[qmailtoaster] eMPF

Hi,How i can Add The eMPF Support in Qmail Toaster.http://www.inter7.com/?page=3Dempf-installRegardsDevendra

[qmailtoaster] empf

Hi,   when empf is including in the package of qmail-toaster Packages   thanks   Daniel         Hola,   Cuando podrá estar incluido el paquete empf en qmail-toaster.   Gracias   Daniel  

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF

Hello Devendra, I assume you mean this page http://www.inter7.com/?page=empf-install This requires patching the qmail package itself. You can't just add this to the QmailToaster. If you require this functionality, you will basically have to make major modifications to QmailToaster or roll your ow

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF

I didn´t tried it, but it seems a quite good add-on to QT! We are seeing more and more messages about blocking particular accounts or domains. Maybe this is a good solution. Salutti Natalio. On 1/9/06, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Devendra, > > I assume you mean this page > ht

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf

Daniel R. Hdez Leal wrote: Hi,   when empf is including in the package of qmail-toaster Packages   thanks   Daniel       You'd have to build it in yourself. You're the first person that's ever asked for it, so it's never really been considered an option to be ad

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf

Ok, for de moment i patch qmail toaster source for use this package.   thanks   Daniel - Original Message - From: Jake Vickers To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 11:09 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] empf Daniel R. Hdez Leal

[qmailtoaster] empf issue?

Hi all, On Tuesday Sept 1, I downloaded and installed the qmail-toaster updates via qtp new-model. It had been several months since I had upgraded. I do not remember what packages were downloaded and upgraded. I am running CentOS 4.7(final) 32 bit Linux. Is there a way to find out what packages wo

[qmailtoaster] empf help

hello friends how to achieve the following using empf i want to prevent misuse of my mail servers by means of masquerading -- ie user authenticates as user @ domain_on_my_server.com plus password but changes the mail from to user @ yahoo.com etc ... i had several incidences of such a kind of spam

[qmailtoaster] eMPF question

Olá list, I have a question about eMPF patch. Is possible to apply policies on only one account of my domain? I need policy to one account restrict to send and receive mail’s only to my domain. If is possible send me a rule to this.

[qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

Hi list, I've made this patch for 1.3.14 with support for Inter7's eMPF. I've seen some discussion on the list but no patches. So here it goes. It's been working fine on my server's AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.3.14.tar.bz2 Description: Binary data -

[qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

Anyone can provide the eMPF patch for the qmailtoaster iso? Thanks!!

[qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

Hi, Am trying to install the eMPF patch via the instructions in the wiki http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Installing_EMPF_patch But the link to the source rpm qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15.src.rpm is unavailable. Neither am I able to locate the same or later as the case maybe anywhere else. Thank

[qmailtoaster] empF patch

Hi all. I just upgraded my qmail-toaster package using qtp-newmodel. Everything seems to be working properly, except for empF. I assume not enough of us are using this to include it? Anyway, I then went to the wiki and followed the instructions on patching qmail-toaster. When I got to step 4

[qmailtoaster] empf policy question

hi i have 6 users belonging to a single domain abc.com user1 to us...@abc.com the company abc.com needs a restriction that these 6 users shall send and receive external emails (R and E) in empf to only 290 different domains that are specified. and these 6 users can send receive emails internal

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf issue?

d...@acbsco.com wrote: Hi all, On Tuesday Sept 1, I downloaded and installed the qmail-toaster updates via qtp new-model. It had been several months since I had upgraded. I do not remember what packages were downloaded and upgraded. I am running CentOS 4.7(final) 32 bit Linux. Is there a way to

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf issue?

Thanks Jake. At this time I really just wanted to know if anything changed with eMPF with regards to qmail-toaster. I understand that I haven't given much information here. I need to be able to understand what is happening before I can attempt to describe it here. I plan to do some more troubleshoo

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf issue?

In /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/ you'll see: .) the log/ directory, which contains every build log that's been done. .) the SRPMS/ directory. While you've removed the .src.rpm files, there are also newmodel-list-mmdd-hhmmss.txt files, which contain the package list for the upgrade that was selected

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf issue?

Thanks for the response Eric. First off - the qmail-toaster upgrade did not stomp on my original working eMPF file. :) Secondly, I looked in the backups directory and all the files contained in the /var/qmail/control directory get backed up. You may not need to tweak anything in the qtp-newmodel s

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf issue?

d...@acbsco.com wrote: Now if I go to domainA.com and fill out the "contact us" form giving my email address as someu...@domainb.com and opt to receive a copy of the email, this is where it breaks. The webmas...@domaina.com receives an email, but someu...@domaina.com never does. Looking in the /

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf help

Rajesh, I don't think empf can help with your issue. empf  defines who an authenticated user can send and receive emails to and from. Since the user is authenticating, empf will not help. Are you sure the email is being sent from your server? Can you actually see the email going out through y

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf issue?

Thanks Jake. Ok I added the NOP0FCHECK to each line in my tcp.smtp file and compiled tcp.smtp cdb. 127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="",DKSIGN="/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1" 192.168.105.:allow,SENDER_NOCHECK="1",RELAYCLIENT="",RBLSMTPD="",NOP0FCHECK="1" 192.168.5.20:allow

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf issue?

spamdyke's detailed logging facility is sweet. It logs the full session much like recordio, but puts each session in its own file so it's a lot easier to find what you're interested in. Also easier to turn on and off. FWIW d...@acbsco.com wrote: Thanks Jake. Ok I added the NOP0FCHECK to each

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf help

Have you changed the password for the compromised user? d...@acbsco.com wrote: Rajesh, I don't think empf can help with your issue. empf defines who an /authenticated/ user can send and receive emails to and from. Since the user is authenticating, empf will not help. Are you sure the email

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf help

Eric, I think this is the person you were referring to on the development list regarding the 127. hole. Rajesh, you may want to review Eric's post on the development list with subject "squirrelmail, tcp configuration tweaks". If you use spamdyke, this may help. Dave Eric Shubert wrote: > Have you

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf issue?

Everything about it is simple and easy (only not gui). Setting up differing configurations for different domains is a little tricky, but that's about the toughest thing you'd do with it, and it's rarely needed. qtp-install-spamdyke does all of the work for you. Read the wiki page (http://wiki.

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf issue?

Thanks Eric. I am not currently using spamdyke. It seems as though many on this list are. I will have to review spamdyke docs and decide if it is right for my implementation. Are you saying spamdyke is easy to turn on/off or just it's logging? I don't want to install spamdyke if it is difficult / t

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf help

hi yes i am positive that all the spam was sent thru my server. this company has a office server with fetchmail, around 300 users aliased to a catchall account. some spammer hacked into their server, put a script which shot of spam email and landed my server blacklisted by barracudanetworks and

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf help

That sounds pretty nasty. Changing the password and using iptables to block are the only mechanisms I'm aware of in the toaster. Making the 'from' address adhere to certain rules seems reasonable to me. I would think that eMPF would have such a thing, but on first glance I don't see that it do

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf help

Rajesh M wrote: hello friends how to achieve the following using empf i want to prevent misuse of my mail servers by means of masquerading -- ie user authenticates as user @ domain_on_my_server.com plus password but changes the mail from to user @ yahoo.com etc ... i had several incidences of s

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF question

Diego Pivetta - Sysmo Informática wrote: Olá list, I have a question about eMPF patch. Is possible to apply policies on only one account of my domain? I need policy to one account restrict to send and receive mail’s only to my domain. If is possible send me a rule to thi

[qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

Ok, i read someone on this list (sorry i don't remember who nor the exact thread) attempting to policying two domains (i think he was trying to configure one without the posibility of sending mails outside the domain or something like that) Inter7 guys have something called EMPF for policying thi

[qmailtoaster] eMPF policy advice

Hi all, I would like to use empf policy for my QT server. I'm hosting 2 domains in one box. abc.com.my is specialize for external & internal email service, but abc.com is specially for internal usage only. I've set policy under /var/qmail/control/policy as below: abc.com:LIre; But, when I us

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

Have you tested this with SRS enabled? I can imagine that this will have serious issues when rewriting is being done. On 3/12/07, AM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi list, I've made this patch for 1.3.14 with support for Inter7's eMPF. I've seen some discussion on the list but no patches. So h

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

uot;Erik A. Espinoza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 6:24 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch Have you tested this with SRS enabled? I can imagine that this will have serious issues when rewriting is being done. On 3/12/07, AM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

2008/9/12 Ho Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Anyone can provide the eMPF patch for the qmailtoaster iso? > Thanks!! > > > Hi, I did the original patch for the toaster but I don't use QMT ISO. But I bealive you can get the source for qmail-toaster and the path, compile it and replace the QMT ISO package

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

A M wrote: 2008/9/12 Ho Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Anyone can provide the eMPF patch for the qmailtoaster iso? Thanks!! Hi, I did the original patch for the toaster but I don't use QMT ISO. But I bealive you can get the source for qmail-toaster and the path,

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

It is so difficult for me to compile the patch for qmailtoaster. Can you give me the patch file for 1.3.15 version of toaster? Thanks Ho On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A M wrote: > > > 2008/9/12 Ho Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Anyone can provide the e

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

Ho Ho wrote: It is so difficult for me to compile the patch for qmailtoaster. Can you give me the patch file for 1.3.15 version of toaster? Not sure what you want - the patches included with Qmailtoaster are located in the .src.rpm file. If you're asking for the patch for the empf patch, I

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

Hi, you can get the patch here: http://www.mail-archive.com/qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com/msg14117.html Just follow the instrutions - they are also in the wiki: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Installing_EMPF_patch 2008/9/22 Ho Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It is so difficult for me to

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

Thanks AM. I search it for a long time on mail-archive by using "empf" and I cannot find it. I saw on wiki that you have a patch for 1.3.15 and no need for me to compile. So I searched it on mail-archive and I cannot find it. The patch is locate at a mail talking about "vqadmin". I think it woul

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Ho Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks AM. I search it for a long time on mail-archive by using "empf" and > I cannot find it. > I saw on wiki that you have a patch for 1.3.15 and no need for me to > compile. > > So I searched it on mail-archive and I cannot fi

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

Natalio Gatti wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Ho Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Thanks AM. I search it for a long time on mail-archive by using > "empf" and I cannot find it. > > I saw on wiki that you have a patch for 1.3.15 and no nee

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

That was an older version. I've updated to wiki to reflect the current version. All current packages are always available at http://www.qmailtoaster.org. Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote: Hi, Am trying to install the eMPF patch via the instructions in the wiki http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/I

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

Thanks. I have one question though. Will I be able to install the 'A. M. patch for QT version' to the later version of the the src rpm? Thank you Ashraf On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: > That was an older version. I've updated to wiki to reflect the current > version. All cur

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch

I don't see a problem. The only change to the newer QT version was to add support for newer Fedora versions. There's no real functional difference. Khan Mohamed Ashraf wrote: Thanks. I have one question though. Will I be able to install the 'A. M. patch for QT version' to the later version of

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Dave Hallowell wrote: Hi all. I just upgraded my qmail-toaster package using qtp-newmodel. Everything seems to be working properly, except for empF. I assume not enough of us are using this to include it? Anyway, I then went to the wiki and followed the instructions on patching qmail-toaster

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

2009/4/6 Jake Vickers : > Dave Hallowell wrote: >> >> Hi all. >> I just upgraded my qmail-toaster package using qtp-newmodel. Everything >> seems to be working properly, except for empF. I assume not enough of us are >> using this to include it? >> >> Anyway, I then went to the wiki and followed th

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Thanks for the replies. Sorry, I missed the post from March 5, 2009 regarding my exact problem. Since I haven't figured out how to "just add the patch to the patching section of the spec file". I will spend some time learning how to add the patch, or I will wait for AM to update the patch. I

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Hi all, I took a little time and read about diff and patch and learned something new today. I was able to add the patch to the spec file no problem. When I run rpmbuild -bb --rebuild --with 'cnt40' qmail-toaster.spec I get error: Failed dependencies:   openssl-devel >= 0.9.8 is needed b

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Dave Hallowell wrote: Hi all, I took a little time and read about diff and patch and learned something new today. I was able to add the patch to the spec file no problem. When I run rpmbuild -bb --rebuild --with 'cnt40' qmail-toaster.spec I get error: Failed dependencies: openssl-de

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Jake, .rpm I am following the Installing EMPF patch on the qmail wiki. I patched the spec file (step 4) manually like you suggested. I got the errors when performing step 5 - rebuild your qmail-toaster rpmbuild -bb --rebuild --with 'cnt40' qmail-toaster.spec Thanks, Dave Jake Vickers wrote:

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Dave Hallowell wrote: Jake, .rpm I am following the Installing EMPF patch on the qmail wiki. I patched the spec file (step 4) manually like you suggested. I got the errors when performing step 5 - rebuild your qmail-toaster rpmbuild -bb --rebuild --with 'cnt40' qmail-toaster.spec Thanks, Dave

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

I'm guessing here, but it appears that the patch requires newer versions of these packages than the versions you have installed. Have you tried # yum update openssl-devel krb5-devel ? If cos4.4 doesn't have recent enough versions, you might use the --enablerepo=rpmforge parameter with the yum

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Eric, I tried using yum --enablerepo=rpmforge list available openssl-devel krb5-devel just to see what was available and then I tried yum list available openssl-devel krb5-devel and both returned the same exact versions. openssl-devel = 0.9.7a-43.17.el4_7.2 and krb5-devel = 1.3.4-60.el4 neith

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Yeah, go Jake's route. Dave Hallowell wrote: Eric, I tried using yum --enablerepo=rpmforge list available openssl-devel krb5-devel just to see what was available and then I tried yum list available openssl-devel krb5-devel and both returned the same exact versions. openssl-devel = 0.9.7a-43.

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Jake Vickers wrote: Dave Hallowell wrote: Jake, .rpm I am following the Installing EMPF patch on the qmail wiki. I patched the spec file (step 4) manually like you suggested. I got the errors when performing step 5 - rebuild your qmail-toaster rpmbuild -bb --rebuild --with 'cnt40

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Dave Hallowell wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: Dave Hallowell wrote: Jake, .rpm I am following the Installing EMPF patch on the qmail wiki. I patched the spec file (step 4) manually like you suggested. I got the errors when performing step 5 - rebuild your qmail-toaster rpmbuild -bb --rebuild -

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Jake Vickers wrote: Dave Hallowell wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: Dave Hallowell wrote: Jake, .rpm I am following the Installing EMPF patch on the qmail wiki. I patched the spec file (step 4) manually like you suggested. I got the errors when perfo

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Dave Hallowell wrote: Glad to hear it worked. Now that you have the spec file patched, you can create a new patch for others so they do not have to go through the same process. Move the patched spec file to a new name, and then install the .src.rpm again. Then from the SOURCES dir run: diff

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Jake Vickers wrote: Dave Hallowell wrote: Glad to hear it worked. Now that you have the spec file patched, you can create a new patch for others so they do not have to go through the same process. Move the patched spec file to a new name, and then install the .src.rpm again. Then from the SO

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Eric Shubert wrote: Why is it that empF is not included in the stock toaster? Seems like a nice feature to me. Because Erik froze development on the 1.3 branch almost 2 years ago to make time for the new version. I've been holding with this and concentrating on the 2.0 branch - once the

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Jake Vickers wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Why is it that empF is not included in the stock toaster? Seems like a nice feature to me. Because Erik froze development on the 1.3 branch almost 2 years ago to make time for the new version. I've been holding with this and concentrating on the 2

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Jake Vickers wrote: Dave Hallowell wrote: Glad to hear it worked. Now that you have the spec file patched, you can create a new patch for others so they do not have to go through the same process. Move the patched spec file to a new name, and then install the .src.rpm agai

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Dave Hallowell wrote: Jake Vickers wrote: Dave Hallowell wrote: Glad to hear it worked. Now that you have the spec file patched, you can create a new patch for others so they do not have to go through the same process. Move the patched spec file to a n

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

2009/4/8 Dave Hallowell : > > Dave Hallowell wrote: > > Jake Vickers wrote: > > Dave Hallowell wrote: > > Glad to hear it worked. Now that you have the spec file patched, you can > create a new patch for others so they do not have to go through the same > process. Move the patched spec file to a ne

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

A M wrote: Hi all, I miss the most of the comotion arround eMPF (work...) but I've to point out the following: The eMPF patch in itself should always apply error free in any netqmail based qmail. There are some issues with SRS, mainly because rules DO NOT take it in cosideration... (code

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Jake Vickers wrote: A M wrote: Hi all, I miss the most of the comotion arround eMPF (work...) but I've to point out the following: The eMPF patch in itself should always apply error free in any netqmail based qmail. There are some issues with SRS, mainly because rules DO NOT take it in

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Jake Vickers wrote: > A M wrote: > >> >> Hi all, >> >> I miss the most of the comotion arround eMPF (work...) but I've to >> point out the following: >> >> The eMPF patch in itself should always apply error free in any >> netqmail based qmail. >> >> There are som

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Dave Hallowell wrote: How long have you been running the patch? I'm just loathe to add a patch that I really don't have time to trouble shoot at this point, especially if it has not been tested in length and make cause issues with other things. Once thing I've learned programming in Linux, P

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

Hi Jake, that would be correct. I created the empf patch yesterday and placed into production yesterday. That was my very first attempt at creating the patch. It is by no means stable. I was simply following your suggestion to make it available to others. I understand and do not expect you t

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

2009/4/8 Jake Vickers : > A M wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I miss the most of the comotion arround eMPF (work...) but I've to >> point out the following: >> >>  The eMPF patch in itself should always apply error free in any >> netqmail based qmail. >> >>  There are some issues with SRS, mainly becaus

RE: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

...@gmail.com] Enviada: quinta-feira, 9 de Abril de 2009 11:38 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch 2009/4/8 Jake Vickers : > A M wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I miss the most of the comotion arround eMPF (work...) but I'

Re: [qmailtoaster] empF patch

-Mensagem original- Hi, I've been running the patch in QMT since late 2005 without any problems up to the date. -- I've been using this patch since December 2007 without any problems in a basic QMT system with less than 100 accounts. It requires some minor tweaks to the webmail (in my

Re: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

i agree ^^, for time being is possible to install eMPF manualy ? Ok, i read someone on this list (sorry i don't remember who nor the exact thread) attempting to policying two domains (i think he was trying to configure one without the posibility of sending mails outside the domain or something

Re: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

licy tool too.. Cheers - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 3:07 AM Subject: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying Ok, i read someone on this list (sorry i don't remember who nor the exact thread) attempting to policying two doma

Fw: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

licy tool too.. Cheers - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 3:07 AM Subject: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying Ok, i read someone on this list (sorry i don't remember who nor the exact thread) attempting to policying two doma

RE: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

ers today. > > Is there any possiblities that this can be integrated in our > qmail-toaster?? This would be a good policy tool too.. > > Cheers > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 3:07 AM > Subject: [qmai

Fw: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

> Hi,>> I was trying to configure this kind of policy. I send a thread with title > Control Sending Externally & Locally...>> This is a policy which are looking by many of the customers today.>> Is there any possiblities that this can be integrated in our > qmail-toaster?? This would be a good poli

Re: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

Hi, I've been using EMPF for some time and works fine... as long as YOU don't mess it up. It currently handles about 20 domains with arround 30 to 40 policies each. It's quite fast doing it too. I've patched the current qmailtoaster release (1.3.6). I, for one would like it for be part of the

Re: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

Hi Zsoft, Could you guide me how to install EMPF on qmailtoaster Thanks in Advance toni Hi, I've been using EMPF for some time and works fine... as long as YOU don't mess it up. It currently handles about 20 domains with arround 30 to 40 policies each. It's quite fast doing it too. I'v

Re: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

Hi I've made a path to the current toaster just "rpm -i qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.6.scr.rpm" go to /usr/src/packages/SPECS and copy or patch the qmail-toaster.spec from the tarball then copy the qmail-empf.patch.bz2 to /usr/src/packages/SOURCES and rebuild the source with "rpmbuild -bs usr/src/p

Re: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

already working or not? toni - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:41 PM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying Hi I've made a path to the current toaster just "rpm -i qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.6.scr.rpm" go to /u

Re: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

--- Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:41 PM > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying > > > > Hi > > > > I've made a path to the current toaster > > > > just "rpm -

Re: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

ild -bs /usr/src/.../SPECS/qmail-toaster.spec BACKUP /var/qmail/ stop qmail rpm -Uhv /usr/src/.../RPM/i686/qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.6.rpm start qmail and it should be done toni - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:41 PM Subject: R

Re: [qmailtoaster] EMPF Mail Policying

; >> cp qmail-toaster.spec to /usr/src/.../SPECS >> >> cp qmail-empf.patch.bz2 to /usr/src/../SOURCES >> >> rpmbuild -bs /usr/src/.../SPECS/qmail-toaster.spec >> >> BACKUP /var/qmail/ >> >> stop qmail >> >> rpm -Uhv /usr/src/.../RPM/i686/

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF policy advice

Hey Gabriel, I'm not familiar with empf. Is that something which comes with the toaster, or have you added it on? Any info about it? Gabriel Lai wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to use empf policy for my QT server. I'm hosting 2 domains > in one box. abc.com.my is specialize for external & inte

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF policy advice

more infor can be found here: http://www.qmailwiki.org/EMPF It's one of the plugin for QT, integrated already. - Original Message From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 11:11:57 PM S

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF policy advice

ster-list@qmailtoaster.com > Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 11:11:57 PM > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF policy advice > > Hey Gabriel, > > I'm not familiar with empf. Is that something which comes with the toaster, > or have you added it on? Any info about it? > > Gab

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF policy advice

Hi ES, Looks like a very nice patch. Unfortunately, it's not (yet) included in the toaster. It appears that it would be a good fit for the toaster though. Please create an enhancement request at http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/. I can't think of a reason why it wouldn't be included eventu

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF policy advice

Erik A. Espinoza wrote: > Hi ES, > >> Looks like a very nice patch. Unfortunately, it's not (yet) included >> in the >> toaster. It appears that it would be a good fit for the toaster though. >> Please create an enhancement request at >> http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/flyspray/. I can't think of a

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF policy advice

" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 7:28:39 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF policy advice Erik A. Espinoza wrote: > Hi ES, > >> Looks like a very nice patch. Unfortunately, it's not (yet) included >> in the >>

[qmailtoaster] empf patch (Off Topic)

I'm sending this mail to this list becouse it seems that a couple of qToaster's have implemented the empf patch successfully. Yesterday I test an installation of the empf patch provided by A M. I could patch, build and install the new qmail-toaster rpm correctly. I created a file named policy in /v

[qmailtoaster] eMPF patch for 1.3.16

Hi all, Here follows the patch with some changes and with a simple aply-me script (empf.sh). Test in a non production server first, but if it builds it should work just fine. -- AM agmsoft(at)gmail.com eMPF for qmailtoaster README Place this files to where you downloaded src.rpm. run empf.sh

[qmailtoaster] eMPF requires authentication to work?

Hello list, I have been using eMPF for about one year now and it does a great job limiting email accounts and/or who they can send or receive emails from. Thanks for including it in the distribution. I have noticed that eMPF requires that the user sending the email authenticates (otherwise how wo

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf patch (Off Topic)

Hi, Natalio I've replied in the empf list... dindn't see this one. check it As for information: The policy patch by default enforces auth in every smtp, so only authenticated users can send email. This can be change in the conf file for the policies prior to compile but IS NOT recomended has i

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf patch (Off Topic)

A M: Thanks! You're right, with authentication enabled everything works fine. I have to give a shot to the compile option, becouse I have 200 clients configured without smtp-auth (they are users inside a company). I'll post the results of the recompilation. Natalio. On Nov 19, 2007 12:53 PM, A M

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf patch (Off Topic)

I'm sending this mail to let everyone know that the recompilation was succesfull. I could disable the auth-requirement and now users without authentication are included in the policy. I know it is a risk becouse it is easy to forge the sender email, but that's something i could live with until I re

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf patch (Off Topic)

Natalio Gatti wrote: I'm sending this mail to let everyone know that the recompilation was succesfull. I could disable the auth-requirement and now users without authentication are included in the policy. I know it is a risk becouse it is easy to forge the sender email, but that's something i c

Re: [qmailtoaster] empf patch (Off Topic)

On Nov 22, 2007 2:49 PM, Jake Vickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Natalio Gatti wrote: > > I'm sending this mail to let everyone know that the recompilation was > succesfull. I could disable the auth-requirement and now users without > authentication are included in the policy. > I know it is a

Re: [qmailtoaster] eMPF patch for 1.3.16

A.M. I have installed your patch for empf using empf.sh. It is currently running fine. However, when I installed the rpm's with  rpm -Uvh --replacefiles --replacepkgs qmail-toaster*.rpm qmail-pop3d*.rpm   I got the same warning as I got with my patch. warning: package qmail-pop3d-toaster = 1.03

  1   2   >