Re: 300mm enabled

Nikkor big, ugly, hard to hand hold. SMC-A*, while not actually pretty, is definitely more ergonomic, and a WHOLE lot smaller (even though its a faster lens). Whatddaya mean - "not actually pretty"? It's a ~gorgeous~ lens !!! Fred :) YMMV, I suppose, but compared to the sleek Limiteds, the

Re: 300mm enabled

David wrote: Good buy; mine got a workout yesterday shooting my brothers kitesurfing. Sometimes I feel guilty for not using it enough... Out of interest, how much for and where from? Looking forward to seeing some of your results from it. Cheers, David The lens was on consignment sale at Whilton

Re: 300mm enabled

On 9 Apr 2005 at 19:36, Bob Blakely wrote: > I traded my SMCA* 300/4 in on an SMCA* 300/2.8 ED (IF). > $750 + tax cash from my pocket > > I may be wrong, but I think the bottom line is fair. > > I am beginning to miss that light weight a bit though... I think that you did very well on

Re: 300mm enabled

I traded my SMCA* 300/4 in on an SMCA* 300/2.8 ED (IF). Relative advantages: 1 stop faster for easier focusing. Tripod mount. 49mm rear filter (I have lots of them). Completely internal focusing (IF). Came in it's own box with warranty papers. I sent them in. Scares the crap out

Re: 300mm enabled

> Nikkor big, ugly, hard to hand hold. SMC-A*, while not actually > pretty, is definitely more ergonomic, and a WHOLE lot smaller (even > though its a faster lens). Whatddaya mean - "not actually pretty"? It's a ~gorgeous~ lens !!! Fred

Re: 300mm enabled

Good buy; mine got a workout yesterday shooting my brothers kitesurfing. Sometimes I feel guilty for not using it enough... Out of interest, how much for and where from? Looking forward to seeing some of your results from it. Cheers, David Derby Chang wrote: Impulse buy yesterday. Picked up a SMC

Re: 300mm enabled

Nice grab. I just got a Sigma 300F4 myself. Love it. Enjoy, Dave > > Impulse buy yesterday. Picked up a SMC-A* 300mm f4.0 lens yesterday. > Amusingly, the guy in the shop showed me a Nikkor 300mm f4.5 to compare > with it. Nikkor big, ugly, hard to h

300mm enabled

Impulse buy yesterday. Picked up a SMC-A* 300mm f4.0 lens yesterday. Amusingly, the guy in the shop showed me a Nikkor 300mm f4.5 to compare with it. Nikkor big, ugly, hard to hand hold. SMC-A*, while not actually pretty, is definitely more ergonomic, and a WHOLE lot smaller (even though its a

Adapotall enabled

Today I got the Adaptall 2 mount I bought from Jim Colwell. It's great - with userguide and all. Now, my two adaptall lenses (2.8/28mm and 3.5/70-150mm) both work like A-lenses. Especially on the "D" this is a huge advantage, since I don't have to use stopped down metering anymore. The lenses are

Re: More Film enabled!

. Jim A. > From: Powell Hargrave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:09:55 -0700 > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: More Film enabled! > Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:09:28 -0400

More Film enabled!

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7503533928 This was my first serious camera. Small and simple with a sharp lens. Sorry I ever sold it. Hope the new one has a safe trip from Germany. Where the hell is my light meter? Oh well I have a few weeks to find it or just shoot sunny

Re: Film enabled!

oh ... and I thought film is dead :-) well, I still have a lot of fun with my Zip (PZ-1p) too. Enjoy your hamster! Peter >I am already looking forward to shooting more film! > >All the best > >Jens Bladt >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt

Film enabled!

Today I received Joe Wilensky's MZ-S, Battery Grip and extras. All in pristine condition. Thanks to Joe and thanks to the PDML. This is my second MZ-S, since I sold my first one, in order to finance my *ist D. I regretted this and was looking for another nice MZ-S again. I almost had forgotten the

RE: 90mm Macro enabled!

Congrats, Don. You're really going to enjoy this lens! Amita

RE: 90mm Macro enabled!

The famous SPAF 90mm! Congrats! Jens Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 28. marts 2005 17:11 Til: PDML Emne: 90mm Macro enabled! Well, I finally did it. After waiting and waiting

Re: 90mm Macro enabled!

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Don Sanderson wrote: > 'Tired' of waiting I got this one instead: > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7503871860 If it's anything like the MF (looks similar) I have, you are going to love it. It is my current standard lens, as the garden is coming to life and

FW: 90mm Macro enabled!

Rats! Forgot to mention the Sigma is a 2.8 Manual focus. :-( Don -Original Message- From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:11 AM To: PDML Subject: 90mm Macro enabled! Well, I finally did it. After waiting and waiting one finally popped up on KEH

90mm Macro enabled!

Well, I finally did it. After waiting and waiting one finally popped up on KEH used for $299.00, too much. 'Tired' of waiting I got this one instead: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7503871860 Brandy Spa-Dankin new with full warranty for $249.00! It's not he very latest version,

Re: The family is complete. 31mm enabled

Stop that woman before she burns off all the alcohol!. That concoction must be designed to keep you Aussies sober . Paul On Mar 26, 2005, at 7:41 AM, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote: Derby Chang Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:49:03 -0800 > >Yes, I've had that problem with all of the Limited lens caps. I tend to

Re: The family is complete. 31mm enabled

Derby Chang Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:49:03 -0800 > >Yes, I've had that problem with all of the Limited lens caps. I tend to take it off and keep them in my pocket >until the camera goes back in the bag. The lenses do look odd a normal cap on them. > >Put up one pic using the 31mm. Bit busy this weeken

Re: The family is complete. 31mm enabled

Alan wrote --- Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll not say a bad word about C.R. Kennedy again. The 31mm Ltd arrived yesterday just in time for Easter. And at $A1299, it was cheaper than buying from B&H (including shipping and GST). Boy, what a weighty feeling lens. Just take goo

Re: The family is complete. 31mm enabled

Congratulations Derby. Thats a great price. All I need to round out my "family" is the 43. (Mustresisttemptation) Have fun. :-) Dave S On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:37:17 +1100, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll not say a bad word about C.R. Kennedy again. The 31mm Ltd arrived

Re: The family is complete. 31mm enabled

--- Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll not say a bad word about C.R. Kennedy again. The 31mm Ltd arrived > yesterday just in time for Easter. And at $A1299, it was cheaper than > buying from B&H (including shipping and GST). Boy, what a weighty > feeling lens. Just take good care of

The family is complete. 31mm enabled

I'll not say a bad word about C.R. Kennedy again. The 31mm Ltd arrived yesterday just in time for Easter. And at $A1299, it was cheaper than buying from B&H (including shipping and GST). Boy, what a weighty feeling lens. I'll try to take a few shots this weekend. D -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://h

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

But for those lenses without integrated hoods there are solutions http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PDML_--_ipth.html :-) (I just wanted an excuse to post that). Rob Studdert wrote: On 15 Mar 2005 at 11:17, Tom C wrote: Clear answer... Thanks. I figured it must have to due with possible vign

Re: Flexhoods for Pentax? (was: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled)

Look here: http://www.flexhood.com/ Peter >What's a flexhood? > >Thanks > >Frantisek

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

Tom C wrote: Keith Waley wrote: The 35mm negative frame is not circular, it's rectangular. Gee Keith. Thanks for clueing me in on that! :) Yeah, that was sort of stupid, wasn't it? If you ray-trace the 35mm frame out thru the lens, and project it outward (the reverse of how light enters the le

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Rob Studdert wrote: > On 15 Mar 2005 at 17:24, John Francis wrote: > > > The work about as well as they do for the central portion of a 35mm frame. > > How is that? Well, take the lens, stick it in front on a FF camera, take a picture and crop the centre portion so as to end

Re: Flexhoods for Pentax? (was: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled)

What's a flexhood? Thanks Frantisek

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

On 15 Mar 2005 at 17:24, John Francis wrote: > The work about as well as they do for the central portion of a 35mm frame. How is that? > Sure, you could do better with a custom design for the APS-sized sensor. > But it's not going to work any worse than it did on a 35mm film camera. Extending t

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

Keith Waley wrote: The 35mm negative frame is not circular, it's rectangular. Gee Keith. Thanks for clueing me in on that! :) If you ray-trace the 35mm frame out thru the lens, and project it outward (the reverse of how light enters the lens, but for now, allow me that reversal...) you'll find

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

Rob Studdert mused: > > On 15 Mar 2005 at 11:17, Tom C wrote: > > > Clear answer... Thanks. I figured it must have to due with possible > > vignetting, as many wide angle hoods are rectangular. I didn't put two and > > two > > together and realize that the petal shape was a deliberate compromi

Re: Flexhoods for Pentax? (was: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled)

On 15 Mar 2005 at 23:06, Peter Smekal wrote: > That's bad news for all of us who want to use some of the "old" lenses on > the *istD. What about the A15/3.5 with its integrated hood for instance. > There is not even a flexhood for Pentax. I guess the market for Pentax gear isn't too significant :

Flexhoods for Pentax? (was: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled)

>And is really only designed to complement a full 35mm frame, integrated hoods >on 35mm full frame lenses aren't really suitable for use with APS sized >sensors. > >http://www.flexhood.com/ > > >Rob Studdert That's bad news for all of us who want to use some of the "old" lenses on the *istD. What

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

On 15 Mar 2005 at 11:17, Tom C wrote: > Clear answer... Thanks. I figured it must have to due with possible > vignetting, as many wide angle hoods are rectangular. I didn't put two and > two > together and realize that the petal shape was a deliberate compromise for > size. And is really only

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

Tom C wrote: Yesterday I received my FA 31/1.8 Limited. Purchased from another list member who heard my pleas for help in finding one at a decent price. He had one in brand spanking new condition, which I was able to purchase at a reasonable price. A beautiful lens. I'm curious why it has a

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

On Mar 15, 2005, at 12:42 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote: "Yesterday I received my FA 31/1.8 Limited. Purchased from another list member who heard my pleas for help in finding one at a decent price. He had one in brand spanking new condition, which I was able to purchase at a reasonable price." I can

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

Well, for the seller, it was a lens that was not seeing that much use, so it was matter of getting a return on an idle piece of equipment that could be reinvested. Tom C. From: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net To: pdml Subject: Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited E

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

"Yesterday I received my FA 31/1.8 Limited. Purchased from another list member who heard my pleas for help in finding one at a decent price. He had one in brand spanking new condition, which I was able to purchase at a reasonable price." I cannot believe what I just read. Someone getting out of

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

iginal Message: - From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:17:44 -0700 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled Clear answer... Thanks. I figured it must have to due with possible vignetting, as many wide angle hoods are rectangular. I didn'

RE: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

28 or 35) that they're thinking of parting with, I've been looking for some enablement myself. :) j >-Original Message- >From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 1:18 PM >To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net >Subject: Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:07:03 -0800 Tom C wrote: Yesterday I received my FA 31/1.8 Limited. Purchased from another list member who heard my pleas for help in finding one at a decent price. He had o

Re: FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

Tom C wrote: Yesterday I received my FA 31/1.8 Limited. Purchased from another list member who heard my pleas for help in finding one at a decent price. He had one in brand spanking new condition, which I was able to purchase at a reasonable price. A beautiful lens. I'm curious why it has a

FA 31/1.8 Limited Enabled

Yesterday I received my FA 31/1.8 Limited. Purchased from another list member who heard my pleas for help in finding one at a decent price. He had one in brand spanking new condition, which I was able to purchase at a reasonable price. A beautiful lens. I'm curious why it has a flower-shaped

Re: MX (and more) enabled (finaly)

On 24/2/05, Thibouille, discombobulated, unleashed: >Finaly! Troubles with the Post being over, I got my first MX and a >couple interesting lenses. >I paid 181 euros including shipping. It was described as a "24/36 >reflex camera" LOL... Thanks :) > >Condition of the MX is OK and not more 'cos the

MX (and more) enabled (finaly)

Finaly! Troubles with the Post being over, I got my first MX and a couple interesting lenses. I paid 181 euros including shipping. It was described as a "24/36 reflex camera" LOL... Thanks :) Condition of the MX is OK and not more 'cos the user felt the right tu engrave it's phone number on the si

Re: Enabled (was Re: On-the-Go Storage, it works!)

plus Rob's endorsement, which I trust, > JB> plus a recent big print sale I made, I've been enabled. I just ordered > JB> a Compactdrive PD7X with an 80GB disk and Mac firmware upgrade. > > JB> I'm planning to do some traveling this year--possibly taking the > JB&

Re: Enabled (was Re: On-the-Go Storage, it works!)

Rob's endorsement, which I trust, JB> plus a recent big print sale I made, I've been enabled. I just ordered JB> a Compactdrive PD7X with an 80GB disk and Mac firmware upgrade. JB> I'm planning to do some traveling this year--possibly taking the JB> transiberian, afte

Re: Enabled (was Re: On-the-Go Storage, it works!)

ig print sale I made, I've been enabled. I just > ordered > a Compactdrive PD7X with an 80GB disk and Mac firmware > upgrade. > > I'm planning to do some traveling this year--possibly taking > the > transiberian, after years of thinking about it. I'm going to >

Enabled (was Re: On-the-Go Storage, it works!)

OK--enough. Among the conversation here, plus Rob's endorsement, which I trust, plus a recent big print sale I made, I've been enabled. I just ordered a Compactdrive PD7X with an 80GB disk and Mac firmware upgrade. I'm planning to do some traveling this year--possibly taking t

Re: Re[2]: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:51:31 -0500 (EST), John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pentax, though, are rarely early adopters. Really? I hadn't noticed. -frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson

Re: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

"Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >A major manufacturer with an existing relationship will have >pre-production copies and specifications >for design and testing. If Sony is going to have the chip in quantity >soon then their major customers already >have something to work with. Bin

Re: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:56:31 -0500, Peter J. Alling wrote: > If they are like most other companies they probably hired a fulfillment > house to handle it for them. These places are usually run on a very > tight budget and the only way for them to make a profit is to run as > lean as possible.

Re: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

A major manufacturer with an existing relationship will have pre-production copies and specifications for design and testing. If Sony is going to have the chip in quantity soon then their major customers already have something to work with. John Francis wrote: Mark Roberts mused: Alin Flaide

Re: Re[2]: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

"John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Mark Roberts mused: >> >> Alin Flaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Currently there is no 8 MP APS CCD available from Sony, Sanyo, etc. >> >> The key word there is "currently". You can bet your bottom dollar that 8 >> megapixel and greater CMOS

Re: Re[2]: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

Mark Roberts mused: > > Alin Flaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Currently there is no 8 MP APS CCD available from Sony, Sanyo, etc. > > The key word there is "currently". You can bet your bottom dollar that 8 > megapixel and greater CMOS sensors are under development by Sony and > others.

Re: Re[2]: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

Alin Flaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Currently there is no 8 MP APS CCD available from Sony, Sanyo, etc. The key word there is "currently". You can bet your bottom dollar that 8 megapixel and greater CMOS sensors are under development by Sony and others. And not far off production. -- Mar

Re: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

If they are like most other companies they probably hired a fulfillment house to handle it for them. These places are usually run on a very tight budget and the only way for them to make a profit is to run as lean as possible. This can lead to very spotty operations. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

RE: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

The delay wasn't the vendor's fault. It was a Pentax rebate. Based on other comments here, I would say that they are usually very pokey when it comes to sending the rebate. Paul > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > B&H is still bundling a new D with the DA 16-45 for $1599. > > This used to be accomp

RE: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

OK Paul, > The delay wasn't the vendor's fault. It was a Pentax rebate. > Based on other comments here, I would say that they are > usually very pokey when it comes to sending the rebate. Fair enough, but voucher/rebate/whatever schemes just seem a bizarre way of getting to the bottom line. How

RE: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

Paul Stenquist wrote: > B&H is still bundling a new D with the DA 16-45 for $1599. > This used to be accompanied by a $200 rebate. I'm not sure if > that rebate is still in effect. BTW, I finally got my rebate > check from Pentax this week. > Took about six months and one letter of complaint.

Re: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

B&H is still bundling a new D with the DA 16-45 for $1599. This used to be accompanied by a $200 rebate. I'm not sure if that rebate is still in effect. BTW, I finally got my rebate check from Pentax this week. Took about six months and one letter of complaint. Paul On Feb 17, 2005, at 11:14 PM,

Re[2]: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

Currently there is no 8 MP APS CCD available from Sony, Sanyo, etc. Except for the Nikon one implemented in the D2X there is no 12 MP either. As Pentax has a history of using old and proved technology :oT I expect we'll see a D upgrade only after the D90 or whatever hits the market. S

RE: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

ED]> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net To: Pentax discussion list Pentax discussion Subject: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn? Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:24:46 -0600 Hey Gang, I'm about to get the only spending money I'm liable to see all this year-- we&#

Re: Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

Sid Barras mused: > > Hey Gang, > > But I'm wondering, what's the scuttlebutt on a new pentax digital to > update/replace the *istD? > I've not seen anything on the list lately that looked like rumors of > new models from Paal or the other "insiders," so > > Whaddya hear guys? Should I go for

Sid's gettin enabled soon-- *istD, *istDS, or wait for *istDn?

Hey Gang, I'm about to get the only spending money I'm liable to see all this year-- we're moving into a lovely new home soon, with a lovely new house note-- But I'm wondering, what's the scuttlebutt on a new pentax digital to update/replace the *istD? I've not seen anything on the list lately

Re: RE: OT - enabled with film :-)

Thank you for the info and the link! Best, Bernd --original message Don Sanderson Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:03:12 -0800 The 605n has the shutter speed displayed in the viewfinder, that's the only difference I know of. Her's a very good Fujica site: http://www.toptown.com/nowhere/kypfe

Re: Mmm MX enabled

Nice to know. I'll play a bit with the 30mm ASAP and let everybody know. Thibouille

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

On 31/1/05, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed: >My second 605N finally showed up. >It's still got the protective plastic on the bottom. ;-) >Not bad for a 25yr old! Nice one you sod! > >Here's a cool Fujica site in case my other post didn't >get to you: > >http://www.toptown.com/nowhere/

RE: OT - enabled with film :-)

> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:40 PM > To: pentax list > Subject: Re: OT - enabled with film :-) > > > On 31/1/05, Bernd Scheffler, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > > >I don't know Straker, but beside of that you

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

On 31/1/05, Bernd Scheffler, discombobulated, unleashed: > >I don't know Straker, but beside of that you perhaps may explain what are >the differences between the Fujica ST605 and the Fujica605N? Er, the 'N' ?? :-) I don't know!

RE: OT - enabled with film :-)

January 31, 2005 11:30 AM > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: Re: OT - enabled with film :-) > > > Hi Cotty, > > I don't know Straker, but beside of that you perhaps may explain what are > the differences between the Fujica ST605 and the Fujica605N

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

Hi Cotty, I don't know Straker, but beside of that you perhaps may explain what are the differences between the Fujica ST605 and the Fujica605N? Best, Bernd --original message Cotty Sun, 30 Jan 2005 13:16:43 -0800 Oh yes, this is beautiful!

Re: Mmm MX enabled

Thibouille wrote: Although I know I have bodies enough I can't help but buying others :) I already have KX and SuperA+MotorA and Ricoh KR10X (which a plastic thing useful for very bad conditions :) and my brother lent me Z1 and P30t. I bought an MX (not arrived yet) and couple lenses: * SMC Penta

MX enabled :)

Although I know I have bodies enough I can't help but buying others :) I already have KX and SuperA+MotorA and Ricoh KR10X (which a plastic thing useful for very bad conditions :) and my brother lent me Z1 and P30t. I bought an MX (not arrived yet) and couple lenses: * SMC Pentax-M 50mm 1.4 (alr

Re: Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

> > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Harlington-Straker was the name of the movie studio that was the front of > S.H.A.D.O., the base of the organisation set up to protect Earth from > marauding aliens ;-) > > M. Wanda Ventham > BTW, this sit

Re: Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

> > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/01/31 Mon AM 08:26:18 GMT > To: "pentax list" > Subject: Re: OT - enabled with film :-) > > On 31/1/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > Googled and I now know > > C

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

On 30/1/05, Gianfranco Irlanda, discombobulated, unleashed: >I guess I have to quit... :-( >Too late (almost 2 a.m.) and too long since last time I saw a >complete episode of the series (which was on air last time not >very long ago, say a couple of months... I should have seen >more). Harlington

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

On 31/1/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: > Googled and I now know CHEAT! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _

Mmm MX enabled

Although I know I have bodies enough I can't help but buying others :) I already have KX and SuperA+MotorA and Ricoh KR10X (which a plastic thing useful for very bad conditions :) and my brother lent me Z1 and P30t. I bought an MX (not arrived yet) and couple lenses: * SMC Pentax-M 50mm 1.4 (al

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

Cotty wrote: On 30/1/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: From a 1970's TV Sci-fi series? ..yes? And? And this is the voice of the Mysterons... 8-)) Captain Scarlet's HQ. Can't remember more than that. Close - but *no* cigar!! (i've aways wanted to say that) I'll give you a

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30/1/05, Gianfranco Irlanda, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >The name Straker makes me think about the commander in the > >U.F.O. series - I don't know its title in English. > > Getting much warmer. So where does 'Harlington-Straker' come into it? On > what

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

And it was (is?) a good camera too - I had one for about four years after my first Pentax kit got stolen. John Coyle Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "pentax list" Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 7:15 AM Subje

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

On 30/1/05, Gianfranco Irlanda, discombobulated, unleashed: >The name Straker makes me think about the commander in the >U.F.O. series - I don't know its title in English. Getting much warmer. So where does 'Harlington-Straker' come into it? On what particular building do the names 'Harlington-St

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30/1/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > From a 1970's TV Sci-fi series? > > ..yes? And? The name Straker makes me think about the commander in the U.F.O. series - I don't know its title in English. Gianfranco = _

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

On 30/1/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed: >Geez. You're right, Cotty, that's a lovely camera. Thanks for >bringing it to our attention. Oh, I should have mentioned - it's all mine ;-) Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.c

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

On 30/1/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: >>>From a 1970's TV Sci-fi series? >> >> >> ..yes? And? > >And this is the voice of the Mysterons... > >8-)) > >Captain Scarlet's HQ. Can't remember more than that. Close - but *no* cigar!! (i've aways wanted to say that) I'll

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

On 30/1/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed: >I have no idea what the hell you guys are talking about, but if I >might interrupt you for one second: > >Geez. You're right, Cotty, that's a lovely camera. Thanks for >bringing it to our attention. Isn't it just. I can *smell* it from h

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

Cotty wrote: On 30/1/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: From a 1970's TV Sci-fi series? ..yes? And? And this is the voice of the Mysterons... 8-)) Captain Scarlet's HQ. Can't remember more than that.

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:31:36 +, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 30/1/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: > > > From a 1970's TV Sci-fi series? > > ..yes? And? I have no idea what the hell you guys are talking about, but if I might interrupt you for one second: Geez.

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

On 30/1/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: > From a 1970's TV Sci-fi series? ..yes? And? Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

On 30/1/05, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, unleashed: >Hey Cotty, >looks familiar: > >http://tinyurl.com/5wt6t > >and: > >http://tinyurl.com/48ehq > >The first one's very cool, the second one's lost in the mail. >LOVE the viewfinder and the pushbutton meter/DOF switch! Snap! Cheers, Cotty

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

Cotty wrote: A cigar to the first person who recognises the seller's eBay ID (WITHOUT Googling it!) I knew it right away, sadly. From a 1970's TV Sci-fi series?

RE: OT - enabled with film :-)

] > Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 3:16 PM > To: pentax list > Subject: OT - enabled with film :-) > > > Oh yes, this is beautiful! > > <http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? > ViewItem&category=15241&item=3869924451> > > > > > Cheer

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

A cigar to the first person who recognises the seller's eBay ID (WITHOUT Googling it!) I knew it right away, sadly. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cott

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

You found one! Congratulations. It reminds me of the ST 801 that I shot with for at least ten years. Made a lot of money with that camera. And that's enough to get me all weepy and teary eyed. Paul > Oh yes, this is beautiful! > > ViewItem&category=1

Re: OT - enabled with film :-)

- Original Message - From: "Cotty" Subject: OT - enabled with film :-) Oh yes, this is beautiful! Yes, it certainly is. William Robb

OT - enabled with film :-)

Oh yes, this is beautiful! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _

Re: Finally - enabled

Oh, no... what have I started? I had a shock when I realised how small it is (compared with my MZ-6). It would be smaller even if I put a winder (I've saw one at ~50 euro and it looks nice - but I have no interest in buying it. Btw: the camera+repairs - i.e. cleanup&foam replacement - costed sligh

Re: Finally - enabled

if I used it with flash, i probably wouldn't need to worry about how quiet/loud the camera is :) compared to *my* rangefinder, MX wins on both accounts of size and quietness: Fuji GSW 690. otoh, Rolleicord is s quiet. and quite compact. but then my digicam is even quieter (it is silent).

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >