Andy Abshagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are in the process of moving one our clients mail from our server to
> their own exchange server. What I need to know though is which takes
> precedence. The virtualdomains control file or the smtproutes control file.
virtualdo
hains to access identd for
> the gbnet.net domain and the mail is still the mail queue.
>
> Since my initial subscription (sometime ago) to Mutt list, I have added the
> gbnet.net in the /var/qmail/control/smtproutes file. The relaying server is my
> ISP's mail server. In this
the mail is still the mail queue.
>
> Since my initial subscription (sometime ago) to Mutt list, I
> have added the
> gbnet.net in the /var/qmail/control/smtproutes file. The
> relaying server is my
> ISP's mail server. In this case, this mail should have left
> my sys
pts to authenticate
> > my server by calling to identd. I have opened up ipchains to access identd for
> > the gbnet.net domain and the mail is still the mail queue.
> >
> > Since my initial subscription (sometime ago) to Mutt list, I have added the
> > gbnet.net in th
hains to access identd for
> the gbnet.net domain and the mail is still the mail queue.
>
> Since my initial subscription (sometime ago) to Mutt list, I have added the
> gbnet.net in the /var/qmail/control/smtproutes file. The relaying server is my
> ISP's mail server. In this
.
Since my initial subscription (sometime ago) to Mutt list, I have added the
gbnet.net in the /var/qmail/control/smtproutes file. The relaying server is my
ISP's mail server. In this case, this mail should have left my system long time
ago but it still remains in the mail queue. Why is it tryi
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 08:31:49AM -0500, Steve Woolley wrote:
> I am planning to use smtproutes to route email from a qmail server
> to an internal Microsoft Exchange 5.5 server.
> If the Exchange server goes down for a period of time, will the
> qmail server cache (for lack of a
I am planning to use smtproutes to route email from a qmail server
to an internal Microsoft Exchange 5.5 server.
If the Exchange server goes down for a period of time, will the
qmail server cache (for lack of a better word) the routed emails
locally until the Exchange server comes back up? or
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 03:46:55PM +, David L. Nicol wrote:
>
> what if /var/qmail/control/smtproutes was replaced with a fifo that
> gave a different relay every time it was read?
>
>
> #!/usr/local/bin/perl
> while(++$count){
> unlink '/var/qmail/cont
what if /var/qmail/control/smtproutes was replaced with a fifo that
gave a different relay every time it was read?
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
while(++$count){
unlink '/var/qmail/control/smtproutes';
system 'mkfifo /var/qmail/control/smtproutes';
$c=$count % 5;
Fine by me... as long as installing thew patch does not affect current config :)
Best regards :)
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:24:14PM +0100, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:21:28PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > [smtproutes vs mailroutes]
> > if smtrprout
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 08:21:28PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> [smtproutes vs mailroutes]
> if smtrproutes exists, they should be read and used. so far nothing changes
> against stock qmail.
> if mailrotes exists, the user has abviously read the INSTALL or README.
> There&#x
Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2001 00:47 schrieb Wolfgang Zeikat:
> In the previous episode (03.01.2001), Steve Hammond
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >I have set
> >smtproutes
> >to smtp:exchange.
>
> the syntax to send all mail (except for locals) to one hos
In the previous episode (03.01.2001), Steve Hammond
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I have set
>smtproutes
>to smtp:exchange.
the syntax to send all mail (except for locals) to one host is:
:that.one.host
wolfgang
Am Mittwoch, 3. Januar 2001 21:48 schrieben Sie:
> Hi,
>
> I have a redhat 7 \ qmail installation. I want to use this as a smtp
> frontend to send all messages to our exchange server. I have set smtproutes
> to smtp:exchange. When I send a message it gets delivered locally
1)
> I have a redhat 7 \ qmail installation. I want to use this
> as a smtp frontend to send all messages to our exchange
> server. I have set smtproutes to smtp:exchange. When I send
> a message it gets delivered locally to me
Make sure that the domain you are sending ma
Hi,
I have a redhat 7 \ qmail installation. I want to use this as a smtp
frontend to send all messages to our exchange server. I have set smtproutes
to smtp:exchange. When I send a message it gets delivered locally to me
using the procmail rc and when trying to use binmail rc nothing seems to
Hello ,
We are able to relay the messages when the smtproutes are there ,
but when i add my domain to the
smtproutes then it does not relays. eg my domains are prl.res.in
and prl.ernet.in
when i add the :prlfs.prl.ernet.in in the smtproutes , it works for
all the mails which are
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
> is it possible to have more than one smtproute for the same destination
> for the case that the first relay cannot be reached? if so, how?
No. smtproutes is read in a "last best match wins" fashion. So if you
have the entri
is it possible to have more than one smtproute for the same destination
for the case that the first relay cannot be reached? if so, how?
wolfgang
"CHIU, Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Originally I use smtproutes to route all outgoing messages to my isp smtp
> server. However, now, they set up rules to control email relaying. They
> implement smtp after pop. I need to login first before I can send out
Hi,
Originally I use smtproutes to route all outgoing messages to my isp smtp
server. However, now, they set up rules to control email relaying. They
implement smtp after pop. I need to login first before I can send out mail.
Can anybody share with me your experiences?
Thanks.
Regards
* Ed Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001204 10:47]:
> Where is the format for entries in smtproutes defined?
man qmail-remote
/pg
--
Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
If you lived in the Dark Ages and you were a catapult operator, I bet
Where is the format for entries in smtproutes defined?
While I have a default route set I want to add routes for certain
domains to test them.
Ed Weinberg, Q5 Comm, LLC.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel 914-713-7222
fax 914-713-7227
Connecting you to the internet...
all r under /var/qmail-2/
my /var/qmail-1/bin/qmail-smtpruns on port 25
my /var/qmail-2/bin/qmail-smtpd runs on port 26
in /var/qmail-1/control/smtproutesis
hotmail.com:[ip of same mechine]:26
then i restarted qmail along with qmail-smtpd
but , its
O'Yang Kai writes:
> I'm trying to increase the robustness of our qmail environment by setting up
> multiple default routes in control/smtproutes such as:
> ...
> :hub1.company.com
> :hub2.company.com
>
> The problem is that the emails will only route to hu
O'Yang Kai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to increase the robustness of our qmail environment by setting up
> multiple default routes in control/smtproutes such as:
> ...
> :hub1.company.com
> :hub2.company.com
>
> The problem is that the ema
Hi,
I'm trying to increase the robustness of our qmail environment by setting up
multiple default routes in control/smtproutes such as:
...
:hub1.company.com
:hub2.company.com
The problem is that the emails will only route to hub1 and never to hub2.
Before I try to implement round robin D
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 08:05:43AM +0200, mailing wrote:
> Hello,
>
>Could someone possibly send a few control/smtproutes examples, I haven't been
>able to find much info in the docs.
>
man 8 qmail-remote
> Is it possible to forward all mail for adomain.com t
Hello,
Could someone possibly send a few
control/smtproutes examples, I haven't been able to find much info in the
docs.
Is it possible to forward all mail for
adomain.com to mailserver.domain.com using this ?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Ken
try
:[123.234.123.234]
-Original Message-
From: John Conover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 31 August 2000 4:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: smtproutes syntax
Is it legal to use the ip address in smtproutes, somthing like:
:123:234:123:234
Thanks
Is it legal to use the ip address in smtproutes, somthing like:
:123:234:123:234
Thanks,
John
--
John ConoverTel. 408.370.2688 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
631 Lamont Ct. Cel. 408.772.7733
Campbell, CA 95008 Fax. 408.379.9602 http://www.johncon.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Or perhaps you didn't restart qmail after making the changes?
>
> That's a bad point. Each invocation of qmail-remote looks at this
> file so restarting qmail will not change a thing.
My bad. I can never recall offhand the exact configuration
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 01:17:45PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have an smtproutes file that contains the following:
> >
> > smtproutes:
> > chatfish.org:barbuda.chatfish.com
> > chatfish.net:barbuda.chatfish.com
> Note the smtproutes entries you have are for "chatfish.org" and "chatfish.net"
> _only_. If mail comes for anyone at "host.chatfish.org" or similar, MX
> records will be looked up as usual.
That's a good point.
> Or perhaps you didn't r
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 12:12:37PM -0700, J wrote:
> I have an smtproutes file that contains the following:
>
> smtproutes:
> chatfish.org:barbuda.chatfish.com
> chatfish.net:barbuda.chatfish.com
>
> I've also tried to use the ip address:
> chatfish.org:
J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an smtproutes file that contains the following:
>
> smtproutes:
> chatfish.org:barbuda.chatfish.com
> chatfish.net:barbuda.chatfish.com
>
> I've also tried to use the ip address:
> chatfish.org:[216.7.16.196]
> chatfish
I have an smtproutes file that contains the following:
smtproutes:
chatfish.org:barbuda.chatfish.com
chatfish.net:barbuda.chatfish.com
I've also tried to use the ip address:
chatfish.org:[216.7.16.196]
chatfish.net:[216.7.16.196]
Both of these methods are being ignored by qmail.
Qma
* Moritz Jodeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a way, how I could change the From-address from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? The From-address should
> only be changed for mail to the internet. Local mail should still be
> delivered as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,[ /var/qmail/doc/FA
I setup qmail on a small dialup machine. All local mail is delivered normally and mail
to the internet is relayed to smtp.my.provider.com.
My smtproutes contains the line
:smtp.my.provider.com
The problem is, that the smtp server of my provider checks the From address (or the
domain part of
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 11:05:18AM -0700, Jacob Scott wrote:
> I would like to bounce all mail incoming to my qmail machine (which is
> qmail.domain.com) for domain.com to mail.domain.com while i set up my
> server. What would this look like in smtproutes? I don't see this file in
I would like to bounce all mail incoming to my qmail machine (which is
qmail.domain.com) for domain.com to mail.domain.com while i set up my
server. What would this look like in smtproutes? I don't see this file in my
control files, and I didnt see it in the install docs. Can anyone poi
John L. Fjellstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I try to relay my mail to my ISP instead of trying to deliver mail
> myself.
>
> When I send mail through Eudora/Outlook, and send it directly to the ISP,
> I have no problems delivering the mail.
>
> When I set the smtp
I try to relay my mail to my ISP instead of trying to deliver mail
myself.
When I send mail through Eudora/Outlook, and send it directly to the ISP,
I have no problems delivering the mail.
When I set the smtproutes in qmail to the same ISP address, I get rejected
because of illegal relay
Martin Roest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is it possible to create user-based smtproutes like:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:foo
>
>I need to route every mailaddr in the domain to another mailserver
>except one.
No, but you can get the same effect using virtualdomains.
In contro
Hi,
Is it possible to create user-based smtproutes like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:foo
I need to route every mailaddr in the domain to another mailserver
except one.
It would be nice to do this with smtproutes.
Thnx in advance,
--
Roest, M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ibuildings.nl -- information arch
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 02:40:51PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
man qmail-remote
> How do I use SMTPRoutes?
>
> Please advice
> Michael Boman
--
See complete headers for more info
How do I use SMTPRoutes?
Please advice
Michael Boman
--
W I Z O F F I C E . C O M P T E L T D - Your Online Wizard
16 Tannery Lane, Crystal Time Building, #06-00, Singapore 347778
Voice : (65) 844 3228 [ext 118] Fax : (65) 842 7228
Pager : (65) 92 93 29 49 ICQ : 5566009
eMail
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 08:56:20 -0500 , Subba Rao writes:
> I am currently using dial-up connection for Internet and Intranet access.
> For Internet mail, I have defined my isp's smtp server in smtproutes file.
> For Intranet mail, I would prefer to use another smtp server. Is that po
I am currently using dial-up connection for Internet and Intranet access.
For Internet mail, I have defined my isp's smtp server in smtproutes file.
For Intranet mail, I would prefer to use another smtp server. Is that possible?
Can smtproutes be different for different user accounts?
Subb
e. Fix your DNS and
> I can guarantee that the rcpthosts-only entry will work.
Hmm. having readjusted the dns to serve a name instead of a number
on a test domain, it does not appear to bounce. I am not
removing my smtproutes entries, to reduce dns load, and to prevent
messages getting forwarded arou
Steve Vertigan wrote:
>
> if it was really a lower priority why did the error
> message begin "I am listed as the *primary mx* for this host"?
Because there's a bug in the way the determination of "primary MX"
is made. I have not looked at the source code of how the determination
is made.
$ d
You do NOT need the smtproutes entry if your DNS is set up correctly.
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Dustin Miller wrote:
> Can we get a consensus here?
>
> :)
> _
>
> Dustin Miller, President
> WebFusionDevelopmentIncorporated
>
>
> -Original Message-
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, David L. Nicol wrote:
> "Timothy L. Mayo" wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, David L. Nicol wrote:
>
> > > And add a line in control/smtproutes too; otherwise you'll
> > > bounce messages as qmail mistakenly interpret
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: secondary mail relay: rcpthosts AND SMTPROUTES
"Timothy L. Mayo" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, David L. Nicol wrote:
> > And add a line in control/smtproutes too; otherwise you'll
> > bounce messages as qmail mistakenly interprets that
"Timothy L. Mayo" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, David L. Nicol wrote:
> > And add a line in control/smtproutes too; otherwise you'll
> > bounce messages as qmail mistakenly interprets that it is supposed
> > to be the end recipient. This starts happe
. That way, qmail-smtpd will accept
> > the message, and then deliver it to mail.foo.com,
> > the primary MX.
> >
> > Qmail does not generate deferral notices.
> >
> > The time qmail will hold the message is in
> > control/queuelifetime, specified in seconds.
MX.
>
> Qmail does not generate deferral notices.
>
> The time qmail will hold the message is in
> control/queuelifetime, specified in seconds.
And add a line in control/smtproutes too; otherwise you'll
bounce messages as qmail mistakenly interprets that it is supposed
to be th
: Why don't you set up a name like aolmail.bittwiddlers.com pointing
: round-robin-wise at all four of the IP addresses, and stick that name in
: smtproutes?
Good idea. I hadn't thought of that one. Hopefully they won't change the
addresses often but it should work until
On Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 02:20:53PM -0500, Matthew Harrell wrote:
>
> : If you can get them to give you an IP address you're set. Use the IP
> : address in smtproutes instead of the name.
>
> Actually, I should have mentioned something about this. The MX address
>
et up - not
the ones that AOL sets up. I've been given this stuff by the company I'm
working for but it sounds like they have a partnership agreement which, for
some reason, allows bypassing these rules. I haven't actually tried it yet
due to this smtproutes problem and I don't
In a message dated 11/24/99 3:49:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< : PS: Can we all do that to get around AOL's filters, too?
No, according to them they need the IP's of the machines which will be
sending
mail. Of course I haven't actually tested that so I don't kno
mail, I'd just pick one of the partner MXes and put that in SMTProutes.
Well, it will be bunches of 200K recipient messages going out and I've know
AOL's mail routers so go down for over a day. Since this is time sensitive
material I can't really get away with waiting for a m
>Anyway, AOL would like all their email to go to
>partner.aol.com instead of the usual aol.com. The problem with setting it
>up in smtproutes like
>
>aol.com:partner.aol.com
>
>is that partner.aol.com has only MX records and no A records so it bounces.
I
: If you can get them to give you an IP address you're set. Use the IP
: address in smtproutes instead of the name.
Actually, I should have mentioned something about this. The MX address
actually points to four addresses and knowing how frequently AOL machines
go down I'm hesitan
Matt,
If you can get them to give you an IP address you're set. Use the IP
address in smtproutes instead of the name.
-Martin
On 24 Nov, Matthew Harrell wrote:
:
: Hi,
: I'm working on a mail system for a company and AOL has agreed to give
: them access through a b
like all their email to go to
partner.aol.com instead of the usual aol.com. The problem with setting it
up in smtproutes like
aol.com:partner.aol.com
is that partner.aol.com has only MX records and no A records so it bounces.
I'm sure someone has asked this before but is there an
On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, A.Y. Sjarifuddin wrote:
> Does smtproutes could route specific email to a specific server:
[...]
> a-p@domain:[IP Address]
> q-z@domain:[IP Address]
You cannot do this, because control/smtproutes is handled by
qmail-remote(8). It checks the first argumen
Yes. My smtproutes file looks like this.
ieee.org:gemini.ieee.org
lists.io.com:lists.io.com
suse.com:mail.suse.com
:mail.texas.net
Note the default address at the end (empty string on the left hand
side of the colon matches anything. I route solely by domain, nothing
user-specific though
Dear All,
Does smtproutes could route specific email to a specific server:
email for user with prefix ~a.. to ~p... will be delivered to mail
server A.
email for user with prefix ~q.. to ~z... will be delivered to mail
server B.
so it will be something like:
a-p@domain:[IP Address]
q-z
"Olivier M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>HOST1 = SCO Unix with qmail and a few scripts that are sending
>emails to the realworld via a relay. No dns access, subnet.
>IP = 192.168.0.50
>In /var/qmail/control/smtproutes, I have :
>:[192.168.0.10]
>
>
Wired smtproutes problem.
HOST1 = SCO Unix with qmail and a few scripts that are sending
emails to the realworld via a relay. No dns access, subnet.
IP = 192.168.0.50
In /var/qmail/control/smtproutes, I have :
:[192.168.0.10]
HOST2 = linux server, with normal qmail configuration
Definitely
Thanks a lot to the people who pointed out the error !
Grumble ;-) ...
GRTX
Juergen Kuersch
> Juergen Kuersch wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > on our firewall, I have a smtproutes file like this:
> >
> > <---snip>
> > # M
Title: AW: Problem: smtproutes entry obviously ignored ?
> Juergen Kuersch wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > on our firewall, I have a smtproutes file like this:
> >
> > <---snip>
> > # Mail to Rog1 must be directed to ROG1
> > rog1.rog.rwth-aa
Juergen Kuersch wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> on our firewall, I have a smtproutes file like this:
>
> <---snip>
> # Mail to Rog1 must be directed to ROG1
> rog1.rog.rwth-aachen:rog1.rog.rwth-aachen.de
Shouldn't that be
rog1.rog.rwth-a
Hi there,
on our firewall, I have a smtproutes file like this:
<---snip>
# Mail to Rog1 must be directed to ROG1
rog1.rog.rwth-aachen:rog1.rog.rwth-aachen.de
# Mail to CIP mail hosts uses central RWTH mail relay
cip.rog.rwth-aachen.de:mail.rwth-aachen.de
cip1.rog.rwth-aachen.de:mai
Add a DNS record for sub.domain.com pointing to mail.domain.com.
sub.domain.com IN MX 10 mail.domain.com.
Add sub.domain.com to rcpthosts on mail.domain.com.
Add the following to smtproutes on mail.domain.com.
sub.domain.com:[10.2.11.12]
Things should now work as you intend from both inside
e the
terminology is mail hub.
Anyway, the smtproutes file on mail.domain.com reads:
sub.domain.com:[10.2.11.12]
Sending email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from anywhere internally works fine.
It gets to mail.domain.com and is then routed to sub. However, when
sending email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] fro
be easy, though, since MXs
already work like that ? In the code that looks for MXs, you'd
just have to consider smtproutes if there exists one for the
destination, with a value related to its position in the file.
Disclaimer: haven't looked at the code.
--
#include Lorens Kockum
is it possible to something like this in smtproutes?
so that it if it fails trying to send to the first host (10.1.1.1),
qmail
will try sending it to the second host (10.1.1.2).. ive tried this and
it seems to be just taking whatever entry is last, which isnt the
desired
effect.. :)
domain.com
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 05:09:25PM -0400, Jason wrote:
> is it possible to something like this in smtproutes?
> so that it if it fails trying to send to the first host (10.1.1.1),
> qmail
> will try sending it to the second host (10.1.1.2).. ive tried this and
> it seems to
Hi,
My smtproutes is currently as follows:
eoc.org.uk:ms-mail.eoc.org.uk
.eoc.org.uk:
:relay.mail.uk.psi.net
Basically, mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is forwarded to our MS Mail
gateway;
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be delivered according to MX
records;
and outgoing mail is all relayed via our
d the new mail server would be
accepting mail by the end of the day, I stopped the mail relays from passing
mail onto the Xerox relay. I did this by configuring smtproutes to route to
an (unreachable) internal network address.
We spent the entire day setting up the firewall and running tests on
Mate Wierdl writes:
> This is exzactly my question: suppose I have only two machines, box1.home,
> and box2.home. Can I just put
>
> :box2.home
>
> in smtproutes on box1.home to direct all remote mail to box2---though
> box2.home is in only /etc/hosts?
No - you mu
Mate Wierdl wrote/schrieb/scribsit:
> Also, is the syntax
>
>:[1.2.3.4]
>
> valid, if 1.2.3.4 is the IP of box2.home?
Yes. No need for DNS here.
Stefan
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 10:47:01PM +, Sam wrote:
> Mate Wierdl writes:
>
> > So with stock qmail, I *must* have DNS?
>
> Correct. If you don't have DNS running, your network must be so small that
> putting a few lines into control/smtproutes shouldn't be much
Mate Wierdl writes:
> So with stock qmail, I *must* have DNS?
Correct. If you don't have DNS running, your network must be so small that
putting a few lines into control/smtproutes shouldn't be much of a hassle.
--
Sam
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 10:38:12PM +0530, Sameer Vijay wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I would suggest that you put the name and ip (1.2.3.4) in /etc/hosts
> and put the name in the smtproutes
>
> :remote.host
>
> I am not sure whether putting brackets there will help. just the
gt; |
> | Would putting
> |
> | :[1.2.3.4]
> |
> | in smtproutes work, where 1.2.3.4. is the remote box's IP on the
> | home network.
>
> I think you would need to patch qmail-remote to skip the CNAME
> lookups, or provide a fake dns_cname() that does no actual lookup.
So
- Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| Suppose I have a box running qmail on a home network without DNS.
| How can I route all remote messages to another box on the home
| network?
|
| Would putting
|
| :[1.2.3.4]
|
| in smtproutes work, where 1.2.3.4. is the remote box's IP on
Suppose I have a box running qmail on a home network without DNS. How
can I route all remote messages to another box on the home network?
Would putting
:[1.2.3.4]
in smtproutes work, where 1.2.3.4. is the remote box's IP on the home
network.
Thx
Mate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 22 January 1999 at
16:47:15 +0100
> BTW: Why does qmail-remote not use /etc/hosts ?
I know of 2 reasons off-hand:
1. /etc/hosts doesn't have anything like MX records, and a host might
be listed in /etc/hosts that doesn't actually accept its
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Bernhard Duebi writes:
> > > is it possible to have more than one relay for a given route in
> > > smtproutes ?
> >
> > Yes and no. You have to do it through the DNS. Make a new name for
> > the hosts involved,
> Bernhard Duebi writes:
> > is it possible to have more than one relay for a given route in
> > smtproutes ?
>
> Yes and no. You have to do it through the DNS. Make a new name for
> the hosts involved, and put it into the DNS as a round-robin A record,
> or a
Bernhard Duebi writes:
> is it possible to have more than one relay for a given route in
> smtproutes ?
Yes and no. You have to do it through the DNS. Make a new name for
the hosts involved, and put it into the DNS as a round-robin A record,
or a special load-balancing name serv
Dear Qmail Admins,
is it possible to have more than one relay for a given route in
smtproutes ?
I use qmail as a relay from the internet to the internal mail server.
The internal mail server is built of two maschines. When one goes down,
the other one takes over automaticaly. Normaly this is
.qmail.org, but I can't find it
> > there now.]
>
> This is going to be really helpful! Thanks!
>
> > This won't solve the dynamic IP problem, though. It allows the domain
> > to request delivery of its email, but it still uses the smtproutes to
> > deter
rry's ETRN patch:
>
> http://www.cqc.com/~pacman/projects/qmail-etrn/
>
> [I think this used to be listed on www.qmail.org, but I can't find it
> there now.]
This is going to be really helpful! Thanks!
> This won't solve the dynamic IP problem, though. I
27;t solve the dynamic IP problem, though. It allows the domain
to request delivery of its email, but it still uses the smtproutes to
determine how to get it there.
Note that since you don't know the IP address, you'll have to accept an
ETRN from *anyone*, which is suboptimal.
ery to that
IP address.
Serialmail handles the envelope information so it's not mangled.
qmail does -not- have a queue'ing system designed for serial connections.
drop all the virtual domain's mail in a maildir. when the domain connects,
trigger maildirsmtp to the IP of the conn
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
