[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Saturday, 14 January 2012 23:29:55 UTC+8, jason wrote: > > On 1/14/12 8:59 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > > On 1/14/12 8:51 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Saturday, 14 January 2012 22:37:17 UTC+8, jason wrote: > >> > >> On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> > looks good (chrome

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Jason Grout wrote: >> It's a little sad to me that the only way to get the menu is right >> click.  This is somewhat non-mac friendly (and downright hostile to >> tablets and phones), as we saw often with jmol at the JMM booth where >> we were constantly tripped u

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage pay electric for build slaves

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Dr David Kirkby wrote: > > > On Jan 10, 4:04 am, William Stein wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Dr. David Kirkby >> >> wrote: >> > I'm not sure if this idea will go down well, but I'll mute it anyway. >> >> > I know William has switched off machines (t2.

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 5:24 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: Thanks a lot for the fix. This works here now on firefox. It also works on opera as long as I am using the worksheet. The _published_ worksheet on the other hand only half-works in opera. See the attached screenshot for the glitch. Can anyone else confirm

[sage-devel] Re: Ubuntu 11.10 testers needed

Successful build with the sage atlas.spkg using 'fast' default arch, but if I build with environment set to use my own atlas ( also 3.8.4) matplotlib won't build; it thinks numpy is not installed. Not sure if this is specific to 4.8 as I have only just got my atlas up and running. All but, three te

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Simon King wrote: > On 14 Jan., 20:18, William Stein wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout >> > I have exactly the same issue on my OSX 10.6.8. >> >> Just to raise awareness, I want to remind people that OS X 10.7.x >> support is a total blocker

[sage-devel] Re: Sage pay electric for build slaves

On Jan 11, 10:36 am, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Just wondering: is bandwidth a problem for you, or would that > potentially become a problem if there were more buildbots at your place, > possibly also building and uploading binaries? I don't have a cap on bandwidth, but upload speed is only 512 kbit

[sage-devel] Re: Sage pay electric for build slaves

On Jan 10, 4:04 am, William Stein wrote: > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Dr. David Kirkby > > wrote: > > I'm not sure if this idea will go down well, but I'll mute it anyway. > > > I know William has switched off machines (t2.math for example), as he does > > not have the power/cooling for th

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: Do I have to install special fonts? What am I doing wrong? If this is really what MathJax looks like, I definitely don't want to switch to MathJax. I pushed a fix to test.sagenb.org. The default now should be to use TeX local fonts, then TeX web fo

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: Do I have to install special fonts? What am I doing wrong? If this is really what MathJax looks like, I definitely don't want to switch to MathJax. Over on sage-notebook, I forwarded a message from Davide which tells us what is happening. I quote be

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Removing spkg/base repo (#11073) needs review

On 2012-01-14 23:03, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/14/12 3:58 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> It allows running ./sage -i and ./sage -sh right after >> downloading a source tarball, making for easier debugging of the Sage >> build process. > > I'm curious: what does this mean? It means the following wil

[sage-devel] Re: Removing spkg/base repo (#11073) needs review

On 1/14/12 3:58 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: It allows running ./sage -i and ./sage -sh right after downloading a source tarball, making for easier debugging of the Sage build process. I'm curious: what does this mean? For example, we needed to test the new sagenb spkg in a clean install (i.e.,

[sage-devel] Removing spkg/base repo (#11073) needs review

At #11073, Volker Braun and I have a patch which removes the spkg/base repository by absorbing it into the root repository. It also moves important scripts like sage-spkg, sage-env, sage-sage (renamed to "sage") to a new directory spkg/bin. The main advantage is that it simplifies the build proce

[sage-devel] Re: Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

On 14 Jan., 20:18, William Stein wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout > > I have exactly the same issue on my OSX 10.6.8. > > Just to raise awareness, I want to remind people that OS X 10.7.x > support is a total blocker for Sage-5.0. Can someone provide me with access to a mach

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:27 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:18 AM, William Stein wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout >> wrote: >>> On 1/14/12 12:58 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > I

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 2:37 PM, William Stein wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout wrote: Thanks for the feedback; please test the fixes. I really hate to write this, but it's important

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout >>  wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the feedback; please test the fixes. >> >> >> I really hate to write this, but it's important.    Evidently, I have >>

[sage-devel] Re: Mathjax needs review

> The very first thing I tried was "show(2/3* x^(3/2 + pi))".  On sagenb.org > with jsmath it > looks amazing -- just like pdflatex output.  On test.sagenb.org it > looks horrible to my eye -- definitely nowhere close to tex or even > jsmath. I don't know if this helps, but the visual horriblene

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:18 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout > wrote: >> On 1/14/12 12:58 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >>> I have made an unofficial sage-5.0.prealpha1 release.  It's an upda

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote: On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jason Grout wrote: Thanks for the feedback; please test the fixes. I really hate to write this, but it's important.Evidently, I have never seriously looked at MathJax before just now, I guess, because my first rea

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 1/14/12 12:58 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: >> >> >> On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >>> I have made an unofficial sage-5.0.prealpha1 release.  It's an updated >>> version of the previous prealpha0.  The only main change i

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:26 AM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 14, 2012 9:07:08 AM UTC-8, William wrote: >> >> >> On Jan 14, 2012 9:00 AM, "Dr David Kirkby" wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Jan 9, 4:39 pm, William Stein wrote: >> >> > > Very few people actually use the notebook

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Dr David Kirkby wrote: > What part of the GPL? Can you be more specific. > >  I know there is this clause > > "However, as a special exception, the source code distributed need not > include anything that is normally distributed (in either source or > binary form)

[sage-devel] Re: Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

On 1/14/12 12:58 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote: On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote: I have made an unofficial sage-5.0.prealpha1 release. It's an updated version of the previous prealpha0. The only main change is the inclusion of the new matplotlib spkg (#11915). Source archive:

Re: [sage-devel] Unofficial release sage-5.0.prealpha1

On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:13 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > I have made an unofficial sage-5.0.prealpha1 release. It's an updated > version of the previous prealpha0. The only main change is the > inclusion of the new matplotlib spkg (#11915). > > > Source archive: > > http://boxen.math.washington.ed

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

On 2012-01-14 18:22, Dr David Kirkby wrote: > Yes, and are you sure port fowarding is permitted by the more > "entreprise" level operating systems. I am not on a Unix box just now, > but I suspect that might fall into the same category as X forwarding. > It probably depends on how sshd_config is se

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 1:17 AM, P Purkayastha wrote: On Saturday, January 14, 2012 2:11:55 PM UTC+8, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/13/12 5:04 PM, William Stein wrote: > Are you planning to install mathjax on any *.sagenb.org ? I cleared off some space and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

On Saturday, January 14, 2012 9:07:08 AM UTC-8, William wrote: > > > On Jan 14, 2012 9:00 AM, "Dr David Kirkby" wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jan 9, 4:39 pm, William Stein wrote: > > > Very few people actually use the notebook in secure=True mode. For > > > those that do, I think it is reasonable

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

On Jan 14, 5:07 pm, William Stein wrote: > On Jan 14, 2012 9:00 AM, "Dr David Kirkby" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 9, 4:39 pm, William Stein wrote: > > > Hi Sage-Devel, > > > > PROPOSAL:  I propose that we remove python_gnutls, gnutls, opencdk, > > > libgcrypt, and > > > libgpg_erro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

On Jan 14, 2012 9:00 AM, "Dr David Kirkby" wrote: > > > > On Jan 9, 4:39 pm, William Stein wrote: > > Hi Sage-Devel, > > > > PROPOSAL: I propose that we remove python_gnutls, gnutls, opencdk, > > libgcrypt, and > > libgpg_error from Sage-5.0. See below for details. > > > > VOTE: > > > > [ ] Ye

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Remove GNUTLS from Sage.

On Jan 9, 4:39 pm, William Stein wrote: > Hi Sage-Devel, > > PROPOSAL:  I propose that we remove python_gnutls, gnutls, opencdk, > libgcrypt, and > libgpg_error from Sage-5.0.   See below for details. > > VOTE: > > [ ] Yes, remove them! > [ ] No, we need them. > [ ] Woops -- you are confused and

[sage-devel] Re: Indemnification against intellectual property infringement claims

On Jan 13, 6:05 pm, rjf wrote: > I think this is a substantial mis-reading of the document. No, it's a mi-sunderstanding by you - possibly due to less than ideal wording by me. > The indemnification has to do only with "covered programs furnished by > Oracle". Yes > So if someone says "we a

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 8:59 AM, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/14/12 8:51 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Saturday, 14 January 2012 22:37:17 UTC+8, jason wrote: On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > looks good (chrome on MacOSX). > What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page > relo

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 8:51 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Saturday, 14 January 2012 22:37:17 UTC+8, jason wrote: On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > looks good (chrome on MacOSX). > What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page > reloading? > Is

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On Saturday, 14 January 2012 22:37:17 UTC+8, jason wrote: > > On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > looks good (chrome on MacOSX). > > What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page > > reloading? > > Is it a bug or a feature? > > Are you talking about Chrome askin

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 2:51 AM, Julien Puydt wrote: Le 14/01/2012 00:48, Jason Grout a écrit : I'd love to, if we have enough disk space for another sage install on that disk. Right now, we have around 4.4G free, so it would take up about a quarter to half of the space left for all of the sagenb.org servers

Re: [sage-devel] New termcap spkg (#12282) needs review

*bump* On 2012-01-11 22:35, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > This is now the very last ticket needing review for sage-4.8 (at least, > as far as we know): > > On 2012-01-09 14:21, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> Please review *blocker* ticket #12282. It fixes a segmentation fault in >> the termcap library, trig

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 1:17 AM, P Purkayastha wrote: On Saturday, January 14, 2012 2:11:55 PM UTC+8, Jason Grout wrote: On 1/13/12 5:04 PM, William Stein wrote: > Are you planning to install mathjax on any *.sagenb.org ? I cleared off some space and

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

On 1/14/12 6:41 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: looks good (chrome on MacOSX). What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page reloading? Is it a bug or a feature? Are you talking about Chrome asking for permission to run a java applet? I think that's a Chrome thing, and not

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

I am not sure if this is Sage's bug. Similar things happen on mathoverflow.net... On the other hand it might just mean that the mathjax settings need to adjusted. Or could it be tinymce? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

looks good (chrome on MacOSX). What about making jmol request permission to run without explicit page reloading? Is it a bug or a feature? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroup

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-notebook] Mathjax needs review

Le 14/01/2012 00:48, Jason Grout a écrit : I'd love to, if we have enough disk space for another sage install on that disk. Right now, we have around 4.4G free, so it would take up about a quarter to half of the space left for all of the sagenb.org servers. That seems a little tight to me. A go