Hi Paul
Just one of the many lurkers here.
In the Washington DC area The Green Mountain Repeater Association has 2
repeater the the club calls W3GMR and K3GMR look them up and you will see the
assigned trustees.
Bill N3JBX
Paul Plack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any r
er@yahoogroups.com"[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 8:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
Paul,
How would that make the paper repeaters disappear? Also, I doubt if you could
get any professional person to do that job for the dues collected.
Paul
_
]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
> Yes, we must humor the coordinators if we desire becoming coordinated.
> The system used in some states is kinda behind the times compared to
> others. And from what I have heard, in some a
Yes, we must humor the coordinators if we desire becoming coordinated.
The system used in some states is kinda behind the times compared to
others. And from what I have heard, in some areas it is almost impossible
to get coordinated. Some insist that you "must" join their group to even
ge
el Ron & Paul's idea is a good one!
-- Original Message --
Received: Mon, 19 May 2008 07:19:33 PM PDT
From: "Mike Mullarkey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
> Well all of us commercial system operators have to deal with t
Paul Plack wrote:
> 
> You're probably right on the money part.
>
> In my admittedly limited experience, (four states, three different
> coordinators,) one of the perks of being elected to some coordinating
> bodies seems to be grabbing available pairs out of turn when they open
> and/or pu
m. If the coordinator wasn't a ham, that couldn't happen.
Now, if the coordinator's brother-in-law was a ham...still might.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Finch
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 8:48 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-B
om
> <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, May 19, 2008 6:41 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
>
> Joe,
>
> I know of some Hams who have talked to Riley about setting up standards
> for coordinator
ich the term has
>>> not had any meaning to the FCC since the "WR" callsigns went
>>> away. As long as we use the terms the FCC expects in any official
>>> communication with the agency itself, I guess it doesn't hurt to
>>> humor the coordinato
:53 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
You know, Ron, you just gave me an inspiration.
What if the coordinators themselves were not hams, and not eligible to operate
ham repeaters? Imagine how many "paper repeaters" and how much
half Of
Paul Plack
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 6:53 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
You know, Ron, you just gave me an inspiration.
What if the coordinators themselves were not hams, and not eligible to operate
ham repeaters? Imagine ho
rs instead of hams, and
pay them out of the dues. Hmmm...
73,
Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wright
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
Joe,
I know of some Hams who have talke
>
>> 73,
>> Paul, AE4KR
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "Wayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To:
>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 12:43 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
>>
>>
>>> There are quite a f
ng, though.
>
> 73,
> Paul, AE4KR
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Wayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 12:43 AM
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
>
>
>> There are quite a few repeaters usin
l communication with the agency
itself, I guess it doesn't hurt to humor the coordinators. Sure does make
things confusing, though.
73,
Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: "Wayne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Repea
There are quite a few repeaters using club call signs rather than an
individuals call sign.
I used our club call sign on my first repeater, and am using my own on my
repeater here.
According to the application for coordination here in Texas, I will be
the trustee of the repeater.
Howe
ith the FCC or try to interpret the regs with
> undefined or incorrect vocabulary, misunderstandings arise.
>
> ("Remote base" comes to mind.)
>
> 73,
> Paul, AE4KR
>
> - Original Message -
> *From: *_MCH_ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mail
nal Message -
From: MCH <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com
<mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 8:24 PM
<mailto:Repeater-Builder@ya
;
> - Original Message -
> *From:* MCH <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, May 16, 2008 8:24 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordi
("Remote base" comes to mind.)
73,
Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: MCH
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
A licensee is a person who is authorized to do something.
A trust
How could they stop it when they are still issuing vanity club calls
(which a local club just got one of within the last month or so)?
BTW, all licenses have trustees. All repeaters have trustees. All
coordinations have trustees. When the time comes there is no trustee for
any one of these, the
A licensee is a person who is authorized to do something.
A trustee is a person *entrusted* with something.
(That's the legal definition of a trustee)
That something could be a repeater or a coordination or a license, or
any combination of these. In the case of my repeaters, I'm trustee of
all
Paul Plack wrote:
> Are there any repeaters left using club callsigns? If so, those would be
> the only repeaters which still have trustees.
Lots of them Paul, on purpose even.
Look up W0CRA or W0CDS.
W0CRA = Colorado Repeater Association
W0CDS = Colorado D-STAR Association
In the former, it'
ECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com
<mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:13 PM
<mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]c
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
Paul,
I would think it would more correct to say the call on a repeater or other
station is not necessarily the trustee. My call is on my repeater and I am
also the trustee.
73, ron, n9ee/r
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com
<mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:04AM
<mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [
ould be the only repeaters which still
> have trustees.
>
> Paul, AE4KR
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Ron Wright
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] coord
Every repeater has a trustee just like every license has a trustee. It
may not be the same person, but often times it is. My local coordination
entity requires that *IF* the trustee of the coordination is a club, the
trustee is the trustee for the FCC license.
Now, can we get off the semantics
> - Original Message -----
> From: Ron Wright
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
>
>
>
> > Huh? ALL repeaters MUST have a license
> trustee!!! What ever ca
trustee for it.
Are there any repeaters left using club callsigns? If so, those would be the
only repeaters which still have trustees.
Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wright
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [
Awesome Font size Ron!
-Steve
- Original Message -
From: Ron Wright
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] coordination?
I'm not sure the callsign of the repeater is the trustee. I as a trustee of
m
Huh? ALL repeaters MUST have a license trustee!!! What ever callsign
it ID's with is the trustee, whether club or not.
I agree each license has a trustee and only a person can be a trustee.
A club can own I guess one can say a callsign and a designated officer
of the club can desingate the t
Ron Wright wrote:
>
> I'm not sure the callsign of the repeater is the trustee. I as a
> trustee of my ham station can have another ham use my station using
> their callsign. If operating outside their license, but within mine
> they must include my call with theirs, but if repeater is operat
I'm not sure the callsign of the repeater is the trustee. I as a
trustee of my ham station can have another ham use my station using
their callsign. If operating outside their license, but within mine
they must include my call with theirs, but if repeater is operating
within say a Tech's li
According to 47CFR97, a trustee is the licensed person
of record for club stations.
Repeaters can be operated by any class license (valid
for the frequency, of course). While the person who's
callsign is on the repeater's ID could be considered a
trustee, there's no requirement for that title as f
Bob M. wrote:
> Regarding trustees: club stations certainly need one.
> I think it's just customary even for privately owned
> repeaters to have trustees, even if it's in name only,
> and it could certainly be the station owner, but it
> doesn't have to be. A repeater could be owned by a
> novice
Depends on the repeater coordinator(s). Most as long as the repeaeter
stats (freq, location, height, power) do not change they care less whose
call is on the repeater or who owns it. Some do not allow coordination
to be transferred, same repeater, but different owner must be
recoordinator,
Trustee issues aside, if the repeater moved, then it
should be re-coordinated. But again, it depends on
your area's coordination guidelines. Some are real
sticklers; others don't care what you do.
Regarding trustees: club stations certainly need one.
I think it's just customary even for privately
Depends on the coordinator's policies.
Joe M.
w2drh wrote:
> I think I must be confused. I was under the misapprehension that if
> one modified the physical location (moved the repeater), had their
> license expire, moved out of the area (where direct control of the
> repeater was not possible),
How can there be a trustee for a privately owned repeater? I
understand the necessity for a group owned or club owned unit. When it
is coordinated under a single ham as owner, his call has expired, and it
is not even at the listed site, I would think that presents a problem.
Am I wrong?
Bob
It probably varies according to the guidelines of the
coordinating group in the repeater's coverage area.
Certainly if the footprint changes (emitter moves,
changes power, antenna, feedline, height, antenna
type, etc) you will probably need to resubmit
paperwork to that effect. In some areas, repe
I think I must be confused. I was under the misapprehension that if
one modified the physical location (moved the repeater), had their
license expire, moved out of the area (where direct control of the
repeater was not possible), or modified the system, that the
coordination would be canceled or n
THANK YOU KEVIN!
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Custer
To: Repeater Builder
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:37 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Coordination Thread (Please Read- Do Not Reply)
Recently, I asked you folks that are participating in the now lengthy
:
Repeater-Builder Coordination
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/repeater-builder-coordination/
Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT reply to this message on the list.
Personal Mail always welcomed.
Regards,
Kevin Custer
List Owner
Kevin and Group,
My apologizes, I saw your email requesting this thread to stop but I saw
this as a need for all Hams. I am a 440 Coordinator in Texas, I set up a
group for the discussion of these problems. Please read the requirements
and rules below, if you can't live with them please don't jo
Does your coordinator have the access info to try it for themselves?
What are they basing the decoordination on? Not on the air?
Joe M.
Coy Hilton wrote:
>
> HI Gang
> I have had one of my 2 meter repeaters coordinated as a closed
> repeater for at least two years. Three times last year I was
In congested areas this is going to be a fact of life.
All your coordinator wants probably is a quick on air demo.
Is the guy local? He should already know the PL tones etc.
Coy Hilton wrote:
>
>
> HI Gang
> I have had one of my 2 meter repeaters coordinated as a closed
> repeater for at leas
HI Gang
I have had one of my 2 meter repeaters coordinated as a closed
repeater for at least two years. Three times last year I was sent a
email asking if the repeater was on the air and three times I
answered "yes" each time. I had even had a on going discussion about
having multiple transmi
Folks,
Please move the Coordination Discussion to the new forum designed for
such topics:
http://repeatercoordination.org/
Thanks...
Kevin Custer
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from thi
Sounds like something the TXVHFFM Society would do... They don't even
want to share data with the other coordinating body in TX.
TGundo 2003 wrote:
> This is from the March 2005 MIARC newsletter (I have *** the names to
> protect the innocent) available for public viewing on their website:
>
50 matches
Mail list logo
