Ed:
Thanks for your reply. Yes the XP machine insists on being the Master Browser.
I don't know how to "humble" the machine, it wants to be boss cluck, if
you know what I mean. How do I calm it down? I have set associated priorities,
such as these, high in the Linux Samba file smb.conf s
I have a network of Win95 and Linux machines. Every machine has shares
and all machines can access the shares of all other machines. There is
one exception. I recently obtained (with dual boot objectives for
Linux and XP Pro) a new addition for video and sound editing purposes.
But I cann
Jim Baxter wrote:
> Good Morning (or whatever it is where you are)
>
> I am considering installing Linux on some large workstations that now run
> that other "OS".
> We do most of our work with Linux in character mode but still need some
> windows apps.
> We could replace Office 200 with the Core
Jim Baxter wrote:
> Good Morning (or whatever it is where you are)
>
> I am considering installing Linux on some large workstations that now run
> that other "OS".
> We do most of our work with Linux in character mode but still need some
> windows apps.
> We could replace Office 200 with the Core
Charles:
Well I think I've got part of my answer.
See attached file.
Bye-thanks_TED
$ perldoc cgi_to_mod_perl
For using mod_perl as a CGI replacement, the recommended
configuration is as follows:
Alias /perl/ /real/path/to/perl-scripts/
SetHa
u might want to consider putting that script logic
> into perl so it can be used both as a cgi and under mod_perl.
>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, p-thilts wrote:
>
> > > there is no silver mod_perl bullet. I would start here
> > >
> > > http://perl.apache.org
> &g
Charles Galpin wrote:
> Hi TED
>
> there is no silver mod_perl bullet. I would start here
>
> http://perl.apache.org
>
> Als, your description below of the cgi process is a bit warped (or you are
> using it in a warped manner) :).
>
> charles
>
> On Sat, 15 Ap
With a lot of help I've now arrived at a detailed procedure that builds
from sources Apache, mod_perl, PHP( which can access the PostgresSQL and
MySQL databases), as well as the database themselves (Server, Client,
and Development). The tar files from the RH6.2 rpm source files were
used (except
Charles Galpin wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, p-thilts wrote:
> >
> > You said you were running 6.5.3-6 on a 6.1 box but it was not clear to me
> > whether you installed rpms downloaded from the Postgresql web site or if
> > they were included in the Red Hat vs 6.1 dis
gt; charles
>
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, p-thilts wrote:
>
> > Charles Galpin wrote:
> >
> > > It's
> > >
> > > postgresql-6.5.3-6
> > >
> > > On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, p-thilts wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does anyone know the
A special thanks go out to:
Peter Blomgren
Michael J. McGillick
Charles Galpin
Rick Forrister
Hopefully, I have not missed any contributors or mistyped their names.
Thankyou gentlemen for your help and patience. And a special thanks to
Peter for tackling the confused initial request. I was co
Peter Blomgren wrote:
> Ted,
>
> I was too tired to touch this the first time around... There
> are multiple issues here all bundled up in a big tar-ball of
> confusion, but I'll take a stab at it.
>
> > I know I'll get a response if I say the following: "Red Hat knows
> > that Postgresql is a s
Richard asked for the questions to be broken up. This is the FIRST
question from [RH-list-1].
Because the question refers to the Postgresql web site it may be
consider [OT]. I wasn't sure.
I was looking at the RedHat 6.0 full installation I have on one of my
network machines and this ended up
Am resending this as I got no response from the list the first time.
It seems that most of the list that uses a database seems to prefer
MySQL yet the Red Hat distribution provides Postgresql. I know I'll get
a response if I say the following: "Red Hat knows that Postgresql is a
superior database
Does anyone know the version of Postgresql for Red Hat 6.2?
Bye-thanks_TED
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
When getting ready to install Postgresql (using RPM on Slackware) I
looked at the RedHat 6.0 full installation I have on another machine.
This ended up in a number of questions about RedHat and Postgres. To
start with, I noticed 3 RPM packages (for the full installation). On
the Postgres web si
Timothy Reaves wrote:
> I can't figure this one out. It is installed on a RH6 box, and
> permissions are 755 with the directories suid root (which the install
> did). Runs fine as root, but not as a user.
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "un
;
> Subject: Re: configuring PHP on a RH 5.2 machine
> Resent-Date: 15 Jan 2000 05:01:50 -
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-CC: recipient list not shown: ;
> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 05:01:54 -0700
> From: p-thilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Market
Phing Zhaichaign wrote:
> I would like to know how come when i set 'Superuser Equivalence' under linux
> conf, the user doesn't have superuser equivalence. For example, can't run
> linuxconf, can't change permissions on files owned by root, can't do various
> other things.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> PZ
Rita Meng wrote:
> I have been off this list for several months. If this is a question that is
> repeatedly asked, please forgive me.
>
> I have tried searching the archives according to the directions but I always
> get something that makes no sense. The only archive command that I can get
> to
I posted the following on the apache-list (that is where it belongs but
the list is not very active yet)
If there is anyone on this list that is an Apache expert but is not on
the apache list could you please get in touch with me. Unless you are
knowledgeable with Apache, Perl, PHP don't waste yo
21 matches
Mail list logo
