Don't do that too often but...
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, John Francis wrote:
> After all, the FA* 80-200/f2.8 didn't cost that much.
Mark!
Kostas (buying three built-in electrical appliances and getting change
instead)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan
van Wijk
Sent: 5. januar 2007 20:00
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D and DA 50-200 and AF performance
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 01:12:38 +0900, David Savage wrote:
>I can't comment on the K10
egian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joseph Tainter
Sent: 5. januar 2007 19:00
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D and DA 50-200 and AF performance
So what do I do? By the zoom of my dreams, the DA* and use
it on my DS.
-
Tim, we don'
scuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D and DA 50-200 and AF performance
Hi!
Tim Øsleby wrote:
> I'm debating with myself.
> I have an urge for the K10 (who doesn't?). I've also got a need for an AF
> tele zoom for soccer, birds in flight and general use.
>
> The obvious
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 01:12:38 +0900, David Savage wrote:
>I can't comment on the K10D & DA 50-200 combination, but I suspect the
>DA* lenses are going to cost quite a bit more than the price of the
>K10D. My guess for the DA* 60-250 f4, at least 2-3 times the cost of
>the K10D.
Hmm, perhaps ...
Ho
I hope I'm way off.
Dave
On 1/6/07, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think (and hope) that's a bit of an overestimate.
> I'd guess that 2x the (current) price of the K10D is
> the upper end of the price range, and it may even end
> up just a little cheaper than that. After all, the
Hi!
Tim Øsleby wrote:
> I'm debating with myself.
> I have an urge for the K10 (who doesn't?). I've also got a need for an AF
> tele zoom for soccer, birds in flight and general use.
>
> The obvious solutions for those two needs is a combo of K10 and DA* 60-250.
> In a long perspective it is ve
So what do I do? By the zoom of my dreams, the DA* and use
it on my DS.
-
Tim, we don't know yet whether DA* lenses will autofocus with bodies
prior to the K10D. The first DA* lenses are due to be issued in March.
We should know then.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
I think (and hope) that's a bit of an overestimate.
I'd guess that 2x the (current) price of the K10D is
the upper end of the price range, and it may even end
up just a little cheaper than that. After all, the
FA* 80-200/f2.8 (with a larger front element than a
60-250/f4) didn't cost that much.
I rather doubt that the 60-250 will be available in six-seven months.
In any case, if you want to rely on auto-focus, you should get the
K10D - with the more powerful focus motor it will operate faster than
any of the earlier models, even before the DA* SDM lenses come along.
I've shot kid's socc
That would be splendid.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thibouille
Sent: 5. januar 2007 17:37
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D and DA 50-200 and AF performance
I only played a
I only played a bit with this combo as I only got my K10D yesterday
but AF is at least quite a bit beter than on my ist-D.
I play a bit with it tonight in interior and I let you know if I come
to any conclusion.
2007/1/5, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm debating with myself.
> I have an urg
just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5. januar 2007 17:15
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D and DA 50-200 and AF performance
I've found the autofocus performance of the DA 50-200 to be q
I've found the autofocus performance of the DA 50-200 to be quite good, even in
continuous mode. I shot a bunch of pics of my granddaughter running around the
yard with this combo last week. As a bit of a test I also shot a car driving
down the street and a bicyclist approaching. The camera was
I can't comment on the K10D & DA 50-200 combination, but I suspect the
DA* lenses are going to cost quite a bit more than the price of the
K10D. My guess for the DA* 60-250 f4, at least 2-3 times the cost of
the K10D.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/6/07, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm debating w
I'm debating with myself.
I have an urge for the K10 (who doesn't?). I've also got a need for an AF
tele zoom for soccer, birds in flight and general use.
The obvious solutions for those two needs is a combo of K10 and DA* 60-250.
In a long perspective it is very likely I'll go for this combo, b
16 matches
Mail list logo
