Alan Shutko wrote:
>
> Kevin Vajk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > 8^) Do you have a link to any info on it somewhere?
> >
> > Not really, other than the man pages on UNIX systems. It is
> > (or at least will be) part of POSIX, which is why I think we
> > should have it.
>
> Ick! It's cpi
Alan Shutko wrote:
>
> Kevin Vajk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There appears to be BSD-licensed code in FreeBSD we
> > could use, and some people claim (although I disagree)
> > that it's the new archiving standard.
>
> How can it be the new archiving standard if I've never heard of it.
>
JF Martinez wrote:
>
> Linux would have not been possible without the Gnu utilities and the
> compiler used to built has ever been gcc. What would have been of
> Linux if Gcc didn't exist? What of its performance if Gcc had been
> mediocre? The only other 32 bits compiler I am aware of who was
Damien Miller wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Diego Pons wrote:
>
> > > Of course, most Linux people object just as vehemently to the GNU
> > > people's presumptiveness on this account. I happen to agree with these
> > > Linux people.
> >
> > Would you care to elaborate? I've read GNU's argument
Svante Signell wrote:
[Forwarded from RMS]
>
> Many of you are aware that the GNU Project objects to this. If you've
> heard about this from other people, you may have heard an inaccurate
> rendition of the reasons why; people who disagree and those who
> support us often oversimplify them. See
Hi,
I have used the following configuration for sendmail with good results;
I would recommend mimicing it:
1. Move *all* the sendmail configuration files to /etc/mail. If
necessary, symlink /etc/sendmail.cf -> /etc/mail/sendmail.cf, but I
think this is a compile-time option for sendmail.
2. Pu
John Summerfield wrote:
>
> 2 Where's the man page for mkfs.ext2?
>
"man mkfs" or "man mke2fs". "mkfs.ext2" is an alias that is really
intended to be called by "mkfs".
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Kevin Waterson wrote:
> >
> > But, the matter in hand.
> > cgi is on the way out and the smart money is on php (see www.php.net)
> > you ned to use the php module
> >
> > Then, you need only to use a line like
> >
> > Hello World
> >
> >
> >
> >
I think CGI, PHP, mod_perl and custom Apache mod
John Summerfield wrote:
>
> >
> > > Don't you wish we could talk bios makers into leaving DOS days behind and
> > > getting into the 1990s at least before 2000. This whole
> > > primary/extended/logical partition garbage should have died years ago.
>
> I don't care if it dies on two of the four
Chris Abbey wrote:
>
> At 19:14 11/14/99 +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> >Disk /dev/hda: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 1108 cylinders
> >Units = sectors of 512 bytes, counting from 0
> >
> > Device BootStart End #sectors Id System
> >/dev/hda163 32129 32067 83 Linux
"James M. Rogers" wrote:
>
> Probably not,
>
> This would probably still violate some sort of patent that RSA has covering
> public key encrytion. Probably best to avoid for now til the RSA patent
> expires and some other companies successfully win a court case against RSA.
> Also it would ma
Chris Abbey wrote:
>
> At 17:38 11/8/99 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >The problem is that for DHCP, the configuration can change *at any
> >time*. Unlike BOOTP, where you get a configuration at one point and
> >that's it, with DHCP you need to be able to cha
Chris Abbey wrote:
>
> At 15:05 11/8/99 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >This is true, and that's a valid request. Service information exported
> >via DHCP needs to get around.
> >
> >However, something we should think about would be if there is a better
> &
JF Martinez wrote:
> >
> > Isn't this something that should get fixed in Samba, rather than pump?
> >
>
> Yes. But I still would like pump making for Wins servers what it does
> about DNS servers: find them and put the right value in the right
> place. This is DHCP, or Pump work not Samba's
>
JF Martinez wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Pump does a magnificent job for people who have to set their
> > networking interfaces throughg DHCP. And it works on Token Rings
> > despite what the doc says about not sure it works on it.
> >
> > Now Samba does not work if I don't add the interfaces=myipnumber
Matthew Campbell wrote:
>
> H. Peter Anvin writes:
> > Either way, rc.local should be for *local* stuff. Just like /usr/local,
> > it should be *empty*.
>
> I suppose the code that makes an issue file with the Red hat release
> and kernel version could go in a sc
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > > In RH6.1 it looks like you can simply overwrite /etc/rc.d/rc.local;
> > > > don't know if that's true for other RedHats.
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > In RH6.1 it looks like you can simply overwrite /etc/rc.d/rc.local;
> > don't know if that's true for other RedHats.
>
> Yup, just change where it munges the issue file in rc.local.
&g
Kevin Waterson wrote:
>
> "H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
>
> > Al Elia wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I'm a FreeBSD guy who's new to Linux...and I need to be able to compile my
> > > kernel with specific colors
Al Elia wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm a FreeBSD guy who's new to Linux...and I need to be able to compile my
> kernel with specific colors (bright white text on a black background).
> Anywone know where/how this is done in the linux kernel source?
>
> Thanks!
>
Put the relevant escape codes i
Kevin Vajk wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > >
> > > Patent issues. RSA would complain loudly, IIRC.
> > >
> >
> > Not for distribution; you can link OpenSSL against RSAREF and get
> &g
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > Some cryptographic library
> > Some cryptographic Perl modules
> > openssl
> > apache-mod_ssl
> > lsh (freeware ssh)
>
> Where ca
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> H. Peter Anvin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > openssl
> > apache-mod_ssl
>
> Patent issues. RSA would complain loudly, IIRC.
>
Not for distribution; you can link OpenSSL against RSAREF and get
something that is legal fo
Since RedHat now has a "domestic" (crypto-enabled) version, it would
make sense to add a few packages:
Some cryptographic library
Some cryptographic Perl modules
openssl
apache-mod_ssl
lsh (freeware ssh)
God willing, this version won't have to remain "dome
John DeDourek wrote:
>
> I don't have a solution. I do agree that it is useful for the printing
> system to automatically identify files and treat them with the
> appropriate
> filter. It is good to have the "file" utility make a guess as to file
> type. I don't like the idea of having a separ
Kevin Waterson wrote:
>
> >
> > > 2) Move to 2 CDs distribution: it's definitely time to do it. It's
>
> This would be a major problem for network installs
>
Not particularly. Just copy or link all the files into a single tree.
A link farm doesn't take that much space.
-hpa
--
To
Li Bing-QCH1550 wrote:
>
> I have a proposal as follows. Please give me some advice.
>
> You may have heard of ISP (Internet Service Provider) and ICP (Internet
> Content Provider). I think maybe it shall exist a new Internet provider,
> IFP. Here the F means Function. With the IFP's help, every
Chris Abbey wrote:
>
> >sorry for my ignorance, but aren't PGP signatures included in every RPM ?
> >I think when you are installing the rpm the rpm verifies the signature.
>
> every RPM *can* be PGP signed... not all are.
> rpm *can* verify the signature of a signed RPM, *IFF* you have pgp inst
Damien Miller wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 2 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Mandrake currently has something similar to this. Its a very very
> > nice feature. It will poll mirrors close to you for updates, and you
> > can install them right fr
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > So, in closing, no, I haven't gotten an answer and am entering this into
> > bugzilla as I type. I'd like to see this resolved as it's quite annoying
> > to think that if the hurricane knocks power out for >8 hours, my IP will
> > likely change :(
>
> In theory it shouldnt
Kevin Waterson wrote:
>
> Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> > > one thing that the installer didnt do quite right is set up
> > > by windows(sorry) partition in lilo, i could only add the linux
> > > partition, which worked this time.
> >
> > That's right - I've been working on the lilo code today. Look
Matt Wilson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 03:48:24PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > I ran into a similar problem with RedHat before... I had all the RedHat
> > files installed on an unpartitioned disk (/dev/sdb), and the RH
> > installer wouldn't let me ins
Steve Dixon wrote:
>
> the new(0831) rawhide is getting even closer to sweetness with the new
> installer. one thing that the installer didnt do quite right is set up
> by windows(sorry) partition in lilo, i could only add the linux
> partition, which worked this time. usually i chose to instal
"Edward S. Marshall" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > LILO certainly *can* be operated via the serial port (as can SYSLINUX),
> > but it must be enabled in /etc/lilo.conf (or syslinux.cfg).
>
> Right; as I pointed out in my previous
"Edward S. Marshall" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
> > Lilo still comes up via the normal console (the keyboard is disconnected
> > at this point, but I'd prefer to leave a video card in there as a "just in
> > case"); it's completely uncontrollable from the serial con
35 matches
Mail list logo
