On Monday 11 September 2006 02:26, Anthony L. Testi wrote:
Hi Anthony!
Once you understand liberal hate, you will have the answer. The C-crowd used
to call it "spin". When the Ds do something, it is statesmanship, when the Rs
do the *same* thing, it is lying.
Of course, the president never sai
On Monday 11 September 2006 15:13, Anthony L. Testi wrote:
> Far from knee-jerk thou. I attempt to think about thinng
Hi Anthony!
Yes, I too attempt to think about thinngs. Every nnight.
Regards,
Pete
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscrip
On Monday 11 September 2006 15:22, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2006, at 2:38 PM, john harvey wrote:
> > To lie means to knowingly make a false statement. A statement that
> > is made,
> > based on faulty information, is not necessarily a lie.
>
> To know that there is conflicting information
Anthony,
Good to have you back.
> Are (some) people upset because they think President Bush lied to them
> for the reasons we went into Iraq? If so was it because they
> belived what they think he said and felt that we should go, later
> finding out that it was a 'lie' so felt betrayed? Or maybe
Michael Madigan <> wrote:
> Most conservatives aren't knee-jerk. Conservatism is the "thinking
> man"'s philosophy, while Liberalism is the "feeling man"'s
> philosophy. The last time I checked a knee-jerk doesn't require any
> thinking.
>
> "I feel your pain" as opposed to "I understand what
Michael Madigan <> wrote:
> Just remember: Liberalism is a mental disorder.
>
> Do we try to understand the motivations of schizophrenics or do we
> try to treat them with the proper medication? We should treat
> liberals the same way.
Mikie needs to get back on the Meds cycle again. I gues
john harvey <> wrote:
> To lie means to knowingly make a false statement. A statement that is
> made, based on faulty information, is not necessarily a lie. It's the
> old truth tables from Logic 101. The conclusions he reached were the
> same as the Democrats who were given the same information an
On Monday, September 11, 2006 3:24 PM Ed Leafe wrote:
> Correction: the war was declared over by President Bush in May
2003.
>We are now an occupying army in a defeated country.
Not according to one of my favorite sites, http://www.dubyaspeak.com:
WILLIAMS: Do you have any moments of dou
On Sep 11, 2006, at 2:38 PM, john harvey wrote:
We are at war, get over it.
Correction: the war was declared over by President Bush in May 2003.
We are now an occupying army in a defeated country.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_
I've probably told this story before, but I never
forget being in San Francisco touring around looking
for Haight-Ashbury. I'm walking around with my
girlfriend and a fairly-expensive Nikon camera around
my neck. A man in a dress came up to us with a black
eye and asked whether he could take our
On Sep 11, 2006, at 2:38 PM, john harvey wrote:
To lie means to knowingly make a false statement. A statement that
is made,
based on faulty information, is not necessarily a lie.
To know that there is conflicting information and to knowingly
disregard information that fails to advance the
> the result is that most of my conclusions do seem to
> land in the conservative realm.
>
> -Original Message-
> >From: Michael Madigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Sep 11, 2006 2:59 PM
> >To: ProFox Email List
> >Subject: RE: [OT] Another Bus
2:59 PM
>To: ProFox Email List
>Subject: RE: [OT] Another Bush Lie
>
>Anthony's the Foxpro list's Conservative Prodigal Son.
> Welcome back, by the way.
>
Anthony L. Testi
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscripti
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Anthony L. Testi
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:42 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Another Bush Lie
>
> 'We are at war, get over it."
> Was that comment directed at me?
If the shoe fits, go ahead and put it on. If not, discard the comment.
Thanks,
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Anthony L. Testi
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:42 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Another Bush Lie
&#x
t: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:30 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Another Bush Lie
>
> Are (some) people upset because they think President
> Bush lied to them for
> the reasons we went into Iraq? If so was it because
> they belived what they
> think he sa
On Monday, September 11, 2006 2:40 PM Michael Madigan wrote:
>Oregon, Washington and California are liberal sewers, as you've no
doubt know first hand. For some
>reason the crazies gravitated there.
It is the LEFT coast! 8-)
David L. Crooks
___
P
'We are at war, get over it."
Was that comment directed at me? If so why?
Anthony
>
-Original Message-
>From: john harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>To lie means to knowingly make a false statement. A statement that is made,
>based on faulty information, is not necessarily a lie. It's the ol
Just remember: Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Do we try to understand the motivations of
schizophrenics or do we try to treat them with the
proper medication? We should treat liberals the same
way.
There is a huge number of people who think the World
Trade Center was rigged with explosives a
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Anthony L. Testi
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:30 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Another Bush Lie
Are (some) people upset because they think President Bush lied to them for
the reasons we went into Iraq? If so was it because they belived what they
thi
Are (some) people upset because they think President Bush lied to them for the
reasons we went into Iraq? If so was it because they belived what they think
he said and felt that we should go, later finding out that it was a 'lie' so
felt betrayed? Or maybe they 'knew' it was a lie at the start
gt; Of Ed Leafe
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 12:34 PM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Another Bush Lie
>
> On Sep 11, 2006, at 1:03 PM, john harvey wrote:
>
> > Well, we ALL linked them together, but the
> president never said it.
>
> I w
Yep, old Bush is pretty smart for a dummy!
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 12:34 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Another Bush Lie
On Sep 11, 2006, at 1:03 PM, john harvey wrote
On Sep 11, 2006, at 1:03 PM, john harvey wrote:
Well, we ALL linked them together, but the president never said it.
I will grant that he and everyone else in the administration was
exceedingly careful not to utter those exact words. However, if every
time I spoke about you I mentioned "ch
;
> John
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Michael Madigan
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 11:53 AM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Another Bush Lie
>
> No one ever linked 911 with Iraq
M
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Another Bush Lie
No one ever linked 911 with Iraq. That is not true
--- Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2006, at 2:26 AM, Anthony L. Testi wrote:
>
> > The following quote from the online WSJ summerizes
> my thi
No one ever linked 911 with Iraq. That is not true
--- Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2006, at 2:26 AM, Anthony L. Testi wrote:
>
> > The following quote from the online WSJ summerizes
> my thinking, but
> > I am open to changing it.
> >
> > "This administration never said t
>
> > The following quote from the online WSJ summerizes my thinking, but
> > I am open to changing it.
> >
> > "This administration never said that the 9/11 attacks were
> > orchestrated between Saddam and al Qaeda," Bush said. "We did say
> > there were numerous contacts between Saddam Hussein
On Monday, September 11, 2006 2:27 AM Anthony L. Testi wrote:
>I'm wondering ( Not a joke, not a baiting ,really wondering. )
when/where did the President say that >Saddam had anything directly to
do with 9/11?
>From http://www.dubyaspeak.com/freshdubya.phtml:
DUBYA: Imagine a world in which S
Thank you Ed for providing this information. It will take me a day or two
before I have the time to read it.
Anthony
-Original Message-
>From: Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sep 11, 2006 8:01 AM
>To: ProFox Email List
>Subject: Re: [OT] Another Bush Lie
>
>
On Sep 11, 2006, at 2:26 AM, Anthony L. Testi wrote:
The following quote from the online WSJ summerizes my thinking, but
I am open to changing it.
"This administration never said that the 9/11 attacks were
orchestrated between Saddam and al Qaeda," Bush said. "We did say
there were numero
He never did. You win the cupie doll.
--- "Anthony L. Testi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About to step into a mine field, lets see how far I
> can get before it blows up in my face...
>
> I'm wondering ( Not a joke, not a baiting ,really
> wondering. ) when/where did the President say that
>
About to step into a mine field, lets see how far I can get before it blows up
in my face...
I'm wondering ( Not a joke, not a baiting ,really wondering. ) when/where did
the President say that Saddam had anything directly to do with 9/11? Was it in
the UN speech, or around that time? I've h
33 matches
Mail list logo
