PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rpm question
RedHat 9, fresh install.
rpm -i perl-CGI-2.81-88.i386.rpm
Entered the command and nothing happened for 10 minutes and it seemed my
session had locked up, so I disconnected and reconnected. The process
was orphaned, so I killed it.
Now, just
Hi Ed,
Wrap your lines please.
Now, just running rpm -qa doesn't seem to work. I entered the command
10 minutes ago and it's still sitting there with no apparent activity.
Have a look in /var/lib/rpm and see if there are any __db* files.
Delete these and see if that fixes things. Maybe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:40:19 -0700, RedHat Mailing List wrote:
RedHat 9, fresh install.
rpm -i perl-CGI-2.81-88.i386.rpm
Entered the command and nothing happened for 10 minutes and it seemed my session had
locked up, so I disconnected and
** Reply to message from Barry Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 31 Jul 2003
08:18:35 -0400
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of RedHat Mailing List
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 11:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rpm question
RedHat 9, fresh install.
rpm -i perl-CGI-2.81-88.i386.rpm
Entered the command and nothing happened for 10 minutes and it seemed my session had
locked up, so I disconnected and reconnected. The process was orphaned, so I killed
it.
Now, just running rpm -qa doesn't seem to work. I entered
Hello,
I've recently installed RedHat 7.2 which includes
XFree86 3.3.6. I then rand up2date -u which
installed/updated everything under the sun. Now when
I type:
rpm -qa | grep XFree
I see both the 3.3.6 stuff as well as the 4.1.0 stuff.
I need to be running the 4.1.0 stuff to support the
rpm -qa | grep XXX shows package XXX installed. I need to remove XXX from
the RPM database without making any other changes to the system. In other
words, I just want package XXX to stop from showing up in rpm -qa but I do
not want rpm to uninstall anything from the box. How can this be done?
- Original Message -
From: Mobeen Azhar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:44 PM
Subject: RPM question
rpm -qa | grep XXX shows package XXX installed. I need to remove XXX from
the RPM database without making any other changes to the system
Thanks a bunch Anand Buddhdev, I will check that out.
--Moby
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Anand Buddhdev
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 17:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RPM question
- Original Message -
From
my rpm database seem to have !#@d up. i tried to do a
rpm --rebuilddb
but that didn't seem to update the database of rpm's
installed on my box. When i do a rpm -qa
i only see like 22 packages, which is wrong. I should have
around 240 packages installed. how can i go about
fixing this by
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:43:09PM -0700, Steve Lee wrote:
my rpm database seem to have !#@d up. i tried to do a
rpm --rebuilddb
What is the output of rpm --rebuilddb -v -v ?
The last 20 lines should suffice.
Emmanuel
___
Redhat-list mailing
Yes! This is what I need to do, thanks! The only trouble is when
I try:
rpm2cpio SysVinit-2.77-2.i386.rpm | cpio -dim --no-absolute-filenames
I get a 'broken pipe' error:(
Thanks again,
--Paul
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Michael Fratoni wrote:
Don't use rpm at all for this. You can use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 04:19 am, Paul Thomas wrote:
Yes! This is what I need to do, thanks! The only trouble is when
I try:
rpm2cpio SysVinit-2.77-2.i386.rpm | cpio -dim --no-absolute-filenames
I get a 'broken pipe' error:(
Hrmm,
I don't
Hi,
i want manually install the X- and KDE- System on my RH72 System, now i get
dependencies - error.
OK, i try to correct these errors, but now i get dependencie errors on
different files, i know how i can query an installed package for a file, but
not a not installed packeges.
Any ideas ?
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Michael Fratoni wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 04:19 am, Paul Thomas wrote:
Yes! This is what I need to do, thanks! The only trouble is when
I try:
rpm2cpio SysVinit-2.77-2.i386.rpm | cpio -dim
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Michael Fratoni wrote:
rpm2cpio SysVinit-2.77-2.i386.rpm | cpio -dim --no-absolute-filenames
I get a 'broken pipe' error:(
Hrmm,
I don't have that version available at present. Have you verified that the
rpm is good? It works here with a slightly different
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Paul Thomas wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Michael Fratoni wrote:
rpm2cpio SysVinit-2.77-2.i386.rpm | cpio -dim --no-absolute-filenames
I get a 'broken pipe' error:(
Hrmm,
I don't have that version available at present. Have you verified that the
rpm
There's one more thing you should look at when examining an RPM to see what
it's going to install on your system: the install scripts.
rpm -q --scripts somerpm.arch.rpm
should let you see what changes the rpm will make besides just installing new
files.
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Paul Thomas
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joseph V Moss wrote:
There's one more thing you should look at when examining an RPM to see what
it's going to install on your system: the install scripts.
rpm -q --scripts somerpm.arch.rpm
should let you see what changes the rpm will make besides just installing
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joseph V Moss wrote:
There's one more thing you should look at when examining an RPM to see what
it's going to install on your system: the install scripts.
rpm -q --scripts somerpm.arch.rpm
should let you see what changes the rpm will make besides just
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joseph V Moss wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Joseph V Moss wrote:
There's one more thing you should look at when examining an RPM to see what
it's going to install on your system: the install scripts.
rpm -q --scripts somerpm.arch.rpm
should let
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 07:58 pm, Paul Thomas wrote:
I'll paste from several different mails here...
How do I verify the package is good? I downloaded the distribution
snapshot from ftp://ftp.redhat.com.
rpm -K [packagename] will check the
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Paul Thomas wrote:
Actually I'm trying to unpack and install some of these rpm's on
another machine (Slackware) that has some drive space, etc.
Sorry to seem so inept. I'm used to working with tarballs that I
can plant anywhere I want.
Then get the tarball. Or get the
Hi,
I made a directory called 'work'. In it I put an rpm package. I
would like to unpack this package and install itself with directory
tree in a subdirectory of the 'work' directory. I don't want rpm
to install the package in the system itself. I just want to be
able to inspect a few things
Paul Thomas,
On Tuesday June 11, 2002 04:13, you said something about:
Hi,
I made a directory called 'work'. In it I put an rpm package. I
would like to unpack this package and install itself with directory
tree in a subdirectory of the 'work' directory. I don't want rpm
to install the
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Brian Ashe wrote:
Paul Thomas,
On Tuesday June 11, 2002 04:13, you said something about:
Hi,
I made a directory called 'work'. In it I put an rpm package. I
would like to unpack this package and install itself with directory
tree in a subdirectory of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 04:13 pm, Paul Thomas wrote:
Hi,
I made a directory called 'work'. In it I put an rpm package. I
would like to unpack this package and install itself with directory
tree in a subdirectory of the 'work' directory. I don't
Paul Thomas,
On Tuesday June 11, 2002 06:42, you said something about:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Brian Ashe wrote:
Paul Thomas,
On Tuesday June 11, 2002 04:13, you said something about:
Hi,
I made a directory called 'work'. In it I put an rpm package. I
would like to unpack this
Paul,
Check out the man page for rpm (man rpm) and look up the part that talks
about the --root option. This should be what you're looking for.
- matt
- Original Message -
From: Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:13 PM
Subject: RPM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 11 June 2002 08:37 pm, Matthew Bradford wrote:
Paul,
Check out the man page for rpm (man rpm) and look up the part that
talks about the --root option. This should be what you're looking for.
Not likely to do what he wants, I don't
Try rpm --rebuilddb, first.
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all
I have rpm question
After installing the db3 rpm packages in RH6.2, I got core dump when
running rpm -qa!
How do I recover it?
Thank you for your help
Dear all
I have rpm question
After installing the db3 rpm packages in RH6.2, I got core dump when
running rpm -qa!
How do I recover it?
Thank you for your help
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman
Hi all
After upgrade db3, I used rpm -qa but got
Segmentation fault
How do I do it?
Thank you
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover
http://greetings.yahoo.com/
Try rpm --rebuilddb first.
-Manuel.
ann kok wrote:
Hi all
After upgrade db3, I used rpm -qa but got
Segmentation fault
How do I do it?
Thank you
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter,
Install the latest Perl RPM.
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Ian Dobson wrote:
I installed perl from source, not from and rpm and now any time I install
anything that depends on perl it says
error failed dependancies:
/usr/bin/perl is needed by whatever.rpm
I do have a /usr/bin/perl and it does
Oooo...--justdb? I didn't know about that switch.
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Brian Ashe wrote:
Hi Ian,
On Tuesday, December 04, 2001, 11:46:40 PM, you babbled something about:
ID I installed perl from source, not from and rpm and now any time I install
ID anything that depends on perl it
The modules are of no consequence, as far as the RPM database goes, from
what I've seen.
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Ian Dobson wrote:
Ya, I thought about that, but perl is only one of them, I have a good
30 or 40 perl modules installed that were installed through cpan, so
I'd also have to get
Hi Ian,
Ya, I thought about that, but perl is only one of them, I have a good
30 or 40 perl modules installed that were installed through cpan
If these are modules that are not in the distro it is unlikely that you will
find any dependencies on them. In 7.2 one or two of
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 08:46:40PM -0800, Ian Dobson wrote:
I installed perl from source, not from and rpm and now any time I install
anything that depends on perl it says
error failed dependancies:
/usr/bin/perl is needed by whatever.rpm
I do have a /usr/bin/perl and it does work, and if
Hi Ian,
On Tuesday, December 04, 2001, 11:46:40 PM, you babbled something about:
ID I installed perl from source, not from and rpm and now any time I install
ID anything that depends on perl it says
ID error failed dependancies:
ID /usr/bin/perl is needed by whatever.rpm
ID I do have a
Ya, I thought about that, but perl is only one of them, I have a good
30 or 40 perl modules installed that were installed through cpan, so
I'd also have to get those rpm's, I was just wondering if you could
update the rpm database to include other stuff withough actually
going to the trouble
Hi,
I am going to update my RH7.2 install before recompiling the kernel and
trying my had at iptables. To make life easier I used IglooFTP-PRO to
download ALL the updates from the RH site and burned them to a CD. Now if
I do a rpm -Uvh * from the mounted CD, I understand that this will
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, BobH wrote:
Hi,
I am going to update my RH7.2 install before recompiling the kernel and
trying my had at iptables. To make life easier I used IglooFTP-PRO to
download ALL the updates from the RH site and burned them to a CD. Now if
I do a rpm -Uvh * from the
Charles,
Thanks. Better get my glasses checked. I skipped over the -F arguement.
Thanks again,
Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, BobH wrote:
Hi,
I am going to update my RH7.2 install before recompiling the kernel and
trying my had at iptables. To make life
Okay how is this possible?
I was trying to upgrade a library libxml.so.1 to libxml.so.2
I downloaded libxml-2.0.0-1.i386.rpm and did
rpm -i --test libxml-2.0.0-1.i386.rpm
and it returned
rpm libxml-1.8.1 is newer than libxml-2.0.0-1 and is
already installed.
I have just upgraded by RH
Why not do an "rpm -ivh" instead...have both versions side by side, and
make sure that the 686 version flies for you.
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Peter Kiem wrote:
I've installed the .i386 version of the kernel and completely forgot there
was a .i686 version available.
I would like to install the
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Mike Burger wrote:
Why not do an "rpm -ivh" instead...have both versions side by side, and
make sure that the 686 version flies for you.
Because both packages have the same name?
:-)
(The RPM files have different names, but the package name is the same.)
Well, assuming you have more than one kernel installed, I suppose you
could try uninstalling the .386 version.
I just don't know if --force will break anything or not. G
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Mike Burger wrote:
Why not do an "rpm -ivh"
I've installed the .i386 version of the kernel and completely forgot there
was a .i686 version available.
I would like to install the .i686 version instead but if wont let me do a
"rpm -Fvh" or "rpm -Uvh" of the .i686 kernel rpm.
Is it safe in this case to use a "--force" and will that in fact
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Peter Kiem wrote:
I've installed the .i386 version of the kernel and completely forgot there
was a .i686 version available.
I would like to install the .i686 version instead but if wont let me do a
"rpm -Fvh" or "rpm -Uvh" of the .i686 kernel rpm.
Is it safe in this
Go here:
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHEA-2000-051-01.html
that will give you the correct packages to upgrade RPM to the new version
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, David Trollope wrote:
Hi,
I'm probably going to ask a very stupid question, so before I get flamed, I
have looked at some
Hi Jeff, et al.
Thanks alot - I'l get to this one day this week.
Dave
On 22-Jan-01, you wrote:
Go here:
http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHEA-2000-051-01.html
that will give you the correct packages to upgrade RPM to the new version
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, David Trollope wrote:
Hi,
I'm probably going to ask a very stupid question, so before I get flamed, I
have looked at some FAQs, and I have tried downloading different
versions...but to no avail. Please don't slam me, just point the misguided
soul in the right direction. :-)
I have RedHat 6.1 running, and downloaded
David Trollope [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have RedHat 6.1 running, and downloaded some rpms from rpmfind. Now when I
try to install them, it complains about the rpms being a later version than
the rpm tool can handle. Easy I thought, I'll download the latest rpm
package. Except, that needs
On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, David Trollope wrote:
Hi,
I'm probably going to ask a very stupid question, so before I get flamed, I
have looked at some FAQs, and I have tried downloading different
versions...but to no avail. Please don't slam me, just point the misguided
soul in the right
I have been trying to install a RPM package and it seems I have struck
some type of issue while installing a package.
I am trying to install DBI-perl-bin-0.93-1.i386.rpm
When I try to install it says it's already installed. Then when I try
to uninstall it says it's not installed.
I have used
"Mikkel L. Ellertson" wrote:
Try rpm -e DBI-perl-bin-0.93-1 without the .i386.rpm. RPM lists the
package name
in it's data base, and the package name does not include the arc-type or
the rpm
extension.
Good advice but my guess is that the version info won't be in the package
name
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Mark Bayles wrote:
I have been trying to install a RPM package and it seems I have struck
some type of issue while installing a package.
I am trying to install DBI-perl-bin-0.93-1.i386.rpm
When I try to install it says it's already installed. Then when I try
to uninstall
"Michael Ju. Tokarev" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It controlled by "%define lfs 0" in .spec. Can I say, for example,
"rpm --rebuild kernel-...src.rpm lfn=1" ?
rpm --rebuild --define 'lfs 1' k*src.rpm
--
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
Pasadena, CA USA
Hi!
Two (little?) rpm questions.
Is it possible within .spec file to define some rpm variables
(for example, %requires, maybe %release) based on something
from running system? Example of usage here is trivial:
No. I tried and it worked, sort of. It got the required value when used to
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
"Michael Ju. Tokarev" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It controlled by "%define lfs 0" in .spec. Can I say, for example,
"rpm --rebuild kernel-...src.rpm lfn=1" ?
rpm --rebuild --define 'lfs 1' k*src.rpm
That can seems strange. It seemed that this --define is
Hi!
Two (little?) rpm questions.
Is it possible within .spec file to define some rpm variables
(for example, %requires, maybe %release) based on something
from running system? Example of usage here is trivial:
we can made separate package from pcmcia-cs (currently in kernel)
and make two
62 matches
Mail list logo
