Hi Marius,
On 20 August 2012 13:20, marius adrian popa wrote:
> I need to make some corrections on the firebird pdo documentation
>
You already have full phpdoc karma.
Hello,
On that page you have an edit link ( top right corner ). That will take you
to the online manual editor when you can provide a patch.
Upon the patch being submitted, someone from the docs team will review and
publish it.
Cheers,
Stelian
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:20 PM, marius adrian popa
I need to make some corrections on the firebird pdo documentation
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.pdo-firebird.php
pdo firebird is not marked experimental anymore in 5.4 branch for example
http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=6619
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 13:51, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 23:11, Hannes Magnusson
> wrote:
>> On Jul 21, 2011 9:12 PM, "Adam Harvey" wrote:
>>> On 21 July 2011 12:07, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 20:14, Adam Harvey wrote:
> On 21 July 2011 07:
Sender：Hannes Magnusson
Date：2011-01-08 04:13:48
>>Receiver：honestqiao
>>CC：PHP Documentation ML
>>Subject：Re: Re: [PHP-DOC] [phpdoc] When will update the list of php manual's
>>languages?
>>
>>
>On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 17:35, Hannes Magnusson
>
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 17:35, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:25, Hannes Magnusson
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:04, honestqiao wrote:
>>> Sender：Hannes Magnusson
>>> Date：2011-01-03 15:49:19
If you are happy with the current status of the translation we can
e
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:25, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:04, honestqiao wrote:
>> Sender：Hannes Magnusson
>> Date：2011-01-03 15:49:19
>>>If you are happy with the current status of the translation we can
>>>enable it on all the mirrors I guess...
>>
>> It is best t
Sender：Hannes Magnusson
Date：2011-01-04 18:25:05
>>Receiver：honestqiao
>>CC：PHP Documentation ML
>>Subject：Re: Re: [PHP-DOC] [phpdoc] When will update the list of php manual's
>>languages?
>>
>>
>On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:04, honestqiao wrote:
>>
2011/1/4 Hannes Magnusson :
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:37, Alexey Shein wrote:
>> 2011/1/3 Hannes Magnusson :
>>> Since the revcheck.php hasn't updated for a long time (no idea why,
>>> maybe replaced by http://edit.php.net?), I'm unsure of the actual
>>> status of the translation.
>>
>> revcheck
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:37, Alexey Shein wrote:
> 2011/1/3 Hannes Magnusson :
>> Since the revcheck.php hasn't updated for a long time (no idea why,
>> maybe replaced by http://edit.php.net?), I'm unsure of the actual
>> status of the translation.
>
> revcheck.php
> (http://svn.php.net/viewvc/p
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:04, honestqiao wrote:
> Sender：Hannes Magnusson
> Date：2011-01-03 15:49:19
>>Receiver：honestqiao
>>CC：PHP Documentation ML
>>Subject：Re: [PHP-DOC] [phpdoc] When will update the list of php manual's
>>languages?
>>
>>
>
2011/1/3 Hannes Magnusson :
> Since the revcheck.php hasn't updated for a long time (no idea why,
> maybe replaced by http://edit.php.net?), I'm unsure of the actual
> status of the translation.
revcheck.php
(http://svn.php.net/viewvc/phpdoc/doc-base/trunk/scripts/revcheck.php)
works just fine, i
Sender：Hannes Magnusson
Date：2011-01-03 15:49:19
>Receiver：honestqiao
>CC：PHP Documentation ML
>Subject：Re: [PHP-DOC] [phpdoc] When will update the list of php manual's
>languages?
>
>
>2011/1/3 honestqiao :
>> Happy New Year everyone.
>>
>>
>
2011/1/3 honestqiao :
> Happy New Year everyone.
>
>
> Since last August, we began the PHP Manual in Simplified Chinese translation
> and updated.
> The current related work, is ongoing!
> We have also established an external team(http://code.google.com/p/phpdoc-zh)
> to support the Simplified Ch
Happy New Year everyone.
Since last August, we began the PHP Manual in Simplified Chinese translation
and updated.
The current related work, is ongoing!
We have also established an external team(http://code.google.com/p/phpdoc-zh)
to support the Simplified Chinese translation of the man
On Sep 7, 2010, at 5:42 PM, honestqiao wrote:
> When I svn update phpdoc, and compile to chm :
>
> ERROR
> (file:///F:/usr/local/php53/tmp/phpdoc/en/reference/cubrid/configure.xml:1
> 92:6)
> &lgt;?php phpinfo(); ?>
> --^
> Entity 'lgt' not defined
>
> It's <
>
> Who can correct it?
When I svn update phpdoc, and compile to chm :
ERROR (file:///F:/usr/local/php53/tmp/phpdoc/en/reference/cubrid/configure.xml:1
92:6)
&lgt;?php phpinfo(); ?>
--^
Entity 'lgt' not defined
It's <
Who can correct it?
2010-09-08
honestqiao
发件人： Philip Olson
发送时间： 2010-09-08 05:03:0
Hello.
Does anyone have any other templates for PHPDoc?
I've found zym's ExtJS PHPDoc template, but this doesn't seem to be
maintained and there are a few bugs (source code not styled, source
code rendered as external windows with broken links, ordered and
unordered lists not rendered with approp
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 09:22, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 22:25, Nick Shaforostoff wrote:
>> Hi. Please give me write access permission to phpdoc-ru.
>>
>> As can be seen from http://news.php.net/php.doc.ru
>> the last activity ofAntony Dovgal (he may be called phpdoc-r
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 22:25, Nick Shaforostoff wrote:
> Hi. Please give me write access permission to phpdoc-ru.
>
> As can be seen from http://news.php.net/php.doc.ru
> the last activity ofAntony Dovgal (he may be called phpdoc-ru maintainer,
> from what I see)
> was Sat Oct 25 17:19:00 20
Hi. Please give me write access permission to phpdoc-ru.
As can be seen from http://news.php.net/php.doc.ru
the last activity ofAntony Dovgal (he may be called phpdoc-ru maintainer,
from what I see)
was Sat Oct 25 17:19:00 2008.
There is 'Control structures' translation awaiting to be commit
On 19 Oct 2008, at 09:54, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 08:49, Hannes Magnusson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 02:48, Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Agreed about versioning... all of it. And as for where to store
them[1],
I'll create version fi
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 08:49, Hannes Magnusson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 02:48, Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Agreed about versioning... all of it. And as for where to store them[1],
>> I'll create version files per extension and you work on having Configur
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 02:48, Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 24 Sep 2008, at 23:42, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:21, Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hola Amigos!
>>>
>>> We have a few different places that tracks TODO items including:
>>>
>
On 24 Sep 2008, at 23:42, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:21, Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hola Amigos!
We have a few different places that tracks TODO items including:
- http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/phpdoc/TODO
- http://wiki.php.net/doc/todo
- various bug rep
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:21, Philip Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hola Amigos!
>
> We have a few different places that tracks TODO items including:
>
> - http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/phpdoc/TODO
> - http://wiki.php.net/doc/todo
> - various bug reports
> - hidden within peoples brains
>
Hola Amigos!
We have a few different places that tracks TODO items including:
- http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/phpdoc/TODO
- http://wiki.php.net/doc/todo
- various bug reports
- hidden within peoples brains
Let's do some cleanup and consolidation here, prioritize, and do.
Please think abou
On Jan 9, 2008 5:33 AM, Sezer Yalcin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I got Turkish branch build working now. All checked in.
> I see there is not much translated so far but there will be soon. Anyone who
> will change something in phpdoc-tr/ please let me know since I will be
> changing things as we
I got Turkish branch build working now. All checked in.
I see there is not much translated so far but there will be soon. Anyone who
will change something in phpdoc-tr/ please let me know since I will be
changing things as well.
I am sending it here here assuming its a list but I don't get an
On Dec 27, 2007 4:30 AM, TAKAGI Masahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Dec 27, 2007 1:39 AM, Hannes Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > First of all, I'd like to apologize for how long phpdoc has been
> > frozen, I got unexpectedly really busy with work the first days
Hi,
On Dec 27, 2007 1:39 AM, Hannes Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> First of all, I'd like to apologize for how long phpdoc has been
> frozen, I got unexpectedly really busy with work the first days and
> then got sick for few days :|
> Anyway. The merge is now over and phpdoc-e
First of all, I'd like to apologize for how long phpdoc has been
frozen, I got unexpectedly really busy with work the first days and
then got sick for few days :|
Anyway. The merge is now over and phpdoc-en now validates again;
phpdoc is therefore officially unfrozen as of now \o/
Awesome, guys.
Hi all!
First of all, I'd like to apologize for how long phpdoc has been
frozen, I got unexpectedly really busy with work the first days and
then got sick for few days :|
Anyway. The merge is now over and phpdoc-en now validates again;
phpdoc is therefore officially unfrozen as of now \o/
The `ma
This patch adds a --partial option to configure.php in REF_STRUCT_DEV,
allowing for quicker builds over on the PhD side.
The massive amounts of entities that .manual.xml.in defines still bloat
up the file, and I'm not exactly certain whether or not how partials for
refentry would be done.
--
Edw
You could send a file, or two, to the list and have people check it
out for you...
Thanks, the docs I'm talking about are in
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/intl/doc/intl/
I don't have the time to check it out at the moment, hopefully someone
else will :]
Looks pretty good so far, but a
On 8/17/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This magic include has nothing to do with IDs or refnames or any other
> > element/attribute. Its a total file based voodoo.
>
> Yes, I understand. What I wasn't sure is if I have two refname's in
> refentry tag, would I still get one en
This magic include has nothing to do with IDs or refnames or any other
element/attribute. Its a total file based voodoo.
Yes, I understand. What I wasn't sure is if I have two refname's in
refentry tag, would I still get one entry on the reference page when
it's rendered? I guess the answer is
On 8/17/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Neither. functions.xml is autogenerated by configure and referes to
> > the filepath.
>
> So, the function list in main extension page gets one entry per file in
> functions/? Where the names come from - is it refname? What if I have
> m
Neither. functions.xml is autogenerated by configure and referes to
the filepath.
So, the function list in main extension page gets one entry per file in
functions/? Where the names come from - is it refname? What if I have
more than one refname - is it only first?
2. There's two ways of ma
On 8/16/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another couple of questions:
> 1. What does &reference.module.functions; (functions.xml) collect -
> xml:id or refname?
Neither. functions.xml is autogenerated by configure and referes to
the filepath.
> 2. There's two ways of making ex
Another couple of questions:
1. What does &reference.module.functions; (functions.xml) collect -
xml:id or refname?
2. There's two ways of making external links and xlink:href>. Is there a difference? Which one should be used?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] h
On 8/16/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> What if OO and procedural have different names, like Format->getError
> >> and format_get_error?
> >
> > Life sucks :)
> > Depending on the xml:id you can only create a link the OO way or the
> > procedural way.
>
> I see. So then I can
What if OO and procedural have different names, like Format->getError
and format_get_error?
Life sucks :)
Depending on the xml:id you can only create a link the OO way or the
procedural way.
I see. So then I can't use for the second way - I should use
then or ?
Thanks for your help,
--
St
On 8/16/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you wrap it inside a element then drop the (),
> > otherwise I'd say keep them
>
> When does function tag create link and when it doesn't? I saw sometimes
I recently posted a note on the subject, see
http://news.php.net/php.doc/9693
If you wrap it inside a element then drop the (),
otherwise I'd say keep them
When does function tag create link and when it doesn't? I saw sometimes
it does, but I'm pretty sure I saw cases when it doesn't. Generally, if
I want to link to a function, should I use , or ?
I see most docs use
On 8/16/07, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What are the standards/conventions on the following matters:
>
> 1. Method names in reference.xml (when descripting class) - should I use
>class->method or class->method() (with or without braces)? I see both
> - compare PDO and DOM do
What are the standards/conventions on the following matters:
1. Method names in reference.xml (when descripting class) - should I use
class->method or class->method() (with or without braces)? I see both
- compare PDO and DOM docs.
2. Function names in function description (refname) - with or
> Somebody has deleted all templates in xsl/ and no history left. When I
> was writing my previous letter they were there. That bloody CVS is no
> more useful than plain FTP if I constantly need to use mail list and
> archives to get the idea of "what the heck is going on"? FTP at least
> works thr
Hi,
At Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:56:11 -0400,
Sean Coates wrote:
>
> FYI, I just did:
> bash-2.05b# rm -r /local/repository/phpdoc/ja /local/repository/phpdoc/kr
>
> on y1, at Nuno/Philip's request -- these old directories were
> conflicting with the phpdoc-ja, phpdoc-kr modules.
>
Thank you.
I close
FYI, I just did:
bash-2.05b# rm -r /local/repository/phpdoc/ja /local/repository/phpdoc/kr
on y1, at Nuno/Philip's request -- these old directories were
conflicting with the phpdoc-ja, phpdoc-kr modules.
S
||*()*|| Hi, Gabor.
>> Can anybody explain me the meaning of string
>>
>> .manual.xml: $(DEPEND_FILES) entities/global.ent
>>
>> in phpdoc/Makefile, located in the following section.
>> I'm unable to find where does $(DEPEND_FILES) come from
>> and what is it used for?
GH> Please search the CVS
Can anybody explain me the meaning of string
.manual.xml: $(DEPEND_FILES) entities/global.ent
in phpdoc/Makefile, located in the following section.
I'm unable to find where does $(DEPEND_FILES) come from
and what is it used for?
-[cut]-[Makefile]---
...
manual.xm
Hello, phpdoc@lists.php.net
Can anybody explain me the meaning of string
.manual.xml: $(DEPEND_FILES) entities/global.ent
in phpdoc/Makefile, located in the following section.
I'm unable to find where does $(DEPEND_FILES) come from
and what is it used for?
-[cut]
Title: Untitled Document
Title: 安全性行為
Title: 安全性行為
Title: 安全性行為
Yes, all this seems to be acomplised :)
Goba
techtonik írta:
Hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can this RFC be considered done and be deleted?
--[cut installpart]--
Sun Jan 26 2003
[TARGET]
Installpart in Chapters en/chapters/install.xxx.xml files
[Situation]
The current stru
Hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can this RFC be considered done and be deleted?
--[cut installpart]--
Sun Jan 26 2003
[TARGET]
Installpart in Chapters en/chapters/install.xxx.xml files
[Situation]
The current structure is very bad.
We need more deep sections (not sect
Okay, sounds good.
Let me know what you'd like me to do.
Thanks,
Aidan
So on the migration pages we have
"Friedhelm Betz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi Aidan,
>
> [...]
> >
> > I think a possible solution would be to add a Tip or Note saying "See
> > here for m
Hi Aidan,
[...]
>
> I think a possible solution would be to add a Tip or Note saying "See
> here for more information about using this function without upgrading
> your version of PHP".
This would be a possible solution and a better one, as adding many
notes;-)
> That page could then point to e
I disagree, 90% of the notes for PHP5 functions discuss replica PHP4
versions. I think it's clear people don't check the migration pages before
reading or making their own post (why would they!).
I think a possible solution would be to add a Tip or Note saying "See here
for more information about
> Hi,
> I noticed that you placed many notes in the notes system announcing the
> mentioned pear package PHP_Compat.
> It would be much smarter to integrate this in the regular docs, rather
> than posting this to the user notes.
> Thoughts?
I agree. And as useful as it may be or seem it doesn'
Hi,
I noticed that you placed many notes in the notes system announcing the
mentioned pear package PHP_Compat.
It would be much smarter to integrate this in the regular docs, rather
than posting this to the user notes.
Thoughts?
regards
Friedhelm
--
http://www.hostsharing.net
Hi all !
Since #php.doc on EFNet is pretty dead, a few PHP Documentation Members
decided to create a new channel, #phpdoc on Freenode (irc.freenode.net).
There are some goals behind this (re)birth :
- Coordinate efforts :
You may have followed the commits lately, there was an effort made on
t
Hi!
Can I have write access to /phpdoc module in CVS?
I have some translated files to add to /phpdoc/ru/ and I'm planning to continue
translating it in the future.
Should I send them to some person with enough carma?
Currently I have access only to /peardoc, but I suppose it will be more suitabl
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:01:20 +0200
Gabor Hojtsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You actually need to write access to phpdoc-ru and definitely *not*
> phpdoc.
Errr...ok, I was wrong =)
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] can give you more Karma.
thanx!
---
WBR,
Antony Dovgal aka tony2001
[EMA
Can I have write access to /phpdoc module in CVS?
I have some translated files to add to /phpdoc/ru/ and I'm planning to continue
translating it in the future.
Should I send them to some person with enough carma?
Currently I have access only to /peardoc, but I suppose it will be more suitable for
Hi!
I have started to write up an agenda for the meeting, which will
probably be much more extensive then last year's agenda was. I would
like to provide a brief explanation on all the issues planned for
discussion, so people won't be there without knowing what we are talking
about (as that ha
> And the solution for global build system is?
> Or build system is working now?
http://php.net/download-docs is back up with the old files, and
the files will be replaced with new ones as the manuals build
AFAIK...
Goba
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe,
oh, hey, now i haven't replied yet! :)
>
> > not having seen any replies to this, i'm slightly annoyed, but
> i'll assume
> > people didn't see my point / questions in the email.
> >
> > so, i'll make it to the point:
> >
> > do we need to run test_man_gen through the process, and if so, why is it
And the solution for global build system is?
Or build system is working now?
André Æ
- Original Message -
From: "Gabor Hojtsy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "André LFS Bacci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002
> Forward
>
> > http://www.php.net/download-docs.php
> >
> > Only half of the translations?
Once again, it is just the right time to practice the golden
rule from the howto: "do a make test". If the translators
do a make test, they will see their translation's problems.
There is nothing magical e
Forward
> http://www.php.net/download-docs.php
>
> Only half of the translations?
>
> []s
>
> André Æ
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "James Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "phpdoc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Satur
> so,
>
> not having seen any replies to this, i'm slightly annoyed, but i'll assume
> people didn't see my point / questions in the email.
>
> so, i'll make it to the point:
>
> do we need to run test_man_gen through the process, and if so, why is it
> that half the translations aren't building?
> BTW do you have any answer to our question regarding the build problems
> on PHP.net? See http://php.net/blog/hu for example (it is some core
> problem).
Just a small correction jic, it's for example:
http://www.php.net/hu/blog
--
PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To un
> not having seen any replies to this, i'm slightly annoyed, but i'll assume
> people didn't see my point / questions in the email.
>
> so, i'll make it to the point:
>
> do we need to run test_man_gen through the process, and if so, why is it
> that half the translations aren't building?
Yep, t
27;t building?
-- james
> -Original Message-
> From: James Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 1:23 AM
> To: phpdoc
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP-DOC] phpdoc building woes
>
>
> Guys,
>
> So the reason that rsync isn'
riday, November 15, 2002 8:32 AM
Subject: [PHP-DOC] phpdoc-pt_BR-dir
> What you said is wrong.
> phpdoc-pt_BR with -dir doesn´t have the howto, the original english
> files, the ./configure and all other files need to make the manual, none
> tool to make the revcheck.
> It have only th
What you said is wrong.
phpdoc-pt_BR with -dir doesn´t have the howto, the original english
files, the ./configure and all other files need to make the manual, none
tool to make the revcheck.
It have only the translated files, but with it you have to use cvs to
download the en files and every an
Guys,
So the reason that rsync isn't back on yet is that phpweb is _STILL_
building. That's like longer than 24 hours!!
:/local/mirrors/phpweb/manual/ar:$ zcat build.log.gz |head -n 1
>>> starting build at: Wed Nov 13 08:29:35 PST 2002
:/local/mirrors/phpweb/manual/ar:$ date
Thu Nov 14 17:04:47 P
Hi!
The PHP Documentation license change is in the air for a long time,
but actual movement was not made to change the license, we've just
talked about it... I would like to ask every guy adressed personnaly
(all the officialy listed manual authors) to reply to this letter
and express their opini
Hi!
Well, I spent some time with investigating what structures can we use to
achive the groupings we already discussed. The most important priority
was that no change should be required to any other file but manual.xml.in,
or a very small number of changes should be required.
So we needed a stru
> > Didn't most agree to make the manual available in
> > .tar.gz and perhaps .bz2 also?
> On Tue, 14 May 2002, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> AFAIK we agreed on providing both .tar.gz and .bz2
> but no more [no .zip].
Sounds good, I'm looking forward to this :)
Regards,
Philip Olson
Hello,
Didn't most agree to make the manual available in
.tar.gz and perhaps .bz2 also?
Regards,
Philip Olson
> Hi. I may be sending this email to the wrong address, in which case you
> could you please tell me who I ought to contact?
>
> I've noticed about three open source projects in existance all named
phpdoc,
> and all seemingly out of date. What they all aim to do is make a PHP
> equivalent of the
Hi. I may be sending this email to the wrong address, in which case you
could you please tell me who I ought to contact?
I've noticed about three open source projects in existance all named phpdoc,
and all seemingly out of date. What they all aim to do is make a PHP
equivalent of the javadoc pr
Mark Kronsbein wrote:
>
> Seems like Hartmut's path fort Makefile.in does not really work.
As Hartmut told me on IRC, i did a "make" instead of "make test" first.
This made a file called missing-entities.ent, but its empty.
So "make test" gives errors again ;(
Mark
--
German Gabber Network
Seems like Hartmut's path fort Makefile.in does not really work.
The following is whyt I get in cygwin.
Mark@LAURA e:/cvs/phpdoc
$ autoconf
Mark@LAURA e:/cvs/phpdoc
$ ./configure --with-lang=de
file versions
Makefile.in,v 1.108
configure.in,v 1.123
configure options: --with-lang=de
checking fo
From: "Gabor Hojtsy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I prepared a tutorial for a student course, the introduction is
taken from
> various
> > sources from the net, the language reference (part II) is copied
from the
> phpdoc.
> > Part III and IV is of my own.
>
> We will be happy to see part one, three a
> > You must add the original authors names. Do not treat my reply as
> > official please! Wait for others replys!
>
> Like: PartII is originaly written by ...
> But there are minor changes(fixes) in the PartII, how to treat them?
Ideally you can add them to the phpdoc CVS :)
Goba
Quoting Gabor Hojtsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I prepared a tutorial for a student course, the introduction is taken
> from
> various
> > sources from the net, the language reference (part II) is copied from
> the
> phpdoc.
> > Part III and IV is of my own.
>
> We will be happy to see part one, t
> I prepared a tutorial for a student course, the introduction is taken from
various
> sources from the net, the language reference (part II) is copied from the
phpdoc.
> Part III and IV is of my own.
We will be happy to see part one, three and four of your work. I myself
do not know German, thou
Hello,
I prepared a tutorial for a student course, the introduction is taken from various
sources from the net, the language reference (part II) is copied from the phpdoc.
Part III and IV is of my own.
I copy and paste it from the german html version and made a latex version for
proper printing.
Hey, the cvs commits are now going to php-cvs!
I.M.O. it's best to send them to phpdoc (as far as the documentation is
concerned, of course). Is it possible to get it back?
Greetz,
Jeroen
Title:
¢Ä ¿À´ÃÀÇ À¯¸Ó ¢Å
¡á°ú½Ã¿åA girl got an
engagement ring, and would seize every opportunity for calling attention to
it. In a group with girl friends no one noticed it. Finally when
herfriends were sitting around talking, she got up suddenly and said,
"It's awfully hot in he
> manual writers need the infrastructure + english original files, theese
> will both stay in the original repository
>
> but the usual manual writer will only need this and none of the
> translations (which right now make up about 75% of the manual
> sources. with all translations done it would
Hi Egon,
Hartmut has said some things in his last post I'd also say, so I just respond to the
"rest":)
> Dont take my answer personal, could you break your lines with your emailer
> down to a readable size?
No prob, have done it here to 80 chars. OK? (hope I don't forget it on the other PCs
:)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I understand Hartmut very well, but I also understand several points of the
> > others.
>
> I know him very well. [...]
to know someone and to understand someone can be
two very different things by times :)
> > 1.) We should have in mind the average user - also
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:55:45PM +0200, Thomas wrote:
> I understand Hartmut very well, but I also understand several points of the
> others.
I know him very well. I have been working with him together over a year.
> I think we all here have at least similar aims (if not the same) concerning
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
