l.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim
Bray
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2012 3:23 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Best FF Pentax Rumour Story EVER!!
I have to say that I'm of two minds about it; I find that processing
the K-5 pictures is already slow enough, and I don
list even more and go further in the direction of keeping things simple...
- Toralf
Hi Toralf,
You'd admit it is good way to sell products though right? :) I don't
Quite.
It's not given that it's the best way for a company in the position
Pentax is in today, though. It&
I think what the K-5 does is wait until you're finished shooting a burst
(almost impossible not too in fast-continuous mode) before it goes about
building the JPEG for the LCD. I find that if I want to chimp a shot, I must
wait from 3 to 10 seconds before it's available to view.
I can only ass
ll
> hifis...@gate.net
> -
>
> Best FF Pentax rumor would be the one that immediately proceeds FF coming
> true!
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PD
Yesterday I went running as usual with my regular Saturday morning
running group. After the run we go to Starbucks for coffee and banter
and a few other friends usually show up. Recently a cyclist friend
turned up and happened to mention that he'd just bought a new camera.
He isn't a serious photog
e. He announces with glee that he just bought a Canon
some such DSLR model whose name he could not remember. Pause. I ask "Why?" to
which he replied "Because everyone knows they make the best cameras." Followed
up with "I had Pentax cameras years ago. I didn't kn
On Sep 16, 2012, at 09:47 , Tom C wrote:
>>
>> I think I paid $1300 for the 6MP *ist D.
>> I'll pay $3300 for the 33MP D800E.
>> If using raw resolution as a single factor to compare upon, the *ist D
>> cost me $216/MB while the D800E is $100/MB.
>> Obviously there's more to it than MB, but one
From: "Bob W"
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Toralf Lund
I don't know, personally I'm not convinced that chasing the "latest and
greatest" and focusing on higher numbers (in various specs) or a longer
list of features, is generally a good way to make p
On 9/16/12 19:19, Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Toralf Lund
On 9/16/12 15:51, Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf
Of Toralf Lund I don't know, personally I'm not convinced that
chasing the "late
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Toralf Lund
>
> On 9/16/12 15:51, Bob W wrote:
> >> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf
> >> Of Toralf Lund I don't know, personally I'm not convinced that
> >> chasing the "latest and grea
> From: George Sinos
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Tom C wrote:
>> It's
>> a rare product that can sell and compete by boasting about what it
>> DOESN'T have/do.
>
> Apple has made quite a business of it. Of course, as you say, there
> aren't too many Apple like companies out there.
>
> g
On 9/16/12 15:51, Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Toralf Lund
I don't know, personally I'm not convinced that chasing the "latest and
greatest" and focusing on higher numbers (in various specs) or a longer
list of features, is generally a good
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-----
Best FF Pentax rumor would be the one that immediately proceeds FF coming
true!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visi
>
> I think I paid $1300 for the 6MP *ist D.
> I'll pay $3300 for the 33MP D800E.
> If using raw resolution as a single factor to compare upon, the *ist D
> cost me $216/MB while the D800E is $100/MB.
> Obviously there's more to it than MB, but one sees the point.
>
> Also, I doubt I'll be buying a
On 16/09/2012 9:17 AM, Tom C wrote:
It's a rare product that can sell and compete by boasting about what it
DOESN'T have/do.
Since people like bringing in car analogies (which I don't really agree
with), I've never seen a compact car ad extolling the virtues about not
being able to carry a
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Tom C wrote:
> It's
> a rare product that can sell and compete by boasting about what it
> DOESN'T have/do.
Apple has made quite a business of it. Of course, as you say, there
aren't too many Apple like companies out there.
gs
George Sinos
---
ssue.
What you're suggesting for Pentax would be a recipe for oblivion. It's
a rare product that can sell and compete by boasting about what it
DOESN'T have/do. OK, I can do w/o just about all picture modes, in
camera RAW processing and in-camera HDR. But some people just love
tha
On Sep 16, 2012, at 07:15 , George Sinos wrote:
> In my opinion, Pentax has a great line of equipment that could compete
> very well if they concentrated on marketing, distribution and dealer
> support.
>
> GS
Well put George.
Here's hoping RIKOH feels they now have a brand worth putting an ef
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Paul Stenquist
>
> >
> >> I don't know, personally I'm not convinced that chasing the "latest
> >> and greatest" and focusing on higher numbers (in various specs) or a
> >> longer list of features, is generally a good way
On Sep 16, 2012, at 9:51 AM, "Bob W" wrote:
>> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
>> Toralf Lund
>
>> I don't know, personally I'm not convinced that chasing the "latest and
>> greatest" and focusing on higher numbers (in various specs) or a longer
>> list o
I remember, back in the film days, Olympus defined a niche for the
half-frame camera in a universe of full-frame 35mm offerings.
I suppose it may be conceivable that Pentax may occupy a similar niche
if the two major camera makers move to full frame.
On the other hand, I have a feeling that the c
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Toralf Lund
> I don't know, personally I'm not convinced that chasing the "latest and
> greatest" and focusing on higher numbers (in various specs) or a longer
> list of features, is generally a good way to make products.
On 9/16/12 9:05, Tom C wrote:
From: Darren Addy
Now I don't hang out in the automotive forums, and maybe there were
some people who (before Honda introduced their Ridgeline pickup) got
totally ticked off at Honda for not bringing out a pickup when they
wanted to buy one. And they whined and compl
On Sep 16, 2012, at 3:47 AM, Tom C wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote: Pentaxians have fixated on frame dimension because they
> don't have a big one.
>
> Um, Mark?
>
> Sorry Paul, it was funny.
Don't be sorry. The jest was intentional.
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.
Paul Stenquist wrote: Pentaxians have fixated on frame dimension because they
don't have a big one.
Um, Mark?
Sorry Paul, it was funny.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly a
> From: Darren Addy
> Now I don't hang out in the automotive forums, and maybe there were
> some people who (before Honda introduced their Ridgeline pickup) got
> totally ticked off at Honda for not bringing out a pickup when they
> wanted to buy one. And they whined and complained and stamped th
On 16 September 2012 11:44, Darren Addy wrote:
> Now I don't hang out in the automotive forums, and maybe there were
> some people who (before Honda introduced their Ridgeline pickup) got
> totally ticked off at Honda for not bringing out a pickup when they
> wanted to buy one. And they whined an
I think the automotive manufacturer analogy is probably the most
appropriate. Some manufacturers like to be in *every* market, from the
inexpensive subcompact up to the full-size pickup. But a lot of auto
manufacturers make a good living by excluding some markets. If you
want a pickup, you have to
On Sep 15, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Tom C wrote:
>> On 14/09/2012 6:34 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> I doubt that a lack of a competitive 24 x 36 camera will lead to immediate
>> defections over the holiday buying season, although it
>> might cost Pentax some sales to impressionable newbies. The Niko
> On 14/09/2012 6:34 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I doubt that a lack of a competitive 24 x 36 camera will lead to immediate
> defections over the holiday buying season, although it
> might cost Pentax some sales to impressionable newbies. The Nikon certainly
> wouldn't interest me if it couldn'
On 15/09/2012 6:17 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
what do you mean?
43 will be very similar to 31 now, and 77 to 43.
I found all three of them to be not quite long enough. T
The 31 is neither long enough nor wide enough. It falls right in the
middle of useless.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pe
what do you mean?
43 will be very similar to 31 now, and 77 to 43.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:15 AM, William Robb
wrote:
>
> On 14/09/2012 6:34 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>> I doubt that a lack of a competitive 24 x 36 camera will lead to immediate
>> defections over the holiday buying season,
On 14/09/2012 6:34 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I doubt that a lack of a competitive 24 x 36 camera will lead to immediate
defections over the holiday buying season, although it might cost Pentax some
sales to impressionable newbies. The Nikon certainly wouldn't interest me if it
couldn't equal
On 14/9/12, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Seriously:
>
>http://photo.net/pentax-camera-forum/00anEI?start=10
>
>Read the 2nd post from the top, by Garry Ian Young.
>
>:-)
I sincerely hope it happens!
I mean seriously, how hard can it be in his day and age?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\
PJ,
I don't think the lens cost is an issue with the 645D.
People will use the original autofocus 645 lenses.
No big deal...
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:13 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> True, but at a price, $800 more or ~$1500 with a the kit zoom. All such
> decisions are a trade of
Yeah. My Porsche can out-corner and out-brake your Ferrari!
On Sep 14, 2012, at 17:36 , Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
> well, the thing is, nikon will almost definitely have a significant
> real-world advantage in low-light/high-iso...
>
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Paul Stenquist
> wrote
True, but at a price, $800 more or ~$1500 with a the kit zoom. All such
decisions are a trade off. I think Pentax has to announce a 24x36mm
sensor camera pretty soon, and it's price will have to be in the $2000
range. I suspect they may have planning to do that with a 24mp sensor
but for abou
Probably 2000.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Miserere wrote:
>
>>Well, the Canon 6D has been leaked and should be announced soon (as a
>>D600 competitor). Price is expected to be sub $2,500.
>
> I'll be surprised if it isn't within about $100.00 of the D600!
>
>
> --
> Ma
Miserere wrote:
>Well, the Canon 6D has been leaked and should be announced soon (as a
>D600 competitor). Price is expected to be sub $2,500.
I'll be surprised if it isn't within about $100.00 of the D600!
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Dis
Pentaxians have fixated on frame dimension because they don't have a big
one.
MARK!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: Best FF Pentax Rumour Story EVER!!
I doubt t
Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
> well, the thing is, nikon will almost definitely have a significant
> real-world advantage in low-light/high-iso…
Probably. But that hasn't been a given with some full-frame cameras, and
price/value considerations enter into it as well. Pentax is so strong in APS-C
THERE are already some preliminary whispers. ARRRGH!
On Sep 14, 2012, at 8:34 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I doubt that a lack of a competitive 24 x 36 camera will lead to immediate
> defections over the holiday buying season, although it might cost Pentax
> some sales to impressionable newbie
well, the thing is, nikon will almost definitely have a significant
real-world advantage in low-light/high-iso...
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I doubt that a lack of a competitive 24 x 36 camera will lead to immediate
> defections over the holiday buying season, altho
I doubt that a lack of a competitive 24 x 36 camera will lead to immediate
defections over the holiday buying season, although it might cost Pentax some
sales to impressionable newbies. The Nikon certainly wouldn't interest me if it
couldn't equal the low-light performance of the K-5. If the K
On 14 September 2012 18:18, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Miserere wrote:
>>> Seriously:
>>>
>>> http://photo.net/pentax-camera-forum/00anEI?start=10
>>>
>>> Read the 2nd post from the top, by Garry Ian Young.
>>>
>>Once Nikon is out with their co
Bob Sullivan wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Miserere wrote:
>> Seriously:
>>
>> http://photo.net/pentax-camera-forum/00anEI?start=10
>>
>> Read the 2nd post from the top, by Garry Ian Young.
>>
>Once Nikon is out with their compact, full frame camera,
>Pentax will need to announce some
M,
Once Nikon is out with their compact, full frame camera,
Pentax will need to announce something to stem the defections
over the holiday buying season.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Miserere wrote:
> Seriously:
>
> http://photo.net/pentax-camera-forum/00anEI?start=10
>
> Re
Seriously:
http://photo.net/pentax-camera-forum/00anEI?start=10
Read the 2nd post from the top, by Garry Ian Young.
:-)
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Cory Waters wrote:
> Are we aware that the K1000 is #41 on Amazon's best selling DSLRs list?
>
> Hard to explain but slathered with awesome sauce nonetheless.
The "D" makes it particularly hard to explain.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
It's at 45 now, but that is so weird. Maybe it's because all those
college film photo courses are starting up and students are getting
the K1000s for the class.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Cory Waters wrote:
> Are we aware that the K1000 is #41 on Amazon's best selling DS
Are we aware that the K1000 is #41 on Amazon's best selling DSLRs list?
Hard to explain but slathered with awesome sauce nonetheless.
Cory
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link dir
I thought it was appropriate in the context of the hipster thread. ;-)
Actually, it had lots of manual controls and it's kind of a waste on
the all automatic types.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Steven Desjardins wrote:
>
>>I always thought the lomo crowd was a good targe
Steven Desjardins wrote:
>I always thought the lomo crowd was a good target group for this
>camera.
Ouch! The most damning comment yet!
;-)
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdm
inted out yesterday, if
> you keep your eye on Amazon Deals, it is possible to get a returned Q
> kit (all-but-new) for around $335 and that makes it a "BUY"
> recommendation, in my book.
>
> People are waiting for the overdue, but promised Pentax K to Q adapter
> but i
one, would have potentially turned the Q into a
vehicle for selling more DFA 100mm macros (if nothing else). Yet
Pentax features nobody using the Q in these ways. In short, I think
the the Q may be the best camera that is combined with the worst
marketing in the history of the universe.
--
"The
On Aug 1, 2012, at 7:14 PM, jn289 wrote:
> Larry, that's a nice collection of photos, Joe
Thanks Joe.
>
>> Here are my best from July:
>> http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157630616628954/
>>
>>
>> --
>&g
On Aug 1, 2012, at 1:18 AM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
> On 8/1/2012 1:44 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> Here are my best from July:
>> http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157630616628954/
>>
>>
>> --
>> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
&
Larry, that's a nice collection of photos, Joe
Here are my best from July:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157630616628954/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.n
curred to me that the cars on the bridge would be a surprise, but
then I was there watching the moon rise behind the overpass.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> He
, Larry Colen wrote:
> Here are my best from July:
> http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157630616628954/
>
>
> --
> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http:/
On 8/1/2012 1:44 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Here are my best from July:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157630616628954/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
Some really nice shots in there, Larry!
My personal favorites, in order:
50125
56676
57922
The first one
Here are my best from July:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157630616628954/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
ystem know nothing of any other system.
Let's see. Since this is done by a survey of buyers, want to bet that
none of those answering that Canon had the best image quality had ever
actually seen Nikon or Pentax image quality, or more importantly tried
to process a file from any camera but
All is good, but I much rather Pentax started converting good vibes into
solid cash...
On 7/1/2012 5:42 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PetaPixel/~3/Hl6rW1YzwKc/
full story:
http://autos.jdpower.com/content/press-release/RoPDeNH/2012-digital-single-lens-reflex-camera-onl
On Jul 1, 2012, at 3:59 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
> Me with just 1 dSLR on a desert island, gotta be a K5 with 43 or 31 lens.
>
>
Yep, I'm with you on this one about K5- I'd need two lenses though, 21mm & DA*
50-135mm. Cheers, Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
On Jul 1, 2012, at 10:52 PM, wrote:
> Maybe we should observe a week of 'no bitchin' about Pentax stuff in honor of
> the award. ;+]
>
I'm giggling out loud at this suggestion--too funny! Cheers, Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/
Maybe we should observe a week of 'no bitchin' about Pentax stuff in honor
of the award. ;+]
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: J.D. Powers Report: Pentax Crowned
Cool.
Cheers,
frank
"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Darren Addy
Sent: June 30, 2012 6/30/12
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: J.D. Powers Report: Pentax Crowned Best
The K7 and especially the K5 were real breakthrough digital cameras
for Pentax. I'm hopeful Pentax will release that 'killer" mirrorless
system as well. They currently have "great IQ but too big" and
"really small but sensor-limited" systems. Third time's the charm.
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 7:32
David Parsons wrote:
>Nice. Now if only Pentax had a way of telling potential customers
>about this...
Thay have been via online media and social networks ever since the
announcement was made.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 09:42:20PM -0500, Darren Addy wrote:
> http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PetaPixel/~3/Hl6rW1YzwKc/
>
> full story:
> http://autos.jdpower.com/content/press-release/RoPDeNH/2012-digital-single-lens-reflex-camera-online-buyer-report.htm
While I'm glad to see Pentax getting goo
Me with just 1 dSLR on a desert island, gotta be a K5 with 43 or 31 lens.
Sent from my iPad
Jeffery L. Smith
New Orleans, Louisiana
USA
On Jun 30, 2012, at 21:42, Darren Addy wrote:
> http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PetaPixel/~3/Hl6rW1YzwKc/
>
> full story:
> http://autos.jdpower.com/content/
Nice. Now if only Pentax had a way of telling potential customers
about this...
Oh well.
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PetaPixel/~3/Hl6rW1YzwKc/
>
> full story:
> http://autos.jdpower.com/content/press-release/RoPDeNH/2012-digital-single-
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PetaPixel/~3/Hl6rW1YzwKc/
full story:
http://autos.jdpower.com/content/press-release/RoPDeNH/2012-digital-single-lens-reflex-camera-online-buyer-report.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/techniques/tonal_adjustments_in_the_age_of_lightroom_4.shtml
>
> Wow! What incredible, and *useful*, differences just in one slider
> adjustment alone. That does it: upgrade time ...
Yeah, when LR4 was relea
Reading all the printing articles and comments at TOP (thanks, Derby!)
led me to this one:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/techniques/tonal_adjustments_in_the_age_of_lightroom_4.shtml
Wow! What incredible, and *useful*, differences just in one slider
adjustment alone. That does it: upgrade time
On May 2, 2012, at 3:17 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
> You already know what I think of the first one.
Technically I call the gallery "faves", so they're really my favorites, rather
than my best photos.
>
> :-)
>
> Love the rest, though. Very strong gall
;Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: April Best Of
It's a rather thin set this month:
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157629763370797/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdm
On 5/2/2012 2:39 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
It's a rather thin set this month:
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157629763370797/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
Great shots, Larry!
I especially liked 47919 and the way it captured the pull on that bass
string. Quite
Very good choices, Larry. Great stuff.
Less is more.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> It's a rather thin set this month:
> http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157629763370797/
> --
> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss M
It's a rather thin set this month:
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157629763370797/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link di
Thanks, Ann!
If you can get here and find it, you'll have a place to crash!
It's /just a tad/ on the rural side. ;)
-- Walt
On 4/7/2012 9:57 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Walt
were you not the one who said that I was the one living in a place
where the most interesting photos could be grabbed? I
Walt
were you not the one who said that I was the one living in a place where
the most interesting photos could be grabbed? I think not :-)
I'd love to be more often in a place where a lovely gray horse was
rolling around in the grass and blossoms and butterflies abound that
hold still, too.
On 4/6/2012 2:24 PM, Jens wrote:
Keep on walking, Walt. Beautiful work.
Regards
Jens
Many thanks, Jens!
I'd hoped to get out again this morning, but the temperature dropped
down into the low 40's F -- and after a month of temperatures in the
70's and 80's, that's mighty cold. Supposed to be
t;
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >> From: Walt Gilbert
> >> Sent: Apr 5, 2012 8:44 AM
> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> Subject: Re: GESO: Probably my best photowalk to date
> >>
> >> Thanks, Paul!
> >>
> >&g
Thanks much, Joe!
I'm up early this morning, hoping to take advantage of some good light a
little later. But, damn, does it feel cold in the 40's after almost a
month in the 70's & 80's!
Brrr...
-- Walt
On 4/5/2012 9:39 PM, jn289 wrote:
Walt, I like 22-14, 27-19 t
Walt, I like 22-14, 27-19 the BEST, and 32-25..Very nice Walt...Joe
Hi all,
I took the K20D and K-x out again this morning, around 8:00 with the
intent of taking photos of my neighbor training his horse.
Unfortunately, it was the horse's off-day -- so he'll be running
Jack
From: Mark C
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: GESO: Probably my best photowalk to date
On 4/4/2012 6:50 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
I took the K20D and K-x out again this morning, around 8:00 with the
intent of taking photos of my neighbor tra
rk C
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 5:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: GESO: Probably my best photowalk to date
>>
>> On 4/4/2012 6:50 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I took the K20D and K-x out again t
M, Kenneth Waller wrote:
At least it's one of the times for great light.
-Original Message-
From: Walt Gilbert
Sent: Apr 5, 2012 8:44 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: GESO: Probably my best photowalk to date
Thanks, Paul!
I really should get out in the morning mor
On 4/5/2012 11:09 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walt Gilbert
Hi all,
I took the K20D and K-x out again this morning, around 8:00 with the
intent of taking photos of my neighbor training his horse.
Unfortunately, it was the horse's off-day -- so he'll be running
tomorrow morning (weather permit
From: Walt Gilbert
Hi all,
I took the K20D and K-x out again this morning, around 8:00 with the
intent of taking photos of my neighbor training his horse.
Unfortunately, it was the horse's off-day -- so he'll be running
tomorrow morning (weather permitting).
Rather than let the light go to was
At least it's one of the times for great light.
-Original Message-
>From: Walt Gilbert
>Sent: Apr 5, 2012 8:44 AM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: GESO: Probably my best photowalk to date
>
>Thanks, Paul!
>
>I really should get out in t
On 4/4/2012 11:39 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Sorry, too many good ones to comment on each.
That's nice enough for me, Larry. Thanks!
-- Walt
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to U
d by anyone who knows what they're doing.
It's a shame, too. I really like that lens. Best $20 I ever spent.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the
Thank you, David.
I tried a slightly tighter crop on the bird photo, but the bokeh from
that lens takes on a mottled look at lower apertures, so I thought it
best to sacrifice the detail in favor of the broader scene. As for the
horse shot, I tried getting a narrower aperture setting to get
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
> I'm growing more impressed with that 70-300 all the time.
>
> -- Walt
Is this a manual focu lens.?? Cause if it is it does great. I have a
real hard time with MF lenses, what i see as focused as opposed to
what the focus beep says is in focu
Another fine gallery. I like the first one, wonder how a tight crop on
the bird would work out, and the horse trailer one. I liked the horse
shot of the cremelo ( i think it is) framed by the two black heads but
i think more DOF would help that one.
Dave
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Walt Gilbe
List"
Subject: GESO: Probably my best photowalk to date
Hi all,
I took the K20D and K-x out again this morning, around 8:00 with the
intent of taking photos of my neighbor training his horse.
Unfortunately, it was the horse's off-day -- so he'll be running
tomorrow morning (weather perm
On 4/5/2012 6:44 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Collin Brendemuehl
wrote:
The only question that strikes me is the subdued red of the blackbird's
shoulder. It's usually brighter -- unless perhaps the female is darker.
Female Red-winged Blackbirds are totally differe
601 - 700 of 3748 matches
Mail list logo
