Eric Cunningham a écrit :
Thanks Victor. Ok, so I:
- removed .$mydomain from $mydestination
- have set relay_domains = $mydestination, $mynetworks
do not do that. mydestination is for domains that should be delivered
locally. mynetworks have nothing to do with reception domains.
Jonathan McMahon wrote:
I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
My general feedback:
1. I find Postfix to be somewhat difficult, and the google search documentation for my specific setup is fragmented and incomplete at best. I did expect this given the number of possible
Hi.
I want the email server backup the sending out email.
For example.The user send a email out to other user,the smtp server copy it and
send it to a backup server when it sending the email out.
So the administrator or the user can saw the email which he/she sent out.
Can the postfix do it
I believe you need to move your users to the alternate submission port. The
normal widely used port for this is 587. Some people will lock down port
587 to only allow authenticated and encrypted connections. Others will
allow non crypto, but mandate authentication.
Thanks for the
Jeff Huang wrote:
Hi.
I want the email server backup the sending out email.
For example.The user send a email out to other user,the smtp server
copy it and send it to a backup server when it sending the email out.
So the administrator or the user can saw the email which he/she sent out.
Hi
I'm a newbie to Postfix.
My Postfix server is functionnal but the stats (mailgraph) show lot of sent
messages :
example for yesterday :
Received messages : 2818
Sent messages : 2766
I don't think that the users of the mail server sent so many mails
yesterday...
I suppose that I've a
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Jonathan McMahon jongmcma...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
My general feedback:
1. I find Postfix to be somewhat difficult, and the google search
documentation for my specific setup is fragmented and incomplete at
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 03:18 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
SNIP
As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from time
to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is that the
new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well be the poster's own
fault for not
Zitat von Rik hlug090...@buzzhost.co.uk:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 03:18 -0400, Aaron Wolfe wrote:
SNIP
As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from time
to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is that the
new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well be
Thanks it worked :)
Guillaume HILT a écrit :
Hi,
I'm using mailman 2.1.11 on gentoo AMD64.
It's running with postfix, dspam and virtual domains/users (managed by
postfixadmin).
My problem is that all emails sent to a mailing list fall in the catchall.
I'm using a specifig subdomain for the
Hello !
I'm currently migrating my mail server from an old Fedora to an Ubuntu LTS.
My configuration :
Server01 (old Fedora) :
POP3/IMAP/SMTP ports open to Internet
Postfix Server with SASL authentification against local PAM db
Dovecot Server with local mailboxes
Server02 (Ubunti LTS) :
Hi,
I am using Postfix 2.5.5.
I would like to test recipients against a ldap query.
I have 2 mailAlternateAddress attributes for the ldap entry wich mail
attribute is post...@spam3.gm.transpac.fr:
# postmap -q post...@spam3.gm.transpac.fr
ldap:/etc/postfix/ldapUserAccessTest.cf
OK,OK
Having
In my setup, I have a hash table that's used in relay_domains, like so:
relay_domains =
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/domains,
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/auto/domains
Currently, this table is completely rebuilt from a database every five
minutes or so, even if there are
On May 6, 2009, at 12:10 AM, Philippe Le Gal wrote:
I'm a newbie to Postfix.
My Postfix server is functionnal but the stats (mailgraph) show lot
of sent
messages :
example for yesterday :
Received messages : 2818
Sent messages : 2766
I don't think that the users of the mail server sent so
On 5/6/2009, Gaël Lams (lamsg...@gmail.com) wrote:
I modified master.cf and configure submission that way:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
On 5/6/2009, Rik (hlug090...@buzzhost.co.uk) wrote:
As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from
time to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is
that the new user ends up feeling insulted. This may well be the
poster's own fault for not respecting how this
Thank,
It seems that Mailgraph count local delivery via procmail as sent message.
I'll check Mailgraph config.
I think that was the problem.
Philippe
Le Wednesday 06 May 2009 12:31:55 Scott Haneda, vous avez écrit :
On May 6, 2009, at 12:10 AM, Philippe Le Gal wrote:
I'm a newbie to
Charles Marcus wrote, at 05/06/2009 06:38 AM:
On 5/6/2009, Gaël Lams (lamsg...@gmail.com) wrote:
I modified master.cf and configure submission that way:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
These are being generated by Amavis in response to spam email being sent to a
client's network, using their own email addresses as the 'sender'.
How can I stop Amavis from generating these messages?
Michael
On 5/6/2009 8:37 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
I modified master.cf and configure submission that way:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
Charles Marcus wrote, at 05/06/2009 08:48 AM:
On 5/6/2009 8:37 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
I modified master.cf and configure submission that way:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
-o
On 5/6/2009 9:03 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
I believe newer versions (I'm on 2.5.6) should be something like:
submission inet n - n - - smtpd
-o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_tls_auth_only=yes
-o
Charles Marcus wrote, at 05/06/2009 09:38 AM:
On 5/6/2009 9:03 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
Another minor advantage is that the configuration will continue to work
if permit_sasl_authenticated is removed from
smtpd_recipient_restrictions in main.cf (if the decision is ever made to
disallow
I have multiple almost identically configured postfix servers relaying
mails
On one of the servers the mails get stuck in incoming queue. All other
servers are delivering perfectly fine
There are no body / header checks on this machine that could
potentially be slowing down pickup. And
Michael wrote:
These are being generated by Amavis in response to spam email being sent to a
client's network, using their own email addresses as the 'sender'.
How can I stop Amavis from generating these messages?
Michael
Sounds as if you've enabled the warnspamsender (or maybe the
Ulrich Zehl wrote:
In my setup, I have a hash table that's used in relay_domains, like so:
relay_domains =
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/domains,
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/auto/domains
Currently, this table is completely rebuilt from a database every five
minutes or
Thanks mouss. I removed $mynetworks from relay_domains and added the
domains found in the transport map to relay_domains (while also keeping
them in the transport map). Relaying to those specific domains now works.
However, MX'd machines still suffer relay access denied. I introduced
Thanks Barney, thanks Noel,
All works fine.
Bye,
rocsva
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Barney Desmond
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 12:38 AM
To: postfix users list
Subject: Re: Redirect messages for
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:54:42AM +0200, postfix wrote:
Hi,
I am using Postfix 2.5.5.
I would like to test recipients against a ldap query.
I have 2 mailAlternateAddress attributes for the ldap entry wich mail
attribute is post...@spam3.gm.transpac.fr:
# postmap -q
Hi,
I'm using postfix 2.5.6 + dovecot + amavis with virtual domains.
The system work fine and users can send and read emails (tnx for the great
documentation).
Now I need to do:
1) prepend [INFO] to the subject of all incomming email that have
header To equal to i...@domain.tld
2) add Bcc:
Alberto Scarpa wrote:
Hi,
I'm using postfix 2.5.6 + dovecot + amavis with virtual domains.
The system work fine and users can send and read emails (tnx for the great
documentation).
Now I need to do:
1) prepend [INFO] to the subject of all incomming email that have
header To equal to
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 20:53 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Postfix 2.6 will pass the TLS is active flag. I have changed the
API so that we no longer need to make code changes in every SASL
plugin when another attribute is added.
It works with smtps but doesn't work with STARTTLS, because
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 06:52 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/6/2009, Rik (hlug090...@buzzhost.co.uk) wrote:
As it stands, this list gets poorly posed or lazy questions from
time to time, usually from new users. The trend in these cases is
that the new user ends up feeling insulted. This
Alberto Scarpa wrote:
Hi,
I'm using postfix 2.5.6 + dovecot + amavis with virtual domains.
The system work fine and users can send and read emails (tnx for the great
documentation).
Now I need to do:
1) prepend [INFO] to the subject of all incomming email that have
header To equal to
On Wed May 6 2009 00:44:28 Jonathan McMahon wrote:
I'm 100% completely new to Postfix, somewhat new to *nix.
The former is not a problem; Postfix documentation has you covered.
Where you will find (have been finding) difficulty is in the latter.
Postfix documentation does not (and IMO mostly
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:02:35PM +0200, Ulrich Zehl wrote:
In my setup, I have a hash table that's used in relay_domains, like so:
relay_domains =
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/domains,
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/auto/domains
Currently, this table is completely
On Wed May 6 2009 05:02:35 Ulrich Zehl wrote:
In my setup, I have a hash table that's used in relay_domains, like
so:
relay_domains =
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/domains,
hash:/etc/postfix-incoming/maps/auto/domains
Currently, this table is completely rebuilt from a
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:47:37PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
The way it works here is that any fool
like me can answer a newbie's question, and if we get it wrong, we are
corrected by the ones who really know.
Let's end the thread here. :-) Hopefully the OP is trying to make sense of
the
I have multiple almost identically configured postfix servers relaying
mails
On one of the servers the mails get stuck in incoming queue. All other
servers are delivering perfectly fine
There are no body / header checks on this machine that could
potentially be slowing down pickup. And
I have multiple almost identically configured postfix servers relaying
mails
On one of the servers the mails get stuck in incoming queue. All other
servers are delivering perfectly fine
There are no body / header checks on this machine that could
potentially be slowing down pickup. And
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:01:25PM +0530, ram wrote:
I have multiple almost identically configured postfix servers relaying
mails
On one of the servers the mails get stuck in incoming queue. All other
servers are delivering perfectly fine
There are no body / header checks on this
Hi,
I am configuring Virtual domains and mailboxes on CentOS 5.5 using
MySQL for data maps and SASL for SMTP Auth. As far as I can say, I have
followed The Book of Postfix.
Dovecot and Postfix both use the same tables for authentication and
POP authentication works perfectly. However
Hi everyone,
Ok, I have a question...
First, I've never claimed to be smarter than the average amoeba
(although I think possibly I grill a better steak), and I do seem to
recall some time ago someone (mouss, was that you?) saying that the way
I was blocking senders might have unintended
Eric Cunningham a écrit :
Thanks mouss. I removed $mynetworks from relay_domains and added the
domains found in the transport map to relay_domains (while also keeping
them in the transport map). Relaying to those specific domains now works.
However, MX'd machines still suffer relay access
--On Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:40 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Postfix 2.6 stable release candidate 3 is available. If this has
no problems, then Postfix 2.6.0 will happen soon. The same code is
also available as Postfix 2.7 experimental release 20090428.
Although the
On 6-May-2009, at 01:29, Rik wrote:
I could not agree more. To the point this is the very *LAST* place I
go
for help.
This should be the last place you go for help. You read the docs, you
google, you research, try and find the answer, and THEN you post here.
I can't tell you how often
On Thu, 07 May 2009, Jeff Huang wrote:
Another way,I want the mail server to deliver all the receiveing mails to
two mailBox server(maybe tow pop server).
I found the transport_maps can set the relay host that next hop.
I set it as:
domain1.com
On Wed, 06 May 2009, Charles Marcus wrote:
I sent him a farewell 'frak off' email directly (yeah, I know, childish
of me), then smtp rejected anything from his address (using a
'check_sender_access' hash with his email address in it (simple reject
applied, otherwise nothing offensive):
Sorry - this was my mistake. The server's arch was 64 and the sasl
expected smtpd.conf in /usr/lib64/sasl2/, not in /usr/lib/sasl2/. Once
I symlinked the two, SASL authenticated correctly.
Thank you for the attention,
Regards
Gurunandan
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 01:28 +0530, Gurunandan R. Bhat
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 14:23 -0400, Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:01:25PM +0530, ram wrote:
I have multiple almost identically configured postfix servers relaying
mails
On one of the servers the mails get stuck in incoming queue. All other
servers are delivering
50 matches
Mail list logo
