> Norman Dunbar
> Database/Unix administrator
> Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tel: 0113 289 6265
> Fax: 0113 289 3146
> URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
> ---------
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: F
At 08:01 AM 7/10/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>On 9 Jul 2002, at 12:31, Timothy Swenson wrote:
>
> >
> > A
> > Actually, I would probably work better if Jochen took the SMSQ/E
> > source code, added the commercial programs to the CD and sold it.
>(...)
>No, he certainly can't sell the source code!
>He
> Pity...
> Who is the copyright owner for eglish versions? Can he be
> approached?
Don't know exactly what the situation is, will speak to Tony about it
...
but don't want to bother him now 'cause I am still waiting for
other stuff he was going to send to me.
> > Even selling just JMON on is o
On 10 Jul 2002, at 10:22, Jochen Merz wrote:
> > And anyway, can't you sell a German Qmon with an english
> > manual?
> Uh, it's not the binary version which makes the difference, it's the
> manual :-(
Pity...
Who is the copyright owner for eglish versions? Can he be
approached?
> Even selli
Hi Wolfgang,
> See my other email. It is possible., but you would be distributing
> an unofficial version.
Exactly.
> > I am so glad that QMAKE is not essential for assembling SMSQ/E's
> > sources. It sure helps a lot to have it, makes it fast and convenient,
> > and you may have to re-write t
On 10 Jul 2002, at 0:18, Jochen Merz wrote:
>
> Dear Derek, Tim, Dave, Rich,
>
> a combined reply to the four mails from you.
>
> I like the idea of putting a bundle together like you suggested,
> but
>
> - in no way I'd bundle it with the SMSQ/E sources (the license).
See my other email. I
On 9 Jul 2002, at 15:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Or, better still, Wolfgang could offer three versions of the source
> code CD...
Sorry to disappoint you guys, but I don't intend to become a
software (re)seller...
I'd have to handle payments to Jochen, Quanta etc (nd I don't
even know
On 9 Jul 2002, at 12:31, Timothy Swenson wrote:
>
> A
> Actually, I would probably work better if Jochen took the SMSQ/E
> source code, added the commercial programs to the CD and sold it.
(...)
No, he certainly can't sell the source code!
He is, however, entitled to distribute it for free...
Dear Derek, Tim, Dave, Rich,
a combined reply to the four mails from you.
I like the idea of putting a bundle together like you suggested,
but
- in no way I'd bundle it with the SMSQ/E sources (the license).
- what sort of accusations would Wolfgang or myself would have
to look forward to aft
At 03:17 PM 7/9/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Or, better still, Wolfgang could offer three versions of the source code
>CD...
Actually, I would probably work better if Jochen took the SMSQ/E source
code, added the commercial programs to the CD and sold it. This way the
Registrar (Wolfgang) does n
In a message dated 09/07/02 18:27:00 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Obviously, when talking about commercial products, especially where Jochen
has kindly lowered the price for a period to allow SMSQ tinkerers to get
in at a lower level, I think all is right with the World.
Jochen,
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Derek Stewart wrote:
> No that is not waht I meant, people who want to compile SMSQ/E and have not
> got QMAC, QLINK and QMAKE will have to buy them.
Obviously, when talking about commercial products, especially where Jochen
has kindly lowered the price for a period to all
Well I wish I never entered this message
On Tuesday 09 July 2002 9:39 am, you wrote:
> This is very funny. Yes, let's have EVERYTHING for free
>
No that is not waht I meant, people who want to compile SMSQ/E and have not
got QMAC, QLINK and QMAKE will have to buy them.
I did not s
It puzzled me for a bit until I discovered it was a problem with the
unzip program. It assumes the
file names in the zip do not include the device name, which in this case
they did. The real limit is 36
characters + the device name = 40. With a bit of messing around I got
the lot on the .WIN f
On 9 Jul 2002, at 7:52, Derek Stewart wrote:
>
> The styleguide looks very good, but all the programs specified to
> compile the SMSQ/E source code are commerical.
Indeed they are.
> QMAC and QLINK maybe only available through QuantA
> QMAKE is available through Jochen Merz Software
You can a
On 9 Jul 2002, at 2:07, Fabrizio Diversi wrote:
> A general question for all the other people, what is
> happening outside here with the SMSQE sources ?
> - who receive the cd ? (hoping this is not covered by
> a specific clause of personal confidentiality)
I'm sorry, I don't feel free to divul
On 9 Jul 2002, at 10:39, Jochen Merz wrote:
> This is very funny. Yes, let's have EVERYTHING for free
Actually, I fail to see what this whole debate is about.
Who ever said that the tools necessary to compile whatever,
including the source codes, would be free for anybody?
Tony graciou
On 9 Jul 2002, at 10:43, Norman Dunbar wrote:
>
> Once I get a compilation done, I can check the original 'win1_' and
> the 'dev8_' versions for similarity (or complete lack) and if ok, send
> Wolfgang what I have.
And I will be very grateful for it!
> Once I get to that stage, I'll be havin
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
From: Jochen Merz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] SMSQ Source styleguide
> I'm a wee bit puzzled as to how Tony managed to zip up the sources as many
> of the filenames were longer than the allowed 36 characters - especially as
> he had that extra 'U$$' directory name present. Anyone know what he develops
> on ?
SMSQ/E, of course :-
> PS. QMAKE - enquiry 1, sale
-
-Original Message-
From: Fabrizio Diversi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] SMSQ Source styleguide
Just sent mine.
So, update on QMake: inquiry 1 - sale 1
A general question fo
Just sent mine.
So, update on QMake: inquiry 1 - sale 1
A general question for all the other people, what is
happening outside here with the SMSQE sources ?
- who receive the cd ? (hoping this is not covered by
a specific clause of personal confidentiality)
- apart me and Norman someone else is
Norman Dunbar wrote:
>
> Oh yes you have !!
> I sent one myself this very morning - via your web site.
... you're right - NOW - but this goes to a different email account -
so after replying here I found your message and you have a reply in
your box now :-))
So, update on QMake: inquiry 1 - sa
-
-Original Message-
From: Jochen Merz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] SMSQ Source styleguide
>> And - interesting, I have not had a single inquiry about a
>>
> The styleguide looks very good, but all the programs specified to compile the
> SMSQ/E source code are commerical.
>
> QMAC and QLINK maybe only available through QuantA
> QMAKE is available through Jochen Merz Software
>
> Is it your intension to make all these commerical programs available
On Tuesday 09 July 2002 6:39 am, you wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> enclosed is the styleguide.
>
> Wolfgang
> The following section of this message contains a file attachment
> prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
> If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant
Hi all,
enclosed is the styleguide.
Wolfgang
The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from wit
27 matches
Mail list logo
