Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys issue

2019-11-23 Thread Eric Broch
I'd be interested in knowing what DKQUEUE is. Can you set DKDEBUG="1" in tcp.smtp and check the logs. You should see something like this: "Will use qmail-queue.orig as qq handler." I suspect that qmail-queue.orig is being called by qmail-dk which causes me some confusion as to why you're getti

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys issue

2019-11-23 Thread Eric Broch
Sounds like you back to where you were at the beginning? On 11/22/2019 11:24 PM, Tony White wrote: Hi Eric,   Did that just now and restarted qmail. Receiving emails then generated qq Soft rejects. I relinked the qmail-dk as qmail-queue leaving out the change to tcp.smtp and the error stopped. D

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys issue

2019-11-22 Thread Tony White
Hi Eric,   Did that just now and restarted qmail. Receiving emails then generated qq Soft rejects. I relinked the qmail-dk as qmail-queue leaving out the change to tcp.smtp and the error stopped. Does this make any sense to you? TIA :) best wishes Tony White On 23/11/19 1:56 pm, Eric Broch

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys issue

2019-11-22 Thread Eric Broch
List your bin directory: # ls -la /var/qmail/bin What's in tcp.smtp: # cat /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp On 11/22/2019 6:22 PM, Tony White wrote: Hi folks,   Im stuck. I have been trying to disable domainkeys again but each time I try i get this error in my logs... qmail error 451 qq trouble cre

[qmailtoaster] domain keys issue

2019-11-22 Thread Tony White
Hi folks,   Im stuck. I have been trying to disable domainkeys again but each time I try i get this error in my logs... qmail error 451 qq trouble creating files in queue I tried this method as well and still get the sameresult. http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Disabling_Domain_Keys Any

[qmailtoaster] Domain keys error bounce with list messages

2013-07-29 Thread Fabian Santiago
I've received an email from the qmailtoaster ezmlm system stating that messages to me have bounced with this error: 554 DomainKeys verify status: no key   (#5.3.0) Anyone else stumble upon this? Do I just need to white list the toaster list address? Thanks. Also, I have received list emails

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys problem?

2011-08-11 Thread Mustafa Toraman
Awesome tutorial! Thank you for reply Jack. Works perfect! Btw, here is also a simple text tutorial on web by Jake. http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/How_to_Setup_DKIM_with_Qmail_Toaster Greetings from Turkiye, Regards Aug 10, 2011 tarihinde 4:36 PM saatinde, MagicWISP şunları yazdı: > >

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys problem?

2011-08-11 Thread Mustafa Toraman
Awesome tutorial! Thank you for reply Jack. Works perfect! Btw, here is also a simple text tutorial on web by Jake. http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/How_to_Setup_DKIM_with_Qmail_Toaster Greetings from Turkiye, Regards Aug 10, 2011 tarihinde 4:36 PM saatinde, MagicWISP şunları yazdı: > >

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys problem?

2011-08-11 Thread Mustafa Toraman
Awesome tutorial! Thank you for reply Jack. Works perfect! Btw, here is also a simple text tutorial on web by Jake. http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/How_to_Setup_DKIM_with_Qmail_Toaster Greetings from Turkiye, Regards Aug 10, 2011 tarihinde 4:36 PM saatinde, MagicWISP şunları yazdı: > >

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys problem?

2011-08-10 Thread MagicWISP
Quoting Mustafa Toraman : Hi all, I need help about domain keys on QMT. For a long time, still I cant find any solution to sign emails with domain keys. I have read the topic related about disabling domain keys due broken keys since 2008. Then I tried a few patch for it but there is no

[qmailtoaster] Domain Keys problem?

2011-08-10 Thread Mustafa Toraman
Hi all, I need help about domain keys on QMT. For a long time, still I cant find any solution to sign emails with domain keys. I have read the topic related about disabling domain keys due broken keys since 2008. Then I tried a few patch for it but there is no result. Anybody using DKIM with

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: > > Then they're being signed. > I don't know why sa-t...@sendmail.net would report no result. Perhaps you > should ask them. ;) > > Your absolutly right, i just sent a email to another acount and yes, its signed. Ill think ill ask the sendmai

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread Eric Shubert
petrus wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Eric Shubert > wrote: That looks ok to me. If you send yourself an email, do you see a signature in the headers? Yea i do Thats a bit odd? Then they're being signed. I don't know why sa-t...@sendmail.net woul

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: > > That looks ok to me. > If you send yourself an email, do you see a signature in the headers? > > Yea i do Thats a bit odd?

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread Eric Shubert
petrus wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Eric Shubert > wrote: Oh yeah. Haven't seen that in a while. Links look ok then. Are permissions/ownership ok on the /var/qmail/control/domain and lower directories/files? I have them readable by vchkpw group.

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: > > Oh yeah. Haven't seen that in a while. Links look ok then. > Are permissions/ownership ok on the /var/qmail/control/domain and lower > directories/files? I have them readable by vchkpw group. > > Me to, apati.se is the one Iv created but iv

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread Eric Shubert
petrus wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Eric Shubert > wrote: $ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 23 2009-09-30 15:49 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue -> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk* $ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: > $ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue >> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 23 2009-09-30 15:49 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue -> >> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk* >> $ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk >> -rws--x--x. 1 qmailq qmail 49K 2009-09-30 15:42 /var/qmail/bi

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread Eric Shubert
petrus wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Eric Shubert > wrote: What does # ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue show? $ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 23 2009-09-30 15:49 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue -> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk*

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: > > What does > # ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue > show? > $ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 23 2009-09-30 15:49 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue -> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk* $ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk -rws--x--x. 1

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread Eric Shubert
petrus wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Jake Vickers > wrote: Change your tcp.smtp file back to have the % in it instead of your domain name, and try again. the % gets expanded when it signs automatically. Did you configure DNS? My tcp.s

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Jake Vickers wrote: > > Change your tcp.smtp file back to have the % in it instead of your domain > name, and try again. the % gets expanded when it signs automatically. > Did you configure DNS? > > My tcp.smtp is now 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread Jake Vickers
petrus wrote: Hi List Iv been trying to get domainkeys to work, but even after reading and following the wiki(and the video) I still cant get my Toaster to sign outgoing emails. My /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp looks like this: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/apati.

[qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
Hi List Iv been trying to get domainkeys to work, but even after reading and following the wiki(and the video) I still cant get my Toaster to sign outgoing emails. My /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp looks like this: 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/ apati.se/private" :allow

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-03-06 Thread Eric Shubert
Adi Nugroho wrote: Thank you for all your help for my SPF. It is working nice now. Let me ask again about domainkey. I have follow http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys but my server is NOT signing my mails. here is what I have done: 1. Create the domainkey # cd /var/qmail/control

[qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-03-06 Thread Adi Nugroho
Thank you for all your help for my SPF. It is working nice now. Let me ask again about domainkey. I have follow http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys but my server is NOT signing my mails. here is what I have done: 1. Create the domainkey # cd /var/qmail/control/domainkeys # mkdir

[qmailtoaster] Domain keys Problem

2008-07-09 Thread Anil Aliyan
Untitled DocumentDear All, I have recently intalled qmailtoaster with Domainkeys. But when mails are delivered into yahoo and gmail mailbox the headers shows the as follows: In yahoo it says domainkeys=fail (bad sig) and in gmail it says DomainKey-Status: bad domainkeys=hardfail YAHOO:

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain keys

2008-05-14 Thread Charles Law
To reverse what you did (restoring the toaster to it's original state): # cd /var/qmail/bin # ln -sf qmail-dk qmail-queue This is the answer from Eric. I've tested and it's working. Charles Law Kisakye ALex wrote: Greetings, I followed the following to disable domain keys, can anyone show me

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain keys

2008-05-14 Thread Eric Shubert
Kisakye ALex wrote: > Greetings, > I followed the following to disable domain keys, can anyone show me how > to re-enable it > > cd /var/qmail/bin > ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue > And then restart qmail: > > qmailctl restart > > thanks > > > ALex > cd /var/qmail/bin ln -sf qmail-dk qm

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2008-05-14 Thread Jake Vickers
Kisakye ALex wrote: Greetings, Am seeing many of these in my spamd logs warn: Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/DomainKeys/Key/Public.pm line 67, line 149. Can someone help me sort this out. A few changed I had done to this box were disabling d

[qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2008-05-14 Thread Kisakye ALex
Greetings, Am seeing many of these in my spamd logs warn: Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/DomainKeys/Key/Public.pm line 67, line 149. Can someone help me sort this out. A few changed I had done to this box were disabling domain keys, could tha

[qmailtoaster] Domain keys

2008-05-14 Thread Kisakye ALex
Greetings, I followed the following to disable domain keys, can anyone show me how to re-enable it cd /var/qmail/bin ln -sf qmail-queue.orig qmail-queue And then restart qmail: qmailctl restart thanks ALex - Qmail

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys and DNS Trouble

2008-03-04 Thread PakOgah
Richard Starkie wrote: Hi All Am having trouble registering the DNS entries for my domains, when using djbns, can anyone advise the correct way to do it? I have created the domain keys, both public & private, I have followed the instructions as per the instructions on the wiki page fo

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys and DNS Trouble

2008-03-03 Thread Eric Shubert
Richard Starkie wrote: > Hi All > > Am having trouble registering the DNS entries for my domains, when using > djbns, can anyone advise the correct way to do it? > > I have created the domain keys, both public & private, I have followed > the instructions as per the instructions on the wiki page

[qmailtoaster] Domain Keys and DNS Trouble

2008-03-02 Thread Richard Starkie
Hi All Am having trouble registering the DNS entries for my domains, when using djbns, can anyone advise the correct way to do it? I have created the domain keys, both public & private, I have followed the instructions as per the instructions on the wiki page for CentOS. Any help gratef

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-30 Thread Phil Leinhauser
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 7:17 PM To: Phil Leinhauser Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking Phil, Here is the exact record from my DNS. private._domainkey.companions.com. IN TXT "k=rsa; p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAL

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TED] > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 6:48 PM > To: Phil Leinhauser > Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking > > I can email you directly about this and appreciate your helping with this > :). > > It is companions.com and mail.companions.com. > >> Typ

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29, 2007 12:17 PM > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking > > A full day later and I am still getting the same result from the test? > > Testing xxx.com > New test > No _domainkey TXT record found for xxx.com > &

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can email you directly about this and appreciate your helping with this :). It is companions.com and mail.companions.com. > Type the following: > nslookup > set type=TXT > _domainkey.yahoo.com > YOU GET THE t=y; o=~ RESPONSE > S1024._domainkey.yahoo.com > YOU GET THE PUBLIC KEY ]# nslookup > s

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-30 Thread Phil Leinhauser
g with the right info. When we get it fixed, we will update the group. Phil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 6:48 PM To: Phil Leinhauser Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking I can email you directly abou

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-30 Thread Phil Leinhauser
IL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 4:25 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking > Did you add the _domainkey to your DNS? Also, inside that there should be a > txt record with your private key. These are what I curren

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Did you add the _domainkey to your DNS? Also, inside that there should be a > txt record with your private key. These are what I currently have in the BIND DNS setup for this domain; domainkey.xxx.com. IN TXT "t=y; o=-" private._domainkey.xxx.com. IN TXT "k=rsa; p=ME

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-30 Thread Phil Leinhauser
2007 12:14 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking As far as I know I've done that correctly. I'm obviously missing something since it's still not working. private._domainkey.xxx.com. IN TXT "k=rsa; p=ME

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t DNS, the _domainkey looks like a sub domain. Actually it's a > holder for service records. The private record goes in that. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:17 PM > To: qmailtoaster-list@qm

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
up in my tcp.smtp file but am not for > sure. > > I posted it a couple of emails back > > Thanks > Q > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:17 PM > To: qmailtoaster-list@qma

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-30 Thread Phil Leinhauser
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:17 PM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking A full day later and I am still getting the same result from the test? Testing xxx.com New test No _domainkey TXT r

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-29 Thread Kyle Quillen
@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking A full day later and I am still getting the same result from the test? Testing xxx.com New test No _domainkey TXT record found for xxx.com Does anyone else have any input on this? I can't believe I'm the only

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A full day later and I am still getting the same result from the test? Testing xxx.com New test No _domainkey TXT record found for xxx.com Does anyone else have any input on this? I can't believe I'm the only one still having this problem as I've seen countless others post about it. I ver

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-28 Thread Todd W
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hmm, I'm still being defferred by yahoo and going to the junk folder on hotmail. Junk folder is at least something and gmail works perfectly now. Nice. For me gmail goes to the bulk folder and mail to hotmail is discarded. private._domainkey.xxx.com. IN TXT "k=rsa

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The results of my testing all fail so far. MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PRA: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SPF-Record-Classic: none found SPF-Record-MFROM Scope: none found SPF-Record-PRA Scope: none found SPF-Method Result: unknown(xxx.com: domain of xxx.com uses a mechanism not recognized by this client) Se

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm, I'm still being defferred by yahoo and going to the junk folder on hotmail. Junk folder is at least something and gmail works perfectly now. private._domainkey.xxx.com. IN TXT "k=rsa; p=MEww**SNIP**AQIDAQAB" xxx.com.IN TXT "spf2.0/pra" xxx.com.IN TXT

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-28 Thread Kyle Quillen
,RELAYCLIENT="" 64.24.214.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 12.191.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 64.27.31.108:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 74.218.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" 12.43.212.194:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" -----Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks. On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:23:43 -0500, Todd W wrote: > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi Todd, > >>> As per my previous posts this morning on this topic, the following has >>> been 100% effective on seven qmail servers that I manage in getting mail >>> delivered: >>> >>> Hotmail/MSN: null

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-28 Thread Todd W
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi Todd, As per my previous posts this morning on this topic, the following has been 100% effective on seven qmail servers that I manage in getting mail delivered: Hotmail/MSN: null spf2 TXT record Yahoo: setup DK to sign outbound mail for your domain Gmail: setup

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Todd, >> As per my previous posts this morning on this topic, the following has >> been 100% effective on seven qmail servers that I manage in getting mail >> delivered: >> >> Hotmail/MSN: null spf2 TXT record >> Yahoo: setup DK to sign outbound mail for your domain >> Gmail: setup both DK t

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have yet to find a way of getting past these problems. Yahoo mail and gmail is still being deferred while hotmail just plain disappears. What was the final suggestion on this? I can't seem to find those emails and wish to try them once more. Mike > From: "Adam Cantwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-28 Thread Todd W
From: "Adam Cantwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> As per my previous posts this morning on this topic, the following has been 100% effective on seven qmail servers that I manage in getting mail delivered: Hotmail/MSN: null spf2 TXT record Yahoo: setup DK to sign outbound mail for your domain Gmail

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-28 Thread Todd W
From: "Erik A. Espinoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Nov 20, 2007 6:46 PM, Adam Cantwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Todd W wrote: > From: "Todd W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> I'm using 'v=spf1 mx -all' for my spf record. Is this a good, generic >> setting that we can suggest on the wiki? (i.e. accept m

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys and Windows DNS Server

2007-11-26 Thread A M
Hi, it's just like bind 2007/11/23, Chris Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > > > My company uses Windows DNS servers, im trying to set domain keys up and > have been using the wiki guide to setting them up. Im at the point where I > need to configure the authoritative DNS server which is a Wi

[qmailtoaster] Domain Keys and Windows DNS Server

2007-11-23 Thread Chris Bird
Hi, My company uses Windows DNS servers, im trying to set domain keys up and have been using the wiki guide to setting them up. Im at the point where I need to configure the authoritative DNS server which is a Windows 2003 server, the guide only has instructions on what the public key txt recor

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-20 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
IIRC from the standard, the use of mx and ptr is unreliable and should be avoided at all costs. On Nov 20, 2007 6:46 PM, Adam Cantwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Todd W wrote: > > > > From: "Todd W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >> I'm using 'v=spf1 mx -all' for my spf record. Is this a good, ge

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-20 Thread Adam Cantwell
Todd W wrote: From: "Todd W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'm using 'v=spf1 mx -all' for my spf record. Is this a good, generic setting that we can suggest on the wiki? (i.e. accept mail from all domains listed in the given domain's MX section) So does the list agree that this is a sane generic DNS

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-20 Thread Todd W
From: "Todd W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'm using 'v=spf1 mx -all' for my spf record. Is this a good, generic setting that we can suggest on the wiki? (i.e. accept mail from all domains listed in the given domain's MX section) So does the list agree that this is a sane generic DNS TXT record to

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got so caught up in the lost hostname and IMAP/POP not starting that I've not been able to get back to the domainkeys issue. Domainekys are turns off at this point as suggested for testing. I'm still getting deferred sends to yahoo and god knows what to hotmail. When I test using various Interne

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really? I'll give it another try. Which form did you use? I've sent it several times, just can't seem to reach anyone. Mike On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:53:26 -0500, Todd W wrote: > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> It's impossible to reach anyone there, at least has been with me. I've >> filled in

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-13 Thread Todd W
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It's impossible to reach anyone there, at least has been with me. I've filled in their forms several times as well and even after making all of the changes suggested in this thread, I'm still being deferred. Talk about confusing. I did eventually get through to a hu

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's impossible to reach anyone there, at least has been with me. I've filled in their forms several times as well and even after making all of the changes suggested in this thread, I'm still being deferred. Talk about confusing. On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:06:07 +0700, PakOgah wrote: > once I get the

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-13 Thread PakOgah
once I get the form from Yahoo to get my Server IP whitelisted but then if I check my send log it still deferred by Yahoo 2007-11-13 14:48:04.241798500 delivery 479586: deferral: User_and_password_not_set,_continuing_without_authentication./<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>_216.39.xx.xx_failed_after_I_sent_t

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Todd W
From: "Adam Cantwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have been dealing with the Hotmail/MSN issue for quite some time, and the general consensus from everywhere I've searched has been to add the null SPF 2 record. Until Microsoft fixes their implementation of senderID, the null SPF 2 record IS the fi

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Adam Cantwell
Todd W wrote: From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:17:50 -0500, Kyle Quillen wrote: I have been fighting a problem with yahoo in that they are deferring all of my mail. Of course I have gone and filled out all of their forms and such but I just cannot seem to figure out what i

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Todd W
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:17:50 -0500, Kyle Quillen wrote: I have been fighting a problem with yahoo in that they are deferring all of my mail. Of course I have gone and filled out all of their forms and such but I just cannot seem to figure out what is going on and

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Todd W
From: "Kyle Quillen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If I remember correctly Domain Keys was broken in the Toaster and thus was disabled. I dont know for sure myself because I'm just learning it, too. But: When you talk about domain keys and qmt, there are two seperate parts. 1. setting up DNS and cer

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Kyle Quillen
: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking Kyle Quillen wrote: > If I remember correctly Domain Keys was broken in the Toaster and thus was > disabled. > > How did you work around that or is it now working correctly? > > Thank

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Adam Cantwell
Kyle Quillen wrote: If I remember correctly Domain Keys was broken in the Toaster and thus was disabled. How did you work around that or is it now working correctly? Thanks Q I wasn't aware DK was broken in the toaster? I admin several QMT boxes, but none of them actually use DK to sign,

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Kyle Quillen
Hmm ok I will start to dig into this a little deeper Thanks Q -Original Message- From: Tim Mancour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 11:30 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking I don't think that

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Tim Mancour
ubject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking If I remember correctly Domain Keys was broken in the Toaster and thus was disabled. How did you work around that or is it now working correctly? Thanks Q -Original Message- From: Adam Cantwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 1

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Kyle Quillen
@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking Kyle Quillen wrote: > So am I Right in saying that my dns record should look like this for the > spf2.0 > > IN TXT "spf2.0/pra" > > > Thanks > Q > Yes, that syntax is correct. Lik

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Kyle Quillen
Yes I use dnsstuff on a regular basis Thanks q -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:53 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking Out of curiosity, have you tried

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Adam Cantwell
Kyle Quillen wrote: So am I Right in saying that my dns record should look like this for the spf2.0 IN TXT "spf2.0/pra" Thanks Q Yes, that syntax is correct. Like I said, that alone solved all of my issues with Hotmail/MSN. As for Yahoo, they don't check SPF. They are the origi

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rom: Warren Melnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:29 AM > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking > > > Do you have a properly formatted SPF record in place for your domain? > > W &g

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Do you have a properly formatted SPF record in place for your domain? According to dnsstuff I seem to but then, it's not always right either. Are there any sites on the net that allow you to send them an email as a test for an analyzed result? > For Yahoo, you should have domainkeys setup prop

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Kyle Quillen
ubject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking Warren Melnick wrote: > Do you have a properly formatted SPF record in place for your domain? > > W > > On Nov 12, 2007 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Kyle Quillen
ion, please contact the administrator directly with the error message you are receiving. Thanks Q _ From: Kyle Quillen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:36 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blo

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Adam Cantwell
Warren Melnick wrote: Do you have a properly formatted SPF record in place for your domain? W On Nov 12, 2007 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Whom ever helps you will ultimately help me as well. Not only do I

RE: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Kyle Quillen
Yes this passes on all tests that I have ran. _ From: Warren Melnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:29 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking Do you have a properly formatted SPF record

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Warren Melnick
Do you have a properly formatted SPF record in place for your domain? W On Nov 12, 2007 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whom ever helps you will ultimately help me as well. Not only do I have > this > problem with yahoo but email to hotmail just plain disappears. Not even

Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Whom ever helps you will ultimately help me as well. Not only do I have this problem with yahoo but email to hotmail just plain disappears. Not even a bounce and nothing in their bulk/spam folders either. Mike On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:17:50 -0500, Kyle Quillen wrote: > Hello all, > > I have been f

[qmailtoaster] Domain Keys/Yahoo Blocking

2007-11-12 Thread Kyle Quillen
Hello all, I have been fighting a problem with yahoo in that they are deferring all of my mail. Of course I have gone and filled out all of their forms and such but I just cannot seem to figure out what is going on and they for sure are not getting back to me. Anyways I think I have narrowed

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys question from qmail toaster tutorial

2007-03-16 Thread dnk
Well I just added the tutorial. http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/CentOS_4.4_QmailToaster_Install Please have a look over it and let me know if anything looks out of place. d On 3/16/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: dnk wrote: > no id's or anything needed? > > Will check it ou

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys question from qmail toaster tutorial

2007-03-16 Thread Jake Vickers
dnk wrote: no id's or anything needed? Will check it out as soon as I am done it! It's better if you register (takes 2 minutes), but otherwise no. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys question from qmail toaster tutorial

2007-03-16 Thread dnk
no id's or anything needed? Will check it out as soon as I am done it! On 3/16/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: dnk wrote: > Already on it! > > I almost have an updated file for centos 4.4. I was going to submit it > here shortly. Who should i send it to? > > Thanks. The wiki you c

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys question from qmail toaster tutorial

2007-03-16 Thread Jake Vickers
dnk wrote: Already on it! I almost have an updated file for centos 4.4. I was going to submit it here shortly. Who should i send it to? Thanks. The wiki you can edit directly. If you need to attach files to anything, you can send them to me off-list and a brief explanation where they're supp

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys question from qmail toaster tutorial

2007-03-16 Thread dnk
Already on it! I almost have an updated file for centos 4.4. I was going to submit it here shortly. Who should i send it to? On 3/16/07, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: dnk wrote: > Ok, so after following the directions on the wiki pages for the domain > keys, all is now working! > >

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys question from qmail toaster tutorial

2007-03-16 Thread Jake Vickers
dnk wrote: Ok, so after following the directions on the wiki pages for the domain keys, all is now working! Thanks for the help. I guess after following the centos based tutorial, I just "assumed" it worked top to bottom since it has been up since 4.3. My bad. The section on domain keys in it i

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys question from qmail toaster tutorial

2007-03-16 Thread dnk
Ok, so after following the directions on the wiki pages for the domain keys, all is now working! Thanks for the help. I guess after following the centos based tutorial, I just "assumed" it worked top to bottom since it has been up since 4.3. My bad. The section on domain keys in it is missing a

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys question from qmail toaster tutorial

2007-03-15 Thread dnk
Thanks so much for that link! I was following the centos tutorial, and hte domain keys section just had: Make dns entry: BIND - in the your-domain.com zone file (see yourdomain-dk.txt): private._domainkey IN TXT "k=rsa; p=MEwwDQY . . . to end of key" (NOTE QUOTATION

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys question from qmail toaster tutorial

2007-03-15 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
No, like at http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys#bind_2 You should also check out the bits just above it at http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys#Policy_Record and http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Domainkeys#Selector_Record ;) dnk wrote: > As in: > > _domainkey.sq

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys question from qmail toaster tutorial

2007-03-15 Thread Erik A. Espinoza
should be private._domiankey IN TXT "bladfjasdfhakdsj" Erik On 3/15/07, dnk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As in: _domainkey.squirtgun.ca. IN TXT "k=rsa; p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOIxAL4nMo9JqusgWjfLgN7wWTe0Y72m1t6191A4pN9sqr83Pa/k/4zZFa/KlpdcEgjrMQIDAQAB" Or: _domainkey I

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys question from qmail toaster tutorial

2007-03-15 Thread dnk
As in: _domainkey.squirtgun.ca. IN TXT "k=rsa; p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOIxAL4nMo9JqusgWjfLgN7wWTe0Y72m1t6191A4pN9sqr83Pa/k/4zZFa/KlpdcEgjrMQIDAQAB" Or: _domainkey IN TXT "k=rsa; p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOIxAL4nMo9JqusgWjfLgN7wWTe0Y72m1t6191A4pN9sqr83Pa/k/4

Re: [qmailtoaster] domain keys question from qmail toaster tutorial

2007-03-15 Thread Eric \"Shubes\"
Precisely. You should also have a policy record (with simply _domainkey as the record identifier). dnk wrote: > Sorry, the domain in question is: > > squirtgun.ca > > I am new at the domainkeys thing, and was not sure what was reliant. > > In my zone file (bind) I have: > > ; Domain Keys > pr

  1   2   >