Security User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> By default I noticed that qmail waits 7 days before sending an error message
> back to a user indicating that a message was undeliverable in the case where
> a user miskeys the domain portion of the e-mail address to a domain with a
> non-existant MX r
Steve Wozniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Please don't feed the troll.
Charles
--
---
Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
> "Jeff" == Jeff Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Granted, a lot of the emails to this list could be handled if the person
> would just read the FAQ. But the simple truth is, it's not going to
> happen. Human nature is against you here.
Semi-true. When I first started on this group, I
Greg, I do have resolv.h in /usr/include
and I still get the same errors.
I also tried copying it from another
machine, and still nothing. Any other
ideas, anyone?
Thank you in advance - Proc
_
Free email with personality! Over 200 domains!
http:
I'm a little Troll, I'm looking for some servers to exploit. I look through this list
to find the vulnerable qmail servers; you know, newbies that give out tooo much info
because the list regulars like Frank Tegtmeyer beat up on newbies and pressure them to
give out way too much info.
Any of y
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 06:34:53PM -0400, McHugh, Sean allegedly wrote:
> However, after thinking about it. I send and recieve over 75000 messages a
> day.
> I do not want to use TLS indiscriminately for every SMTP host. I have only
> a few places to send to where mail _needs_ to be encrypted. s
I normally don't participate in such discussions, but...
Jeff Palmer wrote:
>Granted, a lot of the emails to this list could be handled if the person
>would just read the FAQ. But the simple truth is... [h]uman nature is not
> digging through tons of documentation to find a
>'simple' answer.
FA
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 11:00:08AM -0400, Roger Merchberger wrote:
[snip]
> >perl -ne 'chomp(); print "$_:allow,RBLSMTPD=/-yuck fou./\n";'
>
> ;-)
>
> I'd *love* to use that as my default text, but methinks I'll have to be a
> bit more dip
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 04:14:16PM -0500, Proc Meminfo wrote:
> Hey, I am receiving the following errors while doing 'make setup check':
>
> dns.o: In function 'resolve':
> dns.o(.text+0xf8): undefined reference to '__dn_expand'
> dns.o: In function 'findname':
> dns.o(.text+0x1bc): undefined ref
However, after thinking about it. I send and recieve over 75000 messages a
day.
I do not want to use TLS indiscriminately for every SMTP host. I have only
a few places to send to where mail _needs_ to be encrypted. so how do
_selectively_ tell qmail to use
tls for certain hosts and not others ?
Title: Reducing Time-Out for Unresolved Hosts
I've been lurking for about a week now - and I have a fairly simple question, that maybe someone can help me with.
By default I noticed that qmail waits 7 days before sending an error message back to a user indicating that a message was undeliver
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 05:17:46PM -0400, Rudy Zung wrote:
> [Don't remember if I've already posted this; sorry if it's a repeat.]
>
> Trying to run qmail with Maildir on a Slackware with AFS. The AFS is
> installed and runs properly. Users' home volumes and Maildir are on AFS.
> Qmail is genera
[Don't remember if I've already posted this; sorry if it's a repeat.]
Trying to run qmail with Maildir on a Slackware with AFS. The AFS is
installed and runs properly. Users' home volumes and Maildir are on AFS.
Qmail is generating temporary delivery errors; the mail never gets delivered.
I've
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 10:34:27AM -0500, Virginia Chism wrote:
> I received a failure notice concerning an email I did not send. I am
> attempting to track down how this happened and have hit a wall. When I do
> 'tail -f /var/log/maillog' I get current activity. If I do 'more
> /var/log/maillo
At 16:20 01.08.2001 -0500, Scott Zielsdorf wrote:
>LOL! I love abuse!
i not
>I gave myself root, my box. I'm a SCO guy or was. First linux I've ever
>logged into. Three days ago. Not by choice. So...
if it is your box, why did you install an OS you don't like ?
>I don't care if XINET sucks - w
LOL! I love abuse!
I gave myself root, my box. I'm a SCO guy or was. First linux I've ever
logged into. Three days ago. Not by choice. So...
I don't care if XINET sucks - which from what I read else where that is
debatable (XINET replaces INET) - and I don't care that Robin lifted his leg
and pis
Hey, I am receiving the following errors while doing 'make setup check':
dns.o: In function 'resolve':
dns.o(.text+0xf8): undefined reference to '__dn_expand'
dns.o: In function 'findname':
dns.o(.text+0x1bc): undefined reference to '__dn_expand'
dns.o(.text+0x24c): undefined reference to '__dn_e
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 03:58:01PM -0500, Scott Zielsdorf wrote:
> I am STUPID.
> xinetd.d/smtp config file:
> I rebooted and now selective relaying is working like a champ.
> Senior Technical Support Consultant
Taking this four lines together, the first line makes a lot of
sense... Who on earth
At 15:58 01.08.2001 -0500, Scott Zielsdorf wrote:
>I am STUPID.
nope. inetd / xinetd is stupid
>I did not know and consequently did not mention that my qmail
>was running on my Redhat 7 running xinetd and NOT inetd.
inetd sucks
> xinetd is, as far
>as I can find, not covered in the LWQ or 1.0
All,
I am STUPID. I did not know and consequently did not mention that my qmail
was running on my Redhat 7 running xinetd and NOT inetd. xinetd is, as far
as I can find, not covered in the LWQ or 1.03 Install procedure. I installed
tcpserver as LWQ said I should but the xinetd.d/smtp config file
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 04:10:13PM -0400, Jeff Palmer wrote:
>
> Can anyone say 'anger management course'?
Anger mangama... Angre mgnma
Nope.
> Good lord man,
Call me Robin.
> Lighten up. You were a newbie at some point, as was EVERYONE else.
> Nobody was born an SMTP god. Nor a unix g
Jeff,
You are wasting your time. Robin is just gonna hit you with
his BS now... Don't take me wrong, I AGREE with YOU. But
I went down that road with Robin and it didn't do any good.
And it never will. I don't think he had a mother and it's
obvious his father beat him regularly... h
I've hit an odd problem with qmail-remote.
With one of our ISP's DNS servers set as primary, qmail-remote will hang
indefinitely on some addresses. The DNS server in question responds fine
to dig queries.
Example:
First DNS server in resolv.conf is 205.152.0.20
Run the following command: (t
Can anyone say 'anger management course'?
Good lord man,
You don't have to get so disrespectful and nasty just because someone does
not read,sleep,eat, and breathe a particular RFC or protocal.
Lighten up. You were a newbie at some point, as was EVERYONE else.
Nobody was born an SMTP god. No
On Wednesday, August 01, 2001 20:19, Tom Beer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> > in a bounce message i got this
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3)
>
to clarify
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3)
I'm not going to try again; this
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 04:15:55PM -0300, Daniel Abad wrote:
> Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Daniel Abad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Look, dude, I reformatted your message to give it a minimum amount of
meaning. Do not ever *think* about hitting reply before you've fully
read and
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 04:15:55PM -0300, Daniel Abad wrote:
> Ok, I telnet at 25 and compose a message, with mail from: , rcpt to: anda
> data (.) .
>
> When I received this from my Outlook or Webmail, the message is empty! Only
> the time appears!
>
> Tks.
>
> Daniel
Please learn t
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 04:15:55PM -0300, Daniel Abad wrote:
> Ok, I telnet at 25 and compose a message, with mail from: , rcpt to: anda
> data (.) .
> When I received this from my Outlook or Webmail, the message is empty! Only
> the time appears!
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt
ht
Ok, I telnet at 25 and compose a message, with mail from: , rcpt to: anda
data (.) .
When I received this from my Outlook or Webmail, the message is empty! Only
the time appears!
Tks.
Daniel
-Mensagem original-
De: Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada em: Quarta
Scott Zielsdorf writes:
> Thanks Philipp and Charles for the help on this.
>
> Once I set the TCPREMOTEIP variable I did see the rule which now leads me to
> the discovery that my Windows workstations - which are DHCP clients - do not
> have entries in my DNS. So when qmail does the reverse loo
At 12:00 01.08.2001 -0500, Scott Zielsdorf wrote:
>At 11:37 01.08.2001 -0500, Lukas Beeler wrote:
> > >So when qmail does the reverse look up, it can't
> > >resolve the IP.
> >
> > yes, but where's the problem ?
> >
>
>The problem is RELAYCLIENT doesn't get set and therefore the relaying rules
>in
Hi,
in a bounce message i got this
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3)
Both sending and receiving mail server use the qmail rpm's from bruce.
so the big-dns patch is applied.
The domain quint.be is under my control.
I really don't understand it because in the dns i ne
At 11:37 01.08.2001 -0500, Lukas Beeler wrote:
> At 11:14 01.08.2001 -0500, Scott Zielsdorf wrote:
> >Once I set the TCPREMOTEIP variable I did see the rule which now
> leads me to
> >the discovery that my Windows workstations - which are DHCP
> clients - do not
> >have entries in my DNS.
>
> so
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 11:14:43AM -0500, Scott Zielsdorf wrote:
> Thanks Philipp and Charles for the help on this.
>
> Once I set the TCPREMOTEIP variable I did see the rule which now leads me to
> the discovery that my Windows workstations - which are DHCP clients - do not
> have entries in my
Scott Zielsdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Once I set the TCPREMOTEIP variable I did see the rule which now leads me to
> the discovery that my Windows workstations - which are DHCP clients - do not
> have entries in my DNS. So when qmail does the reverse look up, it can't
> resolve the IP.
At 11:14 01.08.2001 -0500, Scott Zielsdorf wrote:
>Once I set the TCPREMOTEIP variable I did see the rule which now leads me to
>the discovery that my Windows workstations - which are DHCP clients - do not
>have entries in my DNS.
so far, so good. but tell me, what does the TCPREMOTEIP Variable h
Hi lkirchhoff,
> i've just installed the ezmlm 0.53 with idx 0.4 and
> tried to run ezmlm-web.cgi. The problem is that the
> lists are always created in the /tmp dir. I tried to
> set up the /var/qmail/alias dir in the ezmlmwebrc,
> but then i had an error with qmail [homedir is
>
Thanks Philipp and Charles for the help on this.
Once I set the TCPREMOTEIP variable I did see the rule which now leads me to
the discovery that my Windows workstations - which are DHCP clients - do not
have entries in my DNS. So when qmail does the reverse look up, it can't
resolve the IP.
Short
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 10:34:27AM -0500, Virginia Chism wrote:
> I received a failure notice concerning an email I did not send. I am
> attempting to track down how this happened and have hit a wall. When I do
> 'tail -f /var/log/maillog' I get current activity. If I do 'more
> /var/log/maillo
I received a failure notice concerning an email I did not send. I am
attempting to track down how this happened and have hit a wall. When I do
'tail -f /var/log/maillog' I get current activity. If I do 'more
/var/log/maillog' it goes all the way back to day one and I don't have time
to slog thr
Scott Zielsdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I did notice in my search of the Web that people were reporting detailed
> output from running tcprulescheck /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb.
> Here's the contents of my tcp.smtp file (cut and pasted):
>
> 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
> 192.168.10.:allow,RELAYCLIENT
Roger Merchberger writes:
> Rumor has it that Russell Nelson may have mentioned these words:
> >Yup. Anybody who uses an email client that they didn't write
> >themselves (in assembly language) is just a poseur.
>
> Altho I've never really stopped programming in assembly, I do *very* little
Hi Scott,
you have to set and probably export (someone correct me if i am wrong here)
$TCPREMOTEIP before invoking tcprules check. then, tcprulescheck will tell
you what will happen to a connection from the ip in $TCPREMOTEIP.
for example if your tcp.smtp file is:
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
19
Greetings All,
I have reinstalled qmail EXACTLY via the documentation in LWQ EXCEPT for
installation of the daemontools. I am using daemontools 0.76 and I used the
referenced Web page in the README to install. I have tried all manner of run
files supplied by members of the list - and thank you Ro
Hi,
i've just installed the ezmlm 0.53 with idx 0.4 and
tried to run ezmlm-web.cgi. The problem is that the
lists are always created in the /tmp dir. I tried to
set up the /var/qmail/alias dir in the ezmlmwebrc,
but then i had an error with qmail [homedir is
writeable]. This is be
Rumor has it that Peter van Dijk may have mentioned these words:
[snip]
>file:
>195.219.116.19
>195.219.91.3
>198.30.222.8
>
>tool:
>perl -ne 'chomp(); print "$_:allow,RBLSMTPD=/-yuck fou./\n";'
;-)
I'd *love* to use that as my default t
Dani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi, i have a linux box running qmail + mysql with smtpauth, and
> > > the smtp is too slow delivering the outgoing messages. I would
> > > like to know if there is any thing i could do to solve this
> > > problem, if there are any parameters to be configured i
Daniel Abad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When a send a message to my virtual user, I check it from telnet and it's
> without subject and from!! What should I do??
Compose your message differently. The "From:" and "Subject:" fields in
the message header are completely optional.
This isn't a
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 06:50:33PM +0200, Lukas Beeler wrote:
[a lot of broken quoting]
Please, learn how to correctly reply to messages. Your "style"
makes it very hard to distinguish between your own words and these
of the one you replied to. You also quoted a signature, which is
bad style, to
"Per-fredrik Pollnow (EPK)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>But how to you do when you are using stunnel + smtpd ?
>
>This is some of the tings I have tried:
>--
>#!/bin/sh
>QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
>NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
>MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincomi
"Marenbach, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I just build and set up qmail for the first time (according to the
>installation description in Life with qmail) on a Solaris 5.8 box.
>
>I tried to start qmail by invoking
> qmail-start ./Mailbox splogger qmail
>and nothing at all did happen. No
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:38:19AM -0400, Roger Merchberger wrote:
[snip]
> 195.219.116.19:allow,RBLSMTPD=/-You are banned from sending mail here;
> known spam host./
> 195.219.91.3:allow,RBLSMTPD=/-You are banned from sending mail here; known
> spam host./
> 198.30.222.8:allow,RBLSMTPD=/-You are
Rumor has it that Russell Nelson may have mentioned these words:
>Smithj writes:
> > Use GIMP :)
>
>Yup. Anybody who uses an email client that they didn't write
>themselves (in assembly language) is just a poseur.
Altho I've never really stopped programming in assembly, I do *very* little
with i
hi
we are using Qmail 1.03 with LDAP ... and we have applied LDAP patch ... i
am now getting the "deferral:qmail-spawn_unabme_to_fork_(#4.3.0)" ... very
frequently also on Linux 7.0 we are getting error "bash: fork:
Resource temporarily unavailable" ..
the error message in maillog
Franz Sirl wrote:
> Incidentally I just got this to work yesterday on a server of mine. I had
> initial problems too, but I got rid of them with the following steps:
>
> - on "make cert" in the patched qmail-1.03 dir, entered the machines
> hostname for "Common name (...)"
> - removed "fixcrio"
At 12:01 01.08.2001, Per-fredrik Pollnow (EPK) wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I think I'm getting on you nerves in this mailing list with my SSL crap,
>but I need to get it to work.
>
>OK, This is what I have done: I have remake qmail-1.03 with tls.patch, and
>I replaced the qmail-smtpd and qmail-remote binary.
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = GFIPpap_01
Scanning Time = 08/01/2001 18:48:37
Action on virus found:
The attachment GFIPpap_01.xls.pif exists TROJ_SIRCAM.A virus. ScanMail has
Moved
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 03:51:59PM +0530, Mustafa Mahudhawala wrote:
> Hello,
> My Qmail is working fine , smtp / pop et al.
> BUT whenever I see Mail Headers I always have this ...
>
> I sent an email from indiatimes to my mail.
>
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTEC
Hello,
My Qmail is working fine , smtp / pop et al.
BUT whenever I see Mail Headers I always have this ...
I sent an email from indiatimes to my mail.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 78698 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2001 09:53:00 -
Received
Hi,
I think I'm getting on you nerves in this mailing list with my SSL crap, but I need to
get it to work.
OK, This is what I have done: I have remake qmail-1.03 with tls.patch, and I replaced
the qmail-smtpd and qmail-remote binary. I have done a
/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem (and I have
qmail works fine
I configured it with qmail-conf
but "qmailctl restart" does't works
I have a permanent message
"can't restart qmail-sendalready started"
I have the same when I do :
qmailctl stop
qmailctl start
where does that come from ??
thanx
@+
hello friends -
after a lot of hassles, i was successful in installing
Qmail+IMAP-with-Maildir-Patch-by-David-Harris+Vpopmail+MySQL.
following is my quesries relating to the above:
1. Does Vpopmail support
IMAP-with-Maildir-Patch-by-David? Or is it only good
for POP3 mails?
2. After installing
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 11:25:39PM -0800, Jon Reynolds wrote:
> The Subject of this email is the error i get at startup after i hit ctrl+c,
> when i reboot my system(freebsd4.3rc2)it hangs when trying to start qmail it
> looks like this:
>
> [1] 220
> qmail
> status: loal 0/10 remote 0/20
>
>
>Dani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi, i have a linux box running qmail + mysql with smtpauth, and the
smtp
>> is too slow delivering the outgoing messages. I would like to know if
>> there is any thing i could do to solve this problem, if there are
>> any parameters to be configured in any of
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 11:25:39PM -0800, Jon Reynolds wrote:
> smtpfwdd[352]: can't open semaphore file in "/var/smtpd/mqueue" (Permission
> denied) - bye!
This is no qmail message.
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 05:13:33PM +0700, Vu Xuan Ngoc wrote:
> I am using qmail-ldap with qmail-ldap-20010301.patch
So use the qmail-ldap list.
> I creat a ldap entry:
>
> dn: uid=media,ou=qmailusers,dc=vn
> objectClass: person
> objectClass: qmailuser
> ...
Don't hide details.
> accountStat
The Subject of this email is the error i get at startup after i hit ctrl+c,
when i reboot my system(freebsd4.3rc2)it hangs when trying to start qmail it
looks like this:
[1] 220
qmail
status: loal 0/10 remote 0/20
at this point it hangs and will go no further until i hit ctrl+c when that
is do
67 matches
Mail list logo
