Very nice. Pretty girl, nicely posed, excellent conversion. If I were to look
for something I might want to add, it would be a bit of fill to lighten the
shadows.
OK, since you guys say I can put up something that wasn't shot with
Pentax, here's one of my studio shots. This was taken week
This comment will likely hold the indoor nitpicking record forever, but
I'd like the bracelet removed.
Might even prefer she be barefoot. Nothing but the sheath dress.
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, since you guys say I can put up something that wasn't shot with
Pentax,
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice. Pretty girl, nicely posed, excellent conversion. If I
were to look for something I might want to add, it would be a bit
of fill to lighten the shadows.
I've been doing a lot of work lately with just a single light. In
In a message dated 11/17/2005 7:50:52 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, since you guys say I can put up something that wasn't shot with
Pentax, here's one of my studio shots. This was taken week before
last for the model's portfolio.
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
This comment will likely hold the indoor nitpicking record forever,
but
I'd like the bracelet removed.
That's what Photoshop is for!
Might even prefer she be barefoot.
We tried that. Neither of us liked it.
Nothing but the sheath
Bob Shell wrote:
OK, since you guys say I can put up something that wasn't shot with
Pentax, here's one of my studio shots. This was taken week before last
for the model's portfolio.
http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/IMG_9148bw.jpg
Bob
Great shot.
-Adam
Are you using the larger version of Illuminata?
rg
Bob Shell wrote:
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice. Pretty girl, nicely posed, excellent conversion. If I were
to look for something I might want to add, it would be a bit of fill
to lighten the shadows.
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:31 AM, Gonz wrote:
Are you using the larger version of Illuminata?
rg
I have both sizes, but this was shot using the 36 inch version. The
light is about five feet from the model.
Bob
Bob Shell wrote:
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you try something like pulling her bare feet a bit forward out of
the shadows (I like the shadowy background), resting them sort of on
their side (left foot partially behind the right) with a slight
tension-free arch and toes gently pointed?
Funny would not have been my reaction to her request
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Did you try something like pulling her bare feet a bit forward out of
the shadows (I like the shadowy background), resting them sort of on
their side (left foot partially behind the right) with a slight
tension-free arch and toes gently pointed?
clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Bob Shell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17. november 2005 16:50
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: My first PESO
OK, since you guys say I can put up something that wasn't shot with
Pentax, here's one of my studio shots. This was taken week
Hello Bob,
There is a lot to like here. This is well done - nothing jumps out at
me as a problem. Very nice work!
--
Bruce
Thursday, November 17, 2005, 7:49:32 AM, you wrote:
BS OK, since you guys say I can put up something that wasn't shot with
BS Pentax, here's one of my studio shots.
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
I like the picture.
But I can't help thinking, what is it for? If it was me (God
forbid), or my
beloved, or my offspring, it is not the kind of photo I would have
hanging
on my wall. I'm not saying anything is wrong, I'm only asking
because
freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Bob Shell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17. november 2005 17:57
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: My first PESO
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Did you try something like
On Nov 17, 2005, at 12:14 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
When I see the photo posted here, I know the answer for my question
in my
previous post ;-)
BTW. Think I prefer the first one. Never been a fan of girls
posing like
statues photos.
It's all a matter of personal tastes. That standing nude
Well they let me stay,even with the Nikon equipment i have.LOL
Very nice shot Bob.
I like the framing and pose very much. Nice background. Just enought to see
that something
is there,
but not take away from the shot.
Dave
OK, since you guys say I can put
Bob Shell penned:
I've been doing a lot of work lately with just a single light. In
this case a single AlienBees flash head with a Photek Illuminata II
softbox (http://www.photekusa.com/), a unique softbox that I have
fallen in love with. When I
Re your standing nude: a classic, timeless style. Very nice!
As well, I agree about the American magazines being afraid to publish nudes
these days. Hopefully the current nervous climate won't last forever.
Pat White
Nice!
Sorta kidding alert!! Did you try, somehow, hiding one arm to match the
one leg look?
Thanks for allowing my presumptuous suggestions.
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 17, 2005, at 11:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Did you try something like pulling her bare feet a bit
On 17/11/05, Bob Shell, discombobulated, unleashed:
OK, since you guys say I can put up something that wasn't shot with
Pentax, here's one of my studio shots. This was taken week before
last for the model's portfolio.
http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/IMG_9148bw.jpg
Very nice Bob - the floor
On Nov 17, 2005, at 7:49 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/IMG_9148bw.jpg
Hmm. Something about this one is simply not working to my eye. The
perspective is off, it seems unbalanced to me, shot from too high an
eye level. The standing nude you posted is a much better
At first glance, though I like the lighting and the pose, the shot seems
to be off in some way. I'm thinking it's because of the left-leaning
bottom to top diagonal, combined with her placement in the frame, makes
it appear as if she's about to fall out of the picture to her right. I
think I
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: My first PESO
On Nov 17, 2005, at 7:49 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/IMG_9148bw.jpg
Hmm. Something about this one
On Nov 17, 2005, at 5:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the kind of work i would like to learn,studio lighting and
poses,but none of the
night schools
around here offer it anymore. Not enough interest i suppose.:-(
Where are you located? Several times a year I do workshops for
On Nov 17, 2005, at 12:58 PM, Pat White wrote:
Re your standing nude: a classic, timeless style. Very nice!
Thanks!
As well, I agree about the American magazines being afraid to
publish nudes these days. Hopefully the current nervous climate
won't last forever.
Well if we can't
On Nov 17, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Nice!
Sorta kidding alert!! Did you try, somehow, hiding one arm to match
the
one leg look?
We did try some with a cape she had, but I didn't consider them
successful.
Thanks for allowing my presumptuous suggestions.
Nothing
On Nov 17, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Cotty wrote:
Very nice Bob - the floor covering is a small nit for me.
I forgot to bring my large nit with me that day.
Bob
On Nov 17, 2005, at 1:56 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/IMG_9148bw.jpg
Hmm. Something about this one is simply not working to my eye. The
perspective is off, it seems unbalanced to me, shot from too high
an eye level. The standing nude you posted is a much
On Nov 17, 2005, at 2:13 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
At first glance, though I like the lighting and the pose, the shot
seems to be off in some way. I'm thinking it's because of the left-
leaning bottom to top diagonal, combined with her placement in the
frame, makes it appear as if she's about
In a message dated 11/17/2005 9:15:45 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BTW. Think I prefer the first one. Never been a fan of girls posing like
statues photos.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
=
Thanks for nailing it down for me. Neither one, to my eye,
On 11/17/05, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, since you guys say I can put up something that wasn't shot with
Pentax, here's one of my studio shots. This was taken week before
last for the model's portfolio.
http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/IMG_9148bw.jpg
Bob
Gorgeous, Bob!!
cheers,
Bob,
Let me note, I looked at the 'portfolio' as just that. While I like the
statuesque nude shot somewhat better, as a class of photograph, the
chair shot is more appropriate to it's intended use.
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 17, 2005, at 1:04 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Sounds to me that, at least, you're 'centered.'
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 17, 2005, at 2:13 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
At first glance, though I like the lighting and the pose, the shot
seems to be off in some way. I'm thinking it's because of the left-
On Nov 17, 2005, at 12:16 PM, Bob Shell wrote:
http://www.bobshell.com/PESO/IMG_9148bw.jpg
Hmm. Something about this one is simply not working to my eye. The
perspective is off, it seems unbalanced to me, shot from too high
an eye level. The standing nude you posted is a much better
On Nov 17, 2005, at 4:38 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On 11/17/05, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, since you guys say I can put up something that wasn't shot with
Pentax, here's one of my studio shots. This was taken week before
last for the model's portfolio.
On Nov 17, 2005, at 4:41 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Bob,
Let me note, I looked at the 'portfolio' as just that. While I like
the
statuesque nude shot somewhat better, as a class of photograph, the
chair shot is more appropriate to it's intended use.
Jack
Yes. I normally advise models not to
On Nov 17, 2005, at 3:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for nailing it down for me. Neither one, to my eye, looks like
anything more than female statuary. Nice for men to look at I
suppose, but no
personality, no life, no eye contact, no emotion, no sense of who
the real-life
On Nov 17, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Your eyepoint is about an inch or two higher than mine, most likely
(I'm 6'). For this kind of photo, I would likely have worked either
a little closer in/crouched a bit or from a more waist-level
perspective.
I used to crouch down
Bob wrote:
Anyway, it is sort of a tradition in painting and photography that artistic
nudes not make eye contact with the camera.
That used to be one of the factors separating art from porn: eye contact =
porn, no eye contact = art. Another was, color = porn, BW = art.
Hopefully, things
- Original Message -
From: Pat White
Subject: Re: My first PESO
That used to be one of the factors separating art from porn: eye contact
= porn, no eye contact = art. Another was, color = porn, BW = art.
Hopefully, things aren't that superficial anymore.
Now it's anyone pre
In a message dated 8/18/2005 2:29:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 18/8/05, Manuel Magalhães , discombobulated, unleashed:
Something was missing,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/35146415/
Sorry,
Manuel
I like it Manuel, but you know what? If you
Hi all,
During my vacations I bought a F35-135mm 3.5-4.5 in an old shop to an old
guy, in Andorra.
As I said before it is a brand new lens with more or less 15 years old.
So here is one shot taken in Bilbao Spain.
Comments are welcome.
Manuel
Something was missing,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/35146415/
Sorry,
Manuel
---Mensagem original---
De: Manuel Magalhães
Data: 08/18/05 22:04:01
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: Peso: My First Peso
Hi all,
During my vacations I bought a F35-135mm 3.5-4.5
The URL?
Jack
--- Manuel Magalhães [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
During my vacations I bought a F35-135mm 3.5-4.5 in
an old shop to an old
guy, in Andorra.
As I said before it is a brand new lens with more or
less 15 years old.
So here is one shot taken in Bilbao Spain.
PROTECTED]/35146415/
Sorry,
Manuel
---Mensagem original---
De: Manuel Magalhães
Data: 08/18/05 22:04:01
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: Peso: My First Peso
Hi all,
During my vacations I bought a F35-135mm 3.5-4.5 in an old shop to an old
guy, in Andorra.
As I said before
they were produced?
Very interesting!
keith whaley
---Mensagem original---
De: Manuel Magalhães
Data: 08/18/05 22:04:01
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: Peso: My First Peso
Hi all,
During my vacations I bought a F35-135mm 3.5-4.5 in an old shop to an old
guy, in Andorra.
As I said
22:04:01
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: Peso: My First Peso
Hi all,
During my vacations I bought a F35-135mm 3.5-4.5
in an old shop to an old
guy, in Andorra.
As I said before it is a brand new lens with more
or less 15 years old.
So here is one shot taken in Bilbao
At 05:05 PM 8/18/2005, Manuel Magalhães wrote:
Something was missing,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/35146415/
Sorry,
Manuel
---Mensagem original---
De: Manuel Magalhães
Data: 08/18/05 22:04:01
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: Peso: My First Peso
Hi all,
During my
On 18/8/05, Manuel Magalhães , discombobulated, unleashed:
Something was missing,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/35146415/
Sorry,
Manuel
I like it Manuel, but you know what? If you cropped that really tight,
just the kids and the water 'clouds' it would be a cracking shot.
@pdml.net
Assunto: Re: Fw: Peso: My First Peso
Very cool. Like the way you stopped the water at the perfect moment.
Good thing you didnt take that in the US, you may have been questioned
by the police. Did you read the discussion about this?
rg
Manuel Magalhães wrote:
Something was missing
---Mensagem original---
De: Cotty
Data: 08/18/05 22:30:37
Para: pentax list
Assunto: Re: Fw: Peso: My First Peso
On 18/8/05, Manuel Magalhães , discombobulated, unleashed:
Something was missing,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/35146415/
Sorry,
Manuel
I like
they were small jets of water coming from those holes in the ground
with different timings.
---Mensagem original---
De: keithw
Data: 08/18/05 22:19:10
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: Re: Fw: Peso: My First Peso
Manuel Magalhães wrote:
Something was missing,
http
)
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Magalhães [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18. august 2005 23:05
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Fw: Peso: My First Peso
Something was missing,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/35146415/
Sorry,
Manuel
---Mensagem original
No, it wasn't my intention but it's nice to have different eyes
looking at the same things seeing different perspectives,
Thanks Jack
Manuel
---Mensagem original---
De: Jack Davis
Data: 08/18/05 22:19:40
Para: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Assunto: Re: Fw: Peso: My First Peso
Manuel
How should I put this, it's very clear...
Manuel Magalhães wrote:
Hi all,
During my vacations I bought a F35-135mm 3.5-4.5 in an old shop to an old
guy, in Andorra.
As I said before it is a brand new lens with more or less 15 years old.
So here is one shot taken in Bilbao Spain.
Comments are
: My First Peso
Hi all,
During my vacations I bought a F35-135mm 3.5-4.5 in an old shop to an old
guy, in Andorra.
As I said before it is a brand new lens with more or less 15 years old.
So here is one shot taken in Bilbao Spain.
Comments are welcome.
Manuel
--
When you're worried
On 18/8/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's really neat... (I guess I'm showing my age).
Peter, for goodness sake, you're only twelve.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 18/8/05, Manuel Magalhães , discombobulated, unleashed:
I see. I'm going to try it.
Thanks
Manuel
What a guy!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Then I guess the word neat has come back around?
Cotty wrote:
On 18/8/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's really neat... (I guess I'm showing my age).
Peter, for goodness sake, you're only twelve.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Nice. The water clouds are intriguing and the dancing pairs are great.
I do think a good health crop to remove many of the background distractions
is called for though.
Thanks for sharing Manuel
Powell
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/35146415/
Manuel
On 18/8/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Then I guess the word neat has come back around?
Wouldn't surprise me. Not here (yet) though. 'Cool' is in, but it was in
in 1974 in the Bay Area when I was 14. 'Wicked' is in. Some things rub
off on our kids (mainly from the Simpsons) but
In a message dated 8/11/2005 1:06:54 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I just uploaded one of the images I shot with the *istDS. The picture was
shot at twilight, with the camera resting on the handrail of a balcony. The
image is of Huntington, West Virginia. I would
I like it a lot Glen. A nice calm relaxing picture postcard feel.
Well done.
Dave
On 8/12/05, Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I just uploaded one of the images I shot with the *istDS. The picture was
shot at twilight, with the camera resting on the handrail of a balcony. The
image
. This is different.
The skylines of NY or LA have been all shot up. This is fresh.
- Original Message - From: Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:06 PM
Subject: PESO: My First PESO
Hello,
I just uploaded one of the images I shot with the *istDS
]
Sendt: 12. august 2005 08:46
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: My First PESO
Agreed. Great picture. Sell it to the town tourist board, if there is
one.
John
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:45:03 +0100, Mark Stringer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice. It almost has a toy like quality like
On 8/11/05, Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I just uploaded one of the images I shot with the *istDS. The picture was
shot at twilight, with the camera resting on the handrail of a balcony. The
image is of Huntington, West Virginia. I would have preferred the skyline
of New York or LA,
Hello,
I just uploaded one of the images I shot with the *istDS. The picture was
shot at twilight, with the camera resting on the handrail of a balcony. The
image is of Huntington, West Virginia. I would have preferred the skyline
of New York or LA, but this is all I had to work with. ;-)
On 11/8/05, Glen, discombobulated, unleashed:
I just uploaded one of the images I shot with the *istDS. The picture was
shot at twilight, with the camera resting on the handrail of a balcony. The
image is of Huntington, West Virginia. I would have preferred the skyline
of New York or LA, but
Nice, but it looks over processed, more like a table top model, say for
an HO gauge railroad layout, than a real place...
Glen wrote:
Hello,
I just uploaded one of the images I shot with the *istDS. The picture
was shot at twilight, with the camera resting on the handrail of a
balcony. The
At 04:33 PM 8/11/2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
Nice, but it looks over processed, more like a table top model, say for an
HO gauge railroad layout, than a real place...
Hi PJ,
I assume that you know that Pullman Square refers to the railroad
industry? People in Huntington are very fond of
Excellent! In the near perfection of the square and the bright colors in which
it's rendered, it has an almost surreal quality to it. Great shot, well
executed.
Paul
On 11/8/05, Glen, discombobulated, unleashed:
I just uploaded one of the images I shot with the *istDS. The picture was
Well, yes I know about who Pullman was. It's not just the layout of the
square. Looking at the original, it looks like a noise reduction
program was used on the image at high settings and then it was over
sharpened, (at least that's what it looks like from the halos around so
many objects),
It's a really lovely shot. I love the star shapes in the street
lights; they add sparkle and interest to a very nice scene.
Glen wrote:
Hello,
I just uploaded one of the images I shot with the *istDS. The picture
was shot at twilight, with the camera resting on the handrail of a
balcony.
At 05:26 PM 8/11/2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
Well, yes I know about who Pullman was. It's not just the layout of the
square. Looking at the original, it looks like a noise reduction program
was used on the image at high settings and then it was over sharpened, (at
least that's what it looks
Hi Glen,
A very pleasing shot! Nice balance, composition and color. It feel real and
the lights are great. Thanks for sharing.
Tom C.
From: Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: My First PESO
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:06:00
: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:06 PM
Subject: PESO: My First PESO
Hello,
I just uploaded one of the images I shot with the *istDS. The picture was
shot at twilight, with the camera resting on the handrail of a balcony.
The image is of Huntington, West Virginia. I would have preferred
Interesting image. It almost looks like an illustration to me. What post
processing did you do?
Butch
At 07:45 PM 8/11/2005, Mark Stringer wrote:
Very nice. It almost has a toy like quality like it was part of an
extravagant model railroad setup. Very Americana. This is
different. The skylines of NY or LA have been all shot up. This is fresh.
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the kind words. Living
-
From: Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: My First PESO
Hello,
I just uploaded one of the images I shot with the *istDS. The picture was
shot at twilight, with the camera resting on the handrail of a balcony.
The
image is of Huntington, West Virginia. I would have preferred the skyline
Maybe so, but this is a great shot Glen.
Good compsition and exposure. Almost a Back to the Future feel to it.
Dave(wish we had more of these in Canada)Brooks
- Original Message -
From: Glen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: My First PESO
Glen wrote:
At 07:45 PM 8/11/2005, Mark Stringer wrote:
Very nice. It almost has a toy like quality like it was part of an
extravagant model railroad setup. Very Americana. This is
different. The skylines of NY or LA have been all shot up. This is
fresh.
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the
Nice, Glen. You got just the right time of day.
Joe
On 8/11/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice, but it looks over processed, more like a table top model, say for
an HO gauge railroad layout, than a real place...
My initial thoughts, exactly. But I like the way it looks. Very cool photo.
Glen wrote:
Hello,
I just
On Dec 10, 2004, at 11:48 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
A little work on the lighting in photoshop
would work wonders, there's some very nice
stuff here.
Thanks for the encouragement, and thanks to all for the comments. :-)
My dirty little secret is that those are straight from the camera. I
couldn't
Jon,
Brave of you to put the work up. You may be kidding,
but I think we all know such fright and hope at the
same time.
Grading on the curve, I'd have to pick #2. I believe
it has a bit of artistic edge due to the light
reflections falling in a larger, people free, expanse.
It has an 'alone' feel
(second try...)
and boy am I nervous. ;-)
Actually, the photos from the market in Prague got me thinking about
some photos I took a few weeks ago in Krakow's main market square. I
went there to shoot photos of the St. Mary's Church there, but the
umbrellas intrigued me. I shot a bunch, and
I like numbers three and six very much. They're simple and graphic.
The extensive foreground is interesting. The color is nice. I found
them quite pleasing.
Paul
--- Jon Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and boy am I nervous. ;-)
Actually, the photos from the market in Prague got
me thinking about
being so shy about posting my pics.
(About the ONLY thing I'm shy about!) ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Jon Glass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: my first PESO
and boy am I nervous. ;-)
Actually, the photos
and boy am I nervous. ;-)
Actually, the photos from the market in Prague got me thinking about
some photos I took a few weeks ago in Krakow's main market square. I
went there to shoot photos of the St. Mary's Church there, but the
umbrellas intrigued me. I shot a bunch, and these are the ones
I'm finally getting around to posting some pictures on
here for y'all to see. :)
http://wcuvax1.wcu.edu/~jm34966/photography/CHAMPION.JPG
It's an Electro-Motive Division of General Motors
(EMD) E-6 locomotive, formerly belonging to the
Atlantic Coast Line Railway. It was probably built in
the
My God, it's a powerful throbbing purple...
Jon M wrote:
I'm finally getting around to posting some pictures on
here for y'all to see. :)
http://wcuvax1.wcu.edu/~jm34966/photography/CHAMPION.JPG
It's an Electro-Motive Division of General Motors
(EMD) E-6 locomotive, formerly belonging to the
201 - 291 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
