I was in the library yesterday
that they have a copy of "Alice's Restaurant". It was setting
right at the front of the rack.
--Tom
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> John Francis wrote:
>
> > Son, are you *moral* enough to take those photographs?
>
> So, I spend five
Ah, but, some of the people that would be on the location list
are lurkers and so wouldn't get spam from the archives. And
many spammers are rather dumb and don't realize a mailing list
archive has lots of specialized e-mail addresses in it. As it
is I get about 10 spams a week I figure they got
Thank you Doug for doing that!
--Tom
Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> Rob,
>
> You'll note that the headers have had individual
> addresses removed from them in the archives.
>
> To get the email addresses off the archive site, you'd
> have to read each individual message, then click on the
> private r
For anyone else interested in photographing gymkhanas (also
called autocross) check out http://www.autocross.com. Seems
like there is one in my area about every Sunday. Good Shooting.
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
>
> I doubt any one is going 150+ in a gymkhana. Maybe 70-80. The
> c
Chris, If you plan to post it on the web please leave mine out.
I get enough juck mail as it is. I would imagine a list
containing e-mail addresses would be a spammers wet dream come
true.
You might talk to Doug Brewer about Majordomo, it is very good
at sending things out to a mailing list.
But then some of us thought the MX was the best camera ever
made. Quite a tough act to follow. Anyone out there think a
Z-1p is the best camera ever made?
--Tom
Pål Jensen wrote:
>
> Dan wrote:
>
> > To bad the PDML group wasn't around (& the net, naturally) back when the LX
> > was first ant
I know you are right, David. I have seldom had a camera fail in
use, but often when I have not used one for a long while they no
longer work. Fortunately, the deteriation from just sitting
around is often inexpensive to fix.
--Tom
"David A. Mann" wrote:
>
> Bill D. Casselberry writes:
>
> >
I doubt any one is going 150+ in a gymkhana. Maybe 70-80. The
course are usually vary short with lots and lots of turns. They
are usually set up in parking lots.
On ice I would be leery of the outsides of turns. There usually
are not any long straights so that pretty much leaves the inside
of
401 - 500 of 563 matches
Mail list logo
