It worked, and NoScript didn't squawk about it like it used to do with
some of your dropbox PESOs.
Looks good to me.
ps: nice rock.
On 10/7/2016 2:25 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Well, I'm using very simple HTML pages, so I set up a updog.co page, and
it seems to work. Not quite as easy
a rocky start...
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:25 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> Well, I'm using very simple HTML pages, so I set up a updog.co page, and it
> seems to work. Not quite as easy as the old dropbox method but the HTML
> renders properly at least for me. I'm sending a link
I can confirm that your photography is as good as ever.
I'm getting my coat.
> On 07 October 2016 at 07:25 "P.J. Alling" wrote:
>
>
> Well, I'm using very simple HTML pages, so I set up a updog.co page, and
> it seems to work. Not quite as easy as the
app, which is too bad, I liked that icon.
>
> On 10/7/2016 2:25 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> > Well, I'm using very simple HTML pages, so I set up a updog.co page,
> > and it seems to work. Not quite as easy as the old dropbox method but
> > the HTML renders properl
lling wrote:
Well, I'm using very simple HTML pages, so I set up a updog.co page,
and it seems to work. Not quite as easy as the old dropbox method but
the HTML renders properly at least for me. I'm sending a link to test
this to the PDML, so feedback would be nice.
https://pdml.u
Well, I'm using very simple HTML pages, so I set up a updog.co page, and
it seems to work. Not quite as easy as the old dropbox method but the
HTML renders properly at least for me. I'm sending a link to test this
to the PDML, so feedback would be nice.
https://pdml.updog.
As some of you know, Dropbox has discontinued HTML rendering on its
service. A bit of a bummer if, like me, you were using Dropbox to host
the odd gallery or two. I know one or two PDMLers were also using
Dropbox in this manner
However, there is a work-around that I found while looking for
work
AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> >> October 3 is what Dropbox tells me for my account. They may be phasing
> >> the change in.
> >
> >
> >Thanks, Bruce. It looks as if I'd better start moving those galleries.
> >Fortunately I have some personal web space that sho
ely I have some personal web space that should be able to cope.
It's a pity that Dropbox is dropping html support - it was what set the
service apart from other cloud-based storage sites. But, it was free so
it's difficult to moan too much.
http://xkcd.com/1150/
There is a small di
ave some personal web space that should be able to cope.
>
>It's a pity that Dropbox is dropping html support - it was what set the
>service apart from other cloud-based storage sites. But, it was free so
>it's difficult to moan too much.
http://xkcd.com/1150/
--
Mark
pe.
It's a pity that Dropbox is dropping html support - it was what set the
service apart from other cloud-based storage sites. But, it was free so
it's difficult to moan too much.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-r
notice it's still working at the
> moment.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Brian
>
> ++
> Brian Walters
> Western Sydney Australia
> http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016, at 03:08 AM, P.J. Alling wro
s-ryan.org/southernlight/
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016, at 03:08 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> Anyone using Dropbox to display their photographs using an HTML page or
> for that matter gallery software such as jalbum should complain. I
> don't know if they will reverse the decision, but i
, so go away.
On 9/1/2016 2:48 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Yeah, their choices for image viewing are very lame. Your way is a
huge improvement, for sure.
I have used Lightroom's ability to create html-based galleries and
hosted them in Dropbox and that works great.
I did not realize they had
Yeah, their choices for image viewing are very lame. Your way is a
huge improvement, for sure.
I have used Lightroom's ability to create html-based galleries and
hosted them in Dropbox and that works great.
I did not realize they had gone through this feature removal before.
Gives me hope,
t the user to control of how content is displayed.
On 9/1/2016 1:51 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I doubt they'll reverse their decision. The HTML hosting aspect is not
their core business, is most likely an accidental feature/side-effect,
adds a measurable load to their servers, and probably is abu
I doubt they'll reverse their decision. The HTML hosting aspect is not
their core business, is most likely an accidental feature/side-effect,
adds a measurable load to their servers, and probably is abused by
"warez" or porn providers. It's also possible they are planning an
i
Anyone using Dropbox to display their photographs using an HTML page or
for that matter gallery software such as jalbum should complain. I
don't know if they will reverse the decision, but it's worth a try anyway.
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I
On 2016-05-13 10:34 , John wrote:
On 5/11/2016 7:04 PM, steve harley wrote:
just to exercise the new config here are some non-ASCII characters:
üµ•°√`¡™£¢∞§
(my UTF-8 emails to the list are often converted to ASCII by the listserv)
FWIW, some of those characters (£, ¢) worked before the ch
On 5/11/2016 7:04 PM, steve harley wrote:
just to exercise the new config here are some non-ASCII characters:
üµ•°√`¡™£¢∞§
(my UTF-8 emails to the list are often converted to ASCII by the listserv)
FWIW, some of those characters (£, ¢) worked before the change was
implemented.
--
Science
>From Gmail on android to you :-)
On 12 May 2016 12:41, "Chris Mitchell" wrote:
> I can see it so it got somewhere.
>
> (From Gmail on Android)
> On 12 May 2016 00:59, "Godfrey DiGiorgi" wrote:
>
> > See if it gets there, from iPad.
> >
> > G
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML
I can see it so it got somewhere.
(From Gmail on Android)
On 12 May 2016 00:59, "Godfrey DiGiorgi" wrote:
> See if it gets there, from iPad.
>
> G
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
I c u
On 5/11/2016 7:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
See if it gets there, from iPad.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Gets where?
(From gmail app on iPhone)
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> See if it gets there, from iPad.
>
> G
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link dire
See if it gets there, from iPad.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 2016-05-10 10:27 , Rick Womer wrote:
Herr Listmeister set the software to accept html, but it converts it to
plain text, IIRC.
indeed, that's what it is doing; one odd side-effect is that Unicode email
is coming in base64-encoded; it's plain text, and it's legal, but it see
I say we go with the "Doug"policy!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>
> We have a list policy? Does it cover breakage?
>
>> On 5/9/2016 11:47 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
>> Looking into it in more depth reveals that allo
We have a list policy? Does it cover breakage?
On 5/9/2016 11:47 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
Looking into it in more depth reveals that allowing HTML through
Mailman (our list software) entails suspending content filtering,
which then allows file attachments through. I am hesitant to remove
the
tweaking of the settings.
[*] Once in a while, about once or twice a year on average, I would
forward a message sent to me in HTML as HTML, to avoid loosing formatting.
Igor
Boris Liberman Wed, 11 May 2016 01:30:22 -0700 wrote:
Igor, YRC :-)
AquaMail is outstanding... But I don't
Igor, YRC :-)
AquaMail is outstanding... But I don't do much but reading and for that
GMail native app should be sufficient...
I'm giving it a try but it seems fine so far.
However if one does more than reading and very occasional writing, then
AquaMail is by far the better choice.
On 10 May 201
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Boris,
IIRC, you have been using Aquamail, haven't you?
(I've found it after seeing it in the signature from you... Or, was it
someone else here?)
In that case, that's the best app for Android I've seen, with great
support and smart developer.
Interesting, I've been usi
Boris,
IIRC, you have been using Aquamail, haven't you?
(I've found it after seeing it in the signature from you... Or,
was it someone else here?)
In that case, that's the best app for Android I've seen, with great
support and smart developer.
Igor
Boris Liberman Tue, 10 May 2016 09:53:08
is is becoming important because almost all email services default
to HTML text these days and they're (deliberately, in my opinion)
making it more difficult for users to change to plain text only.
They can take my plain text email when they pry it from my cold dead
fingers!
--
Science - Qu
or fell through the cracks...
On 10 May 2016 18:53, "Zos Xavius" wrote:
> Nope. Didn't get through. ;)
> On May 10, 2016 11:18 AM, "Boris Liberman" wrote:
>
> > do you copy?
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUB
cool... so I'm going to retire my 3rd party mailer for android now...
On 10 May 2016 18:24, "Bob Sullivan" wrote:
> reading you 5 by 9
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Boris Liberman
> wrote:
> > do you copy?
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mai
Herr Listmeister set the software to accept html, but it converts it to
plain text, IIRC.
On Tuesday, May 10, 2016, ann sanfedele wrote:
> Comic Sans! ack! feh!
>
> fortunately, I set the fonts for my incoming mail in Thunderbird...
>
> ann
>
>
> On 5/10/2016 11:
2016 at 10:00 AM, Daniel J. Matyola
wrote:
I use GMail, and usually I must select "plain text" or my post to the PDML
bounces.
This is a test message with "plain text" turned off, which I assume is
HTML.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue,
Nope. Didn't get through. ;)
On May 10, 2016 11:18 AM, "Boris Liberman" wrote:
> do you copy?
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
-
reading you 5 by 9
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> do you copy?
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
> the directions.
--
P
Looks like plain text... as the Flying Spaghetti Monster intended!
On May 10, 2016 11:12 AM, "Daniel J. Matyola" wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Darren Addy
wrote:
>
> > Now we can enjoy PDML emails in *Comic Sans*, as God
> > intended.
> >
>
> Let's see of that is true:
>
> *This i
do you copy?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
> Now we can enjoy PDML emails in *Comic Sans*, as God
> intended.
>
Let's see of that is true:
*This is in Comic Sans, as God intended.*
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pd
ounces.
>
> This is a test message with "plain text" turned off, which I assume is
> HTML.
>
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Darren Addy
> wrote:
>
> > I *think*.
> &g
I use GMail, and usually I must select "plain text" or my post to the PDML
bounces.
This is a test message with "plain text" turned off, which I assume is HTML.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Darren Addy
I *think*.
Test to see if it is going through.
--
“The Earth is Art, The Photographer is only a Witness ”
― Yann Arthus-Bertrand, Earth from Above
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link dir
ounce.
That said, I don't anticipate many error messages if I have it set the
way we want it.
Carry on, then.
On 5/10/16 9:02 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:01 AM, mike wilson wrote:
On 09 May 2016 at 22:08 Matthew Hunt wrote:
Dropping HTML email without notifying t
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:01 AM, mike wilson wrote:
>> On 09 May 2016 at 22:08 Matthew Hunt wrote:
>>
>> Dropping HTML email without notifying the user of the problem is
>> broken. I'm glad to see an effort to fix it, whether the solution is
>> sending HTML to
t because almost all email services default
to HTML text these days and they're (deliberately, in my opinion)
making it more difficult for users to change to plain text only.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdm
> On 09 May 2016 at 22:08 Matthew Hunt wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:56 PM, John wrote:
>
> > Isn't there some old engineering proverb that goes something like "If it
> > ain't broke, don't fix it" ?
>
> Dropping HTML email
pretty quickly.
Cheers,
Dave
> On May 10, 2016, at 3:47 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> Looking into it in more depth reveals that allowing HTML through Mailman (our
> list software) entails suspending content filtering, which then allows file
> attachments through. I am hesitan
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:56 PM, John wrote:
> Isn't there some old engineering proverb that goes something like "If it
> ain't broke, don't fix it" ?
Dropping HTML email without notifying the user of the problem is
broken. I'm glad to see an effort to fix
Isn't there some old engineering proverb that goes something like "If it
ain't broke, don't fix it" ?
On 5/9/2016 11:47 AM, Doug Brewer wrote:
Looking into it in more depth reveals that allowing HTML through Mailman
(our list software) entails suspending content fil
On 9 May 2016, at 16:49, Doug Brewer wrote:
>
>
> Note that this is not list policy I'm talking about, but rather my personal
> preference. I'm willing to take into consideration arguments for and against
> the ability to experience pink 36pt fonts for the PDML.
Well, it would encourage more
I'm perfectly fine with any arrangement. If we go HTML, I'll be able to get
rid of special mailer that I have on my cell phone, because GMail default
client on android cannot send plain text.
Otherwise, my life won't change either way :-).
Just sayin'...
Sent with AquaM
Looking into it in more depth reveals that allowing HTML through Mailman
(our list software) entails suspending content filtering, which then
allows file attachments through. I am hesitant to remove the filtering,
imagining all sorts of trouble with attachments, not least of which
would be the
already done... no go
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On 9 May 2016 18:00:17 Mark Roberts wrote:
By the way: If someone could try sending HTML email to The List to see
if it gets through it would be most helpful.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multim
By the way: If someone could try sending HTML email to The List to see
if it gets through it would be most helpful.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antiv
Roberts, Mark wrote:
From: PDML [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] on behalf of Larry Colen [l...@red4est.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 8, 2016 10:11 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: HTML testing
Doug Brewer wrote:
Hi, kids, we're just checking to s
> On 09 May 2016 at 03:17 "Roberts, Mark" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> From: PDML [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] on behalf of Larry Colen [l...@red4est.com]
> Sent: Sunday, May 8, 2016 10:11 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subje
Mark! "We are in control"
Now that is a worry.
Philip Northeast
www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au
On 9/05/2016 12:03 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
Hi, kids, we're just checking to see if formatted text will now come
through to the PDML.
Carry on as if nothing has happened. Do not adjust your sets. We a
From: PDML [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] on behalf of Larry Colen [l...@red4est.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 8, 2016 10:11 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: HTML testing
Doug Brewer wrote:
> Hi, kids, we're just checking to see if formatted text
Doug Brewer wrote:
Hi, kids, we're just checking to see if formatted text will now come
through to the PDML.
Carry on as if nothing has happened. Do not adjust your sets. We are in
control.
I'm always learning new and interesting things on this list, for example
this usage of the phrase "in
Hi, kids, we're just checking to see if formatted text will now come
through to the PDML.
Carry on as if nothing has happened. Do not adjust your sets. We are in
control.
Thanks
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
My web site pictures section
(http://boris.liberman-family.com/pics/index.html) is auto-generated by
JAlbum (which up until version 10.x was free, now it is not exactly
free) and has very similar layout. The additional benefit as Roman
mentioned is integrated workflow, where e.g. it automatical
There is the minor detail that I was the official event photographer.
Joseph McAllister wrote:
>True to LC form.
>
>Three others have a number of images. 36, 3, and 2.
>
>Larry has a number of ALBUMS of images! 10 albums.
>
>Beating the competition down with massive weights.
>
>
>On Oct 19, 20
True to LC form.
Three others have a number of images. 36, 3, and 2.
Larry has a number of ALBUMS of images! 10 albums.
Beating the competition down with massive weights.
On Oct 19, 2012, at 00:33 , Larry Colen wrote:
> A friend posted my photos of the SFLX, and I noticed that the photo alb
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:38 AM, David Mann wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>> A friend posted my photos of the SFLX, and I noticed that the photo albums
>> were generated with a perl script. I figured that it might be useful to a
>> few other on the PDML:
>>
>> http
My gdgphoto.com website is next best thing to abandoned ... I'm not
updating it anymore, haven't in some years now, and will let the
GoDaddy.com account expire next February after I shift the domain
names to another registrar.
What I think I'll do is just open an account on SmugMug or similar,
and
On Oct 19, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> A friend posted my photos of the SFLX, and I noticed that the photo albums
> were generated with a perl script. I figured that it might be useful to a
> few other on the PDML:
>
> http://marginalhacks.com/Hacks/album/
>
> This is what the out
A friend posted my photos of the SFLX, and I noticed that the photo albums were
generated with a perl script. I figured that it might be useful to a few other
on the PDML:
http://marginalhacks.com/Hacks/album/
This is what the output looks like:
http://sflindyexchange.com/2012/Photos/
--
La
1/2011 1:23 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:24 PM, "P. J. Alling"
wrote:
The dropbox boys have removed "Get Public Link" and replaced it with a
new and improved "Get Shareable Link" command. This does two
things, it
gives a "Tin
; machine, but I attribute that to it's Ancient operating system, (Win2K).
> >>
> >> On 12/1/2011 1:23 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:24 PM, "P. J. Alling"
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> The dropbox boys
does two
things, it
gives a "Tiny URL" like address, but when you click on that link it
displays the HTML code of your web page, and asks if you want to
download it, rather than allowing the browser to display the page. I
find this to be very annoying. I've left a message on their
e:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:24 PM, "P. J. Alling"
wrote:
The dropbox boys have removed "Get Public Link" and replaced it with a
new and improved "Get Shareable Link" command. This does two
things, it
gives a "Tiny URL" like address, but when
quot; command. This does two things, it
gives a "Tiny URL" like address, but when you click on that link it
displays the HTML code of your web page, and asks if you want to
download it, rather than allowing the browser to display the page. I
find this to be very annoying. I've left a m
s, but when you click on that link it
> displays the HTML code of your web page, and asks if you want to
> download it, rather than allowing the browser to display the page. I
> find this to be very annoying. I've left a message on their forum
> explaining the problem and
The dropbox boys have removed "Get Public Link" and replaced it with a
new and improved "Get Shareable Link" command. This does two things, it
gives a "Tiny URL" like address, but when you click on that link it
displays the HTML code of your web page, and as
I believe it is the Winehouse era aka the beehive era aka the 50?
Cheers
Ecke
2010/7/11 Ann Sanfedele :
>
>
> Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
>> another pair of snaps from my non-camera... with your choice of tiny url
>> or straight from the gate links
>> for each
>>
>> How hot was it???
>>
>> http://tinyu
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
another pair of snaps from my non-camera... with your choice of tiny
url or straight from the gate links
for each
How hot was it???
http://tinyurl.com/2vjdgzv
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/cell-phone-snaps/12420035_MC2ch/1/930797176_cEirN/Medium
Thanks a lot for the suggestions, guys!
Looking it all up and learning more now.
Good light!
fra
10:38 2005.03.19 -0500, you wrote:
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:42:16 +0100
From: Frantisek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: PDML
Subject: OT: HTML/JS help
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
sorry to ask this on PDML, but ther
Frantisek mused:
>
> Hi,
>sorry to ask this on PDML, but there are some pretty technical
>people here. And it's concerning photography, at least the showing
>of photographs on the web :-)
My immediate impression is that you're using the wrong tool:
instead of a client-side (JavaScript
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:42:16 +0100, Frantisek wrote:
>(using 'array' in JS), but how to make the title name of the
>randomly selected photo differenciated from the rest of the list
>(e.g. bold) while changing the image link so clicking on the image
>would take the viewer to the cor
but how to make the title name of the
randomly selected photo differenciated from the rest of the list
(e.g. bold) while changing the image link so clicking on the image
would take the viewer to the correct picture?
Sorry for such a non-photographic question, and sorry for such a
dumb ht
Doug Franklin wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:54:57 -0500, Jeff Tokayer wrote:
>
> > My mail program just prompted me to send emails to the group in plain
> > text, because some members are unable to handle HTML.
> > I've been off the group for over a year, but did
On 5/1/05, Jeff Tokayer, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I didn't realize that HTML was a security risk. I was under the
>impression that people avoided HTML because of the file size.
>
>I've changed to a Mac and find that my mail reader Thunderbird gives me
>a secure env
On 5/1/05, Jeff Tokayer, discombobulated, unleashed:
>My mail program just prompted me to send emails to the group in plain
>text, because some members are unable to handle HTML.
>I've been off the group for over a year, but didn't realize that this
>was still an issue wit
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Tokayer" Subject: HTML
My mail program just prompted me to send emails to the group in
plain text, because some members are unable to handle HTML.
I've been off the group for over a year, but didn't realize that
this was stil
Like DougF I've enjoyed working in the tech industry for over 20 years. Fun
field. Most of the time.
The biggest issue I've had with HTML emails is not the reception of a virus,
worm, or other questionable item. (Fortunately my ISP resolves those matters
for me.) Rather,
spamme
out of his own pocket) $20 a year to
subscribe, he may consider opening it up to html.
Of course those 400 people who already complain that the bandwidth used by the
list is too much would undoubtedly unsubscribe. Then there are the folks whose
mail starts to bounce in a couple of days because
t implements NAT and blocks virtually all
>incoming TCP and UDP ports
Check
>C. My computers scan all files for viruses with two scanners
Check
>D. HTML email goes straight to the bit bucket
.. or, at least, gets filtered and quarantined
>E. Any email attachmen
Jeff Tokayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My mail program just prompted me to send emails to the group in plain
> text, because some members are unable to handle HTML.
> I've been off the group for over a year, but didn't realize that this
> was still an issue with
Hi,
D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
womdigious
cruft
[expletive]ed
Vocabulary lessons at 8AM. Lovely way to start the day. 8-)
mike
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 03/01/2005
in my defense
system are:
I. Technical
A. My ISP scans email for viruses
B. My computers are isolated from the Internet connection with
a firewall that implements NAT and blocks virtually all
incoming TCP and UDP ports
C. My computers scan all files for viruses with two sc
In a message dated 1/5/2005 9:37:44 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not necessarily a simple privacy exposure. With the recent
vulnerabilities discovered in the decoding of a couple of different
types of graphic files (PNG, I think, and maybe JPG), the "load an
image from a fo
recipient's address to let
> the spammer know that that message was opened and viewed in
> an HTML-aware MUA -- that the address does actually reach a
> human.
Not necessarily a simple privacy exposure. With the recent
vulnerabilities discovered in the decoding of a couple of differ
Jeff Tokayer wrote:
> I didn't realize that HTML was a security risk. I was under the
> impression that people avoided HTML because of the file size.
Some MUAs are vulnerable to embedded Javascript in HTML email.
Using a Mac *probably* decreases that risk to reasonable levels,
but I&
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:19:17 -0500, Jeff Tokayer wrote:
> I didn't realize that HTML was a security risk. I was under the
> impression that people avoided HTML because of the file size.
That's probably the most common reason, along with the unevenness of
the implementations
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:16:29 -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> In what way is HTML email a security risk.
"Web bugs" (invisible 1x1 graphics that identify you as a 'live'
machine), javascript payloads, VBScript payloads, auto-run executable
payloads, ... namely nearl
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:54:57 -0500, Jeff Tokayer wrote:
My mail program just prompted me to send emails to the group in plain
text, because some members are unable to handle HTML.
I've been off the group for over a year, but didn't realize that this
was stil
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
