: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:56:03 -0700
I don't use either MS Word or WordPerfect. Never used either
glaring deficiencies...
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:56:03 -0700
I don't use
I agree, hence my referring to the Libertarian Party as a bunch of kooks. I'm a
pragmatist despite my libertarian tendencies, and I agree with Lazarus Long
that government should strive to do the least evil, not the most good.
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
Libertarian philosophy works well in
.
Tom C.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA)
?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:20:34 -0400
Why? Pentax has never been
-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even
under NDA) ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:56:03 -0700
I don't use either MS Word or WordPerfect. Never used either,
actually. I do most of my
So these lenses were just introduced for market hype?
-
No, the lenses are very, very good. As for SDM, it is quiet, almost spooky
until you are used to it. I think that once a suite a telephoto DA* lenses with
SDM are available, wildlife shooters will like the quiet. Other than that, I
their toll, unless something changes quickly.
Tom C.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:20:34
take their toll, unless something changes quickly.
Tom C.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA)
?
Date: Tue
know this. :-)
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:56:11 -0700
Photographs are my stock
Barbarians! Sewing people together like garments!
- Dr. (Bones) McCoy
Remember when photography was about a light tight box with a lens to make it
better than a pinhole and a shutter to control exposure (mainly)? You
actually had to know something about light! You couldn't complain that the
their toll, unless something changes quickly.
Tom C.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under
NDA) ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under
NDA) ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:20:34 -0400
Why? Pentax has never been a player in the Pro 35mm market. Not being
one now will make little difference.
I expect to see them
Op Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:00:21 +0200 schreef jtainter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I shoot. So I'd like to have the option to turn shaft drive on and off.
That way I can hear whether or not the lenses focuses.
There used to be a 'focus confirmation beep', at least on the film SLR's.
Is it gone?
--
I shoot. So I'd like to have the option to turn shaft drive on and off.
That way I can hear whether or not the lenses focuses.
There used to be a 'focus confirmation beep', at least on the film SLR's.
Is it gone?
--
Regards, Lucas
-
Oh, that is the first thing I turn off on every
Since this has evolved into a WP thread I guess I will comment.
I personally used to prefer LyX, but of course it was only a front end to
LaTeX.
Now LaTeX was the way to go if you were writing long articles, like say a 100
volume encyclopedia. Then I realized that nothing I wrote was more than
-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under
NDA) ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:20:34 -0400
Why? Pentax has never been a player in the Pro 35mm market. Not being
one now will make little
Persons have rights granted by God or arising simply by human birth,
whichever bois your water. Rights secured are liberty. Just governments are
instituted among people deriving there powers from the consent of the people
to secure these rights resulting in liberty. Governments have NO rights -
changes quickly.
Tom C.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under
NDA) ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:20:34 -0400
Why
graywolf wrote:
Now LaTeX was the way to go
I like the way you think!
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
I thought the era of arcane knowledge was just beginning, say the right
incantation and the picture appears. What is actually happening is
obscured by the technology.
Bob Blakely wrote:
Barbarians! Sewing people together like garments!
- Dr. (Bones) McCoy
Remember when photography was
LOL... I've never turned it off.
Tom C.
From: jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA)?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:34:25 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
I shoot. So I'd
What point am I arguing?
I find Word to be nearly impenetrable in its options, it's much much
easier to write when I don't have all that nonsense to deal with.
Since I only very rarely deliver formatted documents, I write and
deliver most textual work as ASCII text. When I do have to
My istD, K10D and D200 all have the beeps turned on. The others have
no beat, er beeps,
Dave
On 10/16/07, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:00:21 +0200 schreef jtainter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I shoot. So I'd like to have the option to turn shaft drive on and off.
I shoot. So I'd like to have the option to turn shaft drive on and
off. That way I can hear whether or not the lenses focuses.
There used to be a 'focus confirmation beep', at least on the film
SLR's. Is it gone?
Oh, that is the first thing I turn off on every camera. I would rather
Let's see:
1. Word Processing software
2. Political orientations
3. Sci Fi quotes
4. Some discussion of DSLR design.
5. Some name calling
Yep, typical PDML thread. VBG
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On Oct 16, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
I shoot. So I'd like to have the option to turn shaft drive on and
off. That way I can hear whether or not the lenses focuses.
There used to be a 'focus confirmation beep', at least on the film
SLR's. Is it gone?
Oh, that is the first
Well, maybe it's just me but when I look through my older MF cameras
like the 645 it's much easier to tell if the image is actually in focus.
The focusing screens seemed better, not mention the split prism stuff.
Unfortunately, I made the mistake of looking through my MX to confirm
this. Sigh.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke
Put the magic little card in the camera. Point the camera at anything,
anywhere. Press the thingy and, voila! The magic is performed. The camera
has become a witches cauldron for images.
Regards,
Bob...
Not if he tells me to bend over and cough!
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
graywolf wrote:
will
finally
take their toll, unless something changes quickly.
Tom C.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under
NDA
I picked up my P645 with the 45mm lens on it. Seems just as easy to
see whether it's in focus as the K10D with the 43mm lens. Of course,
the screen is a lot bigger.
I never used focusing aids, find them distracting. My P645 screen is
a matte screen just like the K10D screen.
But this ease
On Oct 16, 2007, at 11:50 AM, Bob Blakely wrote:
Put the magic little card in the camera. Point the camera at anything,
anywhere. Press the thingy and, voila! The magic is performed. The
camera
has become a witches cauldron for images.
Seems to me that's how the vast majority of people
something changes quickly.
Tom C.
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:20:34 -0400
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
What point am I arguing?
I find Word to be nearly impenetrable in its options, it's much much
easier to write when I don't have all that nonsense to deal with.
Since I only very rarely deliver formatted documents, I write and
deliver most textual work as ASCII
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:00:21 +0200 schreef jtainter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I shoot. So I'd like to have the option to turn shaft drive on and off.
That way I can hear whether or not the lenses focuses.
There used to be a 'focus confirmation beep', at least on the
Not 50 years ago. Not with your H1, H1A, H2, H3, H3V. Of course that WAS 50
years ago. That was back when one had to obtain at least a modicum of
proficiency to get reliable results.
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it
On Oct 16, 2007, at 12:06 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Wordpad on the PC has that mostly covered. I forget what the OS X
equivalent is, but it's pretty good. For pure RTF stuff,
Thunderbird is pretty darned good as well.
TextEdit delivered with Mac OS X does ASCII text or .RTF/.RTFD/.DOC
I blame the school system, (and television, and computers...)
Bob Blakely wrote:
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke
Put the magic little card in the camera. Point the camera at anything,
anywhere. Press the thingy and, voila! The magic
Generally I find beeps and other artificial camera sounds distracting
so I turn them off. However, if I need some way for the camera to
inform me that it's locked focus when my eye is not at the
viewfinder, or I cannot see the focus on screen or the indicator
light, I turn on the focus
You still need a modicum of proficiency to get reliable, decent
results. It's just the criteria for what is considered minimally
reliable and decent has been raised by many many notches. ;-)
G
On Oct 16, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Bob Blakely wrote:
Not 50 years ago. Not with your H1, H1A, H2, H3,
Focus confirmation seems to pretty much shut down when I'm using my
600mm f8 lens.
Tom C wrote:
Generally I find beeps and other artificial camera sounds distracting
so I turn them off. However, if I need some way for the camera to
inform me that it's locked focus when my eye is not at the
On 10/16/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generally I find beeps and other artificial camera sounds distracting
so I turn them off. However, if I need some way for the camera to
inform me that it's locked focus when my eye is not at the
viewfinder, or I cannot see the focus on screen or the
Cotty wrote:
On 16/10/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm a Doctor not a Sturgeon.
There's something fishy going on here
Well it certainly smelts like it.
--
Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 16/10/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm a Doctor not a Sturgeon.
There's something fishy going on here
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Better get your ducks in a roe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of P.
J. Alling
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 4:07 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
Cotty wrote:
On 16
Cotty wrote:
I'm a Doctor not a Sturgeon.
There's something fishy going on here
Well it certainly smelts like it.
Better get your ducks in a roe
I don't think you understand the scale of the problem.
I believe I'll be
On Oct 16, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Cotty wrote:
I'm a Doctor not a Sturgeon.
There's something fishy going on here
Well it certainly smelts like it.
Better get your ducks in a roe
I don't think you understand the scale of the problem.
Oh jeez, another thread gone to eel.
Godfrey
--
I'm a Doctor not a Sturgeon.
There's something fishy going on here
Well it certainly smelts like it.
Better get your ducks in a roe
I don't think you understand the scale of the problem.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
-- Original message --
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm a Doctor not a Sturgeon.
There's something fishy going on here
Well it certainly smelts like it.
Better get your ducks in a roe
I don't think you understand the scale of
On Oct 16, 2007, at 13:30, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
But this all seems so ridiculous. I mean, heck, if you're looking
through the viewfinder and you can't see whether the image is in
focus, why bother with an SLR? Are you that dependent upon auto focus
systems?
When I was on a trip to China a
On 16/10/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm a Doctor not a Sturgeon.
There's something fishy going on here
Cheers,
Cotty
You're spawning new ones.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
It's a hard roe for him to hoe.
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm a Doctor not a Sturgeon.
Bob Blakely wrote:
It's a hard roe for him to hoe.
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the US, the document from the people granting specific powers to the
government for the sake of liberty is called The Constitution. It's a
great document, even allowing for amendment
should times change and the need arise. I wish it was used here in the
At that time, we were a union of separate states. The states chose to ratify
the Constitution as they saw fit via the representation methods they had.
Remember, they were independent. We became, essentially, a country of
countries.
Regards,
Bob...
Cotty wrote:
I'm a Doctor not a Sturgeon.
There's something fishy going on here
Well it certainly smelts like it.
Better get your ducks in a roe
I don't think you understand the scale of the problem.
These pun threads are so bass ackwards!
--
Christian
differentiates them again from the populace they may 'serve'.
A cynical view of course.
Tom C.
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA
Actually the Constitution itself does not limit the governments powers, it is
the Bill of Rights that does that. And the revolutionary fathers forced that
through against quite a bit of opposition, if I remember my history correctly.
Tom C wrote:
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the
Christian wrote:
Cotty wrote:
I'm a Doctor not a Sturgeon.
There's something fishy going on here
Well it certainly smelts like it.
Better get your ducks in a roe
I don't think you understand the scale of the problem.
True, but haven't you noticed how we follow them
The original document severely limits the Federal Governments powers.
The major problem was the authors left a small loophole to take care of
the unexpected which let the camels nose into the tent...
graywolf wrote:
Actually the Constitution itself does not limit the governments powers, it is
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Gonz wrote:
emacs.
unless i absolutely have to send a doc, then MS word.
If someone *requires* a Word doc, I'll embed a TIF of my LaTeX
document into Word. Word is used as the wrong tool for so many jobs it's
incredible.
-Cory
--
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Adam Maas wrote:
Actually it's just ingrained muscle memory, years of having to use vi
while maintaining services on Unix machines means that the basic editing
commands are pretty much automatic. vi is ideal for that use, it's
lightweight and everything has it.
I still
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Steve Desjardins wrote:
Let's see:
1. Word Processing software
2. Political orientations
3. Sci Fi quotes
4. Some discussion of DSLR design.
5. Some name calling
Yep, typical PDML thread. VBG
DAMN! My email client ordered them wrong so you beat me to it!
Wow. Impressive thread. Let me know if I missed any
controversies:
- WR vs. JCO AND WR+JCO vs PDML.
- Sensor sizes defying physical laws
- Whether Pentax will ever release a FF-DSLR
- Canikon vs. Pentax
- Emacs vs. VI
- Firefox vs. Internet Exploiter
- Policitcal conservatism vs.
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Wow. Impressive thread. Let me know if I missed any
controversies:
- WR vs. JCO AND WR+JCO vs PDML.
- Sensor sizes defying physical laws
- Whether Pentax will ever release a FF-DSLR
- Canikon vs. Pentax
- Emacs vs. VI
- Firefox vs. Internet Exploiter
-
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
Pentax autofocus keeps up quite nicely in CAF mode.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4834217size=lg
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6065859size=lg
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
Oh I don't know. :-) My statement was a little different. I'm saying
that
they have gained a little respect with the K10D and now is the prime time
to
capitalize
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
On Oct 15, 2007, at 11:55 PM, William Robb wrote:
So buy a Canon. They're good for that sort of thing.
I'd rather Pentax built a camera that was up
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
Adam Maas wrote:
Tom C wrote:
It'll likely be a matter of attrition. What % of people here use
WordPerfect as opposed to MS Word?
I use vi
Open Office here
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
So buy a Canon. They're
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
On Oct 15, 2007, at 11:55 PM, William Robb wrote:
So buy a Canon. They're good for that sort of thing.
I'd rather Pentax built a camera
On Oct 16, 2007, at 5:05 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under
NDA) ?
Pentax autofocus keeps up quite nicely in CAF mode.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4834217size=lg
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
Switch to manual focus and do it the right way.
Unfortunately, I'm not as fast as the K10..
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
You brought it up so...
The main part of the Constitution does not and did not intend to limit
government power. It only grants certain specific powers. In the context in
which it was written, government has no power save that which it's given.
All power that the government wields and laws
:49 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 16, 2007, at 5:05 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under
NDA) ?
Pentax autofocus keeps up quite nicely in CAF mode.
http://photo.net/photodb
You're being a piker, we still haven't covered religion and guns!
Though I think the K1 should have an aperture simulator..(But I don't
have to wish for that the K1 or MZ-D or MR-52, or whatever, already had
one).
David Savage wrote:
At 02:22 AM 17/10/2007, Steve Desjardins wrote:
Let's
At 02:22 AM 17/10/2007, Steve Desjardins wrote:
Let's see:
1. Word Processing software
2. Political orientations
3. Sci Fi quotes
4. Some discussion of DSLR design.
5. Some name calling
Yep, typical PDML thread. VBG
Hmmm, but I feel we are still missing something.
...Ah yes!...
Who would
I'm reading this sub-thread and it's all whistling over my head. (I know
about LISP, as Autocad uses it, but the rest is gobbledygook :-) .
You guy's are such computer geek's vbg
For the record, if I need to write a letter, report etc it can't be hand
written, I used MS Word/Excel at work
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA)?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:22:15 -0400
You're being a piker, we still haven't covered religion and guns!
Though I
Don't forget evolution vs. creation, broadly falls under religion though I
guess.
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA
At 10:22 AM 17/10/2007, P. J. Alling wrote:
You're being a piker, we still haven't covered religion and guns!
Religion was last week.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
And make it the size of a Rollei 35S and cost $100, of course.
Godfrey
On Oct 16, 2007, at 7:35 PM, Tom C wrote:
I want a digital 6x7III with interchangeable backs so I can keep
increasing the MP as noise goes down, oh yes, and it should be able
to take a newly developed film back also,
At 10:53 AM 17/10/2007, P. J. Alling wrote:
How the heck did I miss that?
Just lucky I guess.
Cheers,
Dave
David Savage wrote:
At 10:22 AM 17/10/2007, P. J. Alling wrote:
You're being a piker, we still haven't covered religion and guns!
Religion was last week.
Cheers,
How the heck did I miss that?
David Savage wrote:
At 10:22 AM 17/10/2007, P. J. Alling wrote:
You're being a piker, we still haven't covered religion and guns!
Religion was last week.
Cheers,
Dave
--
Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Adam Maas wrote:
Less accurate than the Pentax's, but
they get there a fair bit faster.
Getting to the wrong place quickly rarely helps anyone.
:-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
Adam Maas wrote:
Less accurate than the Pentax's, but
they get there a fair bit faster.
Getting to the wrong place quickly rarely helps anyone.
Not getting
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
The only thing we really lack is a Prime Directive... Leave other
species
alone until they join the present century by themselves.
They'd ignore it anyway.
William
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Doug Franklin
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
Getting to the wrong place quickly rarely helps anyone.
Not getting there at all [or] slowly is just as unhelpful.
No argument from me, in most
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
High ISO noise performance is an area where most of the market has
improved while adding MP. Since there are hard, physical, limits on how
much light will hit a sensor
comments on the list then try to savage those who
respond. To think I actually sort of liked you, I need to get my head
examined. You and JCO should get a Condo together.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even
:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
High ISO noise performance is an area where most of the market has
improved while adding MP. Since there are hard, physical, limits on how
much light will hit a sensor site
The active photosite area in the K10D sensor is around 20-30% of the
chip area. There's a long ways to go before we get anywhere near a
100% efficient collector surface...
G
On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:55 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
The critical question I have for this sensor arguement is what
:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
High ISO noise performance is an area where most of the market has
improved while adding MP. Since there are hard, physical, limits on how
much light
to savage those who
respond. To think I actually sort of liked you, I need to get my head
examined. You and JCO should get a Condo together.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
High ISO
. To think I actually sort of liked you, I need to get my head
examined. You and JCO should get a Condo together.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
High ISO noise performance
get a Condo together.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
High ISO noise performance is an area where most of the market has
improved while adding MP. Since there are hard, physical
should get a Condo together.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA) ?
High ISO noise performance is an area where most of the market has
improved while adding MP. Since
then try to savage those who
respond. To think I actually sort of liked you, I need to get my head
examined. You and JCO should get a Condo together.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Next move from Pentax: anyone in the know (even under NDA
That's 2.3 stops to 100%.
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The active photosite area in the K10D sensor is around 20-30% of the
chip area. There's a long ways to go before we get anywhere near a
100% efficient collector surface...
G
On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:55 AM, Bob
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought that the photosites were not color sensitive, i.e. they are
BW with a Bayer filter pattern in front, so they all would light up
equally with temp, no?
Yes, and there is some noise all over; however, the sensor is receiving
photons through the front of
101 - 200 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
