On May 21, 2007, at 11:09 PM, Nicholas Geti wrote:
Let's make it easier for you to understand, I know it will be hard to
stretch you imagination, but give it a try.
We (a very powerful country) have invaded USA to set you free from
this
terrorist leader Sad... sorry, Dubya.
Now, for sure
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 7:42 am, Ed Leafe wrote:
To Americans looking at Iraq, these
people are insurgents who need to be destroyed. To the occupied
Iraqis, though, these people are heroes fighting against the foreign
invaders.
Hi Ed!
It's not that simple. Iraqis have been killing each other
Theisen
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 7:27 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 7:42 am, Ed Leafe wrote:
To Americans looking at Iraq, these
people are insurgents who need to be destroyed. To the occupied
Iraqis, though, these people are heroes
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 8:26 am, Pete Theisen wrote:
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 7:42 am, Ed Leafe wrote:
To Americans looking at Iraq, these
people are insurgents who need to be destroyed. To the occupied
Iraqis, though, these people are heroes fighting against the foreign
invaders.
Hi Ed!
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 8:23 am, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
Now this is where I disagree.
We do not have to force our democracy on anybody
Hi Virgil!
We take democracy with us wherever we go. We don't have to impose democracy,
however, just order.
But since Iraq controls so much oil they are
Nicholas Geti wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Hi Petey,
Can't you get it through your thick head? You are in THEIR country
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Nicholas Geti wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ProFox Email List
Nicholas Geti wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Nicholas Geti wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Hi Petey,
Can't you get it through your thick head? You are in THEIR country, and
they want you OUT (does
http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Nicholas Geti
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 10:09 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
- Original Message -
From: Ricardo Aráoz
Yes. Below is an excerpt form the wiki under the section titled
Immediate responses to the Pearl Harbor attack.
#---
Upon the bombing of Pearl Harbor, Presidential Proclamations 2525
(Japanese), 2526 (German) and 2527 (Italian) were signed. Many homes
were
Which gets back to my original question: How do you define victory?
There will be no 'victory'. That was the wrong frame of reference all
along.
If you really want an answer, then change the frame of reference and
talk about pursuing justice, not victory, and then finally we can make
some
Bill Arnold wrote:
Which gets back to my original question: How do you define victory?
There will be no 'victory'. That was the wrong frame of reference all
along.
If you really want an answer, then change the frame of reference and
talk about pursuing justice, not victory, and then
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007 9:39 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
It's not that simple, Pete. Most male Muslims are not radicals
extremist. Like Christianity, there are many denominations within the
Muslim religion. For example, consider
Which gets back to my original question: How do you define victory?
There will be no 'victory'. That was the wrong frame of reference
all
along.
If you really want an answer, then change the frame of reference and
talk about pursuing justice, not victory, and then finally we
, May 18, 2007 10:51 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
On Friday 18 May 2007 11:09 pm, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
I've had the opportunity to work with many male muslims as a contractor.
Excellent people and good people.
Hi Virgil!
But what are they doing now, sending
On Saturday 19 May 2007 7:17 am, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
The last one I worked with preferred to be here and he is just as American
as you or I.
Don't forget that all of us are descended from foreigners.
He preferred to be here because of their caste system.
If he had stayed over there, he
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 6:44 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
On Saturday 19 May 2007 7:17 am, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
The last one I worked with preferred to be here and he is just as American
as you or I.
Don't forget that all of us are descended from
Your raving like a radical extremist yourself, Pete. g
Regards,
LelandJ
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007 11:40 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
snip
This really creates a problem for most of the Iraq people that just want
to be left alone. The radical extremist Muslims are
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007 9:39 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
It's not that simple, Pete. Most male Muslims are not radicals
extremist. Like Christianity, there are many denominations within the
On Saturday 19 May 2007 10:32 am, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Your raving like a radical extremist yourself, Pete. g
Hi Leland~
g to you as well!
It worked in WW II. If it hadn't worked the libs and Ds would be favoring it
now.
They aren't innocent. Just by being 'slims they are placed
The Internment Camps, Work Camps, Concentration Camps, Galags or
whatever you chose to call them, were the most shameful acts commit
against a harmless class of US citizen in American history. The camps
were ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court and eventually lead to
official apologies
On Saturday 19 May 2007 1:09 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
The Internment Camps, Work Camps, Concentration Camps, Galags or
whatever you chose to call them, were the most shameful acts commit
against a harmless class of US citizen in American history. The camps
were ruled unconstitutional
I went back and re-read that portion of the Wiki, and I'm shocked that
the Supreme Court ruled Constitutional the way the Japanese American's
civil rights were violated. I certainly don't think this could happen
today except in the undeniable presents of the gravest threat to the
American
On Saturday 19 May 2007 1:54 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
I went back and re-read that portion of the Wiki, and I'm shocked that
the Supreme Court ruled Constitutional the way the Japanese American's
civil rights were violated. I certainly don't think this could happen
today except in
The Supreme Court probably upheld President Roosevelt's Executive Order
9066, because it was written such that all people could be excluded from
certain areas of the U.S., but then President Roosevelt used it
exclusively against Americans of Japanese ancestry. The way President
Roosevelt went
Not if the US establishes the proper system to prevent such terrorist
acts. I reintegrate that prevention of such act by use of the criminal
justice system, law enforcement, boarder patrol, NSA, CIA, FBI, etc is
the key to success, not preemptive war that only aggravate the terrorist
threat.
On Saturday 19 May 2007 2:03 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
The Supreme Court probably upheld President Roosevelt's Executive Order
9066, because it was written such that all people could be excluded from
certain areas of the U.S., but then President Roosevelt used it
exclusively against
On Saturday 19 May 2007 2:08 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Not if the US establishes the proper system to prevent such terrorist
acts. I reintegrate that prevention of such act by use of the criminal
justice system, law enforcement, boarder patrol, NSA, CIA, FBI, etc is
the key to success
Also, it should be noted that the Japanese Americas, who were placed
into internment, were not in a position where they could bring a law
suit aginst the US government for the reprehensible treatment that so
violated them as human being and violated their constitutional rights as
American
On Saturday 19 May 2007 2:23 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Also, it should be noted that the Japanese Americas, who were placed
into internment, were not in a position where they could bring a law
suit aginst the US government for the reprehensible treatment that so
violated them as human
On Saturday 19 May 2007 2:30 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
With the price of land per area these days, even out in the the nowhere
of Texas, and property taxes due to the county in which the land
resides, and the cowboys around the area that seem to know what going on
around their land, a
On Saturday 19 May 2007 2:42 pm, Pete Theisen wrote:
On Saturday 19 May 2007 2:23 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Also, it should be noted that the Japanese Americas, who were placed
into internment, were not in a position where they could bring a law
suit aginst the US government for the
Is the section below regarding Legal Legacy what you're talking about
regarding several law suits:? If so, it should be noted key evidence was
withheld or destroyed, and documents were intensionally aaltered that
would have surely altered the decision of the Supreme Court regarding
these cases
On Saturday 19 May 2007 3:34 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Is the section below regarding Legal Legacy what you're talking about
regarding several law suits
Hi Leland!
Yes. The situation with the 'slims is far, far worse than the deal was with
the Japs. The Japs were wearing uniforms and
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
I went back and re-read that portion of the Wiki, and I'm shocked that
the Supreme Court ruled Constitutional the way the Japanese American's
civil rights were violated.
Did the same happen with USA citizens from German origin? And with Italians?
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Saturday 19 May 2007 3:34 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Is the section below regarding Legal Legacy what you're talking about
regarding several law suits
Hi Leland!
Yes. The situation with the 'slims is far, far worse than the deal was with
the Japs. The Japs
Exactly.
We still haven't pulled out from Germany
Which gets back to my original question: How do you define victory?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this
On May 18, 2007, at 5:25 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote:
We still haven't pulled out from Germany
Which gets back to my original question: How do you define victory?
You don't, because then you can be held to a standard. Remember
Mission Accomplished? They learned their lesson, and have
What was the exit strategy from WWII?
--- Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 18, 2007, at 5:25 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote:
We still haven't pulled out from Germany
Which gets back to my original question: How do
you define victory?
You don't, because then you can be held
On Friday 18 May 2007 5:27 pm, Ed Leafe wrote:
On May 18, 2007, at 5:25 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote:
We still haven't pulled out from Germany
Which gets back to my original question: How do you define victory?
You don't, because then you can be held to a standard. Remember
Mission
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
On May 18, 2007, at 5:25 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote:
We still haven't pulled out from Germany
Which gets back to my original question: How do you define victory?
You don't, because then you can be held to a standard. Remember
Mission
Acts of Terror are really crimes and can originate from any of thousands
of radicals groups across a broad spectrum of ideologies, cultures,
customs, races, religions, sexual orientations, genders, etc. The
thousands of terrorist groups have no common denominator under which
they can be
On Friday 18 May 2007 7:59 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
Acts of Terror are really crimes and can originate from any of thousands
of radicals groups across a broad spectrum of ideologies, cultures,
customs, races, religions, sexual orientations, genders, etc. The
thousands of terrorist
It's not that simple, Pete. Most male Muslims are not radicals
extremist. Like Christianity, there are many denominations within the
Muslim religion. For example, consider Sunni and Shiite, and even
within these groups their are many subgroups made up of mostly harmless
men, women, and
On Friday 18 May 2007 9:39 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
It's not that simple, Pete. Most male Muslims are not radicals
extremist. Like Christianity, there are many denominations within the
Muslim religion. For example, consider Sunni and Shiite, and even
within these groups their are
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 8:40 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
It's not that simple, Pete. Most male Muslims are not radicals
extremist. Like Christianity, there are many denominations within
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007 9:39 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
It's not that simple, Pete. Most male Muslims are not radicals
extremist. Like Christianity, there are many denominations within the
Muslim religion. For example, consider Sunni and Shiite, and even
within
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007 9:39 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
It's not that simple, Pete. Most male Muslims are not radicals
extremist. Like Christianity, there are many denominations within the
Muslim religion. For example, consider
Pete Theisen wrote:
On Friday 18 May 2007 9:39 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
It's not that simple, Pete. Most male Muslims are not radicals
extremist. Like Christianity, there are many denominations within the
Muslim religion. For example, consider Sunni and Shiite, and even
within
On Friday 18 May 2007 11:09 pm, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
I've had the opportunity to work with many male muslims as a contractor.
Excellent people and good people.
Hi Virgil!
But what are they doing now, sending money to Hamas?
--
Regards,
Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/
On Friday 18 May 2007 11:15 pm, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
Finally, a good explanation grin
Hi Virgil!
I see the grin and I know you remember that this is from the man who has
declared himself to be God.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME
On Friday 18 May 2007 11:40 pm, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
snip
This really creates a problem for most of the Iraq people that just want
to be left alone. The radical extremist Muslims are killing them
because they are either Sunni or Shiite, or because they have become
associated with the
Let's see, we killed the former leader. Doesn't that
count for anything?
--- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
Name a Democrat who wants to win in Iraq. Name a
Democrat who doesn't want to surrender in Iraq.
Hahaha! You name a Repub who is actually winning
] An Inconvenient Poll
Let's see, we killed the former leader. Doesn't that
count for anything?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 17 May 2007 07:09
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Let's see, we killed the former leader. Doesn't
that
count for anything?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 17 May 2007 07:09
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Let's see, we killed the former leader. Doesn't
that
count for anything?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 17 May 2007 08:02
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Shut up or we'll kill your queen too. Elton John.
--- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Did we, I thought that we just captured him and
his
trial
] An Inconvenient Poll
I keep forgetting we allowed you back in the country.
--- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stop being a knee jerk twat Michael, I said that
with my US citizen hat
on which is why I used the word we.
DOH!
___
Post Messages
Madigan
Sent: 17 May 2007 09:09
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
I keep forgetting we allowed you back in the
country.
--- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stop being a knee jerk twat Michael, I said that
with my US citizen hat
on which is why I
Adam Buckland wrote:
But I guess you won't complain about the tax return I file in each
country and the cheque/check I send each year.
Depends. Let's see the size of that check, please. :-)
--
Vince Teachout
Caracal Software
www.caracal.net
518-733-9411
Name a Democrat who wants to win in Iraq. Name a
Democrat who doesn't want to surrender in Iraq.
First, you have to define what winning in Iraq is.
-Jerry Wolper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
The same as winning in Germany and winning in Japan.
--- Jerry Wolper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Name a Democrat who wants to win in Iraq. Name a
Democrat who doesn't want to surrender in Iraq.
First, you have to define what winning in Iraq is.
-Jerry Wolper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007.
--- Jerry Wolper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, you have to define what winning in Iraq
is.
The same as winning in Germany and winning in
Japan.
At what point? 1945? 1953? 1991?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
2007.
Then ask me in 60 years.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive:
Exactly.
We still haven't pulled out from Germany
--- Jerry Wolper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007.
Then ask me in 60 years.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
Michael Madigan wrote:
Let's see, we killed the former leader. Doesn't that
count for anything?
LOL
Nope, nothing at all. But I guess you'll never understand patriots.
--- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
Name a Democrat who wants to win in Iraq. Name
PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Michael Madigan wrote:
Let's see, we killed the former leader. Doesn't that
count for anything?
LOL
Nope, nothing at all. But I guess you'll never understand patriots.
--- Ricardo Aráoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael
] On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 17 May 2007 08:02
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Shut up or we'll kill your queen too. Elton John.
--- Adam Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did we, I thought that we just captured him and his
trial and execution
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ricardo Aráoz
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 6:15 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Michael Madigan wrote:
Let's see, we killed the former leader. Doesn't that
count
Of Ricardo Aráoz
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 6:37 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
Now how could the butcher of Iraq be considered a patriot ?
Nope, not him. But for example the ones who killed those soldiers this
week in revenge for the raped
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ricardo Aráoz
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 6:37 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
Now how could the butcher of Iraq be considered a patriot ?
Nope, not him
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 10:52 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 10:43 pm, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
I understand.
BUT, do you want to see people go to jail because they can't afford
Isn't it wonderful having the best legal system money can buy...
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 10:43 pm, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
I understand.
BUT, do you want to see people go to jail because they can't afford
the
attorney, OR because they're guilty.
, May 16, 2007 5:01 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Isn't it wonderful having the best legal system money can buy...
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 10:43 pm, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
I understand.
BUT, do you want to see people go to jail because they can't afford
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 11:56 pm, Michael Madigan wrote:
They tried to remove Lieberman from the Democratic
Party, so I guess technically he's still a Democrat.
Zell Miller is no longer in the senate.
It's hard to find some, isn't it.
What happened to the Harry Truman Democrats? Have
they
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 5:54 am, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
You're missing the point pete. If the attorney recused himself because their
client admitted to them that they did it, then they deserve to go to jail
Hi Virgil!
You are missing the point, the constitution allows a guilty person
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 6:00 am, Adam Buckland wrote:
Isn't it wonderful having the best legal system money can buy...
Hi Adam!
From a distance it looks as though there is plenty of money spent on your
legal system. Why those silly wigs alone . . .
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 10:43 pm,
://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 6:30 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 5:54 am
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 7:24 am, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
snip
Do you want to see these types of people set free so that they can kill
again ?
Hi Virgil!
If they can't be convicted without changing the constitution, yes.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://www.pete-theisen.com/
/index.php
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Pete Theisen
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 7:21 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 7:24 am, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
snip
Do you want to see
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 8:27 am, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
Damn, no wonder we're out of control.
Things are simple out here.
Your neighbors dog gets into your livestock.
You shoot it so that it can't do it again.
The scum of the earth should be treated the same way.
Hi Virgil!
You were
: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 8:27 am, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
Damn, no wonder we're out of control.
Things are simple out here.
Your neighbors dog gets into your livestock.
You shoot it so that it can't do it again.
The scum of the earth should be treated the same way
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 8:42 am, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
If the dog was caught with a dead goat and blood all over him, yep, he's
dead.
Me a liberal ?
On some points maybe, but not very many.
I believe in an eye for an eye.
I believe that all murderers (guilty without a doubt) should
Michael Madigan wrote:
Name a Democrat who wants to win in Iraq. Name a
Democrat who doesn't want to surrender in Iraq.
Hahaha! You name a Repub who is actually winning in Iraq! hahaha
From the same place Republicans find the chutzpah
to blame the
Democrats for ensur[ing] our defeat
If Bill Clinton were president with the same exact
scenario, his poll numbers would be in the high 50s.
The fact that Bush can't speak very well is the whole
problem in a nutshell.
With record low unemployment, record high stock
market, record high home ownership, and all this great
economic
I keep hearing the GOP harping on the Democrats for advocating defeat in
Iraq, but defeat in Iraq has never been clearly defined by the GOP or
the Bush Administration. If defeat in Iraq is possible, then victory in
Iraq must also be possible, yet the GOP has never clearly defined the
term
Lord knows I'm no expert in polling, but I wonder where the Dems find the
chutzpah to declare they've got some kind of plurality of public opinion
in their favor over the President at the moment, as they boldly plot a
political strategy to ensure our defeat and humiliation in Iraq, in order
President Bush is in a state of denial, because reality is
unacceptable. I heard Newt Gingrich recently on a Sunday morning TV
talk show. In one of his responses to a question, he began blabbering
about a world wide threat from Muslims. He said that twelve year old
children are being taught
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 4:15 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
President Bush is in a state of denial, because reality is
unacceptable. I heard Newt Gingrich recently
Jerry Wolper wrote:
but I wonder where the Dems find the
chutzpah to declare they've got some kind of plurality of public opinion
in their favor over the President at the moment
From the same place Republicans find the chutzpah to blame the
Democrats for ensur[ing] our defeat and
http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 4:15 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
President Bush is in a state of denial
://www.bierschwalesolutions.com
http://www.jobsforourfuture.com/index.php
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 4:36 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
The focus
, May 15, 2007 4:15 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
President Bush is in a state of denial, because reality is
unacceptable. I heard Newt Gingrich recently on a Sunday morning TV
talk show. In one of his responses to a question, he began blabbering
about
4:44 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
The last time I looked, terrorists or occupying armies did not ask for a
visa.
They simply came in however they could and accomplished their objective.
Lets say you are right and nothing happens
Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
When did you acquire the ability to known when anyone is guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt? America is blessed because we have a Constitution
that guarantees freedoms, due process, and privacy. Part of the
Judicial system call for any accused to be put on
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Leland F. Jackson, CPA
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 4:36 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
The focus on crime, like the crime people commit when that commit act of
terrorism, should
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 6:01 pm, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
Actually I like this system except for one minor little detail.
It should become immediately an offense where the attorney loses his
license forever in the event that he/she knowingly defend somebody where
he/she knows beyond a shadow
: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 6:34 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] An Inconvenient Poll
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 6:01 pm, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
Actually I like this system except for one minor little detail.
It should become immediately an offense where the attorney loses his
license forever
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 7:39 pm, Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
Two choices:
1. Fix the problem
2. bury your head in the sand and not fix the problem.
Hi Virgil!
I think the problem is the opposite of what you stated. You think it is
terrible that guilty people get to have lawyers, evidently
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
