On Sep 14, 2009, at 11:00 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Arthur Barstow
art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
On Sep 13, 2009, at 1:06 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
It is optional for a user agent to support the widgets
[Widgets-DigSig] specification.
]]
Why did you
Below are some comments regarding the 4-August-2009 Last Call Working
Draft of the WARP spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-access-20090804/
-Regards, Art Barstow
1. This spec is missing a statement about which sections are
normative and which are non-normative as well as the
All,
On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:35 PM, ext Marcin Hanclik wrote:
Herewith I would like to ask for extending the LC period for AE
LCWD by 1 week.
I have just provided some comments and have a feeling that I could
provide more, specifically related to ViewModes and WebStorage.
As with all of
Below is the draft agenda for the September 17 Widgets Voice
Conference (VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting:
Below is an email from Addison (forwarded with his permission) re the
IRI/URI normalization thread.
-Regards, Art Barstow
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Phillips, Addison addi...@amazon.com
Date: September 16, 2009 1:13:58 PM EDT
To: Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) art.bars...@nokia.com,
The draft minutes from the September 17 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/09/17-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 24 September
Below is some information about a 1-day BarCamp-type gathering on
accessible media to be held at Stanford on Sunday November 1
(precedes the W3C's annual TPAC meeting week [1]).
The organizers of this event are Apple's David Singer and Stanford's
John Foliot. If want to attend, you are
All,
The Web Security Context Working Group asked WebApps to review
Section 7.4 of their Web Security Context Working Group spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-ui/#robustness-apis
If you have any comments, please send to the following list by
September 24 at the latest:
The title of the spec is actually Web Security Context: User
Interface Guidelines:
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-ui/#robustness-api
On Sep 17, 2009, at 1:57 PM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:
All,
The Web Security Context Working Group asked WebApps to review
Section 7.4 of their Web
All,
Months ago, I reserved a room on November 2-3 so that WebApps' API
group [API] could meet f2f during the W3C's annual TPAC meeting week
(Nov 2-6 [TPAC]). I reserved a separate meeting room on those same
days for WebApps' widgets group [Widgets].
I started an agenda for the Widget
On Sep 17, 2009, at 7:47 PM, ext Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
This is a request to publish the WebSimpleDatabase draft as FPWD.
Please let me know if you need anything from me.
The draft can be accessed from http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/
WebSimpleDatabase/
I will start a CfC for a FPWD of this
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the First Public
Working Draft (FPWD) of the Web Simple Database API spec:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebSimpleDatabase/
As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The
On Sep 18, 2009, at 6:39 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
On Sep 17, 2009, at 22:19 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
1. Please indicate those API specs you want to discuss at this f2f
meeting and a brief list of the relevant topic(s).
I'd like for Arun and DAP (and anyone interested) to have a chat about
Hi Marcos,
On Sep 21, 2009, at 2:08 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
For the sake of the DoC, can you please acknowledge that the comments
below have been addressed and your are satisfied with the way the WG
addressed your comments.
Based on the exchanges we had regarding the 3 sets of comments
There now is a page for this gathering including instructions on how
to register:
http://www.w3.org/2009/09/acc-media-html-gathering.html
On Sep 17, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:
Below is some information about a 1-day BarCamp-type gathering on
accessible media to
Given WebApps' CORS spec, this Workshop (November 17-18 in
Luxembourg) may be of interest to you:
http://www.w3.org/2009/policy-ws/cfp.html
-Regards, Art Barstow
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Ian Jacobs i...@w3.org
Date: September 22, 2009 4:17:49 PM EDT
Subject: W3C Workshop on
Below is the draft agenda for the September 24 Widgets Voice
Conference (VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged).
Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting:
All,
I think we all appreciate frank and open technical discussions about
the Web Applications WG's specifications but we must also be
respectful and professional in our exchanges.
My personal tolerance for terse exchanges is relatively high but that
is not true for everyone and we must
Below are comments regarding rev1.1 of the View Modes Media Feature
spec:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/waf/widgets-vm/vm-mediafeature.src.html
-Regards, Art Barstow
1. Abstract:
a. I don't understand the document's content in this context.
b. Missing a sentence terminator for the first
The draft minutes from the September 24 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/09/24-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 1 October 2009
On Sep 27, 2009, at 7:33 PM, ext Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
ECMA TC39 (the group responsible for ECMAScript) has expressed a
strong interest in having a list for joint discussion with the W3C,
and particularly the Web Apps WG. And they are especially interested
in review of Web IDL. I suggest we
All,
In case you did not know, Scott is now a member of WebApps. Welcome
Scott!
I'd like to understand the status of the The widget Interface (TWI)
[TWI] spec and what, if any, issues are still open?
I've noted these two exchanges from Scott and Marcos and I don't see
consensus:
1.
Hi All,
Wow! The amount of email on Web IDL over the last few days has been
amazing!
I am wondering out loud here if it would make sense to split up the
Web IDL spec? For example, a functional split e.g. the IDL in one
doc, ES 3/5 bindings in a separate doc, Java bindings in a separate
Below is the draft agenda for the October 1 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting:
On Oct 1, 2009, at 5:58 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
A rough schedule would then be: during the Nov 2-3 f2f meeting agree
to all changes for LC#3; November 10 LC#3 is published and Exclusion
period begins; December 1 LC#3 ends; Dec 9 CR#2 is published;
January 5 CR#2 ends as does the Exclusion
scribe ACTION: barstow add FPWD discusion of CC spec to Oct 8
agenda [recorded in
[35]http://www.w3.org/2009/10/01-wam-minutes.html#action02]
trackbot Created ACTION-409 - Add FPWD discusion of CC spec to Oct
8 agenda [on Arthur Barstow - due 2009-10-08].
MC: all of the tests were
Sorry for the cross posting ...
Doug - since I've had at least one question about the use and scope
of public-script-coord with respect to the Web IDL, would you please
clarify if it should be used for all future discussions related to
Web IDL or just coordination-related discussions re
On Aug 12, 2009, at 7:35 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue
Tracker wrote:
ISSUE-95: PC CR: Conformance checker behavior intermixed with UA
behavior [Widgets]
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/95
Raised by: Marcos Caceres
On product: Widgets
On 11-Aug-2009, Marcos
Marcos, All,
During the processing of content in Step 7, if the custom start
file is bogus (and the spec indicates a few reasons why it could be
bogus), widget start file will be null when the UA completes Step
7. In this case, we presumably want the UA to run all of Step 8, in
When scanning the Test Suite Version of the PC spec I noticed some
MAY and OPTIONAL assertions for which there are no associated test
assertions. This implies these assertions aren't really necessary
and should be removed or made non-Normative (e.g. hints to an
implementor).
Section 2:
On Oct 5, 2009, at 11:31 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I updated CORS over the past few days:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/
I suggest we try to resolve the remaining open issues in the issue
tracker
during the F2F.
In case someone doesn't know about WebApps' issue
Since the schema and Authoring guidelines are both non-normative, the
P+C spec is not clear if an element's attributes are required or not.
The spec should clearly state, with normative text, if an element's
attribute(s) are required or not.
-Regards, Art Barstow
Below is the draft agenda for the October 8 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting:
Hi,
WebApps does have a related deliverable in its charter:
[[
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/charter/#deliverables
Metadata Access and Extensible Information for Media (MAXIM)
a generic API for accessing metadata embedded in or linked to
media files
]]
However, as you can see from
with me.)
LOL!
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Arthur Barstow
art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Since the schema and Authoring guidelines are both non-normative,
the P+C
spec is not clear if an element's attributes are required or not.
When you say required (passive voice), do you mean:
My
On Oct 7, 2009, at 10:11 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Arthur Barstow
art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:25 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
(Apologies up front, the following is going to to seem like a rather
dumb and slightly condescending
On Oct 7, 2009, at 1:57 PM, ext Michael Cooper wrote:
Thank you for your responses to our comments. The PFWG formally
accepts your disposition of these issues. There is some discussion
inline below as input into requirements for future versions of the
spec.
I added a pointer to this
ACTION: barstow contact RIM and ask them to join WebApps
[recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2009/10/08-wam-minutes.html#action01]
trackbot Created ACTION-412 - Contact RIM and ask them to join
WebApps [on Arthur Barstow - due 2009-10-15].
P+C: Issue #88
AB: Issue #88 ( [25]http
The Patent Advisory Group that was formed for the Widgets 1.0 Updates
spec has now closed and the PAG recommends the work continue.
The PAG's Final Report is:
http://www.w3.org/2009/03/widgets-pag/pagreport.html
The PAG concluded Apple's patent is considered not essential to the
Bcc to: www-...@w3.org and public-pkg-uri-sch...@w3.org
On Oct 8 WebApps WG published a Last Call Working Draft of the
Widgets 1.0: Widgets URIs spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-uri-20091008/
The deadline for comments is 10 November and all comments should be
sent to
On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:49 AM, ext Adam Barth wrote:
If this is not access control, I must ask: what do you mean by
access control?
I'm not sure the abstract question of whether CORS is an access
control system is that meaningful. We should concentrate on the
following questions:
1) Does
Below is the draft agenda for the October 15 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting:
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the First Public
Working Draft (FPWD) of the DataCache API spec:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DataCache/
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to record the group's
decision to request advancement.
By publishing this FPWD, the group
On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:29 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
In Step 5 [1], the spec reads:
If this range begins with the subtag i, x, or the range is marked
as deprecated in the IANA Language Subtag Registry, skip all the
steps in this algorithm below, and move onto the next range.
I believe that,
FYI, Thomas is organizing a bar-BOF during TPAC meeting week re Web
security.
See below for more information including a Doodle registration poll.
-R, Art Barstow
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Thomas Roessler t...@w3.org
Date: October 20, 2009 1:32:07 PM EDT
Folks,
as a quick
Below is the draft agenda for the October 22 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting:
As expected, the Media Annotations WG has published a First Public
Working Draft (FPWD) of their API for Media Resource 1.0:
[[
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-20091020/
Abstract
This specification defines a client-side API to access metadata
information related to media
and WebApps' APIs group to meet f2f [recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2009/10/22-wam-minutes.html#action04]
trackbot Created ACTION-423 - Work with Robin, FH, and Chaals to
get DAP and WebApps' APIs group to meet f2f [on Arthur Barstow - due
2009-10-29].
scribe ACTION: Robin work
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the following document
as Last Call Working Draft #3 of the Widgets 1.0: Packaging and
Configuration spec:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/Overview_TSE.html
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to record the group's
decision to
All,
Two things ...
1. Hixie has prepared: Web Database, Web Storage, Web Sockets, Web
Workers and Server-sent Events specs for new publications in /TR/.
Separately, I will start a relatively short CfC to publish these
specs as new Working Drafts.
The main reason we will use a short CfC
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish new Working Drafts of
the following specs:
1. Server-Sent Events
http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
2. Web Database
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/
3. Web Sockets API
http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/
4. Web Storage
Below is an email from Henry Thompson re CORS that I am forwarding
with HT's permission.
-Regards, Art Barstow
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Henry S. Thompson h...@inf.ed.ac.uk
Date: October 22, 2009 2:18:55 PM EDT
To: Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) art.bars...@nokia.com
Subject: CORS
On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:30 AM, ext Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
Fine for all except WebDatabase.
I notice that its present ED is virtually the same as its FPWD (modulo
a new section on data sensitivity). There is no movement on any of the
thorny issues - locking granularity, relational model and SQL
On Oct 21, 2009, at 11:04 AM, ext Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
(adding the Device APIs Working Group mailing list in CC:)
Hi John, Web Apps
Le lundi 19 octobre 2009 à 14:12 -0700, John Gregg a écrit :
Apologies for the delay, I've been spending the majority of my time
completing the
FYI, the Rich Web Application Backplane XG's Final Report has been
published:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/app-backplane/XGR-app-
backplane-20091030/
Keywords: Javascript, Web Application
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Ian Jacobs i...@w3.org
Date: October 27, 2009 12:05:50 PM
Below is the draft agenda for the October 29 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
NOTE for US PARTICIPANTS: the time will be ONE HOUR LATER!
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address
On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:19 AM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:43:15 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:11:23 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:09 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
there is
-minutes.html#action01]
trackbot Created ACTION-430 - Add security guidelines to the topic
list for Monday 16:30-18:00 time slot on Nov 2 [on Arthur Barstow -
due 2009-11-05].
drogersuk Thanks Art
AB: any other general comments on the agenda?
... we will discuss topic list
On Oct 29, 2009, at 11:54 AM, ext David Rogers wrote:
As discussed on the webapps call, in addition to Fredrick's proposal I
think we need to understand the relationship between DAP / Widgets /
WebApps / HTML5 more clearly. There are overlaps and architectural
disparities which we should
Earlier today I added a new Plans column to WebApps' two
publication status tables:
APIs specs:
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus#API_Specifications
Widget specs:
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus#Widgets_Specifications
For most of the specs, I entered what I think
WebApps has been asked to review the following LCWD by the Mobile Web
Best Practices WG:
Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies 1.0
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ct-guidelines-20091006/
If you have any comments, please send them - by November 6 at the
latest - to:
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the First Public
Working Draft (FPWD) of the File API spec, latest Editor's Draft at:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileUpload/publish/FileAPI.html
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to record the group's
decision to request
The draft minutes from the November 2 Widgets f2f meeting are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/11/02-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before November 12 (the next
[on Arthur Barstow - due 2009-11-10].
AB: when will the test suite be complete?
MC: next week
... want to publish test suite when we publish CR#2
MO: earlier today I sent some P+C comments to public-webapps
... re SVG icons and width and height
MC: there is a viewport
[ Marcos
Reminder ...
Begin forwarded message:
From: Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) art.bars...@nokia.com
Date: October 8, 2009 12:37:20 PM PDT
To: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Request for Comments: 8-Oct-2009 LCWD of Widgets 1.0:
Widget URIs; deadline 10 November
Reply-To:
To address the comments against the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of the Widgets
Interface (TWI) spec (formerly known as the APIs and Events spec),
Marcos made a sufficient number of changes to the spec such that a
new LCWD must be published.
Please review the latest Editor's Draft and submit comments
As noted on 23 October [1], the following HTML5 APIs are ready or
very close to being ready for Last Call Working Draft (LC):
1. Server-Sent Events
http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
2. Web Database
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/
3. Web Sockets API
On Nov 7, 2009, at 3:53 PM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
The draft minutes are included at
http://www.w3.org/2009/11/02-webapps-minutes.html starting from the
WebIDL
Thanks for the summaries Chaals!
Offline storage / databases
The SQL-based Web Database proposal will probably not
Anne has now resolved the last issue for XHR (1) and as discussed
during last week's f2f meeting [1], the spec is ready for a Last Call
Working Draft publication:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to record the group's
decision to
On Nov 11, 2009, at 7:30 AM, ext paul.dow...@bt.com wrote:
During our review we have one overall disappointment: whilst the
Use Cases describe saving local files programatically, the
specification does not provide any write methods.
We wondered if these were to be provided in a later version
Below is the draft agenda for the November 12 Widgets Voice
Conference (VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting:
Anne, All,
On Nov 10, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:
As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for
comments is November 18.
I support this publication.
Assuming we do get consensus
scribe ACTION: barstow schedule a Director's Call for PC CR #2
[recorded in
[25]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/12-wam-minutes.html#action01]
trackbot Created ACTION-451 - Schedule a Director's Call for PC
CR #2 [on Arthur Barstow - due 2009-11-19].
RB: we can go to CR while the CfE
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com
Date: November 17, 2009 11:50:04 AM EST
To: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: [widgets] Interface published
Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/4b02d43c.2040...@opera.com
Hi all,
Widget interface spec ready for
Below is the draft agenda for the 19 November Widgets Voice
Conference (VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting:
The draft minutes from the 19 November Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/11/19-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 3 December 2009
Hi All,
On Nov 4, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:
As noted on 23 October [1], the following HTML5 APIs are ready or
very close to being ready for Last Call Working Draft (LC):
1. Server-Sent Events
http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
2. Web Database
This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Last Call Working Draft of
each of the following specs:
1. Server-Sent Events
http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
2. Web Storage
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/
3. Web Workers
http://dev.w3.org/html5/workers/
This CfC satisfies the
Hi Dan,
Thanks for you comment. WebApps welcomes comments for any of its
specs at any time.
You are correct, however, that your comment below missed the LC#3
comment deadline and as such will not be reflected in CR#2. However,
we will discuss your e-mail and depending upon the results
Doug, Ian, All,
On Nov 21, 2009, at 4:53 AM, ext Doug Schepers wrote:
But if the WebDatabase spec is going to lie fallow for many months or
years, with no active editor, nor clear plans to update it, nor notion
of material that may be added to it (such as deciding on a SQL
dialect),
then
On Nov 18, 2009, at 6:49 PM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
this is a Call for consensus to request publishing the Selectors
API draft
at
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/selectors-api/
Overview.html?rev=1.101content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1
as a Candidate
On Nov 20, 2009, at 6:53 AM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:
This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Last Call Working Draft of
each of the following specs:
1. Server-Sent Events
http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
2. Web Storage
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/
3. Web
On Nov 27, 2009, at 5:14 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
to test ITS support, the WebApps WG would appreciate some
guidance with designing a handful of test cases that the i18n WG would
consider suitable to provide interoperability across implementations.
Please make sure the PC test suite does
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish Last Call Working Draft
#2 of:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access/
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to record the group's
decision to request advancement for this LCWD. Note that as
specified in the Process Document [PD], a
From: ext Ian Jacobs i...@w3.org
Date: November 30, 2009 12:08:22 PM EST
Subject: PAG Launched for WebApps Working Group Regarding Widgets
1.0: Access Requests Policy
...
In accordance with the W3C Patent Policy [0], W3C has launched a
Patent Advisory Group (PAG) to advise the W3C on a
December 8 is the deadline for comments regarding the Last Call
Working Draft of the Widget Interface spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-apis-20091117/
Comments should be sent to: public-webapps@w3.org
-Art Barstow
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Marcos Caceres
On Dec 1, 2009, at 4:22 PM, ext Marcin Hanclik wrote:
Our motivation is that the comments received during the LC#1 were
not all addressed.
I believe all of the comments submitted during the LC#1 comment
period (that ended 20-Sept-2009) were addressed. Since you indicate
otherwise, please
On Nov 20, 2009, at 12:12 PM, ext Marcin Hanclik wrote:
As discussed on the yesterday's call, I committed to CVS the WARP
spec with the section about local network (required for UPnP use
cases) at:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access-upnp/
This draft does not meet my expectations
Below is the draft agenda for the December 3 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via
public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting).
Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting:
Hi All,
On Nov 30, 2009, at 11:20 AM, ext Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
Hi Nikunj,
@2009-11-26 02:00 -0800:
Here's my suggestion:
1. WebDatabase be renamed to WebSQLDatabase
2. WebSimpleDB be renamed to ISAM Database Level 1
Thanks for all of the good feedback. The new title of the
On Dec 1, 2009, at 4:22 PM, ext Marcin Hanclik wrote:
Since the PAG has started with the earlier draft of WARP and
relation to PAG was an argument for LC#2, we assume that the group
still has time to accommodate the LC#1 comments in the present
version of the specification without the
A few weeks ago, WebApps' was asked to rationalize and explain how
the [various Database-related] APIs fit together.
Thanks to some good work by Nikunj, we now have a wiki for this purpose:
[[
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Database
The purpose of this document is to provide a short
with a comment end date of Jan 13 2010 [on Arthur Barstow - due
2009-12-10].
WARP spec: post-LC#1 comment handling
AB: during the last call we discussed how to handle post LC#1
features ( [22]http://www.w3.org/2009/11/19-wam-minutes.html#item06
). Since then, Marcin created an input
On Dec 3, 2009, at 9:23 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
As predicted last week [1], I have replied to the outstanding
issues that
had been raised on the following specs, and thus am ready to
suggest that
we take these specs to LC to get wider review:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
Below are some comments from Yael re the View Modes Interface spec:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vm/vm-interfaces.src.html
-Art Barstow
= Section 3.1:
Interface Media:
1. Interface Media is also defined in CSSOM (4.1), and the definition
is not consistent. I think it should be
Mark, Tyler,
On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:33 PM, ext Tyler Close wrote:
I made some minor edits and formatting improvements to the document
sent out on Friday. The new version is attached. If you read the prior
version, there's no need to review the new one. If you're just getting
started, use the
On Dec 4, 2009, at 7:19 AM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote:
If we already have multiple implementations of a spec, I think the
spirit of the Recommendation track process suggests a shorter LC
period
(say 2 months given the time of the year
Mark, Tyler,
*IF* this proposal was a WG document, its Status of the Document
section would include a patent disclosure requirement like the one in
CORS:
[[
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-access-20090804/
An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the
individual
On Dec 7, 2009, at 6:29 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Anyway, my point was that even if I did have time to edit the
spec, it
would be a bad idea to accelerate the process. Reviewing a
On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:44 AM, ext Mark S. Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Dan Connolly conno...@w3.org wrote:
Would you two (and anyone else that contributed to the UniMess
proposal)
please make a patent disclosure for your proposal?
-Art Barstow
Are you asking them to say we
201 - 300 of 1565 matches
Mail list logo
