Correct me if I'm wrong, but was it not at least partially because of such
new media and the mixing of electronic with other characteristics (such as
audio or visual materials) (especially materials on the Internet) that
actually began this whole movement toward a new set of rules other than
AACR2?
Yep, there's no way to know.
It seems to me that there needs to be an additional vocabulary term
added to legal ones in 338 that describes a playaway somehow. It might
not _specifically_ identify a playaway(tm), you might need to look in
non-controlled fields to see that still. But there shou
My concern is that if you have
336 spoken word $2 rdacontent
337 audio $2 rdamedia
338 other $2 rda carrier
How do they know that that this thing is a Playaway, unless you say it's a
Playaway in the 300? And for matching, you must have consistency. Even for
human beings, we need consi
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> One idea is if perhaps the matching algorithm could use the new 3xx fields
> instead of the 300 "type of unit" free text. Of course, that relies on the
> new 3xx fields using only controlled terms, which I'm not sure is the case
> (but should be!).
Assuming 3xx is limi
On 4/22/2011 3:30 PM, Deborah Fritz wrote:
People *will* be entering free text as this RDA element, so I would like to
know whether anyone has figured out some way that matching algorythms will
be able to reliably match descriptions without the use of consistent terms
in this element.
No, and n
nd Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Amanda Xu
> *Sent:* Friday, April 22, 2011 12:44 PM
>
> *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> *Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] Cataloging playaways
>
>
>
> Julie and Ed:
>
>
>
> Here is what I would do for
ource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Amanda Xu
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 12:44 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Cataloging playaways
Julie and Ed:
Here is what I would do for cross-mapping between ONIX 2.1 & MARC 21
cons
And herein lies my point ... I am seeking consistency!
Julie
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Deborah Fritz
wrote:
> But what you do in the local catalog, does *not* actually stay in the
> local catalog, because records get batchloaded to WorldCat and other union
> catalogs (or catalogues) and
-Original Message-
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description
> and Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Rochkind
> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 3:06 PM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Cataloging pla
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> I thought that RDA as a code used neither GMD _nor_ SMD, replacing those with
> the data elements that end up in the new mac 3xx fields? Can anyone confirm
> that, that there is no notion of 'smd' in RDA?
The 300 $a includes what could be called an SMD, but in RDA it
scription and Access
[RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] on behalf of Deborah Fritz
[debo...@marcofquality.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 2:52 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Cataloging playaways
But what you do in the local catalog, does not actually stay in the local
catalog,
But what you do in the local catalog, does not actually stay in the local
catalog, because records get batchloaded to WorldCat and other union
catalogs (or catalogues) and, when that happens, what then will happen with
the matching algorythms for deduping records if each record has a different
SMD?
e Description and Access
> [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Julie Moore
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 21, 2011 5:07 PM
>
> *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
> *Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] Cataloging playaways
>
>
>
> Ed,
>
> Are you saying that you would ca
rom: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Julie Moore
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 5:07 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Cataloging playaways
Ed,
Are you saying that you would call it a:
3
Ed,
Are you saying that you would call it a:
300 1 pre-recorded MP3 player ?
Just curious!
Thanks,
Julie
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Ed Jones wrote:
> FWIW, ONIX calls it a "pre-recorded MP3 player", which also seems to be the
> name used in the marketplace, if a Google search I jus
t you
want to your users.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of John Hostage
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 7:20 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Cataloging
half Of Ed Jones
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 18:13
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Cataloging playaways
FWIW, ONIX calls it a "pre-recorded MP3 player", which also seems to be the
name used in the marketplace, if a Google search I just did is any indication
(1.
Robert Maxwell said:
>In the 300 field we used "1 sound media player ...", the same as had
>been used previously in AACR2. I see the non-BYU RDA records for
>Playaways used "1 audio media player ..." which is probably more in
>the spirit of RDA, which changed most of the "sound" SMDs to "audio".
>
source Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Mark Ehlert
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 11:55 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Cataloging playaways
Julie Moore wrote:
As long as we are looking a
lf Of Robert Maxwell
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:57 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Cataloging playaways
A few explanations about BYU's RDA records for Playaways.
In the 300 field we used "1 sound media player ...", the same as had been used
previou
ee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
(801)422-5568
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Mark Ehlert
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 11:55 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.G
Julie Moore wrote:
> As long as we are looking at cataloging kits using RDA, I am also wondering
> if people have cataloged playaways using RDA? (Is there a way to search
> specifically for playaways with RDA records on OCLC?)
dx:rda and kw:playaway? brought up a few records. It looks like
Brigh
22 matches
Mail list logo
