On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:18:29PM +1300, Chris K. Young wrote:
> Quoted from Adam McKenna [15 Nov 2000]:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 01:14:15PM +1300, Chris K. Young wrote:
> > > ``The [licence] must
> > > explicitly permit distribution of softwar
Dear all,
I'd upgraded my daemontools on qmail from version 0.53 to 0.7.
The file size for both /var/qmail/control/locals and rcpthosts exceeds
1M (this incl. around 65000 cobrands).
However using the new daemontool with svscan somehow prevent qmail from
running
with big locals and rcpthosts, i h
Can you help me with use qmail analog ??? I have installed qmailanalog and
have log file without time stamps...
I think that i use incorrect syntaxes...
Daniel POGAČ
Tech. Support
TatraSoft Group s.r.o
Sibírska 4
83102 Bratislava
tel: +421-7-55574033
fax: +421-7-55566385
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
qmail Digest 15 Nov 2000 11:00:00 - Issue 1184
Topics (messages 52138 through 52229):
Re: MX routing question
52138 by: Paul Farber
HELP!
52139 by: Casey Allen Shobe
Fresh Installation
52140 by: Mark Anderson
52141 by: James Raftery
reg. qmail-qmqpd and qm
Thank you first.
I am writing a linux application trying to send email to a qmail server. I
am able to send a very small sized data across successfully and receive in
in a mailbox ok, but when the data size becomes larger, it seems that the
email vanished in the air!
Any idea? Below is the code
Daniel POGAC wrote:
> Can you help me with use qmail analog ??? I have installed qmailanalog and
> have log file without time stamps...
>
> I think that i use incorrect syntaxes...
I'm using the following very simple Script for general Mail Statistics:
root@foxdev1:/usr/local/samba/lib> cat /us
My server mail.foo.com receives all email for the foo.com domain.
Most messages are to be delivered locally on this server.
But, messages sent to certain addresses, for example "[EMAIL PROTECTED]",
need to be forwarded to another server, xxx.foo.com. In addition, the
envelope address needs to be
Hi,
My .qmail-default have the line: | /var/qmail/bin/fastforward -d
/etc/aliases.cdb. The /etc/aliases have the line: MAILER-DAEMON:admin . I'm
receiving a lot of emails from someone trying to spam me but, the accounts
that the spammer is trying to spam doesn't exists so, the qmail send
I installed Qmailadmin and created a virtual domain and some users
for this domain so, I have emails like : [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] , ok
it's perfect but, I would like to know how can I get the emails sent to this
users(xxx,yyy) if they aren't users from the system(they are
I have set up Qmail and (as a temp messure) allowed open relaying so my
users
can send through the server. You can send mail to a user on the machine but
it
seems to go into nothingness. Never being delivered, never being bouced.
Nothing.
I don't even know where to start.
Mark Anderson
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:18:46PM -, Mark Anderson wrote:
> I don't even know where to start.
Start by looking to your logs.
james
Hello
I'm using ezmlm.
I have a list of people in a list.
I use ezmlm-send to send the message in the following way
# ezmlm-send ~/list < "mail.file"
I've checked the queue and the emails of the users that the message is
suposed to go are ok.
But after the email is sent by qmail the email t
Hello
I am still new to qmail,
I was wondering if it is possible to create maildir folder automatically as
a mails are recieved ,probably by calling maildirmake during delivery ?
thanx in advance
Suresh
Mithi.com Pvt. Ltd.
--
Send and receive mail in Indi
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I can't figure out how to do this, since it appears that qmail's
> forwarding mechanism appears to be based on transformations of the
> envelope address.
No, qmail does not transform the envelope address. Create a
~user/.qmail (or ~alias/.qmail-use
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 09:11:32PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > Mr. Schneier is respected for his expertise and cryptography, and just
> > because he states that head money for bugs is no good, does not make him
> > an M S type weenie.
>
> You're r
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For what its worth, I was only originally expression an opinion on the
> few paragraphs that Mate posted, from some book that I had never heard
> of, by a "B. Schneier" [sic] I didn't know who he was talking about at
> first, and I was reacting to gettin
Hi,
I'm just setting up mailuser for using qmail. The defaultdeliverymethod
is Maildir. What is the best right for the maildirectories to be sure
that mails can be written in the users Maildir and no other unixuser can
make something else with mails that are not for him.
Actualy I have given th
Hi,
I'm just setting up mailuser for using qmail. The defaultdeliverymethod
is Maildir. What is the best right for the maildirectories to be sure
that mails can be written in the users Maildir and no other unixuser can
make something else with mails that are not for him.
Actualy I have given th
hi,
1. I am able to send & receive mails, but i need to start qmail manually
even though i have written the init scripts.
This is the error i get in the nohup.out which is created when starting
qmail file : nonup env - PATH="$PATH" svscan &
./run: Can't reopen pipe to command substitution (fd
Is it possible to write a filter for maildrop such that it automatically
does a maildirmake and creates a maildir ,may it can read the message
,extract the user name and create a maildir for the same?I am sure this will
make it more scalable
Suresh
Mithi.com Pvt. Ltd.
---
Hello
any knows what is automaildirmake
Suresh
Mithi.com Pvt. Ltd.
--
Send and receive mail in Indian languages
Register free at http://www.mailjol.com
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm just setting up mailuser for using qmail. The
> defaultdeliverymethod is Maildir. What is the best right for the
> maildirectories to be sure that mails can be written in the users
> Maildir and no other unixuser can make something else with mai
Hi,
While thinking this over, I became confused so I was
wondering if someone could shed some light on adding
an outgoing-only qmail server to a network/domain.
Any docs, references, etc, for pointers are very much
appreciated.
What I would like to do is this:
host1 -> primary MX for incomin
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 03:11:43PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> > Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Not to mention that the whole point of freeware and open source
> > > software in general is to give everyone the ability to audit the
> > > soft
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 03:35:35PM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > Whilst an audit is a good idea, I don't see how a competition and
> > > time in the field can actual make matters worse.
> >
> > It can make people think a pro
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:51:43PM -, Pedro Pires wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm using ezmlm.
Good. Then try the list for ezmlm: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have a list of people in a list.
>
> I use ezmlm-send to send the message in the following way
>
> # ezmlm-send ~/list < "mail.file"
>
> I've
> Just because it's ``often'' done doesn't mean it's correct. To me, and
> possibly others, open source is used to describe software that uses a
> licence conforming to the Open Source Definition.
>
I like: "3 a: completely free from concealment : exposed to general view or
knowledge b : exposed
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:18:29PM +1300, Chris K. Young wrote:
> > I say that dist.html should be considered authoritative. There are
> > references in the qmail and djbdns documentation that contain the
> > URL to their respective pages.
>
> That's wha
Charles Cazabon wrote:
> However, as far as qmail goes: all the crackers in the world have had access
> to the qmail source code and design documentation for years, and none have
> yet found an exploitable security hole. You could consider that a fairly
> thorough audit-by-fire.
There is no pro
Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 09:11:32PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>> Mr. Schneier is respected for his expertise and cryptography, and just
>> because he states that head money for bugs is no good, does not make him
>> an M S type weenie.
>
>
> You're right, Bruce Schein
> Eric Yu:
> The file size for both /var/qmail/control/locals and rcpthosts exceeds
> 1M (this incl. around 65000 cobrands).
in this case you should allocate as much space in the ./run- files.
the routines activated usually return some result or -1 to indicate
failure. so you should establish t
Paul Jarc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 15 November 2000 at 11:07:43 -0500
> Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:18:29PM +1300, Chris K. Young wrote:
> > > I say that dist.html should be considered authoritative. There are
> > > references in the qmail and d
Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 15 November 2000 at 00:07:35 -0600
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:13:19PM -0500, Bennett Todd wrote:
> > efforts is on monitoring and risk management. With that as a given,
> > I expect he runs sendmail and BIND; things like qmail and djbdns are
> > for
"Expert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My .qmail-default have the line: | /var/qmail/bin/fastforward -d
>/etc/aliases.cdb. The /etc/aliases have the line: MAILER-DAEMON: admin . I'm
>receiving a lot of emails from someone trying to spam me but, the accounts
>that the spamer is trying to spa
wolfgang zeikat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>how can i make qmail accept mails for
>user@[123.123.123.123] when the machine 123.123.123.123 forwards all mails
>to our qmail server?
Put 123.123.123.123 in control/locals and control/rcpthosts.
-Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'd upgraded my daemontools on qmail from version 0.53 to 0.7.
>The file size for both /var/qmail/control/locals and rcpthosts exceeds
>1M (this incl. around 65000 cobrands).
>However using the new daemontool with svscan somehow prevent qmail from
>running
>with big loca
"Kiran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>1. I am able to send & receive mails, but i need to start qmail manually
>even though i have written the init scripts.
> This is the error i get in the nohup.out which is created when starting
>qmail file : nonup env - PATH="$PATH" svscan &
>
>./run: Can't re
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 11:07:43AM -0500, Paul Jarc wrote:
> Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:18:29PM +1300, Chris K. Young wrote:
> > > I say that dist.html should be considered authoritative. There are
> > > references in the qmail and djbdns documentation
On 16 Nov 2000 00:16:19 +1100, Brett Randall wrote:
> No, qmail does not transform the envelope address. Create a
> ~user/.qmail (or ~alias/.qmail-user) with:
>
> | forward "$LOCAL"@otherhost.foo.com
>
> As long as the other host received mail for otherhost.foo.com, all
> will be fine (I know,
Brett Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is the maildir in their home folder? Then that is all that
>matters.
Nope. The mode on the home directory matters, too.
>Set the numbers to whatever you like (777 if you really want
>to). Since the parent folder ($HOME) is readable only by the owner (if
"James T. Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What I would like to do is this:
> host1 -> primary MX for incoming and outgoing
> host2 -> outgoing only
>
>host1 will be used for "regular" email traffic, with
>legit user accounts, while host2 will be mainly used
>for pumping out big loads of outg
"suresh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>any knows what is automaildirmake
No, but but I'm sure if you keep asking about it, someone will.
-Dave
"David Dyer-Bennet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dan is probably right that no special permissions are needed to make
>normal uses of his code (which is what he says on his web pages), but
>if the corporate lawyer isn't in agreement with him, he's going to say
>"no". That's a corporate lawyer's j
I am using qmail-scanner, and it has been effectively blocking this
virus, although I'm tired of recieving the notifications about it (at
least 2-5 daily), yet I don't want to disable the mail me feature just
for this one virus. Aside from setting up a filter in my MUA to delete
these, I would pr
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think "select few" as you have used it needs clarification -- even if only
>one half of one percent of all advanced C programmers are part of the "select
>few", that's still hundreds or thousands of people, and many of those people
>are part of the open
Bennett Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>And a case could be made that the charming and personable way qmail
>has been represented in various public fora makes this audit-by-fire
>even better: at this point, there are enough people around the world
>who hate djb's guts and would never touch anyth
Dave Sill wrote:
> Put 123.123.123.123 in control/locals and control/rcpthosts.
>
> -Dave
ACK! i had mistyped the IP in both files, thanks for making me check
once more :)
wolfgang
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 02:16:38PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 09:11:32PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > > Mr. Schneier is respected for his expertise and cryptography, and just
> > > because he states that head money f
Ryan Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> > Indeed, it would be interesting what kind of testing he is running on
> > qmail, say (he says there are over 100 tests), and how he is trying to
> > make sure his software is secure.
>
> If you want to see som
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 01:05:26PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> "suresh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >any knows what is automaildirmake
>
> No, but but I'm sure if you keep asking about it, someone will.
It's a feature of qmail-ldap. I haven't seen it anywhere else.
RC
--
+--
Bennett Todd wrote:
> 2000-11-14-16:37:06 Lipscomb, Al:
>> "Free Software" as promoted by the Free Software Foundation (FSF)
>> is a different thing. I belive that the DJB software is Open
>> Source, but not free.
>
> Unlike Open Source, the phrase "free software" strongly predates the
> Free So
* Felix von Leitner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> The OpenBSD guys lost their credibility as software security authority
> when they decided to include sendmail as standard MTA.
Well, we all know why they cannot include qmail. :-/
> Theo is rumored to have said something like "There we
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 01:21:40PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I think "select few" as you have used it needs clarification -- even if only
> >one half of one percent of all advanced C programmers are part of the "select
> >few", that's still hundreds or
I need to resend all the incoming mail for an account to all the
receipents in the header having a specific domain. For instance
if I have the following in the header:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to resend mail to only addresses for dom.com, in this
ca
Hi Dave,
Dave Sill wrote:
> OK, so where are you stuck?
oops, sorry ;)
I must have sent out the message in the middle of my racing
thoughts.
I was wondering whether to include host2 also as an MX in the
dns records although host1 is the only MX handling incoming and
part of outgoing (none fro
Hi-
I have a qmail server hosting several virtual domains, and all mail
delivered to recipients in the virtual domains have a Delivered-To
header line indicating the "main" domain name of the server.
I want to delete this line, and I understand that the -d option to
preline is the way to do t
On 15 Nov 2000, Paul Jarc wrote:
> > If you want to see some of the tests he does, check out rts.tests that
> > comes in the djbdns distribution.
>
> That sort of thing has its place, but it's not really related to
> auditing at all. Mostly, it's good for detecting compilation
> problems.
>
S
Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 15 November 2000 at 13:09:25 -0500
> "David Dyer-Bennet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Dan is probably right that no special permissions are needed to make
> >normal uses of his code (which is what he says on his web pages), but
> >if the corporate l
Adam McKenna writes:
> By the way, why are the cr.yp.to lists so slow lately?
UIC is paying its ISP for a measly 14Mbps. UIC has been hitting this
limit more and more frequently since the beginning of September. The
packet-loss rate averages over 2% now, even if you don't count the
recent 30-hour
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 01:21:40PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
>>
>> An audit by some random "security
>> firm" might not mean anything, but an audit by a recognized authority
>> would.
>
>It might. It also might not, because even the best auditors could miss
Shakaib Sayyid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I need to resend all the incoming mail for an account to all the
>receipents in the header having a specific domain. For instance
>if I have the following in the header:
>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>I want to rese
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When, exactly, did I say he was a bad person? You are putting words in my
> mouth.
I extracted that from the term "M$-weenie".
> And I responded in context. Whether or not you or Mr. Scheiier like it,
> Microsoft has been using almost this exact argu
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 01:14 16.11.00 +1100, you wrote:
>>Then that is all that matters. Set the numbers to whatever you like
>>(777 if you really want to).
>
> with 777 you enable all, that's not I wont. I want the min, but mail
> must function.
I'm not sure you act
"James T. Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I was wondering whether to include host2 also as an MX in the
>dns records although host1 is the only MX handling incoming and
>part of outgoing (none from host2).
No, only SMTP servers should be listed in MX's.
>If I'm correct, I don't need an MX en
Hi,
Can anyone explain to me why when I compile qmail-1.03 with pgsql-0.14 patch
and run qmail-start I get a pid returned, but when I check the process list
it is not there? In order to call qmail-start, I'm calling the rc script the
comes supplied. This method worked well under mysql, but I just
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 10:01:18PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Of course, the presentation of your opinion, calling somebody you don't
> know names, left room for desires.
I said "sounds like". And in the context in which his opinion was presented,
it sounds a lot like MS's.
--Adam
--
Ada
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:19:22PM +, Tristan Graham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to implement forwarding of the form user@somedomain ->
> user@someotherdomain. i.e. the original user at the original domain is
> propagated to the forwarded domain. Are there any mystical variables that
> can be
Mate Wierdl wrote:
[included qmail list again]
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:29:14AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > I, as the author of the qmail-ldap patch, have looked deeply into the
> > guts of qmail and found it to be secure. If one actually reads the
> > source and see's the way Dan writ
I have a user that has requested his mail be forwarded to a new address.
This is fine, but is there a way to reprocess his allrready delivered
mail in $HOME/Maildir so that is sent on to the new forward address?
-Colin
What's the maximum number of virtual domains on one qmail-server and
administrated with qmailadmin??
greetings
Marco Leeflang
Leeflang-IT
Netherlands
I use qmailadmin-0.39 and vpopmail-4.9.6
If you push the add button in add pop account with empty fields i get 2
situations.
First after push the add button vpasswd for that domain is cleared, 0
bytes cdb files still ok.
Second a entry in vpasswd is add with no popaccount and username
informat
Quoting Peter Cavender ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi-
>
> I have a qmail server hosting several virtual domains, and all mail
> delivered to recipients in the virtual domains have a Delivered-To
> header line indicating the "main" domain name of the server.
Fascinating. Is that a government secre
Can anyone explain me how I leave this list?
Please, somebody tell me...
Thanks
At 05:36 PM 11/15/2000, you wrote:
>Can anyone explain me how I leave this list? Please, somebody tell me...
>
>Thanks
you can unsub anytime you like, but you can never leave
it's just like subscribing, only backwards...
hello,
perhaps this is another silly question, but I'm trying to deliver mail
locally. So if my server's domain is domain.com, and I try to send
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from my own local account (ie:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]), qmail complaints that in the
MX list for domain.com, t
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 05:42:31PM -0800, Oliver Menzel wrote:
> hello,
> perhaps this is another silly question, but I'm trying to deliver mail
> locally. So if my server's domain is domain.com, and I try to send
> mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from my own local account (ie:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [
Just got a call from an angry MSN user.
http://www.internetnews.com/isp-news/article/0,,8_512791,00.html
jon
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Jon Rust wrote:
> Just got a call from an angry MSN user.
> http://www.internetnews.com/isp-news/article/0,,8_512791,00.html
> jon
It's too bad that companies can't set up two systems... one for people
who don't want to receive this spam crap and one for customers who lack
OK. I've searched through some of the archives for a solution to this.
However I could not find an answer. We use qmail 1.03 with vpopmail 4.9.4
and MySQL 3.22.32. After adding a new domain we have started receiving some
duplicate messages on only that domain. I've yet to see it happen on any
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:41:13AM +1100, Colin Humphreys wrote:
> I have a user that has requested his mail be forwarded to a new address.
>
> This is fine, but is there a way to reprocess his allrready delivered
> mail in $HOME/Maildir so that is sent on to the new forward address?
We frequent
Hi Dave,
I just wanted to thank you for giving me clarity (which also
set off a number of chain-reactions in my head :).
Best regards,
jamie
#-#-#-#-#-#-#-#
-- If somebody can help create a search engine for my room,
I will call them
I have strange taimouts --
If clients (or other servers) d't use my
SMTP server during 10 (or more) minuts
appear timaut about 1 min.
After this timeout all working OK - without
some timeout till next pause from work SMTP server...
I use tcpserver with -R -H options and Slackware linux...
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 06:58:30PM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> It's too bad that companies can't set up two systems... one for people
> who don't want to receive this spam crap and one for customers who lack
> clue.
As well as us who actually want to collect spam (for research and
investigati
83 matches
Mail list logo
