"Marcus Börger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> At 01:35 19.12.2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> >On 18 Dec 2002, Xavier Spriet wrote:
> >
> > > Well it's up to whoever has karma to make that decision.
> > > People can give their opinion obviously but shouldn't expect to
actually
> > > make the decision.
> >
>
At 01:35 19.12.2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On 18 Dec 2002, Xavier Spriet wrote:
> Well it's up to whoever has karma to make that decision.
> People can give their opinion obviously but shouldn't expect to actually
> make the decision.
That's the problem with the current state of PHP develop
+1 on this.. :)
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Just to somewhat limit my agreement with that statement, I'd rephrase it so
> that it's clear that people's opinion does matter. Something along the
> lines of 'Too many people think that they're in a position to decide about
> PHP'.
>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:26:52AM +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Either way, as Sterling pointed out and I pointed out a few days ago, this
> +-N is really nothing but an 'I (strongly) (dis)agree', and it is in no way
> a voting system. That's one of the key reasons I try to avoid using it,
> a
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 01:51:01PM +0100, Marcus Brger wrote:
> >There is nothing funny about that statement. For example, if
> >you are not going to do the work on merging the CLI/CGI code,
> >just saying that you would like to see that happening has
> >little to no effect. Conc
At 14:34 19/12/2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I disagree. For instance, if I helped writing the combined module, and
> someone separated it without thoroughly making sure that everyone is ok
> with this separation, I believe it's upto him to be responsibl
At 13:14 19.12.2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Just to somewhat limit my agreement with that statement, I'd rephrase it so
> that it's clear that people's opinion does matter. Something along the
> lines of 'Too many people think that they're in a position
> I disagree. For instance, if I helped writing the combined module, and
> someone separated it without thoroughly making sure that everyone is ok
> with this separation, I believe it's upto him to be responsible to merge it
> back in.
That surely happens in 0.01% of the cases. My example
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I disagree. For instance, if I helped writing the combined module, and
> someone separated it without thoroughly making sure that everyone is ok
> with this separation, I believe it's upto him to be responsible to merge it
> back in. What you suggest
At 14:14 19/12/2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Just to somewhat limit my agreement with that statement, I'd rephrase it so
> that it's clear that people's opinion does matter. Something along the
> lines of 'Too many people think that they're in a position
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Just to somewhat limit my agreement with that statement, I'd rephrase it so
> that it's clear that people's opinion does matter. Something along the
> lines of 'Too many people think that they're in a position to decide about
> PHP'.
There is nothin
Just to somewhat limit my agreement with that statement, I'd rephrase it so
that it's clear that people's opinion does matter. Something along the
lines of 'Too many people think that they're in a position to decide about
PHP'.
Zeev
At 02:35 19/12/2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On 18 Dec 2002,
That was quite a funny way of putting it (it did make me literally laugh
out loud a bit), but I have to agree :)
Either way, as Sterling pointed out and I pointed out a few days ago, this
+-N is really nothing but an 'I (strongly) (dis)agree', and it is in no way
a voting system. That's one of
On 18 Dec 2002, Xavier Spriet wrote:
> Well it's up to whoever has karma to make that decision.
> People can give their opinion obviously but shouldn't expect to actually
> make the decision.
That's the problem with the current state of PHP development.
Too many people think that their op
Well it's up to whoever has karma to make that decision.
People can give their opinion obviously but shouldn't expect to actually
make the decision.
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 18:43, Sterling Hughes wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Just clarifying: We never agreed that -+[01] meant anything except a short
> way of:
Hey,
Just clarifying: We never agreed that -+[01] meant anything except a short
way of:
-1 = I strongly disagree
-0 = I disagree
0 = neutral
+0 = I agree
+1 = I strongly agree
ie, We don't have a voting system. If someone, let's call him Barney, says
"-1 on this issue," all that means is that
16 matches
Mail list logo
