On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Jeff Weinberger
j...@jeffweinberger.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 1/28/2010 5:36 PM, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 1/28/2010 4:46
I am using mysql (quite successfully in most cases) to do lookups for
a variety of reasons in postfix.
Recently, I had some issues with a domain lookup and in the testing
tried varying my MySQL query between using %d and %s as the lookup
key.
The documentation is clear on this when the query is
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Jeff Weinberger:
I am using mysql (quite successfully in most cases) to do lookups for
a variety of reasons in postfix.
Recently, I had some issues with a domain lookup and in the testing
tried varying my MySQL query
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Wietse Venema wie...@... wrote:
Jeff Weinberger:
I changed main.cf so the only relay_domains entry is:
relay_domains=lists.mylistserver.com
You need to verify this with the command
postconf -n
It's no good posting unverified cut-and-paste
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Jeff Weinberger:
Jeff Weinberger:
I changed main.cf so the only relay_domains entry is:
relay_domains=lists.mylistserver.com
You need to verify this with the command
postconf -n
It's no good posting
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
Jeff Weinberger put forth on 1/28/2010 4:18 PM:
You've made it clear I'm posting the wrong thing - but I don't know
what the right thing is
Sorry to but in Wietse.
Jeff, paste all of postconf -n output
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 1/28/2010 4:46 PM, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
virtual_alias_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_virtual_alias_domains.cf
does lists.mylistserver.com match the above lookup?
postmap -q lists.mylistserver.com mysql
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 1/28/2010 5:36 PM, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Noel Jonesnjo...@megan.vbhcs.org
wrote:
On 1/28/2010 4:46 PM, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
virtual_alias_domains =
mysql:/etc/postfix
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Wietse Venema wie...@... wrote:
Jeff Weinberger: Jeff Weinberger:[ Charset UTF-8
unsupported, converting... ] --- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com,
mouss mouss@ wrote: Jeff Weinberger a ?crit :
I am hoping that this is something
I am hoping that this is something fairly simple that I am missing
I have a few lists on a mailman server that I run. Until recently, only
authenticated users (those who have actual accounts on my IMAP/Virtual
mailboxes server and can authenticate via SASL). Now I want to allow certain
users
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, mouss mo...@... wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a �crit :
I am hoping that this is something fairly simple that I am missing
I have a few lists on a mailman server that I run. Until recently, only
authenticated users (those who have actual accounts on my
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, Wietse Venema wie...@... wrote:
Jeff Weinberger:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
--- In postfix-us...@yahoogroups.com, mouss mouss@ wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a ?crit :
I am hoping that this is something fairly simple that I am
missing
Mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a �crit :
[snip]
This is helpful, but I still need the query to take all the other
alias domains into account. So, I need the IF condition, or a
second map.
I don't think so. I used this. I don't remember the details, but the
idea is that you can often get
.
This is helpful, but I still need the query to take all the other
alias domains into account. So, I need the IF condition, or a second
map.
Thank you for your help...it's informative as always!
if the wildcard alias will produce the result I need then this is
resolved.
--
Jeff Weinberger
http
that is not the To: or Cc: address (such as list mail).
Really, I am just checking with experts more knowledgeable than I
whether I have chosen a good (or the best) way to achieve this, or if
there is a better way.
Any advice and help are much appreciated!
Thanks,
--Jeff
--
Jeff Weinberger
http
Hi:
I am hoping someone can offer help in determining this information
about the specifics of how sendmail submits mail.
I have three different services configured in master.cf to accept
mail: 1) the regular smtpd service on port 25, 2) a submission service
for authenticated clients, and
Viktor Wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:26:23 -0500
From: Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com
Subject: Re: Question on sendmail submission and master.cf -o
overrides
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:11:16PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
I am hoping someone can offer help
Viktor Wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:01:51PM +0100, mouss wrote:
jeff_homeip a ?crit :
[snip]
When I added this back, all worked fine. If I remove this one
restriction
(check_sender_access), I can no longer send.
is this check_sender_access, because it's not rejecting the
This may seem like an odd question, but I need to find a way to
suspend delivery of mail to one account or one domain for a short
period of time to allow me to do a bit of maintenance.
As it stands now, I use maildrop as my delivery transport for virtual
mailboxes.
Is there a way to tell
On Jan 14, 2009, at 3:53 PM, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:
Jeff Weinberger wrote:
This may seem like an odd question, but I need to find a way to
suspend delivery of mail to one account or one domain for a short
period of time to allow me to do a bit of maintenance.
As it stands now, I use
Hi:
This question is just a request for information on this...
I currently use reject_sender_login_mismatch in my
smtpd_sender_restrictions as an added precaution against someone sending
undesirable mail.
I see that I can also use reject_unauthenticated_sender_login_mismatch, but
I don't
Viktor Duchovni wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:25:38PM -0800, Jeff Weinberger wrote:
reject_sender_login_mismatch checks the from address against
smtpd_sender_login_maps to be sure that the MAIL FROM address is
owned
by
the SASL-authenticated sender
On Jan 8, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 12:10 AM:
Hi:
Based on good practice and the help and urging of some of the gurus
on this
list, I am moving my users to using the submission service (port 587)
instead of port 25 to send mail from their mail
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:53:45 -0500, Jorey Bump l...@joreybump.com wrote:
Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 09:27 AM:
Setting smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no would mean that no authentication is
required on port 25, but if I understand it correctly, it wouldn't
actually stop an authenticated
On Jan 8, 2009, at 6:53 AM, Jorey Bump wrote:
Jeff Weinberger wrote, at 01/08/2009 09:27 AM:
Setting smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = no would mean that no
authentication is
required on port 25, but if I understand it correctly, it wouldn't
actually stop an authenticated user from sending mail
Hi:
Based on good practice and the help and urging of some of the gurus on
this
list, I am moving my users to using the submission service (port 587)
instead of port 25 to send mail from their mail clients.
Once most of them move, I'd like to start warning the ones who don't
that
they
Hi:
I would very much appreciate any help, advice, pointers, etc. to
resolve an issue I am encountering.
I am having a challenge trying to use a mysql table for
smtpd_sender_login_maps. Right now I have:
In main.cf:
smtpd_sender_login_maps=mysql:/path/to/map.cf
On Tue Jan 6, 2009 2:42 pm Victor Duchovni wrote:
I know that it is not a good model for the way postfix requires the
query,
More stronly, an SQL schema in which multiple data items are stored
concatenated in a single table element is a poor schema regardless
of the application. This
On Jan 6, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeff Weinberger:
I then added the line:
smtpd_sender_login_maps=hash:/path/to/map
to my main.cf and send a few messages. Postfix correctly allowed and
rejected all of the test messaages, and the logs showed the correct
reason for the rejection
Hi:
Yet another question I hope I can impose upon your help for...
I am testing sender restrictions and have defined an alternate
submission entry in master.cf for this purpose (and not to disrupt
other users while I test).
I want to test the check_sender_access which requires the form
On Jan 2, 2009, at 2:30 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
I used a pcre: table for smtpd_sender_restrictions and the PREPEND
action as follows:
main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
pcre:/etc/postfix/smtpd_sender_restrictions.pcre
On Jan 2, 2009, at 9:20 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
It's definitely my set up. I don't use LMTP to pass the message to
dspam, I use a transport called dspam that uses pipe. That means
there's no S/LMTP dialog, just the message itself passed as STDIN.
so _you_ are not passing
Wietse Venema wrote:
Jeff Weinberger:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On Jan 2, 2009, at 2:30 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a ?crit :
I used a pcre: table for smtpd_sender_restrictions and the
PREPEND
action as follows:
main.cf:
smtpd_sender_restrictions
On Jan 2, 2009, at 2:17 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
On Jan 2, 2009, at 9:20 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
It's definitely my set up. I don't use LMTP to pass the message to
dspam, I use a transport called dspam that uses pipe. That means
there's no S/LMTP dialog
On Jan 2, 2009, at 3:20 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
content_filter=lmtp:unix:/path/to/dspam args
No.
content_filter=lmtp:inet:127.0.0.1:10024
where the 10024 is the same port used in dspam.conf:
ServerPort10024
of course, dspam must be running in daemon mode
On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:53 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
[snip]
- try with hosts = 127.0.0.1 (without localhost)
Tried this - no change. :(
ahem. if you do this, you should not hear about a socket. it should
use
a TCP connection. can you show the errors?
OK, now I've taken
On Jan 2, 2009, at 4:03 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
OK, thanks. I will set up dspam to listen on port 10024 - seems to
make
the most sense. I don't need a localhost:10024 entry in master.cf
then?
right?
no, 10024 will be used by dspam. your postfix should have
mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
I've verified that the R flag is there and I use -f ${sender} on
the
command line (the script does parse the arguments)
I think the envelope-sender is missing before it enters the content
filter. This from my mail.log:
Dec 31 19:50:07 s postfix
On Jan 1, 2009, at 9:31 AM, mouss wrote:
jeff_homeip a écrit :
--- In post...@yahoogroups.com, mouss mo...@... wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
I've verified that the R flag is there and I use -f ${sender}
on the
command line (the script does parse the arguments)
I think the envelope
On Jan 1, 2009, at 9:49 AM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
Thank you! That helps clarify what I was missing in this - so clearly
dspam is not passing the envelope sender back to postfix.
I suspect it doesn't know how via SMTP, but it can also use the
sendmail command to do this. I
Hello again:
One more issue on which I would appreciate any help anyone can offer:
Yesterday I upgraded my postfix installation from 2.5.2 to 2.5.5 and
my MySQL installation from 5.0.51b to 5.0.75. Immediately after
restarting everything (the whole computer), I started seeing these
On Jan 1, 2009, at 1:55 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
Hello again:
One more issue on which I would appreciate any help anyone can offer:
Yesterday I upgraded my postfix installation from 2.5.2 to 2.5.5
and my
MySQL installation from 5.0.51b to 5.0.75. Immediately after
On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:53 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
[snip]
- try with hosts = 127.0.0.1 (without localhost)
Tried this - no change. :(
ahem. if you do this, you should not hear about a socket. it should
use
a TCP connection. can you show the errors?
I would think so
On Jan 1, 2009, at 12:58 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
I've been reading the dspam docs this morning and the project owner
states fairly strongly that sendmail is far preferable to SMTP
re-injection (in the postfix setup docs), but doesn't say why.
if he doesn't say why
Hi:
After reading http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1471.html and http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1519.html
to help with my autoreply capability (and making sure i get it as
close to right as possible!), I am trying to ensure that I can take
all reasonable measures to get
On Dec 31, 2008, at 6:11 PM, mouss wrote:
Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
Hi:
After reading http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1471.html and
http://www.irbs.net/internet/postfix/0703/1519.html to help with my
autoreply capability (and making sure i get it as close to right as
possible!), I
Hi:
I am hoping I can ask for suggestions or pointers to help solve this
challenge.
I am trying to implement an autoreply capability. I am putting
together a script that will handle the messages.
Many of the autoreply examples I've found suggest implementing this by:
main.cf:
Hi:
I am having a problem with duplicate bcc's (from recipient_bcc_maps)
and I suspect I know why - but I hope someone can point me to a
solution.
I have a content filter set up for dspam (content_filter = dspam:dspam
in main.cf) set up as described in the Advanced content filter
48 matches
Mail list logo
