On Wednesday, August 01, 2001 20:19, Tom Beer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
wrote:
> > in a bounce message i got this
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3)
>
to clarify
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3)
I'm not going to try again; this
Hi,
in a bounce message i got this
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
CNAME lookup failed temporarily. (#4.4.3)
Both sending and receiving mail server use the qmail rpm's from bruce.
so the big-dns patch is applied.
The domain quint.be is under my control.
I really don't understand it because in the dns i ne
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 01:44:31AM -0700, Martin Bangieff wrote:
[snip]
> pop3stream tcp nowait root/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup \
> qmail-popup borsabg /bin/password /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d \
> Maildir
/bin/password should be /bin/checkpassword, I guess :)
Greetz,
Hi all
I'm trying to make my first configuration on qmail but have a strange
problem with onstalling the pop3 server.
Following the instructions I installed the checkpassword and all the tests
passed successfully:
#/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup host.com /bin/checkpas
Dear sir,
I am facing a very starange problem,
I am using qmail 1.03 on red hat 6.2 and giving mailing solution to 18
different customers, whose Mx pointing is my server.
My all the domains are listed in virtualdomains file with some prepend, Like
ttk-lig.com is one of the entry and i m using pr
ent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 7:50 AM
Subject: Strange problem...
> Hello,
> I have been running qmail for about 6 months without
> any problems.
> Since yesterday, people have been complaining that
> they are not
> receiving any email.. So I sent a few tests ones and
> sure enough
Hello,
I have been running qmail for about 6 months without
any problems.
Since yesterday, people have been complaining that
they are not
receiving any email.. So I sent a few tests ones and
sure enough they
were not arriving, Nor are they bouncing!
The error message in the log states:
qmail: 9
> This isn't entirely consistent with what you're describing, but the fact that
> you backed up and restored /var suggests that you may have screwed up the
> permissions on your trigger. See http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html#trigger
Thanks! That did the trick. It lacked g+w/o+w. Now I just h
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 06:29:30PM -0500, Peter Schuller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we recendly had a hard drive crash on a system using qmail. /home and /var
> were gone - we restored them from backup. No problem. We then installed a
> new hard drive and moved /var and /home over to it. After this, we
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 06:29:52PM -0500, Peter Schuller wrote:
> we recendly had a hard drive crash on a system using qmail. /home and /var
> were gone - we restored them from backup. No problem. We then installed a
> new hard drive and moved /var and /home over to it. After this, we are
> seeing
Hello,
we recendly had a hard drive crash on a system using qmail. /home and /var
were gone - we restored them from backup. No problem. We then installed a
new hard drive and moved /var and /home over to it. After this, we are
seeing some really strange things going on.
*All* local deliveries re
thanks,
that solved my problem.
Also sprach Alexander Pennace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01.10.2000:
The qmail-getpw program is responsible for telling qmail where .qmail
files responsible for a given local address are; your problems could
be caused by its confusion. What is the output of:
$ qmail-
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 09:12:45PM +0200, wolfgang zeikat wrote:
> there is no user t
> nor a user t-online
>
> but still mail to t-online is *not* handled
> by ~/alias/.qmail-default
> but just creates that error message, how i can i "catch" it?
The qmail-getpw program is responsible for tellin
there is no user t
nor a user t-online
but still mail to t-online is *not* handled
by ~/alias/.qmail-default
but just creates that error message, how i can i "catch" it?
wolfgang
Also sprach Tim Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 28.09.2000:
Check the permissions on your user t's Maildir
- Ori
Check the permissions on your user t's Maildir
- Original Message -
From: "wolfgang zeikat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "qmailist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 6:02 PM
Subject: strange problem with t-online
> in the cou
in the course of some mailing list activity i keep getting this error:
Sep 29 02:53:41 luzifer qmail: 970188821.500534 starting delivery 142187:
msg 582933 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sep 29 02:53:41 luzifer qmail: 970188821.500693 status: local 1/10 remote
1/20
Sep 29 02:53:41 luzifer qmail: 9701
"Joel Gautschi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I had a strange problem with mails to gmx.net today. Every message to
>gmx.net got this error:
>
>deferral: Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/
That usually means the remote host (gxm.net) i
I had a strange problem with mails to gmx.net today. Every message to
gmx.net got this error:
deferral: Sorry,_I_wasn't_able_to_establish_an_SMTP_connection._(#4.4.1)/
I tried
to do kill -ALRM [pid of qmail-send here]
but I always got the same error...
but I was able to telnet the (very
Thanks, I guess I misunderstood the way in which tcpserver workes.
David
>
> Ah, but your rcpthosts file is empty, which make qmail default back to
> relaying for everyone. The RELAYCLIENT variable in your tcprules only
> serves to tell it to ignore rcpthosts for certain IPs. Here, I can
> pr
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 12:38:15AM -0400, Gadoury wrote:
> Logging is already setup using multilog. I just haven't figured out how to
> read them. I downloaded a couple of utilities for reading them but the
> documentation is a bit vague.
The best program for making them clear and easier to un
Thus spake Gadoury ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> For some reason qmail-smtpd decided to stop recieving local mail delivered
> from a remote host.
And here is the reason:
> this is my /etc/tcp.smtp file:
>
> :deny
^
You may want to have a :allow instead -- this will let any computer connect
to t
Also sprach Gadoury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 14.09.2000:
>tcpserver: pid 32442 from 64.83.0.22
this one is *not* allowed by your /etc/tcp.smtp, so you deny (:deny)
>tcpserver: deny 32442 www.graycastle.com:210.228.3.165:25
>mail02.cavtel.net:64.83.0.22::2377
>tcpserver: end 32442 status 25600
>
> The logs are your friends, so I would highly recommend you start doing
> some logging. Whether you use DJB's multilog or splogger doesn't really
> matter. Splogger would probably be easiest to set up.
Logging is already setup using multilog. I just haven't figured out how to
read them. I d
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 11:23:39PM -0400, Gadoury wrote:
> no problem. by decided to stop receiving I meant that it was recieving email
> fine but now it isnt. The only things I have been making changes to are the
> startup scripts. Logging is going directly to console for this as I don't
> cur
no problem. by decided to stop receiving I meant that it was recieving email
fine but now it isnt. The only things I have been making changes to are the
startup scripts. Logging is going directly to console for this as I don't
currently have any programs set up to read the log files. Any sugges
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 10:51:01PM -0400, Gadoury wrote:
> For some reason qmail-smtpd decided to stop recieving local mail delivered
> from a remote host. I am able to send mail from the local domain to a
> remote domain (the machine I am sending mail from in both cases is a remote
> machine)
For some reason qmail-smtpd decided to stop recieving local mail delivered
from a remote host. I am able to send mail from the local domain to a
remote domain (the machine I am sending mail from in both cases is a remote
machine)
I have not made any changes to either /etc/tcp.smtp or to rcpthost
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 02:12:10AM +0200, Javier Ribelles wrote:
> Ok, it's understud, but... why did it work before restarting the
> machine? Why does it work with sendmail? (uh! don't hit me!! ;) ).
Qmail Doesn't Do That. It's that simple.
> That's why I'm worried, I've worked for
El Fri, 08 Sep 2000, escribiste:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Javier Ribelles wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all, first of all, sorry for some of my poor english expresions
> > you'll find in my mail, but it's been long since I last used it ;)
>
> De nada.
;)
>
> That works fine because qmail-inject creates
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Javier Ribelles wrote:
>
> Hi all, first of all, sorry for some of my poor english expresions
> you'll find in my mail, but it's been long since I last used it ;)
De nada.
> ...
>
> When I started qmail, all seemed to work fine... Mail was correctly
> delivered
Hi all, first of all, sorry for some of my poor english expresions
you'll find in my mail, but it's been long since I last used it ;)
Well, I have a problem which I don't know how dangerous for my system
may be, this is it.
I've installed qmail-1.03 with ucspi-tcp-0.88,
-Original Message-From: Barry Smoke
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 9:28
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Barry SmokeCc:
Qmail%List._Cr._Yp._To @list.cr.yp.toSubject: RE: help with strange
problem
hmmmy entries look like
this
with
the username in front
> to add
> I have discovered that the users that are working are in
> /var/control/users/assign
> what updates this file?
Maybe the problem is there. Check the entries in this file to be:
+domain.tld:user:uid:gid:directory where Maildir is:-::
for example... my account in my domain wou
aults1 1
-Original Message-
From: Barry Smoke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 8:54 AM
To: Brett Randall
Cc: Qmail@List. Cr. Yp. To
Subject: RE: help with strange problem
I never knew about this...because i've never set qmail up for
nis/nfs.whic
> I'm almost stumped on this one..it has to be something simple
> I would rather not have to run that cron script...if I don't have to.
> I concider it kind of a hack for now.
Ok...have you tried dumping the whole 'assign' setup? This should disable
its usage, since you don't need it. Giv
kind of a hack for now.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Randall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 1:05 AM
To: qmail
Subject: RE: help with strange problem
> to add
> I have discovered that the users that are working are in
> /var/control/users/as
I always check that first...so what
I'm getting is that this shouldn't be happening..the cron job definately
makes a new user work..but I'm not using NIS, or
NFS.
I
agree it is strange that the message says mailbox..what else might be
conflicting? AgainI have been u
> The qmail-users database is only needed when the home-directories
> are mounted via NFS or the passwords are managed by NIS or similar.
> During a NFS or NIS outage the messages would bounce if the users
> were not known locally. This way the message is deferred until NFS
> is up again.
As a su
On Die, 08 Aug 2000, Barry Smoke wrote:
> sure enough...after 2 hours...the next user I put in started working.and he got
>appended to /var/qmail/users/assign
> I've never seen this problem before..what can I do to make this instantaneous?
> What is updating that file?
>
> Someone Please
ve it somewhere else and its associated
files...probably recommended).
Brett.
Manager
InterPlanetary Solutions
http://ipsware.com/
-Original Message-
From: Barry Smoke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: help with strange probl
ssage -
From:
Barry Smoke
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 10:11
PM
Subject: Re: help with strange
problem
to add
I have discovered that the users that are working are in
/var/control/users/assign
what updates this
to add
I have discovered that the users that are working are in
/var/control/users/assign
what updates this file?
- Original Message -
From:
Barry Smoke
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 9:45
PM
Subject: help with strange problem
I have been pulling my hair out on this one all day long. I am
including all my information so you guys can help keep my hair in.
I have been running qmail on a mail machine at a k12 school for a
year...no real problems to speak of
now I have upgraded this server to redhat 7.0 beta...
"Mitul Limbani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My problem is when i send all the users message frm the console mode thru
>pine the messages get transferred to the users
>./Maildir/ directory
>but if i send the same thru my pop box using my isp as my relay server the
>mail gets stored in the ./Mailbo
Dear Users,
I m new user to this list and am having this strange problem with qmail, if
ne one can help me out i would be obliged.
I have installed qmail on to my server readin alll the necessay
documention.,
My problem is when i send all the users message frm the console mode thru
pine the
First give the two servers different locals.
> On our mail server we have a virtual domain under a user.
If you use a virtual domain anyway you can put the 4 user addresses
into virtualdomains too. I didn't test if this takes precedence over the
domain, but you may try it.
Else there is still
Have a strange case..
On our mail server we have a virtual domain under a
user. the .qmail-default file says ./Maildir/ so all the mail goes to
there...then i push the mail to those people when their online with maildirsmtp
(they have a linux dial up router with qmail on it). this works g
Bill Parker wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm running qmail v1.03, qmailadmin, tcpserver, vpopmail...what I want to
> do is have a copy of all mail received at [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (i.e. have one copy deposited in his mail dir at work, and the
> other to his ISP, b
Hi All,
I'm running qmail v1.03, qmailadmin, tcpserver, vpopmail...what I want to
do is have a copy of all mail received at [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (i.e. have one copy deposited in his mail dir at work, and the
other to his ISP, but when I do this with .qmail-sha
On Mon, Oct 18, 1999 at 07:32:37PM +0400, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
> I've set up qmail for several virtual domains, using FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE,
> and everything went just fine, until...
Did you read the 3.3R/errata ??
I'm just guessing ...
but there are two problems, one with lo0 and one with ppp(8
Hello!
I've set up qmail for several virtual domains, using FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE,
and everything went just fine, until...
I've set up inbound dialup.
I've tested all day today, I have 100% correlation, if ppp0 is up and
assigned, qmail-smtp crashes with signal 11 in constmap called from
rcpthost
I have qmail running. These are the relevant processes:
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -r -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c100
4478 ?S 0:00 tcpserver 0 pop-3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup orbital.
11780 ?S 0:00 qmail-send
11781 ?S 0:00 splogger qmail
11782 ?S 0:00
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: Re: A second strange problem.
>
>
> So, the point here is that smtpd responded with +OK for everything,
> leading me to believe the mail had been accepted and was delivered.
My bad. This is true - the +OK and -ERROR are from
POP sessions. I should of said XXX ok for the smtp session.
I was getting 2xx ok as responses.
Markus Stumpf wrote:
>
> SMTP dialog does not use "+OK" oder "-ERROR", but "Codes". See RFC 821
> for examples and definitions.
> Whatever y
"Thomas M. Sasala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you are missing the point. I'm not looking at the
>exit code. Let me be specific. I was using a Java transport class
>that was not properly written. I would send a message with this class
>and the class would say the message was se
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 11:24:57AM -0400, Thomas M. Sasala wrote:
> To debug the problem I used recordio. I noticed that the
> class was not reading any output from smptd. It just stuffed the
> whole message into smptd and exited. So, I modified the class to
> read input and check for +OK
I think you are missing the point. I'm not looking at the
exit code. Let me be specific. I was using a Java transport class
that was not properly written. I would send a message with this class
and the class would say the message was sent. However, in reality,
smtpd would reject the
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 07:32:45AM -0400,
"Thomas M. Sasala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was getting something like this (please note this is not
> the actual log - I can post that tomorrow is someone wants to see
> it):
>
> 933785415.436366 tcpserver: status: 1/40
> 933785415.437241 t
I was getting something like this (please note this is not
the actual log - I can post that tomorrow is someone wants to see
it):
933785415.436366 tcpserver: status: 1/40
933785415.437241 tcpserver: pid 6010 from 127.0.0.1
933785415.462990 tcpserver: ok 6010 localhost:127.0.0.1:25
localho
+ Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| As with disappering messages:
| smtpd simply accepts the email and hands it on to other processes
| (qmail-queue).
That statement may be a bit misleading. The cronology is the other
way around: qmail-smtpd hands the message to qmail-queue, and does not
giv
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 04:48:21PM -0400, Thomas M. Sasala wrote:
> In any case, why does smtpd return 256 and throw away the
> mail? I have records of a good transaction (all commands get a +OK)
> yet smtpd exits with 256 and the mail is eternally lost.
What do you mean with "smtpd exits
I wasn't checking the status of quit. As it turns out,
the transport implementation did not check the status of any of
command. It merely stuffed the whole message into the smtp
server and closed the connection. It never waited for a response
from the server. If the transport code had
On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 03:51:19PM -0400,
"Thomas M. Sasala" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff McNeil wrote:
> >
>
> I had a CR/LF problem with a JavaMail implementation. I used
> recordio to track down the problem. I first noticed the problem in
> the logs, whem smtpd would exit with
Jeff McNeil wrote:
>
I had a CR/LF problem with a JavaMail implementation. I used
recordio to track down the problem. I first noticed the problem in
the logs, whem smtpd would exit with a status of 256. The remote
unit would think the mail was delivered because smtpd said OK when
qui
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 15:08:02 -0400, Jeff McNeil wrote:
>The software generates my report fine, connects to the qmail server, and says
>it's successfully sent the message, but guess what? No Email. Email just never
>shows up.I can send an email though the same server via netscape without
>any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry about all the list clutter, I just seem to be having a bad day ;-)
The company I'm with uses Webtrends professional suite for our website
reporting. Webtrends is supposed to send an email responce containing a
website report.
The software
On Sun, 3 Oct 1999, Rogerio Brito wrote:
> Just to add something that I rarely see discussed in this
> list, at least in some environments, I've seen qmail deliver a
> bounce message saying that there was "no mailbox here by that
> name" when the user (hard) quota limit is
On Oct 03 1999, Shashi Dahal wrote:
> Hi,
> Only to few users, When I send mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I get a
> failure notice saying no mailbox here by that name.I can finger as
> well as work on the home directory. Is this a problem with the
> settings. Everything looks normal to me.
it look's like a problem i currently have.
a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] give the same failure but a message to a alias
of the user works fine.
This only by a few users.
marco leeflang
Shashi Dahal wrote:
> Hi,
> Only to few users, When I send mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I get a failure
> noti
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 04:39:25PM -0700, Shashi Dahal wrote:
> Only to few users, When I send mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I get a failure
> notice saying
> no mailbox here by that name.I can finger as well as work on the home
> directory.
> Is this a problem with the settings. Everything looks n
Hi,
Only to few users, When I send mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I get a failure
notice saying
no mailbox here by that name.I can finger as well as work on the home
directory.
Is this a problem with the settings. Everything looks normal to me.
TIA
Shashi
Are you running qmail-smtpd under tcpserver? If not, you should as this will allow you
to
get a more detailed log of smtp connections.
You could also try a tcpdump.
Si
seiheng wrote:
> The saddest part of live is you have to work some ppl who are _not_ helpful in
>solving
> problem.
>
> I ne
seiheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The saddest part of live is you have to work some ppl who are _not_
>helpful in solving problem.
Use recordio to record the SMTP dialogue with the problem system. See
the FAQ for details.
-Dave
The saddest part of live is you have to work some ppl who are _not_ helpful in solving
problem.
I need to do some thing (project related to my work) with this site, things have not
been working well be me and other guy, and they keep blaming is my fault.
Anyway, thanks for the info, sorry to bot
Hello
Netscape.net doesn't use qmail for inbound just out bound. We use
our own homegrown MTA at both USA.Net and Netscape.net.
I don't know if the sites you mentioned use qmail for incoming mail or not. Anyway,
qmail handles messages with bare lfs correctly. Besides, this may not be the problem.
Once again I'd suggest you ask the postmaster from this site to check their SMTP log
and see if that gives any indication.
Si
But, If remember correctly, yahoo.com and netscape.net both using Qmail, both
site able to receive the mail send from this MS SMTP server.
If other MTAs allow 'bare lf' why did Qmail disallow it? Is there a patch where I
could just make Qmail behave as other MTAs?
Thanks,
Sei Heng
Simon Rae wro
I've had the same problem receiving mail from a Microsoft SMTP server. I think
it's down to the 'bare lf' problem although I may well be wrong. Sendmail and
other MTAs accept these but qmail bounces them.
Ask this remote site to check their SMTP log for clues.
Si
seiheng wrote:
> There is this
There is this remote mail server that can send email to one of my server
running Sendmail, but it just can't send email to servers running Qmail (I
tested 3 server running Qmail, all of them cannot received email from that
remote server).
I have been running Qmail for most of may mail server. The
Russ,
The problem was that there was stuff in /var/qmail/users/assign that I didn't
put there.. It had nothing to do with anything in ~alias..
--Adam
On Sun, Jul 11, 1999 at 05:11:54PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Adam D . McKenna writes:
> > OK, I figured it out (sort of).
> >
> > ~alia
Adam D . McKenna writes:
> OK, I figured it out (sort of).
>
> ~alias/.qmail-postmaster was forwarding to root..
>
> When I changed it to adam-postmaster, mail to root started working again.
>
> Anyone have an idea why this happened?
Hahahahah! This is not to laugh at you, but to laugh
OK, I figured it out (sort of).
~alias/.qmail-postmaster was forwarding to root..
When I changed it to adam-postmaster, mail to root started working again.
Anyone have an idea why this happened?
--Adam
On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 12:27:00AM -0400, Adam D . McKenna wrote:
> Here's a dumb one. Can
Here's a dumb one. Can anyone tell me why this is happening?
adam@spotted:~$ cat ~alias/.qmail-root
adam-root
adam@spotted:~$ cat ~adam/.qmail-root
./Mail/root/
I tried changing ~alias/.qmail-root to be adam-rt instead of adam-root but
the same thing happens.
- Forwarded message from [EMAI
Hi,
On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 07:23:49PM +0200, Stefan Paletta wrote:
| Try leaving out the -f option to preline. Your uucp uplink needs a From
| line, I suppose.
hmm, now i get this:
--- cut here ---
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 16 21:06:03 1999
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to:
Kaspar Landsberg wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
> This looks pretty messed up. First, there is "From [EMAIL PROTECTED]" and
> "Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]". At least the return path should be
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" because that´s my mail address. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" does
> not exist! (Btw, "Ukl" is my
Hi all.
I´m currently experiencing a strange problem with the header of outgoing
mails. I´m using qmail in a UUCP-only environment (ie. that i all mails
and news are sent and received via UUCP) and have it configured
accordingly. The strange thing is that apparently, somewhere, the header
of
Eric Shafto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Russ, your criticism is valid, but not helpful. It would have taken
>less effort for you to tell Kyle what info he should be providing. If
>people doesn't know how to solve the problem themselves, they may well
>not know what information is important or
Eric Shafto writes:
> Russ, your criticism is valid, but not helpful. It would have taken
> less effort for you to tell Kyle what info he should be providing.
How about starting with a description of what he expected to happen,
and what really did happen? I would think that would be obvious.
Russell Nelson wrote:
>
> Kyle Buttress writes:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm having a strange problem with qmail and delivery?
> >
> > On one day the mail gets delivered to a particular virtualdomain user
> > and the net day the same user gets a failure
Kyle Buttress writes:
> Hi
>
> I'm having a strange problem with qmail and delivery?
>
> On one day the mail gets delivered to a particular virtualdomain user
> and the net day the same user gets a failure notice.
>
> I'm using qmail-1.03
Hi, Kyle. I
Hi
I'm having a strange problem with qmail and delivery?
On one day the mail gets delivered to a particular virtualdomain user
and the net day the same user gets a failure notice.
I'm using qmail-1.03
--
Kyle Buttress
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It fixed it.
Thanks a lot.
--George
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 05:43:44PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > I'm puzzled by the qmail-start script, maybe someone can give me a hint.
> > The script is like the following:
> >
> > supervi
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 05:43:44PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there,
> I'm puzzled by the qmail-start script, maybe someone can give me a hint.
> The script is like the following:
>
> supervise /var/lock/qmail /var/qmail/bin/qmail-start \
>'|dot-forward .forward ./Maildir/'
Hi there,
I'm puzzled by the qmail-start script, maybe someone can give me a hint.
The script is like the following:
supervise /var/lock/qmail /var/qmail/bin/qmail-start \
'|dot-forward .forward ./Maildir/' accustamp \
| setuser qmaill supervise /var/lock/qmail-cyclog cyclog \
> If the home directory (the directory where .qmail file is) has sticky
> bit set (ie. permissions like drwxr-xr-t), qmail postpones delivery
> (by setting sticky bit, you're telling "I am working on updates". Do
> chmod o-t ~
> --
> Petr Novotny, ANTEK CS
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.a
- Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| Mar 5 16:50:03 lspvs qmail: 920645403.863008 delivery 12: deferral:
| *Home_directory_is_sticky:_user_is_editing_his_.qmail_file._(#4.2.1)/*
Read the section SAFE QMAIL EDITING in the dot-qmail man page.
- Harald
I just installed qmail-1.03 on a RedHat 5.2.
I want to use procmail to handle the mail, so i copyed boot/proc
to rc.
I am using /var/spool/mail/~user as the mailbox.
Whenever i send a message to someone (localy) i get this:
Mar 5 16:50:03 lspvs qmail:
97 matches
Mail list logo
