RE: Partitioning?

2003-01-02 Thread Spanke, Alexander
Hi, You want delete all your partitions to reinstall Win and RedHat ? Boot with the RedHat Install CD and choose repair at the first Boot-Screen, you get a Recovery System, so you can use all Linux partitioning tools. Regards Alex -Original Message- From: Cannon, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL

new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Joshua James
We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall. Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows: /dev/hda1 ext3990mb /home /dev/hda6

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Willem van der Walt[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Under 7.2, the web home dir is normally under /var/www. I would try to tell the installation program to change prefix to some thing else. If that does not work, I would make a link to a directory under /usr where there is a lot of space. If it wants to create a directory called newprog

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Joshua James
I really think Apache uses /etc/httpd, is it safe to change that? Will it affect other programs? ColdFusion wants to install to /opt, is that safe to change? Should I make a /usr/ColdFusion or /var/ColdFusion? On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 09:43, Willem van der Walt wrote: Hi, Under 7.2, the web home

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread achana
Joshua James wrote: We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall. Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows: /dev/hda1 ext3

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread achana
Willem van der Walt wrote: Hi, Under 7.2, the web home dir is normally under /var/www. I would try to tell the installation program to change prefix to some thing else. If that does not work, I would make a link to a directory under /usr where there is a lot of space. If it wants to

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread achana
Joshua James wrote: I really think Apache uses /etc/httpd, is it safe to change that? Will it affect other programs? ColdFusion wants to install to /opt, is that safe to change? Should I make a /usr/ColdFusion or /var/ColdFusion? On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 09:43, Willem van der Walt wrote:

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-Jun-2002/09:05 -0400, Joshua James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation of NT servers. This will be an intranet server

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread achana
Joshua James wrote: I really think Apache uses /etc/httpd, is it safe to change that? Will it affect other programs? ColdFusion wants to install to /opt, is that safe to change? Should I make a /usr/ColdFusion or /var/ColdFusion? On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 09:43, Willem van der Walt wrote:

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Paul Branston
I would use /usr/local/www for the DocumentRoot and /usr/local/coldfusion for the coldfusion base. Apache is easy to change, edit the httpd.conf to show the new location of the document root. Look for the line DocumentRoot /var/www/htdocs or some such directory. Coldfusion will probably prompt

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread achana
Anthony E. Greene wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-Jun-2002/09:05 -0400, Joshua James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation of NT servers.

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Joshua James
I'm concerned about installation. This came pre-installed. Normally with Windows I would easily reinstall but I'm not sure about drivers or even tech support. It is a Dell PowerEdge 350, it is however just a development server. Everything will be reinstalled from scratch on a new server for full

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Javier Gostling
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 10:40, Joshua James wrote: I'm concerned about installation. This came pre-installed. Normally with Windows I would easily reinstall but I'm not sure about drivers or even tech support. Hmm... Last year I installed a few Dell PowerApp linux based boxes. There was a java

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-Jun-2002/10:28 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anthony E. Greene wrote: [snip] As you get familiar with Linux, you will get your own ideas about how your partitions should be laid out. I would have wiped that machine and setup my own

Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Paul Greene
Apache is quite flexible and can be installed almost anywhere you want to put it. PG Joshua James wrote: I really think Apache uses /etc/httpd, is it safe to change that? Will it affect other programs? ColdFusion wants to install to /opt, is that safe to change? Should I make a

Re: Partitioning HD

2001-02-20 Thread John Aldrich
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, you wrote: I have two partitions, both Fat32. Would like to install RH 7 and am trying to find out if I need to repartion the entire drive and reload everything or is there a way to just add the linux partitions. My two partitions are 16G and 2G both on the same HDD

Re: Partitioning HD

2001-02-20 Thread Mike Burger
If you don't need the 2nd partition for DOS/Windows, at all, you can use the Linux fdisk to change the partition type to type 83 (Linux native)...or you can delete that partition and repartition the 2GB space (assuming that it's currently your D: drive) for use with LInux...eithr way, you can

Re: Partitioning HD

2001-02-20 Thread Mike Burger
Scratch what I said, earlier. Grab parted, or Partition Magic. Shrink your C: drive by about 15MB at th efront of the drive. You can even shrink the C: at the back of the drive, too. When you go to partition, designate that 15MB slice as /boot (keeping your boot area above the 1024 cylinder

Re: re-partitioning

2000-09-02 Thread M. Neidorff
At 10:14 AM 08/31/2000 -0700, you wrote: But in any case, if you can burn CDs and have a computer that can boot from the CDROM (almost any computer built in the last few years), then in a situation like this you might want to consider downloading the "Linuxcare Bootable Business Card".

re-partitioning

2000-08-31 Thread M. Neidorff
Hi folks, I know that we have beat this topic up for a while. I just want to clarify an issue. I've just gotten a new HDD and want to take my RH 6.2 installation and tar the partitions onto the new drive (easy) delete existing partitions from old drive, (also easy) * re-partition old

re-partitioning (more info)

2000-08-31 Thread M. Neidorff
Hi folks, While I am thinking this through, it occurred to me that once I delete the existing partitions I won't have tar or fdisk available anymore to work with. I've created a boot disk (mkbootdisk) and verified that it will boot the system. Will cp'ing the files "tar" and "fdisk" to the

Re: re-partitioning

2000-08-31 Thread Duane Clark
Mark wrote: Hi folks, I know that we have beat this topic up for a while. I just want to clarify an issue. I've just gotten a new HDD and want to take my RH 6.2 installation and tar the partitions onto the new drive (easy) delete existing partitions from old drive, (also easy)

Re: re-partitioning (more info)

2000-08-31 Thread Statux
You'd need static versions of those utilities. Libraries are too big for bootdisks. You can prolly manage to get the source and compile your own static copies :) On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, M. Neidorff wrote: Hi folks, While I am thinking this through, it occurred to me that once I delete the

Re: partitioning

2000-07-22 Thread Matt Whitfield
Warren Piece wrote: total newbie question... i'm trying to install redhat, currently running win 98, and am using fips to partition my hd. i've defragged a couple of times, but there is still a small amount of information that is pushed to the very end of the hd (which is not even half

Re: partitioning

2000-07-01 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Warren, i've defragged a couple of times, but there is still a small amount of information that is pushed to the very end of the hd Did you check (with a disk editor or defrag utility) which files are at the end of the disk? If you are using Norton Utilities, it might be

Re: partitioning

2000-06-30 Thread Gordon Messmer
Warren Piece wrote: is not even half full). because the last cylinder is not empty, fips boots me out and won't let me do anything. any help would be great. Perhaps you could try parted? Search for it on freshmeat. You can download a bootable floppy image (use rawrite from the Red Hat

Re: partitioning

2000-06-30 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Warren Piece wrote: total newbie question... i'm trying to install redhat, currently running win 98, and am using fips to partition my hd. i've defragged a couple of times, but there is still a small amount of information that is pushed to the very end of the hd

Re: partitioning

2000-06-30 Thread Stephen Liu
Hi Warren, Take my advice don't use fips. It is not safe as indicated in the warning of this resizing software. I got a bitter lesson twice in using this software. The partition will be destroyed automatically for unknown reason on starting PC, everything then gone. Partition Magic is

Re: partitioning

2000-06-30 Thread Charles Galpin
Your current situation doesn't sound good, but just wanted to offer that I have used fips several times and it has been very reliable each time. Follow the directions carefully of course. charles On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, Stephen Liu wrote: Hi Warren, Take my advice don't use fips. It is not

Re: partitioning with diskdruid: not enough space

2000-01-14 Thread Alan Mead
At 09:48 PM 1/14/00 +0100, David Krings wrote: What am i doing wrong ? I know that i had the same problem back then when Have you read the large disk HOWTO? Go to www.redhat.com, click on suporrt, find their own HOWTO on large disks and then matbe visit www.linuxdocs.org and read the

Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-16 Thread Tim Fairchild
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Jason Grovert wrote: What is the best way to partition a drive as far as sizing goes. Let's say I have a 8 gig hard drive. How would everyone do it and for what reasons? As said, it depends, but I think you are looking for what other people have done and why...

Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-16 Thread Alan Mead
At 12:45 AM 12/17/99 +1000, Tim Fairchild wrote: I made the mistake of making a single 256 meg swap partition rather than two 128 meg partitions as planned - but then found that apparently the new kernal handles larger swap files. Handy that :-) = 2.2 apparently. I would say it's safer to make

Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-15 Thread Brian Anderson
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Jason Grovert wrote: What is the best way to partition a drive as far as sizing goes. Let's say I have a 8 gig hard drive. How would everyone do it and for what reasons? Depends on what you are doing with it. I usually do 10 for /boot 100-150 for / 100-200 for /var

Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-15 Thread J. Scott Kasten
In addition, I'd split out /tmp, and of course don't forget your swap which the old rule of thumb is 2*physical ram, but I usually use 128M+ (2.2.x) or so with disk capacities being so outrageously huge. On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 02:16:18PM -0500, Brian Anderson wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Jason

Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-15 Thread Brian Anderson
Forgot about swap... oops :) I usually use either 2xRAM, or 128, depending on the system (my home machine has 128 physical, and i don't feel that i need 256 swap) Brian On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, J. Scott Kasten wrote: In addition, I'd split out /tmp, and of course don't forget your swap

Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-15 Thread Alan Mead
On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 02:16:18PM -0500, Brian Anderson wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Jason Grovert wrote: What is the best way to partition a drive as far as sizing goes. Let's say I have a 8 gig hard drive. How would everyone do it and for what reasons? Depends on what you are doing

Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-15 Thread Brian Anderson
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Alan Mead wrote: As I see it, the main rationale for making a partition is (1) because you must (not usually an issue with Linux), (2) to follow a standard, (3) to localize something like growing log files, mail spools, etc. so that they don't take up the whole disk, (4)

Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-15 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Jason Grovert wrote: What is the best way to partition a drive as far as sizing goes. Let's say I have a 8 gig hard drive. How would everyone do it and for what reasons? Cut it up into bite-sized pieces, and serve with Ranch dressing. Seriously, this is a FAQ with no

Re: Partitioning large hard drives

1998-06-02 Thread Ian Burrell
Sorry, forgot to mention that. Basically two jobs, POP3 mail and FTP server (very small). Then it is very good idea to separate the system software, the mail spool, and FTP area. Also, you probably want to have a separate partition for user home directories even if the only user will

Re: Partitioning large hard drives

1998-06-01 Thread John J. Donohue
I'm installing RH5.0 for a client. The hard drive they wish to use is a 6GB Maxtor IDE drive. I'd like to hear from others their thoughts on partitioning this drive as well as any pitfalls I may encounter. Depends. What's the machine going to be doing? Web server? Usenet news server?

RE: Partitioning large hard drives

1998-06-01 Thread Mike A. Lewis, CNE
Sorry, forgot to mention that. Basically two jobs, POP3 mail and FTP server (very small). -Original Message- From: John J. Donohue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 01, 1998 4:12 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:Re: Partitioning large hard drives I'm

Re: partitioning strategy

1998-05-25 Thread Patrick T. Berry
Deryk: I have an ASUS TX97-E Revision 1.12, using the clock chip ICS9147-09 and Bios Rev 4010a-0107e. the web page http://www.asus.com/support/mb/answers/chipset/75or83.asp contains all the info straight from the horses' mouth about running at 83 mhz. I have an Intel Pentium, SL27S series 233.

Re: partitioning strategy -Reply

1998-05-22 Thread Dennis Clark
Does this give you true 373Mhz performance? Just curios. "Patrick T. Berry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/21/98 05:10pm Ray Curtis wrote: "ptb" == Patrick T Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ptb I am overclocking a 233mx at 373.5 mhz! Boy, I hope you have this on a block of ice, this is a 66%

Re: partitioning strategy

1998-05-22 Thread Deryk Barker
Once upon a time Smith, Nathan A., Capt. wrote: Ok, I looked at the specs for the ASUS board (on thier web site) and all I could see was up to 83 Mhz. How are you getting 373? I would love to see how you did this (since I would love to try!!!). I think you are confusing bus clock

RE: partitioning strategy

1998-05-22 Thread Ray Curtis
"sna,c" == Smith, Nathan A , Capt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: sna,c Ok, sna,c I looked at the specs for the ASUS board (on thier web site) and all I could sna,c see was up to 83 Mhz. How are you getting 373? I would love to see how you sna,c did this (since I would love to try!!!). You can't

Re: partitioning strategy

1998-05-21 Thread Patrick T. Berry
Ray Curtis wrote: "ptb" == Patrick T Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ptb I am overclocking a 233mx at 373.5 mhz! Boy, I hope you have this on a block of ice, this is a 66% overclock speed ! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clark.net/pub/ray I am using an ASUS TX97-E Rev 1.12

Re: partitioning strategy

1998-05-18 Thread Patrick T. Berry
I usually put about 350 to 600 MB of drivespace towards DOS/Win. Windows 95 takes about 114Mb. DOS 7.xx is in the X:/Windows/Command directory. the rest of the partition is usually enough for lots of apps. Linux is cool anywhere, because you will probably use LILO to choose which system

Re: Partitioning

1998-05-04 Thread Chris Frost
What will the machine be used for? A user? A server? Everything Chris - Visit Me At http://home.hiwaay.net/~jfrost - -- For My Public PGP Key Visit http://home.hiwaay.net/~jfrost/pgp_key.txt -- -- PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!

Re: Partitioning

1998-05-04 Thread Rick Forrester
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I have a question. I have a 486/66 with 16MB of RAM and a 1.6GB HD. How many partitions should I have and what sizes should the be? I plan on installing all the RedHat packages. Thanks, Larry This is a bit like asking "What religion should I join", or

Re: Partitioning

1998-05-04 Thread Rick
I have a 486/66 with 16MB of RAM and a 1.6GB HD. How many partitions should I have and what sizes should the be? I plan on installing all the RedHat packages. Thanks, Larry This is a bit like asking "What religion should I join", or "What's the worst Microsoft product." or some such.