Hello all!!
I have trying samba and i can access and see the samba server from
windows, but i receive the following message when i try to connect from
linux:
added interface ip=192.168.0.54 ...
Password:
Domain=[]OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.7a]
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:10:59PM -0700, R.E. wrote:
> I just insatalled samba 3.0.0 and a weird thing
> happens when a client maps a share. I want to share
> the / root directory not the root home directory.
> When I map the shared directory it takes me to the
> root home dire
--- "R.E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just insatalled samba 3.0.0 and a weird thing
> happens when a client maps a share. I want to share
> the / root directory not the root home directory.
> When I map the shared directory it takes me to the
&
Hello,
I just insatalled samba 3.0.0 and a weird thing
happens when a client maps a share. I want to share
the / root directory not the root home directory.
When I map the shared directory it takes me to the
root home directory istead of the root (/)
directory...here's my scheme:
p.s
Thanks for all the info folks ...
I will read the bash section in my RH 9.0 Unleased then pour over the man bash.
So much to learn so little time...
Llaamaboy
On 18 Oct 2003 01:50:12 -0500 Bret Hughes wrote:
> > > > At this point I want to get rid of eveything samba and start
&
> > > At this point I want to get rid of eveything samba and start over. Whats
> > > the best way to do that?
> >
> > rpm -e $(rpm -qa 'samba-*')
> >
> > Then install a new samba which was built for your platform.
> >
On Fri, 2003-10-17
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply!!
The rpm -e and the 'samba-*' I understand, but where does the $(rpm -qa
'samba-*') come from?
I ask this only because I really want to learn Linux - if I had stuck
with it 2 years ago, I would not have to ask now ...
Agai
Thanks for the reply!!
The rpm -e and the 'samba-*' I understand, but where does the $(rpm -qa
'samba-*') come from?
I ask this only because I really want to learn Linux - if I had stuck
with it 2 years ago, I would not have to ask now ...
Again, thanks in advance
Llaamaboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At this point I want to get rid of eveything samba and start over. Whats
the best way to do that?
rpm -e $(rpm -qa 'samba-*')
Then install a new samba which was built for your platform.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Gordon,
I reached the same conclusion yesterday and I'm busy building the stuff
now ...
But it doesn't satisfy my curiosity ... ;-)
Where does this error message come from (dynamic loader, kernel, ???)
Is it due to incompatibilities between binaries generated by different
compiler versions ?
As
Don't laugh too loudly
I have a linux box at work and I need to print on a network printer.
During the RH 9 install I put in the default Samba package.
I could not get it to work, someone suggested getting Samba 3.0 because
it supported active directries.
Ok, fine. Got the RPM and tri
Paul Libert wrote:
I'm trying to get openLDAP 2.1 and Samba 3.0 on 7.2-enigma (reason :
this machines has Veritas VXfs and VXvm on it and thus I cannot upgrade
the kernel ...)
To achieve this, I've upgraded several packages with RawHide and RedHat
9.0 versions.
Dependencies were OK b
Dears,
I'm trying to get openLDAP 2.1 and Samba 3.0 on 7.2-enigma (reason :
this machines has Veritas VXfs and VXvm on it and thus I cannot upgrade
the kernel ...)
To achieve this, I've upgraded several packages with RawHide and RedHat
9.0 versions.
Dependencies were OK but now, my
follows this message part of samba configuration file
(samba-2.2.5-10) before the file share definitions.
Samba server can be accessed from win2K and winXP but
not from win98 although in the same workgroup. The
error returned on windoze is:
>>>Error 53: The computer name specified in th
, October 07, 2003 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Issues
Richard Crawford wrote:
> I'm running Samba 2.3x on a RH 8 box and sharing out my wife's and my
> home directories so that we can access them from our Windows
computers.
>
> I use the "Map Networ
Richard Crawford wrote:
I'm running Samba 2.3x on a RH 8 box and sharing out my wife's and my
home directories so that we can access them from our Windows computers.
I use the "Map Network Drive" tool under Windows to connect my share on
the Linux box to my Windows comput
I'm running Samba 2.3x on a RH 8 box and sharing out my wife's and my
home directories so that we can access them from our Windows computers.
I use the "Map Network Drive" tool under Windows to connect my share on
the Linux box to my Windows computer as Drive Z:, so I can s
Thomas Fortner wrote:
Hi Yoss,
I've used Samba on Solaris on both Sparc and Intel hardware and it works
almost identically to Samba on Linux. The locations of the Samba files
are different because Red Hat nicely integrates Samba into the OS. On
Solaris, the default is /usr/local/samba. Yo
s
Other side of Asia
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Fortner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 6:42 PM
To: Red Hat Support List
Subject: Samba on Solaris
Hi Yoss,
I've used Samba on Solaris on both Sparc and Intel hardware and it works
almost identically to Samba on Li
Yes the win98 is in the same workgroup defined in
smb.conf.
Although i've always been able to connect from another
workgroup on prior version of samba (on RH7.1)
--- John Nichel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathalie Boulos wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I configure
Nathalie Boulos wrote:
Hello,
I configured samba-2.2.5-10 on RH8 for file sharing.
Access from win2k and winXP is smooth and with no
problem.
Access from win98 gives the following error:
Error 53: The computer name specified in the network
path cannot bee located. Make sure you are specifying
e getting. But if the prior
> version of samba
> worked, you might want to look in the config file and see if
> you can spot
> the setting i am talking about.
>
> Ian
IIRC, that was only an issue with Doze <= W95 OSR1.
-Steve
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailt
At 05:43 AM 10/6/2003, you wrote:
Hello,
I configured samba-2.2.5-10 on RH8 for file sharing.
Access from win2k and winXP is smooth and with no
problem.
Access from win98 gives the following error:
Error 53: The computer name specified in the network
path cannot bee located. Make sure you are
Hello,
I configured samba-2.2.5-10 on RH8 for file sharing.
Access from win2k and winXP is smooth and with no
problem.
Access from win98 gives the following error:
Error 53: The computer name specified in the network
path cannot bee located. Make sure you are specifying
the computer name
Hi Yoss,
I've used Samba on Solaris on both Sparc and Intel hardware and it works
almost identically to Samba on Linux. The locations of the Samba files
are different because Red Hat nicely integrates Samba into the OS. On
Solaris, the default is /usr/local/samba. You may need to wri
Hi Yoss,
I've used Samba on Solaris on both Sparc and Intel hardware and it works
almost identically to Samba on Linux. The locations of the Samba files
are different because Red Hat nicely integrates Samba into the OS. On
Solaris, the default is /usr/local/samba. You may need to wri
Yes, but it is easier to use a couple of workstation class systems running DC services under Windows than it is to do this with Samba. There is a HOWTO on the Samba web site that documents this procedure.
Tom
Thomas S. Fortner
Burleson, Texas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"but we preach C
You are missing a couple of things, mostly the setup on the xp machine,
check this out
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=windows+xp+samba+pdc&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-
8&oe=utf-8&selm=slrnb0rk25.6ua.sy_nttvr%40gurcragntba.pbz&rnum=2 , and
everything should work fine.
Barry Johns
Hi Guys,
I have installed and configured samba on a redhat 8.0 box to act as a
PDC. When I try and add a user to my domain from my WinXP client
machine, I get the following error:
"The user could not be added because of the following error has occured:
The trust relationship between
In your smb.conf make sure you have the samba work group the same as
other computers on your lan and restart the samba services.
James Williams
Network Systems Engineer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Simran Hansrai
Sent: Monday
Hi Guys,
Thanks to Ed Wilts for pointing me to the right direction. In my smb.conf
for samba I turned on the option for it to act as a WINS server and added
the ip for my redhat box in the tcp/ip wins section of my windows nic and
it works now :) \\hostname ...
Thanks again,
--
Simran H
was a
dns lookup when I do \\hostname.
Thanks for your response,
Ed Wilts wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:34:45AM -0700, Simran Hansrai wrote:
I have a redhat 8.0 box that has samba running on it and a solaris 9 box
that is running dns services. Now
WINS side then
maybe? I have not setup anything on that side since I thought this was a
dns lookup when I do \\hostname.
Thanks for your response,
Ed Wilts wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:34:45AM -0700, Simran Hansrai wrote:
I have a redhat 8.0 box that has samba running on it and a
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:34:45AM -0700, Simran Hansrai wrote:
> I have a redhat 8.0 box that has samba running on it and a solaris 9 box
> that is running dns services. Now, when I access my samba account from
> my windows box it works just fine when I do //192.168.0.x from
>
Hi Guys,
I have a redhat 8.0 box that has samba running on it and a solaris 9 box
that is running dns services. Now, when I access my samba account from
my windows box it works just fine when I do //192.168.0.x from
start->run, however when I try //hostname it does not seem to work.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:50:05AM -0400, Patrick Cable II wrote:
> Anywho, I'm wondering if the samba config tools will be any
> different with the arrival of Samba 3.0.0, and if so is there any
> projected date for release? I am working on a project with my
> sc
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 7:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: samba now works
thanks to those that helped with samba...it worked!
now i have another problem...iis webserver using the samba share as its
wwwroot directory...iis sucked and i installed apache server for windows
an
Hello list -
I'm new. My names Patrick, and
I'm a tech coordinator for an elementary school. I do a lot of linux stuff, with
red hat and other distributions too.
Anywho, I'm wondering if the
samba config tools will be any different with the arrival of Samba 3.0.0, and
Did you set the permissions on the folders?
Buck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rene's Caltech Email
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 1:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: samba writable share
im having trouble creating a wri
problem solved...it was the xp client that was the problem...i mapped the
drive through console instead of using explorer which didnt work. xp has
alot of quirks
--
-Rene Enriquez
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The devil will find work for idle hands to do!"
-The Smiths
--
redhat-list mailing list
uns
im having trouble creating a writable share...i can access the share but
cant write...heres my scheme:
[global]
# workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name
workgroup = workgroup
netbios name = linuxbox
#security = user
map to guest = Bad User
[web]
comment = web
path = /var/www/html
writabl
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 20:25, Rhugga wrote:
> Rene's Caltech Email wrote:
>
> >thanks to those that helped with samba...it worked!
> >now i have another problem...iis webserver using the samba share as its
> >wwwroot directory...iis sucked and i installed apache ser
Rene's Caltech Email wrote:
thanks to those that helped with samba...it worked!
now i have another problem...iis webserver using the samba share as its
wwwroot directory...iis sucked and i installed apache server for windows
and now i have to configure it to use the samba share or priva
thanks to those that helped with samba...it worked!
now i have another problem...iis webserver using the samba share as its
wwwroot directory...iis sucked and i installed apache server for windows
and now i have to configure it to use the samba share or private ip. its
just a mtter of learning
no authentication and password is
> asked for in a samba share
> heres my setup attached:
> i want to share the html folder with just read rights.
>
>
>
> thanks ahead of time,
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
guest = ok
read only = ok
-Original Message-
From: Rene's Caltech Email [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: samba share auth
what configuration do i have to do so no authentication and password is
asked for in a
Hi,
Please try this
[EBOOKERS_TEST]
path = /var/www/html/
read only = Yes
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Rene's Caltech Email [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 1:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: samba share auth
what configur
what configuration do i have to do so no authentication and password is
asked for in a samba share
heres my setup attached:
i want to share the html folder with just read rights.
thanks ahead of time,
--
-Rene Enriquez
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The devil will find work for idle hands to do!&
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 18:27, Krautkramer, John wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> I thought about writing something like that but was hoping there was something
> already available, possibly similar to the web site monitor Webalizer.
>
> I'd like to who is using what and when.
I'm not really using anything.
x27; to a posting? I
don't see the obvious method. I'm using cut and paste into a new message.
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone know of a usage monitor for Samba to run on RedHat 9.0? I'd like to
>> keep
>> track of who is using what resources. The RedHa
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 17:30, Krautkramer, John wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know of a usage monitor for Samba to run on RedHat 9.0? I'd like to keep
> track of who is using what resources. The RedHat machine is setup as a server for a
> group of WinNT and Win200 users.
Wha
Hi,
Does anyone know of a usage monitor for Samba to run on RedHat 9.0? I'd like to keep
track of who is using what resources. The RedHat machine is setup as a server for a
group of WinNT and Win200 users.
Thanks!
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks.
I set security = server and it's ok.
***
Cleber P. de Souza
Cia. Metalgraphica Paulista
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em
nome de Gordon Messmer
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 22 de setembro de 2003 19:51
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: Re:
:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: W2KP to RH9: Samba User Group Folder Access
Buck wrote:
> Thank you,
>
> Here is the Samba File (smb.conf)
>
> Buck
>
>
>
> # Samba config file created using SWAT
> # from penguin.Wildlife.lan (192.168.1.1)
> # Date:
Buck wrote:
Thank you,
Here is the Samba File (smb.conf)
Buck
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from penguin.Wildlife.lan (192.168.1.1)
# Date: 2003/09/22 09:31:14
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = WILDLIFE
netbios name = PENGUIN
Netbios name is Penguin???
Is
Cleber P. de Souza wrote:
I have been configuring smb.conf, but the system don't add automatic users
to the system.
The add user script has been configured like this:
Security = share
Password server = 192.168.1.1
Add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -g users -M -c "NT User" -s /dev/null %u
&& /usr/
printable = No
--- Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you,
>
> Here is the Samba File (smb.conf)
>
> Buck
>
>
>
> # Samba config file created using SWAT
> # from penguin.Wildlife.lan (192.168.1.1)
> # Date: 2003/09/22 09:31:14
>
> # G
Thank you,
Here is the Samba File (smb.conf)
Buck
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from penguin.Wildlife.lan (192.168.1.1)
# Date: 2003/09/22 09:31:14
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = WILDLIFE
netbios name = PENGUIN
server string = IBM 300
Let me see the smb.conf.
-Original Message-
From: Buck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 6:44 AM
To: RH List
Subject: W2KP to RH9: Samba User Group Folder Access
I am unable to access anything other than my home folder from my XP
computer.
Linux is setup as
On 20-Sep-2003/16:01 -0600, "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>So the general concensus seems to be that no, there is no way for Samba to
>authenticate via PAM to the /etc/passwd file of system users. Odd, that...
Not quite. You can use the /etc/passwd data
can access, read, write and delete to the
buck or processing folder but not shared. From my XP computer (username
buck and password the same as the Linux user) I have access to buck and
shared, but not processing.
My Network Places shows "buck on Samba Server (Linux)" and "shared on
S
There is another way:
Webmin's samba config interface has a couple of options for:
"Convert Unix users to Samba users"
and
"Configure automatic Unix and Samba user synchronisation"
I haven't played with either, myself, but they look promising.
--
Mike Burge
, there is no way for Samba to
authenticate via PAM to the /etc/passwd file of system users. Odd, that...
Chris, could you share that script with me? All I have is three or four
users here on Windows 2000 notebooks... no NT, no PDC, nothing, and
everyone uses the same password for Linux system
Yahoo IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
264 497-5670 Fax: 264 497-8463
www.netconcepts.ai
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Klein
> Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 7:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Is there
-8463
www.netconcepts.ai
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Klein
> Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 7:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Is there a way for Samba to authenticate via PAM?
>
>
>
Short of invoking the ldap beast...can just unix pwd/account info be used?
When my unix login creds are the same as my samba acct (and they are)...it
would be nice to not have to maintain separate-but-equal pwd files
(smbpasswd and /etc/password).
You're kind of implying two separate/diff
.netconcepts.ai
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodolfo J. Paiz
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Is there a way for Samba to authenticate via PAM?
>
>
> The subject says
The subject says it all, really... is there no way to avoid having separate
user/pass databases for the system and samba?
TIA,
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Hi all,
I have been configuring smb.conf, but the system don't add automatic users
to the system.
The add user script has been configured like this:
Security = share
Password server = 192.168.1.1
Add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -g users -M -c "NT User" -s /dev/null %u
&& /usr/bin/smbpasswd -a %
Mike Klein wrote:
Problem#1: Apache2 that you distribute doesn't seem to have apxs support
enabled.
Install httpd-devel. It's in there.
Problem#2: Your Samba distribution was linked against ssl libraries (ldd
shows this), yet for some reason all of the ssl params in smb.conf give
> Problem#1: Apache2 that you distribute doesn't seem to have apxs support
> enabled. For this reason I needed to get apache src and rebuild. Not a
> problem doing this, but for others it might be. Plus, given that production
> sites will probably build from source anyways...why wasn't this includ
ys...why wasn't this included?
Problem#2: Your Samba distribution was linked against ssl libraries (ldd
shows this), yet for some reason all of the ssl params in smb.conf give
errors to effect of "ignoring unknown parameter"? The funny thing is when I
search for this message on google,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:23:40 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to enable two users from our windows domain to access particular
> share from my samba server. I am new to linux ... please help me out.
>
> I'd setup public share and configured samba lon
Title: Samba Question: Want to enable specific users from windows domain to access samba share.
Hi All,
I want to enable two users from our windows domain to access particular share from my samba server. I am new to linux ... please help me out.
I'd setup public share and configured
Hmm, looks like i got it working by playing with the config file a bit more.
-A RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -m multiport --dport 135,139,445
-j ACCEPT
-A RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT -i eth0 -p udp -m multiport --dport
135,137,138,139,445 -j ACCEPT
those are the two lines i added, which seem
Ian L wrote:
At 05:43 PM 9/15/2003, you wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 20:32, Ian L wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying to set up samba to work with a win2k3 server and a redhat 8
> server. I've got samba 2.x installed. It seems to be working,
although i
> havent finishe
Hi,
>-Original Message-
>From: Ian L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 8:33 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: samba and iptables
>
>
>Hey all,
>
>I'm trying to set up samba to work with a win2k3 server and a redhat 8
>se
At 05:43 PM 9/15/2003, you wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 20:32, Ian L wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying to set up samba to work with a win2k3 server and a redhat 8
> server. I've got samba 2.x installed. It seems to be working, although i
> havent finished setting up all the
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 20:32, Ian L wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm trying to set up samba to work with a win2k3 server and a redhat 8
> server. I've got samba 2.x installed. It seems to be working, although i
> havent finished setting up all the user permissions. When i turn
Hey all,
I'm trying to set up samba to work with a win2k3 server and a redhat 8
server. I've got samba 2.x installed. It seems to be working, although i
havent finished setting up all the user permissions. When i turn iptables
off, i get a password prompt in windows when i click on
this particular
problem. Therefore, I have tried the line again in /etc/fstab
//BALDER/PUB/mnt/balder smbfs
credentials=/etc/samba/smb_cred 0 0
This particular line did not work. I also tried
'auto,credentials=/etc/samba/smb_cred' (without the '
Jason-
It looks like you configuration is correct, I have a very similar
setup running over here. You may want to take security out of the
equation I would change the file to something like 644 because if
Samba isn't running as root then it's not going to be able to read the
file. You
m not setting up an unsecure box for someone else to jump on
and use.
Anyways, I am trying to setup Samba so my windoze pc's can get access to
the internet and also so everyone can share files and printers without
any hassels. Plus I did remove what I had setup in my iptables before I
left, i
Hi all,
Sorry if this is off-topic, but I am having a simple problem with mounting
a networked file share with Samba. I am running RH 9.0 with all of the
updates.
I am trying to connect to the filestore that is part of our M$ Windoze 2000
network. I have put an entry in my /etc
I have around 20 users connected to my redhat 7.2 server using samba. My
question is when I do a ps -uax it shows that all the samba child
processes are running as root not the actual user. And top shows samba
taking up over %90 of the cpu. Does anyone have any suggestions as to
what is going on
see http://rhce2b.com/
Regards,
Vitaly Karasik, RHCE
***
Information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual
or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
> On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 09:06, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> >
> > > Removed my resolv.conf file off of Linux Box.
> >
> > I have no idea why you would do that. Anybody else know?
>
> He's prepping for the troubleshooting section of the RHCE exam. ;-)
*grin*
I'm getting ready
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 09:06, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
>
> > Removed my resolv.conf file off of Linux Box.
>
> I have no idea why you would do that. Anybody else know?
He's prepping for the troubleshooting section of the RHCE exam. ;-)
--
Jason Dixon, RHCE
DixonGroup Consultin
> Hi all,
>
> Removed my resolv.conf file off of Linux Box.
I have no idea why you would do that. Anybody else know?
>
> Added two entires to my IPTABLES file to open up ports 137-139 for tcp &
> udp.
> This is the one that I really have a question on. Here or the two
> lines that I added.
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 03:04:25PM -0500, cajun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm back again. This time I am a lot closer. Just have a couple of
> things I need help with and some real good advice. This will be kind of
> long so please bare with me. This is a recap of everything that I have
> done t
only = No
[cajun]
path = /home/cajun
read only = No
When I try and connect using the above config file I connect on the
Linux Box and can see my share from the Windoze PC:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] samba]# smbclient //cajunhome/cajun -U cajun
added interface ip=192.168.1.1 bcast=192.
goes.
Carefull Samba, as a unix/linux implementation of the Microsoft SMB
protocol, uses the same ports as Microsoft Windows file/printer sharing.
Disabling firewall blocking of these ports would leave any windows clients
on your network vulnerable to a plethora of nasty programs on the &
on't know how your
> network is setup or if that's possible but if you are going to do it,
> it would be best to make sure the machines do not have an Internet
> connect while the firewall is open. At least this way you could
> quickly eliminate the firewall from the equation.
al Message-
From: cajun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Help !!! PLEASE !!
Hi Nick,
Yes they are, actually right now, I am trying to load Samba on the
same
machine as I am running the firewall. I'm using my Linux
Hi Nick,
Yes they are, actually right now, I am trying to load Samba on the same
machine as I am running the firewall. I'm using my Linux box as the
firewall. I am in the process of seperating it out to another PC that
will be on the same LAN.
Is this what my problem is?? If it is I
: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samba Help !!! PLEASE !!
teddy wrote:
>Also their is a tool that u can use its one of the packages in
redhat9 its
>real easy to use should be in settings somewhere
>
>
>-- Original Message ---
>Fro
teddy wrote:
Also their is a tool that u can use its one of the packages in redhat9 its
real easy to use should be in settings somewhere
-- Original Message ---
From: "teddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:47:37 -0400
Subject
I believe an older ver of Webmin had a plug to SWAT. But why do that? Webmin
seems to handle Samba setup far better than SWAT. I've had changes made in
SWAT not work properly.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: Craig Herring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL P
Also their is a tool that u can use its one of the packages in redhat9 its
real easy to use should be in settings somewhere
-- Original Message ---
From: "teddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:47:37 -0400
Subject: RE: Samba
You have to make sure you create Samba users its not the same as linux users.
Maybe thats why you are getting login failures.
-- Original Message ---
From: "Jason Tesser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:47:53 -0500
S
1 - 100 of 1754 matches
Mail list logo
