Re: [sage-devel] Re: ask.sagemath.org issues - do we need it?

Le mercredi 3 juillet 2024 à 11:43:52 UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé a écrit : On Tuesday, July 2, 2024 at 4:35:57 PM UTC+2 Matthias Koeppe wrote: Karma and other gamification instruments are apparently available as a plugin. https://meta.discourse.org/t/discourse-gamification/225916 Karma is part of

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ask.sagemath.org issues - do we need it?

Hi, I gave a look at the test Discourse site https://sagemath-test.discourse.group/ (thank you Matthias for setting it up!) as well as to the Jupyter Discourse site pointed out by Dima: https://discourse.jupyter.org/ DIscourse is clearly a high quality tool but I agree with Sébastien that it

[sage-devel] Re: Invitation to Participate in Survey: Governance and Community building

Thank you very much for this initiative! Best wishes, Eric. Le mercredi 26 juin 2024 à 16:10:07 UTC+2, jplab a écrit : > Dear SageMath Community, > > As most of you are likely aware, our communication platforms surrounding > the development of Sagemath have unfortunately been the scene of >

[sage-devel] Re: Vote: Removing Automatic PR Size Labels

I vote for (A1). Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: Use "CI Fix" label for merging into continuous integration runs

+1 Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: use "blocker" label only for PRs; use "critical" label for Issues

-1 from my side, for I think an issue can be a blocker. For instance: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/36914 This issue, which regards the use of the notebook, could not have been detected by the CI framework. It is a serious regression and definitely a blocker IMHO: are we willing to

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Hi Nils, Le vendredi 16 février 2024 à 04:37:28 UTC+1, Nils Bruin a écrit : On Thursday 15 February 2024 at 17:02:14 UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: but that's sphinx (Python), not jupyter. I see. The page I linked to is from Jupyter{book} which is, despite the similarity in name, not the jupyter

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le jeudi 15 février 2024 à 13:36:46 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : A possible solution does not involve changing Sage/Jupyter config. It's by capturing http requests to CDN and replacing them with the local resources. Thank you Dima! Could you indicate how to do this? (looks quite technical

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le jeudi 15 février 2024 à 11:20:40 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : With the previous version of Jupyterlab shipped with Sage 10.2, the system's MathJax was used. Can't we tweak the new Jupyterlab shipped with Sage 10.3 to use the system's MathJax as well? We don't do that. Perhaps tweaking is

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le jeudi 15 février 2024 à 04:54:42 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : I checked again on mac. Yes, jupyterlab (and notebook 7 as well) of Sage 10.3.beta8 fails in loading mathjax 2.7.7. (Before it worked because of the cache, I guess) OK, thanks for the feedback! Hence this is not a

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 18:21:04 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : You may recall that we use jupyterlab_mathjax2 because of the discussion in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36129#issuecomment-1729218062 Thanks for reminding me about this. Then I guess the question is: why

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 15:09:27 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : The partial conclusion is thus: - Sage 10.2 uses Ubuntu 22.04's MathJax (v2.7.9), so there is no issue when the computer is offline. - for some reason, Sage 10.3.beta* refuses to use Ubuntu 22.04's MathJax

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 15:39:05 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 at 10:55:41 PM UTC+9 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:51:01 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : What is puzzling is that MathJax 3.2.0 seems to have been successfully

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:51:01 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : More precisely, the Ubuntu 22.04's libjs-mathjax is version 2.7.9. When the computer is online and I right-click on "About MathJax" in a displayed cell, I get "MathJax v2.7.7", which is not the system

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:51:01 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : What is puzzling is that MathJax 3.2.0 seems to have been successfully installed in the Sage tree during the install of Sage 10.3.beta*, cf. the attached log (SAGE_ROOT/logs/pkgs/mathjax-3.2.0.log), Well, maybe

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:18:20 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:13:04 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : For off the grid working with MathJax, you need it locally installed. It might be that by default it doesn't happen, and MathJax is dynamically

Re: [sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Le mercredi 14 février 2024 à 14:13:04 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : For off the grid working with MathJax, you need it locally installed. It might be that by default it doesn't happen, and MathJax is dynamically loaded from the net. The Ubuntu packages libjs-mathjax and fonts-mathjax are

[sage-devel] No MathJax display in Sage 10.3.beta notebooks when offline

Hi, While working on a Sage 10.3.beta notebook in a train without any internet connection, I've noticed that there is no LaTeX rendering via MathJax, neither in the markdown cells nor in the output cells within the scope of %display latex. There is no such issue with Sage 10.2 and I've

[sage-devel] Re: Exception in sum((4*n+1)/factorial(n),n,1,oo)

I confirm the bug with Sage 10.3.beta7. It seems to be linked with the Maxima interface. Meanwhile, a workaround is to use the SymPy interface: sage: sum((4*n+1)/factorial(n), n, 1, oo, algorithm='sympy') 5*e - 1 Eric. Le vendredi 9 février 2024 à 11:57:08 UTC+1, Georgi Guninski a écrit : >

Re: [sage-devel] Pillow built without jpeg support in Sage 10.2.rc3

Le vendredi 17 novembre 2023 à 10:14:54 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : On 17 November 2023 04:35:53 GMT, Matthias Koeppe wrote: >Or we just let pillow use a system libjpeg if it finds one. This would probably be the easiest solution: I cannot imagine a system without libjpeg... With

[sage-devel] Pillow built without jpeg support in Sage 10.2.rc3

Hi All, Pillow provides the Python Imaging Library (PIL) https://pillow.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ and is a standard package in Sage. Now, in Sage 10.2.rc3, the following code g = plot(sin(x)) # to generate a png figure g.save("fig.png") # from PIL import Image img = Image.open("fig.png")

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 9.5 won't launch nor install (any version ? ) on debian testing/sid and ubuntu 23.10

Hi, In case it might help for the Ubuntu install, you may take a look at this page: https://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/install_ubuntu.html Best wishes, Eric. Le mardi 7 novembre 2023 à 13:00:55 UTC+1, Laurent Bakri a écrit : > Hi all, > > I am using Debian Testing (now "Sid" because I was

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath 10.1 for macOs ARM randomly fails to compute the Riemann/Ricci tensor or Ricci scalar when using threads

Hi, Le lundi 2 octobre 2023 à 13:42:29 UTC+2, Alejandro Marino Vaquero Avilés-Casco a écrit : When running sagemath release version 10.1 in macOs for the arm architecture (the target tested has a M2 processor) with multiple threads, the calculation of the Riemann tensor, the Ricci tensor or

[sage-devel] Re: Poll: deprecate backslash operator

+1 for deprecation Eric; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: [sage-devel] Discussion and poll: should Sage Integers have a backslash operator?

+ 1 for getting rid of the preparsing of \ It is particularly annoying when typing (usually long) expressions like f(x) = x + \ 1 in an input cell of a Jupyter notebook. If the \ is followed by a blank space, one gets Cell In [22], line 1 __tmp__=var("x"); f =

Re: [sage-devel] Make ipympl a standard package

PS: I've just updated the notebook for checking that long math expressions are wrapped. Le mardi 19 septembre 2023 à 21:06:42 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > Hi Kwankyu, > > Le mardi 19 septembre 2023 à 20:56:51 UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > > Hi Eric, > >

Re: [sage-devel] Make ipympl a standard package

Hi Kwankyu, Le mardi 19 septembre 2023 à 20:56:51 UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : Hi Eric, I see no interaction in the "test_display" notebook rendered by nbviewer. This is a limitation of nbviewer. If you provide the latest version of the notebook, I can put it into the notebooks directory

[sage-devel] Make ipympl a standard package

Hi Sage dev, In PR #36129 , which is devoted to the upgrade to Jupyter Notebook 7, we are proposing to make ipympl a standard package. ipympl is a pip-installable package that enables using the interactive features

[sage-devel] Re: Voting: Block-scoped optional tag and the keyword

I vote for (A) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: [sage-devel] Creating a github team

Thanks for your reply. Le mardi 7 février 2023 à 14:33:04 UTC+1, David Roe a écrit : 4. When a component tag is added to a PR (or a new PR created with a component set), if there is no reviewer already requested then the bot will request review from someone on that component team (eventually

[sage-devel] Creating a github team

Hi, Thanks again for all the hard work for the github migration! I would like to create a team "Manifolds" of https://github.com/sagemath, with sufficient permissions so that I can add users to it. How shall I proceed? Are there any team creation request on the github interface or should some

Re: [sage-devel] Re: https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.8

Le lundi 6 février 2023 à 10:47:28 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit : Can you edit it now? Yes, thanks! Eric. I'd removed "Restrict editing to users in teams with push access only" Please also note that GitHub wikis are git repos. You can clone them in the usual way (git clone

[sage-devel] Re: https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.8

Le lundi 6 février 2023 à 09:50:58 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : It is now in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/ReleaseTours-sage-9.8 But we don't have permissions to edit it yet. Do you know when/how we can get these permissions? Sage Days 117 have started this morning and it would be

[sage-devel] Re: https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.8

, February 6, 2023 at 5:38:46 PM UTC+9 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: Hi, Since trac logins are now disabled, it seems that we cannot edit the 9.8 release tour. Eric. Le samedi 7 janvier 2023 à 09:02:07 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : It's time to work on the release tour for the upcoming 9.8 release https

Re: [sage-devel] Migration to GitHub complete

Le lundi 6 février 2023 à 08:25:30 UTC+1, GMS a écrit : Huge thanks to everybody involved. +1 Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-devel] Re: https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.8

Hi, Since trac logins are now disabled, it seems that we cannot edit the 9.8 release tour. Eric. Le samedi 7 janvier 2023 à 09:02:07 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : > It's time to work on the release tour for the upcoming 9.8 release > https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.8 >

Re: [sage-devel] Jan 30 to Feb 4: Trac downtime, migration to GitHub

Le lundi 30 janvier 2023 à 15:07:36 UTC+1, dim...@gmail.com a écrit : OK, it should be read-only now (for pushing, ticket creating/modifying, other state-changing admin) Thank you Dima! Logins still work though, but they have no effect on anything, as far as I can see. Please let me know

[sage-devel] Re: Multiple warnings in sagemath on default fedora 37

Hi, Le vendredi 20 janvier 2023 à 06:26:38 UTC+1, Georgi Guninski a écrit : sage: integrate(floor(x)^2,x) // Giac share root-directory:/usr/share/giac/ // Giac share root-directory:/usr/share/giac/ Added 0 synonyms x*floor(x)^2 I get this one with Sage 9.8.beta7 built from source on

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath docker image + mybinder.org

PS: I confirm that your solution works for the notebooks of https://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/examples.html The start up is quite long, but if one is patient enough, it works! Le jeudi 17 novembre 2022 à 09:41:11 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > Hi, > Le mercredi 16 novembre 2022 à 23:53:

[sage-devel] Re: SageMath docker image + mybinder.org

Hi, Le mercredi 16 novembre 2022 à 23:53:41 UTC+1, de...@benjamin-hackl.at a écrit : > Hey all, > > I really liked the way of making code accessible via a repository or gist > containing a bunch of notebooks together with a simple Dockerfile that has > not much more than "FROM

[sage-devel] Re: Method 'latex.mathjax_avoid_list()' missing in the official docker image

Le mardi 15 novembre 2022 à 23:26:31 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > > The methods latex.add_to_mathjax_avoid_list and latex.mathjax_avoid_list > have been removed in Sage 9.3. So your docker image must be based on an old > version of Sage (current stable version is 9.7). >

[sage-devel] Re: Method 'latex.mathjax_avoid_list()' missing in the official docker image

Le mardi 15 novembre 2022 à 12:28:38 UTC+1, lucca@gmail.com a écrit : > When using the official docker image, from within a Notebook the > methods > >- `latex.add_to_mathjax_avoid_list()` >- `latex.mathjax_avoid_list` > > are missing on the `latex` object. > > These should exist,

[sage-devel] Re: The documentation built for #34730 needs your attention for checking

/shapes2.html#sage.plot.plot3d.shapes2.text3d Le mercredi 9 novembre 2022 à 22:19:23 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > Le mercredi 9 novembre 2022 à 06:22:43 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> Trac #34730 rebases sage_autodoc onto the upgraded Sphinx 5.3.

[sage-devel] Re: The documentation built for #34730 needs your attention for checking

Le mercredi 9 novembre 2022 à 06:22:43 UTC+1, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > Hi, > > Trac #34730 rebases sage_autodoc onto the upgraded Sphinx 5.3.0. It is > responsible for formatting Sage objects (functions, classes, etc.) to build > documentation. > > Please check your favorite sections in our

[sage-devel] Re: Invitation: Weekly 30-minute Sage developer calls on Jitsi

Hi, Le lundi 3 octobre 2022 à 00:32:52 UTC+2, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : > New times: > > Calls for Europe / Africa / Americas: > > Monday noon, 12:15pm San Francisco > Monday afternoon, 3:15pm New York > Monday evening, 21:15 Paris > https://meet.jit.si/VibrantTribesBearEver >

Re: [sage-devel] DISCUSS: move Sage development to Github

Le samedi 24 septembre 2022 à 13:57:36 UTC+2, kcrisman a écrit : > > On another note, I realize that the comment I made 6 years ago after > Volker's comment is still relevant: > "There's also the non-trivial (though not blocker, probably) issue that > zillions of links to trac.sagemath.org

[sage-devel] Re: VOTE: move Sage development to Github

+1 for GitHub -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

Le jeudi 15 septembre 2022 à 18:34:22 UTC+2, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : > On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 9:04:09 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > >> On Thursday, September 15, 2022 at 6:21:09 AM UTC-7 Eric Gourgoulhon >> wrote: >> >>> I don't und

[sage-devel] Re: sage zoom meeting reminder

Sorry I cannot make it this time (I am in the train). But next Thursday should be OK. Best wishes, Eric. Le jeudi 15 septembre 2022 à 16:54:32 UTC+2, wst...@gmail.com a écrit : > Reminder -- that 30 minute Sage zoom meeting thing that Matthias > organized is happening in a few minutes from

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

Le jeudi 15 septembre 2022 à 15:32:22 UTC+2, dim...@gmail.com a écrit : > > > On Thu, 15 Sep 2022, 14:21 Eric Gourgoulhon, wrote: > >> I would like to ask about a point that does not seem to have been >> discussed before (apologies if it was): >> If the migrati

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

I would like to ask about a point that does not seem to have been discussed before (apologies if it was): If the migration to Gihub takes place, would there remain somewhere a read-only copy of Trac? more precisely, of all the Trac tickets? The numerous discussions there constitute a valuable

Re: [sage-devel] Re: incremental migration to github? [prompted by FUNDING issues!!!] + general flakiness of trac

Le mardi 13 septembre 2022 à 07:30:23 UTC+2, David Roe a écrit : > > Here's a proposal on a timeline for making a decision (I welcome feedback > from anyone who thinks this is too fast or too slow). > > * We spend another few days discussing pros and cons and refining the > proposed workflows.

[sage-devel] Re: BROADCAST MESSAGE

Le jeudi 8 septembre 2022 à 09:03:53 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit : > I can still modify the comments. It may be a matter of permissions. If > somebody else confirms, one will have to check. > I've just checked that I'm still able to edit my comments. Eric. -- You received this message

[sage-devel] Re: BROADCAST MESSAGE

Thank you so much Frédéric at al. for all the work in setting up the new Trac! Eric. Le dimanche 4 septembre 2022 à 09:32:42 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit : > Trac 1.2 comes with various changes, including display of full names and > internationalisation. You may want to look in your user

[sage-devel] Issue with the Dependencies field in Trac pages

Hi, Maybe this is related with the recent restart of Trac: the ticket numbers in the "Dependencies" field of a ticket are no longer clickable, nor colored. An example is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30229 Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-devel] Re: Reducing the size of one of the plots placed in a graphicsarray

PS: see also https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/plotting/sage/plot/plot.html#sage.plot.plot.multi_graphics -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

[sage-devel] Re: Reducing the size of one of the plots placed in a graphicsarray

Use multi_graphics instead of graphics_array: ga = multi_graphics([(p, (0, 0, 0.7, 0.7)), (q, (0.65, 0.2, 0.3, 0.3))]) ga.show() [image: mg.png] See https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/plotting/sage/plot/multigraphics.html#sage.plot.multigraphics.MultiGraphics for details. Eric. -- You

[sage-devel] Re: Useful methods for graphics objects

Le mercredi 24 août 2022 à 03:14:22 UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > It is embarrassing that an idea of attaching ".length()" method to a line > segment graphics object leads to SageManifolds. We don't need vectors and > inner products to compute the length of a line segment. I agree that it

[sage-devel] Re: Useful methods for graphics objects

Hi, Le mercredi 24 août 2022 à 02:18:06 UTC+2, Travis Scrimshaw a écrit : > In general, I think we are best leaving the drawing classes to just > drawing as a separations-of-concerns. > +1 IMHO, line2d and line3d should not be considered as mathematical objects (segmented lines in some

[sage-devel] Re: Polling for sphinx background style

grayish > detoned > original. Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web

[sage-devel] Re: Polling for pygments style for our future doc

Le jeudi 4 août 2022 à 18:33:27 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > Thanks for preparing this poll. I vote for > > (1) tango > Sorry, I missed the point about the italic. Please change my vote to (2) default Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed t

[sage-devel] Re: Polling for pygments style for our future doc

Thanks for preparing this poll. I vote for (1) tango Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: make Furo a standard package

Le jeudi 4 août 2022 à 03:29:07 UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > So we propose here to upgrade the Furo package to a standard package. > Please vote. +1 Thanks for working on this. Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To

Re: [sage-devel] Introduction to differentiable manifolds in SageMath

Le samedi 25 juin 2022 à 17:31:10 UTC+2, wst...@gmail.com a écrit : > > There is some issue in the latex display of manifold maps: > > ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \mbox at > position 96: …thbb{E}^{2} \\ \̲m̲b̲o̲x̲{on}\ A : & \ph… > > Thanks -- I've created this

Re: [sage-devel] Introduction to differentiable manifolds in SageMath

Le vendredi 24 juin 2022 à 18:52:00 UTC+2, wst...@gmail.com a écrit : > > I also put a copy of these beautiful notebooks here: > > https://cocalc.com/wstein/support/IntroToManifolds > > Thanks! There is some issue in the latex display of manifold maps: ParseError: KaTeX parse error:

[sage-devel] Introduction to differentiable manifolds in SageMath

Hi, Andrzej Chrzeszczyk (Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce, Poland) has prepared a series of notebooks introducing differentiable manifolds at the textbook level with many examples from Sage and nice figures: https://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/intro_to_manifolds.html Best wishes, Eric. --

[sage-devel] Re: Length of vectors in `plot_vector_field3d()`

Le dimanche 19 juin 2022 à 19:11:24 UTC+2, niran...@gmail.com a écrit : > > For plot() in sage manifold Reference says: > **extra_options – extra options for the arrow plot, like linestyle, width > or arrowsize (see arrow2d() >

[sage-devel] Re: Length of vectors in `plot_vector_field3d()`

Hi, There is no such length issue if you use vector fields on the Euclidean 3-space, instead of plot_vector_field3d with a tuple of components. For instance: sage: E. = EuclideanSpace() sage: v1 = E.vector_field(1, 0, 0) sage: v2 = E.vector_field(2, 0, 0) sage: v1.plot() sage: v2.plot()

[sage-devel] Re: Let's update https://www.sagemath.org/help-video.html

Hi Matthias, Le samedi 4 juin 2022 à 06:18:55 UTC+2, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : > Videos from this week's Sage days are available at > https://researchseminars.org/seminar/SageDays112358 > Thanks! > if some of you happen to have video recordings, in particular for > tutorial-like material,

[sage-devel] Re: Help --> Sage Tutorial, Reference etc doesn't load in JupyterLab

Thanks for the report. I confirm the bug with Sage 9.7.beta0 on Ubuntu 20.04. Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-devel] Re: Jupyterlab installation very slow in Sage 9.6

Le dimanche 22 mai 2022 à 22:23:35 UTC+2, Nils Bruin a écrit : > The rebuild should go through make nowadays. If you do > export MAKE="make -j8" > I think it should use up to 8 parallel jobs > Thanks for the tip. It works! I've tested it when installing Jupyterlab in Sage 9.7.beta0. There

[sage-devel] Jupyterlab installation very slow in Sage 9.6

Hi, In a newly installed Sage 9.6 from source, I've moved on to install Jupyterlab (since it's still an optional package, cf. https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/orUpb-YXIHk/) by running ./sage -i jupyterlab_widgets as advertised in

[sage-devel] Re: favorable mention of sage in popular youtube video

NIce! Eric. Le samedi 14 mai 2022 à 20:36:09 UTC+2, wst...@gmail.com a écrit : > Hi, > > Tim Daly (of Axiom) just told me that there is a very nice use of Sage > at around 7:30-10:30 of this youtube video about RSA > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ShwJqAalOk > > I think it's being used on

Re: [sage-devel] Question about factories, representations and multiple classes

Hi, Le samedi 14 mai 2022 à 00:07:02 UTC+2, David Roe a écrit : > I think the following should work: > > class MyObject: > def __classcall__(cls, arg): > if isinstance(arg, special): > return typecall(MyObject_specific_case, arg) > else: > return

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Dev Prizes

Hi William, Le dimanche 1 mai 2022 à 19:24:54 UTC+2, wst...@gmail.com a écrit : > Hello Sage-Devel, > > The 3 people who expressed interest in being on the Sage dev prize > committee are me, John Cremona, and Karl-Dieter Crisman. Would > anybody else like to be on the committee? Sorry for

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5 released

Hi, First of all many thanks to all of you who are improving the installation instructions! Le mardi 26 avril 2022 à 14:22:28 UTC+2, seb@gmail.com a écrit : > several Linux distributions carry reasonably up to date binary Sage > installations (and these can be installed on various VMs,

[sage-devel] Re: Error in documentation: location of `constants.py`

Hi, Thanks for spotting these errors in the documentation. Would you open a ticket to fix them? See https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/trac.html Best wishes, Eric. Le vendredi 25 mars 2022 à 13:12:28 UTC+1, adarsh.k...@gmail.com a écrit : > Apart from this, the documentation is

Re: [sage-devel] Notebook for testing display

Le mercredi 23 mars 2022 à 17:32:13 UTC+1, raymond@gmail.com a écrit : > 1) I had to do > > pip install ipympl > Would it be reasonable to do a try/except in the header? > Actually a dependency of jupyterlab_widgets to ipympl has been introduced in Sage 9.6.beta5, so that as soon as

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: make Jupyterlab a standard package

Le mercredi 23 mars 2022 à 12:01:15 UTC+1, kcrisman a écrit : > Sorry for a tangential question - the overview page seems to imply that > *everything* from a (current) Jupyter notebook will work in a Jupyterlab > instance (and, by extension, presumably can easily be imported). Would > that

[sage-devel] Proposal: make Jupyterlab a standard package

Hi, The optional package Jupyterlab has been upgraded to version 3.3.1 in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32069 (merged in Sage 9.6.beta5) Jupyterlab offers more functionalities than the classic Jupyter Notebook and is aimed to replace it, see e.g.

[sage-devel] Re: spherical harmonics still broken in 9.5.beta8

(theta)^2) terms which appear for odd orders m. This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33501. Eric. Le mercredi 5 janvier 2022 à 09:14:23 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > Le mercredi 5 janvier 2022 à 08:27:56 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > >> >> Actually, the

[sage-devel] Re: %lsmagic broken in sage interpreter

This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30661 A workaround is sage: %display unicode_art# actually anything but plain sage: %lsmagic Eric. Le dimanche 13 mars 2022 à 10:57:50 UTC+1, vdelecroix a écrit : > Dear all, > > The IPython magic %lsmagic is supposed to list the available > magic

[sage-devel] Re: Wrong output of method arguments() on symbolic functions

Le mercredi 9 mars 2022 à 07:19:06 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : > Note also that function('f')(y, x) does not actually create a function > with named arguments. > It is an ordinary symbolic expression that evaluates the undefined > function f of unspecified arity. > Unbound variables in

[sage-devel] Wrong output of method arguments() on symbolic functions

Hi, We have currently sage: x, y = var('x y') sage: fyx = function('f')(y, x) sage: fyx.arguments() (x, y) which is just the reverse of the expected output. Similarly, we have sage: atan2(y,x).arguments() (x, y) Taking a look at the code, one sees that fyx.arguments() calls

[sage-devel] Re: documentation build complains about database Cremona (9.6.beta3)

Hi Vincent, I did not had such an issue on my Ubuntu 20.04 computer. Your log says 'cremona_mini.db' not found in any of ['/home/debian/sage/local/share/cremona'] For some reason, this file is present in my sage root directory but not in yours: ls -l

[sage-devel] Re: Sagemath in The Calabi-Yau Landscape

Hi, Le samedi 26 février 2022 à 02:09:04 UTC+1, hohoa...@gmail.com a écrit : > Dear List, > > Sagemath occupies a whole section (Appendix E) in "The Calabi-Yau > Landscape: from Geometry, to Physics, to Machine-Learning" by Yang-Hui He: > > https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.02893 > > Does Sagemath

[sage-devel] Re: sagemath 9.6 beta1 jupyter notebook missing output

Hi, Le samedi 19 février 2022 à 03:28:03 UTC+1, hohoa...@gmail.com a écrit : > > >1. In [3] only gives A^4 in Out [3] (missing A^0, A^1, A^2 and A^3) >2. In [4] gives no output (but In [8] does) >3. In [6] gives no output (but In [7] does) > > There is no bug in all this. To display

[sage-devel] Re: minimal requirements

Le vendredi 4 février 2022 à 01:05:05 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : > And > https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/spkg/_prereq.html#spkg-prereq > has formatted versions of this information. > > Shouldn't gfortran be added to the above lists (at least for Linux systems)? Of course, it

[sage-devel] Re: sage 9.5 build failed at package numpy-1.21.4 (on Windows Server 2019 WSL)

Hi, Have you followed the instructions in the section "Ubuntu on Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) prerequisite installation" of https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/source.html ? Eric. Le jeudi 3 février 2022 à 10:22:11 UTC+1, hohoa...@gmail.com a écrit : > Greetings, > > The

[sage-devel] Re: pdf docs from jupyter notebook

Hi, I am not sure to understand what your problem is: from a Sage Jupyter notebook, if I click on the "Help" menu and select "Sage Documentation", then a new tab opens in the browser at the address http://localhost:/kernelspecs/sagemath/doc/index.html It displays html documentation and

Re: [sage-devel] Re: spherical harmonics still broken in 9.5.beta8

Le jeudi 6 janvier 2022 à 06:20:28 UTC+1, Jonathan Thornburg a écrit : > I think this problem is worse than "just" a lack of simplification: > if sin(theta) < 0 then sqrt(sin(theta)^2 != sin(theta), i.e., the > theta dependence is wrong, not "just" not-fully-simplified. > > Well, the standard

[sage-devel] Re: spherical harmonics still broken in 9.5.beta8

Le mercredi 5 janvier 2022 à 08:27:56 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > > Actually, the difference between the two results is essentially due to a > different convention in the Condon-Shortley phase > (cf. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_harmonics#Condon%E2%80%9

[sage-devel] Re: spherical harmonics still broken in 9.5.beta8

Hi, Le mercredi 5 janvier 2022 à 00:36:11 UTC+1, Jonathan Thornburg a écrit : > Sage has long had problems with spherical harmonics, e.g., this thread > from June 2019: > https://groups.google.com/g/sage-support/c/I_d_meMxRbM/m/Esxo5UO2BAAJ > > As of 9.5.beta8, spherical harmonics are (still)

[sage-devel] Re: \Bold command definition in every LaTeX output

injection in the global namespace). Eric. > - John > > On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 3:05:44 AM UTC-8 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > >> Le mercredi 22 décembre 2021 à 00:26:58 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit : >> >>> I have no objection to this, but the purpose

[sage-devel] Re: \Bold command definition in every LaTeX output

Le mercredi 22 décembre 2021 à 00:26:58 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit : > I have no objection to this, but the purpose for using \Bold{...} was to > make its behavior easily customizable, since some people might want > \mathbf{...} and some might want \mathbb{...}. > The customization could

[sage-devel] Re: \Bold command definition in every LaTeX output

Hi, Le lundi 20 décembre 2021 à 12:06:05 UTC+1, AlbertHilb a écrit : > Problem solved! Thank you very much! > That being said, it seems to me that these \newcommand{Bold} in each LaTeX output (!) are an unnecessary pollution of the Jupyter notebooks in %display latex mode. Unless there

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 9.5.beta8: ipython help triggers pythran deprecation warnings

More precisely, these are deprecation warnings from numpy functions invoked by pythran. Le lundi 13 décembre 2021 à 22:56:03 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > Hi, > > In the just released Sage 9.5.beta8, invoking help on a function with the > question mark yields a bunc

[sage-devel] Sage 9.5.beta8: ipython help triggers pythran deprecation warnings

Hi, In the just released Sage 9.5.beta8, invoking help on a function with the question mark yields a bunch of pythran deprecation warnings before the help shows off: sage: sin? /home/eric/sage/9.5.develop/local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/pythran/tables.py:4520: DeprecationWarning: `np.bool`

[sage-devel] Re: A simple funny bug in Sagemath

Hi, It works for me with SageMath 9.4. Maybe you should upgrade to that version (the last stable one). Eric. Le mardi 7 décembre 2021 à 09:59:42 UTC+1, duan...@gmail.com a écrit : > If I running 3 lines codes below: > > PR. = PolynomialRing(Zmod(0x10001)) > f = (x + y) ^ 3 >

Re: [sage-devel] Docker images no longer being build and is gitlab still maintained?

Hi, Le vendredi 3 décembre 2021 à 05:06:30 UTC+1, maarten...@navara.nl a écrit : > In the meantime I managed to verify that aside from the gitlab CI/CD there > are no other things that are broken. Meaning that I managed to build the > docker file shipped with sage just fine on my laptop. I

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >