Hi Michael,
One correction to attributions:
Merged in Sage 3.3.rc3:
#4688: Alex Ghitza: wrap pari functions idealstar and ideallog
[Reviewed by John Cremona]
should be
#4688: Maite Aranes, Alex Ghitza: wrap pari functions idealstar and ideallog
[Reviewed by John Cremona]
Best,
Alex
--
I've recently (yesterday) turned my work MacBook into a dual-boot MacOSX and
Archlinux machine. I built 3.3.rc3 from scratch under Linux, without
problems and with all tests passing. I updated to 3.3.rc3 under OSX,
without problems except one small doctest failure due to the fact that I
forgot I
On Feb 21, 12:15 am, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Alex,
One correction to attributions:
Merged in Sage 3.3.rc3:
#4688: Alex Ghitza: wrap pari functions idealstar and ideallog
[Reviewed by John Cremona]
should be
#4688: Maite Aranes, Alex Ghitza: wrap pari
On Feb 21, 12:21 am, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
I've recently (yesterday) turned my work MacBook into a dual-boot MacOSX and
Archlinux machine. I built 3.3.rc3 from scratch under Linux, without
problems and with all tests passing. I updated to 3.3.rc3 under OSX,
Another example is with matplotlib. As I can read somewhere on the
web, there are different opinions about using the SAGE plot
capabilities rather than this external package.
Sage's 2d plotting just uses matplotlib, which is a standard package
included in SAge. Matplotlib's pylab
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.3.rc3 is out and available in the usual place at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.3/
We merged a bunch of fixes and hopefully all doctest issues will have
been resolved. So far only two issues have cropped up that
That was the way I used to do it when I discovered the solution_dict
param.
So, I started using the dictionaries to do substitution even in
complex expressions... The result was to wait so much time!
On the contrary, I found that the subs(expr, x=value) was S much
faster (are the
On Feb 21, 12:30 pm, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I started using the dictionaries to do substitution even in
complex expressions... The result was to wait so much time!
That sounds bad, can you give an example? Or create one so that others
can investigate it?
result =
Hi Maurizio,
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
unfortunately, I don't have the code with me right now (I could give
you on monday), but I'm pretty sure it is something REALLY
straightforward and not optimized, like this:
def coll(expr,s):
Dear all,
It seems that I'm having a pexpect problem on my computation server. Maybe you
already know that but it is not deterministic, ie doctest hangs in some more
or less randomly chosen file. I've followed the instructions on
Am I the only person for whom sage -upgrade always fails? It
downloads lots of stuff, builds lots of stuff, and leaves me with an
un-runnable sage which doesn't know whether it is the old version or
the new.
In this case my working 3.3.rc2 was upgraded. Afterwards, the banner
still says
On Feb 21, 6:23 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Feb 21, 6:10 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
Am I the only person for whom sage -upgrade always fails? It
downloads lots of stuff, builds lots of stuff, and leaves me with an
un-runnable sage which
On Feb 21, 6:10 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
Am I the only person for whom sage -upgrade always fails? It
downloads lots of stuff, builds lots of stuff, and leaves me with an
un-runnable sage which doesn't know whether it is the old version or
the new.
On 21 Feb., 15:27, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
rm -rf devel/sage
oops:
rm -rf devel/sage*
Note that this will nuke all your changes, but that should be fairly
obvious :)
./sage -f spkt/standard/sage-x.y.z.spkg
And I guess in the previous line it is
On Feb 21, 6:36 am, Simon King k...@mathematik.uni-jena.de wrote:
On 21 Feb., 15:27, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
rm -rf devel/sage
oops:
rm -rf devel/sage*
Note that this will nuke all your changes, but that should be fairly
obvious :)
./sage -f
On Feb 21, 2009, at 6:23 AM, mabshoff wrote:
On Feb 21, 6:10 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
Am I the only person for whom sage -upgrade always fails? It
downloads lots of stuff, builds lots of stuff, and leaves me with an
un-runnable sage which doesn't know
Thanks for the diagnosis and suggestions. Evidently I did the upgrade
from a clone, one I made yesterday to review one of those patches
Suggestion: since the upgrade already gives a prompt and will not
continue unless you reply yes, why not add to that prompt a line
saying don't go any
On Feb 21, 2009, at 3:30 AM, Maurizio wrote:
That was the way I used to do it when I discovered the solution_dict
param.
So, I started using the dictionaries to do substitution even in
complex expressions... The result was to wait so much time!
On the contrary, I found that the subs(expr,
Hi,
Looking around, it seems Sage does not yet implement harmonic numbers
(except via SymPy)? If anyone is interested, I benchmarked a few
different algorithms and blogged about it here:
http://fredrik-j.blogspot.com/2009/02/how-not-to-compute-harmonic-numbers.html
Besides (generalized)
I can't quite figure out how to access optional programs
using Sage.app. For example, if I start sage via the
command line './sage-3.3.rc2/sage' and then fire up the
notebook, I can access Octave and compute the eigenvalues
of a random 5x5 matrix using something like the following
%octave
A
On Feb 21, 8:14 am, mark mcclure mcmcc...@unca.edu wrote:
Hi Mark,
I can't quite figure out how to access optional programs
using Sage.app. For example, if I start sage via the
command line './sage-3.3.rc2/sage' and then fire up the
notebook, I can access Octave and compute the
On Feb 21, 3:45 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the diagnosis and suggestions. Evidently I did the upgrade
from a clone, one I made yesterday to review one of those patches
Suggestion: since the upgrade already gives a prompt and will not
continue unless you
On Feb 21, 8:57 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 21, 3:45 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
I'm now doing an upgrade from my rc0 build, not from any clone, and
we'll see what happens!
The upgrade failed in exactly the same way as above. To
Thanks, Michael. Obviously do not spend any (more) time on this
before 3.3 is out. Or maybe 3.4. or 3.4.1. or...
see http://www.warwick.ac.uk/staff/J.E.Cremona/upgrade.tgz
for the install log and env output.
I could not do either hg heads or hg status in sage-3.3.rc0/devel/
sage :
On Feb 21, 9:58 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
Thanks, Michael. Obviously do not spend any (more) time on this
before 3.3 is out.
The Sage 3.3 sources are already in the usual place with the other
3.3.alpha and rc releases. They should be on the main website
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:57 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 21, 3:45 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the diagnosis and suggestions. Evidently I did the upgrade
from a clone, one I made yesterday to review one of those patches
On Feb 21, 10:41 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:57 AM, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote
Hi,
I particularly like the suggestion that my problem is to upgrade
(which does nothing, of course).
That is an error message from Ipython suggesting
-- Forwarded message --
From: Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:09 AM
Subject: sage @ Quantnet.org - Financial Engineering Forum
To: William Stein wst...@gmail.com
Hi, my google-alert just told me about this. I think you maybe want to
follow
Maurizio wrote:
Another example is with matplotlib. As I can read somewhere on the
web, there are different opinions about using the SAGE plot
capabilities rather than this external package.
Sage's 2d plotting just uses matplotlib, which is a standard package
included in SAge. Matplotlib's
Yesterday, I wanted to make an interact widget that showed an animation more
complicated than the animate command allows. So, on a plane trip, I hacked up
the following. It's a bit rough, and not a proper patch, etc. However, those
who care can paste it into a notebook and check it out.
This link is not working:http://sagemath.org/paper-letter/
It is under doc page/pdf versions link...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Feb 21, 8:57 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 21, 3:45 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
SNIP
The upgrade failed in exactly the same way as above. To recap: I had
a working successful build of sage-3.3.rc0 and was in the main branch
(so
Hello folks,
Sage 3.3 is out and upgrading via the main Sage server is live. It
seems that we are having some trouble with some stale pynac libs on
upgrade from some releases, so please let us know if you are hit by
that. We are tracking the problem at #5333 and there should be an
updated spkg
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:56 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Feb 21, 8:57 am, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 21, 3:45 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John,
SNIP
The upgrade failed in exactly the same way as above. To recap: I had
a
On Feb 21, 4:09 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:56 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
#5333 (pynac.spkg: Delete old pynac libray during spkg-install
I just want to point out that I didn't actually hit that problem and
that wasn't the fix
On Feb 21, 2009, at 00:32 , mabshoff wrote:
On Feb 21, 12:21 am, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
I've recently (yesterday) turned my work MacBook into a dual-boot
MacOSX and
Archlinux machine. I built 3.3.rc3 from scratch under Linux, without
problems and with all
On Feb 20, 2009, at 23:25 , mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.3.rc3 is out and available in the usual place at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.3/
Built w/o problems as an upgrade to rc0, on Mac OS X, 10.5.6 (Dual
Quad Xeon). All tests passed!
Justin
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Burcin,
thank you very much for this!
I admit that I've never heard of Pynac. I'm really glad to have
subscribed this group, otherwise I couldn't have discovered it!
This brings me to a new question: how are
I have been walking through some of the matrix code before adding some
enhancements.
A right_kernel() will take the transpose of a matrix and call
left_kernel(). left_kernel() (or kernel()) generally takes a
transpose before calling some other code to row-reduce the matrix, and
so on. It
On Feb 22, 2009, at 1:25 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
It's because sympy, sympycore and pynac were all written by different
people and as of now they are not compatible. I don't like the
situation either, and if I manage to find funding for the summer, I'd
like to speedup sympy using Cython to
Hello folks,
the final 3.3 sources are out and now available at
http://www.sagemath.org/src/
as well as some of the mirrors already (at least Seattle II, Boston,
Germany and France since I personally pushed or pulled the update).
Over 3.3.rc3 there were as expected very few merges:
Merged
On Feb 19, 2009, at 21:50 , Nick Alexander wrote:
Hi,
The following is the BSD-like license of some MPFR cholesky
decomposition code I might like to use. Is this sage-able?
Nick
(*
Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The
Anything skanky milling around in those subroutine comments?
Thank you all for your attention, but it turns out that Cholesky
decomposition can be naively computed via trivial recursions. 6
lines. Now it may not be numerically stable... but it's easy :)
Nick
43 matches
Mail list logo
