19 Sep 2003 11:49:53 -0500
>
> christopher j bottaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the debian systems at my school have vim-6.1 but don't do syntax
> > highlighting.
> > how do i get syntax highlighting like on my redhat-9 system at home?
>
> Hi Christoph
the debian systems at my school have vim-6.1 but don't do syntax highlighting.
how do i get syntax highlighting like on my redhat-9 system at home?
thanks,
-- christopher
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:49:53 -0500
christopher j bottaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the debian systems at my school have vim-6.1 but don't do syntax
> highlighting.
> how do i get syntax highlighting like on my redhat-9 system at home?
>
Hi Christopher,
If the syntax
the debian systems at my school have vim-6.1 but don't do syntax highlighting.
how do i get syntax highlighting like on my redhat-9 system at home?
thanks,
-- christopher
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Alex Sharaz wrote:
hi all,
quick question,
I've got a rh 6.1 system here and the owners have lost the root password for
it.
quick pointers as to how to log onto the box?
bot off a cdrom and then edit the /etc/passwd / shadow files?
Any help appreciated
Alex
At the LILO prompt, type
Alex Sharaz wrote:
> I've got a rh 6.1 system here and the owners have lost the root
> password for it.
> quick pointers as to how to log onto the box?
>
> bot off a cdrom and then edit the /etc/passwd / shadow files?
An easier way is to boot into single user mode. When you
hi all,
quick question,
I've got a rh 6.1 system here and the owners have lost the root password for
it.
quick pointers as to how to log onto the box?
bot off a cdrom and then edit the /etc/passwd / shadow files?
Any help appreciated
Alex
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mai
hi all,
quick question,
I've got a rh 6.1 system here and the owners have lost the root password for
it.
quick pointers as to how to log onto the box?
bot off a cdrom and then edit the /etc/passwd / shadow files?
Any help appreciated
Alex
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe m
Hi all,
I don't know why I can't start KDE2 from linux shell. I think I have
done all the instructions for compiling and installing the from the
sources.
I have Red Hat 6.1 on my machine and I already remove KDE1.
After 3 hours compiling all the sources (including Qt 2.2.1) with no
Yup...as I acknolwedged, in a later message. The perils of posting messages
between 4 and 5AM. :)
"Anthony E. Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 13-Sep-2002/04:30 -0500, Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >You can ignore what fstab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13-Sep-2002/04:30 -0500, Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You can ignore what fstab says, in this case, since the floppy isn't
>mounted.
I think you're thinking of mtab.
>"mount /mnt/floppy" won't do any good, because /mnt/floppy is not a
I do stand corrected, to a point, on the "mount /mnt/floppy" thing from
earlier...with the fstab entry, if the floppy was ext2 formatted, it
should have worked.
However, as I pointed out below, if the floppy is DOS formatted, you need
to specify the full command, with file system type.
On Fri
ppy?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony E. Greene
> Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 10:49
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mount command for 6.1
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 13-Sep-2
You can ignore what fstab says, in this case, since the floppy isn't
mounted.
"mount /mnt/floppy" won't do any good, because /mnt/floppy is not a
device. "mount /dev/fd0" on its own won't do any good, because you aren't
specifying a filesystem type or a mount point.
If the floppy is an ext2
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mount command for 6.1
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 13-Sep-2002/09:39 +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I have to add a driver via a floppy, but I could not mount the
> >floppy
> >
>
> I've used the command mount /mnt/floppy and mount /dev/fd0 but these spew
> out that extra command s are needed and the msdos format on the floppy is
> not recognised
You can always (as root) mount it manually:
mount /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy
or even more specifically
mount /dev/fd0u1440 /mnt/f
What is the syntax for the mount command for RH6.1 for the floppy?
Thanks
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Anthony E. Greene
Sent: Friday, 13 September 2002 10:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mount command for 6.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13-Sep-2002/09
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:39:39AM +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The /etc/fstab shows the floppy as ext2 fs should I change it to "auto"?
Yes.
> Is there a special syntax for mounting a floppy onto a RH 6.1 system?
Make the change to /etc/fstab and run "
Hi
I was introduced to Linux at RH7.0 level and are struggling to understand
why I cannot mount a floppy on a RH6.1 system I came across yesterday.
I've used the command mount /mnt/floppy and mount /dev/fd0 but these spew
out that extra command s are needed and the msdos format on the floppy is
>The /etc/fstab shows the floppy as ext2 fs should I change it to "auto"?
Yes.
>Is there a special syntax for mounting a floppy onto a RH 6.1 system?
No.
- --
Anthony E. Greene <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]%3E>
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6
Hi
I was introduced to Redhat at version 7.0 but yesterday I found a 6.1
machine.
I have to add a driver via a floppy, but I could not mount the floppy
The normal mount /mnt/floppy or mount /dev/fd0 caused the machine to
spew garbage about wrong formats
The /etc/fstab shows the floppy as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-Sep-2002/15:35 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>FYI - A guy from sendmail.org stated that the original problem was that
>linuxconf was used to configure sendmail which was very bad!
>
>Does anyone use 'webmin' to configure their server?
The b
Thank you all.
I took the advice and upgraded my sendmail to 8.11.6 from the 6.2 area. I
installed all 3 rpms then ran this to reconfigure my sendmail
m4 sendmail.mc > sendmail.cf
Then tweaked the /etc/mail/access to setup the appropriate relaying.
Now I have to trawl through the blacklists li
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 09/11/2002 at 06:37 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>A client of ours has a HP Netserver E50 running RH 6.1. There server is
>an open relay. I have looked on the web, and I have noticed that the
>best way to fix the problem is to upgrade the O/S t
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:37:19AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is my first post to the list.
Welcome!
> A client of ours has a HP Netserver E50 running RH 6.1. There server is an
> open relay. I have looked on the web, and I have noticed that the best way
> to fix the p
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The have sendmail-8.9.3-15 installed.
>
> Is the above the problem? - How can I fix it?
1. Update the box to a more current version, or remove or
firewall it away from the internet or mailserver duties it
seemingly is serving -- this as a matter
Hi,
This is my first post to the list.
A client of ours has a HP Netserver E50 running RH 6.1. There server is an
open relay. I have looked on the web, and I have noticed that the best way
to fix the problem is to upgrade the O/S to a new version, however is there
anything one can do to stop
I stand corrected.
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Srinivas Rao Kollipara wrote:
>
> > Can anyone tell me where exactly i can download the redhat linux 6.1
> > version.
> > Please give me the exact link and the address.
>
> ftp://f
I don't think you can, anymore. You *might* be able to download 6.2.
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Srinivas Rao Kollipara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell me where exactly i can download the redhat linux 6.1
> version.
> Please give me the exact link and the address.
>
&g
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.1/en/
=
`When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows", people just stare at you
blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, *for free*".'
- Linus Torvalds
t; contents of a remote server:
Well, I assume the individual want the iso images to install...
ftp> pwd
257 "/pub/redhat/linux/6.1/en/iso"
ftp> ls
227 Entering Passive Mode (66,77,185,38,51,50)
150 Here comes the directory listing.
226 Directory send OK.
Unlike...
ftp> p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But, if you actually desend into these directories you will find them to
> be quite empty. :-)
Really? I wonder what program you're using that doesn't show you the
contents of a remote server:
ncftp ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.1/e
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/
> drwxr-xr-x3 00 4096 Mar 29 2001 6.1
But, if you actually desend into these directories you will find them to
be quite empty. :-)
Ed
--
http://www.shorewa
Srinivas Rao Kollipara wrote:
> Can anyone tell me where exactly i can download the redhat linux 6.1
> version.
> Please give me the exact link and the address.
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/
drwxr-xr-x3 00 4096 Mar 29 2001 1.0
drwxr-xr
Hi,
Can anyone tell me where exactly i can download the redhat linux 6.1
version.
Please give me the exact link and the address.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Sri
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman
gt; ftp.redhat.com, but it's a little busy most of the time.
> >
> > More specifically:
> > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.1/en/iso/i386/redhat-6.1-i386.iso
>
> Hey thanks! I have one other dumb question. What is this 'iso' extention
> format? Ho
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Archived snapshot of 6.1?
On Sun, 26 May 2002, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 07:41:04PM -0300, Chris Watt wrote:
> >
> > Redhat has every (non-beta) version they've released on their ftp site
> > ftp.redhat.com, but it&#
specifically:
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.1/en/iso/i386/redhat-6.1-i386.iso
Hey thanks! I have one other dumb question. What is this 'iso' extention
format? Hopefully this is a file format that individual files can be
extracted from like with tar.
Thanks,
--Paul
On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 07:41:04PM -0300, Chris Watt wrote:
>
> Redhat has every (non-beta) version they've released on their ftp site
> ftp.redhat.com, but it's a little busy most of the time.
More specifically:
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.1/en/iso/i386/redhat
At 13:18 2002/05/24 -0700, Paul Thomas wrote:
>Does anyone know if there is a distro snapshot archived
>someplace?
Redhat has every (non-beta) version they've released on their ftp site
ftp.redhat.com, but it's a little busy most of the time.
--
Q: What's tiny and yellow and very, very, d
Hi,
Pardon my barging in, I have searched the RH site and a couple
other places to no avail.
I need to restore some files and things on my out-of-the-box
6.1 install but my CD does not work. The CD looks to be in fine
shape and worked for the install and has been stored carefully
since.
I
enssh rpms. Worked great.
On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 01:22, diyanat wrote:
> Hi Friends
>
> I am planning to install Openssh on my redhat Linux box 6.1 ,and wanted some advice
>
> I want to know if the rpm's available with 7.2 can be installed on 6.1 and are there
>any depend
On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 00:22, diyanat wrote:
>
> I am planning to install Openssh on my redhat Linux box 6.1 ,and wanted some
> advice
>
> I want to know if the rpm's available with 7.2 can be installed on 6.1
> and are there any dependencies or updates to be don
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
diyanat wrote:
>I want to know if the rpm's available with 7.2 can be installed on
>6.1 and are there any dependencies or updates to be done for the
>same. has anyone successfully did it ?
No, binary compatibility is only assure
Hi Friends
I am planning to install Openssh on my
redhat Linux box 6.1 ,and wanted some advice
I want to know if the rpm's available with 7.2
can be installed on 6.1 and are there any dependencies or updates to be
done for the same. has anyone successfully did it ?
If the
I just got an old HP Desk Jet 500 and connected to my 6.1 (2.2.12 kernel)
box. Printtool cannot autodetect the printer, although it's listed in
printtool. Since it doesn't see the printer, trying the "print ASCII
directly to printer port" menu item only returns an er
At 4/22/01 11:50 AM -0400, you wrote:
>You can't run binaries compiled for glibc2.2 (RedHat 7.0 and 7.1) on a 6.x
>system which uses glibc2.1. There are no RPMs of glib2.2 for RH6.x.
By this I take it you mean that X 4.xxx requires glibc2.2, and that the
upgrade is therefore not practical?
--
ing G450.
| > > > Can not upgrade Redhat 6.1, because I'rm running a very impostant
| > > application, which I cannot upgrade.
| > > > Any idea where I can get the binary?
| > >
| > >It won't work - support for G450 was a added to Red Hat Linux 7.1, and
|
D]> writes:
> >
> > > Would like to get working binary for supporting G450.
> > >
> > > Can not upgrade Redhat 6.1, because I'rm running a very impostant
> > application, which I cannot upgrade.
> > >
> > > Any idea where I can g
At 4/22/01 10:52 AM -0400, you wrote:
>"Giulio Bertellini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Would like to get working binary for supporting G450.
> >
> > Can not upgrade Redhat 6.1, because I'rm running a very impostant
> application, which I cann
"Giulio Bertellini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would like to get working binary for supporting G450.
>
> Can not upgrade Redhat 6.1, because I'rm running a very impostant application, which
>I cannot upgrade.
>
> Any idea where I can get the binary?
Would like to get working binary for supporting
G450.
Can not upgrade Redhat 6.1, because I'm running a
very important application, which I
cannot upgrade.
Any idea where I can get the binary?
Thank you very much.
Giulio Bertellini
Would like to get working binary for supporting
G450.
Can not upgrade Redhat 6.1, because I'rm running a
very impostant application, which I cannot upgrade.
Any idea where I can get the binary?
Thank you very much.
Giulio Bertellini
Thanks for the answers, Trond and Mikkel!
John
On 9 Apr 2001, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> John Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I noticed that some rpms are not in the 6.1 update directory that are in
> > the 6.2 dir. Is it safe to say that any update for 6.2
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, John Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that some rpms are not in the 6.1 update directory that are in
> the 6.2 dir. Is it safe to say that any update for 6.2 also applies to
> 6.1? I use autorpm to notify of new packages on a couple 6.1 servers that
> I'
John Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I noticed that some rpms are not in the 6.1 update directory that are in
> the 6.2 dir. Is it safe to say that any update for 6.2 also applies to
> 6.1?
Yes. We don't support 6.1 directly anymore AFAIR - we keep the "end of
serie
Hi,
I noticed that some rpms are not in the 6.1 update directory that are in
the 6.2 dir. Is it safe to say that any update for 6.2 also applies to
6.1? I use autorpm to notify of new packages on a couple 6.1 servers that
I'm not ready to upgrade and I'll just point autorpm to t
I went to real.com and followed "Real Player 8 Basic"
link to the unix are and then chose "rp8.libc6_rpm...even followed the
instructions and renamed it,but when I try to install it with gnome_rpm,or using
the command lineit say .."...for a different architecture."
What gives?
Hi
I'm setting up kerberos 5 on RedHat 6.1, and have a problem setting up ftp
service
I addedKadmin: princ host/fimee.ugto.mx ftp/fimee44.ugto.mx
telnet/fimee44.ugto.mx where: fimee44.ugto.mx is my host server and
my ftp server, and all worked well, all were created.
after t
Hello, all.
I have a RH 6.1 professional edition server running e-commerce right now,
and some of its certificates are coming due. Since the RSA patent has
expired, what is the best way to go forward? Is there a howto somewhere to
go from the secureweb rpm to using apache+ssl? I'm wary
John,
I believe you should be able to install RH 6.x on 8MB if you install in
'text only' mode.
Regards
Gustav
John Himpel wrote:
>
> I am trying to install Redhat 6.1 on a 386 with 8MB of RAM. When I try
> to load the second stage installer, I get a signal 7. I c
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Statux wrote:
> I think it requires around 16MB now adays.. or that's what I've gathered.
>
>
>
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, John Himpel wrote:
>
> > I am trying to install Redhat 6.1 on a 386 with 8MB of RAM. When I try
> > to load the
I think it requires around 16MB now adays.. or that's what I've gathered.
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, John Himpel wrote:
> I am trying to install Redhat 6.1 on a 386 with 8MB of RAM. When I try
> to load the second stage installer, I get a signal 7. I can get other
> mini-di
I am trying to install Redhat 6.1 on a 386 with 8MB of RAM. When I try
to load the second stage installer, I get a signal 7. I can get other
mini-distributions (Coyote, Tomsrtbt, etc) to run fine on the machine.
Does the 6.1 installer require more than 6MB of RAM? PS: This happens
with both
Bret,
You may have hit on something. I originally posted the wrong card
(sorry); this is a netgear EA 201C ISA NIC 10BaseT, that can be set to run
on 3,5,9,10,11,12 or 15 IRQ.
I'll try to find Donald Beckers site and see if I can run his diagnostic
program.
Thanks!
Glen
Today, at 09:58, Bret
Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
> It doesn't even show up:
>
> $ less /proc/interrupts
>CPU0
> 0: 705187 XT-PIC timer
> 1:230 XT-PIC keyboard
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc
> 12:363 XT-PIC
y have ran into this and
can give some more detail than I have.
Best of Luck,
Eddie Strohmier
- Original Message -
From: "Glen Lee Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 2:27 AM
Subject: Re: New 6.1 install not
ld this message from dmesg have anything to do with it?
apm: BIOS not found.
I'm beginning to think that this processor isn't RH compatible.
Glen
>- Original Message -
>From: "Glen Lee Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sen
ginal Message -
From: "Glen Lee Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: New 6.1 install not detecting NIC
> Yesterday, at 22:03, Statux sent through the Star Gate:
>
> >did you try to manuall
way that I could check to see if there's an IRQ conflict?
Also, I'm getting a couple of odd messages from dmesg:
ide2: ports already in use, skipping probe
ds: no socket drivers loaded!
I don't know for sure what these mean, but I'm sure it's not good.
Glen
>On
did you try to manually insmod eepro100, or something of that nature?
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
> I just installed 6.1 on an old 486-66 I had been running windows95 on.
> This is a clean install - reformatted everything and installed from
> scratch. This box doesn&#
I just installed 6.1 on an old 486-66 I had been running windows95 on.
This is a clean install - reformatted everything and installed from
scratch. This box doesn't have any PCI slots, so I've been using an Intel
Pro/100+ ISA NIC. It worked great in Windows95 but 6.1 can't dete
ECTED]>
Aan: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Verzonden: zaterdag 21 oktober 2000 11:38
Onderwerp: Re: IPChains (NHF - Newbeeized Help File). Also for Redhat 6.1?
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Roadrunner wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Hugh:
> > I Think you're right on th
it.Also, for the /home/smb/data
directory, make sure the peope you want to access it are in the staf
group. I am not sure, but I think the read and write settings end up
overriding the guest ok settings.
>
>
> I'm not sure this is enought information to solve this problem, b
ought information to solve this problem, but I hope
someone can tell me what's wrong with this setup.
Mikkel L. Ellertson,
You mentioned upgrading a couple of things on my Redhat 6.1 box. Wouldn't it
be easier to buy a RH6.2 distro and do a upgrade?
I don't know what size the "upgra
(/sbin/ipchains)
>
> 4-Does the IPChains NHF (www.linuxnewbees.org) also work for Redhat 6.1?
> (It describes the procedure on Slackware 4.0, kernel 2.2.6, but it schould
> work with any 2.2.x kernel)
>
I haven't looked at it, but the firewall script generated should work with
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roadrunner
> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 01:23
> To: redhat-list
> Subject: IPChains (NHF - Newbeeized Help File). Also for Redhat 6.1?
>
>
> Hi, to all who read this
>
>
> First my contrib
nd the IPchains package? (preferably on the Redhat CD)
4-Does the IPChains NHF (www.linuxnewbees.org) also work for Redhat 6.1?
(It describes the procedure on Slackware 4.0, kernel 2.2.6, but it schould
work with any 2.2.x kernel)
5-I have access to the /TMP directory on the Linux box from the W
Is there a file slibbz2.so.0 that's linked to libbz2.so.1 If not, create
the symbolic link, and try again.
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Rich Shepard wrote:
> I'm running 6.1 on my main workstation and some packages (such as rpm)
> will not upgrade. Trying to upgrade the rpm package
I'm running 6.1 on my main workstation and some packages (such as rpm)
will not upgrade. Trying to upgrade the rpm package, for example to
rpm-3.0.6-6x.i386.rpm, fails because its dependent, libbz2.so.0, is not
found. However, I have libbz2.so.1 installed on my system.
Can I (or, sho
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>
> I just don't know... Mine is running great (RoadRunner on MediaOne
> errr... AT&T Global) with either plain old pump or dhcpcd. It came up,
> first shot, in the blink of an eye. Installer is trying to tell me that
> they don't support L
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:44:40PM -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> > If you have a cable modem, do *not* use pump. Use dhcpcd or
> > dhcp-client. Pump is the wrong thing to use. When a lease expires, pump
> > just aborts. It will not renegotiate a new lease
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> If you have a cable modem, do *not* use pump. Use dhcpcd or
> dhcp-client. Pump is the wrong thing to use. When a lease expires, pump
> just aborts. It will not renegotiate a new lease for you. The result is
> that your ip address will change every few d
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 02:06:51PM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> If you have a cable modem, do *not* use pump. Use dhcpcd or
> dhcp-client. Pump is the wrong thing to use. When a lease expires, pump
> just aborts. It will not renegotiate a new lease for you. The result is
> that your ip address wi
3 Sep 2000, Hal Burgiss wrote:
=>On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 02:23:07PM -0400, Jason Oppel wrote:
=>> I am currently having problems getting my RH 6.1 box to connect to my cable
=>> internet service (Road Runner [Greensboro, NC]). Supposedly vanilla DHCP
=>> should work
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 02:23:07PM -0400, Jason Oppel wrote:
> I am currently having problems getting my RH 6.1 box to connect to my cable
> internet service (Road Runner [Greensboro, NC]). Supposedly vanilla DHCP
> should work ok but I'm having problems.
>
> Here's
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 02:23:07PM -0400, Jason Oppel wrote:
> I am currently having problems getting my RH 6.1 box to connect to my cable
> internet service (Road Runner [Greensboro, NC]). Supposedly vanilla DHCP
> should work ok but I'm having problems.
> Here's what ha
I am currently having problems getting my RH 6.1 box to connect to my cable
internet service (Road Runner [Greensboro, NC]). Supposedly vanilla DHCP
should work ok but I'm having problems.
Here's what happens... I try to grab an IP using pump with:
pump -i eth0
shell spits out "O
Run NTSYSV.
- Original Message -
From: Smith, Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 5:47 PM
Subject: New install of redhat 6.1 takes long time to boot
> New install of redhat 6.1 takes long time to boot
>
> I i
One thing you can do is run setup as root and disable anything you don't
want to run.
"Wagner, Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/22/2000 01:13:12 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:
For starters, if you don't have any NFS partitions, disable NFS.
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 10:47 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: New install of redhat 6.1 takes long time to boot
New instal
New install of redhat 6.1 takes long time to boot
I installed 6.1 on a new computer but I did a full install and the boot time takes to
long. How can I tell linux which servers to start at boot time??
Johnathan Mark Smith
Messaging & Collaboration
PaineWebber Incorporated
1000 Ha
Can anyone tell me how to add in extra consoles. I was told that RH can
hold up to 63, and you can add them in by modifying /etc/inittab, but my
efforts to do so seem to limit the max to 11. I can't find a way to
access tty12, etc...
Glen
___
Redha
how to use sendmail to block spam
>mail from getting in? I tried to use the same configuration I had on 5.2,
>using 6.1 now, but it isn't working.
>
>I set up sendmail.mc as such:
>
>LOCAL_CONFIG
>Kjunk hash -a@JUNK /etc/mail/deny
>
>This produced the following
Would someone refresh my memory as to how to use sendmail to block spam
mail from getting in? I tried to use the same configuration I had on 5.2,
using 6.1 now, but it isn't working.
I set up sendmail.mc as such:
LOCAL_CONFIG
Kjunk hash -a@JUNK /etc/mail/deny
This produced the following
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Martin Brown wrote:
> Yes, all items, except the install date, match:
...
> Boy, this is turning out to be a real puzzler!
Yeah, it is. Try installing python (1.5.2-13) from Red Hat 6.2.
MSG
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Martin Brown wrote:
>
> > Thank you for responding to my query.
> >
> > [root@localhost /new_soft]# rpm -q pygtk
> > pygtk-0.6.6-0_helix_3
> > [root@localhost /new_soft]# rpm -V pygtk
> > [root@localhost /new_soft]#
>
> # rpm -q
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Martin Brown wrote:
> Thank you for responding to my query.
>
> [root@localhost /new_soft]# rpm -q pygtk
> pygtk-0.6.6-0_helix_3
> [root@localhost /new_soft]# rpm -V pygtk
> [root@localhost /new_soft]#
# rpm -qi pygtk
Name: pygtkRelocations:
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Well, 'up2date' worked well for quite some time, then, after installing
> > Helix gnome it stopped working:
> >
> > [root@localhost /root]# up2date
> > Traceback (innermost last):
> > File "/usr/sbin
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, 'up2date' worked well for quite some time, then, after installing
> Helix gnome it stopped working:
>
> [root@localhost /root]# up2date
> Traceback (innermost last):
> File "/usr/sbin/up2date", line 155, in ?
> from gui import Gui
> Fil
1 - 100 of 765 matches
Mail list logo
