As Jason states, make sure you are not using auto-negotiation at all. Hard set
the speed and duplex settings both in the switch and the NIC.
Another item to try is setting both the switch port and the NIC to 100 Half
Duplex. There are serious flow control issues with 100 MB FD Ethernet
Has anyone been able to successfully get Tomcat working with Apache 2x using
mod_jk on a RedHat 9.0 system? I can get Tomcat to work fine in standalone
but for the life of me cannot get mod_jk to work. Has any kind soul created
RPMs of the whole thing?
Thanks in advance for any help,
--Moby
I have a kickstart script that is working fine except for one little
problem. In the post section of the script I am doing a wget to bring some
files over from another box. I noticed that the wget brings the files over
successfully but the filenames on the target box end up with a question mark
Rebecca, how did you install PostGreSQL? Did you install it from the RPM?
--Moby
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Hardy Merrill
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 08:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems starting postgresql in
Kernel headers have been moved into glic-header (or something like that) I
believe.
--Moby
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of David Busby
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 15:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Where can I find
I just built a new RH 8.0 box. I have been trying to build various packages
from their source RPMS and have found two (what I consider quite serious
issues).
1) rpmbuild -ba gcc32.spec does not work on an RH 8.0 box using a standard
RH 8.0 intall with all the development tools installed. I
rpm -qa | grep XXX shows package XXX installed. I need to remove XXX from
the RPM database without making any other changes to the system. In other
words, I just want package XXX to stop from showing up in rpm -qa but I do
not want rpm to uninstall anything from the box. How can this be done?
: Mobeen Azhar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:44 PM
Subject: RPM question
rpm -qa | grep XXX shows package XXX installed. I need to remove XXX from
the RPM database without making any other changes to the system. In other
words, I just want package XXX
Here are the last few lines of the build that show the process bombinh.
Begin screen capture
/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/gcc-3.2-20020903/obj-i586-redhat-linux/i586-redhat-lin
ux/libstdc++-v3/include/i586-redhat-linux/bits/ctype_noninline.h: In
constructor `std::ctypechar::ctype(int*, const short
Thanks for your help so far Edward. You are the only one who has responded
to my postings so far. I guess not too many people on this list build gcc
and glibc from source RPMs.
I agree with you that RedHat's own source RPM should (TM) compile on a
standard RedHat install. I am curious to see
Title: Message
I have a fairly generic install of RedHat 8.0. I
want to build gcc32 from source. So, I downloaded and installed the source
RPM for gcc32 and tried doing a rpmbuild -ba gcc32.spec. However, the
build keeps on failing. Has anyone successfully compiled gcc32 with RedHat
8.0? If
I had a box running RH 7.2 fine. The only quirk that the box had was
that I had to add mem=88M in order to get it to see all the memory in
the box. I had to use the mem=88M parameter even during installation of
RH 7.2 because otherwise it would say something to the effect that there
was not
I am going to be building a new RH 7.2 server with a HPT 370 controller.
After watching the discussion on this list, I have decided not to use
HighPoint's driver for RAID but to use the software RAID that comes with
RH. I have a couple of questions regarding this and would appreciate
any help.
Here are few quick notes of what I just went through trying to resolve
heavy CPU usage by the kswapd process. Hopefully these can help out any
others fighting similar issues:
I have a current RH 7.0 box running kernel 2.2.19. This box was to be
replaced by a RH 7.2 box. I built and patched
Look at cygwin.
--Moby
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Calbazana, Al
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 5:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: XWindows Clients for Win32
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone knows of a good, and free of
Thanks for the reply, Chris. Yes, my run-parts is also in /usr/bin and came
from crontabs-1.8-1.
I changed the script from:
"
#!/bin/bash
# run-parts - concept taken from Debian
# keep going when something fails
set +e
if [ $# -lt 1 ]; then
echo "Usage: run-parts dir"
exit 1
fi
I did try mkinitrd after booting from the floppy to no avail. Same message
about "all loopback devices are in use". However, I compiled the 2.2.17-14
kernel with built-in support for my SCSI and ethernet cards and now
everything works fine.
Thanks for all the help,
--Moby
-Original
, February 14, 2001 2322
To: Redhat-List
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.16-22 to 2.2.17-14 upgrade issues
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Mobeen Azhar spewed into the bitstream:
MAHello all, I upgraded my RH 7.0 machine's kernel from
2.2.16-22 to 2.2.17-14
MAusing binary RPMs from RH. However, since doing that, I
Hello all, I upgraded my RH 7.0 machine's kernel from 2.2.16-22 to 2.2.17-14
using binary RPMs from RH. However, since doing that, I have not been able
to run mkinitrd, it always complains "all loopback devices are in use".
Following suggestions from this list, I tried modprobe loop but it says
Hello all, I upgraded the kernel on my RH 7.0 box from 2.2.16-22 to
2.2.17-14. I successfully installed the following RPMS:
kernel-2.2.17-14.i386.rpm
kernel-pcmcia-cs-2.2.17-14.i386.rpm
kernel-utils-2.2.17-14.i386.rpm
All the RPMS installed without a problem. However, whenever I try to run
, February 14, 2001 1841
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.16-22 to 2.2.17-14 upgrade issues
"Mobeen Azhar" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am pretty sure that my system is fully patched as far as
non-kernel things
go, since I use RH's up2date on a weekly basis. Could an
2.2.16-22 to 2.2.17-14 upgrade issues
Have you ever considered compiling a kernel yourself? :)
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Mobeen Azhar wrote:
Hello all, I upgraded my RH 7.0 machine's kernel from 2.2.16-22
to 2.2.17-14
using binary RPMs from RH. However, since doing that, I have
not been able
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mikkel L. Ellertson
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 1908
To: Redhat-List
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.16-22 to 2.2.17-14 upgrade issues
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Mobeen Azhar wrote:
Hello all, I upgraded my RH 7.0 machine's kernel from 2.2.16-22
Sorry if this is a duplicate, I did not see the first message make it to the
list.
Hello all, I upgraded the kernel on my RH 7.0 box from 2.2.16-22 to
2.2.17-14. I successfully installed the following RPMS:
kernel-2.2.17-14.i386.rpm
kernel-pcmcia-cs-2.2.17-14.i386.rpm
a modprobe loop?
--Moby
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mikkel L. Ellertson
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 1708
To: Redhat-List
Subject: Re: (no subject)
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Mobeen Azhar wrote:
Hello all, I upgraded the kernel
Hello all, I upgraded my RH 7.0 machine's kernel from 2.2.16-22 to 2.2.17-14
using binary RPMs from RH. However, since doing that, I have not been able
to run mkinitrd, it always complains "all loopback devices are in use".
Following suggestions from this list, I tried modprobe loop but it says
Hello all, I upgraded the kernel on my RH 7.0 box from 2.2.16-22 to
2.2.17-14. I successfully installed the following RPMS:
kernel-2.2.17-14.i386.rpm
kernel-pcmcia-cs-2.2.17-14.i386.rpm
kernel-utils-2.2.17-14.i386.rpm
All the RPMS installed without a problem. However, whenever I try to run
Pretty much anything can occurr with auto-negotiate. I have situations
where NICs set to auto-negotiate were changing duplex settings every second
or so. If possible, do not use auto-neogtiate.
--Moby
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
The RPM for sendmail 8.11.x has SMTP AUTH built in.
--Moby
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simons
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 1831
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RPM for Sendmail + SMTP AUTH
Hello,
Is there any
erl source.
K.
Message: 13
From: "Mobeen Azhar" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cyrus IMAPD
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 16:15:01 -0600
charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone installed cyrus-imapd-2.0.6-3 and gotten it to work? I just
, November 26, 2000 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cyrus IMAPD
Assuming you have openssl installed (rpm -q openssl), then
/usr/lib/libssl.so should be what you're looking for.
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 14:52:46 -0600, Mobeen Azhar wrote:
Thanks for the reply Kyrian.
I have the older versions
is in a directory which is listed in that
file.
Assuming you've traced everything back to that level ok, that should
sort you out I guess...
K.
Message: 15
From: "Mobeen Azhar" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cyrus IMAPD
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 15:45:50 -0600
c
Has anyone installed cyrus-imapd-2.0.6-3 and gotten it to work? I just
installed the RPM successfully, no complaints about any dependencies or
anything, but every time I try to execute cyradm, it bombs with the
following error:
Can't load
Hello all, I am a relative newbie to Linux so please excuse me if any of my
statements sound ignorant!
I have a RedHat Linux 6.2 box providing the following services:
1) Apache
2) Cyrus - IMAP
3) Sendmail 8.10 with SMTP auth.
4) TWIG for web based access to the IMAP server.
In order to get
Hello all, I had a few packages that I installed from binary RPMS. Later on
I downloaded the sources for those packages (newer version than what was
available as RPMs), compiled them, and installed them manually. However,
the entries for the RPM still show up in rpm -qa. I would like to
Also I think the mv command will preserve the permissions and ownership of
the original files whil the cp command will not.
--Moby
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Trivass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 0547
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Moving
Well, after long hours spent in front of the machine accompanied with major
hair loss, I finally got sendmail 8.10.2 to work with sasl and smtp auth.
The same machine is also using Cyrus imapd. It is my understanding that
Cyrus Imapd uses SASL, which I configured (for the Cyrus IMAP application)
Procmail works with sendmail, not as a replacement. I recommend you visit
http://www.procmail.org and then go to some of the nice tutorials listed on
there.
--Moby
-Original Message-
From: Enrico Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 1427
To: [EMAIL
I got it to work about two weeks ago after horsing with it for some time.
Here is what I had to (don't ask me why ... this made it work!!).
1) Build and install from the source RPMs.
2) Install again from the binary RPMs.
Perform (1) and (2) both for Cyrus-SASL (do this one first) and then
PROTECTED]
Cc: Mobeen Azhar
Subject: Re: Keeping RH up to date
Mobeen Azhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I installed a RH 6.1 box and upgraded the kernel and modules stuff to
6.2 by following the Kernel update howto. [..]
It seems that the FTP sites that it checks are very slow and after
I installed a RH 6.1 box and upgraded the kernel and modules stuff to 6.2 by
following the Kernel update howto. The system is working fine. I have a
couple of RPMS installed that I would like to keep up to date. I have been
unable to get autorpm to ever compelte successfully! It seems that
Well, the only requirement is to run a non M$ OS that is available for a low
cost AND that can integrate with Novell's NDS. I am able to successfully
run Novell's NDS4Linux on RH, not sure if it would work with Debian. If I
can get NDS4Linux to work with Debian then I have no problem with
Hello all,
I installed the Cyrus mail package using the cyrus-imapd-1.6.19-2 RPM. I
used the source RPM and compiled it myself. The build and installation went
fine. I also installed Cyrus SASL via the cyrus-sasl-1.5.11-2 RPM. Again I
used the source RPM and the build and installation went
ICMP does not use a TCP or UDP port number. ICMP is indicated by a bit in
the packet type field - I think.
--Moby
-Original Message-
From: Jake McHenry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 1520
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ICMP Port Number
Hello all, I just installed the Cyrus mail package on a RedHat 6.2 box. I
installed the package from the cyrus-imapd-1.6.19-2 rpm and other associated
rpms that it required. The installation went without a hitch. However,
whenever I try to authenticate, either from an IMAP client or on the
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 18:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Upgrade from 6.1 to 6.2
On 23-May-00 Mobeen Azhar opined:
Hello all, I have a rather newbie question, so please bear with me! I
just
purchased and installed RedHat Linux 6.1 and everything is up
You can put either the address of your Linux box or your ISP. I prefer using
the Linux box since that prevents dial-ups just for local name resolutions.
On Sunday, March 08, 1998 11:28 AM, Krzysztof Zaraska
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
47 matches
Mail list logo
