At 8:16 AM -0700 10/20/00, Zack Zeiler wrote:
Hi. Got a question. I have a new installation of Solaris 8.
I have setup qmail on Linux a dozen times, no problem. First time on
solaris.
# make setup check
It goes throught the standard stuff and gets stuck here each time.
./compile
At 8:33 PM -0700 9/18/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to install qmail on the Solaris 7 x86 system using Life with
qmail. I have few problems:
1. /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run script is having some errors
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
exec
At 1:53 PM -0700 9/19/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am in the process of learning scripts so please be patient.
When you said use numbers did you mean gid and uid numbers instead of
id -u qmaild
id -g qmaild, so it will look something like this QMAILDUID=100
NOFILESGID=1001
Yes, exactly.
At 4:20 AM -0400 8/4/00, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 10:17:41AM +0200, Robin S. Socha wrote:
your way of quoting *may* be convenient for you. It is, however, annoying
for probably everyone else (particularly people not reading your "threads"
in a row. It also adds a
At 6:30 PM -0400 7/15/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have re-installed qmail-1.03, daemontools-0.70, and ucspi-tcp-0.88. I
used Life With Qmail as a guide. I can send mail out using pine. Sending
to a different address, I can receive it on netscape. Netscape picked up
the Maildir, and now reads
At 2:09 PM -0400 7/12/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 06:42:51PM +, Thomas Duterme wrote:
This is taken from some documentation on fetchmail. Is there anyway I can
inject things back into Maildir instead of mbox? (my other solution is to
start hacking the
At 5:10 PM +0200 6/17/00, Jens Georg wrote:
hello,
i am running qmail on a suse linux server with its systemclock set
correctly. unfortunately, qmail sets an incorrect time to every outgoing
mail. system time and time in mails differs in exactly 2 hours, i.e.
writing a mail at 16:00 o'clock sets
At 5:03 AM -0700 6/15/00, mwangu wrote:
To add to the info,
I am being forced to work with a legacy accounting
system with a mail client which is incapable of adding
MIME headers to emails as appropriate. When qmail
recieves the e-mail it strips out the £ (Sterling
sign) and replaces with (? or
At 5:38 AM -0700 6/15/00, mwangu wrote:
I must be doing something wrong then.
No, you're expecting the wrong thing. Here's what I think is
happening, although it's been years since I allowed sendmail on any
machine that I control. As I recall, sendmail thinks it's just fine
to muck around with
At 6:24 AM -0700 6/15/00, mwangu wrote:
Paul,
Thank you for your response.
Please do not take offence at my conclusion that qmail
is partly to blame. While my familiarity with MTAs
stops at sendmail, I am only just getting to grips
with the workings of qmail (I have been looking at
this issue
At 4:54 PM +0100 6/7/00, Nuno Ferreira wrote:
Thanks,
Meanwhile I was able to get it working.
However, I still am unable to make maildrop work with QMail.
I have installed maildrop-0.76b, I have
the following in ~/.qmail
./Maildir/
| /var/qmail/bin/preline /usr/local/bin/maildrop
and the
At 11:59 AM +0100 6/5/00, Nuno Ferreira wrote:
Alright, what I am seeing is this.
~/.qmail is working, forward works swell for example, but I either cannot
get the program (the | program) to work or I can but it is the program
that's not working.
My specific problem is this:
in ~/.qmail I have
At 11:34 AM +0900 5/8/00, Kristina wrote:
I am at the point of setting up my qmail-server as the mail-hub for my
organization. I have only used qmail for testing purposes so far and I am not
experienced with anti-spam techniques.
Now that I want to use my qmail-server in real life, there are
At 9:33 PM -0400 5/4/00, Bennett Samowich wrote:
Greetings,
I am relatively new to qmail, so forgive me if this is too simple...
With all of the current goings on about the "luv bug", I have a
question concerning qmail and filtering. My customer base uses
sendmail primarily, while I have
At 10:35 PM -0400 4/30/00, Mrs. Brisby wrote:
2) pop3 command XTND XMIT.
obvious PRO: no second connection necessary!
obvious CON: needs a custom client. I am looking for
one of these (preferably for windows and/or macos)
-- anyone want to let me know of one?
At 11:41 AM +0800 4/27/00, Isaiah Chua wrote:
hi folks,
I'm not sure if this has been asked before, but searching the FAQs
didn't produce anything, so I assume it could be new.
I'm trying to compile qMail on our RedHat 6.2 server and have
downloaded all the necessary files for qMail to be
At 9:41 PM +0200 4/17/00, quanta wrote:
Sorry I have one more question, I am using The Maildir format to make it
works with qmail-pop3d
but I can't find any client like pine or elm to work with it, do I have to
patch something??
Try mutt. http://www.mutt.org.
THX
Mikael
--
--
Paul J.
At 9:53 AM -0300 4/5/00, Luis Bezerra wrote:
Peter Pan, I not want your opinion. I want one solution
He told you the truth. It should not be delivering these mails,
unless you've misconfigured qmail. Therefore, it's not a relay.
Therefore, there is no "qmail relay opened". A relay is a
At 6:36 AM -0700 4/2/00, Irwan Hadi wrote:
I use this syntax at
/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file
[irwan@server qmail-smtpd]$ cat run
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 300 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -c 100 -x
At 11:53 PM -0500 3/31/00, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
Hi,
From: "Paul Schinder" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 3:06 PM -0500 3/31/00, Dave Sill wrote:
Do the spammers:
1) throw up their hands and admit defeat, or
2) start using valid (but wrong) domains in their envel
At 3:06 PM -0500 3/31/00, Dave Sill wrote:
Do the spammers:
1) throw up their hands and admit defeat, or
2) start using valid (but wrong) domains in their envelope return
paths, thereby defeating your rejection and escalating the arms
race?
Note that many are already doing
At 4:51 PM + 3/25/00, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
Does anyone have any idea what could be the problem? The
disk IO is very low and my computer is *really* sleeping,
with a load average (uptime etc) of approx. 1.4..
A loadaverage of 1.4 means you have on average 1.4 task waiting to
At 11:24 AM -0800 3/18/00, David E. Weekly wrote:
Uwe,
Okay. Fair enough. So I have a very, very trivial question for the list.
(BTW, ext2fs gave me a kernel Oops this morning: something I haven't seen
for 4.5 years!) I think that it is an appropriate one.
I have a Linux server with a good
At 8:03 PM + 3/12/00, David Pratt wrote:
Can anyone recommend an email client for Macs that it is qmail compatible?
I don't appear to be having any success trying to get my mail with Eudora.
Eudora on a Mac works fine with qmail-pop3d. (I'm using Eurora on a
Mac right now, but I've long
At 2:57 PM + 3/3/00, Derek Smith wrote:
Hi,
I want to have imapd use Maildir format maildrops and use vchpw also.
Does anyone do this, are there patches available for imap-maildir (or
another imap server) or is there another method of implementing this?
Sounds like you should check out:
At 10:40 PM -0500 2/24/00, Juan E Suris wrote:
Hello All,
Like a good qmail user, I changed qmail-pop3d from inetd to
tcpserver, but now it's really slow. It takes about 10 secs to
respond. Is this usual.
Following are my start scripts.
Thanks,
JES
here's what my run script look like:
At 11:55 AM -0500 2/11/00, Dave Sill wrote:
I'm having the same trouble with imap-4.5 (with David Harris' maildir
patches) that I had with APOP: plaintext login authentication works
fine, but CRAM-MD5 authentication fails every time.
With APOP, the challenge/response are easy to calculate, e.g.:
At 2:58 PM -0500 2/10/00, Dave Sill wrote:
Paul Schinder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2:39 PM -0500 2/10/00, Dave Sill wrote:
I installed Shinya Ohira's checkpw checkpassword replacement, and it
works fine with "checkpw" (standard USER + PASS authentication), but
with "che
At 2:39 PM -0500 2/10/00, Dave Sill wrote:
I installed Shinya Ohira's checkpw checkpassword replacement, and it
works fine with "checkpw" (standard USER + PASS authentication), but
with "checkapoppw" I get "authorization failed". I'm using fetchmail,
but I have the same problem when I "manually"
At 3:21 PM -0500 2/10/00, Dave Sill wrote:
Solaris 7 SPARC, gcc 2.8.1.
Compiler bug, maybe? I'm using 2.95.2 now, and it was 2.95.1 that
compiled the checkpw that does this:
leprss% fetchmail -vv -c --protocol APOP mors.gsfc.nasa.gov
Enter password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
fetchmail: 5.2.0
At 10:44 AM + 2/4/00, kevin wrote:
Hi All,
Is there anyone who knows about how to setup rblsmtpd ?
I've tried loads of different sources and I can't seem to find a way to
set-up qmail to bloke relay spam to my server.
This my current start-up for qmail in /etc/init.d :
At 12:43 PM +0100 2/4/00, Puck wrote:
Yes, that's what i thought of ... if i would be able to code this :-
I don't know (anymore) how to c-code and in perl i'm not familar
with sockets and so on :-((
Install libnet, available from CPAN (if you don't know what CPAN is,
you should:
At 11:11 AM +0600 2/1/00, Md. Sifat Ullah Patwary wrote:
Thanks Okky,
But I need fetchmail not to use pop account rather Queued mail from an SMTP
(qmail smtp) server. (Off line basis)
But, as you showed us, the remote server does not support ETRN, so
you can't do what you're trying to do. And
At 11:54 AM +0100 2/1/00, Vincent Schonau wrote:
From your emails to the list it seems that you're attempting to use
qmail using serveral different approaches. You should probably start
over, and follow the instructions at
URL:http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html#installation *exactly*.
At 10:24 AM -0500 12/23/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Marc-Adrian Napoli" spake unto me and said:
What i'm after is a solution that falls into place at the
qmail-send/qmail-local stage that will quickly check the
headers of the message to be delivered locally first for
any
On 05 Jun 1999 21:49:04 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
As a side note, I'd strongly recommend dumping ORBS in favor of a more
ethical blackhole list. The maintainer of ORBS has gone on public record
as blocking hosts because he "doesn't like their attitude," even if spam
has never gone anywhere
On 6 Jun 1999 13:23:01 -0400, John R. Levine wrote:
I've heard good things about RRSS (URL:http://relays.radparker.com/)
and
the person running it certainly seems to be much calmer and more
professional about it.
I saw this site mentioned on the Tidbits Talk list about a week ago. I
took a
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 05:04:06PM -0500, Joe Garcia wrote:
} Hey some of us youngins weren't around for the low bandwidth (modem) email
} days, which is what UUCP was created for. I couldn't even begin to tell you
} how to set up UUCP it my life depended on it. :) The funny part about
} this
38 matches
Mail list logo
