[Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread redleg_8
I have selected hardware, controller, duplexer, antenna, and location. SERA has provided me with available frequency pairs and a blank application. What I CAN'T locate any information on is how to obtain a legal callsign for a individually owned repeater. Thanks, Dean KJ4LII

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Paul Plack
Dean, you have one: KJ4LII/R. Discreet repeater callsigns have been gone for decades. The repeater's callsign these days is typically the owner, another individual designated by the owner as the licensee, or in some cases a club callsign. Controllers are often programmed to appends /R to the

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Joe Montierth
How about KJ4LII? Should work OK. --- On Sun, 5/3/09, redleg_8 redle...@yahoo.com wrote: From: redleg_8 redle...@yahoo.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, May 3, 2009, 6:16 PM

RE: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Actually, the /R is not ALLOWED by FCC rules any longer. Mike WM4B From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Plack Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 2:20 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater

RE: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Bob M.
USC 47 part 97 (FCC amateur service) rule 97.119(c) quoted below: (c) One or more indicators may be included with the call sign. Each indicator must be separated from the call sign by the slant mark (/) or by any suitable word that denotes the slant mark. If an indicator is self-assigned,

RE: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread mwbesemer
'R' is assigned by ITU to European and Asiatic Russia. Mike WM4B On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:28 AM , Bob M. wrote: USC 47 part 97 (FCC amateur service) rule 97.119(c) quoted below: (c) One or more indicators may be included with the call sign. Each indicator must be separated from the

[Repeater-Builder] Re: W1GAN and square duplexers aka homebrew duplexer

2009-05-04 Thread Ed Bathgate
I built a paint can 6 meter helical coil duplexer, and also built an 8 stub heliax 6 meter duplexer. The mechanics don't seem all that complicated, but getting the rejection and insertion loss you want can take a lot of messing with it. The heliax was difficult to find. Traded a large tray of

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Mike Pugh
Mike Besemer (WM4B) wrote: Actually, the /R is not ALLOWED by FCC rules any longer. This is interesting, can you show us where in the rules this is?

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread mwbesemer
§97.119 Station identification. (c) One or more indicators may be included with the call sign. Each indicator must be separated from the call sign by the slant mark (/) or by any suitable word that denotes the slant mark. If an indicator is self-assigned, it must be included before, after,

[Repeater-Builder] Re: desense question

2009-05-04 Thread Al Wolfe
The amp is a UHF PA off a mobile rig, and I needed about 50 feet of RG58U to attenuate the signal from the repeater into the amp module. Not good, probably better to bypass (not use) the 15 watt amplifier and drive the external amp direct from the exciter. Not a thing wrong with using a

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: desense question

2009-05-04 Thread mwbesemer
I think the issue was that it's RG-58. Mike WM4B On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:15 AM , Al Wolfe wrote: The amp is a UHF PA off a mobile rig, and I needed about 50 feet of RG58U to attenuate the signal from the repeater into the amp module. Not good, probably better to bypass (not use) the

[Repeater-Builder] /R was: 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Doug Rehman
The Russian Federation is a member of CEPT (European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations) which has reciprocal operating authority with the US. The CEPT document outlining operating (http://www.erodocdb.dk/docs/doc98/official/pdf/TR6101.PDF) shows that the call sign

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread mwbesemer
Ask yourself these questions: Is the indicator Self-Assigned? (Well, if the FCC didn't give it to you, it MUST be Self-Assigned.) Is the prefix assigned to another country? If you answer yes to both these questions, the it IS specifically stated in the rules. We wouldn't be having this

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread no6b
At 5/4/2009 05:54, you wrote: §97.119 Station identification. (c) One or more indicators may be included with the call sign. Each indicator must be separated from the call sign by the slant mark (/) or by any suitable word that denotes the slant mark. If an indicator is self-assigned, it

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread mwbesemer
Seems pretty black-and-white to me (unlike a lot of things in Part 97). Personally, I'm happy to do away with it. It shortens the ID a bit and eliminates stating the obvious. ID'ing with /R is kinda like like saying 'This is WM4B for ID' (as opposed to... ?). I was not aware that some

RE: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread John Transue
in the rules this is? http://groups.yahoo.com/start;_ylc=X3oDMTJub25qY3N2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BF9w AzMEZ3JwSWQDMTA0MTY4BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA2MzEwOARzZWMDbmNtb2QEc2xrA2dyb3Vw czIEc3RpbWUDMTI0MTQ0MTE4Mw-- __ NOD32 4051 (20090504) Information __ This message was checked

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Larry Wagoner
At 09:37 AM 5/4/2009, you wrote: Ask yourself these questions: Ask yourself this *ONE* question. Is /R the way Russian stations identify themselves? No? Then it is NOT an ASSIGNED identifier, nor is it an attempt to confuse or hide identity. It is, therefore, PERFECTLY LEGAL and APROPRIATE.

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Mike Pugh
mwbese...@cox.net wrote: 'R' is assigned by ITU to European and Asiatic Russia. Mike WM4B On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:28 AM , Bob M. wrote: USC 47 part 97 (FCC amateur service) rule 97.119(c) quoted below: (c) One or more indicators may be included with the call sign. Each

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Piston Cap Source (a good deal)

2009-05-04 Thread Bob M.
I've got a few myself and they ARE really that good. Easy to adjust, very stable, solid as a rock. I'm using one as the gimmick capacitor in a Heliax duplexer. Other than putting my hand near it, nothing seems to make it change capacitance. The only odd thing about them is their mounting

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Converting a TKR-750/850 for Amateur Usage

2009-05-04 Thread ptt_pupil
Thanks all for your inputs! Quick question: the programming software will go down to the amateur band no problem? It won't lock you out? --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ken Arck ah...@... wrote: At 01:40 PM 4/16/2009, ptt_pupil wrote: Can anyone tell me how you can convert a

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Converting a TKR-750/850 for Amateur Usage

2009-05-04 Thread NORM KNAPP
I have never had a problem getting either into the ham bands. - Original Message - From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon May 04 12:16:27 2009 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re:

[Repeater-Builder] Repeater related items for sale

2009-05-04 Thread kk2ed
I have a few repeater related items FS: ARR (Advanced Receiver Research) SP220VDG 220MHz GaAs Fet switchable preamp. In like new condition with paperwork. One minor scratch on the rear, otherwise appears new. Mounting screw holes and pwr connections look like they were never used. Tested on my

[Repeater-Builder] Wanted: GE 19B226748G1 BANDPASS BOARD

2009-05-04 Thread w4sef
Hi all, I am in need of a 19D423249G1 board. I found out this is needed to make the PLL exciter work on the lower end of the two meter band in the 145 range. This is the Band-Pass board that plugs in the the GE Master II exciter. I do NOT want the G2 board. My mistake. 73s Steve W4SEF

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Redd Legg
I have a resolution to this issue.  I am applying for a club callsign to use on the repeater.  There are several of us that will use it and we just have to go thru the gyrations of setting up a formal club structure. Actually, the callsign will be used on one fixed and one portable linked

[Repeater-Builder] Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread Nate Duehr
Nightmare f-ing Hams! story from this weekend: I went to a site this weekend, and the new Amateur repeater in the new building the hams are moving into had 200' of 1/2 Andrews hardline on it that I don't even know how it was operating... it looked like someone had taken a ballpeen hammer to it at

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Paul Plack
This is one of those willful fabrications of gray areas that clutter rule discussions. This is why nobody discusses remote bases in polite company anymore. With all due respect, Larry, your ONE QUESTION is a test unrelated to what the rule says. The rule itself says it applies to the

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread Chuck Kelsey
I know a radio shop that does installs like that. It's been in business for over 30 years. Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: Nate Duehr n...@natetech.com To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 2:50 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Ham installation

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread mwbesemer
I'm in conversation with my O-O Coordinator now. He's digging his archives for the 'official read' from the FCC, but seems to recall it being described as being too gray to enforce, as written. I stand by my initial assessment as the the legality of using /R, but also understand that it's

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread mwbesemer
Got one like that here too. It ain't just the hams that are amateurs! Mike WM4B On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:22 PM , Chuck Kelsey wrote: I know a radio shop that does installs like that. It's been in business for over 30 years. Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: Nate Duehr

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread Paul Kelley N1BUG
Got one here too! Honestly you should see some of the professionally installed repeaters with mobile radios screwed to plywood, wires dangling everywhere, exposed electrical connections, repeater buildings with rusty metal sheets for siding flapping in the wind, bent leaning towers (installed

[Repeater-Builder] Kendecom repeater....

2009-05-04 Thread Grady
I am trying to hook up a remote base and a temp sensor to a Kendecom Mark 4, anyone that can be of help will be greatly appreceated. I need all the info and help I can get. Thanks, Grady W4GLE..

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Kendecom repeater....

2009-05-04 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 12:17 PM 05/04/09, you wrote: I am trying to hook up a remote base and a temp sensor to a Kendecom Mark 4, anyone that can be of help will be greatly appreceated. I need all the info and help I can get. Thanks, Grady W4GLE.. What controller is in the Kendecomm now? The stock one didn't do

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread Kris Kirby
On Mon, 4 May 2009, Nate Duehr wrote: There are GOOD ham radio tenants, and bad ones... that's for sure. If it were up to me, I'd have made ONE phone call to this guy saying his repeater was no longer welcome at the site, disconnected it, changed the door code, and set that mobiles in a

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread Brian Raker
As long as the presentation is good (i.e. good/proper cabling, neatly organized, etc) it really shouldn't matter whether the lessee is using mobiles (like I do in my CDR500 [two CDM750s and duplexers in a steel box] or a full-out purpose-built repeater system (like an MTR2000, Quantar or whatnot).

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread Barry
Interesting read , In this part of the world the regulation regarding cable installs is very stringent and as one licensed to do such things is a constant source of amusement for me , just because you have an amateur license does not mean you have to install like one :) I know of commercial

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: desense question

2009-05-04 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 06:07 AM 05/04/09, you wrote: The amp is a UHF PA off a mobile rig, and I needed about 50 feet of RG58U to attenuate the signal from the repeater into the amp module. Not good, probably better to bypass (not use) the 15 watt amplifier and drive the external amp direct from the

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: desense question

2009-05-04 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Mike, I assume the purpose of the paint can is to act as a Faraday cage? Is it attached to the common-point ground system or left freestanding? 73, Mike WM4B From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Morris WA6ILQ Sent:

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread Nate Duehr
On Mon, 4 May 2009 14:57:34 -0500 (CDT), Kris Kirby k...@catonic.us said: On Mon, 4 May 2009, Nate Duehr wrote: There are GOOD ham radio tenants, and bad ones... that's for sure. If it were up to me, I'd have made ONE phone call to this guy saying his repeater was no longer welcome at

[Repeater-Builder] WANTED: db403X cans

2009-05-04 Thread Chris Curtis
Does anyone have some cans from a db4030 or db4032 duplxer ? Just need a couple cans and harness Thanks! Chris Kb0wlf

[Repeater-Builder] MVP Power Supply help

2009-05-04 Thread Charles Lowery
I have a MVP Power Supply on a small repeater and the voltage is 17 V on receive. VR1 is bad and not turning on the transistor to regulate it in receive. The manual does not tell me a usable part number except from GE. Can anyone give me the zener's voltage value or a suitable replacement?

Re: [Repeater-Builder] MVP Power Supply help

2009-05-04 Thread Chuck Kelsey
What is the GE part number? Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: Charles Lowery clow...@va.net To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 5:53 PM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] MVP Power Supply help I have a MVP Power Supply on a small repeater and the voltage is

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread Maire-Radios
knew a radio shop in Sarasota Fl that did that kind of work on a repeater system on an 640 foot tower 800Mhz. good job. - Original Message - From: Barry To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 4:23 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Ham

Re: [Repeater-Builder] MVP Power Supply help

2009-05-04 Thread clow...@va.net
Sorry I should have included it. 19A115528P6 Thanks Charles, NM4V Quoting Chuck Kelsey wb2...@roadrunner.com: What is the GE part number? Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: Charles Lowery clow...@va.net To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009

Re: [Repeater-Builder] MVP Power Supply help

2009-05-04 Thread Chuck Kelsey
New London has the GE part available for $1 ea. Still looking for a cross. Chuck - Original Message - From: clow...@va.net To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:09 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] MVP Power Supply help Sorry I should have included it.

Re: [Repeater-Builder] MVP Power Supply help

2009-05-04 Thread Chuck Kelsey
No luck on a cross. Sorry. Chuck WB2EDV - Original Message - From: Chuck Kelsey wb2...@roadrunner.com To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:11 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] MVP Power Supply help New London has the GE part available for $1 ea. Still

[Repeater-Builder] Re: MVP Power Supply help

2009-05-04 Thread Geoff Booth.
If my memory serves me correctly. The cross reference number is a 1N4736A ZENER DIODE. 73, Geoff, G8DZJ.

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread T.J.
The funny/sad thing is I've seen professional installs that are on the same par as that also.  It's hard to believe people get away charging for these type installs and stay in business.  In fact I was at one of my work sites today installing a PDR3500 as a temporary repeater and saw a similar

[Repeater-Builder] RE: TASMA makes a move to take over coordinating responsibilities for the 440 band

2009-05-04 Thread Eric Lemmon
This could get real interesting, real fast, since the big difference between SCRRBA and TASMA band plans is whether the 70cm repeater inputs should be above or below the outputs. They are opposite polarities! 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY -Original Message- From: Jeff

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread Mike Mullarkey
I have to agree that the first version Mototrbo XPR series repeater looks to be a set of mobile radios just like the crap ICOM puts out called D-Star. However, they have the board that upgrades the MTR2000 repeater to make it TDMA and that is a real repeater. It would be hard to find anything that

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread Eric Lemmon
Kris, There's a bit of disinformation in your message. The GR1225 contains a full-duplex R1225 transceiver, which includes a controller inside the single chassis. The others are pairs of mobile radios. 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Larry Wagoner
At 01:52 PM 5/4/2009, you wrote: With all due respect, Larry, your ONE QUESTION is a test unrelated to what the rule says. The rule itself says it applies to the additional self-assigned identifier separated by the /, so the question is the conflict posed by R, not /R. If the / was included

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: desense question

2009-05-04 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Thanks Mike. I'll file that trick away for future use! Mike WM4B _ From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Morris WA6ILQ Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 7:10 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE:

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Paul Plack
Larry, I hear ya, and this is probably what the folks who consider this vague and unenforceable refer to. I'm sure we'll be hearing /R for years to come. In fact, before it goes out of use, I expect to start hearing new Technician-class licensees start asking on-air, Hey...what's that wierd

RE: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Paul, I've actually HEARD comments about CW ID's (not on any of my systems thankfully. but up in the ATL area) from several repeater users. Something about not being able to tell what repeater they're on. (I guess the frequency isn't a good enough clue.) Kinda makes me want to take

RE: [Repeater-Builder] RE: TASMA makes a move to take over coordinating responsibilities for the 440 band

2009-05-04 Thread wa6vpl
Eric, I think you are referring to the differences between northern and southern California 440 coordination administered by SCRRBA and NARCC. The northern coordinator is NARCC (Northern Amateur Relay Council of California - http://www.narcc.org/). Northern CA is low output and southern CA

Re: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project

2009-05-04 Thread Paul Plack
LOL...this is the real point of APRS. We need to display callsigns on the front of the user's radio! You know, like D-Star, only analog... - Original Message - From: Mike Besemer (WM4B) To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 7:47 PM Subject: RE:

Re: [Repeater-Builder] RE: TASMA makes a move to take over coordinating responsibilities for the 440 band

2009-05-04 Thread MCH
There was one nationwide (minus the polarity) until NARCC changed... Joe M. wa6vpl wrote: Eric, I think you are referring to the differences between northern and southern California 440 coordination administered by SCRRBA and NARCC. The northern coordinator is NARCC (Northern

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Ham installation quality/non-quality

2009-05-04 Thread Ryan
Totally agree with Nate, Hams can talk great distances using the least expensive means. and have seen my fair share of ham and commercial installsm usally revolves making the sale at any cost. this is the 2-way radio industry everyone is cutting everyones prices. Personally hams should be the

RE: [Repeater-Builder] RE: TASMA makes a move to take over coordinating responsibilities for the 440 band

2009-05-04 Thread Eric Lemmon
Oops! You're absolutely correct. Must be that continuous loss of brain cells that teetotalers keep warning me about... 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of wa6vpl Sent: Monday, May 04,

[Repeater-Builder] MSF5000 440 UHF

2009-05-04 Thread Bob Luttrull
Hi all I am having a problem with my repeater. It is a MSF5000 440 UHF 110W. I was told that it might have crystal hairs in the TX duplexer. People are telling me that I need to disassemble the duplexer and clean it with a toothbrush to get the crystals out and use a nolock on the adjustment

Re: [Repeater-Builder] RE: TASMA 70 cm band coordination

2009-05-04 Thread no6b
At 5/4/2009 17:46, you wrote: This could get real interesting, real fast, since the big difference between SCRRBA and TASMA band plans is whether the 70cm repeater inputs should be above or below the outputs. They are opposite polarities! 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY TASMA has a 70 cm bandplan?